construction decision making inventory (cdmi) assessment
Post on 24-Apr-2022
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Construction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) – Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Abstract
Keywords:
1 Introduction
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Table 1 Sample decision making models developed in construction industry
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Table 2 A summary of Who, How, what of different decision models
2 Construction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) Overview
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
3 CDMI Assessment framework
3.1 CDMI Validity Evaluation
Lower Validity Vs Higher Valididty Figure 1 Schematic concept of validity
3.1.1 Assessment of Validity
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
3.1.2 Methodology to Assess the CDMI Validity
Figure 2 CDMI Validation Methodology
Figure 3 CDMI Validity Instrument
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Table 3 Construction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) Validation Matrix
Figure 4 CDMI Validation Plan
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
3.2 CDMI Reliability Evaluation
Lower Reliability Vs Higher Reliability Figure 5 Schematic concept of reliability
3.2.1 Assessment of Reliability
3.2.2 Methodology to Assess Reliability the CDMI
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Figure 6 CDMI Reliability Methodology
Figure 7 CDMI Reliability Instrument
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Table 4 Construction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) Reliability Matrix
Figure 8 CDMI Reliability Evaluation Plan
4 Discussion and Conclusion
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
Table 5 Frequency Distribution of Participants by Major, Institution and Run
Construction Students Architectural Students
(a) Age
Construction Students Architectural Students (b) Overall GPA
Working in Architecture Working in Construction (c) Full-time Equivalent Work Experience
Figure 9 Demographic information of participants in assessment study of CDMI
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
References
Sulbaran T., Nik-Bakht M. 2016 CDMI Assessment Framework for Validity and Reliability
Proc. of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st – Nov. 2nd 2016, Brisbane, Australia
top related