art%3a10.1007%2fs10900-012-9630-4

Post on 04-Jun-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    1/8

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    2/8

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    3/8

    and individually recruited to complete the pre-/post-

    assessments.

    Program Design

    START combined instruction in Photovoice methods with

    educational sessions addressing asthma self-management.

    Program goals were two-fold: (1) enable participants to

    identify and address multi-level factors affecting asthma

    self-management, and (2) improve community asthma

    awareness through the production, dissemination and

    evaluation of two student-directed PSAs.

    Phase I (Photovoice)

    Two initial sessions were designed to introduce student

    participants to program goals and fundamentals of ethno-

    graphic research. In subsequent sessions, student partici-

    pants were given basic training from a photographyinstructor as well as daily photography and journaling

    assignments. Over the remaining weeks, student partici-

    pants framed their day-to-day lives through journal entries

    and photographs in order to identify and discuss answers to

    the following research questions: (1) What is your com-

    munity? (2) What things in your community affect your

    health? (3) What things in your community hurt or help

    your asthma? (4) What are the most significant barriers to

    your asthma management? (5) How can you improve or

    control your asthma? Additionally, five of the twenty ses-

    sions included asthma education components led by pedi-

    atricians and medical students. For further detail onprogram development and design, see Gupta et al. [33].

    Phase II (Public Service Announcements)

    In the second phase of the program, photography and

    videography experts worked with student participants to

    incorporate student photographs and storyboard concepts

    into two PSAs via a 4-week iterative, student-directed

    process This process began with students brainstorming

    potential narrative structures for each video, filling in blank

    boxes, which constituted a timeline for each PSA, with

    their pictures and commentary. Each week the videogra-

    pher would synthesize students footage and storyboard

    suggestions into a pair of draft PSAs and bring them back

    to the students in the following week for refinement until

    students were satisfied. Each final PSA, described below

    and available at http://youtu.be/bEp2fakobtM and http://

    youtu.be/yyCQRUG2Zfk, focused on a single question

    What is asthma? and What can my community do to help

    kids with asthma? Students showcased the PSAs to peers

    and community members at a school-wide premiere.

    Public Service Announcements

    PSA 1, What is Asthma? (1:07 min)

    The PSA starts with the question Did you know? fol-

    lowed by three asthma statistics, a definition of asthma,

    three consequences of asthma, and an example of how to

    control asthma. Cartoon animations and student faces fillthe screen, accompanied by student commentary. The PSA

    ends with students emphasizing their ability to do any-

    thing anyone else can if I take care of my asthma and

    provides a resource for viewers desiring more information.

    PSA 2, What can my Community do to Help Kids

    with Asthma? (1:28 min)

    The PSA depicts a female, African-American high school

    student in black and white standing in front of a collection

    of photographs with slow music playing. One-by-one she

    drops photographs depicting six community asthma trig-gers onto a table. The music becomes upbeat, the images

    turn to color, and the student now drops photos that depict

    four community asthma aids. The PSA ends encouraging

    viewers to become active in reducing community asthma

    triggers and again provides a resource for viewers desiring

    more information.

    Outcome Measures

    Phase I (Photovoice)

    Phase I outcomes are reported in Gupta et al. [33].

    Phase II (Public Service Announcements)

    Pre-PSA, immediate post-PSA, and 4-month post-PSA

    follow-up assessments were conducted to evaluate changes

    in community members asthma knowledge immediately

    before and after as well as 14 months after viewing the

    PSAs. Assessments evaluated participant knowledge of the

    definition of asthma, statistics presented in the PSAs, and

    asthma-related morbidity, as well as community aids and

    triggers. Demographic characteristics and data on prior

    experiences with asthma were also collected. In addition,

    self-reported changes in awareness and behavior were

    documented during the 14 month follow-up telephone

    survey.

    Statistical Analysis

    Relative frequencies of correct responses for the pre-PSA,

    immediate post-PSA, and 4-month post-PSA follow-up

    assessments were calculated. T-tests were performed to

    J Community Health (2013) 38:463470 465

    1 3

    http://youtu.be/bEp2fakobtMhttp://youtu.be/yyCQRUG2Zfkhttp://youtu.be/yyCQRUG2Zfkhttp://youtu.be/yyCQRUG2Zfkhttp://youtu.be/yyCQRUG2Zfkhttp://youtu.be/bEp2fakobtM
  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    4/8

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    5/8

    Eighty-six percent (n = 31) of participants felt they knew

    more about asthma at follow-up, with participants citing

    community asthma aids (22.5 %) and the prevalence of

    asthma (19.4 %) as the most important facts imparted by

    the PSAs.

    Seventy-five percent (n = 27) of follow-up telephone

    call respondents reported that the PSAs improved their

    awareness of community triggers and aids, with smoking

    being most commonly identified (51.9 %). Thirty-nine per-

    cent (n=14) of these respondents reported behavior

    changes in response to the PSAs, most often in the form of

    smoking less (35.7 %). Other reported behavior modifica-

    tions included using public transportation andmaking efforts

    to improve air quality by planting trees/or other plants.

    Discussion

    Student-directed PSAs, developed as part of the START

    intervention, were found to significantly increase asthma

    Table 2 Knowledge scores pre-/post-viewing PSAs

    Item Correct response (%)

    All participants(n =228)

    Had asthma and/or household member with asthma(n =89)

    Pre Post Gain Pre Post Gain

    Asthma definition

    Lungs* 31.1 75.0 ?43.9 47.2 98.9 ?51.7

    Inflammation* 7.0 52.2 ?45.2 9.0 62.9 ?53.9

    Asthma statistics

    Prevalence of asthma among children in Chicago* 7.0 66.7 ?59.6 10.1 84.3 ?74.2

    Prevalence of asthma among children in the neighborhood* 11.8 63.6 ?51.8 12.4 80.9 ?68.5

    Economic cost of asthma per year in the US* 3.5 55.3 ?51.8 4.5 69.7 ?65.2

    Asthma morbidity

    Miss school* 1.3 19.3 ?18.0 0.0 25.8 ?25.8

    Hospitalization* 5.7 13.2 ?7.5 10.1 15.7 ?5.6

    Stigmatization* 0.9 3.9 ?3.1 2.2 6.7 ?4.5

    Decreased participation in sports 17.5 5.7 -11.8 21.3 9.0 -12.4

    Death 37.7 18.0 -19.7 59.6 27.0 -32.6Asthma attack 60.1 39.5 -47.0 82.0 42.7 -39.3

    Community triggers

    Alcohol/drugs* 6.6 51.3 ?44.7 10.1 69.7 ?59.6

    Tobacco smoke* 56.1 75.9 ?19.7 79.8 102.2 ?22.5

    Stress* 5.3 13.6 ?8.3 6.7 21.3 ?14.6

    Air pollution* 53.9 61.8 ?7.9 71.9 82.0 ?10.1

    Violence* 4.4 9.2 ?4.8 6.7 15.7 ?9.0

    Stigmatization* 2.6 3.5 ?0.9 3.4 3.4 0.0

    Strenuous exercise 8.8 3.5 -5.3 11.2 5.6 -5.6

    Strong odors 10.1 2.2 -7.9 18.0 5.6 -12.4

    Weather 11.8 1.8 -10.1 24.7 4.5 -20.2

    Allergens 19.7 3.9 -15.8 30.3 7.9 -22.5

    Dirty environment 28.1 10.1 -18.0 40.4 12.4 -28.1

    Community aids

    Stress-free environment* 0.9 25.4 ?24.6 0.0 32.6 ?32.6

    Access to healthcare* 24.1 38.2 ?14.0 39.3 50.6 ?11.2

    Supportive community* 5.3 7.0 ?1.8 5.6 12.4 ?6.7

    Clean air* 16.2 14.5 -1.8 19.1 13.5 -5.6

    Asthma education/awareness* 14.0 9.6 -4.4 21.3 12.4 -9.0

    Healthy lifestyle* 15.8 4.8 -11.0 25.8 4.5 -21.3

    * Factors addressed in the PSAs

    J Community Health (2013) 38:463470 467

    1 3

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    6/8

    knowledge among community members, irrespective of age,

    gender, or race. Increased knowledge persisted at 14 months

    post-PSA follow-up. Of the thirty-six participants who

    were successfully contacted for the follow-up survey, nearly

    40 % reported meaningful behavior-change in response to the

    PSAs.

    Many asthma interventions have embraced the socio-

    ecological model and thus incorporate home, school, andcommunity-based components to address the multi-factorial

    nature of asthma self-management [18,34]. However, the

    majority of school-based asthma interventions have targeted

    pre-adolescent youth, often with mixed results [35]. Among

    the few school-based interventions designed specifically for

    adolescents, the Classical Health Promotion model pre-

    vails, in which a prescribed, knowledge-based curriculum is

    presented in a didactic manner by experts [36].

    Though our intervention incorporated such didactic

    sessions, most learning was imparted through student-led

    and hands-on investigation into factors affecting asthma in

    the context of each students unique environment. Webelieve that this more collaborative, community-based

    approach may have helped to bridge the gap between each

    individual student and his or her community [37], making

    each PSA all the more personally relevant. A similar

    approach was used by Shah et als Adolescent Asthma

    Action(Triple A) program [38]. Much like our intervention,

    Shah et al. found the program to be well-received and

    effective at increasing asthma knowledge; Shah also

    observed improvements in asthma-related quality of life

    among participants. Future work will be needed to link the

    effect of a Photovoice intervention like ours to specific

    clinical outcomes.While most Photovoice interventions seek to create

    community-level change, few efforts have been made to

    evaluate the impact of such projects within the community

    [39]. In the grand majority of Photovoice projects with an

    advocacy component, public photo exhibitions are utilized

    to present participants photos to community stakeholders

    [39]. To our knowledge, START is the first program to uti-

    lize Photovoice techniques as an instrument to create PSAs

    for the purpose of community health promotion. Public

    service announcements have long been used as a social

    marketing tool in public health [40], and may be particularly

    effective in communities with low literacy and limited

    educational opportunities, such as is often the case in low-

    income urban environments. Additionally a substantial

    CBPR literature supports the idea that PSAs generated from

    within the community may be more effective at reaching

    community members both by nature of relevant content and

    acceptable format to the intended audience [41].

    It is important to note that the PSAs were effective at

    improving knowledge among community members of all

    age groups, not just the students peers. In fact, knowledge

    scores increased most among older participants (ages

    2145 years). Such findings hold promise for the role of

    future school-based interventions in the promotion of

    healthy behaviors at the individual and community level.

    Taking Photovoice methods one step further, a recent

    project conducted by Catalani et al. [42] incorporated

    participatory videography, which is suggested to be an

    effective way to mobilize community in the production anddissemination of findings [43]. Given the dynamic nature

    of video and the creative flexibility it affords, as well as

    rapidly decreasing costs, we recommend that future inter-

    ventions incorporate participatory videography into the

    START curriculum. This approach will likely expand the

    students purview while allowing for more robust integra-

    tion of their footage directly into the PSAs, further

    empowering participants. Moreover, the increasing ubiq-

    uity of video-editing software provides students, with little

    prior experience, an opportunity to create their own

    PSAs with relatively little expert supervision. Finally, the

    growing popularity of video sharing sites likeyoutube.com,which provides automatic captioning and translation of

    videos into dozens of languages, provides a means to

    disseminate video content to an ever-growing online

    audience.

    This study has a number of limitations. The PSAs

    focused predominately on negative environmental factors

    that contribute to asthma exacerbations and were reflective

    of the personally relevant factors affecting asthma identi-

    fied by students in this feasibility pilot study. Additionally,

    since few adults identified their highest level of education

    completed, we are not able to draw evidence-based con-

    clusions about the effectiveness of the PSAs in relationshipto the education level of viewers. Moreover, only a small

    portion of the total number of PSA viewers completed the

    follow-up phone assessments. Finally, given that all mea-

    sures of behavior change were self-reported and only

    administered to a minority of participants, further evalua-

    tion is needed to determine whether asthma knowledge and

    awareness gained from student-directed PSAs really per-

    sists over time, and whether this knowledge and awareness

    translates into measurable behavior change leading to

    improved asthma outcomes.

    Conclusion

    Student-directed Public Service Announcements (PSAs)

    were found to significantly increase community asthma

    knowledge, with some evidence that this effect may persist

    over time and lead to positive behavior change. Photovoice

    and media production techniques were effective in engag-

    ing adolescent studentsan underserved and often disen-

    franchised populationin asthma health education through

    468 J Community Health (2013) 38:463470

    1 3

    http://youtube.com/http://youtube.com/
  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    7/8

    the development and dissemination of PSAs. Participatory

    techniques in the development of student-directed PSAs

    hold promise for future public health initiatives, especially

    those targeting adolescent youth in the context of

    community.

    Acknowledgments We thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

    for their support of this research.

    References

    1. Akinbami, L.J., Moorman, J.E., Bailey, C., Zahran, H.S., King,M., Johnson, C.A., & Liu, X. (2012) Trends in Asthma Preva-lence, Health Care Use, and Mortality in the United States,20012010. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Data

    Brief, 94.

    2. Akinbami, L. J., & Schoendorf, K. C. (2002). Trends in childhoodasthma: Prevalence, health care utilization, and mortality. Pedi-atrics, 110(2 Pt 1), 315322.

    3. Calmes, D., Leake, B. D., & Carlisle, D. M. (1998). Adverseasthma outcomes among children hospitalized with asthma inCalifornia. Pediatrics, 101(5), 845850.

    4. Akinbami, L. J., Moorman, J. E., Garbe, P. L., & Sondik, E. J.(2009). Status of childhood asthma in the United States,19802007. Pediatrics, 123(Suppl 3), S131S145.

    5. Gupta, R. S., Carrion-Carire, V., & Weiss, K. B. (2006). Thewidening black/white gap in asthma hospitalizations and mor-tality. Journal of Allergy in Clinical Immunology, 117(2),351358.

    6. Gupta, R. S., Zhang, X., Sharp, L. K., Shannon, J. J., & Weiss,K. B. (2008). Geographic variability in childhood asthma prev-alence in Chicago. Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology,121(3), 639645 e631.

    7. Bakirtas, A. (2009). Acute effects of passive smoking on asthmain childhood. Inflammation and Allergy: Drug Targets, 8(5),353358.

    8. Tzivian, L. (2011). Outdoor air pollution and asthma in children.Journal of Asthma, 48(5), 470481.

    9. Kozyrskyj, A. L., Kendall, G. E., Jacoby, P., Sly, P. D., &Zubrick, S. R. (2010). Association between socioeconomic statusand the development of asthma: Analyses of income trajectories.

    American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 540546.10. Hill, T. D., Graham, L. M., & Divgi, V. (2011). Racial disparities

    in pediatric asthma: A review of the literature. Current Allergyand Asthma Reports, 11(1), 8590.

    11. Gupta, R. S., Ballesteros, J., Springston, E. E., Smith, B., Martin,M., Wang, E., et al. (2010). The state of pediatric asthma inChicagos Humboldt Park: A community-based study in two

    local elementary schools. BMC Pediatrics, 10, 45.12. Gupta, R. S., Zhang, X., Springston, E. E., Sharp, L., Curtis, L.,Shalowitz, M., et al. (2011). The association between communitycrime and childhood asthma prevalence. Annals of Allergy,

    Asthma & Immunology, 104, 299306.13. Quinn, K., Kaufman, J. S., Siddiqi, A., & Yeatts, K. B. (2010).

    Parent perceptions of neighborhood stressors are associated withgeneral health and child respiratory health among low-income,urban families. Journal of Asthma, 47(3), 281289.

    14. Gupta, R. S., Zhang, X., Sharp, L. K., Shannon, J. J., & Weiss,K. B. (2009). The protective effect of community factors onchildhood asthma. Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunol, 123(6),1297-1304 e1292.

    15. Rhee, H., Belyea, M. J., & Elward, K. S. (2008). Patterns ofasthma control perception in adolescents: Associations withpsychosocial functioning. Journal of Asthma, 45(7), 600606.

    16. Michaud, P. A., Frappier, J. Y., & Pless, I. B. (1991). Compliancein adolescents with chronic disease. Archives francaises de

    pe diatrie, 48(5), 329336.17. Whitman, S., Williams, C., & Shah, A. (2004). Sinai health

    systems community health survey: Report 1. Chicago: SinaiHealth System.

    18. Clark, N. M. (2012). Community-based approaches to controllingchildhood asthma.Annual Review of Public Health, 33, 193208.

    19. Wolf, F. M., Guevara, J. P., Grum, C. M., Clark, N. M., & Cates,C. J. (2003). Educational interventions for asthma in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1), CD000326.

    20. Clark, N. M., Brown, R., Joseph, C. L., Anderson, E. W., Liu, M.,& Valerio, M. A. (2004). Effects of a comprehensive school-based asthma program on symptoms, parent management, grades,and absenteeism. Chest, 125(5), 16741679.

    21. Tinkelman, D., & Schwartz, A. (2004). School-based asthmadisease management. Journal of Asthma, 41(4), 455462.

    22. Crocker, D. D., Kinyota, S., Dumitru, G. G., et al. (2011).Effectiveness of home-based, multi-trigger, multicomponentinterventions with an environmental focus for reducing asthmamorbidity: A community guide systematic review. American

    Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(2 Suppl 1), S5S32.23. Thyne, S., Rising, J., Legion, V., & Love, M. (2006). The Yes

    We Can Urban Asthma Partnership: A medical/social model forchildhood asthma management. Journal of Asthma, 43(9),667673.

    24. Williams, S., Wharton, A. R., Falter, K. H., French, E., & Redd,S. C. (2003). Retention factors for participants of an inner-citycommunity-based asthma intervention study. Ethnicity and Dis-ease, 13(1), 118125.

    25. Nicholas, S., Jean-Louis, B., Ortiz, B., Northridge, M.,Shoemaker, K., Vaughan, R., et al. (2005). Addressing the child-hoodasthma crisisin Harlem: TheHarlem Childrens Zone AsthmaInitiative.American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 245249.

    26. Brown, M., Reeves, M., Meyerson, K., & Korzeniewski, S.(2006). Randomized trial of a comprehensive asthma educationprogram after an emergency department visit. Annals of Allergy,

    Asthma & Immunology, 97(1), 4451.27. Stout, J., White, L., Rogers, L., McRorie, T., Morray, B., Miller-

    Ratcliffe, M., et al. (1998). The Asthma Outreach Project: Apromising approach to comprehensive asthma management.

    Journal of Asthma, 35(1), 119127.28. Anderson, M. E., Freas, M. R., Wallace, A. S., Kempe, A.,

    Gelfand, E. W., & Liu, A. H. (2004). Successful school-basedintervention for inner-city children with persistent asthma.

    Journal of Asthma, 41(4), 445453.29. Magzamen, S., Patel, B., Davis, A., Edelstein, J., & Tager, I. B.

    (2008). Kickin Asthma: School-based asthma education in anurban community. Journal of School Health, 78(12), 655665.

    30. Warne, M., Snyder, K., & Gillander Gadin, K. (2012). Photo-

    voice: An opportunity and challenge for students genuine par-ticipation. Health Promot Int.31. Brazg, T., Bekemeier, B., Spigner, C., & Huebner, C. E. (2011).

    Our community in focus: The use of photovoice for youth-drivensubstance abuse assessment and health promotion. Health Pro-motion Practice, 12(4), 502511.

    32. Green, L. W., & Mercer, S. L. (2001). Can Public HealthResearchers and Agencies Reconcile the Push from FundingBodies and the Pull from Communities? American Journal ofPublic Health, 91(12), 19261929.

    33. Gupta, R.S., Lau, C.H., Springston, E.E., Warren, C.M., Mears,C.J., Dunford, C.M., Sharp, L.K., & Holl, J.L. (2012) PerceivedFactors Affecting Asthma among Adolescents: Experiences and

    J Community Health (2013) 38:463470 469

    1 3

  • 8/13/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs10900-012-9630-4

    8/8

top related