employment land workshop
Post on 25-Jan-2016
43 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Employment Land Workshop
Presentation to East Midlands Councils
23 June 2011
John Robertson Colin Robinson
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Aims of Today’s Workshop
• Introduction
• Changing context for ELRs
• Methodology of Audit
• Key Findings
• Local Authority Views on ELRs
• Audit Recommendations
• Challenges for Future ELRs
• Role in a Changing Planning System
• The Way Forward
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Purpose of the Audit
EMDA commissioned Audit of ELRs in region in 2010 that would:
• examine consistency of different ELRs
• highlight areas needing update + provide practical advice on doing this
• identify + publicise examples of good practice
• identify any further work required for ELRs to be robust at EiPs
Aim was not to find deficiencies in ELRs that reflected conditions when they were carried out
Key questions:
• do ELRs take account of changing economic conditions?
• do ELRs reflect more recent Government guidance?
• are ELRs consistent with the sub-regional picture?
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
What has changed for ELRs?
• PPS4 introduced range of new requirements:
- need to assess land requirements of wider range of economic development
- more emphasis on deliverability of sites
- flexible supply to support clusters & emerging sectors
- sequential assessment for new office sites
- reconsider allocations for single use/restricted uses
- combine employment & housing land need studies
- consider needs of rural economy
• but 2004 ODPM Guidance not updated + status unclear
• the recession happened + changed growth forecasts
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Study Approach
Stage 1Assessment
Criteria
Stage 2Survey of LPAs
Stage 3Review ELRs
Outputs form evidence base for
LDF
Devised a range of evaluative criteria,
sent out questionnaires and face-face
meetings
How well did the ELR
comply with the relevant guidance at the time?
Does it meet the PPS4
requirements and are its
assumptions resilient to the
recession?
How well does the ELR take
account of and reflect
strategic factors?
Ke
y Q
ue
stio
ns
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Methodology of ELR Audit
ELRs assessed against range of criteria in 3 main categories:
• Compliance with 2004 ODPM Guidance
• How well reflect PPS4 / Post Recession Factors
• Strategic Coherence / Fit
Key elements of ELRs given ‘health check’ rating within 6 levels
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Consistency of ELRs
36 of the 41 Districts had ELRs
Broadly similar methodologies used, based on 2004 ODPM Guidance
• quite high variation in ages of ELRs
• no district solely reliant on ELR earlier than March 2008
• all ELRs pre-dated PPS4
• some covered one district/others group of districts
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Consistency of Approach
• Time Horizons - most cover up to 2026 but 10 only to 2016
• Demand forecasts - most used pre-recession job forecasts with inconsistent time frames;10 with base date of 2004/earlier
• Job densities/plot ratios - ELRs broadly consistent
• Land or Floorspace requirement - most ELRs indicated ‘land’ need but no common approach
• All ELRs included commercial market inputs at some level but not always clear how and with whom
• 10 ELRs did not identify potential new sites or areas of search
• Gross or net land requirement – half of ELRs indicated gross requirements but others net/unclear
• Flexibility factor - additional safety margin or allowance but considerable variation in approach/amount – can exaggerate differences between districts
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Consistency of ELRs – Overall Picture
• Many ELRs prepared pre-recession
• Significant areas of consistency - all used commercial market inputs and similar job/land conversion ratios
• But also substantial variations in approach:
- demand forecasting approaches
- base dates of forecasts
- time horizons
- amount of safety margin
- gross/net space requirements
ELRs do not provide a consistent picture of region’s future requirements without update
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
ELR Compliance with PPS4/ Recession
Limited compliance with PPS4 requirements which post-dated most ELRs
• economic vision for area
• assess local economic strengths/weaknesses
• include low economic growth/recession scenario
• assess needs of Non B uses
• assess deliverability of sites
• flexible supply to support clusters & emerging sectors • sequential assessment for new office sites • reconsider allocations for single use/restricted use
• combined employment /housing land studies
• identify 5 year land supply
• needs of rural economy
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
ELR Compliance with Guidance, PPS4 & Strategic Fit
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Compliant with 2004 CLGGuidance
Additional PPS4/PostRecession Factors
Strategic Coherence / Fit
% D
istr
icts
Com
plia
nt
3: Covered, but only to a limited degree
4: Covered in some detail/some modest omissions
5: Up to date and addressed in full
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
ELR Performance by District
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Views on ELRs by LPAs/Users
Questionnaire survey & interviews of LPAs
Aimed to obtain user feedback on effectiveness of ELRs & how to improve
Key findings:
• Some ELRs overly mechanistic and constrained by the guidance
• Result that many completed ELRs, whilst sound, would have limited value to LPA
• Widening scope of ELRs resulting from PPS4 - further guidance on what to include/exclude required
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Key Issues Emerging from the Audit
• No ELR in region tested at appeal has been found deficient
• Majority of LPA officers appear happy with their ELRs
• ‘Building blocks’ appear to be relatively consistent across the region
BUT:
• Almost all ELRs deficient to some degree re: PPS4 compliance
• Impacts of recession have not been taken into account
• Many ELRs provide insufficient advice re: preferred locations for new sites
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Identified Areas to Update/Strengthen
• Any LPA without ELR coverage should undertake one
• Scope for region-wide methodology for consistency
• Should cover wider range of ‘employment’ uses
• Update demand forecasts to reflect recession/slower growth
• All ELRs should provide district level breakdowns
• Ensure forecasts match Core Strategy timeframe
• Clarify difference between gross and net
• Integrate housing /economic studies (e.g. SHLAA)
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Way Forward
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Challenges for Future ELRs
• Changing national policy background - without PPS4 or ELR guidance + greater flexibility/less prescription?
• Localism + different evidence base for new Local Plans
• Relating to Business Neighbourhood Plans
• Impact of EZs + proposals to convert vacant employment space to residential
• Major changes in economic outlook & job growth
• Changing prospects for some economic sectors
• Changing employment densities - 40% less office space per job, but higher industrial space needs
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Role of ELRs in Changing Planning System
The proper planning of employment land needs is likely to remain a key element of the future planning system and has a key role to play in delivering economic growth:
• Plan for Growth /draft NPPF indicate ongoing role for some form of ELR and stress importance of economic development
• LPAs should take account of ….the need to maintain a flexible and responsive supply of land for key sectors…(Ministerial Statement, 23 March)
• New presumption in favour of sustainable development
• LPAs should ‘prepare local plans on the basis that objectively assessed development needs should be met, and with sufficient flexibility to respond to rapid shifts in demand or other economic changes’.
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Why ELRs are still important?
• Important role in post PPS4 appeals involving employment land
• Range of uses proposed - housing, retail, healthcare, leisure, mixed
• Only 4 out of 21 allowed including only 1 residential scheme
• 13 dismissed despite creating jobs in PPS4 terms
• Key factor was need to retain good site backed by recent ELR
• Weight given to the PPS4 aim to maintain range of sites for broad range of economic development
• Marketing evidence indicating no demand given limited weight during depressed market
Lessons
• PPS4 not obviously overriding/undermining ELRs
• Robust, up-to-date ELR vital to protecting employment sites
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Consequences of not having a Robust ELR
• Core Strategy can be found unsound• Windsor & Maidenhead• Medway
• Lost appeals + costs• Sunderland
• Difficulty in defending B class land from other uses• Wear Valley, Hart + many others
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
What Next?
• If you don’t have an adequate ELR within evidence base, get one
• Consider whether current ELR needs to be updated
• Ensure update covers key requirements for “future proofing”
• Build in tests of robustness
• Relate to housing needs assessment if possible
• Ensure deliverability of allocated sites is assessed
• In times of financial constraints, explore cost effective / targeted options for partial update rather than full review
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
Lower Cost Approaches to Updating ELRs
Focus on discrete elements rather than comprehensive review?
- only what is needed by the district (or sub-regional group)
- update demand forecasts, fill specific gaps, address key issues
- identify land needs of Non B Uses
- assess implications of use class changes
- aligning job growth/land needs with planned housing development
- delivery of major employment sites through new funding /policy mechanisms (e.g. TIF, EZ, LDO, Neighbourhood Plans)
- a Workspace Strategy including delivery, rather than an ELR?
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
NLP Assessment Framework for Local Employment Space
Insert presentation title here on master pageEmployment Land Workshop
top related