a reliability generalization of the life satisfaction index k. a. wallace & j. c. caruso...
Post on 16-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
A Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index
K. A. Wallace & J. C. Caruso
University of Montana
Presented at the Annual Meeting of The Gerontological Society of America, November 2002.
Purpose To examine score reliability for a widely
used measure of life satisfaction, the Life Satisfaction Index (LSI; Neugarten et al., 1961) Average score reliability Variation in score reliability as a function
of sample characteristics (e.g., gender; mean age; scale length; etc.)
Developing Ratings of Life Satisfaction Crafted to assess well-being using a subjective
evaluation of one’s own present and/or past life Part of the Kansas City Study of Adult Life
(Neugarten et al., 1961) Thematic analysis of measures of adjustment and
morale 5 components of well-being:
Zest versus apathy Resolution and fortitude Congruence between desired and achieved goals Self-concept Positive mood tone
The Scales Life Satisfaction Index A (LSIA)
Life Satisfaction Index B (LSIB)
Life Satisfaction Index Z (LSIZ; Wood et al., 1969)
18-item version (Adams, 1969)
8-item version (LSIW; James et al., 1986)
30-item version (Maynard, 1993)
Reliability Generalization Meta-analytic technique Examines average score reliability (e.g.,
Vacha-Haase, 1998)
Examines relationships between study characteristics and score reliability
Sample size Scale length Mean age of sample Standard deviation of age Gender
Mean LSI Standard deviation LSI Language of administration Type of sample
Method – Data Collection PsycINFO literature search
Life satisfaction index and LSI 157 possible articles
59.87% no mention of reliability 9.56% indicated LSI reliable test, no data 6.37% cited reliability from previous work 3.18% reported reliability in unusable form .64% not empirical 1.27% could not be obtained 19.11% (30) provided usable reliability information
Total of 34 samples used
Descriptive Statistics for Sample Characteristics (N=34)Variable M SD RangeSample size 235.53 328.46 20-1571Scale length 17.09 4.21 8-30Mean age 61.79 17.17 20.2-83.3Std dev age 6.89 3.38 3-15.7Proportion female .63 .28 0-1.00Mean LSI 15.56 13.01 3.08-65.5Std dev LSI 3.40 2.34 .52-11.83Lang of admin .78 .42 0-1.00Sample type .26 .51 0-1.00
Results Average Score Reliability
Mean = .79 (SD = .10) Median = .79 Range of .56 (.42 to .98)
Bivariate correlations Score reliability was not significantly related to: scale
length, mean age, standard deviation of age, proportion female, sample size, mean LSI, or standard deviation LSI
t tests No difference in score reliability as function of
language of administration or sample type
Discussion Adequate average score reliability for the
LSIFile drawer problem?
No relationship between score reliability and sample characteristics Preliminary evidence for adequate reliability of
scores generated with LSI across various sample characteristics
Limitations?
Future Research & Implications Replication Conceptualization of reliability as property
of scores (e.g., Wilkinson & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999)
Inclusion of more detailed demographic and reliability information
top related