every student, every teacher every leader to think, act, and …file/… · 2016-2017 school year...
Post on 01-Aug-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Strategizing to empower EVERY student, EVERY teacher and EVERY leader to think, act, and perform beyond our
expectations….
1. Communicate an inspiring vision and Coherent Strategic Plan
2. Grow a Rigorous Academic Program with a focus on Continuous Improvement of Teaching and Learning
3. Create a safe and respectful environment throughout the district and in every school
4. Create an organizational system that functions in support of the Strategic Plan
5. Family and Community Engagement
14-15
• TEVAL Calibration with Revision
• Hunt for a Curriculum Director and begin building the Vision of the Graduate
• Coherence Conference
• Pilot Math Program
• Principals present strategic plan to BOE
15-16
• Coherence plan around improving math instruction
• Competencies Developed aligned with CCSS and VoG
• Shift from TEVAL feedback to Instructional Rounds for PD and Leader Moves
• Focus question: How are ALL students demonstrating excitement for math learning, conceptual understanding and using math to make sense of the world and solve problems
• Principals present focus area to BOE
16-17
• Involve teachers in IRs
• Focus Question: Using and understanding math to reason and solve problems
• Build admin cohorts to support one another with learning plans
• District Grade level task design and calibration
• Design professional learning for student outcomes
17-18
• Build coherence as we shift our focus from Math to inquiry and competence in and across all subjects
• Revise and ensure our tasks create opportunities for students to construct meaning and entry points for all learners
• Continue to examine our measures to ensure that we are monitoring progress toward competence
• Empower students, leaders and teachers with self efficacy – their relationships and the experiences they create matter most
Reading
More students in T1
Less students in T3
Math
More students in T1
Less students in T3
Attendance
More students attending every day
Less students chronically
absent
Discipline
Less Incidents leading to ISS
and OSS
Less chronic offenders
Survey Results
Graduation
• Students
• Families
• Teachers
• More students graduating with cohort
• More students persisting to graduate
NWEA2015
• T1 66.3%
• T3 17.0%
• 65 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
2016
• T1 67.7%
• T3 14.4 %
• 67 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
2017
• T1 69.4%
• T3 13.3%
• 66 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
SBAC2015**
• T1 48.4%
• T3 25.6%
2016
• T1 48.2%
• T3 25.7%
2017
• T1 48.0%
• T3 27.9%
**gr 11 and Tasks
NWEA2015
• T1 54.6%
• T3 22.8%
• 57 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
2016
• T1 60.3%
• T3 18.9%
• 67 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
2017
• T1 62.4%
• T3 18.6%
• 69 Percent Meeting Projected Growth
SBAC2015**
• T1 29.1%
• T3 37.3%
2016
• T1 32.1%
• T3 34.8%
2017
• T1 41.2%
• T3 29.3%
**gr 11 and Tasks
Student Attendance
2015
• ADA 94.5%
• Chronic 13.5%
2016
• ADA 94.5%
• Chronic 14.1%
• Chronic* 11.7
2017
• ADA 95.0%
• Chronic 13.5%
• Chronic* 11.3
Teacher Attendance
2015
• ADA 94.5%
• Chronic 13.5%
2016
• ADA
• Chronic 4%
2017
• ADA 95.4%
• Chronic 7%
Student Discipline
2015
• Incidents 759
• Chronic 92
2016
• Incidents 657
• Chronic 66
2017
• Incidents 695
• Chronic 65
Students Gr 3-4
2015
599 participants
88% Favorable
2016
603 participants
88% Favorable
2017
587 participants
89% Favorable
Students Gr 5-12
2015
2203 participants
72% Favorable
2016
2039 participants
78% Favorable
2017
1902 participants
78% Favorable
Teachers2015
307 participants
83% Favorable
2016
301 participants
85% Favorable
2017
321 participants
87% Favorable
Families2015
1145 participants
89% Favorable
2016
1568 participants
93% Favorable
2017
1740 participants
94% Favorable
Cohort 2015
85.6
2016
85.22017
More teachers with more Students meeting
projected growth
More Students meeting
projected growth
Student performance
would increase
2015
2 teachers had 100% of their students meet their projected growth
4 teachers had more than 90% of their students meet their projected growth
2016
7 teachers had 100% of their students meet their projected growth
11 teachers had more than 90% of their students meet their projected growth
2017
14 teachers had 100% of their students meet their projected growth
17 teachers had more than 90% of their students meet their projected growth
2016-2017 school year
81/87 elementary sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Math
68/87 elementary sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Reading
21/36 intermediate sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Math
17/28 intermediate sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Reading
13/36 middle school sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Math
22/35 middle school sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Reading
2/13 Grade 9 sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Math
2/12 Grade 9 sections had 60%+ meet projected growth in Reading
In 2016-17, 21% of 11th graders taking the school-day SAT met both ERW and Math benchmarks; 46% met the ERW benchmark, and 22% met the math benchmark
In 2016-17, 22% of 10th graders taking the PSAT/NMSQT in the fall met both ERW and math benchmarks; 57% met the ERW benchmark, and 23% met the math benchmark.
In 2016-17, 25% of ninth graders taking the PSAT 8/9 met both ERW and Math benchmarks; 56% met the ERW benchmark, and 27% met the math benchmark.
In 2015-16, 40% of 4th grade students met all four standards on the Connecticut Physical Fitness Assessment.
In 2015-16, 54.6% of 6th grade students met all four standards on the Connecticut Physical Fitness Assessment
In 2015-16, 69.0% of 8th grade students met all four standards on the Connecticut Physical Fitness Assessment.
In 2015-16, 36.1% of 10th grade students met all four standards on the Connecticut Physical Fitness Assessment.
If we expect every student to become the Vision of the Graduate…
How do we design a system that expects and ensures that every student in every class every day is becoming the Vision of the Graduate?
Does our Vision of the Graduate need revision?
Discussion
Redesign Strategic Plan and Indicators of Success
5 Priorities become 3
1. Engage the community as partners in the every student becoming VoG(combines 1 & 5)
2. Every student in every class every day thinking deeply and attaining competence
3. Organizational systems to support every student, every class, every day
Priority #1
➤ Engage the Naugatuck Community in sharing the responsibility for creating experiences that will ensure that all students become the Vision of the Graduate
With your team, answer the following question:
1. Does the Priority capture the essence of the real work? Recommend revisions or wonderings
Priority #1
➤ Engage the Naugatuck Community in sharing the responsibility for creating experiences that will ensure that all students become the Vision of the Graduate
Rationale: If we engage the community in a shared understanding and commitment to the Vision of the Graduate and the NPS competencies, then all citizens will be equipped to support and sustain students as they become the Vision of the Graduate.
With your team, answer the following question:
1. Does the rational explain how what we think we need to do (IF) and if done well, would it yield the desired result (then)? Recommend revisions or wonderings
Hand Out Whole Structure for Priority 1
Look at the strategies – will they work? What would you add? Delete? Wonderings
Look at the indicators – how do they work - recommendations
top related