construction industry institute cii webinar series webinar 1 how to participate in cii academic...
Post on 02-Apr-2015
221 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Construction Industry Institute
CII Webinar Series
Webinar 1How to Participate in CII
Academic CommitteeJanuary 11, 2011
CII Academic Community Webinars
• Webinar 1 – January 11, 11:00 AM CST “How to Participate in CII”
• Webinar 2 – Early February, Date TBA “The CII Proposal Process”
• Webinar 3 – May, Date TBA
“How to Successfully Execute a CII Project”
2
Agenda• Introduction to CII – Slides 3 to 14
• CII Knowledge Processes, Practices, and Structure – Slides 14 to 20
• CII Committee Structure – Slides 21 to 47
• Research Process Overview – Slides 47 to 54
• Questions, Answers and Discussion - Slides 55 to 56
3
CII is a research institute of leading
owners, contractors, and academics
working together to advance the business
effectiveness and sustainability of the
world’s capital facilities.
CII is the recognized research institute for
the construction industry, dedicated to
improving the business effectiveness and
sustainability of capital facilities delivery.
CII’s commitment is to create knowledge
that increases every member’s business
success. The active participation of industry
leaders in CII leads to breakthroughs in the
lifecycle value of capital facilities.
CII Vision
To measurably improve the
delivery of capital facilities.
CII Purpose
CII Mission
Increase the participation level within CII to
expand the global competitive
advantage realized through active involvement
and effective use of research findings, including
CII Best Practices.
Add value for members by enhancing the
business effectiveness and sustainability of the capital
facility life cycle through CII research and related
initiatives.
CII Annual Report
CII Website
8
CII Today
• 104 member companies• More than 55 universities• More than 500 research products• 14 active research teams• 2 special academic topic teams• 14 standing committees • Hundreds of active participants
Owner MembersAbbott
Air Liquide
Air Products and Chemicals
Ameren
American Transmission
Anheuser-Busch InBev
Aramco Services
Archer Daniels Midland
Barrick Gold
BP America
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Cargill
Chevron
CITGO Petroleum
ConocoPhillips
Dow Chemical
DuPont
Procter & Gamble
SABIC
Eastman Chemical
Eli Lilly
Escom Holdings Ltd.
ExxonMobil
GlaxoSmithKline
Hovensa
International Paper
Irving Oil
Kaiser Permanente
Marathon Oil
NASA
NOVA Chemicals
Occidental Petroleum
Ontario Power Generation
Petrobras
Praxair
Sasol Technology
Shell Global Solutions US
Smithsonian Institution
Southern Company
Teck Resources Ltd.
Tennessee Valley Authority
TransCanada Corporation
U.S. Architect of the Capitol
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Dept. of Commerce/NIST/Building and Fire Research Lab
U.S. Dept. of Energy
U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services
U.S. Dept. of State
U.S. General Services Admin.
Contractor MembersAker SolutionsAlstom PowerAMECApex Engineering, Inc.AZCO Inc. Baker Concrete ConstructionBateman EngineeringBechtel GroupBentley SystemsBIS Frucon Industrial ServicesBlack & VeatchBurns & McDonnellCB&ICCC GroupCDI Engineering SolutionsCH2M HILLCoreworxCSA Group
Day & ZimmermannDresser-Rand CompanyEmerson Process ManagementeProject ManagementFaithful+GouldFlad & AssociatesFluorFoster Wheeler USAGrinaker-LTA/E+PCGross Mechanical ContractorsGS Engineering & ConstructionHargrove Engineers + Const.HiltiJacobsJMJ AssociatesKBRLauren Engineers & ConstructorsM. A. Mortenson
McDermott InternationalMustangOmniwareOracle USAParsonsPathfinderS&B Engineers and Const.The Shaw GroupSiemens EnergySNC-LavalinTechnipURS CorporationVictaulic CompanyWalbridgeWanzek ConstructionWorleyParsonsZachryZurich
* Headquarters and founding university
Bold – Current Research
Universities Performing Research 1983-2010
University of Alabama
Arizona State University
University of Arkansas
Auburn University
Baylor University
Bucknell University
University of California-Berkeley
Carnegie Mellon University
University of Cincinnati
Clemson University
University of Colorado-Boulder
Colorado State University
Columbia University
Drexel University
East Carolina University
University of Florida
Georgia Institute of Technology
University of Houston
University of Illinois
Illinois Institute of Technology
Iowa State University
University of Kansas
University of Kentucky
Lehigh University
University of Maryland
University of Michigan
University of Milwaukee-Wisconsin
Michigan State UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversity of New MexicoNorth Carolina State UniversityNorth Dakota State UniversityOhio UniversityOklahoma State UniversityOregon State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State University
University of PittsburghPurdue UniversityPolytechnic University of New YorkSan Diego State UniversitySan Jose State UniversityStanford UniversityState University of New York-AlbanyVanderbilt UniversityVirginia Tech Texas A&M UniversityThe University of Texas at Austin*Tsinghua UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonWorcester Polytechnic Institute
Construction Industry Institute
• Non-governmental/non-profit
• Voluntary organization
– Small staff approx 20 people
– Over 700 volunteers from industry
– Collaboration with over fifty
universities
CII Knowledge Processes
Knowledge
Management
Knowledge
AssessmentKnowledge
Dissemination
Knowledge
Creation
Research to define best practices, breakthroughs, and industry norms.
Dissemination through publications, implementation guides, educational materials, courses, workshops, and conferences.
Assessment of the impact of CII practices through benchmarking.
Management, organization, and assessment of the 500-plus CII documents and publications.
CII Practices (Research Findings)
Project Planning Phase• Attract and Maintain Skilled Workers• Automated Identification• Construction Input in Front End Planning• Effective Use of Global Engineering Workforce• Environmental Remediation Management• Equitable Risk Allocation• Information Integration• International Project Risk Assessment• Leader Selection• Modularization/Preassembly• Organizational Work Structure• Project Delivery and Contract Strategies• Project Security• Project Teams• Technology Implementation• Value Management• Work Process Simulation
Design/ Construction/ Startup Phases• Craft Productivity Practices• Design for Maintainability• Design for Safety• Engineering Productivity Measurement• Leveraging Technology• Piping Design
Project Life• Cost & Schedule Control• Employee Incentives• Fully Integrated & Automated Project
Processes (FIAPP)• Global Project Control & Mgmt Systems• Management of Education & Training• Managing Workers’ Compensation • Project Health Assessment• Small Projects Execution
Major Influence
Rapidly DecreasingInfluence
LowInfluence
ScopeDefinition
Influence Commitment$$
ConceptualAnalysisand R&D
Pre-ProjectPlanning
BasicData andScoping
ProjectAuthorization
ProductionEngineering
andProcurement
Construction EngineeringComplete
Turnoverand
Start-up
Le
vel o
f In
flu
en
ce
Pro
jec
t E
xpe
nd
itu
res
Project Life Cycle
Cost Influence Curves
CII Industry Leadership
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009325 413 477 497 527 613 644 770 518 765 995 936 1,117 1,073 1,129 1,195 1,333 1,297 1,766 2,085 2,386
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1614.30 14.20
13.00 13.1012.20
11.8010.60
9.909.50
8.80 8.60 8.307.907.10 6.80 6.40 6.30 5.90
5.404.70
7.196.12
5.324.31
3.44 3.002.66 2.30
1.60 1.59 1.671.03 1.02 1.23 1.16 0.88 0.72 0.58 0.68 0.57 0.63
Industry*
CII
Year and Work Hours (MM)
To
tal R
ec
ord
ab
le In
cid
en
ce
Ra
te
*OSHA Construction Division, NAICS 236-238 (SIC 15-17) Reflects OSHA Reporting Change
CII Organization
Board of Advisors
Communities of Practice
Product Review Board
Knowledge Creation Knowledge Dissemination
Implementation Strategy
Committee
Professional Development Committee
Benchmarking & Metrics
Committee
Knowledge Management Committee
Special Functions
Branding Implementation
Committee
Conference Committee
Finance Committee
Membership Committee
Nominating Committee
Alliances
Research Teams
Academic Committee
Breakthrough Strategy
Committee
Research Committee
KnowledgeAssessment
KnowledgeManagement
Executive Committee
Strategic Planning
Committee
Standing Committees
Industry-Sector Benchmarking
CII Senior Staff
Jewell WaltersMembership and Annual Conference
Manuel GarciaProfessional Development and Implementation
Kim AllenKnowledge Management, Branding, Communities of Practice
Steve ThomasResearch, Breakthrough Strategy, and Academic Liaison
Wayne CrewDirector
Stephen MulvaBenchmarking & Metrics
Research Support Staff
Jacqueline ThomasTechnical Writer/Editor
Kristi DelaneySr. Program Coordinator
Junghye SonGraduate Research Assistant
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Executive Committee Purpose:
• Represents the Board of Advisors• Provides leadership and direction for all
Institute activities in accordance with the Strategic Plan and Governance Plan.
• Appoints committee chairman that are not elected.
• Approves membership appointments.• Creates Ad Hoc committees when necessary.
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Randy Abdallah, Walbridge , Vice-ChairDr. John Borcherding, University of Texas at AustinBarry Christen, URS CorporationEarl Clark, DuPontFrank Gay, WorleyParsonsJim Gibson, Alstom PowerTom Kudele, ExxonMobilDon Leinweber, Mustang EngineeringTom Napier, USACEMark Palmer, NISTCindy Richartz, AbbottEd Ruane, FluorStan Trip, ConocoPhillipsDr. Ken Walsh, San Diego State University David Wolfson, Air Products and Chemicals, ChairDr. Steve Thomas, CIIJacqueline Thomas, CIIKristi Delaney, CII
Research Committee
Research Committee Mission:
• Provides policy to guide the CII research process.
• Implements the topic generation and prioritization process for the CII Board of Advisors.
• Implements the RFQ process to solicit and select the best proposals reflecting member company interest and providing greatest value to CII.
• Supervises the Product Review Board.
Research Committee Outputs
• Annual topic slate to solicit BOA interest and priorities for research
• RFQ process to solicit and select best value proposals from the academic community
• Staffed and aligned research teams• A process that produces high value/impact research
and research publications to include implementation resources for member companies and the industry
• Research report outs at the Annual Conference
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Academic Committee
• Newly chartered in 2006
• Academic Committee Leadership– Chair – Edd Gibson, Arizona State– Vice-chair – Carl Haas, Waterloo– Jr.-chair – Carlos Caldas, University of Texas at Austin
Academic Committee SubcommitteesSubcommittee Chair University
Webinar Sponsorship Stu Anderson Texas A&M
Annual Conference Speaker Chema de la Garza Virginia Tech
Committee Website Paul Goodrum University of Kentucky
Awards Edd Gibson Arizona State University
Poster Session Jochen Teizer Georgia Tech
CII Products in the Classroom
Richard Burt Auburn
CRC Technical Session Carlos Caldas UT Austin
29
Academic Committee Mission:
The primary forum for the academic community within CII
to provide its expertise in both research methodology
and subject matter to the institute.
Duties include:– identifying subject matter experts
– providing input to the research process
– identifying and grooming new academics to serve as CII
researchers
– integrating CII research and products into the university
curriculums
– offering insights for new directions for CII
Academic Committee Members
31
Stu Anderson Texas A&M Baabak Ashuri Georgia TechSalman Azhar AuburnDennis Bausman ClemsonAmir Behzadan University of Central FloridaJohn Borcherding The University of Texas at AustinRichard Burt Auburn UniversityCarlos Caldas University of Texas at AustinChung-Suk Cho University of North Carolina-CharlotteYong Cho University of Nebraska-LincolnOswald Chong KansasIvan Damnjanovic Texas A&M UniversityChema de la Garza Virginia TechIslam El-adaway Mississippi State Neil Eldin University of HoustonTamer El-Diraby University of TorontoMohamed El-Gafy Michigan State Aminah Fayek University of AlbertaDaniel Forgues Ecole de Technologie SuperieureEdd Gibson Arizona State University Mani Golpavar-Fard Virginia TechPaul Goodrum University of KentuckyDavid Grau The University of AlabamaBud Griffis New York UniversityCarl Haas University of WaterlooMarwa Hassan LSUMark Hastak PurdueKasun Hewage University of British ColumbiaJoe Horlen Texas A&M University
Seokyon Hwang Lamar UniversityEd Jaselskis Iowa State UniversityAmy Javernick-Will University of ColoradoDavid Jeong Oklahoma State UniversityKim LaScola Needy University of ArkansasSanghyun Lee University of Alberta - EdmontonFernanda Leite The University of Texas at AustinBrenda McCabe University of TorontoCarol Menassa University of WisconsinCindy Menches Illinois Institute of TechnologyJohn Messner Pennsylvania State UniversityGiovanni Migliaccio University of New MexicoEd Minchin University of FloridaKeith Molenaar University of ColoradoMohammad Najafi The University of Texas at ArlingtonBill O'Brien The University of Texas at AustinMehmet Ozbek Colorado State UniversityAnu Pradhan Drexel UniversityRobert Ries University of FloridaIhab Saad University of CincinnatiPramen Shrestha University of NevadaLucio Soibelman Carnegie-Mellon UniversityJongchul Song North Dakota State UniversityLingguang Song The University of HoustonCarrie Sturts Dossick University of Washington JT Taylor Columbia UniversityTimothy Taylor University of KentuckyJochen Teizer Georgia Institute of TechnologyAli Touran Northeastern UniversityJohn Walewski Texas A&M University
Critical Interfaces
• Academic and Research CommitteeTo improve the quality of CII academic research
• Academic and CII Standing Committees/ COPs:To increase the participation of the academic community within CII
• Academic Committee and CII StaffStaff/logistic support for meetings, webinars and poster session, and contract admin support for curriculum study.
AC Membership
Membership in the Academic Committee will consist of (at minimum),– academics engaged by CII to conduct research– academics engaged by CII to conduct education
activities– and those that serve on CII standing committees
All academics seeking membership on the AC will apply to CII and upon completion & approval of the application, receive an appointment for 3 years with commitment to subcommittee work.
Academic Committee Leadership
Leadership of the Academic Committee shall consist of a chairperson, co-chairperson and committee junior chairperson.
The leadership shall be selected from the AC membership and shall serve two year terms.
Academic Committee Meetings
• 2010
– With CRC
– With CII Annual Conf
• 2011
– With AGC: Las Vegas March 23rd
– With CII Annual Conf: Chicago July 28th
35
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Benchmarking & Metrics Committee Mission
• To define key EPC elements and performance metrics and process to collect and correlate them with related project practices
• Guide CII in providing member companies with performance measures and industry trends on key elements of the EPC process
• Assist member companies in assessing their performance against the collective data and helping them identify Best Practices and other opportunities to improve capital effectiveness
• Provide quantitative feedback to help CII guide its research, implementation, and other activities.
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Implementation Strategy Committee Mission & Vision
ISC Mission: Engage members to implement CII practices.
Promote participation in activities and utilization of knowledge to implement work practices and manage change.
ISC Vision: Establish use of the CII knowledgebase as an
indispensable resource to integrate work practices, improve communication and, manage change in everyday work activities.
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Professional Development Committee Mission
Provide continuing professional development opportunities for CII members by:
1. Enabling implementation of CII research results to meet member company needs
2. Evaluating opportunities & industry program trends
3. Developing new learning materials
4. Creating outreach programs with educational institutions
5. Advocating value of CII research-based education
6. Planning for the future
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
43
Knowledge Management Committee Charter
• Manage CII’s Body of Knowledge– Facilitate access to the Body of Knowledge through the CII website – Develop policy to maintain and add value to the Knowledge Structure – Approve changes to the Knowledge Structure, including placement
of new products and changes in content– Review existing publications for classification, updating or archiving– Identify, recommend and validate emerging Best Practices
• Recommend research topics as needed– To refresh Best Practices or fill gaps in the Knowledge Structure
• Establish Communities of Practice and provide oversight– To collaborate and focus on specific industry topics or practice areas
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Branding Implementation Committee
• The Branding Implementation Committee was sanctioned by the Executive Committee and formed in September 2007 to evaluate and strengthen CII’s brand
• The goal of the committee is to position and promote CII as a recognized industry leader.
45
CII Standing Committees
• Executive
• Research
• Academic Committee
• Benchmarking & Metrics
• Implementation Strategy
• Professional Development
• Knowledge Management
• Branding Implementation
• Breakthrough Strategy
Breakthrough Strategy Committee Mission & Vision
• Mission: To develop a process that will insure adequate generation of breakthrough research and other ideas and opportunities in support of other CII core processes.
• Vision: To establish a long term process in which CII continues to identify, nurture, develop and harvest breakthrough ideas for capital project delivery for the benefit of CII members.
CII Research Team Process
CII Research ProcessNeeds Assessment through RT Plan Approval
Research Needs Assessment
Topic Slate Development
BOA Review
BOAVote
Continue Staffing
RTKick-
off
Research PlanDevelopment
PlanApproval
BudgetApproval
Prepare & Submit
Q & I
RFQ Sent toAcademicCommunity
SelectPIs
CII Funds PI Travel(Prior to Proposal
Approval)
Execute MOA w/
Universities
Request for topic input
• During September request for topic input sent to:– CII Standing Committees– CII Communities of Practice– FIATECH– Other External Sources
• Topic ideas also obtained from CII Board during roundtable discussions at fall meeting.
Topic slate development
• Research Committee assesses hundreds of topic ideas collected during the fall.
• Research Committee meets in January to determine final slate.
• Slate submitted to Board 30 days prior to spring meeting.
RFQ
• Request for Qualifications and Interest to be sent to the academic community NLT Feb 25th
• Academic researchers desiring to receive the RFQ should provide the CII Program Coordinator, Kristi Delaney (kldelaney@mail.utexas.edu) their CV NLT Feb 15th
• PI statement of Q&I must be submitted IAW instructions provided in the RFQ and will be due NLT Mar 17th
• A pre Q&I submittal conference call will be scheduled IAW RFQI instructions to clarify requirements as necessary.
53
54
55
Academic Committee Website
Webinar 1How to Participate in CII
Questions?
CII Academic Community Webinars
• Webinar 1 – January 11, 11:00 AM CST “How to Participate in CII”
• Webinar 2 – Early February, Date TBA “The CII Proposal Process”
• Webinar 3 – May, Date TBA
“How to Successfully Execute a CII Project”
56
top related