cdt403 research methodology in natural sciences and engineering theory of science
Post on 12-Feb-2016
43 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1
CDT403 Research Methodology in Natural Sciences and Engineering
Theory of ScienceRESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, SOCIETY, WORLDVIEWS
COMPLEXITY AND INTERDISCIPLINARITY
Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
School of Innovation, Design and Engineering Mälardalen University
2
Theory of Science
Lecture 1 SCIENCE, KNOWLEDGE, TRUTH, MEANING. FORMAL LOGICAL SYSTEMS LIMITATIONS
Lecture 2 LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION. CRITICAL THINKING. PSEUDOSCIENCE - DEMARCATION
Lecture 3 RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, SOCIETAL ASPECTS. PROGRESS. HISTORY OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY. POSTMODERNISM . COMPLEXITY AND INTERDISCIPLINARITY
Lecture 4 GOLEM LECTURE. ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC CONFIRMATION: THEORY OF RELATIVITY, COLD FUSION, GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
Lecture 5 COMPUTING HISTORY OF IDEAS
Lecture 6 PROFESSIONAL & RESEARCH ETHICS
3
RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, SOCIETY, WORLDVIEWS
SCIENCE IN MICROCOSMOS AND IN MACROCOSMOS
SCIENCE, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY
SCIENCE, SOCIETY, ECONOMY – TRIPLE HELIX
SCIENCE, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, PROGRESS
HISTORY OF SCIENCE THEORY
SCIENCE WARS AND PEACECYBERNETICS AS A LANGUAGE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY
COMMUNICATIONTRANSDISCIPLINARY, INTERDISCIPLINARY AND CROSS
DISCIPLINARY RESEARCHAN EXAMPLE OF PARADIGM SHIFT IN SCIENCE: COPERNICAN
REVOLUTION
4
SCIENCE OBJECTS DOMINATING METHOD
Simple Reductionism (analysis)
Logic &Mathematics
Abstract objects:propositions, numbers, ... Deduction
Natural Sciences
Natural objects: physical bodies, fields and interactions, living
organisms ...
Hypothetico-deductive method
Social Sciences
Social objects:human individuals, groups, society, ..
Hypothetico-deductive method
+ Hermeneutics
Humanities
Cultural objects: human ideas, actions and
relationships, language, artefacts…
Hermeneutics
Complex Holism (synthesis)
SCIENCE IN MICRO AND MACROCOSMOSPhysical Sciences, Objects and Methods
5
CLASSICAL SCIENCES HAVE SPECIFIC AREAS OF VALIDITY
6
Different Levels of Organisation – The Structure of Matter
7
DNA - Deoxyribonucleic Acid
DNA is the primary chemical component of chromosomes and the material of which genes are made
8
DNA – BASE MOLECULE
9
MOLECULE - ATOM
10
ATOM – NUCLEUS - NUCLEON
11
ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FORCES
http://www.cpepweb.org/images/chart_2006_4.jpg
12
MODEL vs ”REALITY”
http://www.iumsc.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/demoselect.cgi
13
MODELS OF ORGANIC MOLECULES
14
Different Representations of the Same Molecule
http://www.iumsc.indiana.edu/graphics/jamm2.1.html
15
IMAGES
Fluorescence images of rhodamine B molecules obtained by Fluorescence Imaging and Spectroscopy of Single Molecules
Santa Cruz scientists have taken a detailed picture, using x-ray crystallography, of a complete ribosome, the small cellular component which translates genetic information into proteins.
http://www.aip.org/physnews/graphics/html/ribosome.html
16
ATOM
Images of ultracold rubidium atoms trapped in different configurations of laser beams. Left to right: dual 1-D traps, crossed 1-D traps, and 3-D lattice trap formed at trap intersections.
http://www.aip.org/mgr/png/Physics News Graphics
Model of atom
17
MODELLING
“REAL WORLD”
AS IT IS:
MODELED
PHENOMENA
SIMPLIFIED
MODEL
COMPARISON:
DOES IT WORK?
“REAL WORLD”
AS IT IS:
MODELED
PHENOMENA
SIMPLIFIED
MODEL
COMPARISON
DOES IT WORK?
“Real world” Model
Program Compiler Theory
Computer Hardware Computer Simulation
18
Rowley's original orrery, 1712. The orrery was made by John Rowley of London for Charles Boyle, fourth Earl of Orrery.
The instrument acquired its current name after it was popularized by 17th century essayist, Sir Richard Steele.
The solar system model showed the respective motions of the Earth and Moon around the Sun and was copied from an earlier example made by the famous clockmaker George Graham (1673-1713) for Prince Eugene of Savoy.
Science Museum London/ Science & Society Picture Library
MODEL & SIMULATION
19
SUN
20
SUN
21
Long-lasting sunspots appear in this sequence of drawings made by Galileo himself as he observed the Sun from June 2nd to 26th, 1612
SUN
22
The invention of gunpowder, c 14th century.
Allegorical interpretation of the invention of gunpowder, showing the devil on the shoulder of a monk involved in an experiment. It is thought that the artist intended the monk in the picture to be Berthold Schwarz, a semi-legendary German Franciscan monk.
Schwarz was a nickname (German for 'black') due to Berthold's chemical experiments. The picture is an alchemical engraving.
Science Museum London/ Science & Society Picture Library
SCIENCE VS TECHNOLOGY
23
TECHNOLOGY EXPANDS OUR WAYS OF THINKING ABOUT THINGS, EXPANDS OUR WAYS OF DOING THINGS.
Herbert A. Simon
24
Culture(Religion, Art, …)
CLASSICAL SCIENCES –LANGUAGE BASED SCHEME
Natural Sciences(Physics,
Chemistry,Biology, …)
Social Sciences(Economics,
Sociology,Anthropology, …)
The Humanities(Philosophy, History,
Linguistics …)
Logic &
Mathematics
Computing
25
SCIENCES BASED ON SEVERAL RESEARCH FIELDS
Our scheme represents classical sciences. Many modern sciences are stretching over several research fields
of our scheme. Computer science e.g. includes the field of AI that has its roots in
mathematical logic and mathematics but uses physics, chemistry and biology and even has parts where medicine and psychology are very important.
26
WHAT IS AFTER ALL THIS THING CALLED SCIENCE
The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Aristotle, Metaphysica
27
SCIENCE, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY Aristotle's Distinctions between Science and Technology
Science Technology
Object unchangeable changeable
Principle of motion inside outside
End knowing the general knowing the concrete
Activity theoria: end in itself poiesis: end external
Method abstraction modeling complexityProcess conceptualizing optimizing
Innovation form discovery inventionType of result law-like statements rule-like statements
Time perspective long-term short-term
28
SCIENCE, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
Science
Research
Development
Technology
29
SCIENCE AND SOCIETYTHE TRIPLE HELIX MODEL
CULTURE
SCIENCES & HUMANITIES
SOCIETY
Knowledge society based on ICT
The triple helix model: – ACADEMIC– INDUSTRY– GOVERMENT
30
SOCIETAL ASPECTS OF SCIENCE
Science has undoubtedly several important facets:
- insights in foundational issues, - applications - societal aspects.
Sciences are promoting rational and analytical discussions of central issues of concern to scientists and other scholars, and to the public at large both in terms of knowledge production and practical applications.
31
SOCIETAL ASPECTS OF SCIENCERESEARCH COMMUNITY AS INFORMATIONAL NETWORK
“ .. if we consider Galileo alone in his cell muttering, ‘and yet it moves,’ with the recent meeting at Kyoto – where heads of states, lobbyists, and scientists were assembled together in the same place to discuss the Earth – we measure the difference ..”
Bruno Latour
32
SOCIETAL ASPECTS OF SCIENCE
Further reading on current topics:http://www.sciencemag.org
Essays on Science and Society Science magazine
33
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (1) Logical Positivism
During much of this century, “positivism” has dominated discussions of the scientific method.
Positivism recognizes as valid only the knowledge based on experience.
34
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (2) Logical Positivism
1920s: Logical positivism (Vienna Circle), accepted as its central doctrine Wittgenstein’s verification theory of meaning that statements or propositions are meaningful only if they can be empirically verified.
This differentiate scientific (meaningful) statements from purely metaphysical (meaningless) statements.
35
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (3) Logical Empiricism
Carnap replaced the concept of verification with the idea of “gradually increasing confirmation”.
Universal statements could never be verified, but they may be “confirmed” by the accumulation of successful empirical tests.
Thus, science progresses through the accumulation of multiple confirming instances obtained under a wide variety of circumstances and conditions.
36
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (4) Logical Empiricism
Logical empiricists believe that all knowledge begins with observation. This leads to empirical generalizations among observable entities. As our ideas progress, theories are formulated deductively to explain the generalizations, and new evidence is required to confirm or disconfirm the theories. Throughout the process, data are given precedence.
The entire process is viewed as essentially inductive.
37
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (6) Popper and Falsificationism
Unlike positivists, Popper accepted the fact that “observation always presupposes the existence of some system of expectations”.
For Popper, the scientific process begins when observations clash with existing theories or preconceptions. To solve this scientific problem, a theory is proposed and the logical consequences of the theory (hypotheses) are subjected to rigorous empirical tests.
38
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (7) Popper and Falsificationism
The objective of testing is the refutation of the hypothesis. When a
theory’s predictions are falsified, it has to be ruthlessly rejected.
Those theories that survive falsification are said to be corroborated (= confirmed) and tentatively accepted.
39
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (8) Popper and Falsificationism
Thus the problem of induction is seemingly avoided by denying that science rests on inductive inference. Note nevertheless that Popper’s notion of corroboration itself depends on an inductive inference.
According to Popper’s falsificationism, science progresses by a
process of “conjectures and refutations”.
40
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (9) Popper and Falsificationism
The most severe problem with Popper’s version of the scientific method is that it is impossible to conclusively refute a theory because realistic test situations depend on much more than just the theory under investigation.
41
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (10) Kuhn’s Scientific Revolutions
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) was the one of most influential philosophers of science of the twentieth century. His The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is one of the most cited academic books.
His contribution to the philosophy of science meant not only a break with several positivist doctrines but also established a new style of philosophy of science directly related to the history of science.
42
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (10) Kuhn’s Scientific Revolutions
Kuhns account of the development of science held that science enjoys periods of stable growth interrupted by scientific revolutions, to which he added the controversial ‘incommensurability thesis’, that theories from differing periods suffer from certain deep kinds of failure of comparability. For Kuhn competing paradigms were incommensurable - they involved looking at the world in radically different ways.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
43
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (11) Kuhn’s Scientific Revolutions
In Kuhn’s view, the individual scientist’s decision to pursue a new paradigm must be made on faith in its “future promise”.
Science progresses through “paradigm shifts”, but there is no guarantee that it progresses toward anything - least of all toward “the truth”.
44
EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY (12) Kuhn’s Scientific Revolutions
In criticism of Kuhn, some writers have suggested alternative worldview models as for example “research tradition” concept, which attempts to restore rationality to theory selection by expanding the concept of rationality.
45
Paul Feyerabend: Anything Goes
Feyerabend, held that there was no such thing as the scientific method and saw science as an essentially anarchic enterprise in which ‘anything goes’.
It is true that there is no single method that marks out science from any other form of rational enquiry but nonetheless there are a range of criteria - such as explanatory scope, predictive power, experimental repeatability, consistency with other well-established theory - that make it a different sort of enterprise to, say, astrology or alchemy.
46
POSTMODERNISM
Postmodernism is an artistic, architectural, philosophical, and cultural movement which formed in reaction to modernism.
Modernism may be seen as the culmination of the Enlightenment's quest for an rational aesthetics, ethics, and knowledge, postmodernism is concerned with how the authority of those ideals, sometimes called metanarratives, are undermined through fragmentation, and deconstruction.
47
POSTMODERNISM
Jean-François Lyotard famously described postmodernism as an "incredulity toward metanarratives" (Lyotard, 1984).
Postmodernism attacks the notions of monolithic universals and encourages fractured, fluid and multiple perspectives and is marked by an increasing importance in the ideas from the Sociology of knowledge.
metanarratives - "grand narratives“, form of ‘universal truth'
48
POSTMODERNISM
All knowledge, scientific knowledge included, is held to be socially constructed.
Science is therefore merely one story among others. The world we know is one that is constructed by human discourses, giving us not so much truths as ‘truth-effects’ which may or may not be pragmatically useful.
From this point of view, epistemologically speaking, a scientific text is understood as being on a par with a literary text.
49
SCIENCE WARS (1)
In early 1996 the physicist Alan Sokal created a controversy by publishing two journal articles.
The first article, Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity appeared in the journal Social Text.
It pretended to be, and was taken by the editors of Social Text as, a serious article on the implications of developments in the field of cultural studies for developments in modern physics, and vice-versa.
50
SCIENCE WARS (2)
The second article, A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies, appeared in the journal Lingua Franca just as issue of Social Text containing the first article came out. It revealed that the first article was in fact a hoax.
51
SCIENCE WARS (3)
“But why did I do it? I confess that I'm an unabashed Old Leftist who never quite understood how deconstruction was supposed to help the working class. And I'm a stodgy old scientist who believes, naively, that there exists an external world, that there exist objective truths about that world, and that my job is to discover some of them. “
Allan Sokal
52
SCIENCE WARS (4)
“To test the prevailing intellectual standards, I decided to try a modest (though admittedly uncontrolled) experiment: Would a leading North American journal of cultural studies - whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross - publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions? “
Allan Sokal
53
SCIENCE WARS (5)
The post modern ideas were known as• Deconstructionism• Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK), • Social Constructivism, and they greatly influenced• Science and Technology Studies (STS).
The branch of sociology known as Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK) or Science and Technology Studies (STS), had the objective of showing that the results of scientific findings did not represent reality, but were basically the ideology of dominant groups within society.
54
Postmodernist Anti-Scientism
Post-modernism was a radical critique against science, contemporary philosophy and current understanding of rationality. The view of science as a search for truths (or approximate truths) about the world was rejected.
According to postmodernism, the natural world has a subordinated role in the construction of scientific knowledge.
Science was just another social practice, producing ``narrations'' and ``myths'' with basically no more validity than myths.
55
IS THERE ANYTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN? ANY PROGRESS?
56
An Example of Progress - Transports
57
An Example of Progress - Transports
Beam me up Scotty next?
58
SCIENCE WARS (6)
http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/
A report from the front of the ``Science Wars'' The controversy over the book Higher Superstition, by Gross and Levitt http://www.math.gatech.edu/~harrell/cult.html
http://skepdic.com/sokal.html
59
SCIENCE WARS AND PEACE
Cross-disciplinary, multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary collaboration.
Examples: Computing and Philosophyhttp://ia-cap.org/http://www.interdisciplines.org Interdisciplines (Topics:
Adaptation and Representation, Art and Cognition, Causality, Enaction (Action and perception intertwined), Issues in Coevolution of Language and Theory of Mind,
60
Knowledge Era and Skepticism
Again it is almost like in Renaissance, people can claim “Ad fontes” ! To the sources, that is. We do not need to accept a second opinion, we can now try to get a thousand instead , and one can be formidably well informed as a patient.
Bodil Jönsson, Think if it is just the opposite!? (Tänk om
det är precis tvärtom!?)
61
Cybernetics as a Language for Interdisciplinary Communication
Stuart A. UmplebyThe George Washington University
Washington, DCwww.gwu.edu/~umpleby
62
How is interdisciplinary communication possible?
• We would need to share a common language
• Perhaps there is a common “deep structure” which is hidden by our more specialized discipline-oriented terms and theories
Stuart A. Umpleby
63
Common processes in the external world
• General systems theory, particularly James G. Miller’s living systems theory, claims that there are certain functions that a living system must perform
• Miller suggested that “living systems” exist at seven levels: - cell, - organ, - organism, - group, - organization, - nation, - supranational organization
Stuart A. Umpleby
64
3. Basic Concepts
In cybernetics there are three fundamental concepts:
Regulation Self-organization
Reflexivity
Stuart A. Umpleby
65
Regulation
• Two analytic elements – regulator and system being regulated• Engineering examples – thermostat and heater, automatic pilot
and airplane• Biological examples – feeling of hunger and food in stomach,
light in eye and iris opening• Social system examples – manager and organization, therapist
and patient
Stuart A. Umpleby
66
The law of requisite variety
• Information and selection– “The amount of selection that can be performed is limited by
the amount of information available”
• Regulator and regulated– “The variety in a regulator must be equal to or greater than
the variety in the system being regulated”W. Ross Ashby
Stuart A. Umpleby
67
Coping with Complexity
When faced with a complex situation, there are two choices
1. Increase the variety in the regulator: hire staff or subcontract
2. Reduce the variety in the system being regulated: reduce the variety one chooses to control
Stuart A. Umpleby
68
The Management of Complexity
• There has been a lot of discussion of complexity, as if it exists in the world
• Cyberneticians prefer to speak about “the management of complexity”
• Their view is that complexity is observer dependent, that the system to be regulated is defined by the observer
• This point of view greatly expands the range of alternatives
Stuart A. Umpleby
69
Self-organization
• Every isolated, determinate, dynamic system obeying unchanging laws will develop organisms adapted to their environments. W. Ross Ashby
• Many elements within the system• Boundary conditions – open to energy (hence dynamic), – closed to information (interaction rules do not change during the
period of observation)
http://www-lih.univ-lehavre.fr/~bertelle/cossombook/cossombook.html Complex Systems and Self-organization Modelling
After Stuart A. Umpleby
70
Self-organization
71
Examples of self-organization
• Physical example – chemical reactions; iron ore, coke, and oxygen heated in a blast furnace will change into steel, carbon dioxide, water vapor and slag
• Biological examples – food in the stomach is transformed into usable energy and materials, species compete to yield animals adapted to their environments
After Stuart A. Umpleby
72
Digital Video Feedback and Morphogenesis
Video Feedback systems tend toward either stability or chaos. While the stable attractor offers some interest in the subtleties of its decay, the unstable attractor offers an unlimited supply of endless evolving motifs and an emergent behaviour.
The system can be get into chaotic emergence via camera movement (rotation and positioning). The important thing was to catch the movement of ‘catching a shape’ in a particular temporal phase to feed back into the system advancing the complexity and initiating lifelike morphogenesis.
http://www.transphormetic.com/Talysis01.htm
73
Physical biology of molecular motors involved in intracellular self-organization
Network of microtubules and two kinds of motor proteins created by self-organisation in vitro
Motor proteins are key determinants for the spatial organisation of eukaryotic cells. They are thermodynamic non-equilibrium machines playing a crucial role for the dynamic nature of cellular order. In fact, they provide a paradigm for the concept of intracellular order depending on molecular dynamics. How exactly the collective behaviour of various motors with different kinetic properties drives the organisation of the cytoskeleton is not understood.
http://www-db.embl.de/jss/EmblGroupsOrg/g_175.html
74
Self-Organizing Systems Resources
http://www.calresco.org/links.htm
75
Introduction to Complex Systemsby David Kirshbaum
Four Important Characteristics of Complexity: • Self-Organization • Non-Linearity • Order/Chaos Dynamic • Emergent Properties
Computer Programming approaches used for demonstrating, simulating, and analyzing these characteristics of Complex Systems:
• Artificial Life • Genetic Algorithms • Neural Networks • Cellular Automata • Boolean Networks
http://www.calresco.org/links.htm
76
Examples of self-organization
Large-scale lattice Boltzmann simulations of complex fluids: advances through the advent of computational grids
Institute for Computational Physics. Physics on High Performance Computershttp://www.ica1.uni-stuttgart.de/publications/2005/HCVC05/
77
Structure and dynamics of animal social networks
Interactions between agents (whatever they may be) can be represented by a network. In animal social systems the nodes represent individual animals and the lines between them social ties.
There is a growing interest, among mathematicians, statistical physicists, sociologists and others in understanding and characterizing the structure of such networks, and the dynamics of processes (such as the transmission of disease or other "information") on networks.
Most of the animal social networks constructed so far are built via an accumulation of many surveys of the population. An alternative approach is to monitor interactions in real time, to try to understand not only how information might be transmitted through a network, but also how the nature of the information might be having an effect on the structure of the network.
http://people.bath.ac.uk/pysrj/
78
Supramolecular chemistry and self-assembling molecules
Supramolecular chemists are now extending their research beyond the design of molecules that can be used for molecular recognition or catalysis.
They are actively exploring systems that undergo self-organisation - systems that can spontaneously generate well-defined functional supramolecular architectures by self-assembly from their components.
This spontaneous but controlled formation of nanoscale architectures could be used to engineer and process functional nanostructures, offering a powerful alternative to nanofabrication, going from construction to self-construction.
Molecular fragments self-assemble to form a dynamic library of
potentially bioactive compounds
"Self-organisation by selection takes advantage of dynamic diversity to allow variation in response to internal or external factors in a Darwinian fashion."
"Constitutional dynamic chemistry paves the way towards an adaptive and evolutive chemistry, a further step towards unravelling the science
of complex matter." http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/ChemScience/Volume/2007/02/A_natural_selection.asp
79
Self-referenceReflexivity
http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/guarana/docs/design-html/node2.html Computational Reflection
80
Douglas Hofstadter on Self-Reference“Self-reference is ubiquitous. It happens every time any one
says “I” or “me” or “word” or “speak” or “mouth”. It happens every time a newspaper prints a story about reporters, every time someone writes a book about writing, designs a book about book design, makes a movie about movies, or writes an article about self-reference. Many systems have the capability to represent or refer to themselves somehow, to designate themselves (or elements of themselves) within the system of their own symbolism. Whenever this happens, it is an instance of self-reference.”
“My proposal [...] is to see the “I” as a hallucination perceived by a hallucination, which sounds pretty strange, or perhaps even stranger: the “I” as a hallucination hallucinated by a hallucination.”(I Am a Strange Loop, p. 293 )
81
Self-reference (Reflexivity)
• This model has traditionally been avoided and is logically difficult
• Inherent in social systems where observers are also participants, in individual living organisms
• Every statement reveals an observer as much as what is observed
After Stuart A. Umpleby
82
Examples of reflexivity – recursive algorithms
This graph is based on a simple recursive algorithm. Recursion is a popular technique used to describe trees and the like, because of the self-referential nature of a tree.
Self-reference can lead to undecidability (and paradoxes like set of all sets that are not members of themselves)
83
Observation
Self-awareness
Stuart A. Umpleby
84
Reflexivity in a social system
Stuart A. Umpleby
85
Ideas
Variables Groups
Events
A reflexive theory operates at two levels
Stuart A. Umpleby
86
Adaptation/Reactivity/Regulation, Self-organization, Self-reference/Reflexivity/Recursiveness
Models of regulation, self-organization, and reflexivity – can be used in two ways, to:
• develop descriptions of some system (develop interdisciplinary models), or
• guide efforts to influence some system
Stuart A. Umpleby
87
Overview of Cybernetics
• The focus of attention within cybernetics has changed from engineering to the biology of cognition to social systems
• Ideas from cybernetics have been used in computer science, robotics, management, family therapy, philosophy of science, economics and political science
• Cybernetics has created theories of the nature of information, knowledge, adaptation, learning, self-organization, cognition, autonomy, and understanding
Stuart A. Umpleby
88
Author First Order Cybernetics Second Order Cybernetics
Von Foerster PaskVarelaUmpleby Umpleby
The cybernetics of observed
systemsThe purpose of a modelControlled systemsInteraction among the variables in
a systemTheories of social systems
The cybernetics of observing systemsThe purpose of a modelerAutonomous systemsInteraction between observer and observedTheories of the interaction between ideas
and society
Definitions of First and Second Order Cybernetics
Stuart A. Umpleby
89Three Versions of Cybernetics
By transforming conceptual systems (through persuasion, not coercion), we can change society
If people accept constructivism, they will be more tolerant
Scientific knowledge can be used to modify natural processes to benefit people
An important consequence
Ideas are accepted if they serve the observer’s purposes as a social participant
Ideas about knowledge should be rooted in neurophysiology.
Natural processes can be explained by scientific theories
A key assumption
How people create, maintain, and change social systems through language and ideas
How an individual constructs a “reality”
How the world worksWhat must be explained
Explain the relationship between the natural and the social sciences
Include the observer within the domain of science
Construct theories which explain observed phenomena
The puzzle to be solved
The biology of cognition vs. the observer as a social participant
Realism vs. ConstructivismReality vs. scientific theories
A key distinction
A pragmatic view of epistemology: knowledge is constructed to achieve human purposes
A biological view of epistemology: how the brain functions
A realist view of epistemology: knowledge is a “picture” of reality
The view of epistemology
Social CyberneticsBiological CyberneticsEngineering Cybernetics
Stuart A. Umpleby
90
The Cybernetics of Science
NORMAL SCIENCE
SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
Stuart A. Umpleby
Incommensurabledefinitions
Correspondence principle
91
The Correspondence Principle
• Proposed by Niels Bohr when developing the quantum theory• Any new theory should reduce to the old theory to which it
corresponds for those cases in which the old theory is known to hold
• A new dimension is required
Stuart A. Umpleby
92
New philosophy of science
An Application of the Correspondence Principle
Old philosophy of science
Amount of attention paid to the observer
Stuart A. Umpleby
93
TRANSDISCIPLINARY, INTERDISCIPLINARY AND CROSS DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Modern sciences are stretching through several classical fields. Computer science e.g. includes the field of AI that has its roots in
mathematical logic and mathematics but uses physics, chemistry and biology and even has parts where medicine and psychology are very important.
Examples: Environmental studies, Cognitive sciences, Cultural studies, Policy sciences, Information sciences, Women’s studies, Molecular biology, Philosophy of Computing and Information, Bioinformatics, adaptive systems, intelligence, consciousness, societies of minds, ..
94
TRANSDISCIPLINARY, INTERDISCIPLINARY AND CROSS DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Research into complex phenomena has led to an insight that research problems have many different facets which may be approached differently at different levels of abstraction and that every knowledge field has a specific domain of validity.
This new understanding of a multidimensional many-layered knowledge space of phenomena have among others resulted in an ecumenical conclusion of science wars by recognition of the necessity of an inclusive and complex knowledge architecture which recognizes importance of a variety of approaches and types of knowledge.
95
TRANSDISCIPLINARY, INTERDISCIPLINARY AND CROSS DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Based on sources in philosophy, sociology, complexity theory, systems theory, cognitive science, evolutionary biology and fuzzy logic, Smith and Jenks present a new interdisciplinary perspective on the self-organizing complex structures.
They analyze the relationship between the process of self-organization and its environment/ecology. Two central factors are the role of information in the formation of complex structure and the development of topologies of possible outcome spaces.
96
TRANSDISCIPLINARY, INTERDISCIPLINARY AND CROSS DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
The authors argue for a continuous development from emergent complex orders in physical systems to cognitive capacity of living organisms to complex structures of human thought and to cultures.
This is a new understanding of unity of interdisciplinary knowledge, unity in structured diversity, also found in (Mainzer).
“Cosmic evolution leads from symmetry to complexity by symmetry breaking and phase transitions. The emergence of new order and structure in nature and society is explained by physical, chemical, biological, social and economic self-organization, according to the laws of nonlinear dynamics.
All these dynamical systems are considered computational systems processing information and entropy.”
97
“Are symmetry and complexity only useful models of science or are they universals of reality? Symmetry and Complexity discusses the fascinating insights gained from natural, social and computer sciences, philosophy and the arts.
With many diagrams and pictures, this book illustrates the spirit and beauty of nonlinear science. In the complex world of globalization, it strongly argues for unity in diversity.”
98
99
Preface ix
Part I The Simple and the Complex
1 Prologue: An Encounter in the Jungle 3
2 Early Light 11
3 Information and Crude Complexity 23
4 Randomness 43
5 A Child Learning a Language 51
6 Bacteria Developing Drug Resistance 63
7 The Scientific Enterprise 75
8 The Power of Theory 89
9 What Is Fundamental? 107
100
Part II The Quantum Universe
10 Simplicity and Randomness in the Quantum Universe 123
11
A Contemporary View of Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Mechanics and the Classical Approximation
135
12 Quantum Mechanics and Flapdoodle 167
13 Quarks and All That: The Standard Model 177
14 Superstring Theory: Unification at Last? 199
15 Time's Arrows: Forward and Backward Time 215
101
Part III Selection and Fitness
16 Selection at Work in Biological Evolution and Elsewhere 235
17 From Learning to Creative Thinking 261
18 Superstition and Skepticism 275
19 Adaptive and Maladaptive Schemata 291
20 Machines That Learn or Simulate Learning 307
Part IV Diversity and Sustainability
21 Diversities Under Threat 329
22 Transitions to a More Sustainable World 345
23 Afterword 367
Index 377
102
SCIENTIFIC METHOD CASE STUDY: THE COPERNICAN REVOLUTION
– Paradigm shift from medieval astronomy to modern science
– Plato has defined five perfect solids corresponding to five elements.
– In Aristotle’s physics each element had a natural place in the universe.
103
SCIENTIFIC METHOD CASE STUDY: THE COPERNICAN REVOLUTION
The natural place for the Earth was in the center of the universe; for Water on the surface of the Earth, for Air in the region above the surface of the Earth, and for the Fire above the atmosphere.
tetrahedron = plasma ("fire") octahedron = gas ("air") icosahedron = liquid ("water") hexahedron = solid ("earth") dodecahedron = the fifth element, (the quintessence)
The five Platonic solids
104
ARISTOTELIAN WORLD VIEW (1)
Each earthly object would have a natural place in the sub-lunar region depending on the proportion of four elements.
All objects on Earth were thought to have natural property to move in strait lines upwards or downwards, towards their natural place.
Thus stones have the natural motion straight downwards, towards the center of the earth, and flames have a natural motion straight upwards, striving towards the top of the atmosphere.
105
ARISTOTELIAN WORLD VIEW (2)
All motion other than natural motion requires a force.
In the second century AD Ptolemy developed within the Aristotelian physics a geocentric astronomical system that specified the orbits of the moon, the sun and all the planets. Ptolemy’s system was held as definite truth during the Antique and Middle Ages.
106
PTOLEMY’S SYSTEM
107
COPERNICAN SYSTEM
Figure 2 Copernican system
108
Copernicus (1483-1543) had no alternative for Aristotelian physics, and hence had no strong enough arguments to defend his heliocentric system. Copernicus model was against Aristotelian ideas of earth as natural center of the universe.
THE COPERNICAN TURN
109
PROBLEMS WITH THE COPERNICAN SYSTEM (1)
• Tower argument (the stone dropped from the top of a tower strikes the ground at the base of the tower, contrary to the hypothesis that the earth is spinning around its axes).
• Loose objects on the surface of the earth would be expected to flung from the earth surface in much the same ways stones would be flung from the rotating wheel.
• Absence of parallax in the observed positions of the stars
110
• Mars and Venus, as viewed by the naked eye, do not change size appreciably during the course of the year.
• If the earth were moving through the universe one would expect wind blowing all the time…
• How to explain that the moon follows the earth on its journey through the universe?
PROBLEMS WITH THE COPERNICAN SYSTEM (2)
111
GALILEO (1)
The new Galileo’s (1564 -1642) mechanics helped to defend Copernican system.
An object held at the top of a tower and sharing its circular motion
around the center of the earth will continue that motion (because of inertia) along with tower, after it is dropped and will strike the ground at the foot of the tower.
112
GALILEO (2)
Galileo proposed the following experiment to show the correctness of the law of inertia. If we drop a stone from the mast of a uniformly moving ship on the sea, the stone will strike the deck at the foot of the mast!
Galileo also used telescope to observe celestial bodies. The
discovery of the phases of Venus was another Galileo’s contribution to a success of Copernican theory.
113
KEPLER (1)
The next major support for Copernicus heliocentric scheme was from Kepler (1571-1630).
Kepler discovered the following three (Kepler!) laws of planetary motion.
Keplers’s first law
LAW 1: The orbit of a planet/comet about the sun is an ellipse with the sun's center of mass at one focus. (That eliminated ad-hoc epicycles from Copernican model).
114
KEPLER (2)
LAW 2: Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal intervals of time
Keplers’s second law
LAW 3: The squares of the periods of the planets are proportional to the cubes of their semi major axes: Ta2 / Tb2 = Ra3 / Rb3
115
NEWTON
Utilizing Kepler’s third law, Newton derived the law of gravitation.
Gravitational force is directly proportional to masses and inversely proportional to the square of their distance.
Constant G is called gravitational constant.
116
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS HISTORICAL EXAMPLE? (1)
We can conclude that neither inductivists (who claim that laws are "induced" from sets of data) nor falsificationists (who claim that one counter-example can prove theory wrong) can give a satisfactory explanation of Copernican revolution.
The Copernican revolution did not take place as a result of a new
theory supported by experimental confirmation.
117
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS HISTORICAL EXAMPLE? (2)
New physical concepts of force, inertia and action on distance did not come in the first place as a result of observation and experiment.
118
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS HISTORICAL EXAMPLE? (3)
Early formulations of the new theory, involving vaguely formulated novel conceptions, were preserved in spite of apparent falsifications!
It was only due to the intellectual effort of a number of scientists
developing new physics during several centuries, that the new theory could be satisfactorily justified.
119
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS HISTORICAL EXAMPLE? (4)
Galileo Galilei devised new mechanic to replace Aristotelian and so remove arguments against Copernicus.
He distinguished between the ideas of velocity and acceleration (change of velocity), and asserted that freely falling objects move with a constant acceleration that is independent of their weight.
120
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS HISTORICAL EXAMPLE? (5)
Galileo denied the Aristotelian claim that all motion requires a force and instead proposed circular law of inertia:
A moving body subject to no force will move indefinitely in a circle around the sun at uniform speed.
This law of inertia is later on replaced by Newton’s law of inertia.
121
AND AN ILLUSION AT THE END!
top related