commissioner slides from esu 15 & 16
Post on 29-Mar-2016
214 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
ESU 15 and 16Board Member Workshop
Roger D. Breed, Ed.D.Commissioner of Education
January 23, 2013
Nebraska K-12 Public Education System
Public School Districts 249
Largest K-12 – Omaha 48,086
Smallest – Elba Public School 70
Districts with less than 390 students 143
Public School Students 289,411
Public School Teachers 21,767
Fewer Districts, Geographic Isolation
School Year Total Enrollment
Total Minority FRL ELL SPED
1990-1991 272,990 10% NA NA 12.0%
2000-2001 284,912 17.0% 30.4% 3.67% 15.3%
2010-2011 298,183 29.2% 42.6% 6.72% 15.3%
2012-2013 303,242 30.4% 44.1% 5.97% 15.5%
Nebraska Public Education System
Fewer Supports, Greater Needs
Nebraska Public Schools Mission
“All students high school graduates, college and career ready.”
“The best way to predict the future is to invent it.”-Alan Kay
Certainties (NDE, Learning)
Uncertainties ($, Legislation)???
Fear and Faith . . .
Choose faith.
Confidence in Public Schools vs. Student Performance
Local Issues
State Issues
Federal Issues
Agenda
Local Issues
Attendance
Funding
Safety and Security
Student Learning
STUDENT ATTENDANCE andNeSA SCALE SCORES
Reading Math Science
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2010-11 2011-12 2011-12
Grade 4 – NeSA
Students absent less than 20 days 105 110 112 103 107 NA
Students absent greater than 20 days 84 89 91 80 83 NA
Students absent less than 10 days 106 111 113 105 108 NA
Students absent greater than 10 days 95 101 103 93 96 NA
Grade 8 – NeSA
Students absent less than 20 days 104 108 110 100 101 101
Students absent greater than 20 days 83 82 84 68 71 75
Students absent less than 10 days 107 110 113 103 104 104
Students absent greater than 10 days 93 96 98 85 85 89
Grade 11 – NeSA
Students absent less than 20 days 102 104 106 98 100 102
Students absent greater than 20 days 72 72 72 58 62 78
Students absent less than 10 days 107 107 109 103 105 104
Students absent greater than 10 days 90 87 89 75 78 89
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
More than 10 days absent 29.03% 26.18% 23.59%
More than 15 days absent 14.34% 12.29% 10.94%
More than 20 days absent 21,980(7.76%)
18,100(6.33%)
16,222 (5.63%)
Overall Attendance2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12
Funding
TEEOSA
Flexibility
Accessing Local Sources
Funding – State Aid
“New” Realities
Doing more with less
Fewer people in more remote areas
State Aid - $822m in 2011-12, $852m in 2012-13
State Aid Formula Purposes
Equalize resources for school purposes
Balance formula needs and formula resourcesLimit levies and in effect drive property tax levies to a smaller range
Funding – Per Pupil Costs
Bottom five – Columbus, Mitchell, Gretna, Gering, Norris - $8,310 per ADM
Top five – Coleridge, Wheeler Central, Rising City, Bruning-Davenport, Sioux County - $23,046 per ADM
Funding - EqualizationIn 2007-08, 205 or 81% of school districts were equalized (received state aid)
This year, 2012-13, 147 or 59% of school districts will be equalized
Trend is that fewer school districts have “needs” that are greater than “resources” according to the formula (assessed valuation and enrollment are biggest “drivers”)
Safety and Security
Plan (Rule 10, Section 011)
Committee
Review Annually
Practice
Listening Tour Lessons
Commitment
A Plan
Multiple Measures
Invest in Teachers
Alignment of Efforts
Persist over Time
School Board Duties
Advocacy
Relationships
Investments
Planning
Align Resources
State (NDE) IssuesStandards
NeSA and NePAS
SLDS
Teacher/Leader Evaluation ModelEarly Learning
Virtual (Blended Learning)
CTE/Counselors/Dual Enrollment
Social Studies Adopted
Fine Arts Initiative
Review Cycle – Reading, Math
Common Core State Standards
Standards
School district accountability
To inform state and federal policy-makers
To inform instruction
NePAS Purpose
NePAS: Multiple Measures
• Status (State Tests)▫ Reading/Language Arts (3-8, 11)▫ Math (3-8, 11)▫ Science (3, 8, 11)▫ Writing (4, 8, 11)
• 4 year cohort Graduation Rate
4th grade this year to 4th grade last year
IMPROVEMENT
Same students last year to same students this year (Grades 4-8)
GROWTH
Districts – status, improvement, growth, graduation rate
RANKINGS
CAUTIONS
NePAS: Multiple Measures (continued)
Nebraska State Accountability: NeSA Scores
SUBJECT 2010 2011 2012
Reading 68.6% 71.8% 74.2%
Mathematics 62.8% 67.4%
Science 66.9%
Writing 73.3%
Districts: OverallIndicator Type Indicator District Results State Results Rank
# of Ranked Districts
Status
Average NeSA Reading
110.58 249
Average NeSA Math
104.01 249
Average NeSA Science
99.93 249
Average NeSA Writing
44.25 249
Improvement from 2011 (Different Students)
Average NeSA Reading
3.69 248
Average NeSA Math
3.92 248
Growth since 2011 (Same Students)
NeSA Reading 4.90 248
NeSA Math 3.37 248
Graduation Rate2012 Four-Year Cohort
87.61 % 182
Participation
NeSA Reading No Rankings No Rankings
NeSA Math No Rankings No Rankings
NeSA Science No Rankings No Rankings
NeSA Writing No Rankings No Rankings
Improvement and Growth
Reading Mathematics
Improvement 185 of 248 districts 177 of 248 districts
Growth 198 of 248 districts 181 of 248 districts
Graduation Rate
180 out of 249 districts have a 2012 cohort graduation rate of 90% or higher
2011 Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
86.07%
2011 Cohort Extended 5th Year Graduation Rate
88.58%
2012 Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
87.61%
Accountability
Future “Next Generation”
Assessments
Classification of Districts (LB 870)
Acceptable
Unacceptable
State Intervention/Support
Shared Accountability
Model Evaluation Systems
State Board “develop teacher and principal model evaluation systems for voluntary use by local districts.”
Instructional/leadership practices, student/ school results; professional responsibilities
Guiding recommendations approved November 2012
Design phase, pilot in 2013-14, model available2014-15
Early Learning
New State Board policy
Incentives for technology access, online learning opportunitiesAccess/Quality concerns
Professional development
“Hard horse to ride”
Virtual Education
CTE
Career Readiness
School Counselors
Personal Learning Plans
Dual Enrollment
Uncertainties Federal Policy
NCLB Waiver
Post Secondary
School Security/Safety
Legislation
“Freeze”
Full ESEA Waiver CCR Standards
Differentiated Recognition, Accountability and Support
Effective Instruction through Evaluation
Federal Issues - Waivers
Legislation TEEOSA
Charter Schools
Governance Issues
Blended Education
Thank You!
And choose FAITH in the Future . . .
top related