convergence and synergy: social q&a meets virtual reference services
Post on 20-Nov-2014
136 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Convergence & Synergy: Social Q&A Meets Virtual Reference Services
ASIS&T, 75TH Annual Meeting 30 October 2012http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/synergy.html
Chirag Shah
Assistant ProfessorRutgers University
chirags@rutgers.edu
Marie L. Radford
Associate ProfessorRutgers University
mradford@rutgers.edu
Lynn Silipigni Connaway
Senior Research ScientistOCLC
connawal@oclc.org
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Where We Are Now
VRS SQA
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Current Model of Virtual Reference Services (VRS)
Question
POSITIVES
• 20+ years
• High quality/accurate
• Professionals
• Consortium collaborations
CHALLENGES
• Funding cuts
• Monolithic
• Collaboration limited beyond consortia
• UnderutilizedAnswer
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Social Question & Answer (SQA)
POSITIVES
• Community-based
• Collaborative
• Publicly available
• Low cost
• Quick turnaround
• Easy build-up of social capital
CHALLENGE
• No guarantee of quality of answers
• Some questions receive no answers
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Convergence of VRS & SQA
SQA VRS
•Similar components
•Previous efforts
• Slam the Boards
• Enquire
• Rated best answer 79% of time
•Collaboration possibilities intriguing
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Cyber Synergy: Seeking Sustainability through Collaboration
between Virtual Reference & Social Q&A Sites
Partners: OCLC & Rutgers
Funded by IMLS for $250K
2-year project
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Research Questions
• What is the effectiveness of various VRS & SQA services, quality of content provided, & their relative merits & shortcomings?
• How does accuracy compare between VRS & SQA sites?
• What lessons can be learned from SQA sites that could be applied to VRS & vice-versa?
• How can VRS become more collaborative, within & between libraries, & tap more effectively into librarian’s subject expertise?
• How can we design systems & services within & between VRS & SQA for better quality & sustainability?
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Project Phases
Phase I Phase II Phase IIITranscript analysis Telephone Interviews Constructing Design
Specifications
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase I: VRS & SQA Transcript Analysis
•560 transcripts (296,158 total)
• 350 live chat
• 210 Qwidget (IM)
• 11 coding schemes
•1000 Q&A pairs from Yahoo Answers! (>1 million total)
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase I: Transcript Analysis – Preliminary Results
• Subject - Dewey Decimal Classification
• Broad range
• Social sciences & technology - largest percentages
• Type of Question
• Procedural & Ready Reference largest percentages
• Accuracy
• 90% accurate for Ready Reference
• 75% correct with citation included
• Difficulty
• READ Scale (Gerlich & Berard, ‘07)
• Most questions fall 2-3 on READ scale (require some effort & time)
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase II: Telephone Interviews
•Librarians
• 50 VRS librarians
•Users
• VRS
• 50 QP live chat & Qwidget users
• SQA
• 50 services users & expert users
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase II: VRS & SQA Phone Interview Demographics
•Librarians
•18 academic
• 16 other
•VRS/SQA Users
•5 VRS only
•12 SQA only
•56 used both
Participant geographic distribution
LibrarianVRS/SQA User
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase II: SQA FtF Interview Demographics
•36 SQA student users
•24 undergraduate
•12 graduate
•10 subject librarians
•Major themes
• Important for success
• Topic
• Length
• Visibility
• Timeliness
• Clarity
• Availability
• Verifiability
• Relevance, quality, & satisfaction on equal planes
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase II: SQA Interview Analysis
• Exploratory
• Uses & experiences in physical & digital libraries & SQAs
• Preliminary results
• “Goodness” of answers
• Synergy of SQA & VRS
• Collaboration
• Leverage subject knowledge
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Phase II: Librarian Interviews
• 34 phone interviews conducted to date
• Major themes
• Draft coding scheme developed
• Important
• Attaining sustained user satisfaction
• Teaching search strategies
• Better via electronic media
• Cite sources
The world’s libraries. Connected.
The Takeaway
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Goals & Impact on VRS/SQA Services
•Improve underutilized services
•Understand how to leverage librarian subject expertise through virtual collaborations
•Develop guidelines for practice
•Make recommendations for evaluation of VRS & SQA
•Inform systems design
•Connect potential users with SQA services & VRS
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Next Steps
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Next Steps
•Further analysis of SQA questions
• Subject
• Question Type
• Questions failing to obtain answers
•Continue interviews
• VRS/SQA users
• VRS librarians
•Conduct design sessions with experts
• Specifications for system design
ANSWERS(0)
Answer Question
Nee help with English please?
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Funding & Acknowledgements
Cyber Synergy: Seeking Sustainability through Collaboration between Virtual Reference and Social Q&A Sites
• $250,000 for 2011-2013
• Funded by IMLS, OCLC, & Rutgers University
• Co-PIs Marie Radford (RU), Lynn Silipigni Connaway (OCLC), & Chirag Shah (RU)
http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/synergy.html
• We thank Eric Choi, Alyssa Darden, Kathy Juliano, Vanessa Kitzie, Hanna Lee, and Stephanie Mikitish for their assistance in coding, analysis, and data presentation.
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Selected Bibliography
Connaway, L. S. & Radford, M. L. (2011). Seeking Synchronicity: Revelations and recommendations for virtual reference. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved on February 26, 2012 from http://www.oclc.org/reports/synchronicity/full.pdf
Radford, M. L., & Connaway, L. S. (forthcoming). Not dead yet! A longitudinal study of query type and ready reference accuracy in live chat and IM reference. Library & Information Science Research, 35(1).
Radford, M. L., & Connaway, L. S. (2005-2008). Seeking synchronicity: Evaluating virtual reference services from user, non-user, and librarian perspectives. Funded by National Leadership Grants for Libraries program of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/synchronicity/default.htm
Radford, M. L., Connaway, L. S., Confer, P., Sabolsci-Boros, S., & Kwon, H. (2011). “Are we getting warmer?” Query clarification in live chat virtual reference. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 259-279.
Radford, M. L., Connaway, L. S., & Shah, C. (2011-2013). Cyber Synergy: Seeking sustainability through collaboration between virtual reference and social Q&A sites. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/synergy/default.htm
Shah, C., & Kitzie, V. (2012). Social Q & A and virtual reference-comparing apples and oranges with the help of experts and users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 2020-2036.
The world’s libraries. Connected.
Questions?
Marie L. Radford: mradford@rutgers.edu
Lynn Silipigni Connaway: connawal@oclc.org
Chirag Shah: chirags@rutgers.edu
??
??
? ?
?
?
top related