bio fortification for enhanced nutrition in rice by conventional and molecular approaches
Post on 21-Jan-2017
857 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Bio fortification for enhanced nutrition in rice:Conventional and molecular approaches
Presented By, SATHISHA T N
Depart. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS Dharwad
1
2
Content
• Introduction• Merits of Biofortification of rice• Biofortification of Fe and Zn Conventional approaches Molecular approaches• Biofrtification of Pro vit- A • Conclusion
3
4
5
Vitamin A deficiency– 250,000 children per year go blind– 124 million children worldwide are
deficient in vitamin A
Iron deficiency – More than 1.6 billion people ,in world
deficient of iron– approximately 25 % of population– Developing country 50 % of anemia
Zinc deficiency– More than 400,000 children die due
to zinc deficency– Most of the poor in Asia suffer
Anemia Prevalence and Number of Individuals Affected
WHO Region
Preschool Age Children Pregnant Women Non-pregnant women
Prevalence (%)
No. affected (mill.)
Prevalence (%)
No. affected (mill.)
Prevalence (%)
No. affected (mill.)
Africa 68 84 57 17 48 70 Americas 29 23 24 4 18 39 South-East Asia
66 115 48 18 46 182
Europe 22 11 25 3 19 41 Eastern Mediterranean
47 1 44 7 32 40
Western Pacific
23 27 31 8 22 97
Global 47 293 42 56 30 468
Source: Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993-2005, World Health Organization, 20086
Zinc Deficiency Among Children Under Age 5
Region Prevalence(%) Deaths(‘000) DALYs lost(‘000)
East Asia & Pacific 7 15 1,004
East Europe & Central Asia
10 4 149
Latin America & Caribbean
33 15 587
Middle East & North Africa
46 94 3,290
South Asia 79 252 8,510
Sub-Saharan Africa 50 400 14,094
High Income Countries 5 0 2
7
8
Biofortification
9
Advantages of Biofortification• Targets the poor: eat high levels of food staples• Rural-based: complements fortification and supplementation• Cost-effective: research at a central location can be multiplied
across countries and time• Sustainable: investments are front-loaded, low recurrent costs
Greek word “bios” means “life” Latin word “fortificare” means “make strong” MAKE LIFE STRONG!
“Bio-fortification is the enrichment of staple food crops with essential micronutrients”. Sally Brooks,
Biofortification
11
CONVENTIONAL APPROACHES
12
Nutrient content of rice
Source: FAO Rice Factsheet, 2004
13
Fe and Zn distribution in rice grain
14
Screening of germplasm for high iron and zinc content
Genetic variation in Iron and zinc content in IRRI
Gregorio et al., 2000
Total 1138 12.2 (6.3-24.4) 25.3 (23.5-58.4)
15
16
Fe and Zn contents in the four rice varietal groups
Lee et al.,(2008)
17
Iron and zinc content of some selected varieties
Gregorio et al., 2000
18
19
Gregorio et al., 2000
Iron content of selected variety after polishing
20
Effect of milling on iron concentration in rice
21
Sl No
Name Grain type
Fe(mg/ 100g) content in polished rice
0 % 5% 10%
1 MSE-9 LB 3.44 1.24 1.08
2 Kalanamak SB 3.40 1.21 1.09
3 Kanachana MS 2.04 1.28 0.66
4 Karjat- 4 MS 2.56 2.06 1.90
5 Chittimutyalu SB 2.49 1.40 0.98
6 Udayagiri SB 3.01 0.95 0.90
7 Jyothi LB 1.98 1.49 0.40
8 VRM-7 SB 2,28 0.79 0.78
9 Metta Triveni SB 2.61 0.70 0.70
10 Versha SB 3.75 1.12 0.81
Rice varieties with high Fe content in grains
22DRR Hydrabad
23
Sl No
Name Grain type
Zn(mg/ 100g) content in polished rice
0 % 5% 10%
1 Chittimutyalu SB 3.05 2.57 2.44
2 Poornima SS 3.13 2.78 2.70
3 ADT-43 MS 3.09 2.66 2.09
4 Ranbir Basmati LS 3.09 2.83 2.74
5 Type-3 LB 3.03 2.83 2.65
6 Udayagiri SB 3.01 1.95 1.13
7 Ratna LS 3.27 2.52 2.30
8 Jyothi LB 3.13 2.24 2.06
9 Panta Sugandh 17
LS 3.25 2.47 2.06
10 Kesari MS 3.15 1.99 1.93
Rice varieties with high Zn content in grain in India
DRR Hydrabad
24
Fe and Zn content in popular cultivar
Scientist Material Fe zn
Lee et al., (2008) 246 rice germplasm
2.02 to 12.0 (mg/Kg)
10.0 to 33.0 (mg/Kg)
Ravindra Babu et al. (2012)
173 varieties and 21 hybrids
2.4 (PTB-51) to 34.4 (MSE 9)
10.1 (Karjat 3) to 32.7(Ratna) (mg/kg)
Virk et al. (2006b,2007)
15 genotypes 7.4 (mg/kg) 23.26 (mg/kg)
Senadhar et al., (1998) 939 varieties 7.4-24 (mg/kg)
Prom u Thai et al., 2007
Australien varieties
10- 20 (mg/kg)
Prom u Thai and Rerkasen (2001)
Thai rice varieties 7-22 (mg/kg)
Pintasen et al ., (2007) 17 Thai rice varieties
10.8-16.2 (mg/kg)
Martinez et al., 2009 5743 milled rice in CIAT & NARS
5-7 (mg/kg)
EMBRAPATraditional variety
(12.6-42.2 ppm)
25
26
Hybridization followed selection
• Popular cultivar 1.3 to 1.5 mg/ 100 g
White x purple
2.1 mg/ 100 g
KDC x Hom Pamah
313-19-1-1 (White color rice) 2.8 mg/ 100 g
O nivar x JaoHom Nin (JHN)
5 mg/ 100 g rice
27
High iron rice
IR 72 x Zawa Bonday
IR 68144-3B-2-2-321 ppm
• Early mature • Tolerance to tungro virus• No seed dormancy • Excellent seedling vigour• 10% below yield than IR-72
28
Fe and Zn content in Popular rice hybrids in Indiacharecter Protien Iron (mg
/100g)Zinc
(mg/100g)
1. DRRH-2A 9.79 12.58 4.382. PA 6129 8.86 8.95 4.263. Sahyadri-2 9.45 7.91 3.874. Sahyadri-4 8.8 10.48 4.35. Pusa RH-10 8.26 4.52 3.756. Indirasona 7.64 7.85 3.877. GK 5003 7.39 8.15 3.848. PSD-3 5.74 7.29 3.999. Sahyadri-3 7.67 4.13 3.0710. PA 6201 7.86 7.76 4.5911. HSD-1 7.84 6.76 3.1712. PA 6444 7.15 6.11 3.7213. Suruchi 7.93 6.87 3.3514. JKRH-2000 7.42 7.15 3.5515. US 312 7.47 6.62 3.7616. CORH-3 8.1 7.37 3.5317. KRH-2 6.49 4.39 3.4318. Sahyadri-1 7.74 5.9 3.3319. PHB-71 8.48 2.89 3.8120. CRHR-5 8.59 2.96 3.1521. CRHR-7 8.3 6.93 3.62Mean 7.95 6.84 3.73
29
Correlation among iron and zinc content in rice grain
(Nagesh et al ., 2012)
Phenotypic and Genotypic Correlation coefficient for Iron and Zinc in 48 rice hybrids
30
31
Estimation of heterosis for grain iron and zinc content
6 lines x 8 testers 48 hybrids
SH1- SwarnaSH 2- Chitimutayalu
Nagesh et al., 2012
32
33
G x E interaction for iron and zinc
Grain zinc content (ppm) of promising rice genotypes grown in 3 environments
Virk et al. (2006b,2007)34
35
Fe concentration in 10 genotypes in 4 location Wet and Dry season
Dry season
Wet season
(Suwarto and Nasrullah 2011)
36
Genotype x Environment interaction on iron concentration in rice
Suwarto and Nasrullah 2011
37
Mutation breeding
38
Rice mutant with high iron and zinc content
IR-64
Sodium azide (NaN3)
258 M8 generation mutants
Analysed for micronutrient and yield along with check IR-64
Polished rice Fe Zn
IR-64 3.9 (mg / kg) 16 (mg / kg)
mutants 0.91 to 28.10 (mg / kg) 15.36 to 28.95 (mg / kg)
39
Frequency distribution of Fe and Zn in mutants
40
Principle coordinate analysis for wild type cultivar IR-64 and 254 NaN3 -induce mutants
41
Micronutrient Mean (mg/Kg) Range (mg/Kg)
Fe 4.02 0.11-28.10
Zn 15.6 8.37-28.95MN 8.12 4.56-25.72
Cu 2.97 0.06-10.06
Micro-minerals in the polished rice grains of selected NaN3-induced mutants
Mutants Fe (mg / Kg) Zn (mg /Kg) Mn (mg / Kg) Cu(mg / Kg)
M-IR-75 28.10 15.36 7.28 3.74
M-IR-58 27.26 17.44 8.24 6.07
M-IR-180 0.91 26.58 9.32 1.77
M-IR-49 3.48 28.95 6.91 4.05
M-IR-175 13.36 26.16 9.78 5.59
IR-64 3.90 16.00 8.00 2.85
42
Grain yields of selected mutants grown in different crop seasons
43
MOLECULAR APPROACHES TO IMPROVE GRAIN QUALITY IN RICE
Molecular Mapping of High Iron and Zinc Rich Regions in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grains Using Microsatellite
Markers
Nagesh et al., 2013
Swarna × Madhukar
44
178 F 2 population
72 SSR marker
45
Parental polymorphism survey between Swarna and Madhukar
SC-120, SC-128
SC-129(33.56 %)
46
Selective genotyping for rapid identification of regions associated with iron and zinc content
Swarna × Madhukar
47
Segregation pattern of SSR primers
Legend: M-100bp DNA marker, P1 – Swarna, P2 – Madhukar
48
Single marker analysis for iron and zinc with SC120, SC128 and SC129
Swarna × Madhukar
178 F2 population
SC120, SC128 and SC129 markers screened
49
Identification of QTLs for mineral contents in rice grain
50
Identification of QTL for micronutrient from a wild rice
Teqing X wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) 3 back cross with Teqing
85 introgression lines (ILs)`
Oliveira et al ., 2008
(179 polymorphic SSR)
51
Micronutrient content in parent and introgression lines grown during 2 season
52
Phenotypic variance for micronutrient in introgression lines (ILs)
53
QTLs identified for micronutrient traits in introgression lines
Fe
Fe
Zn
Zn
Zn
54
Mapping QTLs for iron and zinc content in rice
168 RILS
101 SSR + 9 GENE SPECIFIC MARKERS
Anuradha et al. 2012
Madhukar × Swarna
Unpolished rice
Fe (ppm) Zn (ppm)
Madukar 17.3 57.3
Swarna 22.5 27.2
RILs 0.2-224 0.4 to 104
Mean 30.9 48.2
55
Distribution of Fe and Zn concentration in 168 RILs
56
(14)
(4)RM 535
Markers linked to Fe and Zn in Madhukar × Swarna RILs
57
QTL mapping for Fe and Zn concentrationComposite interval mapping
13 QTLs
58
Identification of QTL Fe and Zn
59
Putative candidate genes for QTLs governing Fe and Zn
60
Bio fortification of rice by transgenic approaches
61
Fe accumulation in rice seeds1. Iron storage protein: Soybean ferritin gene expression using endosperm-specific promoters, Ferritin is a ubiquitous protein stores about 4,000 Fe atoms in a complex.
2. Iron translocation over production of the natural metal chelator nicotianamine Os NAS genes,
3. Iron flux into the endosperm by means of iron(II)-nicotiana mine transporter OsYSL2 expression under the control of an endosperm-specific promoter and sucrose transporter promoter
62
Soybean ferritin chimeric gene in the pGPTV-bar/ Fer vector
PCR analysis showing amplification of 0.78 kb size band of ferritin gene
Enhanced iron and zinc accumulation in transgenic rice with the ferritin gene
Vasconcelos et al.2003
Lane 1, non-transformed control plant2, plasmid control3, blank;4, 5, 7, 8 and 9, five individual transformants6, negative regenerated plant. M, 1 kb DNA molecular marker.
63
64
Iron detection in transverse sections of rice endosperm
Non transgenic IR68144
TransgenicIR68144
65
Iron and zinc concentrations in brown seeds of transgenic To lines (Fr) and control of IR68144
Average Fe and Zn concentrations in transgenic (lines 1/4) of IR68144
66
Iron biofortification by introduction of multiple genes by transgenic approaches
67
Gene cassette introduced into rice to produce the Fer-NAS-YSL2 lines
Japonica rice cultivar Tsukinohikari
68
Detection of transgene insertion in the transgenic lines by PCR
69
Ferritin accumulation in T2 brown seeds Western blot analysis.
70
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of OsYSL2 and HvNAS1. (a) OsYSL2 and (b) HvNAS1 expression levels. T2 plants
71
Fe concentration of T2 polished seeds
72
FeZn
Cd
Metal concentration in T3 polished seeds obtained from the paddy field
73
NT= non-transgenic rice; AN= OsActin1 promoter–HvNAS1 line; Fer= NAS-YSL2 transgenic lines 15-8, 16-2, 19-2, 19-4, 19-5, and 32-3,
T3 seeds Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu concentrations in brown seeds
74
Plant height and yield data transgenic lines in field experiment
75
The problem with rice:• Does not express
phytoene synthase in endosperm
• Does not express phytoene desaturase or z-carotene desaturase
Golden Rice
Development of golden rice
Fig. 1
Rice grain Golden ricewhite rice
Fig. 2
76
77
Schematic diagram of the gene cassettes in the two plasmids used to cotransform maize callus
78
Psy orthologous gene in different sources
79
Schematic diagram of the T-DNAs used to generate golden rice-2
80
Golden rice-2 lines
81
82
83
84
• Golden rice fulfills the wishes of the GMO opposition• It was not developed by industry, and industry does not benefit
from it• It presents a sustainable, cost-free solution, not requiring other
resources• It is given free of charge and it benefits the poor and
disadvantaged• It does not create new dependencies on, or advantages for, rich
landowners• It can be resown every year from saved seed• It does not reduce agricultural or natural biodiversity• It does not present any negative impact on the environment or
risk to human health
Overcoming the GMO opposition
85
Objectives of investigation1. Screening germplasm / traditional landraces for protein, iron
and zinc content.
2. Evaluating promising germplasm with higher protein, iron and zinc in different soil types / environments
3. To estimate G X E interaction for protein, iron and zinc along with yield.
86
Master’s Research
Genetic variation among traditional landraces of rice with specific reference nutritional quality
Diversity in traditional varieties
87
Fe (mg /Kg)
Zn (mg / Kg)
Min 19.6 22Max 46 67Mean 30 43
88
Entry No Name
Zinc (mg/kg)
Iron (mg/kg)
1 65 Bili Kalavi 46 42.3
2 14 Dodigya 44.4 32.1
3 66 Dodiga 43.9 37.3
4 61 Gopal Dodiga 43.7 44.7
5 4 Ambemohor -1 42.2 37.4
6 19 Hakkalkarisali 40.1 50.2
7 11 Chandibatta 39.5 53.5
8 5 Ambemohor-2 38.2 57.9
9 63 Budda 38.1 43.7
10 9 Belgaum Basmati 37 50.7
11 44 Kumud-1 34.7 55.2
12 121 Antara Sali 28.6 56.5
Top iron and zinc rich lines
Sl.No Name Zn(mg/ 100g)
1 Chittimutyalu 3.05
2 ADT-43 3.09
3 Udayagiri 3.01
4 Ratna 3.27
5 Jyothi 3.13
Sl No Name Fe(mg/ 100g)
1 MSE-9 34.4
2 Kalanamak 34.0
3 Chittimutyalu 24.9
4 Udayagiri 30.1
5 Jyothi 19.8
Checks
89
Focus on “better” food,not only “more” food
The expected rewards are high…
Thank You90
top related