ce58 023 prt eis seminar tyre modelling 1vf-no...
Post on 14-Oct-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Title: CE58_023_PRT_EIS_Seminar_Tyre_Modelling_1v1
Record Owner: JPRINS
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Record Type: TRANSIENT
Template Last Modified: 10/01/2018
Template Effective Date: 10/01/2018
2
TYRE MODELLING IN JAGUAR LAND ROVER
Jan PrinsTechnical Specialist Tyre Modelling & CAEChassis Steering Wheel & Tyres22/11/18
©2018
Marco Furlan TasaraProject Engineer Tyre Modelling & CAE
3
Objective
Provide an overview of and introduction to:
• Vehicle Development and CAE
• Testing of tyres for purpose of modelling
• Modelling of tyres
• Challenges and Vision
4
Objective
Provide an overview of and introduction to:
• Vehicle Development and CAE
• Testing of tyres for purpose of modelling
• Modelling of tyres
• Challenges and Vision
5
Vehicle DevelopmentPhysical versus Virtual Testing
Physical Testing
• Prototype vehicles (unique)
− ≈ £250,000 each
− ≈ 6 month lead time
• Ship vehicle to test site
− ≈ £15,000 (airfreight)
− ≈ 10 days each way
• Travel costs
− ≈ £1500 per ticket
• Poor repeatability and reproducibility
(changeable conditions and inconsistencies
between engineers)
Virtual Testing (CAE)
• Software (universal) licence costs (purchase
≈ £20,000 each & annual maintenance ≈
30%)
• All tests can be done anywhere at any time
• Some tests can be automated
• Extremely good repeatability and
reproducibility
• Accuracy of results depend on quality of
models and ability to simulate real world
6
Virtual EngineeringJaguar Land Rover ‘2020 Vision’
‘More Great Products Faster’ (to market):
By the year 2020 …
There will be ‘virtual test’ (=Computer Aided Engineering =CAE) capability to match each
and every physical test
Vehicle development and attribute balancing will be done ‘virtually’
All vehicle requirements will be signed off ‘virtually’ (at FDJ)
‘Virtual capability’ will be such that …
The first prototype vehicles built will be within ‘tuneable range’ of final target (i.e. within 5% of
target)
Prototype vehicles will only be used for fine tuning and validation of ‘virtual’ predictions
7
1. Models from testing tyres (‘business as usual’)
2. CAE Driven Tyre Development (‘Virtual Submissions’)
Both work streams are being advanced in parallel in line with agreed strategy
There is overlap between streams 1 and 2, and current practices are converging towards
‘CAE Driven Tyre Development’ and ‘Virtual Submissions’ capabilities
• Timing
• Tyres (logistics)
• Testing
• Parameterisation
• Collaboration
• Requirement definition
• Jaguar Land Rover ↔ Tyre OEM
interaction
Jaguar Land Rover Tyre Modelling Work Streams
8
Facilitate realisation of Jaguar Land Rover ‘2020 Vision’ for Virtual Capability
Provide dynamic tyre, rim and surface friction models to allow FDJ sign off through virtual testing only, eliminating any need for whole vehicle physical testing, other than for validation
ALL whole vehicle dynamic simulations needs tyre models. Tyre models are critical to the design process!
Tyre models are enabler for virtual development for nearly all CAE areas:
Pre-development and sign-off using CAE
Reducing prototypes, reducing physical testing, and overall reducing development time
DNA
Vehicle Development and CAE ‘Mission Statement’
9
Objective
Provide an overview of and introduction to:
• Vehicle Development and CAE
• Testing of tyres for purpose of modelling
• Modelling of tyres
• Challenges and Vision
10
Tyre modelling processes
We want to design / optimise a tyre in CAE, then make it (‘print at tyre’)
Until then all tyre models require test data to create models from the data
Jaguar Land Rover sources its own data / models
• Ensures comparable results
• Economies of scale
Current Process Desired Process
11
Flat track testing
Cons
• Artificial surface (sand paper) not representative of real road surface
• Capability for cleat testing t.b.c.
Pros
• Repeatability
• Flat surface © Calspan Inc.
12
Drum testing
External Drum
Internal Drum
Image KIT
Cons
• Curved contact patch
• Artificial surface (sand paper) not representative of real road surface (external drum)
Pros
• Cleat test capability
• Realistic road surface (internal drum)
Image FKA
13
Cons
• Real world surface variability (weather etc.)
• (Currently) requires large open space (VDA)
• Test repeatability
• Difficult to minimise unwanted ‘transient’ behaviour
Vehicle based objective tyre testing (VBOTT)
Dedicated vehicle fully instrumented with wheel force transducers and other instrumentation to gather tyre data at the wheel hub. This project is industry leading!
Pros
• Real world surface (any that can take car)
• Testing 4 tyres at once
• Fully inhouse
• A ‘self-propelled’ tyre test rig (fully instrumented LR vehicle)
for use on real world surfaces
• World’s most advanced project using on-vehicle data
acquisition!
• Measures tyre forces and moments on any real world surface (dry/wet asphalt, snow/ice, grass, etc.)
• Overall model costs comparable to Calspan
14
Vehicle Based Objective Tyre Testing (VBOTT)
Sample Results:
Benefits:
• Better correlation; CAE community needs tyre models for real world surfaces, in all sizes
• More realistic driving feel in the Jaguar Land Rover simulator
Way Forward:
• Routine VBOTT model delivery (~20 models in ‘18), based on current vehicle rigs
• Commission and deploy bespoke VBOTT vehicle rig (2nd half of ‘19)
15
Objective
Provide an overview of and introduction to:
• Vehicle Development and CAE
• Testing of tyres for purpose of modelling
• Modelling of tyres
• Challenges and Vision
16
All tyre models try and predict the behaviour of a tyre through calculations based on inputs from the vehicle model and give outputs to the vehicle model:
Inputs to the tyre model:
• Vertical load
• Camber
• Slip Angle
• Slip Ratio
• Speed (rotational)
• Inflation Pressure
• Temperature(s)
Outputs from the tyre model:
• Forces & Moments
• Longitudinal (X)
• Lateral (Y)
• Vertical (Z)
• Inflation Pressure
• Temperature(s)Not included in
all tyre models
Tyre model calculation from inputs to outputs
17
Tyre models used currently by Jaguar Land Rover
Magic Formula (MF) used for ‘handling’ (mainly horizontal plane)
Developed by Prof. Hans Pacejka (Delft, Netherlands), circa ‘90
FTire for ride & durability/loads (mainly vertical plane)
Developed by Prof. Michael Gipser (Munich, Germany), circa ‘98
Alternative / additional models are being tried (subject to strategic review / benchmark), in particular enhancements of MF (‘+ thermal’) and CDTire from Fraunhofer ITWM (i.l.o. FTire).
Image TUD
Image Cosin
18
Lateral force (Fy) vs Slip Angle (SA)
Tyre (265/45R21 104 Y) versus data from Calspan flat track
Actual MF example graphs
Pros
• Relatively cheap to produce (£5k)
• Open source (public model)
• Fast computation
• Limited ‘synthesising’ possible
Cons
• Limitations with regards to high frequency transients (e.g. ABS)
• No thermal effects included (in basic form)
• Only for longitudinal and lateral behaviour, not good for vertical
19
With scaling factors, the effect of changing friction coefficient, cornering stiffness, camber stiffness, etc, can be quickly investigated in a qualitative way.
Magic Formula scaling factors
20
FTire
FTire (Flexible ring Tire) models the tyre as a coarse surface mesh, dividing the surface of the tyre into great many square cells, attached to each other by very many spring-dampers.
Model ‘fitting’ principle is same as for MF (in a range of conditions vary model parameters until model output matches measurements).
Models are purchased externally together with the test data used to produce them.
Pros
• Good for ride comfort and durability application (loads)
• Deals well with transient (changing) conditions
• Useful animations
• Option to approximate wheel rim effects (‘Flexrim’)
Cons
• Expensive (~2x as much as MF, which is needed as base)
• Long computation time
• Not suitable for handling and lateral characteristics
• Difficult to ‘synthesise’ modelsImage Cosin
21Low Complexity
High Complexity
Mag
ic F
orm
ula
FTire / CDTire
Misuse
Low Slip Handling
Primary Ride
Handling on
‘Real’ Surface
Handling on Rough
Road
ABS Stop
Transient Steering
Hot/Cold Weather
Secondary Ride
Lap Time Simulation
Limited SCS Tune
Parking
Power on Oversteer
Extreme Manoeuvres
Capability Gap
Handling Ride / Loads
NVH
Off-Road
Rolling Resitance
‘Other’ Attributes
Capability Gap
Tyre ModellingStrategic Vision
22
Objective
Provide an overview of and introduction to:
• Vehicle Development and CAE
• Testing of tyres for purpose of modelling
• Modelling of tyres
• Challenges and Vision
23
MFeval Toolbox
• In-house Magic Formula coded in MATLAB and Simulink
• C-code compatible
• STI and CPI interfaces for MBS integration
• Baseline for future enhancements:
• Thermal
• Friction
• Parking
• Advance transients
• Wear
• Basic MF6.1 formulation is free and open source:
https://mfeval.wordpress.com/
24
Friction Research and Modelling
Why:
• We need tyre models for real surfaces, in order to improve
correlation with physical test
• If we can model friction then can test on one surface (sand
paper) and convert model to be representative of real surface
(e.g. asphalt)
What:
• VBOTT work ongoing on asphalt and snow/ice
• Self funded PhD Marco Furlan (started Feb. ’17)
• Jaguar Land Rover Chassis funded EngD Alex O’Neill
(started Oct. ‘17)
• Jaguar Land Rover VE funded PhD Gian-Matteo Bianchi
(started ‘15)
25
Jaguar Land Rover Tyre Modelling – Conclusions
• The Jaguar Land Rover Tyre CAE Team is putting a lot of effort into understanding the
tyre/road runway interaction:
• Vehicle based objective testing (VBOTT) on asphalt (and other surfaces)
• Research (multiple PhDs sponsored and/or supported)
• The ultimate aim is being able to test on a rig using a known repeatable surface (i.e.
sandpaper) and then convert data/models to be applicable to real world surfaces (e.g.
dry asphalt, etc.).
• This will enable Jaguar Land Rover’s Tyre Modelling and CAE capabilities to be
advanced, facilitating increased virtual development capabilities, to deliver even better
vehicles in ever shorter times.
26Questions …
27
Jaguar Land RoverW/1/26 Abbey Road, WhitleyCoventry CV3 4LF, UK
jaguarlandrover.com
THANK YOU Jan PrinsTechnical SpecialistM +44(0)7771 965252
jprins@jaguarlandrover.com
Presented on behalf of the Jaguar Land Rover Tyre CAE Team;
Javier Garcia, Marco Furlan, Carlos Rayo, Jorge Guitierrez
Mateo Gladstone, Tako Houtzager & Gian-Matteo Bianchi
TyreCAE@jaguarlandrover.com
The many people supporting us at Jaguar Land Rover
The Teams at Calspan, Cosin, FKA, Fraunhofer ITWM, Mathworks, OptimumG, Sova Motion, Stackpole Engineering and many more.
Dr. Dan O’Boy, Dr. Georgios Mavros, (Loughborough University)
Prof. John Watts, Dr. Patrick Gruber, Alex O’Neill (Surrey University)
Prof. Mike Blundell, Dr. Gary Wood (Coventry University)
To name but a few..!
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
top related