case digest_mejoff v. director of prisons, 90 scra 71

Post on 17-Aug-2015

220 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Case Digest_Mejoff v. Director of Prisons, 90 SCRA 71

TRANSCRIPT

FACTS: Boris Mejoff, an alien of Russian descent, was brought to Philippines fro Shanghai, asa secret operati!e b" the #apanese forces during the #apanese regie$ %pon liberation, he wasarrested as a #apanese sp" b" %$S$ Ar" Counter &ntelligence Corps$ Then he was handed totheCoonwealth'o!ernent fordispositionin linewithCoonwealth Actno$ ()*$ThePeople+s Court ordered his releasebut the deportation board ta,ing his case found that Mejoffdid not ha!e tra!elling docuents and his sta" in the Philippines was illegal$ This was brought tothe iigration authorities$ After in!estigation the Board of Coissioners of &igration onApril-, ./0) declared Mejoff had entered Philippines illegall" in ./00 withoutinspection andadissionb"thetheiigrationofficials$ &t orderedthat hedeportedonthefirst a!ailabletransportation to Russia$ Mejoff was under custod" fro his arrest on March .), ./0)$ &n Ma"./0), Mejoff was transferred to Cebu Pro!incial #ail together with three Russians waiting for thearri!al of soe Russian !essels$ &n #ul" and August ./0) two Russian boats called Cebu Port$Their asters refused to ta,e Mejoff and his Russian copanions due to lac, of authorit" to doso$ &n 1ctober ./0) after repeated failures to ship this deportee abroad, authorities transferredhi to Bilibid Prison at Muntinlupa where he has been confined until ./0/$ This is also the beliefof Coissioner of &igration which will be the best interest of the countr"$ Mejoff contentedthat he a" not be deported because he was brought to the Philippines legall" b" the #apaneseforces$ Mejoff alsocontentedthat thestatutor"periodunder thelawshase2pired$ %nderSection 34 of the Philippine &igration Act of ./05 an" alien who enters this countr" 6withoutinspection and adission b" the iigration authorities at a designated point of entr"7 is subjectto deportation within fi!e "ears$ &n a of siilar litigation 6Boro!s," !s Coissioner of&igration7, there8uest for habeascorpuswasdeniedstating:9&t ust beadittedthatteporar" detention is a necessar" step in the process of e2clusion or e2pulsion of undesirablealiens and that pending arrangeents for his deportation, the 'o!ernent has the right to holdtheundesirablealienunder confineent for areasonablelenght of tie$ :owe!er, underestablished precedents, too long a detention a" justif" the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus$Theeaningof reasonabletiedependsoncircustancesli,edifficulties of obtainingapassport, a!ailabilit" of transportation, the diploatic arrangeent and efforts displa"ed to sendthe deportee$ &t is presued that the go!ernent is a,ing its efforts to carr" out the decree ofe2clusionb"thepresident consideringthedesireof thego!ernent toe2pel thealien$Thego!ernent is reall" tr"ing to e2pedite the e2pulsion of Mejoff$ 1n the other hand, the recordfails to show how long he has been confined since his apprehension$ Mejoff did not also indicatethe neglected opportunities to send hi abroad$ %nless it is shown that the deportee is beingindefinitel" iprisonedunder pretenseof awaitingachancefor deportationor unless thego!ernent adits that it cannot deport Mejoff or unless Mejoff is held for too longperiod, ourcourts will not interfere$ The difference of this case fro Boro!s,"+s is in the fact that the recordshowthispetitioner hasbeendetainedsinceMarch./0)$ &n%$S$ adela"of *5onthsincarr"ing out an order of deportation has not been held sufficient to justif" the issuance of the writof habeas corpus$ This petition is denied$&SS%;:

top related