a sociology of the media introduction ii prof. dr. joost van loon institut für soziologie, lmu...
Post on 11-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
A Sociology of the Media Introduction II
Prof. Dr. Joost van Loon
Institut für Soziologie, LMU
Nottingham Trent University, U.K.
Details
• Sprechstunde: Di 10-12,
• Konradstraße 6, Zi. 205
• Email: joost.vanloon@soziologie.uni-muenchen.de
Outline
i. Technology as Ordering (reflections on Martin Heidegger and Walter Ong)
ii. Form
iii. Historicity
iv. Cultural Embedding
v. Embodiment (and Disembodiment)
Technology as Ordering
• Technologies ‘enframe’ the world; that is they order them in the double sense of (a) providing a structure and (b) commanding specific actions.
• This ordering constitutes the essence of mediation.
Technology as Ordering –
A Meeting with Heidegger
Technology as Ordering –
A Meeting with Heidegger• Technology engenders particular
perspectives (the essence of technology is revealing)
• Enframing: bringing forth into presence• Presence is not ‘just there’ it is an
accomplishment of mediation (as a form of presencing)
• Mediation is the creation of media events• Mediation = “coming in-between”
Technology as Ordering –
A Meeting with Walter Ong
Technology as Ordering –
A Meeting with Walter Ong• Orality and Literacy• Orality: acoustic space: timeless, ephemeral,
unity of enunciating actor (author) and enunciated act, ‘immediate’, active repetition as skilful task (memory, ability to enunciate)
• Literacy: visual space, linear, objective, separation of enunciating actor (author) and enunciated act (the text), reification, replication becomes a simple task, alienation
Form
• The form of mediation has significant bearing on the way in which communication works
• Forms are the products of formatting, which can also be seen as ‘contextual’
• Two approaches to forms of communication (Carey, 1986)– Communication as transmission– Communication as ritual
Historicity
• Media as ‘cause’ of historical transformations• Media-changes as ‘effects’ of historical forces• Media are not static; they evolve• Media evolutions involve changing relations
between form, matter, use and know-how• Examples:
– Speech: the content is not just ideas but words, i.e. language
– Writing: the content is not just speech but also the graphs (hieroglyphs, pictograms, alphabet)
Cultural Embedding
• ‘Articulations of form through use and know how’• The Medium is the Message (McLuhan, 1964)• Culture is not given but ‘practiced’ (as sense-
making). Sense-making is performative;• The practice of mediation includes ‘selectivity’ of
use• Use affects how we perceive, think and
communicate• All forms of mediation are motivated
Embodiment and Disembodiment
Embodiment
• Speech is the first communication medium• It uses language = an abstract system of
symbols based on arbitrary connections between sounds and ‘things’.
• Media are extensions of ‘man’ (McLuhan, 1964): they are embodied.
• Bodies are (among other things) gendered.• Gender constitutes a form of differentiation
which generates the possibility of subjectivity and identity
and Disembodiment• Bodies are not ‘closed’ – media extending bodies create networked
bodies. Body-boundaries are not fixed.• Matthew Fuller: a Nietzschean concept of the body as the ‘starting
point’ for knowledge. • this has two distinct advantages:
(1) it provides a materialist and action-based grounding of perception, ordering, indeed mediation and
(2) it bypasses the need to impose an a-priori hierarchy of the organization of this mediation.
The ‘subject’ of communication is thus no longer a privileged entity (i.e. the human being) whose status is derived from metaphysics, but instead itself an effect of a sustained interaction between forces.
Following Latour (1988b) we could further specify that these forces themselves are irreducible (to interests, beliefs, moral values etc.).
top related