enhancing gas chromatography performance - energy
Post on 15-Oct-2021
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
W. T. Shmayda, N. P. Redden, R. F. EarleyUniversity of RochesterLaboratory for Laser Energetics
Enhancing Gas Chromatography Performance
1
Tritium Focus Group-SandiaAlbuquerque, NM
22–25 October 2018
E28000
2
• Thermal conductivity and tritium monitor detector measurements are complementary and predict similar atom fractions in H/D/T mixtures within 1%
• Miniaturization of the pressure sensing detector and the effluent isolation valve will reduce DT injection quantities for assay by 60%
• LLE has analyzed two of the three inactive gas samples provided by Sandia National Laboratories as part of the round robin exercise to compare assay results across the complex
Outline/Summary
Filling cryogenic targets in the permeation cell is a multistep process
G6218r
5
DT High-Pressure System (DTHPS) Glovebox
Tertiary containment
Syringe pump
Cryostat
FTS Glovebox
To tritium removal system
TFS Glovebox
USB 2 Assay
USB 1
DTHPScondensation
tube
High-pressure
guage Permeation cell
Condensationtube
P/Ddiffuser
TFS: Tritium Fill StationUSB: uranium storage bedFTS: Fill/Transfer Station
The lighter isotopic species concentrate whilepressurizing the permeator in the Tritium Fill Station
E25066c
6
Medium-pressuresystem
High-pressuresystem
T/D = 1.62
T/D = 1.60T/D = 1.62
PermeatorDiaphragmcompressor
TFS
T/D = 2.33
Composition in %: H/D/T
Variation in T/D downstream of the TFS = 1.2%
Gas chromatography uses iron-doped alumina at 77 K to separate the hydrogen isotopologues
E26599b
3
Minimum aliquot size: 80 nLError:
– systematic 1.2% – relative (peak to peak) <0.5% – reproducibility <0.2%
Fe-dopedMS 5 ÅLN2
Helium
Helium
MS 5 Å80°C
NeonTCD
Sample
Vacuum
Neon
P
TM
TCD
MS: molecular sieve TM: tritium monitor TCD: thermal conductivity detector
The assaying process requires four steps; first step: evacuate the injection volume
E26599c
4
Fe-dopedMS 5 ÅLN2
Helium
Helium
MS 5 Å80°C
NeonTCD
SampleVacuum
Neon
P
TM
TCD
To effluent capture
To effluent capture
Pump
Fe-dopedMS 5 ÅLN2
Helium
Helium
MS 5 Å80°C
NeonTCD
SampleVacuum
Neon
P
TM
TCD
To effluent capture
To effluent capture
Pump
Second step: charge the loop with a predefined aliquot of gas
E26599d
5
Minimum aliquot size: 80 nL
VacuumTo effluent capture
Pump
Fe-dopedMS 5 ÅLN2
Helium
Helium
MS 5 Å80°C
NeonTCD
Sample
Neon
P
TM
TCD
To effluent capture
Third step: inject the aliquot into the separation column and detection circuit
E26599e
6
Fourth step: sample analysis
E28005
7
00.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
2 4Time (min)
O2 CH4
COSign
al (m
V)
6 8
Fe-dopedMS 5 ÅLN2
Helium
Helium
MS 5 Å80°C
NeonTCD
Sample
Vacuum
Neon
P
TM
TCD
To effluent capture
To effluent capture
0
3
6
9
Sig
nal
(V)
Time (min)0 20 40
50% T91% T
T2
HTDT
Time (min)0
0
1
2
20
H2T2
HT
HD
5.45% H60.62% D33.93% T
40
Det
ecto
r sig
nal (n
V)
60
D2 DT
The 4-cm3 tritium monitor and thermal conductivity agree within 1% over all T/D ratios
E28001
8
1.04
1.03
1.02
1.01
1.00
0.99
0.98
0.97
0.960 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Tritium fraction from thermal conductivity detector
TCD error: !1.5%
Triti
um m
onito
r/the
rmal
con
duct
ivity
The minimum aliquot required for analysis by the TM is 0.01 nL.The gas inventory of a typical target is ~20 nL!
Sample
Vacuum
Neon
PDiaphragm
MKSbaratrongauge
Hand weld Microweld
Microweld
0.125
Hand weld
SS-4-VCR-1
Hand weld
6LV-4-VCR-3S-4TB7
SS-4BK-TW-1Cwith Cu STEM
60% of the gas delivered to the gas chromatograph is not used for analysis
E28002
9
Injection loop volume: 1.5 mLPressure transducer andisolation valve volume: ~2.24 mLVolume injected for assay: 3.74 mL (4.84 Ci)
Selector valvePressuretransducer
Backup 4B safetyisolation valve
0Pressure (Torr)
200 400 600 800 10000
20
40
60
80
Volta
ge (m
VDC)
Voltage (mVDC) = 0.0762 P(Torr) –2.369R2 = 0.9997
The volume of the pressure detector and isolation valve assembly has been miniaturized ~200 fold
E28003
10
Injection loop volume: 1.5 mLPressure transducer andisolation valve volume: <10 nLVolume injected for assay: ~1.5 mL (1.9 Ci)
Tritium interacts with stainless steel to generate CH4 and CO
E26600a
11
Impurity growth rateVessel ID CH4 CO677 21.2 14.3624 1.9 6.0
* Time after filling the sample vessel
00
30
60
90
120
150
2Time (min)
Sig
nal
(m
V/s
cc)
4
544 ppm 307 ppm265 ppm
60 ppmCO CO390 ppm
64 ppm169 ppm33 ppm
Vessel ID 677 Vessel ID 625
6 8 00
30
60
90
120
150
2Time (min)
4 6 8
51 h*601 h
66 h*602 h
CH4 CH4
0
2
1
3
Pro
tiu
m c
on
cen
trat
ion
in f
uel
(%)
0 600
Duration since purifying fuel (days)
1200
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2OHO
HO
Evacuated
Absorbedwater layer
Bulkmetal
Baked
Tritiumconditioned
HOH
M
M
M
M
M
HH
H
H
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO
H2O
H2O
HTOTO
HO
TO
TO
HOHTO
HM
M
M
M
M
HH
H
H
TM
M
M
M
M
HT
H
T
Assay vessel1.88 %/mo
Permeation cell
Contamination caused by
sample vessel
“D” and “T” exchange with adsorbed water layers on the inner surfaces of the sample vessel and the process loop
E26601b
12
• Direct measurement of the protium content in a gas contained in unconditioned vessels leads to 300% errors in the protium fraction
LLE is participating in the national lab round robin gas-analysis exercise
E28004
13
SampleID Composition Nominal
mixture (%)Measured
valueRSD*(%)
1 H2 35 42.95 0.11HD – 3.01 0.80D2 65 54.04 0.05H/D 53.8 80.02 0.16
3 H2 20 30.02 0.02HD – 44.30 0.06D2 20 25.50 0.01H/D 1 1.10 0.06
* Relative standard deviation
The isotopologue ‘HD’ dominates the H2/D2 spectrum in the Mass Cal Gas sample
2525 202015 1510 105 5
300
150
10
5
Time (min)Time (min)
Sign
al (m
V) H2
H2
D2
D2
HD
HD
Sample #1 (H2/D2) Sample #3 (Mass Cal Gas)
Need to run a calibration gas to confirm the locations of the non-hydrogenic species
1
0.5
Sign
al (V)
642Time (min)
H2
N2
CH4COorAr
This column can not identify CO2
Composition of Mass Cal Gas• H2• D2• N2• Ar• CH4• CO2
E28000
14
Outline/Summary
• Thermal conductivity and tritium monitor detector measurements are complementary and predict similar atom fractions in H/D/T mixtures within 1%
• Miniaturization of the pressure sensing detector and the effluent isolation valve will reduce DT injection quantities for assay by 60%
• LLE has analyzed two of the three inactive gas samples provided by Sandia National Laboratories as part of the round robin exercise to compare assay results across the complex
top related