(c3) le petit chef
Post on 02-Dec-2014
247 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
M9721807 Tiffany Putri
M9721803 Sulistio Handayani
M9721002 Irene Chen
Le Petit Chef
2
Contents
Le Petit Chef
Microwave Industry•Technology•Market•Recent Development of Microwave
Le Petit Product Line
Project Selection and Execution
Le Petit Market Development
Crisis and Dilemma
Solution
BACKGROUND OF MICROWAVE OVEN
INDUSTRY
Microwave Oven History
History 1940…
Radar(Radio detecting and ranging)
1946… Magnetron and Chocolate bar
1947… The first commercial product hit
the market 1952…
The first home microwave model, $1295
5 ½ feet tallOver 750 pounds$5000
5 ½ feet tallOver 750 pounds$5000
Technology of Microwave Oven
The Basic Techonology
Microwave oven uses various combinations of electrical circuits and mechanical devices to produce and control the output of microwave energy for heating and cooking.
Two fundamental sections: Control section High-voltage section
Technology ofMicrowave Oven
Cost structure of a microwave oven as % of total cost
Microwave cost structure
Raw Material 65%
Direct Labor 10%
Indirect Labor 6%
General Overhead & Depreciation
11%
Logistic & Stock Holding
5%
Development 3%
Total 100%
Module & Assembly Costs
Cavity 15%
Power Supply 25%
Microwave System(magnetron, wave-guide)
15%
Door 10%
Controls 10%
Final Assembly 10%
Other 15%
Total 100%
Cost of Grill, Crisp & Control*
40%
*Impact of providing an additional “grill” feature on the cost structure of a basic oven.
Over 40%
Scale-sensitiv
e
Scale-sensitiv
e
The level of sophistication of a microwave oven
Recent Developments
Combi-Ovens A combination of microwave and other cooking
modes to provide a variety of options. Steaming, browning and grilling
Accessories Allowed users to cook specific types of food
Intelligence Fuzzy logic
New control technique Improve the ease of use and performance of
microwave ovens
BACKGROUND OF LE PETIT CHEF
Introduction
Sales
Product Mix Turnover by geographic region
Strategy
Differentiated through Technical innovation Performance features
Combi-ovens Combined cooking modes of grilling and convection
heating with microwave cooking. Pull marketing strategy
Exclusive recipes Created a strong brand image
Innovation design and high performance Diversify into manufacturing other high-end
countertop appliance.
Operating structure
High conformance quality Reliable order deliveries Low costs Strong control over suppliers Heavy investment in R&D Inter-functional coordinate and cooperation
Organization Structure
Marketing
Manufacturing
Sales R&D
CEO
CFO
FinanceAdmin
PRODUCT LINE MAP
Liberte
25L
Liberte
25L
GrandeLiberte
35L
Compacte
Liberte20L
Liberte
Ultigril
25L
1990 1991199
2199
4199
3
1995 1996
2000
1999
1998199
7
Egalite
Deluxe
35L
Egalite
Deluxe
20LEgalit
e Delux
e25L
Egalite
Crousty
20L
Egalite
Crousty
35L
Egalite
Crousty
35L
Egalite
Grande
35L
Egalite Compa
cte20L
Egalite
25L
Egalite
25L
LiberteElectoniq
ue35L
Egalite Uno20L
Egalite Uno35L
Egalite Uno25L
LiberteElectoniq
ue20LLiberte
Electonique25L
LiberteUltigril
20L
LiberteUltigril
35L
UltigrilElectoniq
ue20LUltigril
Electonique25LUltigril
Electonique35L
LiberteRotesori
20L
LiberteItalia20L
LiberteItalia25L
LiberteRotesori
25L
LiberteItalia35L
LiberteRotesori
35L
PROJECT SELECTION & EXCUTION
Project Selection
Project Execution
Cross Functional Working Group
The project plan included the NPV Analysis, a project Charter, the Detailed sequence of project activities split into a number
of different phases separated by clear decision points for reviews by the head of other departments.
LE PETIT MARKET DEVELOPMENT
Recent Market Development
Low end mid range segment
Price Decline
The Crisis
Propose Microwave Oven
New Intelligent
Line of
Microwave
“Fuzzy
Logic”
Cost
Reducti
on of
Egalite
and
“Creat
e Low
end
Fratern
ite Line
New,
Original
design of
low cost,
Low end
Fraternite
line
Develop
“Liberte
Express
” quick
heating,
more
powerful
megatro
n
Add larger cavity to Liberte
line
306 personNPV
7,000,00018 months
72 PeopleNPV
20,000,00012 months
180 PeopleNPV
10,000,00018 months
24 PeopleNPV
15,500,0006 months
30 PeopleNPV
14,400,0006 months
On Going Project
Gagne’s Dilemma
Propose Project On going Project
Price and Visible Feature Differentiation are paramount in today’s market
Cost Reducing sound like to trim Mercedes-Benz down to make Fiat
Problem in Product Planning Activity Too many projects overall. Too many derivative projects( v.s Platform
project). Overcommitted resources. Inappropriate skill mix in R&D. Little top-down input to project generation
(the focus being on bottom-up suggestion). Dealing with potentially radical disruptive
technology trends.
Things to Consider
Solution
Solution …..
Opinion from our classmates Hai
Depend on the NPV, I may choose the highest one. But we still need to know more detail and information about the projects.
Silvia---The fourth and the second projects If we just consider about numbers, such as NPV, human resources and time to complete the project, I may choose the fourth
project. Depend on the strategy, considering about time limited. The company can choose the second project to create a new market.
Luz---The second project Because of NPV, people and time, the second is the best one. In another way, Asian market is another chance, because of
Asian people may think the brand from Europe is kind of luxury. It will be another chance to create low end market. Combine on going project for product design and product modification
Pipe---The fourth and the first projects The choices is base on the company strategy, if I could choose one of the project, then :
Short term strategy: The fourth project Long term strategy: The first project
Henky---The fourth project To think about why people use microwave oven, one important reason is they want to save time. So the performance is
important, project 4 enhance the speed of cooking. Marketing department always focus on low price, good quality, they can sale easily. R&D department want to create unique, high quality product. Focus in product design for the on going project.
Bodhi--- The first project NPV is just a prediction, it’s only project prediction. We can not just look at the NPV in deciding which project to go on. I rather
choose first project which is fuzzy logic as it is a new innovation in the market and this is very important for company which its operation based on the innovation to be able to compete in the market. It might give lower NPV but company can be a market leader for the technology
We can not stop the on going project and we have new project thus we can use heavy weight model to link each other project.
LE PETIT CHEF BY : MIP’S ANGEL
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
top related