a summary to current clustering methods and optics: ordering points to identify the clustering...

A Summary to Current Clustering Methods and OPTICS: Ordering Points To Identify the Clustering Structure

Presented byHo Wai Shing

Overview Introduction Current Clustering Techniques OPTICS Discussions

Introduction What is clustering?

Given: a dataset with N points in a d -dimensional space

Task: find a natural partitioning of the points into a number (k ) of closely related groups (clusters) and noise

Introduction Example Application

To find similar electronic parts from their design blue-prints:

use Fourier transform to transform contours of parts into coefficients

do clustering on the coefficients discuss this later in the talk

Introduction What are the main concerns?

Efficiency Effectiveness Scalability Interactivity

Current Techniques can be classified into groups

hierarchical vs partitioning bottom-up merging vs flat partitioning

centroid-based vs density-based 1 or more representative points for a

cluster

Several Clustering Algorithms k -mean BIRCH DBSCAN CURE / C2P OPTICS

k-mean partitions the space into k clusters each cluster is represented by the

mean of the points belong to this cluster

iteratively refines the k representative points until reaching a local minimal on total distances within clusters

k-mean the clusters must be convex, and

should have similar size (may not be the case in real data)

need to scan the database many times (slow)

easily disturbed by outliers (every point counts in calculating the mean)

an example dataset

BIRCH use CF-Tree to summarize the data

points so that everything are in memory points will be merged to a leaf entry of

the CF-Tree if they are similar points will be stored in an “extension” if

no similar leaves can be found build clusters over those leaves

instead of the original data points

an example dataset

entries in CF-Tree Leaves (contains N, LS, SS)

an example dataset

… …

entries in CF-Tree Leaves (contains N, LS, SS)

BIRCH basically hierarchical one of the fastest algorithm available scan the data only once can remove some outliers can be used as a pre-clustering step the result depends on inserting order

DBSCAN the first density-based algorithm

without grid clusters = collections of density-

connected points definitions:

directly density-reachable density-reachable density-connected

r is directly density-reachable from q

DBSCAN start with an arbitrary point, perform k-NN (k-nearest-neighbor)

search for that point if it is dense then we grow that

point into a cluster find another point until we exhaust

all the points

DBSCAN good:

can find arbitrary shaped clusters intuitive definition of clusters reasonable complexity if index is available

for k-NN search bad:

difficult to determine input parameters Eps and MinPts

suffers from “Chaining Effect”

The Chaining Problem

chain

CURE instead of using all points in

calculating the distance between a point and a cluster like DBSCAN, CURE uses a set of representative points within a cluster

this could reduce the chaining effect

CURE diagram: no longer chains

actual points points are close,but representatives ain’t

C2P much better than CURE in terms of

efficiency (O(n2lgn) to O(nlgn + m2lgm)) accomplished by a O(nlgn) pre-

clustering phase add links between all the points and their

nearest neighbours condense each connected graph into a

single point repeat until m points remains

OPTICS Ordering Points To Identify the

Clustering Structure in SIGMOD 99 by Ankerst et al. A generalization of DBSCAN + a

visualization technique

OPTICS Motivation:

input parameters (e.g., Eps) are difficult to be determined

one global parameter setting may not fit all the clusters

it’s good to allow users to have flexibility in selecting clusters

OPTICS definitions

core-distance of a point p the distance between the point p and its

MinPts’th neighbour reachability-distance of a point p

w.r.t. another point o the distance between o and p, with a

lower bound of core-dist(o)

OPTICS start from an arbitrary point, sorts the

points according to the reachability-distance

this sorting can be used to produce density-based clusters with 0 < Eps < Epsinput

Reachability plot can be used to provide a good visualization tool for analyzing clusters

OPTICS reachability plot

OPTICS 16-d reachability plot

Discussions All the methods described above

fail at high-dimensional cases “The curse of dimensionality”

distances between all the points are nearly the same

grids are usually not dense (O(2d) grids vs O(n) points)), clusters tend to be divided by grids

no efficient indices for k-NN search

Discussions key observation:

not all dimensions are meaningful in clustering

some clusters may exist under a subset of dimensions while the others exist under another subset of dimensions

leads to: feature selection subspace clustering / projected clustering

References M Ankerst, M M Breunig and H-P Kriegel, J Sander, OPTICS: Ordering

Points To Identify the Clustering Structure, SIGMOD’99 T Zhang, R Ramakrishnan and M Livny, BIRCH: An Efficient Data

Clustering Method for Very Large Databases, SIGMOD’96 S Guha, R Rastogi and K Shim, CURE: An Efficent Clustering Algorithm

for Large Databases SIGMOD’98 C C Aggarwal and P S Yu, Finding Generalized Projected Clusters in

High Dimensional Spaces, SIGMOD’00 R Agrawal, J Gehrke, D Gunopulos and P Raghavan, Automatic

Subspace Clustering of High Dimensional Data for Data Mining Applications, SIGMOD’98

M Ester, H-P Kriegel, J Sander and X Xu, A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Database with Noise, KDD’96

A Nanopoulos, Y Theodoridis and Y Manolopoulos, C2P: Clustering based on Closest Pairs, VLDB’01

Questions?