cs433/533 computer networks lecture 12 cdn 2/16/2012 1

CS433/533Computer Networks

Lecture 12

2/16/2012

Programming assignment 1 status

Recap: High-Performance Network Servers

Avoid blocking (so that we can reach bottleneck throughput) Introduce threads

Limit unlimited thread overhead Thread pool, async io

Coordinating data access synchronization (lock, synchronized)

Coordinating behavior: avoid busy-wait Wait/notify; FSM

Extensibility/robustness Language support/Design for interfaces

Recap: Operational Laws

Utilization law: U = XS Forced flow law: Xi = Vi X Bottleneck device: largest Di = Vi Si Little’s Law: Qi = Xi Ri Bottleneck analysis:

},min{)(max

},max{)( max ZNDDNR

Recap: Why Multiple Servers?

Scalability beyond single server capability and geolocation of a

single server

Redundancy and fault tolerance Administration/maintenance (e.g., incremental upgrade) Redundancy (e.g., to handle failures)

System/software architecture Resources may be naturally distributed at different

machines (e.g., run a single copy of a database server due to single license; access to resource from third party)

Security (e.g., front end, business logic, and database)

Recap: Load Direction: Basic Architecture

Four components Server state

monitoring• Load (incl. failed or

not); what requests it can serve

Path properties between clients and servers

• E.g., Bw, delay, loss, network cost

Server selection alg.• Alg. to choose site(s) and

server(s)

Server direction mechanism

• Inform/direct a client to chosen server(s)

InternetInternet

Client

Site A Site B

Recap: Load Direction

server state

path propertybetween

servers/clients

serverselectionalgorithm

specificrequest ofa client

notifyclient

about selection(direction

mechanism)

Basic Direction Mechanisms

Implicit IP anycast

• Same IP address shared by multiple servers and announced at different parts of the Internet. Network directs different clients to different servers (e.g., Limelight)

Load balancer (smart switch) indirection Reverse proxy

Explicit Mirror/server listing: client is given a list of candidate

DNS names DNS name resolution gives a list of server addresses A single server IP address may be a virtual IP address

for a cluster of physical servers (smart switch)

Direction Mechanisms are Often Combined

DNS name1

IP1 IP2 IPn

Cluster1in US East

Cluster2in US West

Load balancer

Cluster2in Europe

Load balancer

servers

DNS name2

Example: Netflix

Example: Netflix Manifest File

Client player authenticate and then downloads manifest file from servers at Amazon Cloud

Example: Netflix Manifest File

Example: wikipedia architecture

13http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/images/8/81/Bergsma_-_Wikimedia_architecture_-_2007.pdf

DNS Indirection and Rotation

157.166.226.25

router

DNS serverfor cnn.com

IP addressof cnn.com

157.166.226.25157.166.226.26

IP addressof cnn.com

157.166.226.26157.166.226.25

157.166.226.26

157.166.255.18

Example: Amazon Elastic Load Balancing

Use the elb-create-lb command to create an Elastic Load Balancer.

Use the elb-register-instances-with-lb command to register the Amazon EC2 instances that you want to load balance with the Elastic Load Balancer.

Elastic Load Balancing automatically checks the health of your load balancing Amazon EC2 instances. You can optionally customize the health checks by using the elb-configure-healthcheck command.

Traffic to the DNS name provided by the Elastic Load Balancer is automatically distributed across your load balanced, healthy Amazon EC2 instances.

15http://aws.amazon.com/documentation/elasticloadbalancing/

Details: Step 11. Call CreateLoadBalancer with the following parameters:

AvailabilityZones = us-east-1a Listeners

• Protocol = HTTP• InstancePort = 8080• LoadBalancerPort = 80• LoadBalancerName = MyLoadBalancer

The operation returns the DNS name of your LoadBalancer. You can then map that to any other domain name (such as www.mywebsite.com) using a CNAME or some other technique.

PROMPT> elb-create-lb MyLoadBalancer --headers --listener "lb-port=80,instance-port=8080,protocol=HTTP" --availability-zones us-east-1a

Result:DNS-NAME DNS-NAME DNS-NAME MyLoadBalancer-2111276808.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

16http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/ElasticLoadBalancing/latest/DeveloperGuide/

Details: Step 2

2. Call ConfigureHealthCheck with the following parameters: LoadBalancerName = MyLoadBalancer Target = http:8080/ping

• NoteMake sure your instances respond to /ping on port 8080 with an HTTP 200 status code.

Interval = 30 Timeout = 3 HealthyThreshold = 2 UnhealthyThreshold = 2

PROMPT> elb-configure-healthcheck MyLoadBalancer --headers --target "HTTP:8080/ping" --interval 30 --timeout 3 --unhealthy-threshold 2 --healthy-threshold 2

Result:HEALTH-CHECK TARGET INTERVAL TIMEOUT HEALTHY-THRESHOLD UNHEALTHY-THRESHOLDHEALTH-CHECK HTTP:8080/ping 30 3 2 2

Details: Step 3

3. Call RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancer with the following parameters: LoadBalancerName = MyLoadBalancer Instances = [ i-4f8cf126, i-0bb7ca62 ]

PROMPT> elb-register-instances-with-lb MyLoadBalancer --headers --instances i-4f8cf126,i-0bb7ca62

Result:INSTANCE INSTANCE-ID INSTANCE i-4f8cf126 INSTANCE i-0bb7ca62

Discussion

Advantages and disadvantages of using DNS

Clustering with VIP: Basic Idea Clients get a single service IP address,

called virtual IP address (VIP) A virtual server (also referred to as load

balancer, vserver or smart switch) listens at VIP address and port

A virtual server is bound to a number of physical servers running in a server farm

A client sends a request to the virtual server, which in turn selects a physical server in the server farm and directs this request to the selected physical server

VIP Clustering

server array

Clients

L4: TCPL7: HTTP

SSLetc.

Goalsserver load balancingfailure detectionaccess control filteringpriorities/QoSrequest localitytransparent caching smart

switch

virtual IP addresses

(VIPs)

What to switch/filter on?L3 source IP and/or VIPL4 (TCP) ports etc.L7 URLs and/or cookiesL7 SSL session IDs

Big Picture

Load Balancer (LB): Basic Structure

LBClient

Server1

Server2

Server3

Problem of the basic structure?

D=VIPS=client

Problem

Client to server packet has VIP as destination address, but real servers use RIPso if LB just forwards the packet from client to a real

server, the real server may drop the packeto Reply from real server to client has real server IP as

source -> client will drop the packet

Real Server TCP socket space

state: listeningaddress: {*.6789, *:*}completed connection queue: C1; C2 sendbuf:recvbuf:

state: establishedaddress: {128.36.232.5:6789, 198.69.10.10.1500}

sendbuf: recvbuf:

state: establishedaddress: {128.36.232.5:6789, 198.69.10.10.1500}

sendbuf:recvbuf:

D=VIPS=client

Solution 1: Network Address Translation (NAT)

LB does rewriting/translation

Thus, the LB is similar to a typical NAT gateway with an additional scheduling function

Load Balancer

Example Virtual Server via NAT

LB/NAT Flow

SLB/NAT Flow: Details

1. When a user accesses a virtual service provided by the server cluster, a request packet destined for the virtual IP address (the IP address to accept requests for virtual service) arrives at the load balancer.

2. The load balancer examines the packet's destination address and port number. If they match a virtual service in the virtual server rule table, a real server is selected from the cluster by a scheduling algorithm and the connection is added to hash table that records connections. Then, the destination address and the port of the packet are rewritten to those of the selected server, and the packet is forwarded to the server. When an incoming packet belongs to an established connection, the connection can be found in the hash table and the packet is rewritten and forwarded to the right server.

3. The request is processed by one of the physical servers. 4. When response packets come back, the load balancer

rewrites the source address and port of the packets to those of the virtual service. When a connection terminates or timeouts, the connection record is removed from the hash table.

5. A reply is sent back to the user.

LB/NAT Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages:

o Only one public IP address is needed for the load balancer; real servers can use private IP addresses

o Real servers need no change and are not aware of load balancing

Problemo The load balancer must on the critical patho The load balancer may become the bottleneck

due to load to rewrite request and response packets

• Typically, rewriting responses has a lot more load because there are typically a lot more response packets

LB with Direct Reply

LBClient

Server1

Server2

Server3

Direct reply

Each real server uses VIP as its IP address

LB/DR Architecture

load balancer

Connectedby a single

switch

Why IP Address Matters?

Each network interface card listens to an assigned MAC address A router is configured with the range of IP addresses connected

to each interface (NIC) To send to a device with a given IP, the router needs to translate

IP to MAC (device) address The translation is done by the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)

ARP Protocol

ARP is “plug-and-play”:o nodes create their ARP tables without

intervention from net administrator

A broadcast protocol: o Router broadcasts query frame, containing

queried IP address • all machines on LAN receive ARP query

o Node with queried IP receives ARP frame, replies its MAC address

ARP in Action

- Router broadcasts ARP broadcast query: who has VIP?

- ARP reply from LB: I have VIP; my MAC is MACLB

- Data packet from R to LB: destination MAC = MACLB

Router R

D=VIPS=client

LB/DR Problem

VIP VIP VIPVIP

ARP and race condition:• When router R gets a packet with dest. address VIP, it broadcasts an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) request: who has VIP?• One of the real servers may reply before load balancer

Solution: configure real servers to not respond to ARP request

Router R

LB via Direct Routing

The virtual IP address is shared by real servers and the load balancer.

Each real server has a non-ARPing, loopback alias interface configured with the virtual IP address, and the load balancer has an interface configured with the virtual IP address to accept incoming packets.

The workflow of LB/DR is similar to that of LB/NAT: o the load balancer directly routes a packet to the selected

server • the load balancer simply changes the MAC address of the data frame to

that of the server and retransmits it on the LAN (how to know the real server’s MAC?)

o When the server receives the forwarded packet, the server determines that the packet is for the address on its loopback alias interface, processes the request, and finally returns the result directly to the user

LB/DR Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages:

o Real servers send response packets to clients directly, avoiding LB as bottleneck

Disadvantages:o Servers must have non-arp alias interfaceo The load balancer and server must have

one of their interfaces in the same LAN segment

Example Implementation of LB

An example open source implementation is Linux virtual server (linux-vs.org)

• Used by– www.linux.com

– sourceforge.net

– wikipedia.org

• More details on ARP problem: http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html

o Many commercial LB servers from F5, Cisco, …

More details please read chapter 2 of Load Balancing Servers, Firewalls, and Caches

Question to Think About

How do you test if Amazon ELB uses LB/NAT or LB/DR?

Discussion: Problem of theLoad Balancer Architecture

LBClient

Server1

Server2

Server3

A major remaining problem is that the LB becomes a single point of failure (SPOF).

VIPD=VIPS=client

Solutions

Redundant load balancerso E.g., two load balancers

Fully distributed load balancingo e.g., Microsoft Network Load Balancing

Microsoft NLB

No dedicated load balancer All servers in the cluster receive all packets All servers within the cluster simultaneously run

a mapping algorithm to determine which server should handle the packet. Those servers not required to service the packet simply discard it.

Mapping (ranking) algorithm: computing the “winning” server according to host priorities, multicast or unicast mode, port rules, affinity, load percentage distribution, client IP address, client port number, other internal load information

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc739506%28WS.10%29.aspx

Discussion

Compare the design of using Load Balancer vs Microsoft NLB

Forward Cache/Proxy

Web caches/proxy placed at entrance of an ISP

Client sends all http requests to web cache if object at web

cache, web cache immediately returns object in http response

else requests object from origin server, then returns http response to client

client

Proxyserver

client

http request

http re

http response

http re

sponse

http re

sponse

http requesthttp response

origin server

Forward Web Proxy/Cache

Web caches give good performance because very often a single client

repeatedly accesses the same document

a nearby client also accesses the same document

Cache Hit ratio increases logarithmically with number of users

app. server

client 1

client 2 client

ISP cache

client 4

client 5

client 6

ISP cache

Benefits of Forward Web Caching

Assume: cache is “close” to client (e.g., in same network)

smaller response time: cache “closer” to client

decrease traffic to distant servers link out of

institutional/local ISP network often bottleneck

originservers

public Internet

institutionalnetwork 10 Mbps LAN

1.5 Mbps access link

institutionalcache

What Went Wrong with Forward Web Caches? Web protocols evolved extensively to

accommodate caching, e.g. HTTP 1.1 However, Web caching was developed with a

strong ISP perspective, leaving content providers out of the picture It is the ISP who places a cache and controls it ISPs only interest to use Web caches is to reduce

bandwidth

Outline

Load direction/distributiono Basic load direction mechanismso Path properties (to be covered later)o Case studies: Content Distribution

Networks, Akamai, and YouTube

Content Distribution Networks Content Distribution Networks (CDNs)

provide examples of Internet-scale load distribution for content publishers

CDN Design Perspective Performance scalability (high throughput,

going beyond single server throughput) and Geographic scalability (low propagation

latency, going to close-by servers) Low cost operation

Akamai

Akamai – original and largest commercial CDN operates around 91,000 servers in over 1,000 networks in 70 countries

Akamai (AH kuh my) is Hawaiian for intelligent, clever and informally “cool”. Founded Apr 99, Boston MA by MIT students

Akamai evolution:o Files/streaming (our focus at this moment)o Secure pages and whole pageso Dynamic page assembly at the edge (ESI)o Distributed applications

Akamai Scalability Bottleneck

52See Akamai 2009 investor analysts meeting

Basic of Akamai Architecture

Content publisher (e.g., CNN, NYTimes)o provides base HTML documentso runs origin server(s)

Akamai runs o edge servers for hosting content

• Deep deployment into 1000 networks

o customized DNS redirection servers to select edge servers based on

• closeness to client browser• server load

Linking to Akamai

Originally, URL Akamaization of embedded content: e.g.,<IMG SRC= http://www.provider.com/image.gif >

changed to <IMGSRC = http://a661. g.akamai.net/hash/image.gif>

URL Akamaization is becoming obsolete and supported mostly for legacy reasonso Currently most content publishers prefer to use

DNS CNAME to link to Akamai servers• a CNAME is an alias

Note that this DNS redirection unit is per customer, not individual files.

Akamai Load Direction Flow

Internet

Web client

Hierarchy of CDN DNS servers

Customer DNS servers

(5)(6)

LDNSClient requests site

Client gets CNAME entry with domain name in Akamai

Client is given 2 nearby web replica servers (fault tolerance)

Web replica serversMultiple redirections to find nearby edge servers

More details see “Global hosting system”: FT Leighton, DM Lewin – US Patent 6,108,703, 2000.

Exercise: Zoo machine

Check any web page of New York Times and find a page with an image

Find the URL Use %dig +trace +recurse to see Akamai load direction

Akamai Load Direction

Akamai Load Redirection Framework

edge servers

clients

If the directed edge server does not have requested content,the edge server goes back to the original server (source) .

Load Direction Formulation: Input Potential related input:

o p(m, e): path properties (from a client site m to an edge sever e)

• Akamai might use a one-hop detour routing (see akamai-detour.pdf)

o akm: request arrival rate from client site m to

publisher ko uk: service rate for requests for publisher k

o xe: load on edge server eo caching state of a server e

Load Direction Formulation

Details of Akamai algorithms are proprietary

So what we discuss is our formulation and the measurements of some researchers.

akYale ak

Edge servers

Request client sites

Load Direction: Control Parameters Control interval: T Mapping from client

sites to serverso server pool Sm

k(t): the pool of edge servers that can be assigned to client site m to publisher k, at time t

akYale ak

Load Direction: Comments An algorithm (column 12 of Akamai Patent) at

a local DNS servero Compute the load to each publisher k (called serial

number)o Sort the publishers from increasing loado For each publisher, associate a list of random servers

generated by a hash functiono Assign the publisher to the first server that does not

overload

We can formulate more complex versions

Experimental Study of Akamai Load Balancing Methodology

o 2-months long measuremento 140 PlanetLab nodes (clients)

• 50 US and Canada, 35 Europe, 18 Asia, 8 South America, the rest randomly scattered

o Every 20 sec, each client queries an appropriate CNAME for Yahoo, CNN, Fox News, NY Times, etc.

Akamai Low-LevelDNS Server

AkamaiWeb replica 1 Akamai

Web replica 2

AkamaiWeb replica 3

.……

Web client

See http://www.aqualab.cs.northwestern.edu/publications/Ajsu06DBA.pdf

Client 2: Purdue

06/1/05 16:16

Server Pool: to Yahoo

Client 1: Berkeley

Target: a943.x.a.yimg.com (Yahoo)

Server Pool (to Yahoo)

Server Pool: Multiple Akamai Hosted Sites

Clients

Load Balancing Dynamics

Berkeley Brazil

Redirection Effectiveness: Measurement Methodology

Planet Lab Node

Akamai Low-LevelDNS Server

9 Best Akamai Replica Servers………

ping ping ping

Do redirections reveal network conditions?

Rank = r1+r2-1o 16 means perfect correlation o 0 means poor correlation

Brazil is poor

MIT and Amsterdam are excellent

Server Diversity for Yahoo

Good overlay-to-CDN mapping candidates

Majority of PL nodessee between 10 and 50 Akamai edge-servers

Nodes far away from Akamaihot-spots

Akamai Streaming Architecture

A content publisher (e.g., a radio or a TV station) encodes streams and transfer themto entry points

When a user watches a stream from an edge server, the server subscribes to a reflector

Group a set of streams (e.g., some popular some not) into a bucket called a portset. A set ofreflectors will distribute a given portset.

Compare with Web architecture.

Akamai Streaming: Resource Naming

Each unique stream is encoded by an URL called Akamai Resource Locator (ARL)

mms://a1897.l3072828839.c30728.g.lm.akamaistream.net/D/1897/30728/v0001/reflector:28839

Windows

media player

portsetStream ID

LiveMediaservice

Customer# (NBA)

Akamai Streaming Load Direction

From ARL to edge servero Similar to web direction

From edge server to reflectoro if (stream is active) then forward to clientelse if (VoD) then fetch from original serverelse using Akamai DNS to query portset+region code

Streaming Redirection Interval

- 40% use 30 sec- 10% does not have any redirection (default edge server

cluster in Boston 72.246.103.0/24 and 72.247.145.0/24)

Overlapping of Servers

Testing Akamai Streaming Load Balancing

(a) Add 7 probing machines to the same edge server(b) Observe slow down(c) Notice that Akamai removed the edge server from DNS;

probing machines stop 76

You Tube

02/2005: Founded by Chad Hurley, Steve Chen and Jawed Karim, who were all early employees of PayPal.

10/2005: First round of funding ($11.5 M) 03/2006: 30 M video views/day 07/2006: 100 M video views/day 11/2006: acquired by Google 10/2009: Chad Hurley announced in a blog

that YouTube serving well over 1 B video views/day (avg = 11,574 video views /sec )

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6304964351441328559#

Pre-Google Team Size

2 Sysadmins 2 Scalability software architects 2 feature developers 2 network engineers 1 DBA 0 chefs

YouTube Design Flow

while (true){ identify_and_fix_bottlenecks(); drink(); sleep(); notice_new_bottleneck();}

YouTube Major Components

Web servers

Video servers

Thumbnail servers

Database serverso Will cover the social networking/database

bottleneck/consistency issues later in the course

YouTube: Web Servers

Components Netscaler load balancer;

Apache; Python App Servers; Databases

Python Web code (CPU) is not

bottleneck JIT to C to speedup C extensions Pre-generate HTML responses

Development speed more important

NetScaler

Apache

PythonApp Server

Webservers

Databases

YouTube: Video Server

See “Statistics and Social Network of YouTube Videos”, 2008.

YouTube: Video Popularity

How to designa system to handle highly skewed distribution?

YouTube: Video Server Architecture

Tiered architectureo CDN servers (for popular videos)

• Low delay; mostly in-memory operation

o YouTube servers (not popular 1-20 per day)

Request

cs433/533 computer networks lecture 12 cdn 2/16/2012 1

Documents

642-533 exam

uthamapalayam - 625 533

cs433/533: computer networks y. rchard yang 8/29/2013

nf 533 reporting nf 533 reporting nf 533 reporting nf 533...

closer no. 533

u 533 - osti.gov

cs433 modeling and simulation lecture 14 discrete events...

subacute toxicological evaluation of at‑533 and at‑533...

manual camion 533

cs433/533 computer networks lecture 15 intro to transport...

brisa original - ultrafabrics · 533-3277 moon 533-3276...

70-533 microsoft - gratis exam · 70-533 microsoft number...

cs433 modeling and simulation lecture 04 statistical ...

novel and “alternative” parallel programming paradigms...

gm 533 final_prep_2012

cs433/533 computer networks lecture 13 cdn & p2p for...

cache coherence cs433 spring 2001

snippetz_issue 533

dr. anis koubâa cs433 modeling and simulation

brazilian news 533