delaware’s performance appraisal system for administrators dpas 2.5 jacquelyn o. wilson, ed.d....
Post on 04-Jan-2016
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators
DPAS 2.5
Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D.University of Delaware
DirectorDelaware Academy for School Leadership
College of Education and Human Development
Skills and Behaviors
College of Education and Human Development 2
• University Programs• Aspiring Leader
Programs• District Succession
Planning
Professional Development for Licensure Renewal
Delaware Performance Appraisal System for Administrators
College of Education and Human Development 3
• Component 1: Vision and Goals• Component 2: Culture of Learning• Component 3: Management• Component 4: Professional Responsibilities• Component 5: Student Improvement• 360 Survey
Aligned to the ISLLC Standards
College of Education and Human Development4
Delaware Performance Appraisal System
1. Vision & GoalsAssessing dataImplementing vision and goalsPromoting vision and goalsCommunicating vision and goals
2. Culture of LearningAdvocating a culture of learningMonitoring the culture of learningSustaining the culture of learningMaintaining the culture of learning
College of Education and Human Development 5
3. ManagementSolving problems or concernsManaging resourcesComplying with policiesProtecting the welfare and safety of students and staff
4. Professional Responsibilities
Maintaining professional relationshipsPromoting family and community involvementDemonstrating fairnessGrowing and developing professionally
College of Education and Human Development 6
Component 5 (2011-2012)
Showing Student Improvement: Administrator uses school or district goals from the school or district improvement process to set his or her personal annual data-driven goal(s) for student improvement. Data used to establish goals shall include school or district accountability data, State Assessment data, and other assessment data where available.
Measuring Student Improvement: Administrator has specific, measurable evidence to show progress towards or attainment of goal(s) for student improvement.
College of Education and Human Development 7
Implementing Strategies for Student Improvement: Administrator designs and implements appropriate strategies to show progress towards or attainment of goal(s) for student improvement.
Reflecting on Student Improvement: Administrator reflects on goal setting process and outcomes for the purpose of continuous professional improvement and shares student improvement information with other staff as appropriate.
College of Education and Human Development 8
Rating: Superintendents or their designees may set the cut points for individual administrators’ performance ratings (unsatisfactory, effective, and highly effective). Goals, targets, and actual performance data will be recorded under Component 5 in the Summative Evaluation Form.
College of Education and Human Development 9
Component 5 considered “too vague” and was not being implemented equitably across districts
resulting in changes to meet rigor of RTTT
Component 5 considered “too vague” and was not being implemented equitably across districts
resulting in changes to meet rigor of RTTT
2011-2012 2012-2013
Showing Student Improvement School/District-wide DCAS Measures
Measuring Student Improvement
School/District-wide Success Plan Measures
Measuring Strategies for Student Improvement
Reflecting on Student Improvement
College of Education and Human Development 10
2012-2013
School/District-wide DCAS Measures
• Percent of subgroups meeting state and/or district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) for ELA and mathematics under ESEA Flexibility OR
• Percent of subgroups meeting state and/or district AYP targets.
Targets must be aligned with state targets for each subgroup or the school or district’s Success Plan targets (each target may be met using absolute or growth performance – all business rules for AYP apply)
College of Education and Human Development 11
2012-2013
School/District-wide Success Plan Measures
The district has flexibility in determining which School/District-wide Success Plan Measures indicators will be used; however, there shall be at least two measures used. Measures are to be selected from the school or district Success Plan and relevant to the administrator’s responsibilities.
College of Education and Human Development
12
• Starts with Goal Setting and a Review of Data• Strategies• Targets• Evidence
• Formative feedback conferences and progress monitoring throughout year
• 360 Survey administered in Spring DPAS II Delaware e-survey or VAL-ED
• Ends with a summative conference to determine progress on goals and a review of data
College of Education and Human Development 13
Training , Coaching & Monitoring
College of Education and Human Development 14
Stakeholder involvement throughout the design and implementation process of a
principal evaluation system
College of Education and Human Development 15
College of Education and Human Development
16
• Pilot the system
• Collect regular feedback from participants using an external evaluator….. and make changes if necessary based on the feedback to improve the system
Select measures that are: rigorous but fairdirectly tied to the work of the principalEncourages professional growth
College of Education and Human Development 17
College of Education and Human Development 18
Implications of Data Collection
PRINCIPALS NEED TRAINING
College of Education and Human Development 19
Contact Information
Jacquelyn O. Wilson302-855-1621 (office)302-547-0043 (cell)
Email jowilson@udel.edu
http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml
College of Education and Human Development 20
top related