evaluation of a workplace asthma self-management program
Post on 03-Feb-2016
15 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of a Workplace Asthma Self-Management
ProgramNeil J. MacKinnon, Ph.D., FCSHP
Associate Professor & Associate Director for Research
Dalhousie University College of PharmacyHalifax, Nova Scotia
What is Inspire at Work?
Medavie Blue Cross, a benefits carrier, partnered with 7 employers in the province of New Brunswick, GlaxoSmithKline and Dalhousie University.
Information sessions were held in workplaces to recruit participants; participation was voluntary.
Two pre-scheduled private educational sessions were held with a certified asthma educator at 3 month intervals (60 – 90 minutes).
The asthma educator performed an asthma assessment and spirometry testing, assessed puffer technique and developed an asthma action plan with the patient.
6 & 9 months follow-up assessments were conducted.
The Participants
73.7%
20.2%
5.1%
1%
Employees (73)
Spouses (5)
Dependents (20)
Other (1)
•69.7% Female•30.3% Male
•Average Age 39yrs
105 Participants enrolled in the study with 99 completing it (5.7% drop-out)
Breakdown by Participant Type:
In total, the asthma educator identified 188 problems related to asthma care in these 99 patients, an average of 1.90 problems per patient. Potential Drug-Related Problems (pDRPs) – 53 identifiedNon Drug-Related Problems (nDRPs) – 89 identifiedDrug-Related Problems (DRPs) – 46 identifiedPublished in the March/April issue of CPJ
Asthma-Related Problems Identified
Economic Outcomes – Medication Claims data analysis
Percent Changes: Pre vs. Post
Asthma Drugs
Antibiotics
Inspire at Work Participants
39.10% 23.10%
Everyone BUT Inspire at Work
17.60% 0.00%
The change in asthma drug claims is not surprising given the types of DRPs the Asthma Educator found:
Need additional therapyNeed higher dosageNon-compliance
27.7
98.0
0
50
100
Baseline
3 months
2.853.97
0
2
4
Baseline
3 months
Percentage of patients with a score of 4 (S)
Average Score (S)
Inhaler Technique:
Medication Adherence/Usage
0.860.15
0
0.5
1
Baseline
9 months
Self-reported paid work days lost over past 3 months by employee participants (NS)
Self-reported school days lost over past 3 months by child/dependent participants (S)
1.16
00
0.5
1
1.5
Baseline
9 months
Economic Outcomes - Absenteeism
85.4
95.9
80
90
100
Baseline
9 months
88.6
96.0
80
90
100
Baseline
9 months
Percentage of time you are able to be as productive as normal while bothered by asthma? (S)Percentage of work accomplished while bothered by asthma? (S)
Economic Outcomes - Productivity
During the past 3 months, how many days did you experience asthma symptoms at work? (S)
5.3 1.8
0
2
4
6
Baseline
9 months
Overall, Inspire at Work appears to have had a positive impact on workplace productivity.
Costs associated with delivering the program:• Asthma Educator’s time & travel costs,
marketing material, delivery support, data entry, employee time, supplies
Savings realized through:• Increased Productivity (reduced
absenteeism and reduced presenteeism)
$4.24 return on every dollar spent towards the program
Return on Investment (ROI)
Overall, Inspire at Work had a positive impact on asthma symptoms
35.261.6
0
50
100
Baseline
9 months
For someone to ‘pass’ the 30 Second Asthma Test, they must answer ‘no’ to all 5 of the following questions:
The percentage of patients who answered ‘no’ to all 5 questions. (S)
Do you use your blue inhaler 4 or more times per week?
Do you cough, wheeze or have a tight chest because of your asthma?
Do coughing, wheezing or chest tightness wake you at night?
Do you stop exercising because of your asthma? Do you ever miss work or school because of
your asthma?
30 Second Asthma Test
The questionnaire featured 24 questions which addressed many asthma-specific QoL issues.
Sample questions: Does your asthma limit you in these activities over
the last 3 months? Climbing one flight of stairs
Did you limit the kind of work or other activities that you did?
For every question in the Quality of Life (QoL) survey, there was a statistically significant improvement in scores across the 4 times points.
Humanistic Outcomes: Quality of Life
Conclusions
Increasing healthcare costs are causing employers and benefits carriers in Canada to think of innovative solutions to this issue.
Inspire at Work, while increasing asthma drug costs, had a favourable ROI and positively impacted clinical and humanistic outcomes.
top related