electronic resource management systems: alternative solutions

World Library and Information Congress73rd IFLA General Conference and Council

Cape Town Pre-Conference, August 16-17, 2007

Electronic Resource Management Systems: Alternative Solutions

Dalene HawthorneEmporia State University dhawthor@emporia.edu

Jennifer WatsonUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center

jenniferwatson@tennessee.edu

Introduction• Electronic Resource Management Systems

(ERMS) now exist, but many libraries do not yet own them

• Our premise about why: – ERMS are prohibitively expensive for many

libraries to purchase and implement

• We wanted to know: – Does the size of the collection factor in the

decision-making process?– Are there other reasons libraries have not yet

purchased an ERMS?– What are libraries doing when they can’t justify the

purchase of a full-blown ERMS?– Are there alternative solutions we can share?

Brief Literature Review• Focused the review on the period after

commercial ERM Systems became available

• Most of the literature on ERMS since 2004 is about implementation of commercial ERM Systems

• Some limitations of commercial systems emerged from these articles:– the lack of a solution for organizations with

multiple integrated library systems, such as consortia

– the lack of integration with acquisitions data– commercial systems don’t address local needs

ERMS Survey• Emporia State University and University of

Tennessee Health Science Center representatives presented their alternative solutions at the North American Serials Interest Group meeting

• Realized from the discussion there was a lot of interest in alternatives to full-blown ERM Systems

ERMS Survey

• Decided to conduct a survey to try to learn more about ERM Systems in libraries

• Developed the survey and announced it on e-mail lists in the U.S. and Europe

• Left the survey open for a little over a week

Survey Results

• 196 respondents completed the survey

• Where are they located?– 73.2% United States– 17.1% Europe– 3.2% Canada– 2.8% Australasia– 1.9% Asia– 1.4% Africa– 0.5% South America

Survey Results

• What types of libraries do they represent?– 81.8% Academic– 15.0% Special/Other– 2.8% Public– 0.5% School

How many libraries own a commercial ERMS?

• 50% of responding libraries own commercial ERMS

• Not sure everyone understood the question in the same way

Is price a limiting factor?

• 104 respondents do not own ERMS– 47% indicated cost as a very relevant

factor– Cost was the most relevant factor for

libraries that do not own a commercial ERMS

Does the number of e-resources matter?

• Survey Question: Approximately how many electronic resource licenses does your library manage/renew annually?If you buy a bundle of 12 e-journals or a database, count that as 1 license. Count an individual subscription to an e-journal as 1 license. Please estimate the total even if licenses are handled outside of your library.

Number of resources as a factor in owning an ERMS

• Approximately 40% of libraries with fewer than 100 e-resources own a commercial ERMS

• Approximately 57% of libraries with more than 100 e-resources own a commercial ERMS

Number of resources as a factor in owning an ERMS

• However, 49% of libraries that manage more than 500 e-resources own a commercial ERMS

Other factors?• 28% cited concerns about

interoperability

• 27% cited concerns about functionality

• 25% indicated limited staff and funding to manage an ERMS

• 18% said already have home grown system

Other factors?

• 15% cited limited resources to research which system to buy

• 15% indicated reliance on consortia

• 12% said current workflow was OK

• 11% said they had too few e-resources to justify the expense

• 10% cited unsupportive management

•Homegrown databases

•Vendor tools

•New uses for existing tools

•Content management systems

Alternatives in Practice

•No annual subscription fee

•Ability to instantly update and alter database

•Customize database to needs of library

•Ensure database will integrate into website

•Staff must keep up with e-journal changes

•Technical expertise to maintain database

Homegrown databases

FileMaker

MySQL

•Help handles aspects of e-resources management

•Inspire developers of home-grown tools

Vendor Tools

EBSCOhost EJS

WorldCat Lists

•Library catalog

•Blackboard

•Blog

•Microsoft Excel

•Microsoft Outlook

•Paper calendar

New Uses for Existing Tools

Innovative Catalog

Blackboard

Blog

Microsoft Excel

Microsoft Outlook

Shared Folder

Calendar

Content Management System

• Provides multiple points of access to databases on the library’s website

• Staff have an easy-to-use interface to add and edit databases

Conclusion• Electronic resource management

challenges our organizational skills and tools

• As with any system selection, it is critical to analyze the needs of the institution and select an appropriate solution

• System can be as simple as a paper calendar or as complex as a commercial ERMS

Discussion?

• Are there interesting ideas we haven’t covered?

• Did anyone identify an option that might be useful?

Thank You!Dalene Hawthorne, Emporia State University, dhawthor@emporia.edu

Jennifer Watson, University of Tennessee Health Science Center,

jenniferwatson@tennessee.edu

We thank Kimberly Parker for graciously agreeing to present for

us!