acute food insecurity analysis worksheet · 37 diagram 7: acute food i nsecurity analysis worksheet...
Post on 07-May-2018
221 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
37
Diag
ram 7: A
cute Fo
od
insecu
rity An
alysis Wo
rksheet
AcUte FooD inSecURity AnALySiS WoRKSHeet
AnALySiS AReA: ____________________________________ DAte oF AnALySiS:______________ VALiD FoR: [ ] cURRent _______________ [ ]PRoJecteD ______________(which area) (created on) (from when to when) (from when to when)
Section A: Area and HH Analysis Group Definitions
SteP 1: Area Description, HH Analysis Group Definitions, and Map
Brief Area and Livelihood Description
Map and Seasonal calendar of Analysis Area
(insert image of map identifying spatial extent of analysis area and seasonal calendar indicating major seasons and
annual events)
estimated # of People in Area (specify source of pop. data)
CurrentProjected (with assumed
in and out migration)
chronic Food insecurity Level for the area (if available)
HH Analysis Group (HAG) Definitions
{ Identify groups of relatively homogenous households with regard to their food security situation (consider contributing factors and likely outcomes). These HH Analysis Groups will be analysed independently for their respective Phase Classifications.
{ The number of groups will depend upon analytical needs, data availability and desired level of precision.
Label of HAG
Brief Description of each HAG
[Specify Source(s): ]
# of people in HAG
% of pop in HAG
A
B
c
D (...)
Section 5: CLASSIFYING SEVERITYAND CAUSES
38
Section B: classification conclusions and Justification
SteP 4: HH Analysis Group (HAG) classification conclusions – Classify each HH Analysis Group and estimate number and percentage of people in various IPC Phases based on convergence of evidence (from STEP 3). If a single HH Analysis Group is determined to have 2 or more distinct Phases of Household Groups, then indicate partial percentages and numbers.
Label of HAG
current Situation Projected Situation
Phase # of People and % of total pop Summary Justification Phase # of People and % of total pop Summary Justification
A
B
c
D (…)
SteP 5: Phase classification conclusions. – Combine different HH Analysis Groups with the same Phase. If analysis is Area-based only, complete for only the one applicable Phase, and for “estimated # of people and %” use the cumulative number of people in the Area Phase plus people in worse Phases.
Phase
current Situation[Confidence Level for Overall Analysis: ]
Projected Situation[Confidence Level for Overall Analysis: ]
estimated pop or range
% of total pop or range
Justification(key evidence and rationale of directly measured or inferred outcomes: food consumption, livelihood
change, nutritional status, and mortality)
estimated pop or range
% of total pop or range
Justification(evidence and rationale of directly measured or
inferred outcomes: food consumption, livelihood change, nutritional status, and mortality)
1
2
3
4
5
SteP 6: Humanitarian Assistance impact (e.g. humanitarian/disaster relief). – write a brief statement generally describing the type, timing and coverage of assistance to the extent possible. Assess effects of assistance on Phase classification.
Period What are the main humanitarian assistance programmes? Without these programmes would the Area Phase likely be worse than classified?
current Yes/No
Projected Yes/No
SteP 7: Risk Factors to Monitor (List key risk factors to monitor and the monitoring period in brackets)
1. _____________________________ (____) 2. _______________________________ (____) 3. _______________________________ (____) 4. ______________________________ (______)
39
Section c: causes Complete one for Area (reflecting the worst affected households) or for each HH Analysis Group in Phase 3 or higher
SteP 8: Limiting Factors Matrix Specify if for current or Projected: __________________ HH Analysis Group: _____________________________
{ Based on guiding question, indicate the degree to which Availability, Access or Utilization is a limiting factor to people being food secure in the short term.
{ Shade/Colour that cell accordingly and write a brief evidence justification on the cause and effects inside of the cell.
{ Note gender issues and differences where relevant.
Food AvailabilityGuiding Question: Is sufficient food actually or
potentially physically present?
(Consider national and local production, imports, markets, and natural source; and note in the
justification as relevant).
Food AccessGuiding Question: Are households able to sufficiently
access food?
(Consider aspects of physical, financial, and social access, and note in the justification as relevant).
Food UtilizationGuiding Question: Are households making effective
use of food which they have access to?
(Consider aspects of preferences, preparation, storage, and water; and note in the justification as relevant).
Extreme Limiting Factor
No(write brief justification)
No(write brief justification)
No(write brief justification)
Major Limiting Factor
Somewhat, but very little and/or unreliable(write brief justification)
Somewhat, but very little and/or unreliable(write brief justification)
Somewhat, but very little and/or unreliable(write brief justification)
Minor Limiting Factor
Yes, but not quite enough and/or erratic supply(write brief justification)
Yes, but not quite enough and/or erratic supply(write brief justification)
Yes, but not quite enough and/or erratic supply(write brief justification)
Not a Limiting Factor
Yes(write brief justification)
Yes(write brief justification)
Yes(write brief justification)
Section 5: CLASSIFYING SEVERITY AND CAUSES
40
Section D: evidence Documentation and Analysis
SteP 3: Key evidence and conclusions for contributing Factors and outcomes { Document key evidence statement. For each key evidence statement: (i) Indicate Document Code (DC) to link to the Evidence Repository Template; and (ii) Specify reliability score for each evidence statement: 1=somewhat reliable, 2= reliable, 3=very reliable.
{ For example: Market prices increased 200% as compared to same time last year (DC=1, R=2)
{ write summary element conclusion statements and note difference between and within HAGs and gender differences as relevant.
{ For outcome elements, when possible determine the indicative Phase for Area or HAGs.
contributing Factorelements
cURRent PRoJecteD
Hazardsand
Vulnerability
Key Evidence Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/Assumptions Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Food AvailabilityKey Evidence Statement
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area
and each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/Assumptions Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Food Access
Key Evidence Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/Assumptions Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Food Utilizationincluding
Water
Key Evidence Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/Assumptions Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Stability
Key Evidence Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/Assumptions Statement&
Element Conclusion Statement for Area and each HAG (if applicable)
41
outcomeelements
cURRent PRoJecteD
Food consumption
HAG A: HAG B: HAG c: HAG D: AReA: HAG A: HAG B: HAG c: HAG D: AReA:
Key Evidence of directly measured and/or inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/assumptions of inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Livelihood change
HAG A: HAG B: HAG c: HAG D: AReA: HAG A: HAG B: HAG c: HAG D: AReA:
Key Evidence of directly measured and/or inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/assumptions of inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
nutritional Status
AReA: AReA:
Key Evidence of directly measured and/or inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/assumptions of inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Mortality
AReA: AReA:
Key Evidence of directly measured and/or inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)
Key Evidence/assumptions of inferred outcomes
&Element Conclusion Statement for Area and
each HAG (if applicable)Se
cti
on
5:
CLA
SSIF
YIN
GSE
VER
ITY
AN
D C
AU
SES
42
SteP 2: evidence Repository
Document code
•To link to template inStep 3.
•Order is notimportant..
Reference { Multiple pieces of evidence in Step 3 can link to a single source.
Raw evidence { when possible, insert raw evidence (e.g. graph, image, table, quote).
SourceDate
1
2
3
4
5
6
…
top related