addressing school improvement through data ii
Post on 06-Feb-2016
22 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Addressing School Improvement through Data II
Miami-Dade County Public SchoolsPresented by Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit
Curriculum and Instruction2010-2011 (Elementary and Middle Schools) 1
Topics
Overview:•2011 FCAT 2.0
Scores
•Understanding FCAT 2.0/EOC
•Monitoring Tool for FCAT 2.0/EOC Assessed Benchmarks
Hot Links :•FCAT 2.0•EOC Assessments•School Performance
Reports•AYP Reports•FCAT Demographic
Reports
SIP Part II:•2012 SIP, Part II
•Current and Expected Level of Performance
•Criteria for 2012 Expected Level of Performance
Independent work is to submit SIP, Part I 2
Assumptions:You...
are familiar with FCAT 2.0/EOC assessments, school grade and AYP
are familiar with the District Interim Assessments
have some experience looking at the data
love, love, love data!!!
4
NormsListen to others.Engage with the ideas presented.Ask questions.Reflect on relevance to you.Next, set your learning into action.
5
How will scores on the FCAT 2.0 be reported?
Link to Understanding FCAT 2.0 Reports, Spring 20117
Raw Score
Developmental Scale Score(86 to 3008)
Achievement Level
(1 to 5)
Scale Score(100 - 500)
RawScore
WP
MIA
CC
RR
Reading Content Scores
Previous FCAT Reading Scores
8
Scale Score vs. Developmental Scale Score
100 500
G4
100 500
G10
86 3008Developmental Scale Scores
100 500
G3
Scale Score
Grade 3 Grade 10
2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores
1 •FCAT Equivalent Score
2 •Achievement Level
3 •Content Area Scores
Link to FCAT 2.0 FCAT Sheet10
RawScore
V
RA
LA
IR
Reading Content Scores
2011 FCAT 2.0 ScoresRaw Score
Equivalent DSS(86 to 3008)
Equivalent Achievement
Level(1 to 5)
Equivalent Scale Score(100 - 500)
V: VocabularyRA: Reading ApplicationLA: Literary AnalysisIR: Informational Text/Research
Process
11
FCAT 1999
FCAT 2001FCAT
2002FCAT 2010
FCAT 2.0
2011
Base scale of FCAT
1996 SSS
Base scale of FCAT 2.0
2007 NGSSS
FCAT 2.0 Equivalent
Scores
FCAT 2.0
2012
2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores
12
Equipercentile Linking Example• The black and green lines
represent scores on two different assessments
• The lines show how the raw score relates to the percentile rank
• A “black” score of 260 and a “green” score of 340 are both at the 50th percentile rank and are “equivalent”
13
FCAT 1999
FCAT 2001FCAT
2002FCAT 2010
FCAT 2.0
2011
Base scale of FCAT
1996 SSS
Base scale of FCAT 2.0
2007 NGSSS
2011FCAT 2.0
Equivalent Scores
FCAT 2.0
2012
2011 FCAT 2.0 Reading Scores
New FCAT 2.0 Scale – 2012:In January 2012, the new achievement-level cut scores for the FCAT 2.0 will be created for the FCAT 2.0 in reading (G3-10) and mathematics (3-8).
14
2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores
1 •FCAT Equivalent Score
2 •Achievement Level
3 •Content Area Scores
Link to FCAT 2.0 FCAT Sheet15
Grade Ach. Level 1 Ach. Level 2 Ach. Level 3 Ach. Level 4 Ach. Level 5
3 100-258 259-283 284-331 332-393 394-500
4 100-274 275-298 299-338 339-385 386-500
5 100-255 256-285 286-330 331-383 384-500
6 100-264 265-295 296-338 339-386 387-500
7 100-266 267-299 300-343 344-388 389-500
8 100-270 271-309 310-349 350-393 394-500
9 100-284 285-321 322-353 354-381 382-500
10 100-286 287-326 327-354 355-371 372-500
Achievement Levels for the FCAT Reading Equivalent Scale Score
17
Grade Ach. Level 1
Ach. Level 2
Ach. Level 3
Ach. Level 4
Ach. Level 5
3 86-1045 1046-1197 1198-1488 1489-1865 1866-2514
4 295-1314 1315-1455 1456-1689 1690-1964 1965-2638
5 474-1341 1342-1509 1510-1761 1762-2058 2059-2713
6 539-1449 1450-1621 1622-1859 1860-2125 2126-2758
7 671-1541 1542-1714 1715-1944 1945-2180 2181-2767
8 886-1695 1696-1881 1882-2072 2073-2281 2282-2790
9 772-1771 1772-1971 1972-2145 2146-2297 2298-2943
10 844-1851 1852-2067 2068-2218 2219-2310 2311-3008
Achievement Levels for the FCAT Reading Equivalent DSS
Grade Ach. Level 1
Ach. Level 2
Ach. Level 3
Ach. Level 4
Ach. Level 5
3 100-252 253-293 294-345 346-397 398-500
4 100-259 260-297 298-346 347-393 394-500
5 100-287 288-325 326-354 355-394 395-500
6 100-282 283-314 315-353 354-390 391-500
7 100-274 275-305 306-343 344-378 379-500
8 100-279 280-309 310-346 347-370 371-500
Achievement Levels for the FCAT Math Equivalent Scale Score
19
Grade Ach. Level 1
Ach. Level 2
Ach. Level 3
Ach. Level 4
Ach. Level 5
3 375-1078 1079-1268 1269-1508 1509-1749 1750-2225
4 581-1276 1277-1443 1444-1657 1658-1862 1863-2330
5 569-1451 1452-1631 1632-1768 1769-1956 1957-2456
6 770-1553 1554-1691 1692-1859 1860-2018 2019-2492
7 958-1660 1661-1785 1786-1938 1939-2079 2080-2572
8 1025-1732 1733-1850 1851-1997 1998-2091 2092-2605
Achievement Levels for the FCAT Math Equivalent DSS
Achievement Level Definitions
Level 5
indicates success with the content on the FCAT by answering most questions correctly.
Level 4
indicates success with the content on the FCAT by answering most questions correctly, except for the most challenging questions.
Level 3 indicates partial success with the content on the FCAT.
Level 2 indicates limited success with the content on the FCAT.
Level 1 indicates little success with the content on the FCAT.
20
2011 Passing Reading Score
21
2011 Passing Reading Score
• Students in grade 3 must achieve an FCAT Equivalent Score at Level 2 or higher in Reading, or show good cause, to be eligible for promotion.
• Students in grade 10 who entered grade 9 in the 2009-10 SY must score an FCAT Reading Equivalent DSS of 1926 or above on FCAT 2.0 Reading for graduation purposes.
22
2011 Content Scores
23
Sample of FCAT 2.0 Reading Content Area Scores
Content Areas Points Earned
Points Possible
State Mean
Vocabulary – Use multiple strategies to determine the meaning of grade-appropriate vocabulary words. 6 10 7
Reading Application – Use a variety of strategies to comprehend text suitable for the grade level. 9 15 12
Literary Analysis: Fiction and Nonfiction – Identify, analyze, and apply knowledge of the elements of a variety of literary texts, both fiction and nonfiction.
8 15 9
Informational Text and Research Process – Comprehend and interpret informational text from a variety of sources.
6 10 724
Sample of FCAT 2.0 Reading Content Area Scores
Content Areas Points Earned
Points Possible
Avg.%Corr.
Vocabulary – Use multiple strategies to determine the meaning of grade-appropriate vocabulary words. 6 10 60%
Reading Application – Use a variety of strategies to comprehend text suitable for the grade level. 9 15 60%
Literary Analysis: Fiction and Nonfiction – Identify, analyze, and apply knowledge of the elements of a variety of literary texts, both fiction and nonfiction.
8 15 53%
Informational Text and Research Process – Comprehend and interpret informational text from a variety of sources.
6 10 60%25
Sample of FCAT 2.0 Math Content Area Scores
Content Areas (Grade 8) Points Earned
Points Possible
State Mean
Expressions, Equations, and Functions:Analyze and represent linear functions to solve linear equations and systems of linear equations; and solve and graph inequalities.
18 24 20
Geometry and Measurement:Analyze two- and three-dimensional figures by using distance and angle; and compare and convert units of measure.
15 21 17
Number: Operations, Problems, and Statistics:Solve real-world problems using operations on real numbers; and analyze and summarize data sets. 10 15 11
26
Sample of FCAT 2.0 Math Content Area Scores
Content Areas (Grade 8) Points Earned
Points Possible
Avg.%Corr.
Expressions, Equations, and Functions:Analyze and represent linear functions to solve linear equations and systems of linear equations; and solve and graph inequalities.
18 24 75%
Geometry and Measurement:Analyze two- and three-dimensional figures by using distance and angle; and compare and convert units of measure.
15 21 71%
Number: Operations, Problems, and Statistics:Solve real-world problems using operations on real numbers; and analyze and summarize data sets. 10 15 67%
27
Grade 5Total Test Scores Mean Points Earned
Number of
Students
Mean FCAT Equivalent DSS
Mean FCAT Equivalent Scale Score (100-500)
% in each Achievement Level By Content
District Name
1 (474 – 1341)
2 (1342 –
1509)
3 (1510 –
1761)
4 (1762 –
2058)
5 (2059 –
2713)
Percent in
Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Vocabulary
Reading
Application
Literary
Analysis-
Fiction/Nonfiction
Informatio
nal Text/Research
Process
Number of Points Possible 10 15 15 10
STATE 196,559 1649 310 15 15 33 28 9 69 6 12 9 5
MIAMI DADE 26,398 1614 304 18 16 32 26 7 66 6 9 8 7
Sample of 2011 FCAT 2.0 Report: District and Schools
28
Grade 5Total Test Scores Mean Points Earned
Number of
Students
Mean FCAT Equivalent DSS
Mean FCAT Equivalent Scale Score (100-500)
% in each Achievement Level By Content
District Name
1 (474 – 1341)
2 (1342 –
1509)
3 (1510 –
1761)
4 (1762 –
2058)
5 (2059 –
2713)
Percent in
Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Vocabulary
Reading
Application
Literary
Analysis-
Fiction/Nonfiction
Informatio
nal Text/Research
Process
Number of Points Possible 10 15 15 10
STATE 196,559 1649 310 15 15 33 28 9 69 60% 80% 60% 50%
MIAMI DADE 26,398 1614 304 18 16 32 26 7 66 60% 60% 53% 70%
Sample of 2011 FCAT 2.0 Report: District and Schools
29
Practice Handout 1 - Calculate the % correct for each content area.
SchoolPoints Earned By Content Area % Correct By Content Area
Content 1 Content 2 Content 3 Content 4 Content 1 Content 2 Content 3 Content 4
Number of Points Possible 7 21 11 6
1 6 17 8 52 5 17 9 53 4 12 7 34 4 13 6 35 5 17 9 56 6 18 9 57 4 13 7 38 4 14 7 49 4 13 7 4
10 5 14 7 411 4 12 7 412 3 10 5 213 4 13 7 314 4 13 7 415 4 11 6 316 4 14 7 417 4 12 7 318 3 11 6 319 4 12 6 320 4 13 6 321 5 13 7 322 5 13 7 423 6 17 9 524 4 12 7 325 5 13 7 3
30
Practice Handout 1 - Calculate the % correct for each content area.
StudentPoints Earned By Content Area % Correct By Content Area
Content 1 Content 2 Content 3 Content 4 Content 1 Content 2 Content 3 Content 4
Number of Points Possible 7 21 11 6
1 6 17 8 5 86% 81% 73% 83%2 5 17 9 5 71% 81% 82% 83%3 4 12 7 3 57% 57% 64% 50%4 4 13 6 3 57% 62% 55% 50%5 5 17 9 5 71% 81% 82% 83%6 6 18 9 5 86% 86% 82% 83%7 4 13 7 3 57% 62% 64% 50%8 4 14 7 4 57% 67% 64% 67%9 4 13 7 4 57% 62% 64% 67%
10 5 14 7 4 71% 67% 64% 67%11 4 12 7 4 57% 57% 64% 67%12 3 10 5 2 43% 48% 45% 33%13 4 13 7 3 57% 62% 64% 50%14 4 13 7 4 57% 62% 64% 67%15 4 11 6 3 57% 52% 55% 50%16 4 14 7 4 57% 67% 64% 67%17 4 12 7 3 57% 57% 64% 50%18 3 11 6 3 43% 52% 55% 50%19 4 12 6 3 57% 57% 55% 50%20 4 13 6 3 57% 62% 55% 50%21 5 13 7 3 71% 62% 64% 50%22 5 13 7 4 71% 62% 64% 67%23 6 17 9 5 86% 81% 82% 83%24 4 12 7 3 57% 57% 64% 50%25 5 13 7 3 71% 62% 64% 50%
31
Understanding FCAT 2.0/EOC Assessment
32
% Reporting Categories
%Type of Items
% Cognitive ComplexityLength of Test
Type of Reading Passage
Test Design Summary of FCAT 2.0/EOC Assessment
http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/designsummary.pdf 33
Test Design Summary of FCAT 2.0/EOC Assessment
1 •Reporting categories with the approximate percentage of raw score points
2 •Number of words per reading passage by grade level
3 •Percentage of points by cognitive complexity
4 •Types of reading passage and percentage of test
http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/designsummary.pdf 34
FCAT 2.0 Content Categories - Reading Approximate percentage of raw-score points that will
be derived from each content category
Grade Vocabulary Reading Application
Literary Analysis: Fiction &
Nonfiction
Informational Text& Research
Process
3–7 15-25% 25-35% 25-35% 15-25%
8–10 15-25% 20-30% 20-30% 25-35%
http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/designsummary.pdf
Test Length: 50-55 items
35
Grade 5 Next Generation Sunshine State StandardsFCAT 2.0 Reading Benchmarks and Reporting Categories
Reporting Categories Benchmarks Description
Vocabulary LA.5.1.6.3 The student will use context clues to determine meanings of unfamiliar words.
Vocabulary LA.5.1.6.7The student will use meaning of familiar base words and affixes to determine meanings of unfamiliar complex words.
Vocabulary LA.5.1.6.8The student will use knowledge of antonyms, synonyms, homophones, and homographs to determine meanings of words.
Vocabulary LA.5.1.6.9The student will determine the correct meaning of words with multiple meanings in context.
36
Digging into Data
Vocabulary (45%)
LA.5.1.6.7(49%)
Base Words
Items: 2, 5, 655%, 20%,
45%
Root
Items: 4, 1070%, 40%
LA.A.5.1.6.3(48%)
LA.5.1.6.8(41%)
Antonyms
Items: 2, 7, 8, 11
Synonyms
Item 2415%
Content Categories Analysis
Benchmark Analysis
Item Analysis
Identified Students37
Digging into Data
Vocabulary (45%)
LA.5.1.6.7(49%)
Base Words
Items: 2, 5, 655%, 20%,
45%
Root
Items: 4, 1070%, 40%
LA.A.5.1.6.3(48%)
LA.5.1.6.8(41%)
Antonyms
Items: 2, 7, 8, 11
Synonyms
Item 2415%
Content Categories Analysis
Benchmark Analysis
Item Analysis
Identified Students38
FCAT 2.0 Mathematics, Grade 3 - 5Grade Category %
3 Number: Operations, Problems, and Statistics
50
Geometry and Measurement 30 Number: Fractions 20
4 Number: Operations and Problems 45 Geometry and Measurement 30 Number: Base Ten and Fractions 25
5 Number: Base Ten and Fractions 50 Geometry and Measurement 30 Expressions, Equations, and Statistics 20
39
Sample of FCAT 2.0 Math Content Area Scores
Content Areas (Grade 5) Points Earned
Points Possible
State Mean
Number: Base Ten and Fractions:Divide multi-digit whole numbers, including solving real-world problems; and add and subtract decimals, fractions, and mixed numbers.
15 25 20
Geometry and Measurement:Analyze shapes and solve problems related to area, surface area, and volume; and compare units of measure within the same system of measurement; and identify ordered pairs on a coordinate plane.
10 15 12
Expressions, Equations, and Statistics: Simplify expressions and use properties of equality to solve equations and real-world problems; and analyze graphs appropriate to the context of the situation.
6 10 7
40
Grade 5 Next Generation Sunshine State StandardsFCAT 2.0 Math Benchmarks and Reporting Categories
Reporting Categories Benchmarks Description
Number: Base Ten & Fractions MA.5.A.1.1
Describe the process of finding quotients involving multi-digit dividends using models, place value, properties, and the relationship of division to multiplication.
Number: Base Ten & Fractions MA.5.A.1.4
Divide multi-digit whole numbers fluently, including solving real-world problems, demonstrating understanding of the standard algorithm and checking the reasonableness of results.
Number: Base Ten & Fractions MA.5.A.2.1
Represent addition and subtraction of decimals and fractions with like and unlike denominators using models, place value, or properties.
http://curriculum.dadeschools.net/schoolperformancereports.asp 41
FCAT 2.0 Mathematics, Grade 6 - 8Grade Category %
6 Fractions, Ratios, Proportional Relationships, and Statistics
40
Expressions and Equations 40
Geometry and Measurement 20
7 Geometry and Measurement 30
Ratios and Proportional Relationships 25
Number: Base Ten 25
Statistics and Probability 20 8 Expressions, Equations, and Functions 40
Geometry and Measurement 35 Number: Operations, Problems, and Statistics 25 42
Monitoring Tool for FCAT 2.0 Content Assessed Benchmark By Reporting Category
http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Reading Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Mathematics Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Science Grade 5
Click on a subject/grade button below to go to that specific sheet.
Monitoring Tool for FCAT 2.0 Content AssessedGrades 3-5
44
45
Interim Assessment Benchmark Mapping
Go to actionable
data website and click on
Interim AssessmentBenchmark
Mapping
FCAT 2.0/EOC Test Item Specifications• Define the content and format of the
test and test items for item writers and reviewers.
• Provide specific guidelines for the development of all test items used in the FCAT 2.0/EOC assessments.
• Provide information about the benchmarks, the stimulus types, and the test items designed to assess the standards for specific grade level.
• serves to provide all stakeholders with information about the scope and function of the FCAT 2.0/EOC assessments.
http://fcat.fldoe.org/fcat2/itemspecs.asp 47
Sam
ple
Item
Spe
cific
ation
s
48
Benchmark Analysis
Year at a Glance
Five-Year FCATFive-Year AYP
Interim Assessment by
Subgroups
Updated School Performance Report on C & I Website
http://curriculum.dadeschools.net/schoolperformancereports.asp 49
Selection of School Report
http://curriculum.dadeschools.net/schoolperformancereports.asp
ReadingSchool Performance Reports
Benchmark List Description
Grade 6
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 8
MathematicsSchool Performance Reports
Benchmark List Description
Grade 6
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 8
ScienceN/ASchool Performance Reports
Benchmark List Description N/A
N/A
N/A
Grade 8
Grade 8
Step 2. Click on a subject/grade button below to go to that specific sheet.
Step 1. Select a school from the drop down list below.
School and Subject Selection
50
List of Schools
Average/Mean Score
Average % Correct
Percent Proficient
What is the difference?
51
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600N
umbe
r of S
tude
nts
Raw Score Distribution: Grade 3 Math of Fall IA, 2010-11
Average Score is 17.7 or Average % Correct of 59
67% of Students
36% of Students
P at 70% CutoffProficient at 50% Cutoff
52
3 7 10 13 17 20 23 27 30 33 37 40 43 47 50 53 57 60 63 67 70 73 77 80 83 87 90 93 97 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Grade 3
3 5 8 10 13 15 18 20 23 25 28 30 33 35 38 40 43 45 48 50 53 55 58 60 63 65 68 70 73 75 78 80 83 85 88 90 93 95 98 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Grade 4
53
10 Minutes Break
54
Recap
Overview:
• 2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores
• Understanding FCAT 2.0/EOC
• Monitoring Tool for FCAT 2.0/EOC Assessed Benchmarks
Hot Links :
• FCAT 2.0• EOC
Assessments• School
Performance Reports
• AYP Reports• FCAT
Demographic Reports
SIP Part II:
• 2012 SIP, Part II
• Current and Expected Level of Performance
• Criteria for 2012 Expected Level of Performance
55
2012 Expected Improvements
Part II of SIP – Goal Areas
56
2011-2012 Statewide Assessment PlanFCAT
Writing (4, 8, 10)
Reading Retakes
(fall, spring)
Math Retakes
(fall, spring) (CBT*)
FCAT 2.0
Reading (3-10) (SS)
Math (3-8) (SS)
*CBT in G7
Science (5, 8) (B)
EOC (CBT*)
Algebra(SS)
Geometry(B)
Biology(B)
US History (FT)
Selected HS*CBT: Computer-Based Testing
Link to 2011-2012 Statewide Assessment Schedule 57
Expected Level of Performance
Student Learning
Reading
Math
Writing
Science
Demographics
Attendance
Suspensions
Dropout Prevention
Parent Involvement
58
SIP Reading/Math Goals
Overall Proficient
Learning Gains
Sub-groups proficient
• G1 %L3• G2 %L4 &5
• G3 Overall• G4 Lowest25%
• G5A-5D %L3-5
59
2010-2011 School Improvement Plan Current and Expected Level of Performance
Read
ing
Mat
h
Writ
ingScience
Atten
danc
e
Susp
ensio
n
Dropou
t
Preve
ntion
60
School Accountability
• Meeting High Standards• Learning Gains
School Grade
• Meeting High Standards• Total and SubgroupsAYP
61
School GradingGrade Points
A525-800
B495-524
C435-494
D395-434
F0-394
Meeting high standards (400 points)
Reading: %L3-5
Math: %L3-5
Science: %L3-5
Writing: %L4-6
Making learning gains(400 points)
Reading• % Making learning
gains for all
• % Making learning gains for Low25%
Math• % Making learning
gains for all
• % Making learning gains for Low25%
62
Adequate Yearly Progress
Total Group
Reading (%L3-5)
Math (%L3-5)
Writing (%L3-6)
Graduation Goal
Subgroups
Reading (%L3-5)
Math (%L3-5)
Writing (%L3-6)
63
For a school to meet AYP, how many criteria must be met?
64
39 Components Criteria (NA, No, Yes)
65
GroupParticipation Met
(Tested 95%) Proficiency Met
Reading Math Reading MathTOTAL 1 1 1 1WHITE 2 2 2 2BLACK 3 3 3 3HISP. 4 4 4 4ASIAN 5 5 5 5Am. Ind. 6 6 6 6
ED 7 7 7 7ELL 8 8 8 8SWD 9 9 9 9
School GradeTotal Group
Graduation
Total Group
WritingTotal Group
Other AYP Criteria
Number of Schools with % Criteria Met on 2010 AYP Components
100% (39
)
97%
(38)
95%
(37)
92%
(36)
90%
(35)
87%
(34)
85%
(33)
82%
(32)
79%
(31)
77%
(30)
74%
(29)
72%
(28)
69%
(27)
67%
(26)
64%
25)
62%
(24)
59%
(23)
54%
(21)
49%
(19)
0
50
10080
3527 29 33 32 33 38
3221 26
16 126 2 2 2 1 1
Num
ber o
f Sch
ools
Total Schools: 428
% Criteria Met (Number of Components)
19%
66
A B C D F NG Total0
250
500
72
3 0 0 0 5
80131
4683
35 15 38
348AYP-Yes AYP-No
Num
ber o
f Sch
ools
2010 AYP Status and 2010 School Grades - District
School Grades
Total number of schools: 428
67
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Benchmark
Year%Proficiency Targets
Reading Math
2009-10 65 68
2009-10 72 74
2010-11 79 80
2011-12 86 862012-13 93 93
2013-14 100 10068
http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/default.asp?report=AYP
69
Percent of AYP Criteria Met is 74%
Divide the result by 39, then multiply by 100
(29 / 39) * 100 = 74.35%
Subtract the number of “No” from 39
39 minus 10 = 29
Counts the number of components with “No”
There are 10 components with “No”
Percent Criteria Calculation
70
What percent of the criteria was met for this school?
71
What percent of the criteria was met for this school?Practice Handout 2
72
Percent of AYP Criteria Met is 77%
Divide the result by 39, then multiply by 100
(30 / 39) * 100 = 76.92%
Subtract the number of “No” from 39
39 minus 9 = 30
Counts the number of components with “No”
There are 9 components with “No”
Percent Criteria Calculation
73
Growth Model ProvisionApplied if the school or subgroup did not meet the proficiency targets
or the safe harbor proficiency targets
Safe Harbor Provision
Applied if the school or subgroup did not meet the proficiency targets
Annual Proficiency Targets
2011-12: Reading is 86% 2011-12: Math is 86%
Proficiency Targets in Reading/Math
74
Number of Schools Met 2010 Reading Proficiency Target
Subgroup NO NA Yes-AB Yes-SH Yes-GM Grand Total
WHITE 7 346 68 7 428
BLACK 156 229 10 30 3 428
HISPANIC 144 92 135 39 18 428
AMERICAN INDIAN 428 428
ASIAN 428 428ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 226 32 96 58 16 428
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 132 221 31 29 15 428
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 108 287 2 28 3 428
TOTAL 230 139 46 13 42876
Number of Schools Met 2010 Math Proficiency Target
Subgroup NO NA Yes-AB Yes-SH Yes-GM Grand Total
WHITE 3 346 76 3 428
BLACK 141 230 14 43 428
HISPANIC 132 93 154 43 6 428
AMERICAN INDIAN 428 428
ASIAN 428 428
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 215 32 109 69 3 428
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 117 221 59 27 4 428
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 101 288 4 34 1 428
TOTAL 231 146 47 4 42877
AYP Safe Harbor Sample School
Safe Harbor Section
Growth Model Section
Annual Proficient
78
2010 AYP Report
• See your 2010 AYP results online
• Go to http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata
• Under “Hot Links”, click “AYP Reports
• See handout pages 5-6
http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/default.asp?report=AYP
79
The percent of non-proficient students decreased by at least 10%
from the preceding year in the subject being evaluated.
% Safe Harbor Proficiency Target
80
Safe Harbor Proficiency Target
2012Target
Proficient
30+7=37%
Non-proficient
70-7=63%
2011Proficient
Proficient
30%
Non-proficient
10% of 70 = 7
70%
81
Safe Harbor Proficiency Target
2012Target
Proficient
45+5.5=50.5
Non-proficient
55-5.5=49.5
2011Proficient
Proficient
45%
Non-proficient
10% of 55 = 5.5
55%
82
Safe Harbor Test (Practice Handout 3)
School2010
% Prof.Reading
2010% Non-Proficient
201010% of
Non-Proficient2011 Safe Harbor Proficiency Target
1 47
2 49
3 58
4 45
5 38
6 64
7 50
8 63
9 35
10 20
11 42
12 24
13 38
14 43
15 30 83
Safe Harbor Test (Answers)
School2010
% Prof.Reading
2010% Non-Proficient
201010% of
Non-Proficient2011 Safe Harbor Proficiency Target
1 47 53 5.3 52.3
2 49 51 5.1 54.1
3 58 42 4.2 62.2
4 45 55 5.5 50.5
5 38 62 6.2 44.2
6 64 36 3.6 67.6
7 50 50 5.0 55.0
8 63 37 3.7 66.7
9 35 65 6.5 41.5
10 20 80 8.0 28.0
11 42 58 5.8 47.8
12 24 76 7.6 31.6
13 38 62 6.2 44.2
14 43 57 5.7 48.7
15 30 70 7.0 37.0 84
School grade is not “D” or “F” (school)
Increase the graduation rate by 2% or maintain at 85% or higher
subgroup(s) and school
Improve performance in writing by 1% or remain at 90% or highersubgroup(s) and school
Attain at least 95% participation rate in reading and math
all subgroups and school
Safe Harbor Gate Keepers(School and subgroup must meet all of the following requirements)
85
Now, let’s take a look
SIP Part II
Current and Expected Level of Performance
86
SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science
Goal 1Students achieving proficiency
(FCAT Level 3)
2011Current level of
performance30%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
Goal 2Students achieving above
proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5)
2011Current level of
performance10%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
87
SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science
Goal 1Students achieving proficiency
(FCAT Level 3)
2011Current level of
performance30%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
Goal 2Students achieving above
proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5)
2011Current level of
performance10%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
88
2012 SIP Expected Level of Performance
2011
L34540%
Goal 1: L3
30%Goal 2: L45
10%
L1260%
10% of L12 = 6
2012 Expected Level of
Performance
L34540+6=46
L330+4.2=
34.2
L4510+1.8=
11.8
L1260-6=54
10% of 60=6
%L3 Plus 7% of L1&2
%L45 Plus 3% of L1&2
The percent of non-proficient students
decreased by at least 10% from the
preceding year
89
SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science
Goal 1Students achieving proficiency
(FCAT Level 3)
2011Current level of
performance30%
2012Expected level of
performance
34
Goal 2Students achieving above
proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5)
2011Current level of
performance10%
2012Expected level of
performance
12
90
SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science
Goal 1Students achieving proficiency
(FCAT Level 3)
2011Current level of
performance15%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
Goal 2Students achieving above
proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5)
2011Current level of
performance5%
2012Expected level of
performance
?
91
2012 SIP Expected Level of Performance
2011
L34520%
Goal 1: L3
15%Goal 2: L45
5%
L1280%
10% of L1&2 = 8
2012 Expected Level of
Performance
L34520+8=28
L315+5.6=
20.6
L455+2.4=
7.4
L1280-8=72
10% of 80=8
%L3 Plus 7% of L1&2
%L45 Plus 3% of L1&2
The percent of non-proficient students
decreased by at least 10% from the
preceding year
92
SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science
Goal 1Students achieving proficiency
(FCAT Level 3)
2011Current level of
performance15%
2012Expected level of
performance
21
Goal 2Students achieving above
proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5)
2011Current level of
performance5%
2012Expected level of
performance
7
93
94
2011-2012 SIP Part II – Expected Level of Performance Criteria
See handout on page 10 for Grades 3-8 and page 11 for high schoolCriteria for Elementary
and Middle Schools
Criteria for High Schools
Calculation Sheet
Reading (G3-10)/Math G (3-8)/ScienceGoal Current
Performance 2012 Improvement Criteria
1% Level 3
%Levels 3-5 is less than 86% % Level 3 plus by 7% of (Levels 1 and 2)
%Levels 3-5 is at or higher than 86 Maintain
2% Levels 4 and 5
%Levels 3-5 is less than 86%
% Levels 4 and 5 plus by 3% of (Levels 1 and 2)
%Levels 3-5 is at or higher than 86 Maintain
95
2011 - 2012 Expected Level of Performance – Calculation Sheet
96
• Go to http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata
• Under “Hot Links”, click “FCAT Demographic Reports”
• For school data follow handout pages 7-9
97
2012 SIP Expected Level of Performance Calculation
Reading and Math Goals (G3-8)
Goal CurrentPerformance 2012 Improvement Criteria
3 &4% of
Students Make
Learning Gains
0% - 60% %Learning Gains plus 10 percentage points
61% - 90% %Learning Gains plus 5 percentage points
91% - 100% Maintain
98
Reading and Math Goals (G3-8)
Goal CurrentPerformance2012 Improvement Criteria
5A-5DSubgroups
0% - 85% % proficient plus 10% of non-proficient (Levels 1 and 2)
86% - 100% Maintain
99
Attendance GoalData
Source Goal 1 CurrentPerformance
2012 Improvement Criteria
COGNOS (As of
June 1, 2011)
Average Daily Attendance Rate
P01.00 - 90.99 Increase by 3% points.
P91.00 - 93.99 Increase by 1% point
P94.00 - 96.99 Increase by 0.5% point
P97.00 - 100 MaintainExcessive Absences (10 or more)
# of Students Reduce by 5 Percent
Excessive Tardiness (10 or more)
# of Students Reduce by 5 Percent
100
Suspension GoalData
Source Goal 1 CurrentPerformance
2012 Improvement
Criteria
COGNOS (As of June
1, 2011)
In-School Suspensions
Number of Suspensions
Reduce by 10 percent
Number of Students (unduplicated)
Reduce by 10 percent
Out-of-School Suspensions
Number of Suspensions
Reduce by 10 percent
Number of Students (unduplicated)
Reduce by 10 percent
101
Can you explain the difference between
percent and percentage point?
102
Percent (%) vs. Percentage Point
Current percent proficient
To increase the current proficiency by 10%, what would be the new percent proficient value?
To increase the current proficiency by 10 percentage points, what would be the new percent proficient value?
20
10% of 20 = 20*.10=2
20+10=30New % = 20+2=22
75
10% of 75 = 75*.10=7.5
75+10=85New % = 75+7.5=82.5
103
Percent (%) vs. Percentage point (HO 4)Current percent
proficient
To increase the current proficient by 10%, what would be the new percent proficient value?
To increase the current proficient by 10 percentage points, what would be the new percent proficient value?
1. 30%2. 50%3. 65%4. 25%5. 80%6. 43%7. 15%8. 78%9. 15%
10. 37%104
Percent (%) vs. Percentage point
Current percent
proficient
To increase the current proficient by 10%, what would be the new percent proficient value?
To increase the current proficient by 10 percentage points, what would be the new percent proficient value?
1. 30% 30+(30*10/100)=33 30+10=402. 50% 50+(50*10/100)=55 50+10=603. 65% 65+(65*10/100)=71.5 65+10=754. 25% 25+(25*10/100)=27.5 25+10=355. 80% 80+(80*10/100)=88 80+10=906. 43% 43+(43*10/100)=47.3 43+10=537. 15% 15+(15*10/100)=16.5 15+10=258. 78% 78+(78*10/100)=85.8 78+10=889. 15% 15+(15*10/100)=16.5 15+10=25
10. 37% 37+(37*10/100)=40.7 37+10=47105
Formulate key questions Obtain data to answer them Find the storyline to bring it all together Determine priority areas for action Share the data with the staff Seek technical assistance if needed Celebrate your achievement results! Use the data to communicate, inform, provoke,
and persuade ... and Improve Your System!
Tips for Analyzing Data
106
Do you know what your students should know and be able to do each year in
math/reading/science/writing?
Can you identify the gap between where students are right now in relation to high
standards?
What instructional strategies can you use to accelerate students to attain high
standards?
Essential Questions
107
How prepared are you to effectively use assessment to determine ways to alter
instruction to meet high standards?
Do you have effective classroom-level assessments to help you clearly determine
whether students are meeting high standards?
Essential Questions
108
Please complete the evaluation
form109
top related