building-integrated heat & moisture exchange · 0 20 40 6 0 80 100 120 140 16 0 order quan ty...
Post on 12-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Building-Integrated Heat amp Moisture Exchange 2014 Building Technologies Office Peer Review
John E Breshears jbreshearsarchitecturalapplicationscom
Architectural Applications
Project Summary
Timeline Start date October 2012
Planned end date August 2014
Key Milestones
Mid- amp Full-scale Lab Tests June 2013
Full-scale Demo January 2014
System Documentation July 2014
Budget Total DOE $ to date $1037812
Total future DOE $ $0 (committed to date)
Target MarketAudience
Owners developers and operators of medium-large scale commercial institutional amp multi-use buildings in warm humid climates
Key Partners
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
dPoint Technologies Inc
Arup
ETH Zurich
Membrane Technology amp Research Inc
Project Goal
Design amp demonstrate at increasing scales the energy benefits of large-scale wall-integrated heat amp moisture exchangers
Characterize both the ventilation energy benefit as well as the insulation benefit of this hybrid envelopehvac technology
2
Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement
State-of-the-industry energy recovery ventilators (ERVrsquos) offer low humidity exchange (εlatent =045-065) with high attendant pressure penalties (200-350 Pa) resulting in low market penetration and limited impact
Integrated ERV solutions could leverage multiple advantages to produce better a better ROI and reap more of the nearly 3 quads of potential US savings available annually
Target Market and Audience
The target market for AirFlow PanelsTM includes developers owners and operators of commercial and multi-family residential buildings
Square Footage Energy Savings Potential
New Construction 108 B 072 Quads
Renovation 257 B 188 Quads
2013 US Market Size (maximum adoption potential)
3
Purpose and Objectives Impact of Project
The key to achieving significant impact in energy savings is to overcome the resistance to adoption of decentralized outdoor air paths (as opposed to conventionally centralized) and combined hvac and envelope functions (as opposed to segregated)
Toward this goal project deliverables include
1 validated testing at various scales
2 operational installation demonstrating the benefits
near term
3 pilot installations
build awareness
certifications (ahri)
industry collaboration
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
15 installations
sales partnership
manufacturing
supply chain
150+ installations
strategic partner
International sales
scale up manuf
4
Approach
Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns
Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger
bull Polymeric membrane-based
bull Higher transfer surface area
bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss
bull Manufactured in a panelized form
bull Integrated into modular wall panels
bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance
5
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Project Summary
Timeline Start date October 2012
Planned end date August 2014
Key Milestones
Mid- amp Full-scale Lab Tests June 2013
Full-scale Demo January 2014
System Documentation July 2014
Budget Total DOE $ to date $1037812
Total future DOE $ $0 (committed to date)
Target MarketAudience
Owners developers and operators of medium-large scale commercial institutional amp multi-use buildings in warm humid climates
Key Partners
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
dPoint Technologies Inc
Arup
ETH Zurich
Membrane Technology amp Research Inc
Project Goal
Design amp demonstrate at increasing scales the energy benefits of large-scale wall-integrated heat amp moisture exchangers
Characterize both the ventilation energy benefit as well as the insulation benefit of this hybrid envelopehvac technology
2
Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement
State-of-the-industry energy recovery ventilators (ERVrsquos) offer low humidity exchange (εlatent =045-065) with high attendant pressure penalties (200-350 Pa) resulting in low market penetration and limited impact
Integrated ERV solutions could leverage multiple advantages to produce better a better ROI and reap more of the nearly 3 quads of potential US savings available annually
Target Market and Audience
The target market for AirFlow PanelsTM includes developers owners and operators of commercial and multi-family residential buildings
Square Footage Energy Savings Potential
New Construction 108 B 072 Quads
Renovation 257 B 188 Quads
2013 US Market Size (maximum adoption potential)
3
Purpose and Objectives Impact of Project
The key to achieving significant impact in energy savings is to overcome the resistance to adoption of decentralized outdoor air paths (as opposed to conventionally centralized) and combined hvac and envelope functions (as opposed to segregated)
Toward this goal project deliverables include
1 validated testing at various scales
2 operational installation demonstrating the benefits
near term
3 pilot installations
build awareness
certifications (ahri)
industry collaboration
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
15 installations
sales partnership
manufacturing
supply chain
150+ installations
strategic partner
International sales
scale up manuf
4
Approach
Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns
Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger
bull Polymeric membrane-based
bull Higher transfer surface area
bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss
bull Manufactured in a panelized form
bull Integrated into modular wall panels
bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance
5
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement
State-of-the-industry energy recovery ventilators (ERVrsquos) offer low humidity exchange (εlatent =045-065) with high attendant pressure penalties (200-350 Pa) resulting in low market penetration and limited impact
Integrated ERV solutions could leverage multiple advantages to produce better a better ROI and reap more of the nearly 3 quads of potential US savings available annually
Target Market and Audience
The target market for AirFlow PanelsTM includes developers owners and operators of commercial and multi-family residential buildings
Square Footage Energy Savings Potential
New Construction 108 B 072 Quads
Renovation 257 B 188 Quads
2013 US Market Size (maximum adoption potential)
3
Purpose and Objectives Impact of Project
The key to achieving significant impact in energy savings is to overcome the resistance to adoption of decentralized outdoor air paths (as opposed to conventionally centralized) and combined hvac and envelope functions (as opposed to segregated)
Toward this goal project deliverables include
1 validated testing at various scales
2 operational installation demonstrating the benefits
near term
3 pilot installations
build awareness
certifications (ahri)
industry collaboration
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
15 installations
sales partnership
manufacturing
supply chain
150+ installations
strategic partner
International sales
scale up manuf
4
Approach
Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns
Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger
bull Polymeric membrane-based
bull Higher transfer surface area
bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss
bull Manufactured in a panelized form
bull Integrated into modular wall panels
bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance
5
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Purpose and Objectives Impact of Project
The key to achieving significant impact in energy savings is to overcome the resistance to adoption of decentralized outdoor air paths (as opposed to conventionally centralized) and combined hvac and envelope functions (as opposed to segregated)
Toward this goal project deliverables include
1 validated testing at various scales
2 operational installation demonstrating the benefits
near term
3 pilot installations
build awareness
certifications (ahri)
industry collaboration
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
15 installations
sales partnership
manufacturing
supply chain
150+ installations
strategic partner
International sales
scale up manuf
4
Approach
Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns
Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger
bull Polymeric membrane-based
bull Higher transfer surface area
bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss
bull Manufactured in a panelized form
bull Integrated into modular wall panels
bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance
5
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Approach
Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns
Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger
bull Polymeric membrane-based
bull Higher transfer surface area
bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss
bull Manufactured in a panelized form
bull Integrated into modular wall panels
bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance
5
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
Key Issues
I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope
heat amp moisture exchange
II Assessing the feasibility of achieving
theoretically predicted performance in practice
III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp
operation issues including
a balance of system design
(eg fans filters dampers etc)
b coderegulatory issues
(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)
c manufacturing methods
(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)
6
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
MILESTONE
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RH
ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
εsensεlatentΔPUeff
Dimensions
AirFlowRate
SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH
FanEnergyReduction
CoolingEnergyReduction
1Medium-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
2Full-scale
laboratorytest
(Berkeley)
3Full-scale
operational
demonstration
(Singapore)
PROPOSED ACTUAL
gt088
gt082
lt80Pa
097-099
076-088
53-113Pa
5-3x6-6x3
gt088
gt082
3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10
22cfm 40-90cfm
Datameasurementsin
progress
Datameasurements
complete(April2014)
DataAnalyssinprocess
gt082
=085Uactual 075-11Uactual
=085Uactual
lt80Pa
3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3
22-44cfm
gt088
3-3x5-3x3
22-44cfm
Progress and Accomplishments
7
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
8
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Coolin
gLoad
[W]
FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]
Ven la onAirCoolingLoad
Control
AirFlowPanel
015
020
025
030
035
040
045
050
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Ueff
[Wm
2K]
DeltaT[C]
Effec veWallUValue
Control
AirFlowPanel
Measured Performance
bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088
bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa
bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test
-500
000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
LocalFlux1(W)
LocalFlux2(W)
LocalFlux3(W)
LocalFlux4(W)
LocalFlux5(W)
LocalFlux6(W)
LocalFlux7(W)
LocalFlux8(W)
LocalFlux9(W)
LocalFlux10(W)
LocalFlux11(W)
LocalFlux12(W)
-3000
-2000
-1000
000
1000
2000
3000
4000
32214000
32214224
32214448
32214712
32214936
322141200
322141424
322141648
322141912
322142136
32314000
Intake-DeltaT(C)
Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)
Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data
9
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration
ETH Zurich Singaporendash
currently collecting raw data
10
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
]
]
]
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con
x10x
[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]
Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area
Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York
11
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
$4000
$6000
$8000
$10000
$12000
$14000
$16000
$18000
$20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
OrderQuan ty
ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve
CostUnit
PriceUnit
Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION
ORDERQUANITITY5
START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$
MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$
EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA
OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA
TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$
Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units
12
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT
13
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Progress and Accomplishments
Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence
1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156
2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200
4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144
7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Temperature[C]
TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office
OutdoorAir
ZoneSupply
ERVSupply
ZoneAir
ERVExhaust
Projected annual savings
[KWhm2 ( below baseline)
EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads
near term
4 pilot installation discussions
strategic industry partner discussions
Impact Trajectory
intermediate term long term
manuf study built into supply chain
sales partnership discussions
international sales partnership
scale up manuf
14
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Project Integration and Collaboration
Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)
bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)
bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning
bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)
Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants
Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies
National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering
bull HVAC Engineering
Portland Ten bull Commercialization
15
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Next Steps and Future Plans
Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012
AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012
Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)
bull Build sales pipeline
bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods
bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)
16
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
REFERENCE SLIDES
17
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Project Budget DOE Cost Share
Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120
Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated
Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)
Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)
Budget History
FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)
FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)
FY2015 (planned)
DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd
18
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded
ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4
Milestones
1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications
2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication
3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination
4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project
19
top related