c andler c ounty s chool d istrict
Post on 02-Jan-2016
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Welcome!Welcome!
““Management Tools Workshop”Management Tools Workshop”
Georgia School Board AssociationGeorgia School Board Association
Saturday, February 23, 2008Saturday, February 23, 2008
Essential Question(s)Essential Question(s)
How Do You Presently EvaluateYour School Superintendent?
What Has To Occur To Evaluate Your SuperintendentOn The Identified District Goals/Performance Measures?
Desired ResultsDesired Results
Align District Goal Areas With Performance Measures/Superintendent Evaluation
Connect Initiatives And ResourcesTo Performance Measures
How To Get Started?How To Get Started?
Call Billy Johnsonwith Georgia School Board Association (GSBA)
And Arrange For Trainingwith Your Board And Superintendent
What’s Involved With Connecting Your What’s Involved With Connecting Your Superintendent’s Evaluation With District Performance Superintendent’s Evaluation With District Performance
Measures?Measures?
Dialogue Between Board Members & Superintendent
Determine What You Want To Measure (Superintendent Can Help Determine Goal Areas)
Determine Present Status Of What You Are Going To Measure
Establish Targets (Over 3 Years)
Identify A Measurable Vision In Order To Link Your Goal Areas As Well As Performance Measures
BeforeBefore
Vision – To be the model for exemplary rural school districts in Georgia
AfterAfter
Vision – Our vision for Candler County Schools is for all students to meet or exceed Georgia Accountability measures, for the graduation rate to continuously improve 80% and above, for the system to be ranked in the top quartile of comparable systems in Georgia.
We will accomplish this vision with high expectations, significantly improved Literacy practices, multiple
interventions, community and parent engagement and alignment from Pre-K-12. As a result of our success, we will attract high performing teachers and new business
and industry, and our graduates will be prepared to continue post-secondary options or pursue gainful
employment.
BeforeBefore Belief The engagement of effective teaching energizes and maximizes learning
AfterAfter Belief/Commitment Statements
We believe and are committed to: continuously improving the graduation rate; an aligned standards-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment that provides for extended learning opportunities for all students; effective teaching that energizes and maximizes active learning for all students; significantly improving the literacy level of all students; data driven collaborative decision making; professional growth for all of our colleagues; parent and community involvement to enhance learning.
BeforeBefore Belief The engagement of effective teaching energizes and maximizes learning
AfterAfter Belief/Commitment Statements
We believe and are committed to: continuously improving the graduation rate; an aligned standards-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment that provides for extended learning opportunities for all students; effective teaching that energizes and maximizes active learning for all students; significantly improving the literacy level of all students; data driven collaborative decision making; professional growth for all of our colleagues; parent and community involvement to enhance learning.
District Goal AreasDistrict Goal Areas
GOAL 1 – Academic/Student PerformanceGraduation RateImprove Mastery of Georgia Performance StandardsReduce Achievement Gap(Examples of Strategic Objectives)
GOAL 2 – Student, Parent and Community Involvement
GOAL 3 – Internal and External Processes
GOAL 4 – Collaboration, Teamwork and Professional Growth
Example Of Performance Measure(s)Example Of Performance Measure(s)
Percentage of Students Meeting Promotion Criteria (Grade 3)
Percentage of Students Meeting Promotion Criteria (Grade 3) (After Summer School)
Percentage of Middle School Students With Disabilities Level 2 or 3 on CRCT Math
Percentage of Teachers Who Meet Rubric Standards For 6 Points of an Effective Math Lesson
Board Approved Balanced Scorecard Board Approved Balanced Scorecard September 20, 2007September 20, 2007
Superintendent Evaluation Superintendent Evaluation ProcessesProcesses
Superintendent Met With Two Board Members To Discuss Alignment Of Balanced Scorecard Goals To
The Superintendent’s Evaluation
Proposed Superintendent Evaluation Proposed Superintendent Evaluation Prepared For Full Board Review At Prepared For Full Board Review At
The Monthly WorkshopThe Monthly Workshop
Board Approves Superintendent Evaluation September 2007
Board Evaluates Superintendent Board Evaluates Superintendent January 2008 Utilizing New January 2008 Utilizing New
InstrumentInstrument
Comments by Board Chair Craig Lanier
Next StepsNext Steps
Board Intends To Meet In Intervals Of Four Board Intends To Meet In Intervals Of Four Months To Review Artifacts And Evidence Months To Review Artifacts And Evidence
Regarding Performance Measures Of Regarding Performance Measures Of Superintendent EvaluationSuperintendent Evaluation
How Has The Superintendent’s How Has The Superintendent’s Evaluation Been Perceived By The Evaluation Been Perceived By The
Public?Public?
Board Chair Craig Lanier Reflects
FY-08 Budget Linked To Balanced FY-08 Budget Linked To Balanced Scorecard Goal AreasScorecard Goal Areas
SummarySummary
Who Will Attempt To Verbalize How Who Will Attempt To Verbalize How The Superintendent’s Evaluation Can The Superintendent’s Evaluation Can
Be Linked Directly To District Be Linked Directly To District Goals/Performance Measures?Goals/Performance Measures?
top related