alamo heights ccm item #6 ppt 265 e edgewood

Case # 651FSignificance & Compatibility

Review265 E. EdgewoodPresented By: Jason Lutz

Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting

Agenda Item # 6November 14, 2016

CASE NO. 651F Consider a request of Justin Johnson,

Veryan Inc., owner, for the significancereview of the existing main structure andcompatibility review of the proposedreplacement structure located at 265Edgewood E under Demolition ReviewOrdinance No. 1860 in order to demolish100% of the existing main structure andconstruct a new single family residence.

SUMMARY Demolish 100% of the existing main

structure and construct a new singlefamily residence.

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A Located on the north side of E. Edgewood

Place, between Vanderhoeven and N. NewBraunfels

5

PROJECT LOCATION

6

POLICY ANALYSISLOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 9,116 9,116Main House Footprint 1,001 2,007Front Porch 53 173Side Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear Porch 180Garage Footprint 850 850Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 1,904 / 9,116 3,210 / 9,116Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 21% 35%

7

POLICY ANALYSISFLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 9,116 9,116Main House 1st Floor 1,001 2,007Main House 2nd Floor 820Garage 1st Floor 850 850Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area 1,851 / 9,116 3,677 / 9,116Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 20% 40%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

25’ 5” in height (max allowed 33’) Complies with regulations concerning

setbacks, height, and looming standards Building Materials Hardie siding Hardie shingles Standing seam metal roof

9

TREE REMOVAL (1) 23” Arizona Ash (non-heritage tree) No mitigation required

10

POLICY ANALYSIS

The existing 1,001sq. ft. home was builtin 1945

No evidence that the home was built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

11

EXISTING SITE PLAN

12

EXISTING STRUCTURE

13

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

14

FRONT ELEVATION

15

REAR ELEVATION

16

RIGHT ELEVATION

17

LEFT ELEVATION

18

19

20

21

ARB RECOMMENDATION ARB reviewed project on October18, 2016 Found no significance in the existing structure Found the proposed structure to be compatible

with the neighborhood Approved the project as presented

22

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (2)

Oppose: (1)

QUESTIONS?