elara neighbourhood centre...the proposed works consist of the construction of a new supermarket,...
Post on 13-Jul-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Elara Neighbourhood Centre
Stormwater Management Plan
8 December 2017
Stockland Development Pty Ltd 388057
388057 SW01 D P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04
Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Mott MacDonald
Mott MacDonald 383 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box Q1678, QVB Sydney, NSW 1230 Australia T +61 (0)2 9098 6800 F +61 (0)2 9098 6810 mottmac.com
Stockland Development Pty Ltd Level 25, 133 Castlereagh Street, Sydney 2000, Australia
Elara Neighbourhood Centre
Stormwater Management Plan
8 December 2017
Mott MacDonald Australia Pty Limited is a subsidiary of Mott MacDonald International Limited. Registered in Australia, ABN 13 134 120 353
Stockland Development Pty Ltd 388057
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Issue and Revision Record
Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description
A 18.10.17 C. Keenan N. McKee J. Gilligan Issued for Client Review
B 07.11.17 C. Keenan S. Reilly B. Soo Issued for Client Review
C 10.11.17 C. Keenan S. Reilly B. Soo Issued for DA Approval
D 08.12.17 J. Ellero S. Reilly B. Soo Issued for DA Approval
Document reference: 388057 | SW01 | D
Information class: Standard
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-
captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.
We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being
used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied
to us by other parties.
This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other
parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
This report has been pr epared sol el y for use by the party which commissi oned it (the ‘Client’) i n connecti on with the capti oned proj ect. It should not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party who has expressl y agreed t er ms of r eliance with us (the ‘Reci pient(s)’) may rel y on the content, i nformati on or any vi ews expressed i n the repor t. We accept no duty of care, responsi bility or liability to any other r eci pient of thi s document. This r eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etar y intell ectual property.
No representati on, warranty or under taki ng, expr ess or i mplied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Cli ent or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this r eport. For the avoidance of doubt this r eport does not in any way purport to i nclude any legal , insur ance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion.
We disclai m all and any liability whether arising i n tort or contrac t or other wise which it might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in r espect of this report , or any infor mation attri buted to i t.
We accept no r esponsibility for any error or omission i n the r eport which is due to an error or omission i n data, infor mation or statements supplied to us by other par ties incl udi ng the client (‘D ata’). We have not i ndependentl y verified such D ata and have assumed it to be accurate, complete, reli abl e and current as of the date of such infor mation.
Forecasts presented i n this document were pr epared usi ng Data and the report is dependent or based on D ata. Inevitabl y, some of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances may occur. C onsequentl y M ott MacDonal d does not guarantee or warr ant the concl usi ons contained i n the repor t as there are li kel y to be differ ences between the for ecas ts and the ac tual results and those di ffer ences may be material. Whil e we consi der that the infor mation and opini ons gi ven i n this r eport are sound all parti es must rel y on their own skill and j udgement when making use of it .
Under no circumstances may this report or any extr act or summar y ther eof be used in connection wi th any public or pri vate securities offering i ncluding any rel ated memorandum or prospectus for any securities offering or stock exchange listing or announcement.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 The Physical Environment 2
2.1 Site Description and Proposed Works 2
2.2 Data 3
2.2.1 Topography 3
2.2.2 Rainfall Data 3
3 Design Controls & Reference Documents 4
3.1 Design Controls 4
3.2 Reference Documents 4
4 Soil and Water Management Plan 5
5 Stormwater Management 6
5.1 Water Quantity Management 6
5.1.1 Stormwater Drainage 6
5.1.2 On-Site Detention 6
5.2 Water Quantity Modelling 6
5.2.1 Model Parameters 6
5.2.2 Existing System 7
5.2.3 Proposed System 8
5.2.4 DRAINS Results 9
5.3 Water Quality Management 10
5.3.1 Water Quality Objective 10
5.3.2 Proposed Treatments 10
5.4 Water Quality Modelling 14
5.4.1 MUSIC Model – Parameters and Methodology 14
5.4.2 MUSIC Results 17
5.5 Stream Erosion Index Modelling 18
5.5.1 Parameters and Methodology 18
6 Staging 22
Appendices 23
A. DRAINS Input Data 24
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
B. 6-month ARI DRAINS Results 25
C. 10yr ARI DRAINS Results 26
D. 100yr ARI DRAINS Results 27
E. DRAINS Catchment Plan 28
F. MUSIC Catchment Plan 29
G. HumeCeptor Brochure 30
H. SPELFilter Brochure 31
I. SPEL StormSack Brochure 32
J. MUSIC Link Results 33
K. Landscaping Rainwater Reuse Plan 34
L. Council Correspondence 35
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 1 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
1 Introduction
Mott MacDonald has been commissioned by Stockland Development Pty Ltd to prepare this
Stormwater Management Plan for the proposed development known as Elara Neighbourhood
Centre, identified as Lots 1101 & 1102 DP1191303 Elara Boulevard, Marsden Park. This report
will be lodged with Blacktown City Council to support a Development Application for the
development of a neighbourhood centre and details the modelling procedures and results
obtained in developing the proposed water cycle management plan.
The advice outlined in this report and documented on Mott MacDonald drawings 388057-MMD-
DA-XX-DR-C-0001 to 0210, aims to address the following engineering components:
● Understand the existing stormwater flow conditions for the site and determine requirements
for post-development flows from regulatory authorities;
● Design of the stormwater pipe network to convey flows through the site to appropriate
discharge points including connecting to the existing network, where applicable;
● Assess the safety of the overland flows throughout the site; and
● Identify appropriate measures to satisfy Council’s water quality and quantity requirements
and determine the location and land area required to implement the measures.
The following analyses have taken into consideration the economical, engineering,
environmental and social aspects of the works throughout the implementation of appropriate
stormwater controls and best management practices.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 2 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
2 The Physical Environment
2.1 Site Description and Proposed Works
The subject site is located approximately 40km to the north-west of the Sydney Central
Business District at the intersection of Elara Boulevard and Northbourne Drive, Marsden Park,
and falls within the Blacktown City Council (BCC) Local Government Area (LGA).
The development site covers an area of approximately 2.53 Ha and forms part of the Marsden
Park Precinct. The Marsden Park Precinct was one of two developments to advance under the
New South Wales Government’s Precinct Acceleration Protocol in July 2011. The site Master
Plan was adopted by the Minister for Planning in October 2013.
The Marsden Park Precinct has three major land owners (Stockland, Winten Property Group,
and Pace) and some smaller fragmented ownership. The Stockland site was the first area to be
redeveloped with the intent to deliver approximately 2400 dwellings. The first parcel of the
Stockland site to be redeveloped is known as Marsden Park Precinct 1 (MPP1); the Elara
Neighbourhood Centre falls into the MPP1 area. Cardno prepared the MPP1 subdivision.
The existing site, which is vacant with light vegetation only, generally falls in a north-west to
south-east direction, towards Harvest Street and Parish street. The proposed site is bound by:
● Elara Boulevard to the north;
● Harvest Street to the south;
● Parish Street to the east; and
● Northbourne Drive to the west.
Figure 1: Existing Site
Source: Nearmap.com.au
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 3 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
The proposed works consist of the construction of a new supermarket, medical centre, childcare
centre, community centre, gym, town plaza, retail space, associated carparking facilities. The
site is currently divided into two lots which are to be consolidated as part of this DA submission.
2.2 Data
2.2.1 Topography
Topographic information for the site was obtained from detailed survey data prepared by Craig
and Rhodes Land Surveyors. Reference: Craig and Rhodes Drawings 108-12G V08 [00] Sheets
1 to 5.
2.2.2 Rainfall Data
Rainfall Intensity-Frequency-Duration (IFD) data obtained from Blacktown City Council’s
Engineering Guide for Development 2005 was utilised for the subject site.
Table 1: Rainfall Intensities for Blacktown City Council
DURATION 5 YEAR
(mm/hr)
10 YEAR
(mm/hr)
20 YEAR
(mm/hr)
100 YEAR
(mm/hr)
5 mins 129.0 146.0 168.0 219.0
10 mins 98.0 111.0 128.0 167.0
15 mins 82.0 93.0 107.0 139.0
20 mins 71.0 81.0 93.0 121.0
30 mins 58.0 65.0 75.0 98.0
45 mins 46.2 52.0 60.0 78.0
1 hour 39.2 44.1 51.0 66.0
1.5 hours 30.7 34.6 39.8 52.0
2 hours 25.7 29.0 33.4 43.4
3 hours 20.0 22.6 26.0 33.8
Source: Blacktown City Council’s Engineering Guide for Development 2005
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 4 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
3 Design Controls & Reference Documents
3.1 Design Controls
The stormwater drainage for the proposed development has been designed to comply with the
following guidelines:
● Australian Rainfall and Runoff 2001;
● Blacktown City Council’s Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2016;
● Blacktown City Council’s Development Control Plan 2015;
● Blacktown City Council’s Engineering Guide for Development 2005;
● Blacktown City Council’s Developer Handbook for Water Sensitive Urban Design 2013;
● Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction, Volume 1, 4th Edition, March 2004;
and
● Australian Design Standards.
3.2 Reference Documents
This report should be read in conjunction with the following documents related to the Elara
Neighbourhood Centre and the Marsden Park Precinct (MPP1):
● Civil engineering drawings prepared by Mott MacDonald dated 16/10/2017;
● Architectural drawings prepared for DA submission by Allen Jack + Cottier;
● Landscape architectural drawings prepared for DA submission by Group GSA;
● Engineering Services and Civil Infrastructure Report – Proposed Residential Subdivision –
MPP1, Marsden Park prepared by Cardno dated August 2014;
● Cardno Drawings Cardno UT-CV-ST01 series dated June 2014; and
● Other reports, plans and documentation prepared by specialist consultants (as applicable).
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 5 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
4 Soil and Water Management Plan
Prior to any earthworks commencing on site, soil and water management measures are to be
planned and implemented generally in accordance with Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and
Construction 4th Edition, March 2004. These measures may include:
● Installation of geo-textile filter fabric to the perimeter of the work site area, where required;
● The provision of a sediment basin through which stormwater runoff shall be channelled and
treated during construction;
● The use of flow diversion and sediment control methods to minimise the quantity of sediment
entering the stormwater drainage system using sandbags around kerb inlet pits and geo-
textile filter fabric around drop inlet pits etc.;
● Sediment control devices at all ingress / egress points;
● The provision of a temporary truck wash down facility to service vehicles exiting the site
during the construction stage.
Please refer to the Concept Soil and Water Management Plan 388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-
0020.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 6 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
5 Stormwater Management
5.1 Water Quantity Management
5.1.1 Stormwater Drainage
The major/ minor approach to stormwater drainage is the recognised concept for urban
catchments within the Blacktown City Council Local Government Area. For the purposes of this
report, DRAINS software is used to calculate flows exiting the site. The minor drainage system
is designed to contain stormwater flows from the minor 10yr ARI storm event within a below
ground pit and pipe network.
The major drainage system incorporates overland flow routes through proposed road,
hardstand, and landscaped areas for the 100-year ARI design storm event with due
consideration for higher intensity storms. In accordance with council’s requirements, the major
drainage system is to be designed in a manner that ensures that personal safety is not
compromised. As such, all overland flow routes for the site are to be designed so that the
maximum velocity x depth product shall not exceed 0.4m2/s in accordance with Council’s
guidelines.
5.1.2 On-Site Detention
Review of the Engineering Services and Civil Infrastructure Report and civil engineering
drawings (CardnoUT-CV-ST01 series) prepared by Cardno for the MPP1 subdivision indicates
that regional stormwater detention was designed to cater for this subdivision.
Furthermore, review of Cardno’s 12d model for the MPP1 subdivision indicates that the Elara
Neighbourhood Centre site was assumed to be 100% impervious when calculating stormwater
flows and sizing regional detention basins.
Therefore, and as confirmed with Blacktown City Council, on-site detention is not required for
the Elara Neighbourhood Centre site. Please refer to Appendix L for correspondence with
Council regarding on-site detention.
5.2 Water Quantity Modelling
A hydrological model for the Elara Neighbourhood Centre site was formulated using the
DRAINS software package and was analysed to assess the performance of the site stormwater
network. The DRAINS program typically performs design and analysis calculations for urban
stormwater systems and models the flood behaviour on both rural and urban catchments.
The user data inputs required by DRAINS include catchment areas, time of concentration,
pervious and impervious areas, IFD rainfall intensities and flow path roughness.
5.2.1 Model Parameters
In order to assess the performance of the proposed site pit and pipe network, a DRAINS model
was established with the input parameters, described below:
5.2.1.1 Hydrological Model
● Rational method procedure = ARR87
● Paved (impervious) area depression storage = 1 mm
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 7 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
● Supplementary area depression storage = 1 mm
● Grassed (pervious) area depression storage = 5 mm
● Soil type - normal = 3
● Sag pit blocking factor (minor systems) = 0 (no blockage)
● On grade pit blocking factor (minor systems) = 0 (no blockage)
● Sag pit blocking factor (major systems) = 0.5 (50% blockage)
● On grade pit blocking factor (major systems) = 0.2 (20% blockage)
● Antecedent Moisture Condition (ARI = 1-5 years) = 2.5
● Antecedent Moisture Condition (ARI = 10-20 years) = 3.0
● Antecedent Moisture Condition (ARI = 50-100 years) = 3.5
DRAINS user guide describes soil type 3 as follows:
Type 3 (or C) slow infiltration rates (may have layers that impede downward movement
of water).
Design storms using IFD data obtained from Blacktown City Council’s Engineering Guide for
Development 2005 were entered into DRAINS for the following durations for the 3 month, 6
month, 5 year, 10 year, 20 year, 50 year and 100 year ARI storm events:
● Storm Durations: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minute.
5.2.2 Existing System
The existing site has been designed to grade to the eastern boundary of the site towards the
intersection of Parish Street and Harvest Street. In the existing scenario, stormwater is
informally sheeting off the site onto the road reserve where it is collected by stormwater pits in
Parish Street and Harvest Street.
Review of Cardno Drawings Cardno UT-CV-ST01 series dated June 2014 indicates that in order
to undertake their design, Cardno split the site into three catchments and provided three capped
stormwater pipes for future connection to service the Elara neighbourhood Centre site.
The western catchment is 0.953Ha in size with a Ø675 stormwater pipe provided for future
connection with a downstream invert level of RL25.42. The central catchment is the smallest of
the three catchments with an area of 0.455Ha, a Ø450 stormwater pipe has been provided for
future connection with a downstream invert level of RL25.06. The eastern catchment is the
largest of the three catchments with an area of 1.110Ha, a Ø675 stormwater pipe has been
provided for future connection with a downstream invert level of RL24.29.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 8 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Figure 2: Catchment Plan
5.2.3 Proposed System
The DRAINS model for the proposed scenario was developed based on the following
methodology:
● The site pit and pipe network is proposed to connect to the existing 675m, 450mm and
675mm diameter stormwater stubs located in the Harvest Street boundary of the
development as per the subdivision design prepared by Cardno;
● An indicative pit and pipe network was developed for the proposed siteworks (refer civil
engineering plans 388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0050 to 0053 for details);
● Tailwater conditions at the connection to the existing stormwater pipe stubs in the Harvest
Street boundary were taken from Cardno’s Marsden Park Stages 1-4 & 11 of Precinct 1
(CardnoUT-CV-ST01) drawings and are provided in Table 2 below;
● These tailwater levels have been specified to simulate a charged system downstream and to
verify the capacity of the internal piped network for stormwater flows generated during the
design storm events;
● Roof water from the new buildings is to drain directly to rainwater harvesting tanks totalling
230.4kL of storage with overflows to the piped network. Designs for roof drainage shall be
undertaken as either conventional or siphonic drainage by a certified Hydraulic Engineer
during the detail design stage of the works;
● For the purposes of DRAINS modelling, the rainwater tanks are considered full during
simulation;
● The pit and pit network within the childcare centre has been designed to convey the 100yr
ARI storm event with due consideration for higher intensity design storms;
● All paved areas are collected within grated pits and drains;
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 9 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
● 10yr and 100yr ARI events were considered for all standard durations; and
● For the major system (100yr ARI storm event), blockage factors of 20% and 50% have been
applied to on-grade pits and sag pits respectively in accordance with Council’s requirements.
Refer to Appendix A for DRAINS input data.
Table 2: Tailwater Levels
Storm Event Western Outlet Central Outlet Eastern Outlet
10yr ARI RL26.160 RL25.962 RL25.178
100yr ARI RL27.338 RL26.870 RL25.860
Figure 3: DRAINS Model
Source: Labels have not been shown for clarity
5.2.4 DRAINS Results
Iterations were performed in the DRAINS model to determine the size of the proposed piped
network in order to satisfy major/minor system requirements in accordance with Blacktown City
Council standards.
Results indicate that the major / minor system requirements are satisfied at all proposed pits in
the development area and that the piped system sufficiently conveys minor storm flows with
safe provision for major system flows (refer to Appendix B, C & D for DRAINS results). Please
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 10 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
refer to drawings 388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0050 to 0053 for the stormwater pit and pipe
network plan and Appendix E for the DRAINS catchment plan.
5.3 Water Quality Management
The stormwater management systems for the site shall comply with Part J of Blacktown City
Council’s Development Control Plan 2015 for the developed site prior to discharge into the
authorities’ drainage system from the site during the construction phase.
Pollutant indicators are categorised as follows:
● Gross pollutants;
● Coarse, medium, and fine sediments;
● Oil and grease;
● Heavy metals; and
● Nutrients.
5.3.1 Water Quality Objective
In accordance with Blacktown City Council’s Development Control Plan, we note that the
following targets have been set in relation to stormwater quality for the post-developed scenario:
1. Reduction in average annual gross pollutants (GP) export load of 90%
2. Reduction in average annual total suspended solids (SS) export load of 85%
3. Reduction annual average total phosphorus (TP) export load of 65%
4. Reduction in annual average total nitrogen (TN) export load of 45%
In addition to satisfying the requirements of Blacktown City Council’s DCP, the promotion of
sustainable water practices must comply with the protection or enhancement of natural water
quality as stated in Council’s Local Environment Plan and pre-DA meeting minutes C17/36783.
The stormwater system has been designed to treat the 6-month ARI storm event in accordance
with Blacktown City Council requirements.
To demonstrate compliance with these objectives, treatment removal loads were analysed using
MUSIC (Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation) Version 6.2.1 software.
Model development and results are discussed below.
5.3.2 Proposed Treatments
Proposed stormwater quality treatment devices such as grassed swales, SPEL StormSack pit
inserts, SPELFilter filter cartridges, Humeceptor hydrodynamic separators and rainwater tanks
are discussed below (refer to Product Specifications in the appendices for further details):
5.3.2.1 Grassed Swale
A grassed swale is a graded and engineered landscape feature appearing as a linear, shallow,
open channel with trapezoidal or parabolic shape. The swale is vegetated with flood tolerant,
erosion resistant plants.
The design of grassed swales promotes the conveyance of storm water at a slower, controlled
rate and acts as a filter medium removing pollutants and allowing stormwater infiltration.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 11 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
In swales, stormwater is slowed by strategic placement of check-dams that encourage ponding
and these ponds in turn facilitate water quality improvements through infiltration, filtration, and
sedimentary deposition.
Two swales are proposed to aid with water quality treatment for the proposed Elara
Neighbourhood Centre development. It is proposed to construct the first swale along Harvest
Street frontage and this swale will treat a landscaped area of 200m2. The second swale is
proposed in the landscaped area adjacent to Parish Street and will treat an area of 140m2.
The following parameters were input into the MUSIC model to represent the proposed swales:
Table 3: Swale MUSIC Input Parameters
Swale Length (m)
Bed Slope (%)
Base Width (m)
Top Width (m)
Depth (m)
Vegetation Height (m)
Exfiltration Rate (mm/hr)
1 90 1.4 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.25 0
2 55 1.5 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.25 0
5.3.2.2 Hydrodynamic Separator – HumeCeptor & MultiCeptor
Hydrodynamic separators are flow-through structures with a settling or separation unit to
remove sediments and other pollutants that are widely used in storm water treatment. No
outside power source is required, because the energy of the flowing water allows the sediments
to efficiently separate. Depending on the type of unit, this separation may be by means of swirl
action or indirect filtration. Refer to Appendix G for the HumeCeptor System Technical Manual.
In developing the MUSIC model for the site, one HumeCeptor and two MultiCeptor type
hydrodynamic separators are proposed upstream of the SPELFilter filtration cartridges to
provide pre-treatment. The following HumeCeptor / MultiCeptor hydrodynamic separators were
utilised:
1. Western Catchment: An “online” MultiCeptor system by Humes with a treatable flow
rate of 94L/s has been proposed;
2. Central Catchment: An “online” HumeCeptor system by Humes with a treatable flow
rate of 93L/s has been proposed;
3. Eastern Catchment: An “online” MultiCeptor system by Humes with a treatable flow rate
of 161L/s has been proposed.
The expected removal rates that were utilised within the water quality modelling process to
represent the HumeCeptor / MultiCeptor units were modelled based on the following
manufacturer’s specifications:
Table 4: Humes HumeCeptor / MultiCeptor MUSIC Input Parameters
Pollutant Input Output Adopted Rate
Suspended Solids (mg/L) 500.3 100.3 79.95%
Phosphorous (mg/L) 4.998 3.519 29.59%
Nitrogen (mg/L) 5 3.5 30.00%
Gross Pollutants (kg/ML) 15.1 14.9 1.32%
Source: Humes
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 12 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
5.3.2.3 SPELFilter Cartridges
Filtration cartridges in the form of SPELFilters are to be provided as an end of line treatment
device to treat stormwater runoff from the proposed development. The SPELFilter system
targets a full range of pollutants including total suspended solids, soluble heavy metals, oil and
grease, and total nutrients.
The SPELFilter cartridges are available in two sizes; 780mm high (standard) and 570mm high
(low). The standard cartridges are used to treat runoff from the western and central catchments
and the low cartridges are used to treat the eastern catchment.
The standard cartridge has a treatable flow rate of 2.83L/s and the low cartridge has a treatable
flow rate of 1.41L/s. The cartridges are designed to capture and treat the “first flush” volume of a
rainfall event. Please refer to Appendix H for the SPELFilter technical manual.
The expected removal rates that were utilised in the water quality modelling process to
represent the pollutant filters were based on manufacturer’s specifications as follows:
Table 5: SPELFilter MUSIC Input Parameters
Pollutant Input Output Adopted Rate
Suspended Solids (mg/L) 1000 200 80%
Phosphorous (mg/L) 10 4.5 55%
Nitrogen (mg/L) 100 58 42%
Gross Pollutants (kg/ML) 100 5 95%
Source: SPEL
In developing the MUSIC model for the proposed works, the following SPELFilter cartridge
systems were utilised:
1. Western Catchment: An “online” 8 x 780mm cartridge system by SPEL with a treatable
flow rate of 22.64 L/s has been proposed as an end-of-line treatment prior to discharge;
2. Central Catchment: An “online” 2 x 780mm cartridge system by SPEL with a treatable
flow rate of 5.66 L/s has been proposed as an end-of-line treatment prior to discharge;
3. Eastern Catchment: An “online” 18 x 570mm cartridge system by SPEL with a treatable
flow rate of 25.38 L/s has been proposed as an end-of-line treatment prior to discharge.
The positions of these SPELFilter units have been proposed to maximise flows and allow easy
access for maintenance.
5.3.2.4 SPEL StormSack Pit Inserts
The grated drain pit T1 at the south of the central catchment has been designed to be fitted with
a StormSack pit inserts including oil absorbent media. The pit insert will sit beneath the
stormwater pit grate and grated drain inlet and will collect gross pollutants and larger sediments
prior discharge to Council’s stormwater network.
The expected removal rates that were utilised in the water quality modelling process to
represent the SPEL StormSack pit insert were based on the following manufacturer’s
specifications as provided in Table 6 below. Please refer to Appendix I for the SPEL StormSack
technical manual.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 13 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Table 6: SPEL StormSack MUSIC Input Parameters
Pollutant Input Output Adopted Rate
Suspended Solids (mg/L) 1000 680 32%
Phosphorous (mg/L) 10 6.2 38%
Nitrogen (mg/L) 100 63 37%
Gross Pollutants (kg/ML) 1000 100 90%
Source: SPEL
5.3.2.5 Rainwater Tanks
Rainwater tanks have been utilised as a means of water reuse within the Elara Neighbourhood
Centre development. Stormwater that discharges directly from roofed areas is generally
considered 'clean' water, with the roof water from the buildings modelled to discharge directly to
four rainwater harvesting tanks. These tanks are used to store water for re-use associated with
the site.
In accordance with Council requirements, a minimum of 80% of non-potable water demand is to
be met through the reuse of rainwater assessed by MUSIC. The 80% reuse was assessed
using the node water balance function within MUSIC using Blacktown’s standard rainfall.
Non-potable water demand includes landscape watering and toilet/urinal flushing for staff and
students. A usage rate of 0.035kL per day internal use per toilet (3.5L per flush, considering 10
flushes per day) was adopted in accordance with the usage rates specified by toilet
manufacturer. Urinals have not been included in the rainwater tank calculations as non-flushing
urinals are proposed for the development. A usage rate of 0.3kL per year per m2 was adopted
for the subsurface irrigation, in accordance with Blacktown City Council’s Developer Handbook
for WSUD.
All facilities except the childcare centre operate 7 days a week; the childcare centre operates 5
days a week. Therefore, the childcare centre’s toilet rainwater reuse demand has been reduced
accordingly.
The design rainwater tank volume shown on the siteworks plans is 15% greater than the
rainwater tank volume calculated in MUSIC to allow for off-take and top-up levels in accordance
with Council requirements for tank sizes less than 120kL. The following tables provide the toilet
and landscaping rainwater reuse demand:
Table 7: Toilet Rainwater Reuse Demand
Facility Number of Toilets Reuse Demand Per Day
Childcare Centre 17 0.425 kL/day
Retail Pod 1 & 2 18 0.63 kL/day
Medical Centre 17 0.595 kL/day
Supermarket 7 0.245 kL/day
Source: Number of toilets provided by project architect
Table 8: Landscaping Rainwater Reuse Demand
Facility Pervious Landscaped Area Reuse Demand Per Year
Childcare Centre 165m2 49.5 kL/year
Retail Pod 1 & 2 245m2 73.5 kL/year
Medical Centre 375m2 112.5 kL/year
Supermarket 494m2 148.2 kL/year
Source: Pervious landscaped areas provided by project landscape architect
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 14 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Please refer to Appendix K for the pervious area landscaping rainwater reuse plan.
Table 9: Rainwater Tank Sizing
Tank Reuse Demand Met
Modelled Tank Size (15% reduction)
Actual Tank Size
Rainwater Tank J2 (Childcare Centre)
79.56% 10.9kL 12.8kL
Rainwater Tank B9 (Retail Pod 1 & 2)
75.10% 12.0kL 14.2kL
Rainwater Tank S1
(Medical Centre) 83.17% 12.0kL 14.2kL
Rainwater Tank L1 (Supermarket)
78.11% 16.0kL 18.9kL
Average 79.00% Total 51kL Total 60kL
MUSIC analysis indicates that the rainwater tank sizes as outlined in Table 9 provide for 79% of
the sitewide water demand which should be satisfactory to meet Council’s reuse requirements.
As the tank size installed must be equal to or greater than the actual tank size specified in Table
9, the 80% re-use demand will be met.
The excess water from the rainwater tanks will discharge into the stormwater network and
through the treatment train prior to leaving the site. Due to the uncertain nature of the rainwater
supply, the tanks will be connected to mains water for “top-ups” in dry weather conditions.
5.4 Water Quality Modelling
Treatment removal loads were analysed using MUSIC (Model for Urban Stormwater
Improvement Conceptualisation) Version 6.2.1 software. MUSIC was utilised to simulate urban
stormwater systems operating at a range of temporal and spatial scales. MUSIC models the
total amount of gross pollutants and nutrients produced within various types of catchments. It
allows the user to simulate the removal rates expected when implementing removal filters to
reduce the increased gross pollutant and nutrient levels created by the proposed development.
5.4.1 MUSIC Model – Parameters and Methodology
In order to assess the effectiveness of the stormwater quality systems that are to be included as
part of the subdivision, a MUSIC model was created using the follow parameters and
methodology:
5.4.1.1 Developed Site
The following methodology and parameters were incorporated into the MUSIC modelling for the
post-developed site:
● The Blacktown City Council MUSIC link was used for the MUSIC model;
● The post-developed site was consolidated into three main sub-catchment areas (western,
central, and eastern) based on the proposed drainage system. The areas are as follows:
Table 10: Area Breakdown per MUSIC Sub-Catchment
MUSIC Sub-Catchment Area (Ha)
Western Catchment 0.710
Central Catchment 0.612
Eastern Catchment 1.205
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 15 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
MUSIC Sub-Catchment Area (Ha)
Total 2.527
● The three catchments were then separated into “Road”, “Roof” and “Landscaping” areas
based on the proposed lot layout. The landscaped areas were broken up into pervious and
impervious percentages based on information received from the landscape architect (refer to
Appendix K for landscaping rainwater reuse plan);
● Bypass areas have been based on areas that will not be treated by any treatment device;
● Table 11 below outlines the adopted areas for each sub-catchment:
Table 11: MUSIC Catchment Breakdown
MUSIC Sub-Catchment
Roof (Ha) Road (Ha) Landscape (Ha)
Bypass – Landscape
(Ha)
Total Area (Ha)
Western Catchment 0.098 0.304 0.308 0.0 0.710
Central Catchment 0.573 0.011 0.026 0.002 0.612
Eastern Catchment 0.175 0.833 0.193 0.004 1.205
Total 0.846 1.148 0.527 0.006 1.527
● Rainwater tanks have been proposed to collect flows from roofed areas with the following
tank sizes:
Table 12: Rainwater Tank Sizes
Rainwater Tank Catchment Size in MUSIC (kL)
RWT J2 Western 10.9
RWT B9 Central 12
RWT L1 Central 12
RWT S1 Eastern 16
● The pollutant concentration parameters used within the model were based on the
recommended model defaults for different land use categories. These are summarised in the
following tables:
Table 13: Post Development Areas – MUSIC Node Classification
MUSIC Node Classification
Roof “Roof”
Road “Sealedroad”
Landscaping “Mixed”
Table 14: MUSIC Node – Rainfall Runoff Parameters
Classific-ation
TSS TP TN
Mean Std Dev Mean Std Dev Mean Std Dev
“Roof” Base Flow 1.10 0.17 -0.82 0.19 0.32 0.12
Storm Flow 1.30 0.32 -0.89 0.25 0.30 0.19
“Road” Base Flow 1.20 0.17 -0.85 0.19 0.11 0.12
Storm Flow 2.43 0.32 -0.30 0.25 0.34 0.19
“Mixed” Base Flow 1.20 0.17 -0.85 0.19 0.11 0.12
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 16 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Classific-ation
TSS TP TN
Mean Std Dev Mean Std Dev Mean Std Dev
Storm Flow 2.15 0.32 -0.60 0.25 0.30 0.19
● The soil properties for the pervious areas of the catchment were defined based on the
recommended parameters listed below and set out in Blacktown City Council’s Developer
Handbook for Water Sensitive Urban Design:
Table 15: MUSIC Soil Parameters
Soil Properties Roof Road Landscaping
Impervious Threshold (mm) 1.4 1.4 1.4
Soil Storage Capacity (mm) 170 170 170
Initial Storage (% of Capacity) 30 30 30
Field Capacity (mm) 70 70 70
Infiltration Coefficient ‘a’ 210 210 210
Infiltration Coefficient ‘b’ 4.7 4.7 4.7
Initial Groundwater Depth (mm) 10 10 10
Daily Recharge Rate (%) 50 50 50
Daily Base Flow Rate (%) 4 4 4
Daily Deep Seepage Rate (%) 0 0 0
A treatment train was designed to incorporate a series of treatment nodes including swales,
hydrodynamic separators, filter cartridges, StormSack pit inserts, and rainwater tanks. A
snapshot of the MUSIC model can be sign in Figure 4. The effectiveness of the proposed
treatments is summarised in Section 5.4.2 below.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 17 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Figure 4: MUSIC Model
5.4.2 MUSIC Results
Table 16: MUSIC Model Results
Pollutant Sources (kg/yr)
Residual Load (kg/yr)
Removal Rate Target Removal Rate
Total Suspended Solids 3,710 269 92.7% 85%
Total Phosphorus 6.81 2.5 63.2% 65%
Total Nitrogen 40.6 17 58.2% 45%
Gross Pollutants 464 1.56 99.7% 90%
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 18 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Results of the MUSIC analysis indicate that, by including the nominated treatment train as
described in this report, the post-developed water quality improvement objectives set out in
Blacktown City Council’s DCP are achieved for suspended solids, nitrogen, and gross
pollutants. The total phosphorus is slightly under target, however within a reasonable range, as
discussed with Tony Merrilees at Blacktown City Council. Mott MacDonald notes that the
implementation of additional SPEL Bay Filters and increases in rainwater tank sizes result in a
negligible increase in total phosphorus reduction. The MUSIC Link report is provided in
Appendix J of this report.
5.5 Stream Erosion Index Modelling
5.5.1 Parameters and Methodology
The Stream Erosion Index (SEI) was calculated in accordance with Section 19 of Blacktown City
Council’s Developer Handbook for Water Sensitive Design. The method was developed in the
Draft NSW MUSIC Modelling Guide (2010). Blacktown City Council requires that the post-
development duration of stream forming flows shall be no greater than 3.5 times the pre-
developed duration of stream forming flows, with a stretch target of 1.
The Four Steps for Estimating Stream Erosion Index are:
1. Estimate the critical flow for the receiving waterway above which mobilisation of bed
material or shear erosion of bank material commences. 2. Develop and run a calibrated MUSIC model of the area of interest for pre-development
conditions to estimate the mean annual runoff volume above the critical flow. 3. Develop and run a MUSIC model for the post-developed scenario to estimate the mean
annual runoff volume above the critical flow. 4. Use the outputs from steps 3 and 4 to calculate the SEI for the proposed scenario.
5.5.1.1 Step 1: Critical Flow Estimation
Using the area of the site (in km2), calculate the Time of Concentration using the probabilistic
rational method from equation 1.4 of AR&R Volume 1, Book 4.
𝐴 = 2.527 ℎ𝑎 = 0.02527 𝑘𝑚2
∴ 𝑡𝑐 = 0.187 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 = 11 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠
Select I2 (mm/hr) from the Rainfall Intensity Chart in the Engineering Guide for Development
based on the 2 year ARI and the calculated in minutes.
𝐼2 = 73𝑚𝑚
ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟
Determine the two year ARI runoff coefficient C2 using equation 1.5 of AR&R Volume 1, Book 4:
𝐶2 = 𝐶10 𝑥 𝐹𝐹2 = 0.6 𝑥 0.74 = 0.444
where C10 is the 10 year runoff coefficient from Fig 5.1 from AR&R Volume 2 = 60%, and FF2 =
the 2 year frequency factor from Table 1.1 of AR&R Volume 1, Book 4 = 0.74.
Using the rational method Q2 = 0.278 x C2 x I2 x A, substitute results from 2 and 3 above.
𝑄2 = 0.278 × 0.444 × 73𝑚𝑚
ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟 × 0.02527 𝑘𝑚2 = 0.228
𝑚3
𝑠
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 19 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Determine Q critical as 25% of the Q2 flow rate.
𝑄𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = 0.228𝑚3
𝑠× 25% = 0.057
𝑚3
𝑠
5.5.1.2 Step 2: Pre-Development MUSIC Model
A pre-development model MUSIC model was created to assess the mean annual flows of the
site, as shown in Figure 5. A generic node was inserted into the model directly upstream of the
receiving node, in accordance with Section 19.3 of Council’s Draft NSW MUSIC Modelling
Guide (2010). The mean annual runoff volume above the critical flow was determined to be
equal to 0.807 m3/s.
Figure 5: Pre-Development SEI MUSIC Model
5.5.1.3 Step 3: Post-Development MUSIC Model
A post-development model MUSIC model was created to assess the mean annual flows of the
site, as shown in Figure 6. A generic node was inserted into the model directly upstream of the
receiving node, in accordance with Section 19.3 of Council’s Draft NSW MUSIC Modelling
Guide (2010). The mean annual runoff volume above the critical flow was determined to be
equal to 2.56 m3/s.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 20 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Figure 6: Post-Development SEI MUSIC Model
5.5.1.4 Step 4: SEI Calculation
The SEI is calculated as the ratio of the output mean annual flow from the generic node for the
post-developed model over the corresponding value for the pre-development model as detailed
below:
𝑆𝐸𝐼 = ∑(𝑄𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 − 𝑄𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙)
∑(𝑄𝑝𝑟𝑒 − 𝑄𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙)
Where:
𝑄𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 2.57 𝑚3/𝑠
𝑄𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = 0.057 𝑚3/𝑠
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 21 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
𝑄𝑝𝑟𝑒 = 0.807 𝑚3/𝑠
Therefore:
𝑆𝐸𝐼 = ∑ (2.57 − 0.057) 𝑚3/𝑠
∑ (0.807 − 0.057) 𝑚3/𝑠
𝑆𝐸𝐼 = 3.35
As Blacktown City Council requires a maximum SEI value of 3.5, this value is deemed
acceptable and meets the relevant standards.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 22 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
6 Staging
Construction of the Elara Neighbourhood Centre will be undertaken in two stages. This staging
has been considered during the design of the stormwater network to minimise temporary works.
As such, Stage 1 can drain independently of Stage 2. In addition, the stormwater quality devices
will treat Stage 1 during the time that Stage 2 is under development.
Refer to General Arrangement drawing 388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0010 for staging of works.
Further staging details will be confirmed during the detailed design stage.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 23 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
Appendices
A. DRAINS Input Data 24
B. 6-month ARI DRAINS Results 25
C. 10yr ARI DRAINS Results 26
D. 100yr ARI DRAINS Results 27
E. DRAINS Catchment Plan 28
F. MUSIC Catchment Plan 29
G. HumeCeptor Brochure 30
H. SPELFilter Brochure 31
I. SPEL StormSack Brochure 32
J. MUSIC Link Results 33
K. Landscaping Rainwater Reuse Plan 34
L. Council Correspondence 35
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 24 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
A. DRAINS Input Data
PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 13
Name Type Family Size Ponding Pressure Surface Max Pond Base Blocking x y Bolt-down id Part Full Inflow Pit is
Volume Change Elev (m) Depth (m) Inflow Factor lid Shock Loss Hydrograph
(cu.m) Coeff. Ku (cu.m/s)
Pit P2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.4 0 0 298012.3 6269419 No 11291394 1 x Ku No New
Pit P1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 27.84 0 0 297994.9 6269426 No 11291393 1 x Ku No New
Pit A3 (HUMES)OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 1 27.85 0 0 297984.7 6269418 Yes 11291391 1 x Ku No New
Pit A2 (SPEL)OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 4 27.72 0 0 297988.2 6269414 Yes 11291390 1 x Ku No New
Pit A1 OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 1.5 27.61 0 0 297992.7 6269408 Yes 11291388 1 x Ku No New
G07/01 Node 27.73 0 297998.3 6269405 11291389 No
Pit T1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.1 0 0 298025.6 6269431 No 11291395 1 x Ku No New
Pit B1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 26.95 0 0 298026.1 6269435 Yes 11291419 1 x Ku No New
G06/01 Node 26.76 0 298034.1 6269432 11291440 No
Pit K2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.96 0 0 297968.7 6269386 No 11291396 1 x Ku No New
Pit K1 Sag NSW RTA SA Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeSA1 1 2 28.01 0.1 0 0 297962.1 6269385 No 11291462 1 x Ku No New
Pit A5 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2.5 28.46 0 0 297954.6 6269398 Yes 11291398 1 x Ku No New
Pit A4 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 28.06 0 0 297970.2 6269408 No 11291392 1 x Ku No New
Pit M1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 28.21 0 0 297962.7 6269377 No 11291397 1 x Ku No New
Node J2 Node 28.86 0 297915.7 6269420 11291404 No
Pit J1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 28.97 0 0 297919 6269413 Yes 11291403 1 x Ku No New
Pit A6 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 2 28.53 0 0 297933 6269424 No 11291402 1 x Ku No New
Pit D5 Sag NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1 4 28.59 0.1 0 0 297888.7 6269433 No 11291407 1 x Ku No New
Pit D4 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1 28.7 0 0 297897.9 6269406 No 11291406 1 x Ku No New
Pit D3 Sag NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1 1.5 28.55 0.1 0 0 297902.6 6269385 No 11291405 1 x Ku No New
Pit D2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 28.62 0 0 297929.9 6269370 No 11291401 1 x Ku No New
Pit D1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 28.8 0 0 297945.7 6269374 Yes 11291399 1 x Ku No New
Pit G2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 29.44 0 0 297898.5 6269438 No 11291408 1 x Ku No New
Pit G1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 29.16 0 0 297903.1 6269456 No 11291409 1 x Ku No New
Pit A7 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 3 29.22 0 0 297908.7 6269457 No 11291410 1 x Ku No New
Pit H1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 29.22 0 0 297923.9 6269482 No 11291413 1 x Ku No New
Pit A8 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2.5 29.25 0 0 297924 6269469 No 11291411 1 x Ku No New
Pit A10 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 28.88 0 0 297913.8 6269502 No 11291416 1 x Ku No New
Pit A9 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 29.08 0 0 297909.6 6269493 No 11291414 1 x Ku No New
Node L1 Node 28.15 0 297994.2 6269440 11291421 No
Pit B5 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 27.35 0 0 298002.8 6269446 Yes 11291420 1 x Ku No New
Pit B4 (HUMES)OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 0.5 27.3 0 0 298004.9 6269443 Yes 58900088 1 x Ku No New
Pit B3 (SPEL)OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 4 27.24 0 0 298007.3 6269440 Yes 58900087 1 x Ku No New
Pit B2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 27.2 0 0 298009.2 6269437 Yes 68465611 1 x Ku No New
Pit E3 Sag NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 1 4 26.03 0.15 0 0 298091.8 6269485 No 11291423 1 x Ku No New
Pit E2 Sag NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1 0.5 26.1 0.1 0 0 298092.2 6269489 No 11291434 1 x Ku No New
Pit E1 Sag NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 1 1.5 26.02 0.15 0 0 298092.7 6269494 No 11291433 1 x Ku No New
Pit204517 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 26.15 0 0 298090.6 6269497 Yes 67250381 1 x Ku No New
Pit C3 (HUMES)OnGrade Junction Pit or Manhole (sealed)Junction Pit or Manhole 0.5 26.37 0 0 298082.2 6269491 Yes 11291438 1 x Ku No New
Pit C2 (SPEL)OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 26.3 0 0 298085.9 6269486 Yes 11291439 1 x Ku No New
Pit C1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 26.05 0 0 298088.8 6269482 Yes 11291432 1 x Ku No New
G05/01 Node 25.68 0 298095.1 6269479 11291441 No
Pit Q4 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 4 26.62 0 0 298047 6269450 No 11291426 1 x Ku No New
Pit Q3 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 0.5 26.44 0 0 298059.2 6269460 No 11291425 1 x Ku No New
Pit Q2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 1.5 26.24 0 0 298075.2 6269472 No 67851879 1 x Ku No New
Pit Q1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 26.35 0 0 298075.2 6269486 Yes 15923596 1 x Ku No New
Pit F5 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.2 0 0 298016.5 6269465 No 11291427 1 x Ku No New
Pit F4 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 27.06 0 0 298029.1 6269474 No 11291428 1 x Ku No New
Pit F3 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 26.9 0 0 298043.7 6269485 No 11291429 1 x Ku No New
Pit F2 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 26.71 0 0 298056.9 6269495 No 11291430 1 x Ku No New
Pit F1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 26.54 0 0 298068.9 6269504 No 11291431 1 x Ku No New
Pit C5 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 26.45 0 0 298080.5 6269513 No 11291436 1 x Ku No New
Pit R1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 26.88 0 0 298064.6 6269535 No 11291443 1 x Ku No New
Pit C7 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 26.8 0 0 298061.9 6269529 Yes 11291442 1 x Ku No New
Pit C6 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM10 Inlet, 3% crossfall, all gradesRM10 1.8 m lintel 1.5 26.54 0 0 298073 6269518 No 11291437 1 x Ku No New
Pit N1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.48 0 0 298043.7 6269556 No 11291445 1 x Ku No New
Pit C9 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 27.64 0 0 298025.6 6269542 No 11291446 1 x Ku No New
Pit C8 OnGrade NSW RTA SA Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeSA1 1.5 26.93 0 0 298057.2 6269539 No 11291444 1 x Ku No New
Pit C12 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 28.03 0 0 297972.8 6269501 No 11291449 1 x Ku No New
Pit C11 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 28 0 0 297990.1 6269515 No 11291448 1 x Ku No New
Pit C10 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 27.82 0 0 298006.6 6269528 No 11291447 1 x Ku No New
Node B9 Node 29.2 0 297927.9 6269486 11291450 No
Pit B8 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 1.5 29.25 0 0 297937.4 6269480 No 11291412 1 x Ku No New
Pit B7 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 0.5 28.74 0 0 297949.6 6269488 No 11291417 1 x Ku No New
Pit B6 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 2 28.17 0 0 297963.7 6269499 Yes 11291418 1 x Ku No New
Node S1 Node 27.65 0 298009.2 6269524 11291451 No
Node Low D3Node 28.5 0 297902.8 6269375 11291844 No
N G04/06 Node 28.4 0 297952.6 6269371 11291846 No
G01/08 Node 26.5 0 298068.7 6269536 11292906 No
F01/15 Node 27.75 0 297965.1 6269534 11294541 No
Node Low D5Node 28.5 0 297883.2 6269433 21663193 No
Pit U1 OnGrade NSW Dept. of Housing RM7 Inlet, 3% crossfall, 1% gradeRM7 4 27.06 0 0 298059 6269541 No 49525667 1 x Ku No New
N Bypass 1 Node 28.95 0 297884.7 6269511 51754236 No
N Bypass 2 Node 27.46 0 298016.5 6269573 51754241 No
DETENTION BASIN DETAILS
Name Elev Surf. Area Not Used Outlet Type K Dia(mm) Centre RL Pit Family Pit Type x y HED Crest RL Crest Length(m)id
SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS
Name Pit or Total Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Paved Grass Supp Lag Time Gutter Gutter Gutter Rainfall
Node Area Area Area Area Time Time Time Length Length Length Slope(%) Slope Slope Rough Rough Rough or Factor Length Slope FlowFactor Multiplier
(ha) % % % (min) (min) (min) (m) (m) (m) % % % (m) %
Cat P2 Pit P2 0.0558 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat P1 Pit P1 0.0361 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat T1 Pit T1 0.022 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat K2 Pit K2 0.0239 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat K1 Pit K1 0.0672 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat A4 Pit A4 0.0394 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat M1 Pit M1 0.0191 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat J2 Node J2 0.0985 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat A6 Pit A6 0.1252 90 10 0 5 10 0
Cat D5 Pit D5 0.0257 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat D3 Pit D3 0.0647 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat D2 Pit D2 0.0085 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat G2 Pit G2 0.0214 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat G1 Pit G1 0.0066 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat H1 Pit H1 0.0254 70 30 0 5 10 0
Cat A8 Pit A8 0.001 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat A10 Pit A10 0.0407 70 30 0 5 10 0
Cat A9 Pit A9 0.0465 80 20 0 5 10 0
Cat L1 Node L1 0.3808 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat E3 Pit E3 0.1273 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat E2 Pit E2 0.0278 0 100 0 5 10 0
Cat E1 Pit E1 0.1408 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat Q4 Pit Q4 0.1117 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat Q3 Pit Q3 0.1281 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat Q2 Pit Q2 0.1154 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat F5 Pit F5 0.0287 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat F4 Pit F4 0.0409 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat F3 Pit F3 0.0417 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat F2 Pit F2 0.043 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat F1 Pit F1 0.0431 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat C5 Pit C5 0.0064 0 100 0 5 10 0
Cat R1 Pit R1 0.0255 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat C6 Pit C6 0.0598 95 5 0 5 10 0
Cat C8 Pit C8 0.0417 90 10 0 5 10 0
Cat C12 Pit C12 0.0422 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat B9 Node B9 0.1925 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat B7 Pit B7 0.0147 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat S1 Node S1 0.1753 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat Bypass 1N Bypass 1 0.0081 100 0 0 5 10 0
Cat Bypass 2N Bypass 2 0.0043 100 0 0 5 10 0
PIPE DETAILS
Name From To Length U/S IL D/S IL Slope Type Dia I.D. Rough Pipe Is No. Pipes Chg From At Chg Chg Rl Chg RL etc
(m) (m) (m) (%) (mm) (mm) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Pipe P2-P1 Pit P2 Pit P1 15.1 26.56 26.21 2.32 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit P2 0
Pipe P1-P3 Pit P1 Pit A3 (HUMES) 11.1 26.19 26.08 0.99 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit P1 0
Pipe A3-A2 Pit A3 (HUMES)Pit A2 (SPEL) 2 26.48 26.46 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope525 525 0.3 New 1 Pit A3 (HUMES) 0
Pipe A2-A1 Pit A2 (SPEL)Pit A1 2 25.58 25.56 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope525 525 0.3 New 1 Pit A2 (SPEL) 0
Pipe A1-G7/01Pit A1 G07/01 5.3 25.47 25.42 0.94 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope675 675 0.3 New 1 Pit A1 0
Pipe T1-B1 Pit T1 Pit B1 4 26.22 26.18 1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit T1 0
Pipe B1-G06/01Pit B1 G06/01 6.7 25.13 25.06 1.04 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit B1 0
Pipe K2-K1 Pit K2 Pit K1 8.7 27.2 27.11 1.03 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit K2 0
Pipe K1-A5 Pit K1 Pit A5 10.3 27.09 26.98 1.07 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit K1 0
Pipe A5-A4 Pit A5 Pit A4 16.1 26.87 26.71 0.99 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit A5 0
Pipe A4-A3 Pit A4 Pit A3 (HUMES) 17.3 26.69 26.51 1.04 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit A4 0
Pipe M1-K1Pit M1 Pit K1 5.2 27.3 27.25 0.96 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit M1 0
Pipe J2-J1 Node J2 Pit J1 4.6 27.97 27.92 1.09 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Node J2 0
Pipe J1-A6 Pit J1 Pit A6 16.9 27.9 27.73 1.01 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit J1 0
Pipe A6-A5 Pit A6 Pit A5 21.4 27.11 26.89 1.03 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit A6 0
Pipe D5-D4 Pit D5 Pit D4 21.5 28.01 27.8 0.98 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit D5 0
Pipe D4-D3 Pit D4 Pit D3 21.2 27.81 27.6 0.99 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit D4 0
Pipe D3-D2 Pit D3 Pit D2 28 27.58 27.3 1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit D3 0
Pipe D2-D1 Pit D2 Pit D1 19.4 27.3 27.11 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit D2 0
Pipe D1-A5 Pit D1 Pit A5 20.7 27.09 26.89 0.97 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit D1 0
Pipe G2-G1 Pit G2 Pit G1 17.8 28.58 28.4 1.01 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit G2 0
Pipe G1-A7 Pit G1 Pit A7 5.5 28.38 28.32 1.09 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit G1 0
Pipe A7-A6 Pit A7 Pit A6 55 27.68 27.13 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit A7 0
Pipe H1-A8 Pit H1 Pit A8 12.5 28.5 28.37 1.04 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit H1 0
Pipe A8-A7 Pit A8 Pit A7 16.8 27.87 27.7 1.01 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit A8 0
Pipe A10-A9Pit A10 Pit A9 10 28.3 28.2 1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit A10 0
Pipe A9-A8 Pit A9 Pit A8 28.4 28.18 27.89 1.02 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit A9 0
Pipe L1-B5 Node L1 Pit B5 5.7 26.56 26.5 1.05 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Node L1 0
Pipe B5-B4 Pit B5 Pit B4 (HUMES) 2 26.29 26.27 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit B5 0
Pipe B4-B3 Pit B4 (HUMES)Pit B3 (SPEL) 2 26.24 26.22 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit B4 (HUMES) 0
Pipe B3-B2 Pit B3 (SPEL)Pit B2 2 25.34 25.32 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit B3 (SPEL) 0
Pipe B2-B1 Pit B2 Pit B1 15 25.3 25.15 1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 450 0.3 New 1 Pit B2 0
Pipe E3-E2 Pit E3 Pit E2 4.1 25.18 25.14 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit E3 0
Pipe E2-E1 Pit E2 Pit E1 4.1 25.12 25.08 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit E2 0
Pipe E1-C1 Pit E1 Pit204517 2.6 25.06 25.03 1.15 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit E1 0
Pipe C4-C3 Pit204517 Pit C3 (HUMES) 9.1 25.01 24.92 0.99 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope600 600 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit204517 0
Pipe C3-C2 Pit C3 (HUMES)Pit C2 (SPEL) 2.1 24.89 24.88 0.48 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope600 600 0.3 New 1 Pit C3 (HUMES) 0
Pipe C2-C1 Pit C2 (SPEL)Pit C1 2.1 24.38 24.37 0.48 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope675 675 0.3 New 1 Pit C2 (SPEL) 0
Pipe C1-G05/01Pit C1 G05/01 6.6 24.35 24.29 0.91 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope675 675 0.3 New 1 Pit C1 0
Pipe Q4-Q3Pit Q4 Pit Q3 16.6 25.5 25.33 1.02 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit Q4 0
Pipe Q3-Q2Pit Q3 Pit Q2 16.4 25.31 25.15 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit Q3 0
Pipe Q2-Q1Pit Q2 Pit Q1 12.2 25.13 25.01 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit Q2 0
Pipe Q1-C3 Pit Q1 Pit C3 (HUMES) 6.7 24.99 24.92 1.04 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit Q1 0
Pipe F5-F4 Pit F5 Pit F4 13.8 26.4 26.26 1.01 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit F5 0
Pipe F4-F3 Pit F4 Pit F3 16.6 26.24 26.07 1.02 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit F4 0
Pipe F3-F2 Pit F3 Pit F2 16.4 26.05 25.88 1.04 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit F3 0
Pipe F2-F1 Pit F2 Pit F1 13.8 25.86 25.73 0.94 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit F2 0
Pipe F1-C5 Pit F1 Pit C5 13.7 25.71 25.58 0.95 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit F1 0
Pipe C5-C4 Pit C5 Pit204517 17.6 25.56 25.03 3.01 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 NewFixed 1 Pit C5 0
Pipe R1-C7 Pit R1 Pit C7 3.7 26.24 26.2 1.08 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit R1 0
Pipe C7-C6 Pit C7 Pit C6 13.6 25.83 25.69 1.03 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit C7 0
Pipe C6-C5 Pit C6 Pit C5 9.2 25.67 25.58 0.98 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit C6 0
Pipe N1-C9 Pit N1 Pit C9 21.4 26.92 26.7 1.03 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit N1 0
Pipe C9-C8 Pit C9 Pit C8 32.5 26.78 26.17 1.88 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit C9 0
Pipe C8-C7 Pit C8 Pit C7 9.4 25.94 25.85 0.96 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit C8 0
Pipe C12-C11Pit C12 Pit C11 21.5 27.47 27.25 1.02 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit C12 0
Pipe C11-C10Pit C11 Pit C10 21.5 27.12 26.94 0.84 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Pit C11 0
Pipe C10-C9Pit C10 Pit C9 21.4 26.92 26.7 1.03 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit C10 0
Pipe B9-B8 Node B9 Pit B8 7.8 28.57 28.49 1.03 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Node B9 0
Pipe B8-B7 Pit B8 Pit B7 15 28.47 28.09 2.53 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit B8 0
Pipe B7-B6 Pit B7 Pit B6 15.3 28.07 27.5 3.73 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 300 0.3 New 1 Pit B7 0
Pipe B6-B5 Pit B6 Pit B5 64.7 27.18 26.38 1.24 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 375 0.3 New 1 Pit B6 0
Pipe S1-C10Node S1 Pit C10 0.9 27 26.94 6.67 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 225 0.3 New 1 Node S1 0
Pipe U1-C8 Pit U1 Pit C8 1 26.31 26.3 1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope100 100 0.3 New 1 Pit U1 0
DETAILS of SERVICES CROSSING PIPES
Pipe Chg Bottom Height of ServiceChg Bottom Height of ServiceChg Bottom Height of Serviceetc
(m) Elev (m) (m) (m) Elev (m) (m) (m) Elev (m) (m) etc
CHANNEL DETAILS
Name From To Type Length U/S IL D/S IL Slope Base WidthL.B. Slope R.B. Slope Manning Depth Roofed
(m) (m) (m) (%) (m) (1:?) (1:?) n (m)
OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS
Name From To Travel Spill Crest Weir Cross Safe Depth SafeDepth Safe Bed D/S Area id
Time Level Length Coeff. C Section Major StormsMinor StormsDxV Slope Contributing
(min) (m) (m) (m) (m) (sq.m/sec) (%) %
OF P2 Pit P2 G06/01 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 2.28 0 11294485 25
OF P1 Pit P1 Pit P2 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 3.4 0 11294487 15
OF T1 Pit T1 G06/01 0.1 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 4 0 11294483 10
OF K2 Pit K2 G07/01 0.3 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 0.92 0 11294529 25
OF K1 Pit K1 G07/01 0.4 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 0.95 0 20973108 40
OF A4 Pit A4 Pit K2 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.67 0 11294496 15
OF A6 Pit A6 Pit K1 0.3 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.49 0 11294502 35
OF D5 Pit D5 Node Low D5 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1 0 21663195 2
OF D4 Pit D4 Pit D3 0.5 Overflow across road low point - parabola x = 15, y = 0.30.05 0 0.6 1 0 11294507 22
OF D3 Pit D3 Node Low D3 0.3 Overflow across road low point - parabola x = 15, y = 0.30.05 0 0.6 0.5 0 11294508 10
OF D2 Pit D2 N G04/06 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 2.2 0 11294515 10
OF G2 Pit G2 Pit A6 0.4 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.82 0 11294517 50
OF G1 Pit G1 Pit A6 0.6 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.05 0 11294519 60
OF A7 Pit A7 Pit A6 0.5 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.25 0 11294523 55
OF A8 Pit A8 Pit A9 0.3 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.61 0 11294525 28
OF A10 Pit A10 F01/15 0.5 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.88 0 11294546 60
OF A9 Pit A9 Pit A10 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 2 0 11294526 10
OF E3 Pit E3 G05/01 0.1 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 5.5 0 11294442 6
OF E1 Pit E1 G05/01 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.7 0 11294440 20
OF Q4 Pit Q4 Pit Q3 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.06 0 11294450 17
OF Q3 Pit Q3 Pit Q2 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.25 0 11294446 16
OF Q1 Pit Q2 Pit E3 0.5 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 0.52 0 67851881 40
OF F5 Pit F5 Pit Q3 0.3 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.69 0 11294453 45
OF F4 Pit F4 Pit Q2 0.3 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.82 0 11294454 45
OF F3 Pit F3 Pit E3 0.3 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.78 0 11294459 50
OF F2 Pit F2 Pit E1 0.2 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.97 0 11294458 35
OF F1 Pit F1 Pit E1 0.2 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 2.08 0 11294460 25
OF C5 Pit C5 Pit E2 0.8 Swale with 1:6 sideslopes0.15 0.1 1 1.17 0 11294438 30
OF R1 Pit R1 G01/08 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 9.5 0 11292915 4
OF C6-E1 Pit C6 Pit E1 0.3 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 1.62 0 11294436 32
OF N1 Pit N1 Pit C8 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 2.5 0 11294425 22
OF C9 Pit C9 Pit R1 0.3 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.9 0 11294424 40
OF C8 Pit C8 Pit R1 0.2 7.5 m roadway with 3% crossfall and barrier kerb0.3 0.15 0.36 0.33 0 11292908 15
OF C12 Pit C12 Pit F3 0.5 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.55 0 11294401 73
OF C11 Pit C11 Pit F2 0.5 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.84 0 11294402 70
OF C10 Pit C10 Pit F1 0.4 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.94 0 11294423 66
OF B8 Pit B8 Pit B7 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 3.4 0 11294549 15
OF B7 Pit B7 Pit B6 0.1 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 3.8 0 11294551 15
OF B6 Pit B6 Pit F4 0.5 4 m wide pathway 0.3 0.15 0.4 1.56 0 11294426 71
PIPE COVER DETAILS
Name Type Dia (mm) Safe Cover (m)Cover (m)
Pipe P2-P1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.58
Pipe P1-P3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 1.39
Pipe A3-A2 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope525 0.6 0.69
Pipe A2-A1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope525 0.6 1.48
Pipe A1-G7/01Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope675 0.45 1.41
Pipe T1-B1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.51
Pipe B1-G06/01Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 1.21
Pipe K2-K1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.5 Unsafe
Pipe K1-A5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 0.59 Unsafe
Pipe A5-A4 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 0.86
Pipe A4-A3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 0.85
Pipe M1-K1Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.5 Unsafe
Pipe J2-J1 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.63
Pipe J1-A6 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.54 Unsafe
Pipe A6-A5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 1.01
Pipe D5-D4 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.32 Unsafe
Pipe D4-D3 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.56
Pipe D3-D2 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.45 0.56
Pipe D2-D1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.91
Pipe D1-A5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 1.16
Pipe G2-G1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.5 Unsafe
Pipe G1-A7 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.52
Pipe A7-A6 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 1.07
Pipe H1-A8 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.46
Pipe A8-A7 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 1.05
Pipe A10-A9Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.25 Unsafe
Pipe A9-A8 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.57
Pipe L1-B5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.59 Unsafe
Pipe B5-B4 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 0.54 Unsafe
Pipe B4-B3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 0.53 Unsafe
Pipe B3-B2 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 1.39
Pipe B2-B1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope450 0.6 1.31
Pipe E3-E2 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 0.52 Unsafe
Pipe E2-E1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 0.61
Pipe E1-C1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.55 Unsafe
Pipe C4-C3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope600 0.6 0.49 Unsafe
Pipe C3-C2 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope600 0.6 0.78
Pipe C2-C1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope675 0.6 0.95
Pipe C1-G05/01Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope675 0.6 0.66
Pipe Q4-Q3Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.85
Pipe Q3-Q2Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 0.76
Pipe Q2-Q1Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.7
Pipe Q1-C3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.95
Pipe F5-F4 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.54 Unsafe
Pipe F4-F3 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.56 Unsafe
Pipe F3-F2 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.57 Unsafe
Pipe F2-F1 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.55 Unsafe
Pipe F1-C5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.6 0.5 Unsafe
Pipe C5-C4 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.48 Unsafe
Pipe R1-C7 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.34 Unsafe
Pipe C7-C6 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.44 Unsafe
Pipe C6-C5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.46 Unsafe
Pipe N1-C9 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.3 Unsafe
Pipe C9-C8 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.43 Unsafe
Pipe C8-C7 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.45 0.54
Pipe C12-C11Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.3 Unsafe
Pipe C11-C10Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.45 0.62
Pipe C10-C9Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.57
Pipe B9-B8 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.3 Unsafe
Pipe B8-B7 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.32 Unsafe
Pipe B7-B6 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope300 0.45 0.34 Unsafe
Pipe B6-B5 Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope375 0.6 0.56 Unsafe
Pipe S1-C10Concrete, under roads, 1% minimum slope225 0.6 0.39 Unsafe
Pipe U1-C8 Concrete, not under roads, 1% minimum slope100 0.45 0.51
This model has no pipes with non-return valves
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 25 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
B. 6-month ARI DRAINS Results
DRAINS results prepared from Version 2017.11
PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 8
Name Max HGL Max Pond Max SurfaceMax Pond Min Overflow Constraint
HGL Flow ArrivingVolume Freeboard (cu.m/s)
(cu.m/s) (cu.m) (m)
Pit P2 26.73 0.008 0.67 0 None
Pit P1 26.71 0.006 1.13 0 None
Pit A3 (HUMES) 26.69 0 1.16 None
Pit A2 (SPEL) 25.85 0 1.87 None
Pit A1 25.67 0 1.94 None
G07/01 25.56 0
Pit T1 26.27 0.003 0.83 0 None
Pit B1 25.33 0 1.62 None
G06/01 25.22 0
Pit K2 27.27 0.004 0.69 0 None
Pit K1 27.19 28.05 0.01 0.2 0.82 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit A5 27.08 0 1.38 None
Pit A4 26.89 0.006 1.17 0 None
Pit M1 27.35 0.003 0.86 None
Node J2 28.05 0.015
Pit J1 28.01 0 0.96 None
Pit A6 27.3 0.018 1.23 0 None
Pit D5 28.07 28.6 0.004 0 0.52 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D4 27.86 0 0.84 0 None
Pit D3 27.66 28.56 0.01 0.1 0.89 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D2 27.38 0.001 1.24 0 None
Pit D1 27.19 0 1.61 None
Pit G2 28.63 0.003 0.81 0 None
Pit G1 28.44 0.001 0.72 0 None
Pit A7 27.79 0 1.43 0 None
Pit H1 28.55 0.003 0.67 None
Pit A8 27.96 0 1.29 0 None
Pit A10 28.37 0.004 0.51 0 None
Pit A9 28.26 0.006 0.82 0 None
Node L1 26.76 0.059
Pit B5 26.54 0 0.81 None
Pit B4 (HUMES) 26.44 0 0.86 None
Pit B3 (SPEL) 25.64 0 1.6 None
Pit B2 25.51 0 1.69 None
Pit E3 25.34 26.07 0.019 0.1 0.69 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit E2 25.29 26.1 0 0 0.81 None
Pit E1 25.29 26.06 0.021 0.1 0.73 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit204517 25.26 0 0.89 None
Pit C3 (HUMES) 25.16 0 1.21 None
Pit C2 (SPEL) 24.67 0 1.63 None
Pit C1 24.63 0 1.42 None
G05/01 24.48 0
Pit Q4 25.62 0.017 1 0 None
Pit Q3 25.45 0.019 0.99 0 None
Pit Q2 25.32 0.017 0.92 0 None
Pit Q1 25.21 0 1.14 None
Pit F5 26.46 0.004 0.74 0 None
Pit F4 26.32 0.006 0.74 0 None
Pit F3 26.15 0.006 0.75 0 None
Pit F2 25.98 0.006 0.73 0 None
Pit F1 25.84 0.006 0.7 0 None
Pit C5 25.79 0 0.66 0 None
Pit R1 26.3 0.004 0.58 0 None
Pit C7 26 0 0.8 None
Pit C6 25.86 0.009 0.68 0 None
Pit N1 26.94 0 0.54 0 None
Pit C9 26.94 0 0.7 0 None
Pit C8 26.09 0.006 0.84 0 None
Pit C12 27.54 0.007 0.49 0 None
Pit C11 27.18 0 0.82 0 None
Pit C10 27.06 0 0.76 0 None
Node B9 28.67 0.03
Pit B8 28.61 0 0.64 0 None
Pit B7 28.19 0.002 0.55 0 None
Pit B6 27.32 0 0.85 0 None
Node S1 27.08 0.027
Pit U1 26.31 0 0.75 None
SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS
Name Max Paved Grassed Paved Grassed Supp. Due to Storm
Flow Q Max Q Max Q Tc Tc Tc
(cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (min) (min) (min)
Cat P2 0.008 0.008 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat P1 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat T1 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K2 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K1 0.01 0.01 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A4 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat M1 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat J2 0.015 0.015 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A6 0.018 0.018 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D5 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D3 0.01 0.01 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D2 0.001 0.001 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G2 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G1 0.001 0.001 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat H1 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A8 0 0 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A10 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A9 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat L1 0.059 0.059 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E3 0.019 0.019 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E2 0 0 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 5 minutes storm, average 57.75 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E1 0.021 0.021 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q4 0.017 0.017 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q3 0.019 0.019 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q2 0.017 0.017 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F5 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F4 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F3 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F2 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F1 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C5 0 0 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 5 minutes storm, average 57.75 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat R1 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C6 0.009 0.009 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C8 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C12 0.007 0.007 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B9 0.03 0.03 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B7 0.002 0.002 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat S1 0.027 0.027 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 1 0.001 0.001 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 2 0.001 0.001 0 5 10 0 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Outflow Volumes for Total Catchment (2.39 impervious + 0.14 pervious = 2.53 total ha)
Storm Total RainfallTotal RunoffImpervious RunoffPervious Runoff
cu.m cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)
AR&R 6 year, 5 minutes storm, average 57.75 mm/h, Zone 1121.64 91.14 (74.9%)91.14 (79.2%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 10 minutes storm, average 44.25 mm/h, Zone 1186.42 152.41 (81.8%)152.41 (86.4%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 15 minutes storm, average 37.05 mm/h, Zone 1234.11 197.51 (84.4%)197.51 (89.2%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 20 minutes storm, average 32.25 mm/h, Zone 1271.71 233.07 (85.8%)233.07 (90.7%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1303.3 262.95 (86.7%)262.95 (91.7%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 30 minutes storm, average 26.18 mm/h, Zone 1330.85 289.01 (87.4%)289.01 (92.4%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 45 minutes storm, average 21 mm/h, Zone 1398.1 352.61 (88.6%)352.61 (93.7%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 1 hour storm, average 17.85 mm/h, Zone 1451.12 402.75 (89.3%)402.75 (94.4%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 1.5 hours storm, average 13.95 mm/h, Zone 1528.86 476.27 (90.1%)476.27 (95.2%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 2 hours storm, average 11.7 mm/h, Zone 1591.43 535.46 (90.5%)535.46 (95.7%)0.00 (0.0%)
AR&R 6 year, 3 hours storm, average 9.08 mm/h, Zone 1688.43 627.19 (91.1%)627.19 (96.3%)0.00 (0.0%)
PIPE DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Max U/S Max D/S Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s) HGL (m) HGL (m)
Pipe P2-P1 0.008 0.29 26.712 26.709 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe P1-P3 0.014 0.35 26.7 26.695 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A3-A2 0.093 1.83 26.63 26.611 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A2-A1 0.093 2.1 25.716 25.711 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A1-G7/01 0.094 2.02 25.597 25.561 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe T1-B1 0.003 2.57 26.237 26.218 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B1-G06/010.092 1.88 25.286 25.216 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K2-K1 0.004 0.81 27.239 27.194 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K1-A5 0.017 1.92 27.146 27.078 AR&R 6 year, 20 minutes storm, average 32.25 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A5-A4 0.076 4.15 26.947 26.892 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A4-A3 0.081 4.69 26.765 26.695 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe M1-K1 0.003 2.43 27.316 27.285 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J2-J1 0.015 1.19 28.051 28.012 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J1-A6 0.016 4.12 27.934 27.811 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A6-A5 0.048 1.64 27.227 27.078 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D5-D4 0.004 1.24 28.041 27.858 AR&R 6 year, 15 minutes storm, average 37.05 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D4-D3 0.004 0.74 27.846 27.664 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D3-D2 0.014 1.4 27.634 27.384 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D2-D1 0.015 1.75 27.349 27.186 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D1-A5 0.014 1.08 27.155 27.078 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G2-G1 0.003 2.3 28.598 28.437 AR&R 6 year, 20 minutes storm, average 32.25 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G1-A7 0.004 1.39 28.41 28.361 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A7-A6 0.017 2.02 27.732 27.298 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe H1-A8 0.003 2.05 28.518 28.405 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A8-A7 0.014 1.88 27.919 27.79 AR&R 6 year, 15 minutes storm, average 37.05 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A10-A9 0.004 0.81 28.339 28.258 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A9-A8 0.011 1.94 28.221 27.961 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe L1-B5 0.06 1.6 26.759 26.699 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B5-B4 0.089 1.87 26.443 26.439 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B4-B3 0.089 1.84 26.395 26.375 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B3-B2 0.089 1.62 25.509 25.507 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B2-B1 0.089 2.92 25.411 25.331 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E3-E2 0.019 0.75 25.295 25.292 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E2-E1 0.019 0.46 25.287 25.285 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E1-C1 0.039 0.64 25.262 25.261 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C4-C3 0.114 1.72 25.181 25.165 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C3-C2 0.165 1.65 25.121 25.117 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C2-C1 0.165 1.32 24.637 24.633 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C1-G05/010.165 2.83 24.499 24.479 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q4-Q3 0.017 3.44 25.541 25.451 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q3-Q2 0.035 1.47 25.421 25.32 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q2-Q1 0.052 1.6 25.255 25.214 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q1-C3 0.051 0.97 25.171 25.165 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F5-F4 0.005 1.59 26.428 26.32 AR&R 6 year, 20 minutes storm, average 32.25 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F4-F3 0.01 1.09 26.304 26.153 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F3-F2 0.016 1.24 26.131 25.984 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F2-F1 0.022 1.31 25.959 25.836 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F1-C5 0.028 1.37 25.81 25.792 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C5-C4 0.077 2.68 25.675 25.261 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe R1-C7 0.004 2.67 26.257 26.239 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C7-C6 0.042 1.59 25.937 25.863 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C6-C5 0.049 1.33 25.807 25.792 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe N1-C9 0 0 26.941 26.94 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C9-C8 0.032 1.81 26.869 26.259 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C8-C7 0.038 1.65 26.039 26.003 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C12-C11 0.007 3.18 27.493 27.303 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C11-C10 0.006 0.89 27.173 27.056 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C10-C9 0.033 1.47 27.027 26.94 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B9-B8 0.03 1.37 28.674 28.612 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B8-B7 0.03 1.97 28.55 28.185 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B7-B6 0.032 2.33 28.144 27.575 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B6-B5 0.032 1.83 27.26 26.541 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe S1-C10 0.027 2.32 27.076 27.056 AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe U1-C8 0 0 26.31 26.3 AR&R 6 year, 5 minutes storm, average 57.75 mm/h, Zone 1
CHANNEL DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s)
OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS
Name Max Q U/S Max Q D/S Safe Q Max D Max DxV Max Width Max V Due to Storm
OF P2 0 0 0.464 0 0 0 0
OF P1 0 0 1.434 0 0 0 0
OF T1 0 0 0.614 0 0 0 0
OF K2 0 0 0.294 0 0 0 0
OF K1 0 0 0.299 0 0 0 0
OF A4 0 0 0.743 0 0 0 0
OF A6 0 0 0.375 0 0 0 0
OF D5 0 0 0.908 0 0 0 0
OF D4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OF D3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OF D2 0 0 1.347 0 0 0 0
OF G2 0 0 0.414 0 0 0 0
OF G1 0 0 0.315 0 0 0 0
OF A7 0 0 0.343 0 0 0 0
OF A8 0 0 0.709 0 0 0 0
OF A10 0 0 0.421 0 0 0 0
OF A9 0 0 1.284 0 0 0 0
OF E3 0 0 0.548 0 0 0 0
OF E1 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0
OF Q4 0 0 0.316 0 0 0 0
OF Q3 0 0 0.343 0 0 0 0
OF Q1 0 0 0.221 0 0 0 0
OF F5 0 0 1.181 0 0 0 0
OF F4 0 0 1.225 0 0 0 0
OF F3 0 0 1.212 0 0 0 0
OF F2 0 0 1.275 0 0 0 0
OF F1 0 0 1.31 0 0 0 0
OF C5 0 0 0.058 0 0 0 0
OF R1 0 0 1.35 0 0 0 0
OF C6-E1 0 0 0.391 0 0 0 0
OF N1 0 0 0.485 0 0 0 0
OF C9 0 0 1.252 0 0 0 0
OF C8 0 0 0.176 0 0 0 0
OF C12 0 0 1.131 0 0 0 0
OF C11 0 0 1.232 0 0 0 0
OF C10 0 0 1.265 0 0 0 0
OF B8 0 0 1.434 0 0 0 0
OF B7 0 0 1.422 0 0 0 0
OF B6 0 0 1.134 0 0 0 0
DETENTION BASIN DETAILS
Name Max WL MaxVol Max Q Max Q Max Q
Total Low Level High Level
CONTINUITY CHECK for AR&R 6 year, 25 minutes storm, average 28.8 mm/h, Zone 1
Node Inflow Outflow Storage ChangeDifference
(cu.m) (cu.m) (cu.m) %
Pit P2 5.83 5.83 0 0.1
Pit P1 9.8 9.22 0 5.9
Pit A3 (HUMES) 71.1 71.07 0 0
Pit A2 (SPEL) 71.07 71.08 0 0
Pit A1 71.08 70.99 0 0.1
G07/01 70.99 70.99 0 0
Pit T1 2.42 2.42 0 0
Pit B1 66.88 67.13 0 -0.4
G06/01 67.13 67.13 0 0
Pit K2 2.63 2.62 0 0.3
Pit K1 11.75 11.71 0 0.3
Pit A5 57.24 57.44 0 -0.3
Pit A4 61.77 61.88 0 -0.2
Pit M1 2.1 2.1 0 0
Node J2 10.83 10.83 0 0.1
Pit J1 10.83 10.85 0 -0.2
Pit A6 35.52 35.19 0 0.9
Pit D5 2.69 2.69 0 -0.1
Pit D4 2.69 2.71 0 -0.7
Pit D3 9.47 9.48 0 -0.1
Pit D2 10.42 10.36 0 0.6
Pit D1 10.36 10.34 0 0.2
Pit G2 2.24 2.2 0 1.5
Pit G1 2.93 2.97 0 -1.4
Pit A7 12.24 12.28 0 -0.4
Pit H1 1.96 1.98 0 -1.1
Pit A8 9.24 9.27 0 -0.2
Pit A10 3.13 3.13 0 0.3
Pit A9 7.22 7.16 0 0.9
Node L1 41.89 41.92 0 -0.1
Pit B5 64.72 64.69 0 0
Pit B4 (HUMES) 64.69 64.7 0 0
Pit B3 (SPEL) 64.7 64.69 0 0
Pit B2 64.69 64.46 0 0.3
Pit E3 13.3 13.29 0 0.1
Pit E2 13.29 13.3 0 -0.1
Pit E1 28.01 27.99 0 0.1
Pit204517 85.65 85.63 0 0
Pit C3 (HUMES)122.71 122.75 0 0
Pit C2 (SPEL) 122.75 122.73 0 0
Pit C1 122.73 122.71 0 0
G05/01 122.71 122.71 0 0
Pit Q4 11.67 11.66 0 0.1
Pit Q3 25.05 25.04 0 0
Pit Q2 37.1 37.1 0 0
Pit Q1 37.1 37.08 0 0.1
Pit F5 3 3 0 0.1
Pit F4 7.27 7.28 0 -0.1
Pit F3 11.63 11.63 0 0
Pit F2 16.13 16.11 0 0.1
Pit F1 20.62 20.63 0 -0.1
Pit C5 57.62 57.66 0 -0.1
Pit R1 2.66 2.67 0 0
Pit C7 30.77 30.8 0 -0.1
Pit C6 37.05 36.99 0 0.2
Pit N1 0 0 0 0
Pit C9 23.95 23.92 0 0.1
Pit C8 28.05 28.1 0 -0.2
Pit C12 4.64 4.59 0 1.1
Pit C11 4.59 4.67 0 -1.6
Pit C10 23.95 23.95 0 0
Node B9 21.17 21.17 0 0
Pit B8 21.17 21.12 0 0.2
Pit B7 22.74 22.78 0 -0.2
Pit B6 22.78 22.8 0 -0.1
Node S1 19.28 19.28 0 0
Node Low D3 0 0 0 0
N G04/06 0 0 0 0
G01/08 0 0 0 0
F01/15 0 0 0 0
Node Low D5 0 0 0 0
Pit U1 0 0 0 0
N Bypass 1 0.89 0.89 0 0
N Bypass 2 0.47 0.47 0 0
\par }
Run Log for 388057 2017 run at 16:59:29 on 17/10/2017{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red255\green0\blue0;}No water upwelling from any
pit. Freeboard was adequate at all pits.\line Flows were safe in all overflow routes.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 26 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
C. 10yr ARI DRAINS Results
DRAINS results prepared from Version 2017.11
PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 8
Name Max HGL Max Pond Max SurfaceMax Pond Min Overflow Constraint
HGL Flow ArrivingVolume Freeboard (cu.m/s)
(cu.m/s) (cu.m) (m)
Pit P2 27.01 0.021 0.39 0.001 Inlet Capacity
Pit P1 26.94 0.014 0.9 0 None
Pit A3 (HUMES) 26.84 0 1.01 None
Pit A2 (SPEL) 26.45 0 1.27 None
Pit A1 26.2 0 1.41 None
G07/01 26.16 0
Pit T1 26.31 0.009 0.79 0 None
Pit B1 26.04 0 0.91 None
G06/01 25.96 0.001
Pit K2 27.4 0.009 0.56 0 None
Pit K1 27.39 28.09 0.026 0.5 0.62 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit A5 27.35 0 1.11 None
Pit A4 27.1 0.015 0.96 0 None
Pit M1 27.41 0.007 0.8 None
Node J2 28.15 0.038
Pit J1 28.13 0 0.84 None
Pit A6 27.55 0.047 0.98 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D5 28.1 28.6 0.01 0.1 0.49 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D4 27.89 0 0.81 0 None
Pit D3 27.73 28.58 0.025 0.2 0.82 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D2 27.46 0.003 1.16 0 None
Pit D1 27.37 0 1.43 None
Pit G2 28.65 0.008 0.79 0 None
Pit G1 28.47 0.003 0.69 0 None
Pit A7 27.88 0 1.34 0 None
Pit H1 28.58 0.009 0.64 None
Pit A8 28.05 0 1.2 0 None
Pit A10 28.42 0.014 0.46 0 None
Pit A9 28.34 0.017 0.74 0 Inlet Capacity
Node L1 27.25 0.149
Pit B5 26.87 0 0.48 None
Pit B4 (HUMES) 26.67 0 0.63 None
Pit B3 (SPEL) 26.61 0 0.63 None
Pit B2 26.24 0 0.96 None
Pit E3 25.77 26.1 0.049 0.3 0.26 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit E2 25.67 26.11 0.007 0 0.43 Inlet Capacity
Pit E1 25.65 26.1 0.054 0.3 0.37 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit204517 25.57 0 0.58 None
Pit C3 (HUMES) 25.46 0 0.91 None
Pit C2 (SPEL) 25.39 0 0.91 None
Pit C1 25.34 0 0.71 None
G05/01 25.18 0
Pit Q4 26.22 0.043 0.4 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit Q3 25.89 0.049 0.55 0.001 Inlet Capacity
Pit Q2 25.76 0.045 0.48 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit Q1 25.6 0 0.75 None
Pit F5 26.54 0.011 0.66 0 None
Pit F4 26.5 0.016 0.56 0 None
Pit F3 26.46 0.016 0.44 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit F2 26.36 0.016 0.35 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit F1 26.17 0.016 0.37 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit C5 26.09 0.002 0.36 0 None
Pit R1 26.38 0.01 0.5 0 None
Pit C7 26.35 0 0.45 None
Pit C6 26.23 0.023 0.31 0 None
Pit N1 27.07 0 0.41 0 None
Pit C9 27.06 0 0.58 0 None
Pit C8 26.43 0.016 0.5 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit C12 27.59 0.016 0.44 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit C11 27.23 0 0.77 0 None
Pit C10 27.19 0 0.63 0 None
Node B9 28.76 0.075
Pit B8 28.71 0 0.54 0 None
Pit B7 28.26 0.006 0.48 0 None
Pit B6 27.42 0 0.75 0 None
Node S1 27.21 0.068
Pit U1 26.43 0 0.63 None
SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS
Name Max Paved Grassed Paved Grassed Supp. Due to Storm
Flow Q Max Q Max Q Tc Tc Tc
(cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (min) (min) (min)
Cat P2 0.021 0.021 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat P1 0.014 0.014 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat T1 0.009 0.009 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K2 0.009 0.009 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K1 0.026 0.025 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A4 0.015 0.015 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat M1 0.007 0.007 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat J2 0.038 0.038 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A6 0.047 0.044 0.003 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D5 0.01 0.01 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D3 0.025 0.024 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D2 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G2 0.008 0.008 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G1 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat H1 0.009 0.007 0.002 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A8 0 0 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A10 0.014 0.011 0.003 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A9 0.017 0.015 0.002 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat L1 0.149 0.149 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E3 0.049 0.047 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E2 0.007 0 0.007 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 2 hours storm, average 29 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E1 0.054 0.052 0.002 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q4 0.043 0.041 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q3 0.049 0.047 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q2 0.044 0.043 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F5 0.011 0.011 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F4 0.016 0.015 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F3 0.016 0.015 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F2 0.016 0.016 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F1 0.016 0.016 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C5 0.002 0 0.002 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 2 hours storm, average 29 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat R1 0.01 0.009 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C6 0.023 0.022 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C8 0.016 0.015 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C12 0.016 0.016 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B9 0.075 0.075 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B7 0.006 0.006 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat S1 0.068 0.068 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 1 0.003 0.003 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 2 0.002 0.002 0 5 10 0 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Outflow Volumes for Total Catchment (2.39 impervious + 0.14 pervious = 2.53 total ha)
Storm Total RainfallTotal RunoffImpervious RunoffPervious Runoff
cu.m cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)
AR&R 10 year, 5 minutes storm, average 146 mm/h, Zone 1307.51 270.61 (88.0%)266.93 (91.8%)3.68 (22.1%)
AR&R 10 year, 10 minutes storm, average 111 mm/h, Zone 1467.59 428.02 (91.5%)418.33 (94.6%)9.69 (38.2%)
AR&R 10 year, 15 minutes storm, average 93 mm/h, Zone 1587.64 545.98 (92.9%)531.87 (95.7%)14.11 (44.3%)
AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1682.43 639.05 (93.6%)621.51 (96.3%)17.53 (47.4%)
AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1758.25 712.76 (94.0%)693.23 (96.7%)19.53 (47.5%)
AR&R 10 year, 30 minutes storm, average 65 mm/h, Zone 1821.44 773.98 (94.2%)752.99 (96.9%)20.99 (47.1%)
AR&R 10 year, 45 minutes storm, average 52 mm/h, Zone 1985.72 934.14 (94.8%)908.37 (97.4%)25.77 (48.2%)
AR&R 10 year, 1 hour storm, average 44.1 mm/h, Zone 11114.61 1059.55 (95.1%)1030.26 (97.7%)29.29 (48.5%)
AR&R 10 year, 1.5 hours storm, average 34.6 mm/h, Zone 11311.81 1250.91 (95.4%)1216.77 (98.1%)34.14 (48.0%)
AR&R 10 year, 2 hours storm, average 29 mm/h, Zone 11465.95 1400.42 (95.5%)1362.55 (98.3%)37.87 (47.6%)
AR&R 10 year, 3 hours storm, average 22.6 mm/h, Zone 11713.64 1641.01 (95.8%)1596.79 (98.5%)44.21 (47.6%)
PIPE DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Max U/S Max D/S Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s) HGL (m) HGL (m)
Pipe P2-P1 0.02 0.5 26.958 26.938 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe P1-P3 0.034 0.86 26.882 26.845 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A3-A2 0.241 2.37 26.73 26.71 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A2-A1 0.241 1.11 26.201 26.198 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A1-G7/01 0.241 0.67 26.168 26.16 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe T1-B1 0.009 2.2 26.255 26.239 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B1-G06/01 0.223 1.4 25.99 25.962 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K2-K1 0.009 0.25 27.391 27.391 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K1-A5 0.041 0.6 27.361 27.352 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A5-A4 0.198 1.66 27.186 27.101 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A4-A3 0.211 3.26 26.882 26.845 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe M1-K1 0.007 0.49 27.39 27.391 AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J2-J1 0.038 1.14 28.147 28.127 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J1-A6 0.037 5.29 27.952 27.863 AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A6-A5 0.125 1.13 27.483 27.352 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D5-D4 0.011 2.26 28.05 27.889 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D4-D3 0.01 1.01 27.867 27.73 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D3-D2 0.033 1.42 27.68 27.457 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D2-D1 0.036 1.44 27.404 27.37 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D1-A5 0.039 0.46 27.358 27.352 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G2-G1 0.008 4.92 28.599 28.472 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G1-A7 0.011 1.62 28.43 28.386 AR&R 10 year, 15 minutes storm, average 93 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A7-A6 0.05 4.02 27.75 27.554 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe H1-A8 0.009 3.42 28.526 28.429 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A8-A7 0.041 2 27.97 27.878 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A10-A9 0.014 1.14 28.369 28.339 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A9-A8 0.031 1.51 28.279 28.049 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe L1-B5 0.148 3.73 27.248 26.865 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B5-B4 0.216 1.44 26.74 26.67 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B4-B3 0.215 1.56 26.604 26.614 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B3-B2 0.215 1.35 26.242 26.236 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B2-B1 0.215 1.35 26.096 26.04 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E3-E2 0.048 0.69 25.675 25.669 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E2-E1 0.054 0.77 25.654 25.646 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E1-C1 0.108 0.98 25.573 25.568 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C4-C3 0.307 1.43 25.436 25.458 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C3-C2 0.44 1.82 25.369 25.387 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C2-C1 0.44 1.23 25.348 25.344 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C1-G05/01 0.44 1.23 25.191 25.178 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q4-Q3 0.042 1.07 25.987 25.893 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q3-Q2 0.09 1.28 25.852 25.757 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q2-Q1 0.135 1.22 25.643 25.595 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q1-C3 0.134 1.22 25.482 25.458 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F5-F4 0.011 0.6 26.507 26.504 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F4-F3 0.026 0.66 26.495 26.463 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F3-F2 0.04 1.02 26.437 26.355 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F2-F1 0.056 1.4 26.306 26.171 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F1-C5 0.071 1.01 26.145 26.094 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C5-C4 0.201 3.43 25.757 25.568 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe R1-C7 0.01 0.48 26.354 26.353 AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C7-C6 0.107 0.97 26.26 26.228 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C6-C5 0.128 1.16 26.127 26.094 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe N1-C9 0.003 0.11 27.066 27.06 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C9-C8 0.095 3.21 26.911 26.431 AR&R 10 year, 15 minutes storm, average 93 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C8-C7 0.098 0.89 26.374 26.353 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C12-C11 0.017 4.23 27.505 27.335 AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C11-C10 0.016 1.11 27.209 27.191 AR&R 10 year, 20 minutes storm, average 81 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C10-C9 0.086 1.52 27.144 27.06 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B9-B8 0.075 1.57 28.762 28.713 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B8-B7 0.075 3.09 28.582 28.262 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B7-B6 0.08 3.01 28.191 27.622 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B6-B5 0.08 2.27 27.313 26.865 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe S1-C10 0.069 1.8 27.206 27.191 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe U1-C8 0 0 26.431 26.431 AR&R 10 year, 15 minutes storm, average 93 mm/h, Zone 1
CHANNEL DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s)
OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS
Name Max Q U/S Max Q D/S Safe Q Max D Max DxV Max Width Max V Due to Storm
OF P2 0.001 0.001 0.464 0.02 0.01 0.23 0.57 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
OF P1 0 0 1.434 0 0 0 0
OF T1 0 0 0.614 0 0 0 0
OF K2 0 0 0.294 0 0 0 0
OF K1 0 0 0.299 0 0 0 0
OF A4 0 0 0.743 0 0 0 0
OF A6 0 0 0.375 0 0 0 0
OF D5 0 0 0.908 0 0 0 0
OF D4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OF D3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OF D2 0 0 1.347 0 0 0 0
OF G2 0 0 0.414 0 0 0 0
OF G1 0 0 0.315 0 0 0 0
OF A7 0 0 0.343 0 0 0 0
OF A8 0 0 0.709 0 0 0 0
OF A10 0 0 0.421 0 0 0 0
OF A9 0 0 1.284 0 0 0 0
OF E3 0 0 0.548 0 0 0 0
OF E1 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0
OF Q4 0 0 0.316 0 0 0 0
OF Q3 0.001 0.001 0.343 0.019 0.01 0.22 0.4 AR&R 10 year, 25 minutes storm, average 72 mm/h, Zone 1
OF Q1 0 0 0.221 0 0 0 0
OF F5 0 0 1.181 0 0 0 0
OF F4 0 0 1.225 0 0 0 0
OF F3 0 0 1.212 0 0 0 0
OF F2 0 0 1.275 0 0 0 0
OF F1 0 0 1.31 0 0 0 0
OF C5 0 0 0.058 0 0 0 0
OF R1 0 0 1.35 0 0 0 0
OF C6-E1 0 0 0.391 0 0 0 0
OF N1 0 0 0.485 0 0 0 0
OF C9 0 0 1.252 0 0 0 0
OF C8 0 0 0.176 0 0 0 0
OF C12 0 0 1.131 0 0 0 0
OF C11 0 0 1.232 0 0 0 0
OF C10 0 0 1.265 0 0 0 0
OF B8 0 0 1.434 0 0 0 0
OF B7 0 0 1.422 0 0 0 0
OF B6 0 0 1.134 0 0 0 0
DETENTION BASIN DETAILS
Name Max WL MaxVol Max Q Max Q Max Q
Total Low Level High Level
CONTINUITY CHECK for AR&R 10 year, 2 hours storm, average 29 mm/h, Zone 1
Node Inflow Outflow Storage ChangeDifference
(cu.m) (cu.m) (cu.m) %
Pit P2 30.99 31 0 0
Pit P1 51.48 50.93 0 1.1
Pit A3 (HUMES)387.61 387.67 0 0
Pit A2 (SPEL) 387.67 387.66 0 0
Pit A1 387.66 387.68 0 0
G07/01 387.68 387.68 0 0
Pit T1 12.54 12.54 0 0
Pit B1 348.14 348.15 0 0
G06/01 348.25 348.25 0 0
Pit K2 13.62 13.62 0 0
Pit K1 61.83 61.83 0 0
Pit A5 313.15 313.87 0 -0.2
Pit A4 336.33 336.67 0 -0.1
Pit M1 10.89 10.89 0 0
Node J2 56.14 56.14 0 0
Pit J1 56.14 56.14 0 0
Pit A6 196.09 196.02 0 0
Pit D5 14.27 14.33 0 -0.4
Pit D4 14.33 14.32 0 0.1
Pit D3 50.24 50.31 0 -0.1
Pit D2 55.15 55.36 0 -0.4
Pit D1 55.36 55.3 0 0.1
Pit G2 11.88 11.88 0 0
Pit G1 15.64 15.71 0 -0.4
Pit A7 71.94 72.27 0 -0.5
Pit H1 12.24 12.28 0 -0.3
Pit A8 56.08 56.23 0 -0.3
Pit A10 19.61 19.61 0 0
Pit A9 43.39 43.23 0 0.4
Node L1 217.06 217.2 0 -0.1
Pit B5 335.54 335.55 0 0
Pit B4 (HUMES)335.55 335.58 0 0
Pit B3 (SPEL) 335.58 335.59 0 0
Pit B2 335.59 335.6 0 0
Pit E3 70.69 70.73 0 0
Pit E2 78.41 78.45 0 0
Pit E1 156.63 156.69 0 0
Pit204517 462.94 463.12 0 0
Pit C3 (HUMES)660.69 660.77 0 0
Pit C2 (SPEL) 660.77 660.83 0 0
Pit C1 660.83 660.81 0 0
G05/01 660.81 660.81 0 0
Pit Q4 62.03 62.07 0 -0.1
Pit Q3 133.21 133.28 0 -0.1
Pit Q2 197.36 197.49 0 -0.1
Pit Q1 197.49 197.56 0 0
Pit F5 15.94 15.95 0 -0.1
Pit F4 38.66 38.71 0 -0.1
Pit F3 61.86 61.88 0 0
Pit F2 85.76 85.8 0 0
Pit F1 109.73 109.82 0 -0.1
Pit C5 306.14 306.25 0 0
Pit R1 14.21 14.21 0 0
Pit C7 160.9 161.54 0 -0.4
Pit C6 194.74 194.54 0 0.1
Pit N1 0 0.03 0 0
Pit C9 124.13 124.37 0 -0.2
Pit C8 146.92 146.73 0 0.1
Pit C12 24.05 23.94 0 0.5
Pit C11 23.94 24.11 0 -0.7
Pit C10 123.99 124.1 0 -0.1
Node B9 109.73 109.73 0 0
Pit B8 109.73 109.72 0 0
Pit B7 118.1 118.2 0 -0.1
Pit B6 118.2 118.34 0 -0.1
Node S1 99.92 99.87 0 0.1
Node Low D3 0 0 0 0
N G04/06 0 0 0 0
G01/08 0 0 0 0
F01/15 0 0 0 0
Node Low D5 0 0 0 0
Pit U1 0 0 0 0
N Bypass 1 4.62 4.62 0 0
N Bypass 2 2.45 2.45 0 0
\par }
Run Log for 388057 2017 run at 17:02:23 on 17/10/2017{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red255\green0\blue0;}No water upwelling from any pit.
Freeboard was adequate at all pits.\line Flows were safe in all overflow routes.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 27 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
D. 100yr ARI DRAINS Results
DRAINS results prepared from Version 2017.11
PIT / NODE DETAILS Version 8
Name Max HGL Max Pond Max SurfaceMax Pond Min Overflow Constraint
HGL Flow ArrivingVolume Freeboard (cu.m/s)
(cu.m/s) (cu.m) (m)
Pit P2 27.41 0.033 0 0.039 Outlet System
Pit P1 27.68 0.021 0.16 0.002 Inlet Capacity
Pit A3 (HUMES) 27.65 0 0.2 None
Pit A2 (SPEL) 27.59 0 0.13 None
Pit A1 27.37 0 0.24 None
G07/01 27.34 0.098
Pit T1 27.04 0.013 0.06 0 None
Pit B1 27.02 0 0 Outlet System
G06/01 26.87 0.04
Pit K2 27.96 0.016 0 0.047 Outlet System
Pit K1 28.11 28.11 0.048 0.9 0 0.052 Outlet System
Pit A5 28.15 0 0.31 None
Pit A4 27.92 0.023 0.14 0.003 Inlet Capacity
Pit M1 28.14 0.011 0.07 None
Node J2 29.07 0.057
Pit J1 29.03 0 0 Outlet System
Pit A6 28.51 0.067 0.02 0.01 Inlet Capacity
Pit D5 28.59 28.63 0.014 0.2 0 0 Outlet System
Pit D4 28.5 0 0.2 0 None
Pit D3 28.35 28.63 0.036 0.5 0.2 0 Inlet Capacity
Pit D2 28.3 0.005 0.32 0 None
Pit D1 28.21 0 0.59 None
Pit G2 28.82 0.012 0.62 0 None
Pit G1 28.78 0.004 0.38 0 None
Pit A7 28.76 0 0.46 0 None
Pit H1 28.86 0.012 0.36 None
Pit A8 28.83 0.001 0.42 0 None
Pit A10 28.87 0.023 0.01 0.01 Inlet Capacity
Pit A9 28.87 0.023 0.21 0.003 Inlet Capacity
Node L1 29.41 0.219
Pit B5 28.57 0 0 Outlet System
Pit B4 (HUMES) 28.21 0 0 Outlet System
Pit B3 (SPEL) 28.11 0 0 Outlet System
Pit B2 27.4 0 0 Outlet System
Pit E3 26.12 26.18 0.167 0.9 0 0.144 Outlet System
Pit E2 26.11 26.16 0.017 0.3 0 Outlet System
Pit E1 26.1 26.17 0.181 0.9 0 0.151 Outlet System
Pit204517 26.08 0 0.07 None
Pit C3 (HUMES) 26.03 0 0.34 None
Pit C2 (SPEL) 25.99 0 0.31 None
Pit C1 25.96 0 0.09 None
G05/01 25.86 0.291
Pit Q4 26.61 0.062 0.01 0.029 Inlet Capacity
Pit Q3 26.42 0.101 0.02 0.03 Inlet Capacity
Pit Q2 26.24 0.11 0 0.088 Outlet System
Pit Q1 26.13 0 0.22 None
Pit F5 27.1 0.016 0.1 0.001 Inlet Capacity
Pit F4 27.04 0.068 0.02 0.032 Inlet Capacity
Pit F3 26.9 0.028 0 0.019 Inlet Capacity
Pit F2 26.71 0.024 0 0.02 Outlet System
Pit F1 26.53 0.029 0.01 0.01 Inlet Capacity
Pit C5 26.45 0.003 0 0.007 Outlet System
Pit R1 26.86 0.029 0.02 0.006 Inlet Capacity
Pit C7 26.79 0 0.01 None
Pit C6 26.54 0.033 0 0.076 Outlet System
Pit N1 27.48 0 0 0.007 Outlet System
Pit C9 27.52 0 0.12 0 None
Pit C8 26.92 0.029 0.01 0.015 Inlet Capacity
Pit C12 28.01 0.024 0.02 0.005 Inlet Capacity
Pit C11 27.89 0 0.11 0 None
Pit C10 27.82 0 0 0.005 Outlet System
Node B9 29.14 0.111
Pit B8 29.06 0 0.19 0 None
Pit B7 28.74 0.008 0 0.046 Outlet System
Pit B6 28.67 0.046 0 0.046 Outlet System
Node S1 27.85 0.101
Pit U1 26.92 0 0.14 None
SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS
Name Max Paved Grassed Paved Grassed Supp. Due to Storm
Flow Q Max Q Max Q Tc Tc Tc
(cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (cu.m/s) (min) (min) (min)
Cat P2 0.031 0.03 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat P1 0.021 0.021 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat T1 0.013 0.013 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K2 0.014 0.014 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat K1 0.037 0.037 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A4 0.023 0.023 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat M1 0.011 0.011 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat J2 0.057 0.057 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A6 0.067 0.065 0.002 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D5 0.014 0.014 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D3 0.036 0.035 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat D2 0.005 0.005 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G2 0.012 0.012 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat G1 0.004 0.004 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat H1 0.012 0.009 0.003 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A8 0.001 0.001 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A10 0.02 0.015 0.005 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat A9 0.023 0.02 0.004 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat L1 0.219 0.219 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E3 0.071 0.07 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E2 0.011 0 0.011 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 121 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat E1 0.078 0.077 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q4 0.062 0.061 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q3 0.071 0.07 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Q2 0.064 0.063 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F5 0.016 0.016 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F4 0.023 0.022 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F3 0.023 0.023 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F2 0.024 0.023 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat F1 0.024 0.024 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C5 0.003 0 0.003 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 121 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat R1 0.014 0.014 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C6 0.033 0.033 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C8 0.022 0.022 0.001 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat C12 0.024 0.024 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B9 0.111 0.111 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat B7 0.008 0.008 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat S1 0.101 0.101 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 1 0.005 0.005 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Cat Bypass 2 0.002 0.002 0 5 10 0 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Outflow Volumes for Total Catchment (2.39 impervious + 0.14 pervious = 2.53 total ha)
Storm Total RainfallTotal RunoffImpervious RunoffPervious Runoff
cu.m cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)cu.m (Runoff %)
AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1461.27 424.18 (92.0%)412.35 (94.5%)11.83 (47.3%)
AR&R 100 year, 10 minutes storm, average 167 mm/h, Zone 1703.49 663.65 (94.3%)641.43 (96.4%)22.22 (58.2%)
AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1878.31 836.20 (95.2%)806.77 (97.1%)29.43 (61.8%)
AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 121 mm/h, Zone 11019.43 975.38 (95.7%)940.24 (97.5%)35.14 (63.6%)
AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 11137.38 1091.12 (95.9%)1051.80 (97.8%)39.33 (63.8%)
AR&R 100 year, 30 minutes storm, average 98 mm/h, Zone 11238.47 1190.42 (96.1%)1147.41 (98.0%)43.01 (64.0%)
AR&R 100 year, 45 minutes storm, average 78 mm/h, Zone 11478.61 1426.17 (96.5%)1374.53 (98.3%)51.64 (64.4%)
AR&R 100 year, 1 hour storm, average 66 mm/h, Zone 11668.15 1612.22 (96.6%)1553.78 (98.5%)58.44 (64.6%)
AR&R 100 year, 1.5 hours storm, average 52 mm/h, Zone 11971.45 1909.90 (96.9%)1840.64 (98.7%)69.26 (64.8%)
AR&R 100 year, 2 hours storm, average 43.4 mm/h, Zone 12193.85 2127.73 (97.0%)2050.97 (98.8%)76.76 (64.5%)
AR&R 100 year, 3 hours storm, average 33.8 mm/h, Zone 12562.95 2488.79 (97.1%)2400.03 (99.0%)88.76 (63.9%)
PIPE DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Max U/S Max D/S Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s) HGL (m) HGL (m)
Pipe P2-P1 0.008 0.19 27.661 27.682 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe P1-P3 0.015 0.38 27.675 27.651 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A3-A2 0.225 1.04 27.596 27.594 AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A2-A1 0.226 1.05 27.375 27.371 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A1-G7/01 0.228 0.64 27.344 27.338 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe T1-B1 0.013 0.32 27.022 27.022 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B1-G06/01 0.309 1.94 26.927 26.874 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K2-K1 0.012 0.31 27.96 28.11 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe K1-A5 0.04 0.56 28.11 28.154 AR&R 100 year, 10 minutes storm, average 167 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A5-A4 0.194 1.22 27.963 27.924 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A4-A3 0.214 1.34 27.74 27.651 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe M1-K1 0.012 0.3 28.129 28.11 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J2-J1 0.057 1.43 29.07 29.028 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe J1-A6 0.057 1.44 28.657 28.505 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A6-A5 0.169 1.53 28.267 28.154 AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D5-D4 0.018 0.46 28.567 28.501 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D4-D3 0.02 0.28 28.498 28.347 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D3-D2 0.065 0.59 28.337 28.298 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D2-D1 0.066 0.6 28.274 28.212 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe D1-A5 0.073 0.66 28.195 28.154 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G2-G1 0.012 0.31 28.799 28.782 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe G1-A7 0.017 0.44 28.768 28.76 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A7-A6 0.063 0.9 28.649 28.505 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe H1-A8 0.014 0.34 28.838 28.83 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A8-A7 0.05 0.7 28.778 28.76 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A10-A9 0.028 0.4 28.864 28.865 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe A9-A8 0.049 0.69 28.844 28.83 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe L1-B5 0.219 5.51 29.408 28.566 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B5-B4 0.295 1.86 28.214 28.205 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B4-B3 0.295 1.86 28.117 28.106 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B3-B2 0.296 1.86 27.399 27.396 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B2-B1 0.296 1.86 27.132 27.022 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E3-E2 0.033 0.47 26.114 26.113 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E2-E1 0.039 0.55 26.107 26.104 AR&R 100 year, 1.5 hours storm, average 52 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe E1-C1 0.072 0.65 26.086 26.085 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C4-C3 0.228 0.81 26.035 26.027 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C3-C2 0.341 1.21 25.989 25.985 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C2-C1 0.341 0.95 25.962 25.96 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C1-G05/01 0.341 0.95 25.871 25.86 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q4-Q3 0.038 0.96 26.47 26.415 AR&R 100 year, 1.5 hours storm, average 52 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q3-Q2 0.104 1.46 26.36 26.24 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q2-Q1 0.117 1.06 26.159 26.125 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe Q1-C3 0.117 1.06 26.044 26.027 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F5-F4 0.015 0.38 27.072 27.045 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F4-F3 0.047 1.17 27.012 26.897 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F3-F2 0.053 1.33 26.855 26.71 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F2-F1 0.056 1.42 26.66 26.527 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe F1-C5 0.072 1.02 26.508 26.452 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C5-C4 0.175 1.59 26.224 26.085 AR&R 100 year, 10 minutes storm, average 167 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe R1-C7 0.022 0.56 26.795 26.787 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C7-C6 0.149 1.35 26.612 26.54 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C6-C5 0.113 1.02 26.474 26.452 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe N1-C9 0.004 0.09 27.48 27.522 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C9-C8 0.117 1.66 27.242 26.922 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C8-C7 0.129 1.17 26.821 26.787 AR&R 100 year, 20 minutes storm, average 121 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C12-C11 0.022 0.56 27.961 27.89 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C11-C10 0.029 0.72 27.883 27.82 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe C10-C9 0.124 1.75 27.749 27.522 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B9-B8 0.111 1.57 29.137 29.055 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B8-B7 0.111 1.57 28.905 28.74 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B7-B6 0.098 1.39 28.713 28.673 AR&R 100 year, 2 hours storm, average 43.4 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe B6-B5 0.1 0.91 28.627 28.566 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe S1-C10 0.101 2.54 27.854 27.82 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
Pipe U1-C8 0 0 26.922 26.922 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
CHANNEL DETAILS
Name Max Q Max V Due to Storm
(cu.m/s) (m/s)
OVERFLOW ROUTE DETAILS
Name Max Q U/S Max Q D/S Safe Q Max D Max DxV Max Width Max V Due to Storm
OF P2 0.039 0.039 0.802 0.067 0.08 1.35 1.19 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF P1 0.002 0.002 1.434 0.01 0 1.04 0.4 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF T1 0 0 0.656 0 0 0 0
OF K2 0.047 0.047 1.046 0.082 0.07 1.86 0.82 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF K1 0.052 0.052 1.029 0.083 0.07 1.91 0.85 AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1
OF A4 0.003 0.003 1.497 0.016 0 1.63 0.21 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF A6 0.01 0.01 0.901 0.046 0.04 0.65 0.82 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF D5 0 0 1.479 0 0 0 0
OF D4 0 0 0.288 0 0 0 0
OF D3 0 0 0.204 0 0 0 0
OF D2 0 0 1.453 0 0 0 0
OF G2 0 0 0.849 0 0 0 0
OF G1 0 0 1.011 0 0 0 0
OF A7 0 0 0.958 0 0 0 0
OF A8 0 0 1.493 0 0 0 0
OF A10 0.01 0.01 0.845 0.044 0.04 0.58 0.88 AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1
OF A9 0.003 0.003 1.442 0.013 0 1.33 0.33 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
OF E3 0.144 0.144 0.548 0.088 0.18 2.06 2.07 AR&R 100 year, 15 minutes storm, average 139 mm/h, Zone 1
OF E1 0.151 0.151 0.872 0.108 0.14 2.72 1.29 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF Q4 0.029 0.029 0.999 0.068 0.06 1.4 0.81 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF Q3 0.03 0.03 0.958 0.067 0.06 1.37 0.87 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF Q1 0.088 0.088 1.227 0.11 0.08 2.79 0.72 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF F5 0.001 0.001 1.449 0.008 0 0.84 0.22 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF F4 0.032 0.032 1.448 0.03 0.02 4 0.53 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF F3 0.019 0.019 1.45 0.026 0.01 4 0.43 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF F2 0.02 0.02 1.45 0.026 0.01 4 0.45 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF F1 0.01 0.01 1.451 0.022 0.01 4 0.36 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF C5 0.007 0.007 0.172 0.045 0.01 1.07 0.28 AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
OF R1 0.006 0.006 1.35 0.012 0.01 1.23 0.73 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF C6-E1 0.076 0.076 0.886 0.087 0.1 2.02 1.14 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF N1 0.007 0.007 0.768 0.036 0.03 0.42 0.89 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF C9 0 0 1.461 0 0 0 0
OF C8 0.015 0.015 1.387 0.066 0.03 1.33 0.46 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF C12 0.005 0.005 1.457 0.017 0.01 1.73 0.34 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF C11 0 0 1.456 0 0 0 0
OF C10 0.005 0.005 1.457 0.016 0.01 1.63 0.35 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF B8 0 0 1.434 0 0 0 0
OF B7 0.046 0.046 1.422 0.03 0.02 4 0.76 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
OF B6 0.046 0.046 1.462 0.034 0.02 4 0.61 AR&R 100 year, 5 minutes storm, average 219 mm/h, Zone 1
DETENTION BASIN DETAILS
Name Max WL MaxVol Max Q Max Q Max Q
Total Low Level High Level
CONTINUITY CHECK for AR&R 100 year, 25 minutes storm, average 108 mm/h, Zone 1
Node Inflow Outflow Storage ChangeDifference
(cu.m) (cu.m) (cu.m) %
Pit P2 24.54 24.48 0 0.2
Pit P1 12.33 12.36 0 -0.3
Pit A3 (HUMES)243.37 243.36 0 0
Pit A2 (SPEL) 243.36 243.36 0 0
Pit A1 243.36 243.37 0 0
G07/01 273.7 273.7 0 0
Pit T1 9.68 9.64 0 0.4
Pit B1 266.73 266.74 0 0
G06/01 294.78 294.78 0 0
Pit K2 11.15 11.16 0 -0.1
Pit K1 33.88 33.94 0 -0.2
Pit A5 214.72 214.71 0 0
Pit A4 232.05 232.06 0 0
Pit M1 8.4 8.4 0 0
Node J2 43.34 43.33 0 0
Pit J1 43.33 43.24 0 0.2
Pit A6 153.24 153.33 0 -0.1
Pit D5 11.11 11.11 0 0
Pit D4 11.11 11.09 0 0.2
Pit D3 39.06 39.14 0 -0.2
Pit D2 42.88 43.03 0 -0.3
Pit D1 43.03 43.04 0 0
Pit G2 9.25 9.29 0 -0.4
Pit G1 12.2 12.14 0 0.5
Pit A7 56.62 56.83 0 -0.4
Pit H1 10.01 10 0 0.1
Pit A8 44.35 44.48 0 -0.3
Pit A10 16.95 16.91 0 0.2
Pit A9 34.9 34.82 0 0.2
Node L1 167.55 167.53 0 0
Pit B5 257.15 256.94 0 0.1
Pit B4 (HUMES)256.94 256.87 0 0
Pit B3 (SPEL) 256.87 256.94 0 0
Pit B2 256.94 257.09 0 -0.1
Pit E3 80.35 80.49 0 -0.2
Pit E2 41.15 41.14 0 0
Pit E1 132.57 132.63 0 0
Pit204517 283.25 283.25 0 0
Pit C3 (HUMES)414.94 415 0 0
Pit C2 (SPEL) 415 414.88 0 0
Pit C1 414.88 414.99 0 0
G05/01 517.26 517.26 0 0
Pit Q4 48.29 48.29 0 0
Pit Q3 103.74 103.75 0 0
Pit Q2 154.92 154.99 0 0
Pit Q1 131.7 131.69 0 0
Pit F5 12.41 12.38 0 0.2
Pit F4 31.68 31.71 0 -0.1
Pit F3 49.31 49.36 0 -0.1
Pit F2 65.93 65.96 0 0
Pit F1 79.39 79.4 0 0
Pit C5 205.34 205.58 0 -0.1
Pit R1 11.86 11.85 0 0
Pit C7 123.55 123.57 0 0
Pit C6 149.42 149.46 0 0
Pit N1 0 0 0 0
Pit C9 94.81 94.62 0 0.2
Pit C8 112.33 112.64 0 -0.3
Pit C12 18.57 18.48 0 0.5
Pit C11 17.64 17.71 0 -0.4
Pit C10 94.84 94.81 0 0
Node B9 84.7 84.66 0 0
Pit B8 84.66 84.47 0 0.2
Pit B7 90.93 91.08 0 -0.2
Pit B6 91.08 91.3 0 -0.2
Node S1 77.13 77.13 0 0
Node Low D3 0 0 0 0
N G04/06 0 0 0 0
G01/08 0.1 0.1 0 0
F01/15 1.04 1.04 0 0
Node Low D5 0 0 0 0
Pit U1 0 0 0 0
N Bypass 1 3.56 3.56 0 0
N Bypass 2 1.89 1.89 0 0
\par }
Run Log for 388057 2017 run at 17:04:28 on 17/10/2017{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red255\green0\blue0;}Upwelling occurred at: Pit K1, Pit C10, Pit N1,
Pit C6, Pit B7, Pit K2\line Freeboard was inadequate at a further 19 pits.\line Flows were safe in all overflow routes.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 28 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
E. DRAINS Catchment Plan
CL
STREETSTREET HARVEST
HARVEST
NORTHBOURNEDRIVE
NORTHBOURNE
DRIVE
NORTHBOURNE
ELARA
BOULEVARD
BOULEVARDELARA
STREET
PARISH
STREET
PARISH
Catchment area G1
0.0066ha
100% IMP Catchment S1
0.1752ha
100% IMP
Catchment C12
0.0422ha
100% IMP
Catchment B9.2
0.0671ha
100% IMP
Catchment L1
0.3808ha
100% IMP
Catchment B9.1
0.1254ha
100% IMP
Catchment J2
0.0985ha
100% IMP
Catchment D3
0.0647ha
95% IMP
Catchment D5
0.0257ha
95% IMP
Catchment G2
0.0214ha
95% IMP
Catchment A9
0.0465ha
80% IMP
Catchment A10
0.0407ha
70% IMP
Catchment H1
0.0254ha
70% IMPCatchment B7
0.0147ha
100% IMP
Catchment C8
0.0417ha
90% IMP
Catchment C6
0.0598ha
95% IMP
Catchment E1
0.1408ha
95% IMP
Catchment E3
0.1273ha
95% IMP
Catchment Q2
0.1154ha
95% IMP
Catchment Q3
0.1281ha
95% IMP
Catchment Q4
0.1117ha
95% IMP
Catchment A6
0.1252ha
90% IMP
Catchment K1
0.0672ha
95% IMP
Catchment M1
0.0191ha
100% IMP
Catchment K2
0.0239ha
100% IMP
Catchment A4
0.0394ha
100% IMP
Catchment P1
0.0361ha
100% IMP
Catchment P2
0.0558ha
95% IMP
Catchment T1
0.0220ha
100% IMP
Catchment A8
0.0100ha
100% IMP
Catchment area E2
0.0278ha
0% IMP
Catchment area F5
0.0287ha
95% IMP
Catchment area F4
0.0409ha
95% IMP
Catchment area F3
0.0417ha
95% IMP
Catchment area F2
0.0430ha
95% IMP
Catchment area F1
0.0431ha
95% IMP
Catchment area R1
0.0255ha
95% IMP
Catchment area D2
0.0085ha
100% IMP
Catchment area C5
0.0064ha
0% IMP
Catchment area Bypass 1
0.0017ha
100% IMP
Catchment area Bypass 2
0.0042ha
100% IMP
>>
>>
>
> > > > > > > > > >
>
RevStatus
Drawing Number
Scale at A1
Eng check
Approved
Coordination
Dwg check
Drawn
Designed
Security
Client
p:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 working\01 drafting\Civil\Drawings\DA\388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0200.dwg Nov 7, 2017 - 12:06PM KEE75068
App’dCh’k’dDescriptionDrawnDateRev
Project
Title
T
W
was commissioned. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility for this document to any other party other than the person by whom it was commissioned.
This document should not be relied on or used in circumstances other than those for which it was originally prepared and for which Mott MacDonald
© Mott MacDonald
Preliminary - Not for Construction
388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0200
1:400 APR P2 STD
N.McKee
C. Keenan
B. Soo
C.Keenan
D.Chapman
A. Singh
DRAINS Catchment PlanDA Civil WorksElara Boulevard - Marsden ParkElara Neighbourhood Centre
Stockland Development Pty Ltd
www.mottmac.com
+61 (0)2 9098 6800
NSW 1230, Australia
PO Box Q1678, QVB Sydney
Australia
Sydney, NSW 2000
Level 10, 383 Kent Street
JG
BS
CFK
CFKIssued for Information
Issued for Development Application
DRC
DRCP1
P2
07.11.17
18.10.17
01:400
20m 40m
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 29 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
F. MUSIC Catchment Plan
CL
STREETHARVEST
NORTHBOURNE
DRIVE
BOULEVARDELARA
STREET
PARISH
STREET
PARISH
RevStatus
Drawing Number
Scale at A1
Eng check
Approved
Coordination
Dwg check
Drawn
Designed
Security
Client
p:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 working\01 drafting\Civil\Drawings\DA\388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0210.dwg Nov 7, 2017 - 12:06PM nel80977
App’dCh’k’dDescriptionDrawnDateRev
Project
Title
T
W
was commissioned. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility for this document to any other party other than the person by whom it was commissioned.
This document should not be relied on or used in circumstances other than those for which it was originally prepared and for which Mott MacDonald
© Mott MacDonald
Preliminary - Not for Construction
388057-MMD-DA-XX-DR-C-0210
1:400 APR P2 STD
N.McKee
C. Keenan
B. Soo
C.Keenan
D.Chapman
A. Singh
MUSIC Catchment PlanDA Civil WorksElara Boulevard - Marsden ParkElara Neighbourhood Centre
Stockland Development Pty Ltd
www.mottmac.com
+61 (0)2 9098 6800
NSW 1230, Australia
PO Box Q1678, QVB Sydney
Australia
Sydney, NSW 2000
Level 10, 383 Kent Street
JG
BS
CFK
CFKIssued for Information
Issued for Development Application
DRC
DRCP1
P2
07.11.17
18.10.17
01:400
20m 40m
Legend
Roof to Treatment = 0.846ha
Vehicular Pavement to Treatment
= 1.148ha
Landscape to Treatment = 0.527ha
Landscape Bypass = 0.006ha
Western Catchment
Area = 0.308Ha
87% IMP
Central Catchment
Area = 0.026Ha
100% IMP
Eastern Catchment
Area = 0.193Ha
50% IMP
Bypass Landscape
Area = 0.006Ha
100% IMP
Landscape Areas
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 30 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
G. HumeCeptor Brochure
HumeCeptor® systemTechnical manual
Issue 4
Contents
HumeCeptor® system 1
System operation 3
Bypass chamber 3
Treatment chamber 4
Independent verification testing 4
System options 8
Variants 8
Design information 13
Configuration of the stormwater system 13
Location in the stormwater system 13
Catchment area 13
Sizing HumeCeptor® systems 13
MUSIC/pollutant export model inputs 15
System installation 16
System maintenance 17
FAQs 17
References 18
Appendix 19
Precast solutions 32
Contact information 33
HumeCeptor® system 1
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
The HumeCeptor® system is a patented hydrodynamic separator, specifically
designed to remove hydrocarbons and suspended solids from stormwater
runoff, preventing oil spills and minimising non-point source pollution entering
downstream waterways.
HumeCeptor® system
The HumeCeptor® system is an underground, precast
concrete stormwater treatment solution that utilises
hydrodynamic and gravitational separation to
efficiently remove Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and
entrained hydrocarbons from runoff. First designed as
an ‘at source’ solution for constrained, commercial and
industrial sites it has been improved and expanded
to service large catchments, mine and quarry sites,
inundated drainage systems, and capture large
volume emergency spill events. The system is ideal for
hardstands/wash bays, car parks, shopping centres,
industrial/commercial warehouses, petrol stations,
airports, major road infrastructure applications, quarries,
mine sites and production facilities.
Independently tested, and installed in over 30,000
projects worldwide, the HumeCeptor® system provides
effective, and reliable secondary treatment of stormwater
for constrained sites.
• The system reliably removes a high level of TSS
and hydrocarbons
The HumeCeptor® system was developed specifically
to remove fine suspended solids and hydrocarbons
from stormwater, and has been certified to achieve
high pollutant removal efficiencies for TSS (>80%) and
Total Nutrients (TN) (>30%) on an annual basis.
• It captures and retains hydrocarbons and TSS down
to 10 microns
Each system is specifically designed to maintain low
treatment chamber velocities to capture and retain TSS
down to 10 microns. It also removes up to 98% of free
oils from stormwater.
• Each device is sized to achieve the necessary
Water Quality Objectives (WQO) on an annual basis
Utilising the latest build-up and wash-off algorithms,
PCSWMM software for the HumeCeptor® system
ensures that the device chosen achieves the desired
WQO (e.g. 80% TSS removal) on an annual basis.
• Its performance has been independently verified
The HumeCeptor® system’s technology has been
assessed by independent verification authorities
including the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (NJDEP), The Washington
Department of Environment (USA), and by the
Canadian Environmental Technology Verification
program (ETV).
2 HumeCeptor® system
• The system is proven
The HumeCeptor® system was one of the first
stormwater treatment devices introduced to Australia,
and now after 30,000 installations worldwide, its
popularity is testament to its performance, quality and
value for money.
• High flows won’t scour captured sediment
The unique design of HumeCeptor® units ensures that
as flows increase and exceed the treatment flow, the
velocity in the storage chamber decreases.
• Nutrients are captured along with the sediment
The effective capture of TSS results in the capture of
particulate nutrients shown to be >30% of TN and
Total Phosphorous (TP).
• Fully trafficable to suit land use up to class G
The HumeCeptor® system is a fully trafficable solution,
it can be installed under pavements and hardstands to
maximise above ground land use (loading up to class D
as standard).
• Custom designs allow for emergency oil spill storage,
directional change, multiple pipes, tidal inundation
and class G traffic loads
A range of HumeCeptor® systems are available, built
specifically to manage emergency spills (50,000 L
storage), change of pipe directions, the joining of
multiple pipes, high tail water levels as a result of
tides or downstream water bodies, and high levels of
hydrocarbons with auxiliary storage tanks.
• We are experienced in the provision of world class
treatment solutions
Humes has a team of water specialists dedicated to the
advancement of economical sustainable solutions, and
the provision of expert advice and support.
Right:The bypass chamber of a HumeCeptor® system
HumeCeptor® system 3
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
Figure 1 – HumeCeptor® system operation during design
flow conditions
Figure 2 – HumeCeptor® system operation during high
flow conditions
System operation
The HumeCeptor® stormwater treatment system
slows incoming stormwater to create a non-turbulent
treatment environment, allowing free oils and debris
to rise and sediment to settle. Each HumeCeptor®
system maintains continuous positive treatment of TSS,
regardless of flow rate, treating a wide range of particle
sizes, as well as free oils, heavy metals and nutrients that
attach to fine sediment.
The HumeCeptor® system’s patented scour prevention
technology ensures pollutants are captured and
contained during all rainfall events.
Bypass chamber
1. Stormwater flows into the inlet (weir) area of the
bypass chamber.
2. Design flows are diverted into the offline
treatment chamber by a weir, orifice and drop pipe
arrangement (refer to Figure 1).
3. The weir and orifice have been developed to create
a vortex that sucks floating oils and sediment down
into the treatment chamber.
4. During high flow conditions, stormwater in the
bypass chamber overflows the weir and is conveyed
to the stormwater outlet directly (refer to Figure 2).
5. Water which overflows the weir stabilises the head
between the inlet drop pipe and outlet decant pipe
ensuring that excessive flow is not forced into the
treatment chamber, protecting against scour or
re-suspension of settled material. The bypass is an
integral part of the HumeCeptor® unit since other
oil/grit separators have been found to scour during
high flow conditions (Schueler and Shepp, 1993).
4 HumeCeptor® system
Treatment chamber
1. Once diverted into the treatment chamber through
the weir and orifice, the drop pipe beneath the
orifice is configured to discharge water tangentially
around the treatment chamber wall.
2. Water flows through the treatment chamber to
the decant pipe which is submerged similar to the
drop pipe.
3. Hydrocarbons and other entrained substances
with a specific gravity less than water will rise
in the treatment chamber and become trapped
beneath the fibreglass insert since the decant pipe
is submerged.
4. Sediment will settle to the bottom of the chamber
by gravity forces. The large volume of the treatment
chamber assists in preventing high velocities and
promoting settling.
5. Water flows up through the decant pipe based
on the head differential at the inlet weir, and
is discharged back into the bypass chamber
downstream of the weir.
Independent verification testing
HumeCeptor® systems have been extensively researched
by more than 15 independent authorities to validate
its performance; it has now gained Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) certificates from ETV
Canada, New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection (NJDEP) and Washington Department of
Environment (WDOE).
A number of agencies have conducted independent
studies; their results from these studies (over 100 test
events) have been summarised in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – HumeCeptor® system performance summary
Pollutant Average removal efficiency Details
TSS 80% Laboratory and field results, stable, hardstand, roads,
commercial and industrial sites
TN 37% Field results
TP 53% Field results
Chromium 44% Field results
Copper 29% Field results
TPH 65% <10 ppm inflow concentration
95% 10 ppm - 50 ppm inflow concentration (typical stormwater)
99% >500 ppm inflow concentration (emergency spills)
HumeCeptor® system 5
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
TPH
con
cen
trat
ion
(pp
m)
Upstream TPH concentration
Downstream TPH concentration
80.8%79.2%
81.6%
66.2%
88.5%
50.0%
54.2%
64.3%
67.6%
64.6%
63.3%
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
Figure 3 – HumeCeptor® system field performance results for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal
Figure 4 – HumeCeptor® system field performance for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) removal
(influent concentration <10 ppm)
450
400
94.4%
98.4%
78.5%
98.7%
92.1%
89.4%
94.0%
86.7%
65.2%
67.3%
95.8%
75.0%
81.4%
70.4%
84.2%
75.2%
84.3%
97.6%
73.6%
68.8%
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Upstream TSS concentration
TSS
con
cen
trat
ion
(mg
/l)
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
Downstream TSS concentration
Percentiles Removal efficiency50% 80%75% 69%90% 65%95% 61%
6 HumeCeptor® system
Figure 5 – HumeCeptor® system field performance for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) removal
(influent concentration >10 ppm)
Figure 6 – HumeCeptor® system field performance for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) removal
(influent concentration >1,000 ppm)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
TPH
con
cen
trat
ion
(pp
m)
Upstream TPH concentration
Downstream TPH concentration
96.9%
91.6%
93.7%
91.7%
89.6%
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
98.9%
99.6%
97.9% 97.8%
1,000
500
0
TPH
con
cen
trat
ion
(pp
m)
Upstream TPH concentration
Downstream TPH concentration
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
HumeCeptor® system 7
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
15.8%
55.6%
23.4%
45.7%
18.6% 37.2%
31.3%
52.2%
37.8%
45.7%
26.3%
0.1
0
TP c
once
ntr
atio
n (m
g/l
)
Upstream TP concentration
Downstream TP concentration
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
Figure 7 – HumeCeptor® system field performance for Total Phosphorous (TP) removal
Figure 8 – HumeCeptor® system field performance for Total Nitrogen (TN) removal
Percentiles Removal efficiency50% 35%75% 26%90% 18%95% 13%
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
70.4%
41.7%
64.2%
33.3%
13.3%
37.0%
41.4% 60.5%
57.1%
95.9%
81.9%
TN c
once
ntr
atio
n (m
g/l
)
Upstream TN concentration
Downstream TN concentration
Test event
Note: Percentage values represent removal efficiencies
Percentiles Removal efficiency50% 54%75% 38%90% 24%95% 15%
Variants
Continual improvement over the last 14 years of
HumeCeptor® system installations has provided a
number of enhancements to address specific treatment
and design requirements.
• HumeCeptor® STC 2 (inlet) model
This model features a grated inlet to directly capture
runoff from hardstand areas, replacing the need for a
stormwater pit (refer to Figure 9).
Figure 9 – HumeCeptor® STC 2 (inlet) model
System options
There are a number of HumeCeptor® systems available to
meet the requirements of various WQO for maintaining
catchments and local hydrology. The standard range is
detailed in Table 2 below.
Table 2 – HumeCeptor® model range and details
HumeCeptor®
model
Pipe diameter
(mm)
Device
diameter
(mm)
Depth from
pipe invert*
(m)
Sediment
capacity
(m3)
Oil capacity
(l)
Total storage
capacity
(l)
STC 2 (inlet) 100 - 600 1,200 1.7 1 350 1,740
STC 3
100 - 1,350
1,800
1.68 2
1,020
3,410
STC 5 2.13 3 4,550
STC 7 3.03 5 6,820
STC 92,440
2.69 6 1,900 9,090
STC 14 3.69 10
2,980
13,640
STC 183,060
3.44 14 18,180
STC 23 4.04 18 22,730
STC 27 3,600 3.84 20 4,290 27,270
Note:*Depths are approximate.
8 HumeCeptor® system
Figure 11 – AquaCeptor™ model
Figure 10 – P-Series HumeCeptor® STC 2• P-Series HumeCeptor® STC 2
The P-Series STC 2 is a light duty variation of the
STC 2 model which is made from polyethylene
for non-trafficable applications, but otherwise is
dimensionally and functionally the same as the
standard STC 2 model.
The P-Series HumeCeptor® STC2 has been designed
to withstand the loads associated with a maximum
300 mm of select backfill cover (equivalent to a ground
permanent load of 6 kPa) and up to 2kPa of surcharge
load in accordance with the following standards for
strength and serviceability:
- AS/NZS 2033:2008, Installation of polyethylene pipe
systems
- AS/NZS 2566 Buried flexible pipelines.
- Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE)
Corrugated wall Stormwater collection Chambers,
F2922, American National Standard, 2013.
• AquaCeptor™ model
This model has been designed with a weir extension to
increase the level at which flows bypass the treatment
chamber, and accommodate downstream tail water
levels or periodic inundation (e.g. tidal situations).
This weir extension is provided in standard heights of
100 mm intervals, up to a maximum of 500 mm.
To maintain the hydrocarbon capture capabilities, an
additional “high level” inlet pipe is also fitted. This
facilitates the formation of the surface vortex from
the bypass chamber into the treatment chamber and
draws floating hydrocarbons into the unit.
The selection of the appropriate weir extension height
is undertaken in conjunction with the downstream
engineering design and/or tidal range charts for the
specific location. The AquaCeptor™ model is available
in the same sizes as the standard HumeCeptor® units
(refer Table 2 on the previous page).
HumeCeptor® system 9
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
• MultiCeptor™ model
The MultiCeptor™ model (refer to Figure 12) was
developed to facilitate the replacement of junction
pits while still providing the treatment abilities of the
original HumeCeptor® system and reducing time and
costs during installation. These units reverse the weir
structure to allow for:
• change of pipe direction
• multiple inlet pipes
• differing invert levels of multiple inlet pipes
• grated inlets.
The MultiCeptor™ model is available in the same sizes
as the standard HumeCeptor® units (refer to Table 3
below) and a 2,440 mm diameter MultiCeptor™ unit
is also available to accommodate drainage pipes up to
1,800 mm diameter.
The larger insert diameter allows for larger pipe
connections that are more common where pipes are
laid on very flat grades.
Figure 12 – MultiCeptor™ model
Table 3 – MultiCeptor™ model range and details
HumeCeptor®
model
Pipe diameter
(mm)
Device
diameter
(mm)
Depth from
pipe invert
(m)
Sediment
capacity
(m3)
Oil capacity
(l)
Total storage
capacity
(l)
MI3
100 - 1,350
1,800
1.68 2
1,020
3,410
MI5 2.13 3 4,550
MI7 3.03 5 6,820
MI92,440
2.69 6 1,900 9,090
MI14 3.69 10
2,980
13,640
MI183,060
3.44 14 18,180
MI23 4.04 18 22,730
MI27 3,600 3.84 20 4,290 27,270
MI9 - MI27
(2,440)100 - 1,800
2,440 top
up to
3,600 base
2.69 - 3.84 6 - 20 1,900 - 4,290 9,090 - 27,270
10 HumeCeptor® system
• DuoCeptor™ model
The DuoCeptor™ model has been developed to
treat larger catchments (2 Ha - 6 Ha) because some
constrained developments can only accommodate a
single, large device instead of several smaller devices.
The unit operates by splitting the flow and treating
half of the design flow through the first chamber. The
untreated half of the design flow bypassed from the
first chamber then passes through the split connection
pipe into the second chamber for treatment. Treated
flow from the first chamber exits and flows through
the other side of the split connection pipe, and
bypasses the second chamber to join the treated
flow from the second chamber at the outlet of the
DuoCeptor™ model.
Figure 13 displays the DuoCeptor™ model and Table 4
details the range of capacities available.
Figure 13 – DuoCeptor™ model
Table 4 – DuoCeptor™ model range and details
DuoCeptor™
model
Pipe
diameter
(mm)
Device
footprint
(L x W)
Depth from
pipe invert
(m)
Sediment
capacity
(m3)
Oil
capacity
(l)
Total storage
capacity
(l)
STC 40
600 - 1,5007,750 x 3,500
3.41 27 10,585 42,370
STC 50 4.01 35 10,585 50,525
STC 60 9,150 x 4,200 3.89 42 11,560 60,255
HumeCeptor® system 11
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
• HumeCeptor® EOS model
The HumeCeptor® EOS (Emergency Oil Spill) system
provides you with the maximum protection against
hydrocarbon spills at petrol stations, highway
interchanges and intersections. It combines
the passive, always-operating functions of the
HumeCeptor® system, with additional emergency
storage to capture the volume of spill required by your
road authority. Standard designs include 30,000 litres
and 50,000 litres of total hydrocarbon storage but
these can be modified to suit any specified volume.
Figure 14 – HumeCeptor® MAX model
• HumeCeptor® MAX model
The HumeCeptor® MAX model (refer to Figure 14)
was developed to meet the market need for a single,
large, end-of-pipe solution for TSS and hydrocarbon
removal. Utilising the HumeCeptor® system’s proven
capture and scour prevention technology, it is ideal
for very large commercial and industrial sites (>6 Ha)
(eg. quarries, mine sites and stockpile areas) that need
to achieve at least 50% TSS removal and hydrocarbon
capture. The HumeCeptor® MAX model can be
expanded to almost any capacity required.
As the HumeCeptor® MAX model uses two 2,400 mm
diameter inserts, sizing must be calculated separately
from the PCSWMM software for the HumeCeptor®
system. Contact Humes Water Solutions for assistance.
12 HumeCeptor® system
Design information
To design a system suitable for your project it is
necessary to review the configuration of the stormwater
system, the location and purpose of other stormwater
management (WSUD) controls, traffic loading, and the
catchment area and hydrology.
Configuration of the stormwater system
As a cylindrical system, HumeCeptor®
hydrodynamic separators are much more flexible for
accommodating inlet and outlet pipes on angles than
rectangular systems.
Location in the stormwater system
Specifically designed for capturing fine sediment and
hydrocarbons, the HumeCeptor® system is best suited to
“at source” applications. Therefore, it should be located
immediately downstream of the catchment area to be
treated, e.g. car parks, loading bays, refuelling stations,
wash bays.
Catchment area
As a general rule, larger catchment areas require larger
HumeCeptor® units. If the catchment area is unstable
(e.g. exposed soil) or contributes unusually high pollutant
loads (e.g. landscape supply yards), larger units are
more appropriate. This can be modelled in PCSWMM
software using the “Power Wash-off” or “Event Mean
Concentration” TSS loading function.
Sizing HumeCeptor® systems
PCSWMM software for the HumeCeptor® system is
the decision support tool used for identifying the
appropriate model. A lite version of PCSWMM software
is available to identify the HumeCeptor® system which
best meets treatment criteria for conventional urban
stormwater quality applications (commercial, industrial,
residential etc).
Conventional sites typically have stable land cover, paved
surfaces, or landscaped areas that do not easily erode
during rainfall events. Please contact Humes for further
assistance and modeling for unique or unconventional
sites. Examples of unconventional sites are as follows:
1. Sites that exhibit unstable wash-off characteristics
such as construction sites and sites with material
storage. For example, council works depots,
landscape supply yards, gravel surfaces etc.
2. Sites with specific suspended solids characteristics
such as coal manufacturing facilities, cement
manufacturers (sites with a particle size finer or
coarser than what is identified in the program).
3. Sites with altered post-development annual
hydrology. Alterations to the annual hydrology result
from the implementation of stormwater detention
upstream of the proposed HumeCeptor® system.
Infiltration or detention of small storms (< 1 year)
result in alterations to the annual hydrology. Sites
with flood control (2 to 100 year detention facilities)
will not significantly alter the annual hydrology
since detention occurs infrequently. Upstream flood
control facilities do not preclude the use of the
software for water quality design.
The software calculates continuous runoff from rainfall
and simulates sediment accumulation and sediment
transport for the design area. Annual TSS removal rates
are estimated from the particle size distribution with
settling rates calculated using Stoke’s Law, corrected
for drag. Assumptions for slope, depression storage,
evaporation rates, build-up and wash-off parameters as
well as the particle size distribution and settling rates are
given in the description of the model calculations.
Users of the software should become familiar with these
calculations and parameter values to ensure that they
understand the software application. For sites that differ
from the assumptions made in the software, please
contact your local Humes Water Solutions representative
for assistance.
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
HumeCeptor® system 13
0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Perc
ent
fin
er (%
)
Particle size (µm)
Particle size distribution according to NJDEPFineCoarseMUSIC particle size distributionRoads and Hardstand (Drapper, 2001)ARQ
Figure 15 – PCSWMM for HumeCeptor® system - PSD
In order to size a unit using the lite version of PCSWMM
software, the following six design steps should be
followed.
• Step 1 – Project details and WQOs
Enter the project details in the appropriate cells, clearly
identifying the water quality objectives (WQO) for the
development. It is recommended that a level of annual
sediment (TSS) removal be identified and defined by
a Particle Size Distribution (PSD). In most Australian
situations, this WQO is for 80% TSS removal, but a PSD
is not defined. This can be determined from relevant
research data or from site monitoring.
• Step 2 – Site details
Identify the site development by the drainage area and
the level of imperviousness. It is recommended that
imperviousness be calculated based on the actual area
of paved surfaces, sidewalks and rooftops.
• Step 3 – Upstream detention/retention
HumeCeptor® systems are designed as a water
quality device and is sometimes used in conjunction
with on site water quantity control such as ponds
or underground detention systems. Where possible,
it is more beneficial to install a HumeCeptor® unit
upstream of a detention system, as the sediment load
is reduced and the maintenance interval between
cleaning is maximised.
Where the HumeCeptor® system is installed
downstream of a detention system it will alter the
hydrology of the catchment and will influence the size
of the unit selected by the software. For those projects,
enter the footprint area and flow characteristics into
the model.
• Step 4 – Particle Size Distribution (PSD)
It is critical that the PSD is defined as part of the WQO.
The design of the treatment system relies on a Stoke’s
Law settling (and floating) process, and selection of the
target PSD influences the model outcomes.
If the objective is for long term removal of 80% of
TSS on a given site, the PSD should be representative
of the expected sediment on the site. For example, a
system designed to remove 80% of coarse particles
(>150 microns) only provides relatively poor removal
efficiency of finer particles (<75 microns) that may be
naturally present in site runoff. PCSWMM software
allows the user to enter their own PSD or select
from a range of options in the program (refer to
Figure 15 below).
14 HumeCeptor® system
• Step 5 – Rainfall records
The rainfall data provided with PCSWMM software
provides an accurate storm hydrology estimation by
modelling actual historical storm events including
duration, intensities and peaks. Local historical rainfall
has been acquired from the Bureau of Meteorology.
Select the nearest rainfall station from the list.
• Step 6 – Summary
At this point, the software is able to predict the level
of TSS removal from the site. Once the simulation has
been completed, a table is generated identifying the
TSS removal of each unit. Based on the WQO identified
in Step 1, the recommended HumeCeptor® system unit
will be highlighted.
MUSIC/pollutant export model inputs
Many local authorities utilise MUSIC or other pollutant
export models to assist in stormwater treatment train
selection, and recommend generic inputs for GPTs and
hydrodynamic separators.
Considering these against the independent research
results in Table 1 on page 4, and PCSWMM modelling
used to size a HumeCeptor® unit, the conservative
removal efficiencies in Table 5 below are recommended
on an annual basis (i.e. no bypass). Humes Water
Solutions can optimise the values to suit your
specific site.
Table 5 – MUSIC inputs for HumeCeptor® system
Pollutant Removal efficiency
TSS 80%
TN 30%
TP 30%
HumeCeptor® system 15
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
System installation
The installation of HumeCeptor® units should conform in
general to local authority’s specifications for stormwater
pit construction. Detailed installation instructions are
dispatched with each unit.
The HumeCeptor® system is installed as follows:
1. Excavate and stabilise the site.
2. Prepare the geotextile and aggregate base.
3. Install the treatment chamber base section.
4. Install the treatment chamber section/s (if required).
5. Prepare the transition slab (if required).
6. Install the bypass chamber section.
7. Fit the inlet drop pipe and decant pipe (if required).
8. Connect inlet and outlet pipes as required.
9. Backfill to transition slab level.
10. Install the maintenance access chamber section
(if required).
11. Install the frame and access cover/grate.
12. Backfill to finished surface/base course level and
complete surface pavement.
Top: Installation of the base section (step 3)
Middle: Installation of the bypass chamber(step 6)
Bottom:System ready for connection of the inlet and outlet pipes(step 8)
16 HumeCeptor® system
System maintenance
The design of the HumeCeptor® system means that
maintenance is conducted with a vacuum truck which
avoids entry into the unit.
If the HumeCeptor® unit is sized using the PCSWMM
guidelines, a maximum interval of annual maintenance
is recommended.
A typical maintenance procedure includes:
1. Open the access cover.
2. Insert the vacuum hose into the top of the treatment
chamber via the decant (outlet) pipe.
3. Remove the oily water until the level is just below
the lower edge of the decant pipe.
4. Lower a sluice gate into the nearest upstream
junction pit and decant the water from the
treatment chamber into the upstream pit until the
sediment layer is exposed.
5. Remove the sediment layer into the vacuum truck
for disposal.
6. Raise the upstream sluice gate and allow water to
return into the HumeCeptor® unit.
7. Replace the access cover.
FAQs
• Will it capture litter?
The HumeCeptor® system is primarily designed for
hydrocarbon and fine sediment removal, so if litter
is expected from the catchment an upstream GPT
is recommended. However, items such as cigarette
butts, plastic bags and smaller gross pollutants will be
captured by the system.
• Do I need to model a bypass flow for the HumeCeptor®
system in MUSIC?
No, PCSWMM software for the HumeCeptor® system
analyses all flows from the catchment to determine
80% TSS removal on an annual basis. Therefore, the
output efficiency of PCSWMM for the selected model
can be incorporated into a MUSIC treatment node
without a bypass flow.
• How often do I need to undertake maintenance?
A maximum interval of 12 months is recommended,
with 3 months ideal, however, these systems are
designed with a factor of safety, so it will continue to
retain sediment until it is completely full.
• What if the PSD from my site is different to those in
the software?
Humes Water Solutions has the ability to model
a user-defined PSD in PCSWMM software for the
HumeCeptor® system. If you have PSD results contact
us for assistance.
• Do I have to use the model that PCSWMM
software highlights?
No, in most stormwater treatment trains, there are
other measures upstream and/or downstream. Select
the unit size that you need to achieve your desired
removal efficiency in the context of your overall
concept. Remember that selecting a model that
removes less TSS will also remove less TN and TP.
• Is it possible to change the hydrology model defaults
in PCSWMM?
Yes, Humes Water Solutions has the ability to vary
these inputs. Please contact us for further assistance.
• Will the HumeCeptor® system’s treatment chamber
release nutrients?
Over time, captured organic material will break down
and release nutrients in all treatment measures
whether natural or manufactured. As part of a
treatment train, downstream natural measures can
remove the small portion of nutrients released during
dry weather flows. A regular maintenance program will
reduce the amount of break down occurring (Ball and
Powell, 2006).
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
HumeCeptor® system 17
References
• Novotny, V and Chesters, G (1981) “Handbook of
Non-Point Pollution Sources and Management”,
John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• Charbeneau ,RJ and Barrett, M.E (1998) “Evaluation of
Methods for Estimating Stormwater Pollutant Loads”,
Water environment research 70 (7): 1,295 - 1,302.
• Ball, J and Abustan, I (1995) “An Investigation of the
Particle Size Distribution During Storm Events on an
Urban Catchment”, Prol. the 2nd Int. Symposium on
Urban Stormwater Management 1995 pp 531 - 535,
IEAUST, Melbourne, Nat. Conf. Pub. 95/3.
• Sartor, J.D and Boyd, G.B (1972) “Water Pollutant
Aspects of Street Surface Contaminants”, US EPA
(EPA - R2 - 72 - 081) Washington, DC.
• Ball, J and Powell, M (2006) “Influence of Anaerobic
Breakdown on the Selection of Appropriate
Urban Stormwater Management Measures”,
SIA Annual Conference.
• Schueler, Tom and David Shepp (1993) “The Quality
of Trapped Sediments and Pool Water Within Oil Grit
Separators in Suburban Maryland”, Metropolitan
Council of Governments.
• Why is the HumeCeptor® system not sized on
flow rate?
The HumeCeptor® system is sized using actual
historical rainfall and an algorithm based on research
(Novotny and Chesters 1981, Charbeneau and Barrett,
1988, Ball and Abustan 1995, Sartor and Boyd 1972)
showing that pollutants build up and wash off a
catchment which is influenced by time, Particle Size
Distribution (PSD), rainfall volume and intensity. These
form a pollutograph that the software uses to calculate
the HumeCeptor® system performance for all flows
in every event over the rainfall period. The software
then recommends the model that will remove a user
selected removal target (usually set to 80%) of TSS load
from all of these events.
• How is the HumeCeptor® system different to a GPT?
The HumeCeptor® system is specifically designed to
target fine sediment and hydrocarbons. Therefore, it is
designed to maintain velocities through the treatment
chamber <0.02 m/s. A GPT is designed to capture
gross pollutants (>1 mm). For a GPT to function in
an equivalent way to a HumeCeptor® system, the
treatment chamber velocity must be <0.02 m/s.
• Why would I use a HumeCeptor® system upstream of
a biofilter?
Using a HumeCeptor® system upstream of a biofilter
acts as a non- scouring sediment forebay, containing
sediment to a confined location for easy removal. This
protects the biofilter and lengthens its lifespan.
18 HumeCeptor® system
HumeCeptor® system 19
Hu
meC
epto
r® s
yste
m
Appendix
HumeCeptor® system technical drawings
32 HumeCeptor® system
Precast solutions
Stormwater
Stormwater treatment
Primary treatment
HumeGard® Gross Pollutant Trap
Secondary treatment
HumeCeptor® hydrodynamic separator
Tertiary treatment
JellyFish® filter
Detention and infiltration
StormTrap® system
Soakwells
Harvesting and reuse
RainVault® system
ReserVault® system
RainVault® Mini system
Precast concrete cubes
Segmental shafts
Stormwater drainage
Steel reinforced concrete pipes – trench
Steel reinforced concrete pipes – salt water cover
Steel reinforced concrete pipes – jacking
Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP)
Box culverts
Uniculvert® modules
Headwalls
Stormwater pits
Access chambers/Manholes
Kerb inlet systems
Floodgates
Geosynthetics
Sewage transfer and storage
Bridge and platform
Tunnel and shaft
Walling
Potable water supply
Irrigation and rural
Traffic management
Cable and power management
Rail
Top: StormTrap® system
Middle:RainVault® system
Bottom:Segmental shaft
National sales 1300 361 601
humes.com.au
info@humes.com.au
A Division of Holcim Australia
This publication supersedes all previous literature on this subject. As the specifications and details contained in this publication may change please check with Humes Customer Service for confirmation of current issue. This publication provided general information only and is no substitute for professional engineering advice. No representations or warranty is made regarding the accuracy, completeness or relevance of the information provided. Users must make their own determination as to the suitability of this information for their specific circumstances. Humes accepts no liability for any loss or damage resulting from any reliance on the information provided in this publication. Humes is a registered business name and registered trademark of Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd (Holcim). HumeCeptor is a registered trademark of Holcim. “Strength. Performance. Passion.” is a trademark of Holcim. HumeCeptor is marketed, sold and manufactured by Humes under licence from Imbrium Systems Corp.
© March 2015 Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 87 099 732 297. All rights reserved. This guide or any part of it may not be reproduced without prior written consent of Holcim.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 31 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
H. SPELFilter Brochure
www.spel.com.au
SPELFilterCartridge Filter For Tertiary Stormwater Treatment
Features» Achieves 80% TSS Removal
» Achieves 60% TP Removal
» Achieves 45% TN Removal
» Achieves 100% Gross Pollutant Removal
» Achieves 60% reduction in Copper concentrations
» Achieves 40% reduction in Zinc concentrations
SPEL Applications Engineers are ready to design a custom SPELFilter system to meet the demands of your site.
SPELFilter provides the performance of a biofiltration system without the surface footprint disadvantage of vegetated assets. SPELFilter maximises your land use on constrained sites.
Where intuitive technology meets value.
How it worksThe SPELFilter has an upflow treatment process, through a spiral wrapped media configuration that maximises surface area. The benefit is excellent pollutant removal in a small footprint.
Hydraulic pressure forces water through the filter media, discharges through the centre tube and out through the outlet collection manifold.
Upon completion of a treatment cycle, each cartridge backwashes and effectively dislodges particulates from the filtration layers. This reestablishes filter porosity. The dislodged particles accumulate on the vault floor for easy removal during maintenance.
SPELFilter’s patented design has no moving parts and generates a true siphon effect.
A SPEL Stormceptor Class 1 upstream of the SPELFilter in the treatment train greatly increases the life cycle interval of the SPELFilter as the SPEL Stormceptor Class1 removes the larger gross pollutants, coarse sediments, total suspended solids and hydrocarbons, enabling the SPELFilter to target fine particulate matter and nutrients.
2
3
Spiral DesignSpiral Cross-Section
Filter ConfigurationsValue & BenefitsProven Sand Filter Performance: The uniform size silica-sand filter media provides for higher removal efficiencies than coarser types of media. SPELFilter media is inorganic – it doesn’t leach nitrogen and other nutrients.
Greater flexibility: Due to the significant surface area, designated flow path and high flow capacity, combined with the modular cartridge design, the SPELFilter system can be deployed in a variety of structures including manholes, precast vaults, or cast-in-place structures.
Each system is optimised to suit your specific site and local authority requirements by qualified and experienced professionals.
0033
.5 S
PE
LFilt
er 2
.1
www.spel.com.auSPEL Environmental accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting from any person acting on this information. The details and dimensions contained in this document may change, please check with SPEL Environmental for confirmation of current specifications.
HEAD OFFICEPO Box 6144 Silverwater NSW 1811
100 Silverwater Rd Silverwater NSW 2128
Phone: +61 2 8705 0255 Fax: +61 2 8014 8699
DESIGN OFFICESNew South Wales 61 2 8705 0255 Canberra 61 2 6128 1000 Queensland 61 7 3271 6960 Victoria & Tasmania 61 3 5274 1336 South Australia 61 8 8275 8000 West Australia 61 8 9350 1000 Northern Territory 61 2 8705 0255 New Zealand 64 9 276 9045
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 32 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
I. SPEL StormSack Brochure
www.spel.com.au
SPEL StormsackAt-source Gross Pollutant Trap
2
An all too common issue with today’s highly impervious landscape is how to meet stormwater regulations with limited budgets and tight space constraints.
SPEL StormSack filtration solutions are highly engineered water quality devices that are deployed directly in the stormwater system to capture contaminants close the surface for ease of maintenance. Easily retrofitted into new or existing structures, SPEL StormSack filtration technology is a decentralized approach to stormwater treatment that essentially repurposes traditional site infrastructure and customizes it to meet specific site water quality goals. In this way, it satisfies important objectives of today’s LID (Low Impact Development) criteria.
From an operations perspective, catch basins with SPEL Stormsack filters are also easier and quicker to clean out because pollutants are trapped just under the grate.
StormSackThe SPEL StormSack is specifically designed for the capture of gross pollutants: sediment, litter, and oil and grease. Ideally suited for municipal storm drain retrofits, the SPEL StormSack’s unique design allows maintenance to be performed using conventional vacuum suction equipment.
Stormwater Treatment
Application Regulatory Issue Target Pollutants
Council Storm Drain Retrofits At-source litter capture Sediment, Litter, O&G
Commercial/Retail/Residential Stormwater Compliance Sediment, Litter, O&G
Litter Prone Urban Areas Cost effective litter control Litter ≥ 5 mm
Scrap Metal/Solid Waste/Oil Storage/Etc Industrial Multi-Sector General Permit Gross Pollutants, O&G
Part of Treatment Train Council Stormwater Quality Improvement Targets Sediment, Litter, O&G
Construction Sediment/Erosion Sediment Control Plan Sediment/Erosion Control
Features
1. Durable, aluminum frame construction
2.Integral oil boom effectively captures oil and grease from spills
3.Patented dovetailed flange – allows 12cm of length/width field adjustment
4.Polypropylene netting protects sack from suction hose during maintenance
5.Steel clip with locking tab holds replaceable filter sack in place
6. Baffled bypass traps floatables
Standard SPEL Stormsack to suit Pit Sizes
450x450mm
600x600mm
900x600mm
900x900mm
[ 4 ]
[ 2 ]
[ 3 ]
[ 1] [ 5 ][ 6 ]
Custom sizes (i.e. 1200x900mm) can be manufactured on short lead times
3
Specifications & DetailsGeneral Description
This technology is a post developed stormwater treatment system. The SPEL StormSack provides effective filtration of solid pollutants and debris typical of urban runoff, while utilising the existing or new storm drain infrastructure. The StormSack is designed to rest on the flanges of conventional catch basin frames and is engineered for most hydraulic and cold climate conditions.
Installation And Maintenance
Installation procedures shall include removing the storm grate, cleaning the ledge of debris and solids, measuring catch basin clear opening and adjusting flanges to rest on grate support ledge. Install SPEL StormSack with splash guard under curb opening so the adjustable flanges are resting on the grate support ledge. Install corner filler pieces. Reinstall storm grate directly on support flanges [rise shall be no more than 1/8 inch (3 mm)].Maintenance: Typically the SPEL StormSack is serviceable from the street level, and therefore maintenance does not require confined space entry into the catch basin structure. The unit is designed to be maintained in place with a vacuum hose attached to a sweeper or a vactor truck. The oil boom is also designed to easily be replaced from the street level. Use only SPEL replaceable parts.
Products
Material and Design A. Adjustable Flange and Deflector: Aluminum Alloy
6063-T6 B. Splash Guard: neoprene rubber C. Stormsack: woven polypropylene geotextile with US
Mesh 20 D. Corner Filler: Aluminum Allow 5052-H32 E. Lifting Tabs: Aluminum Allow 5052-H32 F. Replaceable Oil Boom: polypropylene 3 inch
(76 mm) diameter G. Mesh Liner: HDPE, diamond configuration H. Support Hardware: CRES 300 Series Typical Performance Characteristics A. Debris capacity: 8.5cu. ft. (0.24 m3) B. Filtered flow rate: 7.3 cfs (207 lps) C. Primary baffled bypass flow rate: 4.2cfs (119 lps) D. Secondary bypass flow rate: 0.4 cfs (10 lps) E. Total bypass flow rate: 4.6 cfs (130 lps) F. Oil boom sorption capacity: 376 oz (11 L) Recommended minimum clearance from bottom of SPEL StormSack to inside bottom of vault is 2 inches (50 mm) Typical frame adjustability range of 5 inches (127 mm) in each direction.
Benefits
Field PerformanceThe SPEL Stormsack was introduced to the Australian market in 2012 and field testing is underway at several locations in South-east Queensland. Laboratory testing has shown capture of 99.99% of gross pollutants up to the bypass flow rate.* Further results will be provided as they become available.
www.spel.com.auSPEL Environmental accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting from any person acting on this information. The details and dimensions contained in this document may change, please check with SPEL Environmental for confirmation of current specifications.
HEAD OFFICEPO Box 6144 Silverwater NSW 1811
100 Silverwater Rd Silverwater NSW 2128
Phone: +61 2 8705 0255 Fax: +61 2 8014 8699
DESIGN OFFICESNew South Wales 61 2 8705 0255 Canberra 61 2 6128 1000 Queensland 61 7 3271 6960 Victoria & Tasmania 61 3 5274 1336 South Australia 61 8 8275 8000 West Australia 61 8 9350 1000 Northern Territory 61 2 8705 0255 New Zealand 64 9 276 9045
0033
SP
EL S
torm
Sac
k 2.
0
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 33 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
J. MUSIC Link Results
Project Details
Project: Elara
Report Export Date: 8/12/2017
Catchment Name: 388057 2017-12-08 MUSIC Rev C-JE
Catchment Area: 2.527ha
Impervious Area*: 94.60%
Rainfall Station: 67035 LIVERPOOL(WHITLAM
Modelling Time-step: 6 Minutes
Modelling Period: 1/01/1967 - 31/12/1976 11:54:00 PM
Mean Annual Rainfall: 857mm
Evapotranspiration: 1261mm
MUSIC Version: 6.2.1
MUSIC-link data Version: 6.22
Study Area: Blacktown
Scenario: Blacktown Development
Company Details
Company: Mott MacDonald
Contact: Jocelyn Ellero
Address: Level 10, 383 Kent Street, Sydney, 2000
Phone: 83190909
Email: jocelyn.ellero@mottmac.com
Treatment Train Effectiveness
Node: Receiving Reduction
Flow 4.74%
TSS 92.7%
TP 62.4%
TN 56.5%
GP 99.7%
Treatment Nodes
Node Type Number
Rain Water Tank Node 4
Detention Basin Node 3
GPT Node 4
Generic Node 3
Source Nodes
Node Type Number
Urban Source Node 16
MUSIC-link Report
* takes into account area from all source nodes that link to the chosen reporting node, excluding Import Data Nodes
Comments
All parameters meet target except for total phosphorus which is just under Council target and was previously dicussed with Council.
NOTE: A successful self-validation check of your model does not constitute an approved model by Blacktown City CouncilMUSIC-link now in MUSIC by eWater – leading software for modelling stormwater solutions
1 of 4
Passing Parameters
Node Type Node Name Parameter Min Max Actual
Detention SPEL vault (17.4/0.85) % Reuse Demand Met None None 0
Detention SPEL vault (30.2/0.53) % Reuse Demand Met None None 0
Detention SPEL vault (4.5/0.85) % Reuse Demand Met None None 0
GPT Humeceptor 1 Hi-flow bypass rate (cum/sec) None None 100
GPT Humeceptor 2 Hi-flow bypass rate (cum/sec) None None 100
GPT Humeceptor 3 Hi-flow bypass rate (cum/sec) None None 100
GPT SPEL StormSack Blacktown Node 2015-05-14 Hi-flow bypass rate (cum/sec) None None 0.011
Rain Rainwater Tank L1 % Reuse Demand Met 80 None 83.1733
Receiving Receiving % Load Reduction None None 4.74
Receiving Receiving GP % Load Reduction 90 None 99.7
Receiving Receiving TN % Load Reduction 45 None 56.5
Receiving Receiving TSS % Load Reduction 85 None 92.7
Urban Bypass Landscape (0.006ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.006
Urban Bypass Landscape (0.006ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Bypass Landscape (0.006ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.006
Urban Catchment T1 (0.011ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.011
Urban Catchment T1 (0.011ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Catchment T1 (0.011ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.011
Urban Catchment T1 Landscape (0.011ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.011
Urban Catchment T1 Landscape (0.011ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Catchment T1 Landscape (0.011ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.011
Urban Central Landscape (0.015ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.015
Urban Central Landscape (0.015ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Central Landscape (0.015ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.015
Urban Childcare Centre (0.098ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.098
Urban Childcare Centre (0.098ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Childcare Centre (0.098ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.098
Urban Eastern Carpark (0.833ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.833
Urban Eastern Carpark (0.833ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Eastern Carpark (0.833ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.833
Urban Eastern Landscape (0.159ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.095
Urban Eastern Landscape (0.159ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0.063
Urban Eastern Landscape (0.159ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.159
Urban Landscaped Swale East (0.014ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Landscaped Swale East (0.014ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0.014
Urban Landscaped Swale East (0.014ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.014
Urban Landscaped Swale West (0.020ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Landscaped Swale West (0.020ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0.02
Urban Landscaped Swale West (0.020ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.02
Urban Loading Dock (0.146ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.146
Only certain parameters are reported when they pass validation
NOTE: A successful self-validation check of your model does not constitute an approved model by Blacktown City CouncilMUSIC-link now in MUSIC by eWater – leading software for modelling stormwater solutions
2 of 4
Node Type Node Name Parameter Min Max Actual
Urban Loading Dock (0.146ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Loading Dock (0.146ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.146
Urban Medical Centre (0.175ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.175
Urban Medical Centre (0.175ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Medical Centre (0.175ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.175
Urban Retail Pod 1 (0.125ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.125
Urban Retail Pod 1 (0.125ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Retail Pod 1 (0.125ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.125
Urban Retail Pod 2 (0.067ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.067
Urban Retail Pod 2 (0.067ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Retail Pod 2 (0.067ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.067
Urban Supermarket Roof (0.381ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.381
Urban Supermarket Roof (0.381ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Supermarket Roof (0.381ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.381
Urban Western Carpark (0.158ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.158
Urban Western Carpark (0.158ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0
Urban Western Carpark (0.158ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.158
Urban Western Landscape (0.308ha) Area Impervious (ha) None None 0.268
Urban Western Landscape (0.308ha) Area Pervious (ha) None None 0.039
Urban Western Landscape (0.308ha) Total Area (ha) None None 0.308
Only certain parameters are reported when they pass validation
NOTE: A successful self-validation check of your model does not constitute an approved model by Blacktown City CouncilMUSIC-link now in MUSIC by eWater – leading software for modelling stormwater solutions
3 of 4
Failing Parameters
Node Type Node Name Parameter Min Max Actual
Rain Rainwater Tank B9 % Reuse Demand Met 80 None 75.09
Rain Rainwater Tank J2 % Reuse Demand Met 80 None 79.56
Rain Rainwater Tank S1 % Reuse Demand Met 80 None 78.1127
Receiving Receiving TP % Load Reduction 65 None 62.4
Only certain parameters are reported when they pass validation
NOTE: A successful self-validation check of your model does not constitute an approved model by Blacktown City CouncilMUSIC-link now in MUSIC by eWater – leading software for modelling stormwater solutions
4 of 4
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 34 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
K. Landscaping Rainwater Reuse Plan
Pervious landscapearea = 494m2
Pervious landscapearea = 375m2
Pervious landscapearea = 245m2
Pervious landscapearea = 165m2
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 35 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
L. Council Correspondence
1
Keenan, Colm
From: Keenan, Colm
Sent: 26 September 2017 16:14
To: 'Prakash.Khadka@blacktown.nsw.gov.au'
Cc: McKee, Neil; 'tony.merrilees@blacktown.nsw.gov.au'
Subject: [388057] Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Temporary OSD
Attachments: PAM Minutes - Elara Local Centre .pdf
Hi Prakash,
Thanks for calling me back this afternoon.
To confirm our conversation today, the Pre-DA Minutes attached request temporary OSD to be provided for the
proposed Elara neighbourhood development (Drainage 2. On Site Detention).
As discussed, the regional OSD as per Cardno drawings CardnoUT-CV-ST01 has been constructed and is operational,
therefore temporary OSD is not required for the proposed Elara Neighbourhood development.
Thanks again,
Colm
Colm Keenan
Civil Engineer
T +61 (0)2 9098 6800 D +61 (0)2 9098 6747
F +61 (0)2 9098 6810
Colm.Keenan@mottmac.com
Mott MacDonald
383 Kent Street
Sydney NSW 2000
PO Box Q1678, QVB Sydney, NSW 1230
Australia
Website | Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Mott MacDonald Australia Pty Limited is a subsidiary of Mott MacDonald International Limited. Registered in Australia, ABN 13 134 120 353
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Mott MacDonald | Elara Neighbourhood Centre 36 Stormwater Management Plan
388057 | SW01 | D | 8 December 2017 P:\Sydney\Projects\38xxxx\388057\04 Working\02 Documents\Civil\2017-09-04 Stormwater Management Plan\Working Report\388057 2017-11-07 Elara Neighbourhood Centre - Stormwater Management Report RevD.docx
mottmac.com
top related