bcom project[1]
Post on 05-Apr-2018
223 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
1/76
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS OF TURNOVER TAX COLLECTION
METHODS ON IMPROVED TAX COMPLIANCE
A CASE STUDY OF MSMEs IN EMBU COUNTY
MUTO VICTOR MURIITHI
(HD231-037-0012/2009)
RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF
COMMERCE (ACCOUNTING OPTION), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND ECONOMIC STUDIES, SCHOOL OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND
DEVELOPMENT, JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE
AND TECHNOLOGY
AUGUST, 2011
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
2/76
DEDICATION
This is my original and has not been presented for any of the study programs in
any other university.
Signature: ________________________ Date: ______________________
Name: Victor M. Muto
HD231-037-0012/2009
This proposal has been submitted for examination with my approval as the
university supervisor.
Sign: __________________________
Mr. G. G. Kamau
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
3/76
DEDICATION
I want to dedicate this piece of work to my parents, Mr. & Mrs. Ngondi, my
siblings, Martin, Kevin and Diana for their unending support, my best friend
Yvvn for her encouragement during preparation of this document and to Mr. D.
Nyaga for the inspiration.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
4/76
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Foremost, I want to thank the Almighty God for the providence of strength and
good health that has enabled me to complete this proposal successfully.
I thank my university supervisor, Mr. G. G. Kamau for his unending sacrifice
and dedication of time to guide me and to ensure that I was intellectually
instinct.
Special thanks to my parents, Mr. & Mrs. Ngondi who have provided financial,
physical and moral support, and to my siblings, Martin, Kevin and Diana for
their cooperation.
I also extend my appreciation to Mr. D. Nyaga who inspired me to write this
project proposal and for his steadfast support.
I thank my best friend, Yvvn for her daily encouragement and also show my
gratitude to members of Eagles Club, Embu College Campus, Ian, Davie,
Esther, Elijah and Joy for their support.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
5/76
ABSTRACT
The main objective of this research was to analyze the impacts of turnover tax
collection methods on improved tax compliance. Turnover tax is a new tax
regime that came into effect on 1st January 2008 after introduction through the
Finance Act 2007. This study set out to verify how true that statement is.
Technology, simplicity of tax collection methods and tax penalties were the
factors that were used to carry out this research and their impact on turnover tax
collection methods thus influencing improved tax compliance.
The research study was carried out in Embu County targeting all micro, small
and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The sample population included 40
businesses in Embu County (Embu East, North and West Districts). The research
design used is descriptive design with instrumentation of questionnaires;
sampling design used is simple random sampling.
The research data collected from the enterprises of study is analyzed and
presented in tables and informational charts and discussed in details. From the
research carried out, it was observed that the turnover collection methods have
an influence on improved tax compliance.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
6/76
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Declarationi
Dedication.ii
Acknowledgment..iii
Abstract.iv
List of Tablesvii
List of figuresviii
Acronyms....ix
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION1
1.1.Background of the study.1
1.2.Statement of the problem........8
1.3.Objectives of the study........9
1.4.Research questions..9
1.5.Justification.10
1.6.Scope...11
1.7.Limitations of the study..11
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE
REVIEW12
2.1.Introduction......12
2.2. TheoreticalReview..14
2.3. Critique of the existing literature relevant to the study34
2.4. Summary andGaps..35
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
7/76
2.5. ConceptualFramework36
CHAPTER 3:
METHODOLOGY...41
3.0.Introduction..41
3.1 ResearchDesign41
3.2 TargetPopulation..41
3.3 SamplingFrame42
3.4 Sample & Sampling Technique42
3.5Instruments42
3.6 Data collectionprocedure.............................42
3.7 Data processing and analysis42
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH FINDINGS &
DISCUSSION...43
4.1.Introduction..............................43
4.2. ResponseRate..43
4.3. Registration ofbusiness...43
4.4. Quantitative DataAnalysis..44
4.5. Qualitative Analysis55
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1.Introduction..56
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
8/76
5.2.Summary..56
5.3.Conclusions..58
5.4.Recommendations59
APPENDIX 1:
REFERENCES60
APPENDIX 2:
APPENDICES.63
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
9/76
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1: Registration ofbusiness.44
Table 4.2: Age ofbusiness..45
Table 4.3:Ownership..46
Table 4.4: Annualsales..46
Table 4.5: TaxRegime47
Table 4.6: Identification of simplification procedures related toTOT..48
Table 4.7: Use oftechnology.48
Table 4.8: Integration of technological equipment inbusiness.49
Table 4.9: Filing of returns49
Table 4.10: KRA onlineservices..50
Table 4.11: Convenience ofETR......................................................................50
Table 4.12: Do you know when youre supposed to file your tax returns51
Table 4.13: How often do you file returns ontime...52
Table 4.14: TaxProcedures...52
Table 4.15: Which tax procedures have contributed to your timely filing ofreturns.53
Table 4.16: Simplification of taxprocedures.53
Table 4.17: Are you aware of the penalties charged under the Kenya TaxLaws..54
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
10/76
Table 4.18: Have you ever been penalized for late submission ofreturns.55
Table 4.19: Stringency ofpenalties.55
Table 4.20: Influence of penalties on early submission ofreturns.55
Table 4.21: Effectiveness of taxpenalties..........................................................56
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
11/76
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Data from investment climatesurveys.26
Figure 2.2: Conceptualframework.36
Figure 4.1: Annualsales.46
Figure 4.2: Convenience of ETR50
Figure 4.3: Simplification of taxprocedures..53
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
12/76
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
13/76
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This chapter consists of the background of the study, the statement of the
problem, the objective of the study, the research questions, the significance of
the study, scope of the study, and limitations of the study.
1.1 Background of the study
Taxes are considered a problem by everyone. Not surprisingly, taxation
problems date back to earliest recorded history.
1.1.1 TAX HISTORY CHRONOLOGY
EGYPT
During the various reins of the Egyptian Pharaohs tax collectors were known as
scribes. During one period the scribes imposed a tax on cooking oil. To insure
that citizens were not avoiding the cooking oil tax scribes would audit
households to insure that appropriate amounts of cooking oil were consumed and
that citizens were not using leavings generated by other cooking processes as a
substitute for the taxed oil.
GREECE
In times of war the Athenians imposed a tax referred to as eisphora. No one
was exempt from the tax which was used to pay for special wartime
expenditures. The Greeks are one of the few societies that were able to rescind
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
14/76
the tax once the emergency was over. When additional resources were gained
by the war effort the resources were used to refund the tax. Athenians imposed a
monthly poll tax on foreigners, people who did not have both an Athenian
Mother and Father, of one drachma for men and a half drachma for women. The
tax was referred to as metoikion
ROMAN EMPIRE
The earliest taxes in Rome were customs duties on imports and exports called
portoria.Caesar Augustus was considered by many to be the most brilliant tax
strategist of the Roman Empire. During his reign as "First Citizen" the publican
were virtually eliminated as tax collectors for the central government. During
this period cities were given the responsibility for collecting taxes. Caesar
Augustus instituted an inheritance tax to provide retirement funds for the
military. The tax was 5 percent on all inheritances except gifts to children and
spouses. The English and Dutch referred to the inheritance tax of Augustus in
developing their own inheritance taxes. During the time of Julius Caesar a 1%
sales tax was imposed. During the time of Caesar Augustus the sales tax was 4
percent for slaves and 1 percent for everything else.
Saint Matthew was a publican (tax collector) from Capernaum during Caesar
Augustus reign. He was not of the old publican but hired by the local
government to collect taxes. In 60 A.D. Boadicea, queen of East Anglia led a
revolt that can be attributed to corrupt tax collectors in the British Isles. Her
revolt allegedly killed all Roman soldiers within 100 miles; seized London; and
it is said that over 80,000 people were killed during the revolt. The Queen was
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
15/76
able to raise an army of 230,000. The revolt was crushed by Emperor Nero and
resulted in the appointment of new administrators for the British Isles.
GREAT BRITAIN
The first tax assessed in England was during occupation by the Roman Empire.
Lady Godiva
Lady Godiva was an Anglo-Saxon woman who lived in England during the 11th
century. According to legend, Lady Godiva's husband Leofric, Earl of Mercia,
promised to reduce the high taxes he levied on the residents of Coventry when
she agreed to ride naked through the streets of the town. When Rome fell, the
Saxon kings imposed taxes, referred to asDanegeld, on land and property. The
kings also imposed substantial customs duties.
The 100 years War (the conflict between England and France) began in 1337 and
ended in 1453. One of the key factors that renewed fighting in 1369 was the
rebellion of the nobles of Aquitaine over the oppressive tax policies of Edward,
The Black Prince. Taxes during 14th century were very progressive; The 1377
Poll tax noted that the tax on the Duke of Lancaster was 520 times the tax on the
common peasant.
Under the earliest taxing schemes an income tax was imposed on the wealthy,
office holders, and the clergy. A tax on movable property was imposed on
merchants. The poor paid little or no taxes. Charles I was ultimately charged
with treason and beheaded. However, his problems with Parliament came about
because of a disagreement in 1629 about the rights of taxation afforded the King
and the rights of taxation afforded the Parliament. The King's Writ stated that
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
16/76
individuals should be taxed according to status and means. Hence the idea of a
progressive tax on those with the ability to pay was developed very early.
Other prominent taxes imposed during this period were taxes on land and
various excise taxes. To pay for the army commanded by Oliver Cromwell,
Parliament, in 1643, imposed excise taxes on essential commodities (grain, meat,
etc.). The taxes imposed by Parliament extracted even more funds than taxes
imposed by Charles I, especially from the poor. The excise tax was very
regressive, increasing the tax on the poor so much that the Smithfield riots
occurred in 1647. The riots occurred because the new taxes lowered rural
laborers ability to buy wheat to the point where a family of four would starve. In
addition to the excise tax, the common lands used for hunting by the peasant
class were enclosed and peasant hunting was banned (hooray for Robin Hood).
A precursor to the modern income tax we know today was invented by the
British in 1800 to finance their engagement in the war with Napoleon. The tax
was repealed in 1816 and opponents of the tax, who thought it should only be
used to finance wars, wanted all records of the tax destroyed along with its
repeal. Records were publicly burned by the Chancellor of the Exchequer but
copies were retained in the basement of the tax court.
COLONIAL AMERICA
Colonists were paying taxes under the Molasses Act which was modified in
1764 to include import duties on foreign molasses, sugar, wine and other
commodities. The new act was known as the Sugar Act. Because the Sugar Act
did not raise substantial revenue amounts, the Stamp Act was added in 1765. The
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
17/76
Stamp Act imposed a direct tax on all newspapers printed in the colonies and
most commercial and legal documents.
1.1.2 Tax in Kenya
Turnover tax (TOT) was introduced in Kenya under Finance Act 2006 and was
supposed to be effective from 1st January 2007. The law was found to be
defective and it was reintroduced through Finance Act 2007 with effect from 1st
January 2008. TOT is an indirect tax chargeable at the rate of 3% of a businesss
total sales or tax on turnover. It targets businesses with turnover between
Kshs.500, 000 and Kshs.5, 000, 000 annually. For TOT purposes business
include any trade, profession or vocation, and every manufacturer, adventure and
concern in the nature of nature, but does not include:
i. Employment income
ii. Exempt incomes under the First Schedule of the Income Tax Act cap 470
iii. Business incomes subject to final withholding tax i.e. bank interest,
dividends, income earned from government bonds and treasury bills and
payments made to non-residents
iv. Persons in receipt of business incomes but with annual turnover below
Kshs.500, 000
v. Limited companies
vi. Rental income
vii. Professional management fees
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
18/76
The tax period is three (3) calendar months starting from 1st January every year,
and is payable on or before 20th of the month following the end of the tax period.
Returns are to be filled every quarter. A person may elect to be exempt from
provisions of Sec 12 C which means that the taxpayer has an option to either
register under TOT or continue to follow the current system.
TOT payers must deregister if annual turnover exceeds Kshs.5, 000, 000 or if a
companys profits run down below Kshs.500, 000, they can write to the
Commissioner General upon the scrutiny of their books of account to be
removed from remitting the TOT.
Business owners who subscribe to pay the turnover tax will qualify for
exemption from the income tax brackets and be eligible for VAT cuts. The
business owners will be required to keep proper records of their business
transactions so as to show that they fall in the tax bracket. These include
cashbooks, sales/purchases receipts and invoices, ETR receipts where available
and bank statements. According to the regulations, turnover tax returns shall be
submitted quarterly using pay-in-slip.
About 75% of the non-designated firms either file nil tax returns or do not file
tax returns at all. The large proportion of micro and small non-designated
businesses that are registered for VAT increases tax administration costs yet
their contribution to the total revenue is very low. According to the current
international practice, micro and small enterprises are accorded special tax
treatment in the bid to enhance tax compliance. This is attributed to their
inability to maintain books of accounts for their transaction and complexities that
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
19/76
are inherent in the regular tax regimes. A special tax regime that is based on
turnover is usually designed for such firms.
In Kenya, most of the micro and small traders either keep incomplete business
records or do not keep any record at all. This is attributed to low levels of
education attained by majority of the traders. To enhance their tax compliance,
there is need to isolate the micro and small traders from the current tax regime in
accordance with international best practice.
In view of the prevailing scenario, it was decided that the VAT threshold be
raised from the previous threshold of Kshs.3m to Kshs.5m such that 85% of the
non-designated business whose turnover fall below Kshs.5m of the new
threshold be subjected to turnover-based tax regime at 3% of the gross sales
turnover per annum without considering any overhead expenses. The objective
of introducing turnover tax in Kenya was geared towards bringing the informal
sector into the net and to simplify processes for the small and micro-enterprises
by:
i. Simplifying tax procedures
ii. Simplifying tax computations
iii. Simplifying record keeping
The expected outcomes is to make return filing easier and reduce their cost of
compliance since record keeping will be minimized and costs of hiring tax
agents eliminated.
1.2 Statement of the problem
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
20/76
The Government was finding it hard to meet its services with the revenue being
collected. Many projects could not be completed because the Treasury had no
additional funds to give. Each ministry was scrambling for the little that was
there with the Treasury. In view of the problem, the Government found it wise to
widen the tax base by introducing turnover tax (TOT) to get more revenue to run
the services. The tax system has been very effective because of high penalties,
ease of collection methods and the use of technology.
This paper therefore aims to analyze the impacts of turnover tax collection
methods on improved tax compliance.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.3.1 General Objective
To analyze the impacts turnover tax collection methods on improved tax
compliance.
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
1. To investigate how high penalties on tax default influences turnover tax
good performance.
2. To establish that the simplicity of the collection methods used influence
turnover tax good performance.
3. To examine how the use of information technology in tax collection
influence turnover tax good performance.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
21/76
1.4 Research Questions
1. Does high penalties imposed on tax default influence turnover tax good
performance?
2. Does the simplicity of the collection methods used influence turnover tax
good performance?
3. Does the use of information technology in tax collection influence
turnover tax good performance?
1.5 Justification
Against the background stated in the problem statement, Kenya introduced TOT
regime through the Finance Act 2007 and became effective from 1 st January,
2008. The empirical results of this study are expected to inform about the
usefulness challenges and limits of TOT in Kenya. The study will prove
important to a number of stakeholders:-
i. Tax authority-This study will identify some tax administrative factors
that need attention of the tax authorities and officers for correction as
literature on countries that have implemented simplified tax regimes for
small and medium enterprises indicate that they have experienced
problems with tax avoidance and fraud schemes used by large
businesses.
ii. Tax payers-Tax payers would wish to have a tax system that is certain,
convenient, simple, fair and economical. This study will reveal whether
this is being achieved in the administration of TOT in Kenya.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
22/76
iii. Consultants-This study will be bring out a deeper understanding of TOT
administration and highlight the key problems faced by the tax payers
and KRA. The study will therefore help tax consultants to solve tax
payers problems and come up with better tax policies.
iv. Academicians-The study will offer an extension of knowledge of the tax
system in Kenya and reach conclusions that will be valuable in
understanding the key factors considered or to be considered by policy
makers in their endeavor to achieve sustainable economic growth and
development. It will also provide a basis for further research.
1.6 Scope
The scope of this study was limited to micro, small and medium enterprises
(MSMEs) in Embu County (Embu East and Embu West Districts). The
researcher focused in all businesses that are within the Kshs.500, 000 and
Kshs.5, 000, 000 ranges (turnover tax bracket). The research was carried out
from June 2011 to October 2011.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
The study was conducted in small and medium enterprises in Embu County and
the following were the limitations:
i. Uncooperative respondents-some respondents were unwilling to fill the
questionnaires while others left some questions blank. Others failed to
hand in back the questionnaires to the researcher.
ii. Confidentiality-some respondents feared to give some confidential and
useful information of their institutions.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
23/76
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
There are many ways to tax individuals and corporations. Taxes may be levied
on consumption (such as the VAT, sales or excise taxes), flows of income (such
as enterprise and individual income taxes), or wealth and assets (such as property
taxes, assets taxes and some income taxes). In fact, the tax systems of most
countries are a combination of these different types of taxation. Developed tax
systems tend to tax income according to relatively complex structures which
utilize sophisticated accounting, record keeping, and tax administration in order
to balance various goals of the tax system including equity and efficiency.
Consumption taxation in more developed systems consists of excise taxes, value-
added taxes and sales taxes, with varying degrees of complexity. In all countries,
some enterprises and individuals remain outside of the tax system through the
use of different types of evasion or avoidance mechanisms.
In many cases, it is easier for individual taxpayers and small enterprises (versus
large corporations) to remain outside of the tax net for the simple reason that
they can remain inconspicuous to the tax administration. For these types of
entities, complicated and administratively burdensome tax systems further
discourage compliance with the tax laws. Tax administrations are often left with
the choice of going after large firms where the potential tax revenue pay-back
is higher or going after less lucrative small taxpayers/ additionally, complicated
tax systems make it difficult and expensive for start-up firms (particularly small
enterprises) to act in good faith in terms of tax compliance due to the costs
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
24/76
associated with record keeping and the need for specialized information to
comply with complex tax laws.
At the same time, large and small taxpayers find it beneficial to take advantage
of loopholes in the tax system in order to minimize their tax payments. These
factors, tax avoidance, tax evasion, and the expense and difficulty for start-up
enterprises to comply with complex tax laws, have led many countries to adopt
specific tax regimes to counter these problems. In many countries, imputed or
presumptive taxation has traditionally been used as a way to get some tax
revenue from these taxpayers who might otherwise go completely untaxed.
These systems calculate the tax base via easy-to-obtain indicators or other
methods, instead of relying on taxpayer self-assessment. This method of taxation
can accomplish tow things; it can reduce the cost of compliance by the taxpayer
as the tax base is easier to calculate than that of the income or corporate tax, and,
once the system is determined, it reduces the cost of tax administration. Once
part of the simplified system, it theoretically becomes more difficult to
disappear from the view of the tax administrators by going to the shadow or
underground economy.
Imputed/presumptive taxation is therefore often regarded as a stepping-stone to
the regular tax system, such that a taxpayer would be subject to this simplified
regime for a limited period of time and then become part of the regular tax
system. It is against this background that turnover tax which is a type of
presumptive tax was introduced in Kenya.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
25/76
2.2 Theoretical Review
2.2.1 Technology
Technology is the making, usage, and knowledge oftools, machines,
techniques, crafts, systems or methods of organization in order to solve a
problem or perform a specific function. It can also refer to the collection of such
tools and machinery. Technology has influenced the way we work, play, and
interact with others. It is not surprising that technology has also affected how tax
systems are designed and administered in developing countries. These changes
have not always been for the better. In a pioneering study of tax administration
in developing countries, Radian (1980) noted that the three decades since World
War II had seen a number of cycles of ineffective reform, including
computerization. Many countries shared the experiences of Trinidad, in which
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue said that "since 1969 we have not
produced any meaningful statistical data. In that year, we transferred our returns,
processing and accounting work onto a computer Radian (1980, 217).
Technological change continues. Most countries have now moved from rooms
full of clerks posting entries by hand in large ledger books-or, as we observed in
one country as late as the early 1990s, writing in pencil on little pieces of paper-
to widespread use of computers to administer their tax systems. The transition
from hand to mouse has been incomplete and uneven. Major differences exist
among and within developing countries, both with respect to how their tax
systems are designed and administered, and, more generally, with respect to how
technological advances have changed the manner in which their economies
operate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crafthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemhttp://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/radianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crafthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemhttp://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/radian -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
26/76
Roller and Waverman (2001) demonstrate that the introduction of mobile
telephones has enabled developing countries to bypass the heavy infrastructure
development of land-based telephone systems, and has facilitated market
integration and more rapid economic development. Does the use of technology
in the tax systems of developing countries mark a similar opportunity for
developing countries to improve tax administration and design? Ideally, to
answer this question one needs to consider the costs and benefits of different
types of technological changes for administrators, taxpayers, and third parties
involved in the taxing process in countries at different levels of development.
We cannot undertake this major task here; instead, we present an overview and
selective survey of many of the issues raised by how technology influences tax
administration and design. Technology is definitely not a "magic bullet" to solve
the manifold problems of development taxation. It may, however, provide part of
the answer for many countries.
Experience in Kenya and elsewhere demonstrates that the successful
introduction of new technologies requires consideration of the susceptibilities of
existing staff and their resistance to change Peterson (1996). Indeed all those in a
position to affect how well any new IT system can function must work together.
As a complex system is more likely to engender resistance and problems, the
design, structure, and operations of the system should be as simple as possible.
In some situations it may even be advantageous to entrust part of the
responsibility for setting up an information system to organizations outside the
tax administration, or even outside the government.
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/magic+bullethttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/magic+bullet -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
27/76
The availability, cost, and accessibility of computers make them ideal for the
large--scale information-processing and coordination problems facing tax
administrations in even the poorest countries. Among the areas that may be
computerized are: (1) taxpayer records and tax collection (taxpayer compliance);
(2) internal management and control over resources; (3) legal structure and
procedures; and (4) systems to lower taxpayer compliance costs.
i. Tracking Taxpayers
Almost all tax systems use a taxpayer identification number (TIN) to track
taxpayers. In every country that has successfully adopted improved technology
for tax administration, allotting a unique identification number has been a
necessary requirement. Without such a number, information can neither be
stored properly nor used effectively. Countries may use a number unique to the
tax system or one linked to other government activities. Several countries have
begun issuing "smart" ID cards to citizens that contain TINs as well as other
information.
Improvements in technology allow governments to coordinate the numbers
assigned with respect to various government services and financial services to
TINs issued by taxing authorities. The coordination will make it more difficult
for those without TINs to access government services to obtain passports or
driver's licenses, register cars, transfer and register property, or use public
schools or hospitals. TINs could also be required to open bank accounts,
purchase airline tickets over certain dollar amount, or gain access to electrical,
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Financial+serviceshttp://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Financial+services -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
28/76
gas or water services--thus increasing the costs of operating outside the tax
system.
ii. Information Reporting and Withholding
An important task of tax administration is to bring together information from
different sources, both within the administration and from other relevant
government and private sources, in order to verify the information supplied by
taxpayers themselves. Tax laws in most countries already require various private
and public agencies to furnish information regarding various transactions and
activities to the tax authorities. In some but not all cases, those agencies are also
supposed to withhold a part of the payment made by the agent to the potential
taxpayer. Withholding, thus, serves the two-fold purpose of helping to identify
potential taxpayers and ensuring that at least a part of the tax is realized at
source, thereby minimizing risk as well as delay in payment. Neither internal nor
external sources of information are of any use in the absence of an efficient
system of monitoring, or of adequate IT infrastructure to collateand store data
with easy access for retrieval and cross-checking. A reliable single, centrally
maintained register of taxpayers, each with a unique TIN, is, therefore, essential.
Withholding in developing countries could cover not only traditional items, such
as wages, interest, and dividends, but also professional fees, payments to
independent contractors, rents, and (in some instances) a wide range of business
transactions. Some countries have even introduced what may be called "reverse
withholding" in which purchasers (government agencies or large enterprises)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/collatehttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/collatehttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/collate -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
29/76
withhold tax from sellers (small enterprises). Such widespread withholding is not
a panacea Soos (1990). It makes its own information demands as the tax
administration must be able to control withholders to make sure they hand over
to the Treasury the amounts withheld, and it must also be able to check whether
amounts that taxpayers credit against their liabilities have in fact been withheld.
But it can still be very useful, particularly with respect to imposing some taxes
on the informal activities.
From an administrative perspective, most taxes collected in developing countries
come from a relatively small number of tax collecting agents. Accurate tracking
of fiscal flows through such large entities, which probably account for 80 percent
or more of current collections in many countries, is critical to successful tax
administration. Before devoting much effort to this difficult task, however, it is
critical to ensure that tight control is maintained over the payments and liabilities
of large taxpayers. One way to do so, commonly recommended by experts, is to
set up a "large taxpayer unit" (LTU) to monitor closely the non-filing, stop-
filing, and compliance behavior of such taxpayers Baer, Benon, and Toro (2002).
In some developing countries, experience in computerizing the information
flowing through and to such LTUs has proven to be a useful testing ground for
developing systems that can be later extended to the whole taxpaying population.
iii. Processing Returns and Payments
One of the first uses of IT was to process tax returns and payments. Partly
because banks had more adequate data processing systems than tax
administrations, several Latin American countries initially outsourced the receipt
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/LTUhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/testing+groundhttp://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/LTUhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/testing+ground -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
30/76
and processing of tax returns and payments to the banking systems. More
recently, even countries like Panama and Paraguay have adopted electronic
filing, which has facilitated return processing. Since 2001, Chile, likely the most
advanced tax administration inLatin America, has supplied most wage-earners
and pensioners with "pre-populated returns" that contain taxpayer identifying
information, details on gross income received from various sources, tax
withheld, information on certain deduction items, a calculation of the tax
assessed, any credits, and the tax payable or refundable (OECD, 2006).
iv. Auditing Tax Payers
Auditing is a necessary element of good tax administration. If information
matching or cross-checking fails to identify underpayment of tax, then auditing
is the only way to uncover intentional noncompliance. Typically, auditing means
the examination of filed returns by tax authorities to determine the correctness of
self-assessed taxes. The authorities may also use audits as the basis for statistical
studies of taxpayer characteristics to be used in developingpresumptive
indicators--a prominent feature of taxation in many developing countries Bird
and Wallace (2004). The success of auditing and the feasibility of various
auditing strategies depend on the quality of the information available to the
auditor, which in turn depends on three factors: the information gathered from
the taxpayer and third parties, the information processing
capacity of auditors, and the strategy pursued. As more advanced IT systems
improve the first two factors, the authorities have a greater range of auditing
strategies.
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Latin+Americahttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Latin+Americahttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/OECDhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Presumptivehttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Presumptivehttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Information+processinghttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Latin+Americahttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/OECDhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Presumptivehttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Information+processing -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
31/76
Technological advances will alter the economic environment in which
governments seek to collect tax revenue. These advances will make some
persons or transactions easier to tax. Particularly in developing countries, use of
various methods of electronic payments will move more transactions from the
informal to the formal economy. As discussed earlier, technology will also
provide tax administrators with more tools to track the movements of goods and
individuals. It should also increase opportunities and reduce costs of cooperating
with tax administrators in other countries to improve tax compliance of persons
with investments and activities outside the country. But technology will also
make some persons or transactions harder to tax.
For example, it is currently much harder for tax authorities to track goods in
digitized form than those that are physically transported across or between
countries. Foreign lawyers, accountants, and management consultants can
provide services with little or no physical presence in a country. Advances in the
financial service industry allow domestic investors access to foreign banks and
securities with simple internet access. The globalization of financial markets has
made it harder for any one country to tax income from mobile capital.
Technology may also influence incentives of governmental officials in the
design and administration of tax systems. Hettich and Winer (1999) set out a
model in which changes in administrative costs may affect both the size of the
public sector and the choice of tax structure. Costs may change because of
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Internet+accesshttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Internet+accesshttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Globalizationhttp://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/administrative+costshttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Internet+accesshttp://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Globalizationhttp://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/administrative+costs -
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
32/76
changes in administrative technology like those we have just discussed or they
may change because technology has changed the nature of the economy.
Electronic Tax Register
A lot of debate has been going on in the country between business owners and
the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) on the adoption of Electronic Tax
Registers. Electronic Tax Registers were introduced by KRA to replace the
manual paper system of remitting VAT returns that was considered inefficient
and straining. To enhance the accountability systems for Value Added Tax, the
Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has spearheaded the introduction of the
Electronic Tax Registers and Electronic Signature Devices. These devices offer
unique benefits to traders and the Revenue Authority alike by recording
transaction data in such a manner that it cannot be deleted. The Government of
Kenya on the other hand allowed businesses to offset the cost of the ETR
installation against the input VAT as well as training of traders on the use and
benefits of those devices, Lumumba Omweri Martin (2010).
Electronic Cash Register is a device used by traders to record sales and issue
receipts. It also stores information such as sales, stocks, and can also issue
reports e.g. daily sales. Electronic Tax Register (ETR) is a Cash Register but
with Fiscal Memory. Fiscal Memory is a special Read Only Memory built into
the cash register to store tax information at the time of sale. ETR can be used as
stand alone or configured into a network. ETR has special security features e.g.
seal, memory, serial no., special technical specifications etc.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
33/76
Taxpayers using electronic tax register or tax printer shall: [Public Notice 49
(2004)]
i. Perform the registration of each sales occurrence with the use of the
electronic tax register or tax printer and perform a printout of a fiscal
receipt from each occurrence of sales and to deliver the original of the
receipt to the purchaser.
ii. Prepare the daily report at the end of sales for a given day, not later than
before the performance of the first sales on the following day, prepare the
monthly fiscal report after finishing the sales on the last day of the
month, and prepare the annual report as indicated in Public Notice No.
48
iii. Register the sales with the use of the substitute tax register.
iv. Verify the correctness of the electronic tax register or tax printer
operations, taking particular care with reference to the correct
programming of the names of goods and services and their appropriate
allocation to tax rates and to prompt reporting of each malfunctioning in
the electronic tax register operations.
v. Upon each request of the control authorities, make the electronic tax
register available for the control with respect to its being intact and the
correctness of its operations.
vi. Perform every six month the obligatory technical inspection of the
electronic tax register by an appropriate service point.
vii. Perform the printout of all documents issued by the electronic tax register
and their copies.
viii. Store the copies of tax register reports within five years.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
34/76
ix. Use the electronic tax registers only to record their own sales, without the
right for their use by any third parties.
x. Report the cash register at the appropriate tax office within 7 days from
the date of its fiscalisation to obtain the tax register record number.
xi. Permanently affix the electronic tax register record identification
number, on its casing.
xii. Record entries in the fiscal cash register.s ledger performed by the
taxpayer.
xiii. Store the tax register ledger in the place and within the period of its use
and make it available upon the request of appropriate authorities and the
service staff.
xiv. Present the loss of cash registers for technical inspection before their
repeated usage by the taxpayer for the maintenance of the records.
2.2.2 Simplicity of collection methods
Simplicity is an important attribute for a tax system and there have been many
attempts at simplification in different countries. However these attempts have
not been very successful. The main reason is that there are, of course, important
factors that cause tax systems to be complex and not all of them are bad. Another
important matter is that it is not always clear what is meant by tax simplification.
A further difficulty has been that attempts at simplification have often been made
on an ad hoc basis and, once the enthusiasm has exhausted itself, the trend
towards greater complexity continues.
The goals of most tax reforms have been to raise more revenue for government,
achieve various economic and social goals, and improve the efficiency of the tax
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
35/76
collection process. However, tax reforms in general have paid little attention to
improving the tax system to make it easy for businesses and entrepreneurs to
comply. This is especially true in developing countries. The cost of compliance
with the tax system for business is not trivial; it constitutes a significant fraction
of the actual tax owed. Some of these costs are indirect in nature and as a result
tend to be underestimated. However, investment climate assessments (ICA) and
tax cost of compliance surveys of the World Bank have revealed the magnitude
of these costs.
In the World Banks ICA surveys, tax rates were identified as a major constraint
by 37 percent of businesses overall; 27 percent specifically identified the tax
administration as a major constraint. Figure 2.1 shows that tax rates and
administration are two of the top six constraints identified by businesses in
nations outside the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD). Cost-of-compliance and doing business surveys collect information on
the time that businesses spend and the costs they incur to comply with their tax
liabilities. According to the Doing Business 2010 report, businesses spend an
average of 275 hours on 30 different tax payments per year. These numbers are
corroborated by Foreign Investment Advisory Service (FIAS) cost-of-
compliance surveys, which have found that a typical medium-size business in
the Ukraine spends about 2,400 hours per year complying with tax liabilities;
essentially, this implies hiring a fulltime accountant dedicated entirely to tax
work. The time that businesses spend complying with taxes would be better
spent performing the primary task of conducting the business.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
36/76
Figure 2.1: Data from investment climate surveys
Tax simplification improves compliance and reduces the cost of tax collection.
Simplifying a tax system also involves streamlining its administration, reducing
redundancies and points of contact, and improving the efficiency of existing
procedures. Improved procedures and processes (such as the use of automation
and risk-based audits, reduced discretion, and so on) also reduce the costs of
administering the tax system. Improved compliance-resulting from an improved
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
37/76
investment climate and more accessible tax system-also contributes to lowering
the cost of collection.
A strategy to simplify the tax system requires several inputs. Each tool provides
the policy maker or advisor with the necessary inputs to simplify the tax system:
i. Using tax-compliance cost surveys to understand the time and cost of
paying taxes and the instruments responsible for this burden.
ii. A tax inventory, including a sub-national tax inventory, of the several
licenses, fees, and taxes that businesses have to pay.
iii. Process maps that illustrate various administrative procedures, with
special emphasis on those that generate points of contact with taxpayers
Tax simplification is not simple. Albert Einstein said, Everything should be
made as simple as possiblebut not simpler. Everyone, everywhere, agrees
that tax systems should be simplified, yet each year tax codes grow longer and
more convoluted. The problem is far from new. In 1377, the great medieval Arab
polymath Ibn Khaldun wrote: At the beginning of the dynasty, taxation yields
large revenue from small assessments. At the end of the dynasty, taxation yields
small revenue from large assessments Muqaddimah (1958).
Simplification is not an end in itself, but a means toward greater transparency,
predictability, and fairness in the tax system. It is futile to believe that
simplifying taxes will simplify the complexities of the nation itself. Complexity
is the inevitable result of the fact that the politically optimal tax structure
requires marginal political opposition per dollar of tax revenue to be equalized
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
38/76
across taxable activities for each taxpayer, as well as to be equalized across
taxpayers for each activity Hettich and Winer (1988:705).
Major reviews of the tax system have been carried out in recent years, all of
which have considered ways of tax simplification leading to a reduced tax
compliance costs therefore improved compliance. Each of these reviews has
recommended tax simplification in a number of areas, especially tax payment
methods and the imposition of penalties and interest. The objective of tax reform
should be simplifying the tax system. Reasonable simplification can more
adequately eliminate the necessity of engaging tax consultants, and other
associated costs, thereby combating tax evasion and avoidance.
2.2.3 Tax Penalty
The penalty is a sum of money determined by law (legal penalty) or under
contract (contract penalty) which the responsible party is obligated to pay if the
obligation is not carried out or is carried out improperly. A penalty is paid for
violation of contract conditions regarding time, quality, and method of
performance; it is recovered regardless of whether losses actually occur or how
large such losses are.
Depending on the combination of losses and penalties recovered, the following
types of penalties are distinguished: an offset penalty, discharged with the
recovery of losses; an exclusive penalty, the collection of which excludes
recovery of losses; a contract penalty, collected together with losses; and an
alternative penalty, by which the aggrieved party has the right to demand
recovery of either the penalty or actual losses.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
39/76
The penalty is used to strengthen plan and contract discipline. The collection of
penalties by socialist organizations is therefore viewed by the law not only as a
right but also as a duty to the state. Payment of a penalty does not release the
responsible party from performance of the obligation itself, with the exception of
cases where the plan on which an obligation between socialist organizations was
based is no longer in force.
According to the Income Tax Act, Cap 107, A person guilty of an offence
under this Act for which no other penalty is specifically provided shall be
liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand shillings or to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both. Cap 109 (1)
of the same Act, a person shall be guilty of an offence if he, without reasonable
excuse
(a) Fails to furnish a return or give a certificate as required by section
35(5); or
(b) Fails to furnish a full and true return in accordance with
the requirements of a notice served on him under this Act or fails
to give notice to the Commissioner as required by section 52(3);
or
(c) fails to furnish within the required time to the Commissioner
or to any other person any document which under this Act, or
under a notice served on him under this Act, he is
required so to furnish; or
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
40/76
(d) Fails to keep records, books or accounts in accordance with the
requirements of a notice served on him under section 55(1), or
fails to keep those records, books or accounts in the
language specified in the notice; or
(e) Fails to preserve a record, document or book of account in
contravention of Section 55 (2); or
(f) Fails to produce a document for the examination of the
Commissioner in accordance with the requirements of a notice
served on him under this Act; or
(g) Destroys, damages or defaces any accounts or other documents in
contravention of a notice served on him under section 56(1); or
(h) Fails to attend at a time and place in accordance with the
requirements of a notice served on him under this Act; or
(i) Fails to answer any question lawfully put to him, or to supply any
information lawfully required from him, under this Act; or
(j) Fails to deduct and account, or fails to account for tax, as
provided by section 37, or fails to supply prescribed certificates
as is required by that section; or
(k) When requested by the Commissioner, fails to furnish the
identifying number required under section 132, or fails to
include in any return, in a statement or in other documents
the identifying number when required to do so.
Tax Evasion
Imposition of penalties usually arises out tax evasion. Tax evasion is said to
occur when individuals deliberately fail to comply with their tax obligations. The
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
41/76
resulting tax revenue loss may cause serious damage to the proper functioning of
the public sector, threatening its capacity to finance its basic expenses. Although
tax compliance is a major concern for all governments and analytical
investigation of tax evasion can be traced as far back as the work, one of the
pioneers of law and economics, Cesare Beccaria (1764), the problem was long
segregated from the main body of economics and left essentially to the attention
of tax authorities and jurisprudence. The modern use of economic tools for the
analysis of tax compliance can be credited to Allingham and Sandmo ([1972]
1991), who extended the influential work of Becker (1968) on law enforcement
to taxation using modern risk theory.
By distancing effective payments from statutory taxes, tax evasion defines a
specific revenue deficiency, known as the tax gap. Let us emphasize from the
outset that the tax gap is not equal to the amount of additional revenue that
would be collected by stricter enforcement, for perfect enforcement would
significantly affect the economic scenario (some firms would go bankrupt,
taxpayers would modify their labor supply, prices and incomes would change,
and so on), so the tax base would surely be altered. As a result, at least in theory,
net revenue could even turn out to be smaller. Thus standard measures of tax
gaps must be interpreted cautiously. They are only roughly suggestive of the
likely immediate effects of marginal improvements in enforcement. Also, one
should be wary of the clich that statutory taxes represent the ideal world and tax
gaps an intrinsic evil.
In economic terms, evasion problems originate in the fact that the variables that
define the tax base (incomes, sales, revenues, wealth, and so on) are often not
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
42/76
observable. That is, an external observer cannot usually see the actual
magnitude of an individuals tax base, and hence cannot know his true tax
liability. Sometimes this knowledge can be obtained by means of costly audits,
in which case we say that the tax base is verifiable (at a cost). In other cases, as
when it is related to cash payments, the tax base cannot be verified at all.
Taxpayers can take advantage of the imperfect information about their liability
and elude taxation.
A related concept is tax avoidance (or reduction), by which individuals reduce
their own tax in a way that may be unintended by tax legislators but is
permissible by law. Avoidance is typically accomplished by structuring
transactions so as to minimize tax liability. In some cases, avoidance is
encouraged by legislation granting favorable tax treatment to specific activities
in contrast to general taxation principles. From a legal standpoint, evasion differs
from avoidance in being unlawful, and hence punishable (at least in theory). As
far as economic function is concerned, however, evasion and avoidance
obviously have very strong similarities; sometimes, indeed, they can hardly be
distinguished (see for instance Feldman and Kay, 1981; Cowell, 1990;
McBarnet, 1992). This adds to the difficulty of interpreting the real implications
of the tax gap.
Theories of Taxation
The economists have put forward many theories or principles of taxation at
different times to guide the state as to how justice or equity in taxation can be
achieved. The main theories or principles in brief, are:
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
43/76
i. Benefit Theory
According to this theory, the state should levy taxes on individuals according to
the benefit conferred on them. The more benefits a person derives from the
activities of the state, the more he should pay to the government.
ii. Cost of Service Theory
Some economists were of the opinion that if the state charges actual cost of the
service rendered from the people, it will satisfy the idea of equity or justice in
taxation. The cost of service principle can no doubt be applied to some extent in
those cases where the services are rendered out of prices and are a bit easy to
determine, e.g., postal, railway services, supply of electricity, etc., etc. But most
of the expenditure incurred by the state cannot be fixed for each individual
because it cannot be exactly determined. For instance, how can we measure the
cost of service of the police, armed forces, judiciary, etc., to different
individuals?
iii. Ability to Pay Theory
The most popular and commonly accepted principle of equity or justice in
taxation is that citizens of a country should pay taxes to the government in
accordance with their ability to pay. It appears very reasonable and just that taxes
should be levied on the basis of the taxable capacity of an individual. For
instance, if the taxable capacity of a person A is greater than the person B, the
former should be asked to pay more taxes than the latter.
2.3 Critique of the existing literature relevant to the study
Several theories have been advanced in this research, but are subject to criticism.
i. Benefit Theory
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
44/76
This principle has been subjected to severe criticism on the following grounds:
Firstly, if the state maintains a certain connection between the benefits conferred
and the benefits derived. It will be against the basic principle of the tax. A tax, as
we know, is compulsory contribution made to the public authorities to meet the
expenses of the government and the provisions of general benefit. There is no
direct quidpro quo in the case of a tax. Secondly, most of the expenditure
incurred by the slate is for the general benefit of its citizens, It is not possible to
estimate the benefit enjoyed by a particular individual every year. Thirdly, if we
apply this principle in practice, then the poor will have to pay the heaviest taxes,
because they benefit more from the services of the state.
ii. Cost of Service Theory
Dalton has rejected this theory on the ground that theres no quid pro qua in a
tax.
Tax Reforms in Kenya
From independence in 1963 until the early 1980s, public spending in Kenya was
financed through a somewhat uncoordinated set of taxes and fees inherited from
British rule and supplemented by foreign aid inflows. The oil shock in the early
1970s led to the countrys first significant fiscal crisis, in response to which
some relatively minor tax reforms were undertaken. Sales taxes were introduced
as a means of generating extra revenue, and trade taxes were used in an attempt
to reduce the ballooning balance of payments deficit. One motivation for the
relatively heavy reliance on good-specific sales and excise taxes was the belief
that the government could get the prices right, especially through its use of
trade taxes in the pursuit of first, import-substitution policies and then export-led
growth strategies.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
45/76
The use of:
Technology
High penalities
Simplified tax
methods
Reduced costs
Filing is made
easy
Increased
compliance
The primary aim of Tax Modernization Program (TMP) was to raise the
revenue-to-GDP ratio from 22% in 1986 to 24% by the mid-1990s, although this
target was increased to 28% in 1992 (Muriithi and Moyi 2003).
2.4 Summary & Gaps
From the foregoing literature, it can be seen that turnover tax has come a long
way, especially in the ease of collection methods. From the adoption of
technology, TOT collection has been made easier as the customers are able to
file in their returns with ease with the introduction of the electronic tax registers.
With installation of high penalties on tax default, customers have been obligated
to file in their turnover returns to avoid coming into contact with the stringent
consequences of tax default.
Many researchers have documented on turnover tax. However, there is a
research gap on how to make collection of turnover tax more simple and easier,
and also to come up with ways of preventing tax evasion.
2.5 Conceptual Framework
The following is the conceptual framework for analyzing the usefulness, limits
and pitfalls of turnover tax in Kenya.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
46/76
Fig. 2.2 Conceptual Framework
Prior to the introduction of TOT, value added tax which had replaced sales tax
was operational. Sales tax was operational in Kenya since 1963 until 1990 when
Vat was introduced. Sales tax is a consumption tax charged at the point of
purchase for certain goods and services. The tax is usually set as a percentage by
government charging the tax. The tax can be included in the price (tax inclusive)
or added at the point of sale (tax exclusive). Most taxes are collected by the
seller, who pays the tax over to the government. The tax burden often falls on the
purchaser but at times falls on the seller.
Sales tax is imposed on the gross value of goods sold at one particular stage of a
business activity e.g. it may be levied either at wholesale stage or retail trade
stage. When goods are manufactured and then various processes are completed
before the goods are sold to the final consumer, sales tax is imposed only at one
particular stage of the production process. Sales tax often exclude items or
provides rebates in an effort to create progressive effects necessary items such as
non-prepared food, clothing or prescription drugs are exempt from sales tax to
alleviate the burden on the poor. Sales tax is dependent on proper record
keeping. In Kenya during tax reforms in 1990, sales tax was scrapped and
replaced with VAT.
VAT was introduced in Kenya in 1990 to replace sales tax. This shift was
motivated by the argument that Vat (relative to sales tax) had higher revenue
potential and that its collection and administration were more economic, efficient
and expedient. Since 1991, a number of steps have been taken to rationalize and
strengthen the Vat, most importantly by moving several items subject to VAT
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
47/76
from specific to ad valorem rates and broadening VAT coverage in the service
sector. Generally, four measures were applied to broaden the base of VAT.
First, retail-level sales tax was changed to manufacture-level VAT. Second, the
tax point was gradually moved from the manufacturer to the retail level in a
number of sectors including jewellery, household appliances and entertainment
equipment, furniture, construction materials, vehicle parts, and pre-recorded
music. As a result, the coverage of VAT on good supplied at retail level
expanded tremendously from 1990 to 1995.
Third, goods were defined to exclude the supply of immovable tangible and all
intangible property and rental or immovable property. Fourth, the coverage of
service sector was expanded to include business services; hotel and restaurant
services, entertainment, conferences, advertising, telecommunications,
construction, transport, the rental, repair and maintenance of all equipment
(including vehicles) and a range of personal services.
Measures aimed at VAT rationalization included the reduction of the maximum
rate from over 150% to 15% (between 1990 and 1997) and the reduction bands
from 15 to 3. Additional measures including raising the minimum turnover level
for compulsory registration from Kshs.10, 000 to Kshs.40, 000 and introducing
stiff penalties for defaulters in the following areas: late VAT returns, failure to
issue VAT invoices and failure to maintain proper books of account.
Another aspect of VAT that elicited interest from the taxpayers was the tax
refund system. At the time of inception, the refund system was characterized by
weak controls and corruption that led to loss of revenue Nyamunga (2001).
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
48/76
Administrative changes were undertaken thereafter (mid 1990s) to streamline the
refund system.
Since VAT relies heavily on proper recording, the willingness of traders to avail
their accounts to the scrutiny of the tax authorities is crucial. As such,
transparency in the running of the business concerns is inevitable. A limitation of
VAT relative to the sales tax is that the compliance process is longer. Such a tax
is more open to graft since each stage of verification, approval and validation,
avails an opportunity to extort bribes. Sequencing is therefore a symptomatic
problem with VAT. Similarly, corruption erodes its efficacy.
In 2004/05 the government proposed to increase the VAT threshold from
Kshs.3m to Kshs.5m. The total number of taxpayers envisaged to have been in
that bracket was approximately 66, 000. Out of this number, 52, 000 fell below
the turnover of Kshs.5m. The Government of Kenya thought otherwise, that it
was prudent to bring them into the tax bracket under the presumptive tax during
the Finance Bill 2007 and the tax was named turnover tax.
TOT is a subset of presumptive tax which is meant to target the hard to tax. It
is rooted under the practices of tax administration and has much to do with
groups of legible tax payers whose tax amount are quite low compared with
administrative cost that would have been incurred by the tax administration to
assess the proper amount of tax.
The following challenges are anticipated in its implementation:-
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
49/76
i. Identifying and registering small tax payers
ii. Addressing the equity principal of taxation in the TOT regimes is an
issue. There are difficulties in ensuring that both vertical and horizontal
equity is achieved in the regime.
iii. Transition from the TOT to the regular regime. Some of micro, small and
medium enterprises (MSMEs) may tend to stagnate in the presumptive
regime instead of graduating to the regular regime, especially where tax
liability is expected to increase with graduation.
iv. Low voluntary tax compliance. There is a challenge in voluntary
compliance and filing of returns is expected to be poor. This will make it
difficult to achieve the overall objective of the regime in enhancing tax
compliance of the sector at minimal costs.
v. Risk of not keeping proper records or manipulating if the records kept.
It is upon this basis that this research is examining whether the introduction of
TOT has some impact on improved tax compliance.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
50/76
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
The methodology seeks to put the research question into prospective and also to
establish whether the tax simplification leads to improved tax compliance. It
presents the route map of arriving at certain generalization, justification and
recommendation. This epistemology of finding the relationship will guide the
collection of data and analysis of that data in this project.
3.1 Research Design
The searcher used descriptive research which analyzed the impacts of turnover
collection methods in improved tax compliance with a subject population and in
this case the population was MSMEs in Embu County. The research design was
chosen because it seeks to identify the components leading to the problem, future
consequences and possible solutions to the problem.
3.2 Target Population
The target population of this study will be the MSMEs in Embu County. The
population is estimated to be 200 businesses within the location of the study. The
population was chosen due to limitation of resources and its near accessibility by
the researcher.
3.3 Sampling Frame
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
51/76
The researcher sampled 40 businesses and would be representative of the entire
population. The sample was appropriate because of the proximity to the
researcher.
3.4 Sample and Sampling Technique
Simple random sampling procedure will be used to identify the sample size to be
interviewed and administer questionnaire.
3.5 Instruments
The instrument to be used by the researcher is questionnaires.
3.6 Data Collection Procedure
The study will use participatory method, using the instruments mentioned above
in item 3.4. Benefits of using this method are that responses are gathered in a
standard way, so questionnaires are more objective, potential information can be
collected from a large portion of a group.
3.7 Data Processing and Analysis
The data collected will be coded, edited and presented in tables and graphs. Data
will be analysed in simple statistical methods. This will help the researcher to
analyze and compare the findings from the taxpayers (businesses).
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
52/76
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the results of data collected by use of questionnaires, and
analyzes and interprets the findings.
4.2 Response Rate
This study was carried out between 14th and 18th November, 2011 during which a
total of 40 questionnaires were administered to a sample of 40 MSMEs. At the
end of the study period, 32 questionnaires had been received which represented a
response rate of 80%. The response rate was sufficient for analysis and statistical
confidence for generalization of the study findings.
4.3 Registration of Business
Respondents were asked whether their businesses were registered with the
Registrar of Business and all the 32 respondents gave a Yes response, giving
100% response rate. This is represented in table 4.1 below, analyzed by
frequency and percentages of total response.
Table 4.1: Registration of Business
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
YES 32 100%
NO 0 0%
TOTAL 32 100%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
53/76
4.4 Quantitative Data Analysis
4.4.1 Age of Enterprise
Respondents were asked to indicate when they started their businesses. 50% of
the businesses were started 10 years ago, 25% was started 7-9 years ago while
businesses that started 5-7 years ago represented 25%. This is illustrated in table
4.2
Table 4.2: Age of Business
AGE OF BUSINESS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
BELOW 5YRS 0 0%
5-7 YRS 8 25%
7-9 YRS 8 25%
ABOVE 10YRS 16 50%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.2 Ownership
Respondents were asked to select the type of ownership from a list of 3 types of
business which included sole proprietor, partnership and company, as shown
below in table 4.3
Table 4.3: Ownership
TYPE OF OWNERSHIP FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
SOLE PROPRIETOR 24 75%
PARTNERSHIP 4 12.5%
COMPANY 4 12.5%
TOTAL 32 100%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
54/76
75% of the enterprises were sole proprietorships while partnership and company
types of ownership each had 12.5% representation.
4.4.3 Annual Sales
Respondents were asked to state the annual sales of the business. 62.5% of the
MSMEs had annual turnover of Kshs.500, 000-Kshs.5, 000, 000; 18.75% of the
businesses ranged between Kshs.50, 000-Kshs.250, 000 annual sales and another
18.75% at Kshs.250, 000-Kshs.500, 000. None of the enterprises had annual
turnover of above Kshs.5, 000, 000. This is further illustrated below in Table 4.4
and Figure 4.1
Table 4.4: Annual Sales
TOTAL ANNUAL SALES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Kshs.50, 000-Kshs.250, 000 6 18.75%
Kshs.250, 000-Kshs.500, 000 6 18.75%
Kshs.500, 000-5, 000, 000 20 62.50%
Above Kshs.5, 000, 000 0 0%
TOTAL 32 100%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
55/76
4.4.4 Tax Regime
Respondents were asked to select the tax regime under which they are registered
with. 20 out of the 32 respondents chose TOT (Turnover Tax) which represented
62.5% while 37.5% chose VAT. This is further demonstrated in Table 4.5
below.
Table 4.5: Tax Regime
TAX REGIME FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
TOT 20 62.50%
VAT 12 37.50%
NONE 0 0%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.5 Identification of Simplification Procedures Related to TOT
Figure 4.1: Annual Sales
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
56/76
To achieve this objective, respondents were asked to choose from a list the types
of records they kept. The distribution is shown below in Table 4.6.
Table 4.6: Identification of Simplification Procedures Related to TOT
Types of Records Maintained Frequency Percentage
Cashbook 10 31.25%
Sales Receipts & Invoices 6 18.75%
Purchase Invoices 10 31.25%
Bank Statements 6 18.75%
TOTAL 32 100%
31.25% of the enterprises kept a cashbook; 18.75% kept sales receipts and
invoices; 31.25% kept purchases invoices while 18.75% kept bank statements.
4.4.6 Use of Technology
The respondents were asked whether they had integrated the use of technology
in their business. 75% of the respondents said Yes while 25% said No. This is
shown below in Table 4.7.
Table 4.7: Use of Technology
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 24 75%
No 8 25%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.7 Integration of Technological Equipment in the Business
The respondents were asked whether they had integrated the following
technological equipment in to the business, i.e. computer with internet access,
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
57/76
computer without internet access and electronic tax registers. 24 out of the 32
respondents had integrated ETR which was 75%. Only 6 enterprises (18.75%)
had a computer with internet access, while the rest had a computer without
internet access which represented 6.25%. This is shown below in Table 4.8.
Table 4.8: Integration of Technological Equipment in the Business
TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Computer with internet access 6 18.75%
Computer without internet access 2 6.25%
Electronic Tax Register 24 75%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.8 Filing of Returns
The respondents were asked whether the use of technology has made their filing
of returns easier. 93.75% of the respondents said Yes while 6.25% said No.
Table 4.9 below illustrates further.
Table 4.9: Filing of Returns
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 30 93.25%
No 2 6.25%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.9 KRA Online Services
The respondents were asked whether they access KRA online services. 75% of
the respondents said Yes while 25% said No. This is further illustrated below in
Table 4.10.
Table 4.10: KRA Online Services
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 24 75%No 8 25%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
58/76
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.10 Convenience of Electronic Tax Register
The respondents were asked to rate the convenience of the ETR to their business.
A rate scale of 1-5 was presented to the respondents, i.e.
5. Very Good 4. Good 3. Average 2. Poor 1.
Very Poor
75% of the respondents chose 4 making it a convenient machine in the business.
This is further illustrated in Table 4.11 and Figure 4.2 below.
Table 4.11: Convenience of ETR
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Very Good 4 12.50%
Good 24 75%
Average 2 6.25%
Poor 2 6.25%
Very Poor 0 0%TOTAL 32 100%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
59/76
Figure 4.2: Convenience of ETR
4.4.11 Do You Know When youre Supposed To File Your Tax Returns?
The respondents were asked whether they knew the time they are supposed to
file their returns. All the respondents said yes. This is illustrated in Table 4.12
below.
Table 4.12: Do you know when you're supposed to file your tax returns?
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 32 100%
No 0 0%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.12 How Often Do You File Returns On Time?
The respondents were asked how often they filed their tax returns on time. 30 out
of the 32 respondents (93.75%) said Yes while only 2 (6.25%) said No. Table
4.13 illustrates further.
Table 4.13: How Often Do You File Returns On Time?
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
60/76
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 30 93.75%
No 2 6.25%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.13 Tax Procedures
The respondents were asked whether they were aware of the tax procedures
necessary for filing returns. 50% of the respondents said Yes while 50% said No.
This can be further demonstrated by Table 4.14 below.
Table 4.14: Tax Procedures
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 16 50%
No 16 50%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.14 Which Tax Procedures Have Contributed To Your Timely Filing of
Returns
The respondents were requested to choose from a list of three tax procedures that
contributed most to their timely filing of returns. 28 of the respondents (87.5%)
chose tax computation. This is further illustrated below in Table 4.15
Table 4.15: Which Tax Procedures Have Contributed To Your Timely Filing of ReturnsRESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Elimination of consultancy costs 2 6.25%
Elimination of bookkeeping costs 2 6.25%
Tax Computation 28 87.50%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.15 Simplification of Tax Procedures
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
61/76
The respondents were requested to choose from a variety of options on how they
would rate the simplification of tax procedures. 62.5% of the respondents rated
the simplification of tax procedures as average. The analysis of this has been
shown below in Table 4.16 and Figure 4.3
Table 4.16: Simplification of Tax Procedures
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Excellent 2 6.25%
Good 6 18.75%
Average 20 62.50%
Poor 4 12.50%
Very Poor 0 0.00%
TOTAL 32 100%
Figure 4.3: Simplification of Tax Procedures
4.4.16 Are You Aware of the Penalties Charged Under the Kenya Tax
Laws?
The respondents were asked whether they were aware of the penalties charged
for tax evasion or late submission of tax returns. 93.75% said Yes while 6.25%
said No. Table 4.17 illustrates further.
Table 4.17: Are You Aware of the Penalties Charged Under the Kenya Tax
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
62/76
Laws?
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 30 93.75%
No 2 6.25%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.17 Have You Ever Been Penalized Due To Late Submission of Returns?
The respondents were asked whether they have ever been penalized for late
submission of returns. 6.25% of the respondents said Yes while 93.75% said No.
Table 4.18 illustrates further.
Table 4.18: Have You Ever Been Penalized For Late Submission of Returns?
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 2 6.25%
No 30 93.75%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.18 Stringency of Penalties
The respondents were requested to choose from a variety of options so as to rate
the stringency of penalties. 62.5% of the respondents rated the penalties as
average. This can further be demonstrated below by Table 4.19
Table 4.19: Stringency of Penalties
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Very Strong 2 6.25%
Strong 8 25%
Average 20 62.50%
Weak 2 6.25%
Very Weak 0 0.00%
TOTAL 32 100%
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
63/76
4.4.19 Influence of Penalties on Early Submission of Returns
The respondents were asked whether the imposition of penalties had influenced
their early submission of returns. 93.75% of the respondents said yes while
6.25% said No. This is further illustrated in Table 4.20 below
Table 4.20: Influence of Penalties on Early Submission of
Returns
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes 30 93.75%
No 2 6.25%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.4.20 Effectiveness of Tax Penalties
The respondents were requested to choose from a variety of options so as to rate
the effectiveness of tax penalties. 75% of the respondents said the penalties are
effective. This is further illustrated below in Table 4.21
Table 4.21: Effectiveness of Tax Penalties
RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Very Effective 2 6.25%
Effective 24 75%
Average 4 12.5%
Not effective 2 6.25%
Very Weak 0 0%
TOTAL 32 100%
4.5 Qualitative Analysis
The following are the findings obtained from the study:-
The number of MSMEs in Embu County was thirty-two (32). Most of the
MSMEs have been in existence for over ten years, with over 75% over the
enterprises being solely owned (sole proprietorships). 62.5% of the MSMEs
have an annual turnover of between Kshs.500,000-Kshs.5,000,000.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
64/76
Most of the enterprises have integrated the use of technology in their business
with 75% of the MSMEs integrating the use of the ETR machine. Technology
has enabled the MSMEs to file their returns on time with over 93.75%
acknowledgement. The convenience of the ETR machine has been greatly
acknowledged by the MSMEs.
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
65/76
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Introduction
The research was conducted with an aim of determining whether the
simplification of TOT collection methods has led to improved tax compliance in
Kenya. This chapter gives details of the summary of the data collected,
conclusion and recommendations based on the following.
5.2 Summary
5.2.1 Bio-Data
From all the enterprises interviewed, 50% have been in existence for more than
10 years, 25% between 7-9 years while 25% have been in existence between 5-7
years. All these businesses have been registered by the Registrar of Business.
75% of the enterprises were solely owned, 12.5% were partnerships whilst
12.5% were registered as private companies.
62.5% of the businesses had annual turnover between Kshs.500, 000 and Kshs.5,
000, 000; 18.75% Kshs.50, 000 and Kshs.250, 000 whereas 18.75% ranged
between Kshs.250, 000 and Kshs.500, 000. 62.5% of the MSMEs were
registered under the TOT regime while the rest under VAT regime.
31.25% of the enterprises kept purchase invoices, 31.25% kept a cashbook,
18.75% kept sales receipts & invoices whereas 18.75% kept bank statements.
This was an indication that the businesses maintained all the vital records.
5.2.2 Technology
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
66/76
75% of the enterprises had integrated the use of technology with 75% integrating
the use of ETR machines into their businesses. 93.75% of the enterprises
acknowledged that with the integration of technology into their businesses, it has
made their filing of returns easier. 75% of the MSMEs access KRA online
services with 75% of the enterprises acknowledging that the ETR machine has
been of good convenience to them.
5.2.3 Simplicity of Collection Methods
All the businesses were fully aware of when they are supposed to file in their tax
returns, with 93.75% of them always filing their returns on time. 50% of the
MSMEs knew the tax procedures necessary for filing returns with 87.5% rooting
for tax computation as the tax procedure that has contributed to their timely
filing of returns. 62.5% of the businesses rated the simplification of tax
procedures as average with only 6.25% rating it as excellent.
5.2.4 Tax Penalty
93.75% of the enterprises were aware of the tax penalties with only 6.25% not
fully aware. 6.25% of the MSMEs have ever been penalized for late submission
of returns, with 62.5% saying the stringency of penalties is average. 93.75% of
the businesses acknowledged that the imposition of penalties has influenced their
early submission of returns. 75% of the enterprises said the enterprises were
effective.
5.3 Conclusions
5.3.1 Bio Data
-
7/31/2019 Bcom Project[1]
67/76
From the study,
it can be concluded that the businesses have been operating for some time with
most of them being within the TOT threshold. A significant number of these
enterprises are solely owned (sole proprietorships) with rest being either
partnerships or private companies. All these enterprises maintain all the vital
records, i.e. purchase invoice, sales receipts and invoice, cashbook and bank
statements.
5.3.2 Technology
From the research conducted, it can be concluded that most
top related