collaborative task assignment on tabletop computer
Post on 13-Dec-2014
534 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
[]chayan debNew Media Design2010-12
hci researchBangaloreMarch-July 2012
today’s roadmap
Project Initiation, Research,Design Development
Prototype
Connecting the dots
Conclusion
motivation
1. Multi-Touch Table from locally sourced materials
2. Interactive Installation using Gesture Recognition
project brief
Study and understand the emerging field of Natural User Interfaces and design interactions for probable application for industrial / enterprise users.
Understanding NUI Problem Finding
Tabletop Computers “The Computer is Personal”
directionTabletop Computers
Commercially Available Lesser Explored
EducationEntertainment
Hospitality
Multi-touch capabilityLarge screen real estate
Collaborative workOffice Environment
Table-like form factorObject Recognition
CSCW
FtF / CMCommunication
research plan
Precedent StudiesSecondary Research
Interviews
Research Reflections
Research Question
research question
1. Explore properties of Tabletop Computer to know which property can be leveraged upon maximum in an office scenario.
2. In what office scenarios face-to-face collaboration is absolutely necessary? What properties of face-to-face communication make them so?
precedent studies
1. Commercial Tabletop Computer applications: Sonicspree, The Real Estate Agent
2. Commercial Project Management packages: Microsoft Project
secondary research1. Types of tables in collaboration
Tables with different sizes have different purpose:
Meeting TableCollaboration Table
Ambient Table
secondary research1. Types of tables in collaboration2. Traditional tabletop work practices
Turn-takingOrientation of items
Personal & Private Space
secondary research1. Types of tables in collaboration2. Traditional tabletop work practices3. Evolution of Tabletop Computers
1992-Now
From lab prototypes to real-world applications From single-touch to multi-touch and tangibility
From projection to direct-display technology
secondary research1. Types of tables in collaboration2. Traditional tabletop work practices3. Evolution of Tabletop Computers4. Computer-mediated communication vs.
Face-to-face communication
Reaching consensusPerception of Task
Perception of colleagueIntent of colleague
interviewproject management becomes a way of life
among the more conventional project management tasks...I think the ones which involve collaboration are the ones which are most challenging
almost all collaborative activities at some point or other involve face-to-face collaboration
social factors comeinto play
sense of seriousness
if someone means what he or she is saying
virtual is virtual
many tasks are inter-related and there are lot of dependencies
it ultimately comes down to a meeting !
my point is that if task assignment anyways, happens in the face-to-face meeting...then what is the point iterating it over the network .
research reflection
Multi-touch capabilityLarge screen real estateTable-like form factor
Object Recognition
1. Explore properties of Tabletop Computer to know which property can be leveraged upon maximum in an office scenario.
research reflection
FtF communication is required in places which require discussion and planning.
FtF is effective in disseminating task related information and in reaching
consensus.
2. In what office scenarios face-to-face collaboration is absolutely necessary? What properties of face-to-face communication make them so?
In FtF communication, the participants become aware of each other’s intent.
re-evaluation
Tabletop Computers
Commercially Available Lesser Explored
EducationEntertainment
Hospitality
Multi-touch capabilityLarge screen real estate
Collaborative workOffice Environment
Table-like form factorObject Recognition
CSCW
FtF / CMCommunication
Interviews
TaskAssignment
re-evaluationThe aim of the project is to:
1. Study Tabletop Computers as an emerging area in Natural User Interfaces, understand and build on its distinctive properties like its horizontal form factor and multi-touch abilities.
2. Understand advantages of face-to-face communication over computer-mediated communication.
3. Design for a Task Assignment application on the Tabletop Computer which could leverage on advantages of FtF communication.
idea generation
design goals1. To get the best of “meeting table” and “collaboration table”
on the table meant for task assignment.
2. To leverage on the “social” benefits of FtF communication and “productivity” benefits of CM communication in the design for human-human interaction and human-computer interaction during task assignment on tabletop computer.
3. To bring the task assignment activity back on table and help users reach consensus on task assignment activities faster.
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information
Release
Division of work surface for personal and group activity
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information
Relocate
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information
Reorient
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information
Resize
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information2. Managing Display Elements
Replicated controls over centralized controls:
Ease of collaborationUsability
Usage of screen real-estateUser preference
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information2. Managing Display Elements3. Occlusion
Address right-handed occlusion:
270o menuMulti-level sub-menus
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information2. Managing Display Elements3. Occlusion4. Democracy
Address the hierarchy issue in FtF discussion:
All tasks are independentlyrepresented as cards
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information2. Managing Display Elements3. Occlusion4. Democracy5. Metaphors Attempt to make each task cards
as “full metaphor”
design considerations & decisions
1. Public & Private Information2. Managing Display Elements3. Occlusion4. Democracy5. Metaphors6. Skeuomorphs
Attempt to retain the feel of working with physical documents on a table
Samsung SUR40 with Microsoft PixelSensePopularly called Microsoft Surface 2.0
hardware
SDK for Microsoft Surface 2.0
software
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010
C##
prototype
connecting the dots ...
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?2. Why Task Assignment?
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?2. Why Task Assignment?3. Why ‘tasks’ as ‘cards’?
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?2. Why Task Assignment?3. Why ‘tasks’ as ‘cards’?4. Why only 2 login windows on Task Assignment application start-
up?
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?2. Why Task Assignment?3. Why ‘tasks’ as ‘cards’?4. Why only 2 login windows on Task Assignment application start-up?5. Why a specific arrangement of information on task cards?
1. Why Microsoft Surface tabletop computer?2. Why Task Assignment?3. Why ‘tasks’ as ‘cards’?4. Why only 2 login windows on Task Assignment application start-up?5. Why a specific arrangement of information on task cards?6. Why task cards are scattered and not arranged?
analysis
1. Comparative Study2. Heuristic Evaluation
conclusion
1. Can be used as a platform to gauge project development.
2. Learning as a Designer, Researcher and as a Person
thank you
top related