brain computer interfacing project - review - the eeg
Post on 14-Apr-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
1/4
5/15/13 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/rev1.html
Brain Computer Interfacing Project
Introduction
Review
Off-line BCI
On-line BCI
Technical
Developments
Data
Links
PARG Pages
BCI Review - The EEG
The EEG is recorded between electrodes placed in standard positions on
the scalp and has a typical amplitude of 2-100 microvolts and a frequency
spectrum from 0.1 to 60 Hz. Most activity occurs within the followingfrequency bands; delta (0.5 - 4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta
(13-22 Hz) and gamma (30-40 Hz).
The potential at the scalp derives from electrical activity of large
synchronised groups of neurons inside the brain. The activity of single
neurons or small groups is attenuated too much by the skull and scalp to be
detected at the scalp surface.
EEG activity in particular frequency bands is often correlated with particular
cognitive states. Signals in the alpha band, for example, are associatedwith relaxation. Thus, an electrode placed over the visual cortex that
detects alpha band signals is detecting visual relaxation. An electrode over
the motor cortex picking up alpha band signals is detecting motor relaxation
(the mu rhythm).
http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/index.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/links.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/data.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/technical.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/online.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/offline.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/review.htmlhttp://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/index.html -
7/30/2019 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
2/4
5/15/13 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/rev1.html
Brain-Computer interfaces use EEG signals which can be controlled by the
user. These types of EEG signals fall into two main classes; evoked
responses which are EEG components evoked by a specific sensory
stimulus, such as a flashing light, and spontaneous EEG signals which
consist of EEG components that occur without stimulus, such as the alpha
rhythm or the mu rhythm. Note, however, that some spontaneous EEG
signals such as the mu rhythm can be affected by stimuli.
The ability of subjects to produce at will strong spontaneous EEG rhythms
such as the alpha rhythm or the mu rhythm can be enhanced by the use ofbiofeedbackor operant conditioning. This is a process whereby the user is
given an indication as to how well he/she is controlling a device (eg. by
looking at it). This constitutes the `feedback'. The subject then changes
their EEG signal in response to this feedback. In this way, the subject to
learns control the device through a learning process which can take several
hours, days or weeks to complete. BCI systems developed in the 1960s
and 1970s relied on biofeedback. It has the advantage of being simple but
requires long training times for each user.
Evoked Responses used in BCI research fall into three main classes;Evoked Potentials (DC changes in response to continuous evoking
stimulus), Event-Related Potentials (DC changes in response to a discrete
event) and Event-Related Desynchronisations (AC changes in response to
a discrete event).
Evoked Potentials (EPs) require a specific external stimulus and originate
in sensory cortex areas. A typical evoked potential is the Visual Evoked
Potential (VEP). In response to a strobe light, for example, the EEG over
the visual cortex will vary at the same frequency as the stimulating light.
-
7/30/2019 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
3/4
5/15/13 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~parg/projects/bci/rev1.html
u ec s can e ra ne o con ro e s reng o e r s ea y s a e
with the use of biofeedback. This forms the basis of other BCI systems.
Because the EEG control signal is at a precise, known and controllable
frequency it is very easy to detect. This means that the subsequent signal
processing and pattern recognition tasks are very simple . The
disadvantage of such methods is the need for an external stimulus and the
long training time required.
Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) occur in response to, or in advance ofparticular `events'. The P300 ERP, for example, occurs 300 ms after an
event occurs to which the subject has been told to respond. The event
must be one in a series of Bernouilli events (ie. one of two types) and have
a low probability of occuring.
Event-Related Synchronizations or Desynchronizations (ERS/ERD) are AC
changes which occur in response to events (whereas ERPs are DC
changes). The mu rhythm, for example, is desychnronized by movement,
tactile stimulation or by planned movement (the pictures below show
images of the head from above - the left image is for a subject planning a
right hand movement and the right image is for planned left hand movement
- dark areas correspond to strong mu rhythm ERD).
Interfaces based on ERPs and ERDs do not, in principle, require any
training of the user. The user does not, for example, have to learn to control
his ERD - it is already present in any subject who intends to move his
finger. This advantage is offset by the fact that ERDs are harder to detect.
EPs, ERPs and ERDs are signals between 2 and 10 microvolts in strength.
They are therefore difficult to detect in the background EEG signal of 100
microvolts. In clinical research a signal averaging method is used whereby
the stimulus or event is repeated a large number of times and the
responses are averaged. In this way. the parts of the EEG signal that are
not relevant to the 'event' are averaged out. This takes many minutes or
hours of signal capture. On-line BCI systems cannot use this method as
they must respond within seconds. They must therefore use the non-
averaged EEG. Thus more complex signal processing methods are used
which require more computer power.
Electrode placement and the subsequent signal processing can be guided
by what is known of the neurophysiology of the mechanisms that generate
the EEG signals. Thus, for example, systems using the mu rhythm ERD will
-
7/30/2019 Brain Computer Interfacing Project - Review - The EEG
4/4
top related