e learning fitness methodologies & technologies uniroma1 marco temperini
Post on 18-Nov-2014
767 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
1/9
eLearning Metodologies & Technologies
Marco Temperini
eLearning Fitness
www.elearningfitness.eu
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
2/9
eLF – elearning Methodologies & Technologies
eLF: A hybrid system composed by web-based subsystems
designed to comply with … the aims
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
3/9
- elearning Personalization- Social and collaborative elearning- Standards for e-learning- LMSs (with René )
elearning M&T issues
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
4/9
- Student model = {what she knows, how well, what are the learning preferences}- the course is personalized to the individual model
TKSK
initial knowledge
knowledge imparted by the course
target knowledge
elearning personalization - 1/2
knowledge domain KD
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
5/9
- very dynamic management of the LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORY
- Course = {set of learning objects}- sometimes a sequence: LOS = {LO1, ..., LOn}- sometimes something less organized - conditions to step from a LO to the “next”
- The course is adapted to learner’s progress
- CHANGES in Content / ways of moving through LOs
elearning personalization - 2/2
This is research work
LMSs are immature in this respect;
We have prototypes and not production platforms
Learning content construction needs care …
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
6/9
Vygotskij (1978): learning happens through social interaction in the ZPD
APS: Autonomous Problem SolvingZPD: Zone of Proximal DevelopmentUPS: Unreachable Problem Solving
Social Collaborative elearning (one way to see it) - 1/2
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
7/9
Students cooperate on learning activities (indirectly and directly)
Social interaction through discussions and FAQ Products (e.g. solutions for exercises) are reused and peer evaluated Group projects are managed with interactions between groups
Peer and self assessment of groups Students gain reputation, which is made of:
Involvement - Usefulness Competence - Critical appraisal Judgment - Self judgment Group reputation
Social Collaborative elearning (one way to see it) - 2/2
Basically … same conclusion as earlier
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
8/9
Need for it, to foster Reuse, Durability, Interoperability, Accessibility
of learning objects
- Learning object = learning content and activities, plus their “specification”
- They are modular (more or less “finely grained”)- They can be grouped to make lessons, modules, courses- They are … Java applet, Flash animation, audio/video clip,
web page, pdf documents, ppt/odp, doc/odt (office/openOffice documents)
through standard functionalities (API) of the LMSs- There are services in the LMS, to administer learning
objects during the course (activate, present, let interact, join in sequences, make available on conditions …)
Standards for e-Learning – 1/2
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
9/9
An LMS that has the services to manage standard-defined learning objects and … things is a Standard Compliant LMSs
Suitable authoring systems (not necessarily embedded in LMSs) allow to build standard learning objects (…and things)
SCORM- is a standard; as well as IMS, LOM, AICC, Dubliln Core, Ariadne …- Following it a learning object can be
- Specified (wrapping one or more learning resources/contents)- Joined with other learning objects to build a package- (a lesson; and lessons compose modules, that compose courses that …)
its components- Content Aggregation Model (CAM): the format of things- RunTime Env. (RTE): content behavior/treatment in the LMSs- Sequencing and Navigation (SN): the student travel through the
course’s LOs
Standards for e-Learning – 2/2
Making eLF “modules” as (collection of) standard learning objects makes them independent of platform
(well, if it is a compliant LMS);
an authoring tool should be used for our learning objects ( with assistance)
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
10/9
Conclusion of the first part …We can do very good job with some (not too much on
the frontier) tools (CMS, LMS, …)
eLF – elearning Methodologies & Technologies
E-L Registry
Social information exchange
Free access information
LMSCMS
Augmented CMS
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
11/9
10 minutes – We have to ...1) design the portal and the subsystems
- on the basis of requisites coming from …- what can be done by whom?- Feasibility of the application mentioned, for the
LMS/CMS roles?2) Implement a prototype - What can be done by whom3) Create a workflow, to feed the portal with
- Information- Learning content for the eL- Information for the Registry
4) Support a pre-experimental phase, to finalize implementations5) Support the pilots
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
12/9
10 minutes – We need1) Deeper presentation of the partners, to confirm or spot roles2) Consideration of the dependencies on
- WP5: they manage the integration of learning content in the LMS, and the definition of courses: Do they have requisites for us? What interaction with them?
- WP4: they are interested in the authoring factors. Do they have requisites for us? What interaction with them?
- WP6: requisites for the Registry design &implementation- WP7: do we need to state criteria for them to evaluate
the portal?- WP8: They have access to the information delivery
areas. Do they have requisites for us? What interaction with them?
(ambassadors)
2011.02.3/5 Project eLF --- elearning methodologies and technologies --- Marco Temperini
13/9
10 minutes – Agenda for the 75 minutes1) Other initiatives known?2) Suggestions about software applications that may be used
for the portal
3) Description sheets (to devise now and collect later)1) for the suggestions about software, to prepare a decision2) Sufficiently advanced requisites for e-L, after
consultation 3) Idem for Registry
4) Localization related issues1) What for e-L, besides translation2) Idem for the Registry (and that’s probably more crucial)
top related