annotations on arxiv to support review and comment

Post on 03-Jul-2015

474 Views

Category:

Education

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Short presentation at Hypothes.is/Sloan workshop on Peer Review. Gives some arXiv background, some past and existing work relating to commentary and review on arXiv, and plans for annotation experiments

TRANSCRIPT

Annotations on arXiv to support review

and comment

Simeon Warner

(Cornell University Library)

Peer Review Meeting, Washington DC,

May 15-16, 2014

4th largest “publisher”*

Publisher New articles per year

Elsevier ~260k (2012, [1])

Wiley ~180k (2013, pers. comm.)

Springer ~150k (2009?, [2])

arXiv ~100k (2014, projected)

Taylor & Francis ~60k (2010, [3])

[1] http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/scholarly-pubs-(%23168)%20Elsevier%20submission.pdf[2] http://www.springer.com/us/partners/society-zone-issues/springer-s-author-satisfaction-program/4496[3]http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/?p=1816* if we are happy comparing apples and oranges, and publish = to make public

Cost and effort

• 2.75 FTE admin, 2.5 FTE developer

• 149 volunteer moderators

– correct classification, appropriateness

• mgmt. + advisory boards

CY2014 budget $885,987

=> budget per new article < $9

FastFair

Efficient

(Let’s not get hung up on things like open access for now. For the current discussion that

is just an obvious part of fair and efficient)

Commentary on arXiv

• Comment articles

• Separate discussion sites:

- CosmoCoffee

- Journal Club for Condensed Matter Physics

- ...

- Facebook experiment

- Blogs and trackbacks

Comment and review (by peers) is an essential part of

scholarship

The question is whether our fast, fair and efficient scholarly communication infrastructure

can assist with these elements of the process

arXiv experiments

1. Allow users to see annotations on arXiv articles or formally published versions of same article– handle arXiv formats and versioning

– ids: arXiv <-> DOI <-> ADS <-> Inspire

2. Allow interaction with authenticated, external annotation services to support overlap journals or journal clubs– filtered access

opt-in

authenticated/curated

external

(and tied to ORCID iD)

Similarly to tie to formally published version. Bidirectional.

Q. When not appropriate? How to indicate?

That’s all folks...

simeon.warner@cornell.edu

@zimeon

top related