experience frameworks 2014

Post on 20-May-2015

129 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

This is a proto-syllabus for a course titled EXPERIENCE FRAMEWORKS to be taught by J. Kevin Byrne in spring semester 2014 at the Minneapolis College of Art + Design.

TRANSCRIPT

X W

1. The new millennium has ushered the simple word of "wayfinding"

from old language (signage) into exciting new territories (literally),

such as smart cities, sensor networks, volunteered geography, GPS,

and Google Earth (to name a few).

2. You will get skilled with principles, methods, and new tools that help

people find their way through a wide range and level of settings, e.g.,

museum paintings, websites, zoos (and other edutainment land-

scapes), and various information-environments (of interest to you).

3. You will read about, research, and propose various navigation

structures to address (or redress) societal problems via maps or

other experience-design narratives using artistic maps, Google Earth

Pro, Google Tour Builder, and/or your preferred digital media.

Calendar

1/19 Scale, mobility, and spatial intelligence

1/26 Eye glance theory and methods

2/2 Technology-supported capture of glance paths

2/9 Website navigation; history of navigation

2/16 User trips

2/23 Framingafieldstudy,datagatheringmethods

3/1 Field work at Como Park Zoo

3/8 Proxemics

3/15 Smartphone navigation apps and other software

3/22 Wayfindingasaprofession

7KLV ZHHN P\VHOI DQG D IULHQG YHQWXUHG RXW WR WKH 0LQQHDSROLV ,QVWLWXWH RI $UWV IRU DXVHU WULS DQDO\VLV� :KHUHLQ , ZDV LQVWUXFWHG WR ORFDWH DQG VNHWFK WKH SDLQWLQJ L FKRRVHIRU IRU WKH FODVVHV¶ XVDELOLW\ ¿HOG WULS WZR ZHHNV DJR� 7KDW SDLQWLQJ LV &ODXGH 0RQHW¶VStill life with Pheasants and Plovers. 8SRQ HQWHULQJ WKH PXVHXP , JHW D IHHOLQJ RIIDPLOLDULW\ DQG D YLEH IURP WKH VWDII� , LPPHDGLDWHO\ ZDON WRZDUG WKH FRDW �RU EDJ�FKHFN DQG SODFH P\ EDJ RQ WKH FRXQWHU SURFHHGLQJWR WDNH P\ VNHWFKSDG DQG SHQFLORXW� +RZHYHU� EHIRUH , UHFLHYH D JUHHWLQJ OLNH ³+HOOR³ RU ³+L� JRW D EDJ WR FKHFN"³ WKHJUHHWLQJ , UHFLHYH LV ³,¶P QRW VXUH \RX¶OO EH DEOH WR EULQJ \RXU WULSRG LQ�³ , WKHQ UHSO\³,¶P VXUH LW¶OO EH DOULJKW� , JR WR 0&$' DQG LW¶V MXVW D VWRRO WR VNHWFK�³� 7KH DWWHQGHHWKHQ ZDUQV PH DERXW ZKDW VHFXULW\ PLJKW VD\� , WKDQNHG KHU DQG ZDON GLUHFWO\ LQWRWKH PXVHXP� 0\ ¿UVW REMHFWLYH ZDV WR ¿QG *���� , ZDONHG VWUDLJKW WR WKH VWDLUV DQGDVFHQG DVVXPLQJ WKDW *��� ZRXOG EH RQ WKH WKLUG OHYHO� %HIRUH , UHDFK WKH WKLUG OHYHO, VHH DQG JXDUG�FXUDWRU ZDQGHULQJ WKH VHFRQG ÀRRU ZKRP L WKHQ DVN WR ³SRLQW PH LQWKH ULJKW GLUHFWLRQV³� 7KH GLUHFWLRQ WKDW JXDUG JDYH PH WKHUH� DW WKH WKLUG DYHQXH ZLQJRI WKH VHFRQG ÀRRU ZHUH WKRURXJK HQRXJK WR JXLGH PH DOO WKH ZD\ WR WKH ,PSUHVVLRQ�

,Q FRQFOXVLRQ� WKH PDMRU LPSURYHPHQWV WKDW FRXOG DQG VKRXOG EH PDGH EDVHG RQ WKHLQIHUHQFHV PDGH DQG GDWD DEVRUEHG IURP WKLV XVHU WULS DQDO\VLV DUH DV IROORZV�

$� ,PSURYHPHQW RI EDJ FKHFN DWWHQGDQW H[SHUWLVH RI WKH ,QVWLWXWH¶V SROLFLHV DQG UHJX-lations.

%� ,QWHUDFWLYH YLUWXDO JDOOHU\ QDYLJDWLRQ JXLGH NLRVN ORFDWHG DW WKH 7DUJHW :LQJ DQG3rd Avenue entrances.

&� 5HQWDEOH GUDZLQJ VWRROV �MXVW OLNH WKH RQH .HYLQ RZQV�

'� 6WXGHQW &KHFN�,Q IRU 0&$' 6WXGHQW WR DYRLG EHLQJ ERWKHUHG RU PLVWDNHQ DV RQH�WLPH RU ¿UVW WLPH SDWURQV ZLWK RGG HTXLSPHQW�

(� 6SHFLDO 0&$' VWXGHQW +RXUV RI SRVVLEO\ ���SP RU ����� ����SP WR DOORZ VWXGHQWZKR KDYH H[WHQVLYH DVVLJQPHQW PRUH ÀH[LEOH WLPH WR H[HFXWH VDLG DVVLJQPHQWVVOLJKWO\ RXWVLGH RI WKH UHJXODU ,QVWLWXWH SXEOLF KRXUV�

Eyeglancetheoryandmethods–cont’d

The top image is the original painting like on the previous page.

The lower image is all of my classmates’ results. Where their eye went.

From this we can see, that a lot of people’s eyes went to certain ‘hot spots’.

Like the people in the image or anywhere there was something going on or bright/dark spots in the painting.

species #-anim activity visitor-age v-constellation cum-min anim-heightbrown bear 3 3 31.11 2.44 1.89 6caribou 3 1 32 3.33 2.33 5.5zebra 2 3 41.43 2.43 1.59 5.5bison 3 2 40 3.33 1.17 5.5lemur 2 2 45 1 3 3spider monkey 4.33 3 36.3 2.6 3.46 1.5arctic fox 2 1 32.5 3.5 4 0.9

Hypothesis: An hypothesis was made in MCAD's Experience Frameworks class that behavior of engaged visitors at a zoo (as measured by mean length of visitors' observation period) will correlate positively with an animal's mean height. Stated another way, the taller an animal the longer a zoo visitor will stay to watch.

-0.93cum-min to height correlation

-0.65visitor-age to v-constell. corr.

AquaDom in Berlin’s Radisson Blu Hotel

http://youtu.be/_Oeu5JTDRUc

top related