educ6353 topic 5

EDUC6353 Leading and Managing Educational Change

Topic 5: Educational Change in AustraliaAAcknowledgement: Jennifer Clements

1

OutlineIntroductionInnovation and Best Practice ProjectIDEAS and RAISeChange at Rooty Hill High SchoolPresent context Reflection

2

3

Beliefs and understandings

For consideration – design for improving learning outcomes

Adapted from Figure 1. General design for improving learning outcomes(Hill & Crévola, 1999, p. 3)

Innovation and Best Practice Project

107 schools (government, Catholic and independent)Purpose:

• “to understand how schools respond to both internal and external sources of pressure and support to improve learning

• and the nature of the evidence they can provide about the improvement of learning outcomes” (Cuttance & Stokes, 2001, p. 18)

4

Innovation and Best Practice Project (cont’d)

School management of project:• Developed the innovation (= practical action to resolve problems) (Cuttance & Stokes, 2001, p. 3)

• Controlled funds• Selected consultant researcher• Monitored the quality of the research support provided

Time constrained for demonstrating improved student outcomes

• Changes in teachers’ strategies and professional learning

5

Innovation and Best Practice Project (cont’d)

• Findings (Cuttance & Stokes, 2001, pp. 23f)

• Critical role of leadership “focused on action, culture-building and organisation-wide learning” (p. 26)

• Association between extent of innovation and degree of self-management in the school systems

• “The significant deficit of data analysis skills in schools across the nation” (p. 27)

• “Teacher-based research and evaluation of their practice is a necessary component of successful school innovation” (p. 28).

6

IDEAS and RAISeRefer to previous discussion on the IDEAS project (Topic 3)The article by Wildy & Faulkner (2008) is included for those who would like to

• read more about IDEAS• follow up on school improvement in literacy achievement (RAISe)

7

Change at Rooty Hill High School1997 – present - 3 phases

Phase 1 (1997-1998) (Cawsey, 2002, pp. 73-76)• Definition of school’s Learning Principles (core values) by a conference of students, parents and staff

• statement of purpose• Analysis of culture

• Artefacts changes in ‘little’ things that people notice

• Socio-facts – e.g. teaching and learning framework, outcomes-based assessment, technology

8

Change at Rooty Hill High School (cont’d)

Phase 2 (1999-2000) (Cawsey, 2002, pp. 76-80)

• Emphasis on values• “At RHHS we absolutely believe that students need a rigorous academic curriculum complemented by an integrated program of social development” (p. 76).

• Community conference identified desirable exit behaviours portfolio project

• Skills for lifelong learning, individual achievement, and living in a civil society (pp. 76-77)

9

Change at Rooty Hill High School (cont’d)

Phase 3 (2001-2002) (Cawsey, 2002, pp. 80-82)

• Approach to behaviour and discipline• Based on collection of data over 5 years (QSLS) + portfolios

• 30 teachers trained in Choice Theory and Reality Therapy (Glasser)

• Community conference – quality behaviour• “Schools need to be able to teach students about values and about how to behave for success” (p. 81).

• “The deepest levels of learning occur at the level of values” (p. 82).

10

Change at Rooty Hill High School (cont’d)

Positive outcomes for students:• Social outcomes (Cawsey, 2002, p. 79)• Academic performance (Anderson & Cawsey, 2008, p. 53)

Leadership:• “…principals must have the courage to articulate their own values and beliefs in support of improving education for students” (Cawsey, 2002, p. 83)

Journey messy and difficult (p. 77)

11

Australia: Present ContextSchools:

• Education Revolution (ER) 2008• NAPLAN• My School website• New Australian Curriculum for Kindergarten to Year 10

• Technology to schools• National Teaching Professional Framework• National Partnerships• Monetary rewards for expert teachers and schools• Local Schools Local Decisions• Australian Professional Standards for Teachers

12

Australia: Present Context (cont’d)Higher Education (Bradley Review, 2008)

• Transforming Australia’s HE System (Commonwealth of Australia, 2009)

• $5.4 billion over 4 years• Support high quality teaching and learning• Improve access and outcomes for students from low socio economic backgrounds

• Build new links between universities and disadvantaged schools

• Rewards for meeting quality and equity outcomes• Improve resourcing for research and invest in world class tertiary education infrastructure

13

Australia: Present Context (cont’d)

Higher Education (Harvey & Kamvounias, 2008) • Teacher-as-learner approach to implementation of teaching and learning policy – focus on students

• A positive and well-intentioned initiative had a minimal effect on teaching and learning practice and student learning.

• Need for a more integrated approach to teaching and learning changes in higher education context

14

Australia: Present Context (cont’d)

Early Childhood• Early Childhood Development Strategy (2009-2020) (DEEWR, 2011)

• Australian Government working with states and territories to develop a national Early Years Development Workforce Strategy

• Aim: to improve supply and quality of early childhood education and care workforce

• Best Practice Guidelines for the Planning and Development of Child Care Facilities – surveys completed July 2013

15

Features of Sustainable ChangeFocus on improving teaching and learningReform agenda appropriate to the schoolTeachers direct the change process in a community of trust and collaborationData are used to guide changes in pedagogyA long term perspective is taken (5-7 years)School leaders guide the innovation

(Fullan, 2011; Goodson, 2001; Hargreaves, 2010; Louis, 2007; Meiers & Ingvarson, 2005; Smith, 2008)

16

17

Anderson, M., & Cawsey, C. (2008). Learning for leadership: Building a school of professional practice. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Cawsey, C. (2002). Naming, measuring and modelling the values of public education. In S. Pascoe (Ed.), Values in education: College year book 2002 (pp. 71-84). Deakin West, A.C.T.: Australian College of Educators.

Commonwealth of Australia (2009). Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Barton, ACT: Australian Government.

Cuttance, P., & Stokes, S. A. (2001). Innovation and best practice. In P. Cuttance & Innovation and Best Practice Consortium (Eds.), School innovation: Pathway to the knowledge society (pp. 1-29). Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (2011). Early childhood workforce. Retrieved August 20, 2012, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Earlychildhood/Policy_Agenda/EarlyChildhoodWorkforce/Pages/home.aspx

Harvey, A., & Kamvounias, P. (2007). Bridging the implementation gap: A teacher‐as‐learner approach to teaching and learning policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 31-41. Hill, P. W., &

Hill, P. W., & Crévola, C. A. (1999). Key features of a whole-school, design approach to literacy teaching in schools. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 4(3), 5-11.

Wildy, H., & Faulkner, J. (2008). Whole school improvement Australian-style: What do IDEAS and RAISe offer? Leading and Managing, 14(2), 83-96.

References