creative commons and open glam

Post on 14-Jul-2015

87 Views

Category:

Law

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Our goal:“Universal access to research and education, full participation in culture.”

More free More restrictive

1

1. Free Licences

2. Projects

First point:It’s becoming much easier to

access New Zealand’s cultural heritage

Second point:The technical barriers to access

and reuse are dropping

Third point:This means you can't predict who

will do exciting things with your work

Media Text Hack

CC Kiwi

MIT Reader Stories

“I am in-between post-docs and I am having difficulty obtaining journal access” –Post-doc, US

“I don’t have access to many articles due to … sanctions. … I really appreciate this policy of MIT that helped me a lot.” – Researcher, Middle East

“For a small, publicly funded …media like the one I direct…academic knowledge… can be quite time-consuming and often very expensive.”

Fourth point:Obvious potential to disseminate

heritage items for reuse

Getty Museum Closed:121 Purchases p/m Open: 60,000 downloads p/m

Claude-Joseph Vernet (French, 1714 - 1789)A Calm at a Mediterranean Port, 1770, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles

Fifth point:The legal barriers to dissemination

& reuse remain.

Copyright Graffiti Sign by Horia Varlan CC-BY

https://flic.kr/p/7vBD4TCopyright

Copyright is very restrictive. Automatic.Applies online.No 'c' required.Lasts for 50 years after death.

Heald, Paul J., How Copyright Makes Books and Music Disappear (and How Secondary Liability Rules Help Resurrect Old Songs) (July 5, 2013). Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS14-07; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 13-54. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2290181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2290181

Sixth point:Usage rights statements are often

vague, overly restrictive & not standardised across the sector

Seventh point:Many heritage institutions feel

tension between kaitiaki and reuse

“Grayson, Westley, Stanislaus County...” via US Nat. ArchivesNo Known Copyright

https://flic.kr/p/8UAPVT What to Do?.

Start from the other direction

First:Clearly mark out-of-copyright

works as such.

Second:Use Creative Commons licensing

for works with CC-friendly donors

Add Creative Commons option to donor/deposit agreements.

Third:Works for which institution holds

copyright: use CC licensing

Wait. What is Creative Commons, anyway?

Here's the pitch:Creative Commons licences are clear, simple, free, legally robust and let you keep your copyright.

Public DomainFew Restrictions

Public DomainFew Restrictions

All Rights ReservedFew Freedoms

Public DomainFew Restrictions

All Rights ReservedFew Freedoms

Some Rights ReservedRange of Licence Options

Four Licence Elements

Attribution

Non Commercial

No Derivatives

Share Alike

Six Licences

More free More restrictive

Layers

Licence symboll

Human readable

Lawyer readable

Go to creativecommons.org/choose

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cIWmV5nCF8o97Nrb8wYZWfQ97FG-4ylNuXezh2nlBBM/edit

Man from the city, 1971, by Jan Nigro. Purchased 1971. Te Papa (1971-0036-2)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 New Zealand licenceTe Papa

Massed troops at a New Zealand Division thanksgiving service, World War I. Ref: 1/2-013806-G. No known copyright.

http://natlib.govt.nz/records/22684353NLNZ; WW100

resources.creativecommons.org.nzcreativecommons.org.nznzcommons.org.nz@cc_aotearoamatt@creativecommons.org.nzelizabeth@creativecommons.org.nzgroups.creativecommons.org.nz(we're also on Loomio)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

top related