equal justice for all the lofty goal above the main entrance into the united states supreme court...
Post on 31-Mar-2015
212 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CH. 18-3 THE SUPREME COURT
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
JUDICIAL REVIEW
“equal justice for all” the lofty goal above the main entrance into
the United States Supreme Court building The Supreme Court of the United States is
the only court specifically created by the Constitution (Article III, Section 1)
Most courts, federal and state, may exercise the critically important power of judicial review
JUDICIAL REVIEW—deciding the constitutionality of an act of government
The Supreme Court is the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution
The Constitution doesn’t specifically provide for the power of judicial review
There is little doubt that the Framers intended that the federal courts—and, in particular, the Supreme Court should have this power
MARBURY V. MADISON The first assertion of power came in
1803 Thomas Jefferson was elected President
in 1800 and the Democratic-Republicans took control of both houses
The Federalists tried to pack judgeships with federalists before they left office
Congress created several new judgeships in the early weeks of 1801
Defeated President Adams quickly filled them with federalists
William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace in DC
The Senate confirmed him and late on the night of March 3, 1801, President Adams signed the commissions of office for Marbury and a number of other judges
The next day Jefferson became President and noticed that several commissions had not been delivered
Jefferson was angered by the Federalists’ attempted court-packing
He ordered Secretary of State James Madison not to deliver the commissions to the “midnight justices”.
William Marbury went to the Supreme Court
He was seeking a WRIT OF MANDAMUS (see note p. 518)
Marbury based his suit on the Judiciary Act of 1789 which created the judiciary
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously against Marbury because they found the part of the law used as a basis for the suit to be in conflict with the Constitution
Chief Justice John Marshall based his opinion on three points:
1) the Constitution is the supreme law of the land
2) all legislative acts and other actions of government are subordinate to the supreme law and cannot conflict with it
3) judges are sworn to enforce the provisions of the Constitution
THE EFFECTS OF MARBURY Chief Justice Marshall claimed that the
Supreme Court had the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional
The Supreme Court also hears cases where constitutionality is not the issue
SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION
The Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction
Two types of original jurisdiction: 1) those to which a state is a party 2) those affecting ambassadors, other
public ministers, and consuls
HOW CASES REACH THE COURT
Nearly 8,000 cases are appealed to the court annually
Of these the court only accepts a few hundred
Court selects cases based on “the rule of four”—at least four justices must agree to put the case on the docket
More than half of the cases are disposed of in brief orders
Ex.—The court many remand (return) a case to a lower court for reconsideration
Most cases reach the Court by WRIT OF CERTIORARI (latin—”to be made more certain)
This writ is an order by the Court directing a lower court to send up the record in a given case for review
Either party can ask the Court to issue a writ
When certiorari is denied, the ruling of the lower court stands
A few cases reach the Court by CERTIFICATE
This process is used when a lower court is not clear about procedure or the rule of law that should apply in a given case
HOW THE COURT OPERATES
Term: First Monday in October to sometime the following June or July
ORAL ARGUMENTS The Court hears oral arguments in two-
week cycles. They hear arguments in several cases for
2 weeks and then spend 2 weeks considering those cases and handling other business
The Court convenes at 10:00 am Monday-Thursday for oral arguments
Each party is given 30 minutes to present their side during oral arguments
BRIEFS Briefs are written documents filed with
the Court before oral arguments begin
These documents support a particular side of the case and usually state relevant facts and previous cases that are similar
These documents could have hundreds of pages
The Court may also receive AMICUS CURIAE (friend of the court) briefs
These briefs are filed by people who are not parties in the case but have substantial interest in the outcome
The Solicitor General, an officer in the Department of Justice, is often called the Federal Government’s chief lawyer
The S.G. represents the USA in all case to which they are a party in the Court
The S.G. also decided which cases the government should ask the Court to review and what position the USA should take in those cases
THE COURT IN CONFERENCE On Wednesdays and Fridays during the
term the justices meet in conference In almost complete secrecy the justices
discuss cases in which they have heard oral arguments
The Chief Justice presides and speaks first on each case
The other justices speak in order of seniority
About 1/3 of all cases are unanimous decisions
Other decisions are decided by split votes
People have criticized the Court for split decisions but most cases are very difficult issues
Most cases are controversial. The easy cases don’t get to the Court
OPINIONS If the Chief Justice is in the majority, he
assigns an associate justice to write the opinion
If the Chief Justice is not in the majority, the senior associate justice assigns someone to write the opinion
The Court’s opinion is often called the MAJORITY OPINION
This document sets out the final decision of the Court and the reasons behind the decision
The majority opinions stand as PRECEDENTS (examples to be followed in similar cases)
Justices that agree with the decision might issue a CONCURRING OPINION (to add or emphasize a point)
Justices that don’t agree with the majority might submit a DISSENTING OPINION
THE END
top related