activation studies on benefit of the selection of the ess target concept

Post on 04-Feb-2016

40 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Activation studies on benefit of the selection of the ESS target concept. D. Ene. M. P. W. Chin. C. Kharoua. E. Noah. F. Plewinski ESSS-AB. Stora Algatan 4. Lund. Sweden. ESS in Lund. Goal. Development of a method to be used for residual field estimation for target - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

D. Ene. M. P. W. Chin. C. Kharoua. E. Noah. F. Plewinski

ESSS-AB. Stora Algatan 4. Lund. Sweden

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 2

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 3

-Development of a method to be used for residual field estimation for target and its surroundings. Selection of the appropriate approach for the optimized model estimates.

-Rough estimates for order of magnitude evaluations. Global amounts are analyzed.

-Investigation of the influence of various parameters: -proton beam energy; -target material; -complexity of the geometry model.

irradiation history, beam profile. etc

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 4

Neutron flux in ith cell

⇨The neutron flux is assumed to be constant over the irradiation period and not being modified by the irradiated medium

Geometryand materialsdescription PHITS/

MCNPX

Residues in ith cell

Irradiation Scheme-

H*(10)MCNPX

Activation products&Photon sources

40 y irradiation @5000h

DCHAIN-SP-2001/CINDER

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 5

Proton beam:Gauss :2x = 10 cm 2y =3 cmE= 2.5GeV | ( 1-4) GeV

Target materials: Hg. PbBi. PbAu. W (Ta claded)Target vessel: SS316Moderator clad: AlBeam window: AlMg3

Irradiation history:38 y 5 MW @ 5000h5000 h 5MW3678 h 05000 h 5 MW

Normalization : 5 MW

Moderators: L-H2

R=16cm. H=20cm

Preliminary results

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 6

neutrons

protons

Hg target

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 7

Hg_target

SS vessel

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 8

Hg target

Hg target

Reflector configuration

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 9

SS vessel

Al cladAl clad

SS vessel

59Ni, 14C, 93Mo,91Nb

51Cr, 55Fe, 3H,54Mn

3H, 51Cr, 55Fe,63Ni, 60Co

3H

28Al

26Al, 14C

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 10

Hg target

Hg target

stars

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 11

T#1

T#1

198Au. 187W (n.) (JEF2.2) ?

T#1

194Hg-194Au208Bi202Pb163Ho. 191Nb. 93Mo

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 12

Hg

W

PbBi

PbAu

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 13

Hg PbBi PbAu W

nuclide [Bq/cc] [%] nuclide [Bq/cc] [%] nuclide [Bq/cc] [%] nuclide [Bq/cc] [%]

Tl204 2.08E+16 52.06 H 3 1.74E+16 43.22 1 H 3 2.0132E+16 84.85 W 185 2.72E+16 31.82

H 3 1.65E+16 41.34 Bi207 8.25E+15 20.46 2 Au195 1.4671E+15 6.18 H 3 2.27E+16 26.62

Hg203 7.12E+14 1.78 Pb207m 6.95E+15 17.22 3 Tl204 1.2087E+15 5.90 W 181 2.23E+16 26.10

Au195 6.15E+14 1.54 Po210 5.89E+15 14.60 4 Pt193 1.6217E+14 0.68 Ta182 5.95E+15 6.97

Pt193 3.42E+14 0.85 Tl204 1.20E+15 2.98 5 Ta179 4.6096E+13 0.19 Ta179 2.63E+15 3.07

Ta179 6.89E+13 0.17 Au195 1.33E+14 0.33 6 Bi207 4.2933E+13 0.18 Os185 1.09E+15 1.28

Lu172 5.32E+13 0.13 Po208 5.31E+13 0.13 7 Lu172 3.9563E+13 0.17 Lu173 5.57E+14 0.65

Lu172m 5.27E+13 0.13 Pt193 2.68E+13 0.07 8 Lu172m 3.9175E+13 0.17 Lu172 4.79E+14 0.56

Hf172 5.27E+13 0.13 Lu172 2.35E+13 0.06 9 Hf172 3.9175E+13 0.17 Lu172m 4.75E+14 0.56

Lu173 5.00E+13 0.12 Lu172m 2.33E+13 0.06 10 Lu173 3.7881E+13 0.16 Hf172 4.75E+14 0.56

Activation | TOP 10 @ 1 y

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 14

Hg target

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 15

Beam window #2

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 16

•Changing the proton beam energy while maintaining the same beam power does not change substantially the total radioactivity in the target material

•Induced radioactivity and decay heat depend on the target material. Large differences occur mainly for those materials where the thermal neutron activation is the dominant factor.

•Contribution of moderators and reflector has to be accounted since the early design phase.

•Analysis of the differences obtained by using various tools to be continued.

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 17

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 18

Hg target

H*(10) [Sv h-1]

daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 19

top related