2011 north dakota finance facts · 2011 north dakota finance facts legislator's pocket guide...
Post on 21-Sep-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2011North DakotaFinance Facts
Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota
Budget, Performance, and statistics
North Dakota Legislative Council600 East Boulevard Avenue
Bismarck, ND 58505
701.328.2916www.legis.nd.gov
September 2011 Published by the North Dakota Legislative Council
2011 North Dakota Finance Facts
Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and Statistics
This report contains key indicators and trends relating to North Dakota's economy, state budget, and the performance of its agencies and departments.
The information in the report is categorized by the following major topic areas:
Topic SectionArea Color Pages
1. Economic Statistics .................Red ........................ 1-62. State Budget ...........................Orange ..................7-143. K-12 Education .......................Green ..................15-204. Higher Education ....................Blue .....................21-245. Human Services .....................Purple .................25-286. Corrections ..............................Brown ..................29-307. Economic Development .........Gray ....................31-328. Transportation .........................Black ...................33-35
The table of contents on the following pages provides more detailed reference to specific data included in the report.
North Dakota Legislative Council
600 East Boulevard AvenueBismarck, ND 58505-0360
(701) 328-2916www.legis.nd.govSeptember 2011
2011 NorTh DAkoTA FiNANCE FACTSTable of Contents
ECoNomiC STATiSTiCSTotal Population Estimates ....................................................... 1Per Capita Personal Income .................................................... 1Percentage of North Dakota Population (Children Ages 0-17) in Poverty Compared to the United States ........................... 2Percentage of North Dakota Population (All Ages) in Poverty Compared to the United States............................... 2Gross State Product ................................................................. 3Total State Foreign Exports ...................................................... 4Average Daily Oil Production and Average Price Per Barrel of Oil..................................................................... 4Employment and Unemployment ............................................. 5Average Home Sale Prices by City .......................................... 5State-Local Tax Burden Compared to United States Average .......................................................... 6
STATE BuDGET2011-13 General Fund Budget Summary ................................ 7General Fund Revenues - Beginning Balance, Ongoing Revenues, and Transfers ...................................... 72011-13 Estimated General Fund Revenues ........................... 8General Fund Revenues - Major Revenue Types ................... 9Current Tax Rates ..................................................................... 92011-13 Biennium General Fund Appropriations ................... 10History of General Fund Appropriations ................................. 102011-13 Biennium All Funds Appropriations ...........................11History of Total Appropriations .................................................11Number of State Employees .................................................. 12Funding Increases for State Employee Salary Adjustments . 12Cost of State Employee Health Insurance Premiums History................................................................ 12Assistance to Political Subdivisions ....................................... 13State Debt ............................................................................... 13Common Schools Trust Fund ................................................. 14Legacy Fund ........................................................................... 14
k-12 EDuCATioNState School Aid Appropriations - History .............................. 15State School Aid Appropriations - Detail ................................ 16State School Aid - Per Student Payments ............................. 16Student Enrollment and Number of Teachers ........................ 17American College Testing Program Scores ........................... 17National Assessment of Educational Progress ...................... 18
hiGhEr EDuCATioNHigher Education - General Fund Appropriations and Tuition and Fee Revenue ............................................ 21
North Dakota University System Fall FTE Student Enrollment ........................................................................... 21FTE Student Enrollment by Institution .................................... 21Higher Education Tuition Rates .............................................. 22Higher Education Performance Measures ............................. 23North Dakota University System Research Expenditures ....................................................................... 24
humAN SErviCESDepartment of Human Services Legislative Appropriations ..................................................................... 25Major Medicaid Costs ............................................................. 25Medical Assistance - Average Annual Medicaid Eligibles and Recipients ...................................................... 26Children's Health Insurance Program - Average Annual Recipients ............................................................... 26Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - Cases and Benefits ............................................................. 27Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - Cases and Benefits ............................................................. 27Child Support - Percentage of Current Child Support Collected ............................................................... 28Children and Family Services - Number of Children in Foster Care .................................... 28State Hospital and Developmental Center - Average Daily Census ........................................................ 28
CorrECTioNSDepartment of Corrections and Rehabilitation FTE Positions, Inmates, and General Fund Appropriations ..................................................................... 29Parole and Probation .............................................................. 29Recidivism Rates .................................................................... 30
ECoNomiC DEvELoPmENTDepartment of Commerce Legislative Appropriations ........... 31Centers of Excellence Legislative Appropriations .................. 31Private Sector Businesses ...................................................... 32Manufacturing Jobs ................................................................ 32Number of Patents .................................................................. 32
TrANSPorTATioNState Highway Funding - History ............................................ 33State Highway Funding .......................................................... 33Estimated Federal Highway Funding ..................................... 34Motor Fuels Taxes................................................................... 34Miles of Roadways in North Dakota - 2008 ............................ 34Estimated Highway Construction Costs Per Mile .................. 35North Dakota Bridge System Condition ................................. 35North Dakota Interstate System Ride Trends ........................ 35
Econom
icS
tatisticsToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)
Year Population1
AnnualPercentage
Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%
1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center
PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE
North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584
$33,585$36,678
$39,874 $39,530 $40,596
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
United States North Dakota
4.5%increase
2.0%increase
2.6%decrease
3.7%increase
ToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)
Year Population1
AnnualPercentage
Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%
1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center
PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE
North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584
$33,585$36,678
$39,874 $39,530 $40,596
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
United States North Dakota
4.5%increase
2.0%increase
2.6%decrease
3.7%increase
ToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)
Year Population1
AnnualPercentage
Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%
1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center
PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE
North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584
$33,585$36,678
$39,874 $39,530 $40,596
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
United States North Dakota
4.5%increase
2.0%increase
2.6%decrease
3.7%increase
1
ECoNomiC STATiSTiCS
2
PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ChiLDrEN AGES 0-17) iN
PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES
The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau
PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ALL AGES) iN PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES
The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau
14.5%12.4% 14.0% 14.2% 14.1%
18.5% 17.9% 18.0% 18.2% 20.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota United States
11.6% 11.7% 11.8% 11.5% 11.7%
13.3%12.3%
13.0% 13.2% 14.3%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota United States
PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ChiLDrEN AGES 0-17) iN
PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES
The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau
PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ALL AGES) iN PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES
The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.
Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau
14.5%12.4% 14.0% 14.2% 14.1%
18.5% 17.9% 18.0% 18.2% 20.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota United States
11.6% 11.7% 11.8% 11.5% 11.7%
13.3%12.3%
13.0% 13.2% 14.3%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota United States
Eco
nom
icS
tatis
tics GroSS STATE ProDuCT
Total Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions)
2010 Gross State Product by major industry
Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809
Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance
2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975
Real estate, rental, and leasing
2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765
Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628
$34,686
$0$5,000
$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government14%
Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting
8%
Manufacturing8%
Health care/social
assistance9%
Real estate, rental,and leasing
11%
Wholesale trade7%
Retail trade6%
Finance and insurance
6%
Construction4%
Other27%
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
GroSS STATE ProDuCT Total Gross State Product
(Amounts Shown in millions)
2010 Gross State Product by major industry
Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809
Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance
2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975
Real estate, rental, and leasing
2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765
Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628
$34,686
$0$5,000
$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government14%
Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting
8%
Manufacturing8%
Health care/social
assistance9%
Real estate, rental,and leasing
11%
Wholesale trade7%
Retail trade6%
Finance and insurance
6%
Construction4%
Other27%
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
GroSS STATE ProDuCT Total Gross State Product
(Amounts Shown in millions)
2010 Gross State Product by major industry
Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809
Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance
2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975
Real estate, rental, and leasing
2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765
Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628
$34,686
$0$5,000
$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government14%
Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting
8%
Manufacturing8%
Health care/social
assistance9%
Real estate, rental,and leasing
11%
Wholesale trade7%
Retail trade6%
Finance and insurance
6%
Construction4%
Other27%
9.5% increase
11.0% increase
0.2% decrease
9.7% increase
3
Econom
icS
tatistics
ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010
Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics
AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL
Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources
$2,047
$2,772
$2,193$2,536
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2007 2008 2009 2010
$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000
FY2006
FY2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
PriceBarrels
Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel
ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010
Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics
AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL
Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources
$2,047
$2,772
$2,193$2,536
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2007 2008 2009 2010
$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000
FY2006
FY2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
PriceBarrels
Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel
ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010
Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics
AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL
Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources
$2,047
$2,772
$2,193$2,536
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2007 2008 2009 2010
$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000
FY2006
FY2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
PriceBarrels
Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel
ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010
Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics
AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL
Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources
$2,047
$2,772
$2,193$2,536
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2007 2008 2009 2010
$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000
FY2006
FY2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
PriceBarrels
Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel
4
Eco
nom
icS
tatis
tics
EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT
YearEnd
Job Force Employment unemployment
unemployment rate
2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor
AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)
Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Employment Unemployment
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200
WillistonWahpeton
MinotJamestown
Grand ForksFargo
DickinsonBismarck
North Dakota
2008 2009 2010
EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT
YearEnd
Job Force Employment unemployment
unemployment rate
2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor
AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)
Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Employment Unemployment
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200
WillistonWahpeton
MinotJamestown
Grand ForksFargo
DickinsonBismarck
North Dakota
2008 2009 2010
EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT
YearEnd
Job Force Employment unemployment
unemployment rate
2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor
AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)
Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Employment Unemployment
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200
WillistonWahpeton
MinotJamestown
Grand ForksFargo
DickinsonBismarck
North Dakota
2008 2009 2010
5
Econom
icS
tatistics
STATE-LoCAL TAX BurDEN ComPArED To uNiTED STATES AvErAGE1
Year North Dakota united States
Average 2005 8.3% 9.6%2006 8.9% 9.7%2007 9.2% 9.8%2008 8.7% 9.9%2009 9.5%2 9.8%
1An estimate of the combined state and local tax burden imposed on residents of the state as calculated by the Tax Foundation. Taxes include property taxes, sales taxes, individual income taxes, and corporate income taxes. The percentage is calculated by dividing the estimated total amount paid by the residents in taxes by the state's per capita income.
2For 2009 North Dakota ranked 26 of the 50 states. Of all states, New Jersey ranked highest with a percentage of 12.2, and Alaska ranked lowest with a percentage of 6.3.
7.5%
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota U.S. Average
STATE-LoCAL TAX BurDEN ComPArED To uNiTED STATES AvErAGE1
Year North Dakota united States
Average 2005 8.3% 9.6%2006 8.9% 9.7%2007 9.2% 9.8%2008 8.7% 9.9%2009 9.5%2 9.8%
1An estimate of the combined state and local tax burden imposed on residents of the state as calculated by the Tax Foundation. Taxes include property taxes, sales taxes, individual income taxes, and corporate income taxes. The percentage is calculated by dividing the estimated total amount paid by the residents in taxes by the state's per capita income.
2For 2009 North Dakota ranked 26 of the 50 states. Of all states, New Jersey ranked highest with a percentage of 12.2, and Alaska ranked lowest with a percentage of 6.3.
7.5%
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
North Dakota U.S. Average
6
Eco
nom
icS
tatis
tics
7
State B
udget
2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21
Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8
Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12
1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.
2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.
GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,
AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium Beginning Balance
ongoing revenues Transfers Total
2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9
$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2
$2,162.9$2,520.7
$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6
$489.7$608.1
$0$500
$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers
2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21
Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8
Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12
1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.
2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.
GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,
AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium Beginning Balance
ongoing revenues Transfers Total
2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9
$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2
$2,162.9$2,520.7
$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6
$489.7$608.1
$0$500
$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers
2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21
Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8
Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12
1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.
2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.
GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,
AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium Beginning Balance
ongoing revenues Transfers Total
2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9
$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2
$2,162.9$2,520.7
$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6
$489.7$608.1
$0$500
$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers
STATE BuDGET
Sta
te B
udge
t
2011-13 ESTimATED GENErAL FuND rEvENuES (Amounts Shown in millions)
1Transfers and miscellaneous revenues include:
Strategic investment and improvements fund $305,000,000Property tax relief sustainability fund 295,000,000State Mill and Elevator Association 6,650,000Gas tax administration 1,485,000
Total $608,135,000
Beginningbalance$660.2316.0%
Sales and use tax
$1,382.2333.6%
Motor vehicle
excise tax $183.04
4.5%
Individual income tax
$544.6713.2%Corporate
income tax $126.24
3.1%
Oil and gas production
tax$133.83
3.2%
Oil extraction tax
$166.174.0%
Other$313.43
7.6%
Transfersand misc.1$608.1414.8%
Total - $4,117.98
2011-13 ESTimATED GENErAL FuND rEvENuES (Amounts Shown in millions)
1Transfers and miscellaneous revenues include:
Strategic investment and improvements fund $305,000,000Property tax relief sustainability fund 295,000,000State Mill and Elevator Association 6,650,000Gas tax administration 1,485,000
Total $608,135,000
Beginningbalance$660.2316.0%
Sales and use tax
$1,382.2333.6%
Motor vehicle
excise tax $183.04
4.5%
Individual income tax
$544.6713.2%Corporate
income tax $126.24
3.1%
Oil and gas production
tax$133.83
3.2%
Oil extraction tax
$166.174.0%
Other$313.43
7.6%
Transfersand misc.1$608.1414.8%
Total - $4,117.98
8
State B
udget
GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - mAJor rEvENuE TYPES (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium Sales Tax
individual income
Tax
Corporate income
Tax others Total 2005-07 $841.9 $587.6 $232.3 $501.1 $2,162.92007-09 $1,046.5 $681.7 $239.7 $552.8 $2,520.72009-11 $1,267.2 $729.2 $234.4 $522.2 $2,753.02011-13 $1,382.2 $544.7 $126.2 $796.51 $2,849.6
1This amount reflects legislative action allocating an additional $229 million of oil and gas tax collections to the general fund providing a total of $300 million per biennium.
CurrENT TAX rATES North Dakota sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated
impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately$340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) isapproximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
Sales tax Individual income tax
Corporate income tax Others
GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - mAJor rEvENuE TYPES (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium Sales Tax
individual income
Tax
Corporate income
Tax others Total 2005-07 $841.9 $587.6 $232.3 $501.1 $2,162.92007-09 $1,046.5 $681.7 $239.7 $552.8 $2,520.72009-11 $1,267.2 $729.2 $234.4 $522.2 $2,753.02011-13 $1,382.2 $544.7 $126.2 $796.51 $2,849.6
1This amount reflects legislative action allocating an additional $229 million of oil and gas tax collections to the general fund providing a total of $300 million per biennium.
CurrENT TAX rATES North Dakota sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated
impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately$340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) isapproximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
Sales tax Individual income tax
Corporate income tax Others
CurrENT TAX rATESNorth Dakota's sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated
impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately $340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) is approximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.
9
Sta
te B
udge
t
2011-13 BiENNium GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
hiSTorY oF GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
$2,000.5
$2,574.3
$3,296.6
$4,066.9
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
28.7%increase
28.1%increase
23.4%increase
Generalgovernment
$289.07%
Elementary & secondary education
$902.222%
Property tax relief
education$341.8
8%Highereducation
$655.816%
Othereducation
$43.71%
Humanservices$932.023%
Other health & welfare
$45.71%
regulatory$61.52%
Public safety$223.4
6%
Ag. & economic
dev.$148.9
4%
Naturalresources
$46.31%
Transportation$376.6
9%
Total - $4,066.9
2011-13 BiENNium GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
hiSTorY oF GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
$2,000.5
$2,574.3
$3,296.6
$4,066.9
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
28.7%increase
28.1%increase
23.4%increase
Generalgovernment
$289.07%
Elementary & secondary education
$902.222%
Property tax relief
education$341.8
8%Highereducation
$655.816%
Othereducation
$43.71%
Humanservices$932.023%
Other health & welfare
$45.71%
regulatory$61.52%
Public safety$223.4
6%
Ag. & economic
dev.$148.9
4%
Naturalresources
$46.31%
Transportation$376.6
9%
Total - $4,066.9
10 11
State B
udget
2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5
1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal funds Special funds
$5,785.7$6,624.0
$8,938.9$9,924.5
14.5%increase
34.9%increase
11.0%increase
Generalgovernment
$519.95%
Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4
14%
Property tax relief
education$341.8
3%
Highereducation
$764.68%
Othereducation
$165.12%
Humanservices$2,605.4
26%
Other health & welfare$308.1
3%
Regulatory$360.8
4%
Public safety$519.1
5%
Ag. & economic
dev.$367.2
4%
Naturalresources
$574.56%
Transportation$2,039.6
20%
Total - $9,924.5
2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5
1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal funds Special funds
$5,785.7$6,624.0
$8,938.9$9,924.5
14.5%increase
34.9%increase
11.0%increase
Generalgovernment
$519.95%
Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4
14%
Property tax relief
education$341.8
3%
Highereducation
$764.68%
Othereducation
$165.12%
Humanservices$2,605.4
26%
Other health & welfare$308.1
3%
Regulatory$360.8
4%
Public safety$519.1
5%
Ag. & economic
dev.$367.2
4%
Naturalresources
$574.56%
Transportation$2,039.6
20%
Total - $9,924.5
2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5
1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal funds Special funds
$5,785.7$6,624.0
$8,938.9$9,924.5
14.5%increase
34.9%increase
11.0%increase
Generalgovernment
$519.95%
Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4
14%
Property tax relief
education$341.8
3%
Highereducation
$764.68%
Othereducation
$165.12%
Humanservices$2,605.4
26%
Other health & welfare$308.1
3%
Regulatory$360.8
4%
Public safety$519.1
5%
Ag. & economic
dev.$367.2
4%
Naturalresources
$574.56%
Transportation$2,039.6
20%
Total - $9,924.5
12
Sta
te B
udge
t
NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1
(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))
1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.
FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS
2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and
4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and
5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012
CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY
Biennium monthly Premium
increase From Previous Biennium
Percentage increase
2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%
8,437.68
8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16
8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support
$554 $658
$826 $887
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1
(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))
1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.
FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS
2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and
4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and
5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012
CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY
Biennium monthly Premium
increase From Previous Biennium
Percentage increase
2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%
8,437.68
8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16
8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support
$554 $658
$826 $887
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1
(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))
1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.
FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS
2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and
4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and
5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012
CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY
Biennium monthly Premium
increase From Previous Biennium
Percentage increase
2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%
8,437.68
8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16
8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support
$554 $658
$826 $887
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1
(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))
1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.
FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS
2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and
4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and
5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012
CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY
Biennium monthly Premium
increase From Previous Biennium
Percentage increase
2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%
8,437.68
8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16
8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support
$554 $658
$826 $887
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
13
ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:
STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)
Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)
North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding
State aid distribution fund
Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees
Coal, oil, and gas taxes
Other
$1,087.0$1,302.6
$1,843.8
$2,333.0
19.8%increase
41.5%increase
26.5%increase
$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1
$1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:
STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)
Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)
North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding
State aid distribution fund
Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees
Coal, oil, and gas taxes
Other
$1,087.0$1,302.6
$1,843.8
$2,333.0
19.8%increase
41.5%increase
26.5%increase
$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1
$1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:
STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)
Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)
North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding
State aid distribution fund
Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees
Coal, oil, and gas taxes
Other
$1,087.0$1,302.6
$1,843.8
$2,333.0
19.8%increase
41.5%increase
26.5%increase
$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1
$1,533.5
$0$200$400$600$800
$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
State B
udget
14
Sta
te B
udge
t
The common schools trust fund is provided for in Article IX of the Constitution of North Dakota which provides that the fund is to be used to support the common schools of the state. The fund consists of income from state lands dedicated for the support of schools as well as 10 percent of oil extraction tax revenue, 45 percent of tobacco settlement money received by the state under subsection IX(c)(1) of the Master Settlement Agreement, and funds received by the state under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. Article IX, Section 1, of the Constitution of North Dakota provides that only the interest and income of the trust fund may be expended.
LEGACY FuNDThe legacy fund was created in 2010 when the voters
of North Dakota approved a constitutional amendment to provide that 30 percent of oil and gas production and oil extraction taxes on oil and gas produced after June 30, 2011, be transferred to the legacy fund. The principal and earnings of the legacy fund may not be spent until after June 30, 2017, and any expenditure of principal after that date requires a vote of at least two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the Legislative Assembly. Not more than 15 percent of the principal of the fund may be spent during a biennium. Interest earnings accruing after June 30, 2017, are transferred to the general fund at the end of each biennium. The June 30, 2013, balance of the fund is estimated to be $618.6 million.
CommoN SChooLS TruST FuND The common schools trust fund is provided for in Article
IX of the North Dakota Constitution which provides that the fund is to be used to support the common schools of the state. The fund consists of income from state lands dedicated for the support of schools as wells as 10 percent of oil extraction tax revenue, 45 percent of tobacco settlement money received by the state under subsection IX(c)(1) of the master settlement agreement, and funds received by the state under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. Section 1 of Article IX of the North Dakota Constitution provides that only the interest and income of the trust fund may be expended.
Fiscal Year Beginning Asset Balance (Excluding Land and mineral values)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
LEGACY FuND The legacy fund was created in 2010 when the voters of
North Dakota approved a constitutional amendment to provide that 30 percent of oil and gas production and oil extraction taxes on oil and gas produced after June 30, 2011, be transferred to the legacy fund. The principal and earnings of the legacy fund may not be spent until after June 30, 2017, and any expenditure of principal after that date requires a vote of at least two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the Legislative Assembly. Not more than 15 percent of the principal of the fund may be spent during a biennium. Interest earnings accruing after June 30, 2017, are transferred to the general fund at the end of each biennium. The June 30, 2013, balance of the fund is estimated to be $618.6 million.
$761.9$887.1
$908.9$846.3
$1,221.5
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
CommoN SChooLS TruST FuND
15
K-12 E
ducation
STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - hiSTorY
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund
State Tuition Fund
other Special Funds Total
2005-07 $627.0 $71.6 $698.62007-09 $704.6 $76.2 $780.82009-11 $1,098.11 $86.3 $89.81,2 $1,274.22011-13 $1,223.11 $101.6 $26.22,3 $1,350.94
1The 2009 and 2011 Legislative Assemblies provided, as state school aid, $295 million and $341.8 million from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants to school districts during the 2009-11 and the 2011-13 bienniums, respectively. In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly provided deficiency appropriations totaling $4.4 million, of which $4.2 million was from the property tax relief sustainability fund and $211,264 was from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants during the 2009-11 biennium.
2The 2009 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $85.6 million from federal funds available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $21.2 million from federal funds available through the federal education jobs fund program.
3The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided $5 million from the oil and gas impact fund for rapid enrollment grants during the 2011-13 biennium.
4In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fundState tuition fundGeneral fund - Mill levy reduction grantsOther special funds
$698.6 $780.8
$1,350.9$1,274.2
STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - hiSTorY
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund
State Tuition Fund
other Special Funds Total
2005-07 $627.0 $71.6 $698.62007-09 $704.6 $76.2 $780.82009-11 $1,098.11 $86.3 $89.81,2 $1,274.22011-13 $1,223.11 $101.6 $26.22,3 $1,350.94
1The 2009 and 2011 Legislative Assemblies provided, as state school aid, $295 million and $341.8 million from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants to school districts during the 2009-11 and the 2011-13 bienniums, respectively. In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly provided deficiency appropriations totaling $4.4 million, of which $4.2 million was from the property tax relief sustainability fund and $211,264 was from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants during the 2009-11 biennium.
2The 2009 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $85.6 million from federal funds available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $21.2 million from federal funds available through the federal education jobs fund program.
3The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided $5 million from the oil and gas impact fund for rapid enrollment grants during the 2011-13 biennium.
4In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fundState tuition fundGeneral fund - Mill levy reduction grantsOther special funds
$698.6 $780.8
$1,350.9$1,274.2
k-12 EDuCATioN
16
K-1
2 E
duca
tion
STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - DETAiL
2009-11 2011-13 increase
(Decrease) State school aid $808,370,295 $918,459,478 $110,089,183Transportation aid 48,500,000 48,500,000 Special education 15,500,000 16,000,000 500,000Rapid enrollment grants
5,000,000 5,000,000
Federal education jobs fund program payments
21,242,838 21,242,838
Supplemental operations grants
16,795,584 (16,795,584)
Supplemental one-time grants
85,644,337 (85,644,337)
Mill levy reduction grants
299,444,264 341,790,000 42,345,736
Total state school aid
$1,274,254,480 $1,350,992,3161 $76,737,836
1In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.
STATE SChooL AiD - PEr STuDENT PAYmENTS
$3,116
$3,233
$3,250
$3,325
$3,200
$3,779
$3,910
$3,980
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
Actual paymentsLegislative
appropriation
STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - DETAiL
2009-11 2011-13 increase
(Decrease) State school aid $808,370,295 $918,459,478 $110,089,183Transportation aid 48,500,000 48,500,000 Special education 15,500,000 16,000,000 500,000Rapid enrollment grants
5,000,000 5,000,000
Federal education jobs fund program payments
21,242,838 21,242,838
Supplemental operations grants
16,795,584 (16,795,584)
Supplemental one-time grants
85,644,337 (85,644,337)
Mill levy reduction grants
299,444,264 341,790,000 42,345,736
Total state school aid
$1,274,254,480 $1,350,992,3161 $76,737,836
1In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.
STATE SChooL AiD - PEr STuDENT PAYmENTS
$3,116
$3,233
$3,250
$3,325
$3,200
$3,779
$3,910
$3,980
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
Actual paymentsLegislative
appropriation
17
STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS
AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES
The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.
1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.
2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7
21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5
20.71
21.221.1 21.1 21.0
21.1
22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41
19.5
20
20.5
21
21.5
22
22.5
23
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Comparison of Average ACT Scores
North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2
9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264
95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Number of teachers Student enrollment
STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS
AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES
The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.
1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.
2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7
21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5
20.71
21.221.1 21.1 21.0
21.1
22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41
19.5
20
20.5
21
21.5
22
22.5
23
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Comparison of Average ACT Scores
North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2
9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264
95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Number of teachers Student enrollment
K-12 E
ducation
STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS
AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES
The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.
1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.
2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7
21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5
20.71
21.221.1 21.1 21.0
21.1
22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41
19.5
20
20.5
21
21.5
22
22.5
23
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Comparison of Average ACT Scores
North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2
9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264
95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Number of teachers Student enrollment
AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNGProGrAm SCorES
The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.
18
NATioNAL ASSESSmENT oF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS
The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.
Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.
Average NAEP Scores - Eighth Grade
1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.
287 287
292 293
286 286288
289
276278
280
282
274276278280282284286288290292294
2003 2005 2007 2009
mathematics
North Dakota Region Nation1
270 270
268 269
269 268 268 269
261 260 261 262
259
261
263
265
267
269
271
2003 2005 2007 2009
reading
North Dakota Region Nation1
NATioNAL ASSESSmENT oF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS
The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.
Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.
Average NAEP Scores - Eighth Grade
1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.
287 287
292 293
286 286288
289
276278
280
282
274276278280282284286288290292294
2003 2005 2007 2009
mathematics
North Dakota Region Nation1
270 270
268 269
269 268 268 269
261 260 261 262
259
261
263
265
267
269
271
2003 2005 2007 2009
reading
North Dakota Region Nation1
K-1
2 E
duca
tion
NATioNAL ASSESSmENToF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS
The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.
Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.
19
K-12 E
ducation
Average NAEP Scores - Fourth Grade
1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.
238
243245 245
239 242 244 244
234237
239 239
225
230
235
240
245
250
2003 2005 2007 2009
mathematics
North Dakota Region Nation1
222
225 226 226
223
223225 223
216 217
220 220
210212214216218220222224226228
2003 2005 2007 2009
reading
North Dakota Region Nation1
Average NAEP Scores - Fourth Grade
1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.
238
243245 245
239 242 244 244
234237
239 239
225
230
235
240
245
250
2003 2005 2007 2009
mathematics
North Dakota Region Nation1
222
225 226 226
223
223225 223
216 217
220 220
210212214216218220222224226228
2003 2005 2007 2009
reading
North Dakota Region Nation1
20
NoTES
21
Higher E
ducation
hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND
TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT
FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN
institutionFall 2009
ActualFall 2010
Actual Fall 2011 Estimate
Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193
35,075
36,095
37,564
38,913 39,193
33,000
34,000
35,000
36,000
37,000
38,000
39,000
40,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate
$389.6
$472.0
$593.4$655.8
$491.1
$553.2
$545.1$580.5
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue
hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND
TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT
FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN
institutionFall 2009
ActualFall 2010
Actual Fall 2011 Estimate
Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193
35,075
36,095
37,564
38,913 39,193
33,000
34,000
35,000
36,000
37,000
38,000
39,000
40,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate
$389.6
$472.0
$593.4$655.8
$491.1
$553.2
$545.1$580.5
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue
hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND
TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT
FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN
institutionFall 2009
ActualFall 2010
Actual Fall 2011 Estimate
Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193
35,075
36,095
37,564
38,913 39,193
33,000
34,000
35,000
36,000
37,000
38,000
39,000
40,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate
$389.6
$472.0
$593.4$655.8
$491.1
$553.2
$545.1$580.5
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue
hiGhEr EDuCATioN
23
Higher E
ducationhiGhEr EDuCATioN
PErFormANCE mEASurESThe following are selected higher education performance
measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:
hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES
The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:
Student Graduation rates1
2007 2008 2009 2010
National Average
2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.
Freshman retention rates1
2006 2007 2008 2009
National Average
2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES
The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:
Student Graduation rates1
2007 2008 2009 2010
National Average
2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.
Freshman retention rates1
2006 2007 2008 2009
National Average
2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES
The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:
Student Graduation rates1
2007 2008 2009 2010
National Average
2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.
Freshman retention rates1
2006 2007 2008 2009
National Average
2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES
The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:
Student Graduation rates1
2007 2008 2009 2010
National Average
2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.
Freshman retention rates1
2006 2007 2008 2009
National Average
2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Two-year institutions Four-year institutions
22
Hig
her E
duca
tion
hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATESThe following is information regarding resident student
tuition rates for various programs:
hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student
tuition rates for various programs:
resident Student - undergraduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618
resident Student - Graduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044
resident Student - Professional Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota
law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997
University of North Dakota medical school
$23,303 $24,119 $24,722
University of North Dakota physical therapy
$10,770 $11,147 $11,426
Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income
2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions
North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%
Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%
Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%
hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student
tuition rates for various programs:
resident Student - undergraduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618
resident Student - Graduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044
resident Student - Professional Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota
law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997
University of North Dakota medical school
$23,303 $24,119 $24,722
University of North Dakota physical therapy
$10,770 $11,147 $11,426
Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income
2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions
North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%
Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%
Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%
hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student
tuition rates for various programs:
resident Student - undergraduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618
resident Student - Graduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044
resident Student - Professional Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota
law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997
University of North Dakota medical school
$23,303 $24,119 $24,722
University of North Dakota physical therapy
$10,770 $11,147 $11,426
Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income
2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions
North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%
Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%
Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%
hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student
tuition rates for various programs:
resident Student - undergraduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618
resident Student - Graduate Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044
resident Student - Professional Programs
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota
law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997
University of North Dakota medical school
$23,303 $24,119 $24,722
University of North Dakota physical therapy
$10,770 $11,147 $11,426
Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income
2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions
North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%
Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%
Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%
25
Hum
an Services
DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4
mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs
DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4
mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs
DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4
mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs
DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General
Fund Federal Funds
Special Funds Total
2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4
mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs
humAN SErviCES
24
Hig
her E
duca
tion
Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1
Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate
4.23 4.16 4.12
Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution
4.15 4.17 4.13
1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.
Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
National Average2009-10
Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body
72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%
NOCTI - Business management
78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%
Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES
(Amounts Shown in millions)
$159.9 $169.5$180.5
$186.2$201.1
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1
Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate
4.23 4.16 4.12
Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution
4.15 4.17 4.13
1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.
Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
National Average2009-10
Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body
72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%
NOCTI - Business management
78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%
Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES
(Amounts Shown in millions)
$159.9 $169.5$180.5
$186.2$201.1
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1
Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate
4.23 4.16 4.12
Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution
4.15 4.17 4.13
1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.
Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
National Average2009-10
Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body
72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%
NOCTI - Business management
78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%
Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%
NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES
(Amounts Shown in millions)
$159.9 $169.5$180.5
$186.2$201.1
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
27
Hum
an Services
SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02
TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
$280
$290
$300
$310
$320
$330
$340
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02
TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
$280
$290
$300
$310
$320
$330
$340
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02
TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
$280
$290
$300
$310
$320
$330
$340
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02
TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS
Fiscal Year
Average Number of Cases
Average monthlyBenefit
2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
$280
$290
$300
$310
$320
$330
$340
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit
26
Hum
an S
ervi
ces
mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS
Fiscal Year Average Annual
Eligibles Average Annual
recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352
ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Eligibles Recipients
3,329
3,821 4,006
3,470 3,368
3,718
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS
Fiscal Year Average Annual
Eligibles Average Annual
recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352
ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Eligibles Recipients
3,329
3,821 4,006
3,470 3,368
3,718
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS
Fiscal Year Average Annual
Eligibles Average Annual
recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352
ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Eligibles Recipients
3,329
3,821 4,006
3,470 3,368
3,718
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
29
Corrections
DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,
AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium
General Fund Appropriation (in millions)
Average Dailyinmate
Population FTE
Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293
1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.
2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.
PAroLE AND ProBATioN
Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017
$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
2005-07 Actual
2007-09 Actual
2009-11 Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation
FTE positions, inmates
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Males FemalesCalendar Year
4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017
DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,
AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium
General Fund Appropriation (in millions)
Average Dailyinmate
Population FTE
Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293
1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.
2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.
PAroLE AND ProBATioN
Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017
$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
2005-07 Actual
2007-09 Actual
2009-11 Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation
FTE positions, inmates
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Males FemalesCalendar Year
4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017
DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,
AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium
General Fund Appropriation (in millions)
Average Dailyinmate
Population FTE
Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293
1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.
2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.
PAroLE AND ProBATioN
Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017
$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
2005-07 Actual
2007-09 Actual
2009-11 Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation
FTE positions, inmates
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Males FemalesCalendar Year
4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017
DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,
AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium
General Fund Appropriation (in millions)
Average Dailyinmate
Population FTE
Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293
1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.
2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.
PAroLE AND ProBATioN
Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017
$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
2005-07 Actual
2007-09 Actual
2009-11 Actual
2011-13Legislative
appropriation
FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation
FTE positions, inmates
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Males FemalesCalendar Year
4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017
CorrECTioNS
28
ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED
ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE
STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS
73.4%
74.2%
75.9%
75.0%74.2%
72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Federal fiscal year
968 869760 768 768 736
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
266 266 272 262 247
131 126 123 120 108
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
State Hospital Developmental Center
ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED
ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE
STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS
73.4%
74.2%
75.9%
75.0%74.2%
72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Federal fiscal year
968 869760 768 768 736
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
266 266 272 262 247
131 126 123 120 108
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
State Hospital Developmental Center
ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED
ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE
STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS
73.4%
74.2%
75.9%
75.0%74.2%
72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Federal fiscal year
968 869760 768 768 736
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
266 266 272 262 247
131 126 123 120 108
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
State Hospital Developmental Center
Hum
an S
ervi
ces
31
Econom
icD
evelopment
DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.
CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001
2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002
1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.
2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).
$19.2$28.6
$43.5
$29.8
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
$0
$10
$20
$30
2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations
$5.2
$21.3 $20.0 $20.0
$12.0
DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.
CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001
2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002
1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.
2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).
$19.2$28.6
$43.5
$29.8
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
$0
$10
$20
$30
2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations
$5.2
$21.3 $20.0 $20.0
$12.0
DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.
CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS
(Amounts Shown in millions)
Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001
2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002
1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.
2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).
$19.2$28.6
$43.5
$29.8
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
$0
$10
$20
$30
2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations
$5.2
$21.3 $20.0 $20.0
$12.0
ECoNomiC DEvELoPmENT
30
Cor
rect
ions
21.7% 25.4%21.2%
22.8%
20.8%
12.1% 13.4%14.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Males Females
rECiDiviSm rATES
Calendar Year
malesreleased
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%
Calendar Year
Females released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%
Calendar Year
Total released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%
NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
21.7% 25.4%21.2%
22.8%
20.8%
12.1% 13.4%14.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Males Females
rECiDiviSm rATES
Calendar Year
malesreleased
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%
Calendar Year
Females released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%
Calendar Year
Total released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%
NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
21.7% 25.4%21.2%
22.8%
20.8%
12.1% 13.4%14.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Males Females
rECiDiviSm rATES
Calendar Year
malesreleased
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%
Calendar Year
Females released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%
Calendar Year
Total released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%
NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
21.7% 25.4%21.2%
22.8%
20.8%
12.1% 13.4%14.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Males Females
rECiDiviSm rATES
Calendar Year
malesreleased
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%
Calendar Year
Females released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%
Calendar Year
Total released
returned for a New
Crime
returned for a
Technical violation
Total returned
Total Percentage returned
rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%
NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
33
Transportation
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92
Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)
2009-11Statutory Funding
2011-13Statutory Funding
Additional Funding for oil-
impactedAreas
Additional Funding
forNon-oil-impacted
Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64
Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05
Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05
Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05
Public transportation fund
5.71 6.21
County and township road projects
142.04
Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.
3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.
4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.
$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92
Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)
2009-11Statutory Funding
2011-13Statutory Funding
Additional Funding for oil-
impactedAreas
Additional Funding
forNon-oil-impacted
Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64
Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05
Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05
Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05
Public transportation fund
5.71 6.21
County and township road projects
142.04
Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.
3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.
4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.
$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)
(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92
Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)
2009-11Statutory Funding
2011-13Statutory Funding
Additional Funding for oil-
impactedAreas
Additional Funding
forNon-oil-impacted
Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64
Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05
Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05
Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05
Public transportation fund
5.71 6.21
County and township road projects
142.04
Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.
3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.
4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.
5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.
$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13
Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding
TrANSPorTATioN
32
Eco
nom
icD
evel
opm
ent
PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011
mANuFACTuriNG JoBS
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011
NumBEr oF PATENTS
Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011
25,056
24,732
25,12725,074
25,741
24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
26,000 26,100 26,400
23,600
22,700
20,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
66
82
63
82
107
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011
mANuFACTuriNG JoBS
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011
NumBEr oF PATENTS
Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011
25,056
24,732
25,12725,074
25,741
24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
26,000 26,100 26,400
23,600
22,700
20,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
66
82
63
82
107
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011
mANuFACTuriNG JoBS
Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011
NumBEr oF PATENTS
Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011
25,056
24,732
25,12725,074
25,741
24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
26,000 26,100 26,400
23,600
22,700
20,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
66
82
63
82
107
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Transportation
ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE
2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)
$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)
$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000
Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)
$450,000 $780,000 $760,000
Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000
NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN
Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges
State urban County Total2006
Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%
2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%
2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%
1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.
2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.
NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009
Excellent/Good Fair/Poor
miles
ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE
2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)
$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)
$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000
Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)
$450,000 $780,000 $760,000
Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000
NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN
Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges
State urban County Total2006
Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%
2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%
2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%
1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.
2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.
NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009
Excellent/Good Fair/Poor
miles
ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE
2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)
$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)
$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000
Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)
$450,000 $780,000 $760,000
Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000
NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN
Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges
State urban County Total2006
Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%
2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%
2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%
1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.
2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.
NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2006 2007 2008 2009
Excellent/Good Fair/Poor
miles
35
Tran
spor
tatio
n
ESTimATED FEDErAL hiGhWAY FuNDiNG1
(Amounts Shown in millions) 2007-09
Biennium 2009-11
Biennium2011-13
BienniumFederal Highway Administration funding
$453.7 $500.9 $569.5
Emergency relief funds 2.5 33.7 56.2Federal rail funds 8.6 2.3 6.1National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5.6 10.0 11.4
Federal transit funds 11.2 12.8 13.7Funding for Devils Lake area projects 0 43.8 0
Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Highway infrastructure
0 170.1 19.33
Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Transit programs
0 6.02 4.83
Total $481.6 $779.6 $681.01Federal funding received for highway construction projects requires matching funds provided by the state. Interstate highway projects are funded 90 percent with federal funds and 10 percent with state funds, and most other state highway projects are funded with 80 percent federal funds and 20 percent state funds.
2Does not include $5,041,000 of federal fiscal stimulus funding distributed directly to transit programs in metropolitan planning areas.
3Includes $10 million of unspent federal fiscal stimulus funding originally appropriated by the 2009 Legislative Assembly.
moTor FuELS TAXES Both gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in
North Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2.0 million per year or $4.0 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.
miLES oF roADWAYS iN NorTh DAkoTA - 2008
State highway system 7,385County roads 18,835Other rural roads 56,753City streets 3,871
Total 86,844
moTor FuELS TAXESBoth gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in North
Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2 million per year or $4 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.
ESTimATED FEDErAL hiGhWAY FuNDiNG1
(Amounts Shown in millions) 2007-09
Biennium 2009-11
Biennium2011-13
BienniumFederal Highway Administration funding
$453.7 $500.9 $569.5
Emergency relief funds 2.5 33.7 56.2Federal rail funds 8.6 2.3 6.1National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5.6 10.0 11.4
Federal transit funds 11.2 12.8 13.7Funding for Devils Lake area projects 0 43.8 0
Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Highway infrastructure
0 170.1 19.33
Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Transit programs
0 6.02 4.83
Total $481.6 $779.6 $681.01Federal funding received for highway construction projects requires matching funds provided by the state. Interstate highway projects are funded 90 percent with federal funds and 10 percent with state funds, and most other state highway projects are funded with 80 percent federal funds and 20 percent state funds.
2Does not include $5,041,000 of federal fiscal stimulus funding distributed directly to transit programs in metropolitan planning areas.
3Includes $10 million of unspent federal fiscal stimulus funding originally appropriated by the 2009 Legislative Assembly.
moTor FuELS TAXES Both gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in
North Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2.0 million per year or $4.0 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.
miLES oF roADWAYS iN NorTh DAkoTA - 2008
State highway system 7,385County roads 18,835Other rural roads 56,753City streets 3,871
Total 86,844
34
top related