conference on the legacy and future of feminism april 11, 2008 1 rosalind chait barnett, ph.d....
Post on 14-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
1
Rosalind Chait Barnett, Ph.D.Community, Families & Work Program
Women’s Studies Research CenterBrandeis University
Women in Science: Against All Odds
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
2
There are at least three gender stereotypic beliefs that are widely held, often repeated, and taken to bolster the idea that women’s under-representation in math and science is inevitable.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
3
• Women have never made it into the ranks of the most accomplished mathematicians and scientists.
• Innately, women don’t have what it takes to succeed in math and science.
• Women’s brains, cognitive skills, motivations, and hormones are deficient.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
4
Women have never made it into the ranks of the most accomplished mathematicians and scientists.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
5
European Renaissance: 14th -17th Centuries
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
6
Amazing abundance of male super-star scientists
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
7
Nicholaus Copernicus (1473 - 1543) called the founder of modern astronomy
Galileo Galilei(1564-1642) called the "father of modern observational astronomy", “modern physics", & the "father of science".
Pierre de Fermat (1601 - 1665 ) generally regarded as
the greatest number theorist of all times
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) one of the most important scientists in the field of astronomy, having been the first to explain planetary motion
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
8
Gottfried Leibniz (1646 - 1716) best known for having invented differential and integral calculus.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) the greatest mathematician of his generation and considered one of the foremost scientific intellects of all time.
René Descartes (1596-
1650) is one of the
most important
Western philosophers
of the past few
centuries. During his
lifetime, Descartes
was just as famous as
an original physicist,
physiologist, and
mathematician
Leonardo da Vinci
(1452 – 1519)
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
9
During this extraordinary period, what were the women doing?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
10
Elite women had only two life options:
• An arranged marriage
• Life in a convent
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
11
For elite women, annual pregnancy was the general rule; contraceptives were not widely introduced until the 18th century.
Fraser, A. (1984). The weaker vessel: Knopf.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
12
What was convent life like?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
13
Is it any wonder that the pursuit of science was then and has continued to be deemed a male pursuit?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
14
With the Protestant Reformation and the decline of convent life, other obstacles to women’s education emerged in Europe and in the U.S.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
15
“As the brain develops, the ovaries shrivel” (Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books)
“Education will undermine their health and that of their future children”
“Education will decrease their willingness to do housework or obey their husbands”
“Education will lead to their inclusion in men’s activities and to taking over men’s jobs”
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
16
Are universities hostile places for women faculty?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
17
Does the peer-review system evaluate women and men on an equal basis?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
18
Two Swedish scientists noted that female scientists applying for prestigious fellowships at the Swedish Medical Research Council (MRC) during the 1990s had been less than half as successful as male applicants.
Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387(22 May), 341-343.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
19
Three subjective evaluation parameters:
1. Scientific competence,
2. Relevance of the research proposal, and
3. The quality of the proposed methodology.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
20
The inference is that women earned lower scores because they were less productive.
But were they?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
21
Did men and women with equal objective scientific productivity scores receive the same subjective competence ratings by the MRC reviewers?
NO!
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
22Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nature, 387 (22 May), 341-343.
Figure 1: The mean competence score given to male (red squares) and female (blue squares) applicants by the MRC reviewers as a function of their scientific productivity, measured as total impact. One impact point equals one paper published in a journal with an impact factor of 1.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
23
To be awarded the same competence score as a male colleague, a female scientist would have to produce approximately three extra papers in high-impact journals such as Nature or Science or 20 extra papers in excellent specialist journals such as Atherosclerosis, Gut, Infection and Immunity, Neuroscience or Radiology.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
24
In sum, a female applicant had to be 2.5 times more productive than the average male applicant to receive the same competence score.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
25
This study provides direct evidence that the peer-review system is subject to sex bias.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
26
Women don’t have what it takes to succeed in math and science!
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
27
A meta analysis of math aptitude scores from 4,000,000 students, found that sex differences were tiny.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139-155.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
28
Gender differences in mathematics performance
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Standardized Scores
Females
Males
Effect size = 0.15
Source: Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
Num
ber
of P
eopl
e
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
29
Tests compared math scores of grammar school kids in the U.S., Taiwan and Japan.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
30
• Spelke--five "core systems" at the foundation of mathematical reasoning.
• First, a system for representing small exact numbers of objects — the difference between one, two, and three. (5 mos.)
• Second, understanding numerical magnitudes — the difference between a set of about ten things and a set of about 20 things.
• Third, a system of natural number concepts that children construct as they learn verbal counting. This takes place between about the ages of two and a half and four years.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
31
• Fourth and Fifth are systems first seen in children when they navigate: understanding the geometry of the surrounding layout and identifying landmark objects.
• There is, she notes, a biological foundation to mathematical and scientific reasoning that emerges in children before any formal instruction. These systems develop equally in males and females.
• “There’s not a hint of an advantage for boys over girls in any of these five basic systems.”
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
32
No.
Average performance High performance
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
num
ber
scor
ing
90-1
00%
girlsboys
Are Boys Better at Representing Numbers?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
33
No.
(Spelke, LaMont & Lizcano, aggregated data)
0102030405060708090
100
4-8 years (N = 47)
perc
ent
corr
ect
perf
orm
ance
girlsboys
Average performance High performance
0123456789
10
4-8 years (N = 11)
num
ber
scor
ing
95-1
00%
girlsboys
Are Boys Better at Representing Objects?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
34
Are Boys Better at Learning to Count?
No male advantage on average or at the highest levels.
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 counter
Highest known number
Num
ber
of p
arti
cipa
nts
boysgirls
3 year-old children
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
35
Map-Reading
Children typically begin to understand map tasks at about 4 years.
Considerable variability in map reading at all ages.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
36
Are Boys Better at Map Reading?
No.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
percentile score
num
ber
of p
arti
cipa
nts
girlsboys
4 year-old children
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
37
Women’s brains, cognitive skills, motivations, and hormones are deficient.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
38
Brain Structure
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
39
“men have “systemizing” brains, whereas women have “empathizing” brains”
(Baron-Cohen, 2003, p. 27)
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
40
Brain StructureMale Systematizing Brain Female Empathizing BrainMastery of hunting Making friends
Mastery of tracking Mothering
Trading Gossiping
Achieving & maintaining power “Reading” your partner
Gaining expertise
Tolerating solitude
Taking on leadership roles
Using aggression
– Simon Baron-Cohen, The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. New York: Basic Books, 2003.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
41
Brain Structure
• “The brains of men differ from the brains of women in several ways. Men have larger brains with more neurons (even correcting for body size) though women have a larger percentage of grey matter. Since men and women are equally intelligent overall, the significance of these differences is unknown.”
- Steven Pinker
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
42
Cognitive Skills
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
43
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
44
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
45
In the experimental group, both male and female college students improved with training on the mental rotation test.
However, females showed greater improvement than males, such that the prior gender differences were substantially reduced on the mental rotation task.
Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850-855.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
46
IMPLICATIONS
• Visuospatial skills can be learned, they are neither innate nor immutable.
• Training with an appropriately designed action-video game could play a significant role as part of a larger strategy designed to interest women in science and engineering careers.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
47
All students with low scores on a test of visuospatial ability were encouraged to enroll in a course to improve these skills.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
48
The gains made by students on these spatial-skills tests as a result of participation in the course were statistically and materially significant.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
49
Hormonal Differences
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
50
Boys’ higher level of testosterone causes them to strive for dominance, exhibit more aggression and competition.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
51
Men Women
Developmental Stage Level Range Level Range
Prenatal & First 7 mos.
60 15-120 3 1-10
1-7 yrs old 3 1-10 3 1-10
8 until puberty 100 20-300 15 3-30
Young adult 600 200-1,000 50 15-100
60 yrs old 300 30-600 30 3-60Goldstein, J. S. (2001). Table 3.1, War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Typical testosterone levels by developmental stage and gender (in nanograms per deciliter of blood.)
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
52
Testosterone Social Behavior
TestosteroneTestosterone
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
53
Women are not motivated to work long hours.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
54
“Given the hours people work, it should come as no surprise that many employees (63 percent) would like to work less. There is no difference in the proportions of men and women who would like to work fewer hours, and both would reduce their current total work week by about 11 hours on average if they could.
Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 national study of the changing workforce (No. W98-01). New York: Families and Work Institute.)
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
55
From 1997 to 2007Fewer Mothers Prefer Full-time Work
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
56
• “Part-Time Looks Fine To Working Mothers; 60% Prefer It to Full-Time Washington Post, July 12, 2007
• Work or stay at home? It’s still a quandary; Moms struggle with guilt over their choices. USA Today, October 3, 2007
• Gap widens in how moms view working USA Today, July 12, 2007
• The Full-Time Blues The New York Times, July 24, 2007
• Moms eye part-time jobs to achieve work-life balance The Christian Science Monitor, September 17, 2007
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
57
Were the conclusions supported by the Pew Research Center Study?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
58
Sample of Mothers1997 2007
Full-Time 32% (N=101) 24% (N=54)
Part-time 48% (N=152) 60% (N=155)
Not working 20% (N=63) 19% (N=49)
Total Mothers 317 259
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
59
Reports of work-hours preferences “are very sensitive to question wording” (p.
620). Some questions “are less than ideal because they do not mention income and may thus encourage respondents to report the number of hours they would work if it had no impact on their incomes (p. 624).
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
60
Considering everything, what would be the ideal situation foryou—working full-time, working part-time, or not working at alloutside the home?
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
61
The Power of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
62
Parent-Child Interactions
1. Giving Directions
2. Talking about evidence without causal connections
3. Providing explanations about causal connections.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
63Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3).
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
64Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3).
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
65
Thus, parents may quite unconsciously, be creating a gender bias in science learning years before their kids ever even see the insides of a science classroom.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
66
• Mothers in particular have a strong and long-lasting influence on career choices for their daughters. For example:
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
67
Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers' beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 13.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
68
Thus, to fully understand women’s success in math and science, experiential, cultural, and organizational factors need to be taken into account.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
69
The legacy and future of feminism is the constant challenging of gender stereotypes that limit opportunities for women and men.
Conference on the Legacy and Future of FeminismApril 11, 2008
70
Same Difference
Rosalind Barnett and
Caryl Rivers
www.same-diff.com
top related