analyzing the competency of mathematical modeling in physics (girep 2015)
Post on 07-Aug-2015
128 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
+
Analyzing the Competency of Mathematical Modeling in Physics
Edward Redish Department of Physics
University of Maryland USA July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
+ Outline Mathematics is an essential competency
for learning physics Math as the language of physics:
Mathematics in a physics context is not the same language as it is in a pure math context
Making meaning with mathematics Mathematics as a way of knowing in physics Case study:
Implications for interdisciplinary instruction Conclusions
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
2
+ Mathematics in physics and scientific epistemology
Scientific thinking is all about epistemology – deciding what we know and how we know it.
In physics, mathematics became closely tied with our epistemology beginning in ~1700.
Mathematics plays a significant role in physics instruction, even in introductory classes. (Not always in a good way, however.)
We don’t just calculate with math, we “make meaning” with it, think with it, and use it to create new physics.
It has been identified as a critical scientific competency both by EUR-LEX2006 and the US biology community (Bio2010, SFFP, Vision & Change)
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
4
+ Unpacking ...
As physics students learn the culture of physics and grow from novice to expert, many have trouble bridging what they learn in math with how we use math in physics .
Many instructors are distressed and confused when our students succeed in math classes but fail to use those same tools effectively in physics.
For those of us who practice physics, either as teachers or researchers, our knowledge of physics is deeply blended with mathematics.
We may find it hard to unpack our blended knowledge and understand what students find difficult.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
5
+... Using Physics Education Research My research group has been studying maths
in physics at the university level for ~20 years in many contexts. Engineering students in introductory physics Physics majors in advanced classes Biology students in introductory classes, both with mixed populations
and in a specially designed class for bio and pre-med students.
Data (mostly qualitative) Videos of problem-solving interviews Ethnographic data of students solving real HW problems
in real classes, either alone or in groups. Some multiple-choice questions on exams or with clickers.
Theory Resources Framework* – built on ideas from education, psychology,
neuroscience, sociology, and linguistics research
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
6
* Redish, “How should we think about how our students think?”, Am. J. Phys. 82(2014) 537-551.
+ We often say that “mathematics is the language of physics”, but...
What physicists do with maths is different from what mathematicians do with it.
Mathematicians and physicists load meaning onto symbols differently and this has profound implications.*
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
8
* Redish & Kuo, “Language of physics, language of math”, Sci. & Ed 25:5-6 (2015) 561-590.
+ Our processing of equations is more complex than in a math class.
We link our equations with physical systems — which adds information on how to interpret the equation
We use symbols that carry extra information not otherwise present in the mathematical structure of the equation
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
9
+ Examples: Units & SigFigs What are we doing when we specify
the “units” of a quantity? We are identifying our symbol not just as a number but as
a measurement – that brings physical properties along with it.
What about significant figures? Why do we bother talking about them now that we have calculators? When we multiply 5.42 x 8.73 in a 6th grade arithmetic
class we want something different from what we want when we are measuring the area of a (5.42 cm) x (8.73 cm) sheet of silicon.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
10
In math terms, we are determining which irreducible representation of the 3-parameter scaling group SxSxS it transforms by.
Since every measurement has an uncertainty, it propagates to the product, leaving many digits shown by the calculator as “insignificant figures”.
+ Example: Functional dependence A very small charge q0 is placed at a point somewhere in space. Hidden in the region are a number of electrical charges. The placing of the charge q0 does not result in any change in the position of the hidden charges. The charge q0 feels a force, F. We conclude that there is an electric field at the point where q0 is placed that has the value E0 = F/q0.
If the charge q0 were replaced by a charge –3q0, then the electric field at the point would be
a) Equal to –E0 b) Equal to E0 c) Equal to –E0/3 d) Equal to E0/3 e) Equal to some other value not given here. f) Cannot be determined from the information given. July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
Nearly half of 200 students chose this answer.
Given in lecture in algebra-based physics . 11
+ Huh?
The topic had been discussed in lecture and students had read text materials showing a mathematical derivation.
When asked, most students could cite the result, “The electric field is independent of the test charge that measures it.”
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
12
E r( ) = Fq0
Enet
q0
+ What’s going on?
Many students treated the physics as a pure math problem:
If A = B/C what happens to A if C is replaced by -3C?
They ignored the fact that F here is not a fixed constant, but is the force felt by charge q0 and therefore depends on the value of q0.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
13
+ Example: Lots of parameters
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
14
When a small organism is moving through a fluid, it experiences both viscous and inertial drag.
The viscous drag is proportional to the speed and the inertial drag to the square of the speed. For small spherical objects, the magnitudes of these two forces are given by the following equations:
Fv = 6πμRvFi = CρR
2v2
For an organism (of radius R) is there ever a speed for which these two forces have the same magnitude?
Given as a discussion question in a class for introductory physics for bio students. (A year of calculus was a pre-requisite for the class.)
+ Many students were seriously confused and didn’t know what to do next.
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
15
“Should I see if I can find all the numbers on the web?”
“I don’t know how to start.” “Well, it says ‘Do they ever have the same magnitude?’
How do you think you ought to start?
“Set them equal?” “OK. Do it.”
“I don’t know what all these symbols mean.” “Well everything except the velocity are constants
for a particular object in a particular situation.”
....[concentrating for almost a minute...] “Oh! So if I write it .... Av = Bv2... Wow! Then it’s easy!”
+ Making meaning with mathematics It’s done differently in physics and math!
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław 16
+The structure
Our examples suggest that the critical difference in maths as pure mathematics and maths in a physics context is the blending of physical and mathematical knowledge.
How does this work?
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
17
+ The structure of mathematical modeling:
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
18
• Often these all happen at once – intertwined. (the diagram is not meant to imply an algorithmic process)
• In physics classes, processing is often stressed and the remaining elements shortchanged or ignored.
+The process of modeling is actually quite complex
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
19
Shown at this meeting by Pospiech from the work of Uhden, Karam, & Geyer
+In physics, math integrates with our physics knowledge and does work for us
It lets us carry out chains of reasoning that are longer than we can do in our head, by using formal and logical reasoning represented symbolically Calculations Predictions Summary and description of data Development of theorems and laws
Our math also codes for conceptual knowledge Functional dependence Packing concepts Epistemology
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
20
+ Functional dependence
Fick’s law of diffusion
The Hagen-Poiseuille equation for fluid flow in a cylindrical pipe
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
21
Δr2 = 6DΔt
ΔP = 8μLπR4
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟Q
From a course in physics for biology and life-science students. These functional dependences have profound implications for biology.
+ Packing Concepts into Equations: Equations as a conceptual organizer
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
22
aA =
FAnet
mA
Force is what you have to pay attention to when considering motion
What matters is the sum of the forces
on the object being considered
The total force is “shared” to all parts of the object
These stand for 3 equations that are independently true for each direction.
You have to pick an object to pay attention to
Forces change an object’s velocity
Total force (shared over the parts of the mass) causes an object’s velocity to change
+ A theoretical structure for analyzing these ideas:
In physics, we “make physical meaning” with maths. How does that work?
In physics, maths are a critical piece of how we decide we know something (our epistemology). How does that work?
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
23
+What does “meaning” mean? Draw on cognitive semantics – the study of
the meaning of words in the intersection of cognitive science and linguistics. Some key ideas:
1. Embodied cognition – Meaning is grounded in physical experience.
2. Encyclopedic knowledge – Webs of associations build meaning.
3. Contextualization – Meaning is constructed dynamically in response to perceived context.
4. Blending – New knowledge can be created by combining and integrating distinct mental spaces.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
25
+ Mathematical meaning in maths.
One way embodiment allows math to feel meaningful is with symbolic forms*: associating symbol structure with relations abstracted from (embodied) physical experience Parts of a whole: = + + ... Base + change: = + Balancing: =
A second way maths build meaning is through association via multiple mathematical representations Equations Numbers Graphs
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
26
* Sherin, Cog. & Instr, 19 (2001) 479-541.
+ Mathematical meaning in physics Physicists tend to make meaning
of mathematical symbology by associating symbols with physical measurements.
This allows connections to physical experience and associations to real world knowledge.
Examples: Symbolic quantities in physics often have units,
meaning they are different types of quantities that cannot be added or equated. (time ≠ space)*
Quantities may be considered as variables or constants depending on what problem is being considered.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
27
* However, there is context dependence! (How far is it from Wroc aw to Prague? About three and a half hours.)
+ Example: A vector line integral* A square loop of wire is
centered on the origin and oriented as in the figure. There is a space-dependent magnetic field
If the wire carries a current, I, what is the net force on the wire?
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
B = B0yk
28
* Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics (Addison-Wesley, 1999).
+ Two paths to a solution
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
29
Student B I’m pretty sure they
want us to do the vector line integral around the loop.
It’s pretty
straightforward. The sides do cancel,
but I get the top and bottom do too, so the answer is zero.
F = I dL × B∫
Student A Huh! Looks pretty
simple – like a physics 1 problem.
The sides cancel so I can just do on the top and bottom where B is constant.
Gonna get
F = IL × B
F = IL2B0 jFrom a video of two physics majors working together to solve a problem in a third-year E&M course.
+ No argument! Student A immediately folded his cards
in response to student B’s more mathematically sophisticated reason and agreed she must be right.
Both students valued (complex) mathematical reasoning (where they could easily make a mistake) over a simple (and compelling) argument that blended math and physics reasoning.
The students expectations that the knowledge in the class was about learning to do complex math was supported by many class activities.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
30
+ Analyzing mathematics as a way of knowing Epistemological resources
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław 31
+ Example 3: A rocket is taken from a point A to a point B near a mass m. Consider two(unrealistic) paths 1 and 2 as shown. Calculate the work done by the mass on the rocket on each path. Use the fundamental definition of the work
not potential energy. Mathematica may or may not be helpful. Feel free to use it if you choose (though it is not necessary for the calculations required).
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
32
+ What’s happening? During this discussion three students
are talking at cross purposes.
They are each looking for different kinds of “proofs” than the others are offering.
They use different kinds of reasons (warrants*) to support their arguments.
Eventually, they find mutual agreement – after about 15 minutes of discussion!
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
33
* S. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument (Cambridge UP, 1958)
+
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
34 From a video of three physics majors working together to solve a problem in a third-year Math Methods course. The problem is intended to show how the path independence of work comes about for conservative forces.
S1: what’s the problem? You should get a different answer from here for this... (Points to each path on diagram) S2: No no no S1: They should be equal? S2: They should be equal S1: Why should they be equal? This path is longer if you think about it. (Points to two-part path) S2: Because force, err, because work is path independent. S1: Well, OK, well is this— what was the answer to this right here?( Points to equation) S2: Yeah, solve each integral numerically S1: Yeah, what was that answer? ...
S1: Matching physical intuition with the
math
S2: Relying on a
remembered theorem
+ I’ll compare it to the number of...OK, the y-one is point one five. S1: I, just give me the, just sum those up... I just want the whole total... this total quantity there... (Points to integrals again) S2: Oh, it was point four. S3: No, that’s the other one [direct path]. S1: you gave it to me before, I just didn’t write it down. S3: Oh I see, point, what, point six one eight S1: See, point six one eight, which is what I said, the work done here should be larger S2: No, no no, no no no S3: the path where the x is changing S2: Work is path independent. S1: How is it path independent? S2: by definition S3: Somebody apparently proved this before we did...
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
35 1
r2dr
2
3 2
∫ = 1
y2 + 9dy
1
3
∫ + 1
x2 +1dx
1
3
∫
S3: Trusting the
mathematical calculation
+Analytic tools for studying epistemology
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
36
Epistemological resources* Generalized categories
of “How do we know?” warrants.
Epistemological framing** The process of deciding what e-resources
are relevant to the current task. (NOT necessarily a conscious process.)
Epistemological stances A coherent set of e-resources
often activated together
*Bing & Redish, Phys. Rev. ST-PER 5 (2009) 020108; 8 (2012) 010105. ** Hammer, Elby, Scherr & Redish, in Transfer of Learning (IAP, 2004)
+ Careful!
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
37
These are NOT intended to describe distinct mental structures. Rather, we use them to emphasize different aspects of what may be a unitary process: activating a subset of the knowledge you have to a particular situation. Warrant – focuses on a specific argument, typically using
particular elements of the current context. (“Since the path integral of a conservative force is path independent, these two integrals will have the same value.”)
Resource – focuses on the general class of warrant being used. (“You can trust the results in a reliable source such as a textbook.”)
Framing – focuses attention on the interaction between cue and response. (You decide you need to carry out a calculation.)
+Some physics e-resources
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
38
Knowledgeconstructed
from experience and perception (p-prims)
is trustworthy
Algorithmic computational steps lead to a trustable
result
Information from an authoritative
source can be trusted
A mathematical symbolic representation faithfully
characterizes some feature of the physical or geometric
system it is intended to represent.
Highly simplified examples can yield
insight into complex mathematical
representations
Physical intuition (experience & perception)
Calculationcan be trusted
By trusted authority
Physical mapping to math
(Thinking with math)
Value of toy models
There are powerful principles that can be
trusted in all situations
Fundamental laws
IntroPhysicscontext
Except for the first, each of these often involve math.
+ An a meta-epistemological result: Coherence
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
39
Multiple ways of knowing applied to the same situation
should yield the same result
+ Consider previous examples in this language
E = F/q
q -3q
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
40
Calculationcan be trusted
Physical mapping
to math(Thinking with math)
Calculationcan be trusted
Physical mapping
to math(Thinking with math)
By trusted authority
Calculationcan be trusted
+Epistemological framing Depending on how students interpret
the situation they are in and their learned expectations, they may not think to call on resources they have and are competent with.
This can take many forms: “I’m not allowed to use a calculator on this exam.” “It’s not appropriate to include diagrams or equations
in an essay question.” “This is a physics class. He can’t possibly expect me
to know any chemistry.”
This can coordinate strongly with affective responses.
This becomes particularly important when students and faculty choose different ways of knowing.
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
41
+ The language of epistemology
This language provides nice classifications of reasoning – both what we are trying to teach and what students actually do.
But can it provide any guidance for instructional design?
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
42
+ Case Study: Implications for interdisciplinary instruction
Lessons from NEXUS/Physics
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław 43
+ NEXUS/Physics: An introductory course for life science majors Create prototype materials
An inventory of open-source instructional modules that can be shared nationally .
Interdisciplinary Coordinate instruction in biology, chemistry, physics, and maths.
Competency based Teach generalized scientific skills so that it supports instruction in the other disciplines.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
44
* Redish et al., NEXUS Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists, Am. J. Phys. 82:5 (2014) 368-377. http://www.nexusphysics.umd.edu
+Epistemological resources
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
45
Knowledgeconstructed
from experience and perception (p-prims)
is trustworthy
Physical intuition (experience & perception)
Information from an authoritative
source can be trusted
By trusted authority
The historical fact of natural selection leads
to strong structure-function relationships
in living organisms
Many distinct components of
organisms need to be identified
Comparison of related organisms yields
insight
Learning a large vocabulary
is useful
Categorization and classification
(phylogeny)
There are broad principles that govern
multiple situationsHeuristics
Living organisms are complex and require multiple
related processes to maintain life
Life is complex(system thinking)
Function implies structure
IntroBiologycontext
In intro bio, typically none of these often involve math.
+ Missing!
These are critical components woven deeply into every physics class!
These are not only weak or missing in many bio students, they see them as contradicting resources they value.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
46
Value of toy models
Fundamental laws
Life is complex(system thinking)
Function implies structure
+ This demands some dramatic changes! We cannot take for granted that students
will value toy models. We have to justify their use.
We cannot take for granted that students will understand or appreciate the power of principles like conservation laws (energy, momentum, charge). We have to teach the idea explicitly.
We have to create situations in which students learn to see the value of bringing in physics-style thinking with biology-style thinking in order to gain biological insights. (“Biologically authentic” examples)
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
47
+Disciplinary epistemological framing: Discussion – Why do bilayers form?
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
48
Prompt: How can phospholipids spontaneously self-assemble into a lipid bilayer?
+Disciplinary epistemologies
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
49
Hollis: “in terms of bio, the reason why it forms a bilayer is because polar molecules need to get from the outside to the inside”
Cindy: “if it’s hydrophobic and interacting with water, then it's going to create a positive Gibb's free energy, so it won't be spontaneous and that’s bad..[proceeds to unpack in terms of positive (energetic) and negative (entropic) contributions to the Gibbs free energy equation.]”
Hollis: I wasn't thinking it in terms of physics. And you said it in terms of physics, so it matched with biology.
Physical mapping
to math(Thinking with math)
Function implies structure
Satisfaction(smile,
fist pump)
+
6/24/15 MathBench Workshop, College Park
50
IntroPhysicscontext
IntroBiologycontext
Physical mapping to math
(Thinking with math)
Teleology justifies
mechanismSatisfaction(smile,
fist pump)
Interdisciplinary coherence
seeking
“Interdisciplinary coherence” – • Coordinated resources from
intro physics and biology • Blended context • Positive affect
+ Epistemological stances – “Go-to” e-framings
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
51
Both students and faculty may have developed a pattern of choosing particular combinations of e-resources.
The epistemological stances first chosen by physics instructors and physics students may be dramatically different – even in the common context of a physics class.
+
The figure shows the PE of two interacting atoms as a function of their relative separation. If they have the total energy shown by the red line, is the force between the atoms when they are at the separation marked C attractive or repulsive?
C
B A Total energy
r
Potential Energy
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
52 Example: Epistemological stances
Given as a discussion question in a class for introductory physics for bio students. (A year of calculus was a pre-requisite for the class.)
+ How two different professors explained it when students got stuck.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
53
Remember! (or here)
At C, the slope of the U graph is positive.
Therefore the force is negative – towards smaller r.
So the potential represents an attractive force when the atoms are at separation C.
F = −∇U F = − dUdr
This figure was not actually drawn on the board by either instructor.
+Wandering around the class while students were considering the problem, I got a good response using a different approach.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
54
Think about it as if it were a ball on a hill. Which way would it roll? Why?
What’s the slope at that point?
What’s the force?
How does this relate to the equation
F = − dUdr
+ A conflict between the epistemological stances of instructor and student can make teaching more difficult.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
55
Calculationcan be trusted
By trusted authority
Physical mapping
to math(Thinking with math)
Physical intuition (experience & perception)
Physical mapping to math
(Thinking with math)
Mathematical consistency
(If the math is the same, the analogy is good.)
Physics instructors seem most comfortable beginning with familiar equations – which we use not only to calculate with, but to code and remind us of conceptual knowledge.
Most biology students lack the experience blending math and conceptual knowledge, so they are more comfortable beginning with physical intuitions.
+ Teaching physics standing on your head
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
56
For physicists, math is the “go to” epistemological resource – the one activated first and the one brought in to support intuitions and results developed in other ways.
For biology students, the math is decidedly secondary. Structure/function relationships tend to be the “go to” resource.
Part of our goal in teaching physics to second year biologists is to improve their understanding of the potential value of mathematical modeling. This means teaching it rather than assuming it.
+ Summary: Analytic tools for studying math in physics
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
58
The structure of mathematical modeling The conceptual components of blending physical
and mathematical knowledge.
Epistemological resources Generalized categories of “How do we know?” warrants.
Epistemological framing The process of deciding what e-resources are relevant to
the current task. (NOT necessarily a conscious process.)
Epistemological stances A coherent set of e-resources often activated together
+ Conclusion An analysis of how math is used
in physics, including both an unpacking of what professionals do and an analysis of how students respond, can give insight into student difficulties reasoning with math.
Such an analysis has implications for how we understand what our students are doing, what we are actually trying to get them to learn, and (potentially) how to better design our instruction to achieve our goals.
July 10, 2015 GIREP-Wrocław
59
top related