evaluation coordinators dtse c1 meeting...

EVALUATIONCOORDINATORSDTSEC1MEETINGSPAIN

1. PEDAGOGICALINNOVATIONANDCREATIVITY

1.1. INNOVATION1.1.1. Arenewmethodologies used? (Investigationprojects, artistic creationprojects,

entrepreneurshipprojects,learning-serviceproject...)

85.4%ofthecoordinatorsconsiderthatnewtechnologiesarebeingappliedwitha

assessment of “very good” or “excellent”. Only one person thinks that the using of new

methodologiesisconsidered“poor”.

1.1.2. Arenewstudentgroupsformed(mixedinternationalteams)?

Figure1

Aswecansee85.4%ofthecoordinatorsthinkthatgroupmixedareformedina“very

good” or “excellent” way. Only 16.7% of the coordinators consider that mixed

internationalgroupsareformedpoorly.

1.1.3. Areweworkingandcollaboratingwithotherareasofthecentre?

Figure2

Figure3

All the coordinators think thatweare allworkingwithother areasof the centre

especiallyinentrepreneurship,foreignlanguages,informaticsandeconomy.

1.1.4. Isthereanyartisticorliteraryproduction?

Almost all the coordinators (87.4%) think that there is artistic and literary

productionwithanassessmentof“verygood”or“excellent”.

1.1.5. Areweexploringtechnologicallywithourteammatesnewformsofteaching?

Figure4

Figure5

El100%ofthecoordinatorsthinksthatweareexploringtechnologicallywithour

teammatesnewformsofteachinginawayof“verygood”or“excellent”.

1.1.6. Canyouidentifythedesiredlearningresults

Figure6

Figure7

The 100% of the coordinator thinks that we can identify the desired learning

resultswithanassessmentof“verygood”or“excellent”.

1.1.7. Canyouverifyacceptablelearningevidence?

The 100% of the coordinator thinks that we can verify acceptable learning

evidenceswithanassessmentabove“verygood”.

1.1.8. Areyouplanningeffectivelearningexperiences?

Figure8

Almostallofthecoordinators(83.3%)saythattheyareplanningeffectivelearning

experiences.

1.1.9. Ratetowhichdegree/amountthegoalsareagreedupon

1.1.10. Istheprocessofworkperfectlydefined?

Figure9

Figure10

Theprocessofworkisperfectlydesignediswithanassessmentof“verygood”in

50%and“excellent”inother50%.

1.1.11. AreTangibleorintangibleresultsobtained?(developmentofstudentand

teachers)

Figure11

Figure12

All of us consider that we have obtained tangibles results with a assessment of

excellentina83.3%

1.2. CoordinationduringtheProject

1.2.1. Howlongdoyoudevotefortheprojectperweek?

1.2.2. Sometimestheschoolcalendardoesn’tmatchamongthepartners.Isitaproblem

toreachtheobjectivesoftheproject?

Figure13

Obviously it’s not a problem to reach our objective of the project although our

schoolcalendardoesn´tmatch.

1.2.3. Isthereaplanningfortheactivitiesthatwillbeworkedon?

100%thinkthatthereisaplanfortheactivitiesthatwewillworkon.

1.2.4. WhatITtoolsarebeingused?

1.2.5. Whichonesdoyouconsidershouldbeused?

2. INTEGRATIONINTHESTUDYPLAN

2.1. Formaleducation

2.1.1. Integratedinvariousareas?

Figure14

Obviouslyourprojectisintegratedinvariousareas.

2.1.2. Integratedinthecentre’syearlyplan?

Also we think that our project is integrated in the centre’s yearly plan with an

assessmentof“excellent”in83.3%

2.2. Informal(trasnversal)education

Figure15

Figure16

2.2.1. Entrepreneurship culture program?

2.2.2. Readingandlibraryprograms?

3. COMUNICATIONANDINTEGRATIONBETWEENPARTNERCENTRES

3.1. Whatisexchangedbetweenteachers?Information,creationofactivities.

3.2. Whatisexchangedbetweenstudents?Information,creationofactivities.

Figure17

Figure18

3.3. Areinternationalteamscreated

3.4. Arethecommunicationinstrumentsinsideyourschoolworking?

3.5. Arethecommunicationinstrumentsbetweendifferentcountriesworkingout?

Figure20

Figure19

4. COLLABORATIONBETWEENSCHOOLCENTRES

4.1. Doestheworkplanfacilitatethateveryonecollaboratesequallysothefinalproductis

balanced?

Theassessmentaboutthecollaborationsothefinalproductisbalancedis“verygood“

in20%and“excellent”ina80%.

5. USEOFTECHNOLOGY

5.1. Arethestudentsintegratedintheproject?

Figure21

Figure22

Ourentirestudentareintegratedintheproject.

5.2. AretheyregisteredinTwinspace?

50%ofourstudentsareregistered inTwinspaceandtherestaregoingtoregister in

thefuture.

5.3. Doesetwinningturnintoourformofteaching?

Figure23

Figure24

Figure25

WethinkthateTwiningisbeingturningoutinourformofteachingprogressively

5.4. Arethetechnologyandprogramsselectedadequateforreachingthesetobjectives?

Theevaluationofthetechnologyandprogramsselectedforreachingtheobjectives is

“excellent”.

6. RESULTS,IMPACTANDDOCUMENTATION

6.1. Didtheprojectspreadoutofthecentre(tothefamilies,thetownhall...)

6.2. Istheprojectbeingsharedorspread?

Figure26

Figure27

Aswecanseeallofusthinkthatourprojectisbeingspreadandsharedamongallthe

sectorsofthesociety.

6.3. Strengthsandweaknesses?

6.4. Didweinformabouteverythingdoneintheproject?

Weinformabouteverythingdoneintheprojectinadvance.

Figure28

Figure29