final report industrial energy e˜ciency project in thailand
Post on 13-May-2022
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Final ReportIndustrial Energy E�ciency Project in ThailandPrepared byProject Management Unit
Contents IEE Project in Brief 03 - 08
Chapter 1 09 Project Management
1.1 Background 11 1.2 Project Design 12 1.3 Project Activities 13 1.4 Project Management Structure 16 1.5 GrantandCo-financing 17 1.6 EquipmentandAssets 17 1.7 ProjectIndicatorsandAchievement 18 1.8 Conclusion 22
Chapter 2 23 Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.1 CapacityBuildingApproach 25 2.2 TrainingMaterialDevelopment 25 2.3AwarenessRaisingofEnergyEfficiencyintheIndustry 26 2.4BuildingCapacityofFactoryPersonnel 29 2.5ScalingUptheLocalImpactsthroughNationalExperts 31 2.6EnhancingtheCapacityofFinancialInstitutionsandBanks 33 2.7 ClosingtheLoopwithTrainingforotherrelevantstakeholders 35 2.8 CommunicationChannelsforPeer-to-PeerNetwork 37 2.9LessonsLearned 38
Chapter 3 39 Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization
3.1 EnMSImplementationinParticipatingFactories 41 3.2 System Optimization Assessment 42 3.3ImplementationImpactsofEnMSCapacityBuilding 44 3.4ImplementationImpactsofSOCapacityBuilding 44 3.5LessonsLearned 44
Chapter 4 45 Project Sustainability
4.1 KnowledgeSharing 47 4.2 Project’sContributiontoReplication 52 4.3 Market Transform for EnMS and SO 52
Chapter 5 53 Project Monitoring
5.1 Mid-termEvaluation 55
IEE Project in Brief
4
IEE Project in Brief
5
IEE Project in Brief
6
IEE Project in Brief
7
IEE Project in Brief
8
IEE Project in Brief
9
Chapter 1Project Management
Chapter 1
Project Management
10
Chapter 1Project Management
In Chapter 1 the project background is described to provide the rationale of the project initiation. The project design, includ-ing its project activities and project management structure, is also explained. Insights to the project budget and co-financing from the project partners are provided. Lastly, the achievements of the pro-ject are illustrated based on the key performance indicators stated in the project document.
11
Chapter 1Project Management
1.1Background
In Southeast Asia, Thailand has been a leaderin the promotion of energy efficiency. The Thaigovernment has been proactive in fostering anenergy efficiency culture and industry has beena receptive and active participant. Taking stock oftheenergysituationinthecountryintermsofhighenergy usage, import bills, energy security andenvironmental concerns, the Thai governmentstructured its energy policy, legal and regulatoryframeworks in line with the promotion of energyefficiencyandrenewableenergystartingfromtheearly1990’s.
Althoughenergyefficiencyhasbeenpromotedwiththe support from Thai government through policyand relevant funds, and adopted by Thai industrywith some investments, the level of achieve-ment was still limited based on three significantobservations, namely the low rate of industry’sparticipation to implement energy efficiencymeasures, the focus on component-based ener-gyefficiencymeasures,and thead-hocpracticeofEnergyManagementSystemwithinThaiindustry.
Overtime,theThaiindustryhasmadesomeinvestments in energy efficiency supported by several major initiatives such as the energy conservationfund,energyefficiencyrevolvingfund,utility-basedDSM,TotalEnergyManagement(TEM)programand active ESCO industry. In spite of this, realizationof energyefficiency initiativesby the industries toaddressthehighenergyconsumptionsituationhasbeenratherlow.Thisissupportedbytheindustrialinformationfromthe2007IndustrialCensusWholeKingdom (National Statistical Office) that only1,445 enterprises (5.5%) out of about 26,100medium and large factories have participated inthegovernmentinitiatives.
Thai industriesalso tendto focusmoreon individ-ualsystemcomponentssuchasmotors,pumps,orboilers, rather than on thewhole system. Currentpracticesshowmoreemphasisonthereplacementof components than on equipment maintenancepractices.Mostofthesereplacementsandalsotheoriginal design of the system are not taking intoaccount the energy optimization aspects and areoversizedormismatchedtothe loadrequirements,which are likely to remain for the lifetime of equipment.Moreover,itisobservedthatduringtheclassic energy audit, the typical energy efficiencymeasures such as efficient lighting, leak detections and insulationwere preferred by Thai
industry. There is limited penetration of energy efficientmeasures and technologies at the system levelstocapturehigherlevelofenergysavings.
During the PPG phase, the survey results showedthat only 18.8% of the respondent factories hadone person full time on energy management andabout44%ofthefactoriessurveyedspentlessthan10 hours per week on energy management. Itreflects that energy management is still ad-hocpracticeinThaiindustryasitisnotintegratedwiththemanagementsystem.For themediumto largeindustry, Thailand has introduced national energymanagement standards targeted towards designat- ed factories and buildings with power demand of morethan1,000kWand/orthatconsume20,000GJper year. This is a government initiative rooted inenergyconservationlawsandregulation.Whilethebasic notions of energy management has beenaccounted for in the regulation, the approach haslimited traction in terms of incorporating energy management in the current management structure,asopposed toother ISOstandardsadoptedby theindustriessuchasISO9000andISO14000.
In spite of present practices of energy efficiencyimprovements,thereisageneralconcernatthegov-ernment level about the inefficiency improvementfrom energy usage in Thai industry. The energyefficiency programs and initiatives in the countryhavenotdeliveredcomprehensivecapacitybuildingfocusedontheThaiindustrialsectorfortheuptakeofenergyefficiencyatthesystemlevels.Therefore,the Department of Industrial Promotion (DIP),Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI), and theDepartmentof IndustrialWorksunderMinistryofIndustry have cooperatedwith theDepartment ofAlternative Energy Development and Efficiency(DEDE)underMinistryofEnergytoaccessfundingfrom the Global Environment Facility (GEF) toimplement the Industrial Energy Efficiency (IEE)Project.TheUnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganization (UNIDO), GEF’s executing agency,hasworkedcloselywithThaigovernmentpartnersin designing the Project, developing the projectproposalandfinallyimplementingtheIEEProject.
12
Chapter 1Project Management
1.2Project Design
Initially,theIEEprojectwasa5-yearprojectstartingon 6 March 2012. However, during the projectimplementation, a 1-year extensionwas requestedandtheprojectistoterminateon30June2018.
The project partners are shown below.•DepartmentofIndustrialPromotion(DIP)•ThaiIndustrialStandardsInstitute(TISI)•DepartmentofIndustrialWorks(DIW)•DepartmentofAlternativeEnergy DevelopmentandEfficiency(DEDE)•SmallandMediumEnterprise DevelopmentBankofThailand•CIMBThai
Theobjectiveoftheprojectistopromoteindustrialenergy efficiency through adoption of ISO basedenergy management standards and systemoptimization approach for improvement of energyperformance of industries to make its operationsmorereliableandcompetitive.
Based on the review during the project initiationphase, theprojectwasdesigned to focuson threeareas, which supplement each other and areimperative in mobilizing the industry toward thesustainable practice of energy efficiency. Theseareas consist of:
1 Energy Management System (EnMS): Oneofthekeybarrierstosustainenergysavings infactoriesistheintermittentimplementationof energyefficiencymeasures.Thereisalsolimited monitoringon the implementedmeasures.Asa result, the energy savings in the factories are fluctuating.EstablishinganEnMSinthefactories isoneofthepotentialapproachestoincorporate energy efficiency as a regular working practice andsustainthesavingresultsintheorganization. For that reason, the Project promotes EnMS implementation to enhance the industry’s competitivenessthroughthereductionofenergy consumption,whichinturncontributestolower GHGemissions.
2 System Optimization (SO): The typical energymeasures emanate from the component-based assessment of, for example, boilersandaircompressors.Byconsideringonly onecomponent inthesystem,e.g.boiler inthe steam system, the energy efficiency measures implementedmaycauseanegativeimpactonthe otherpartsofthesystemandreducethepotential savings.TheProjectpromotesasystemapproach toenhancetheenergysavingopportunitiesand capture alternative perspectives of energy efficiency assessment. The concept of system optimization,which includes the assessment of fourareas-generation, distribution, end use and recovery -, is introduced to Thai industry. In additiontothetypicalenergyaudit,thefactories with EnMS implemented can use the system optimizationassessmenttoidentifytheimprove- ment opportunities during the energy planning process.
3 Financial evaluation of energy efficiency projects: The investment for energyefficiencyopportuni- ties may vary from no investment to high investments. It is a good practice to financially evaluate the opportunities before preparing the actionplanand implementing themeasures.To facilitatetheimplementationofenergyefficiency measures,theProjectprovidestheknowledgeof financial evaluation at two levels, the project evaluation for internal approval and theproject evaluationforloansubmission.
13
Chapter 1Project Management
To promote the three knowledge areas – EnMS,SOandfinancialevaluation, theprojectdecided todeployacapacitybuildingapproachfollowedbytheimplementation of demonstration projects, whichshowcase the EnMS and SO implementation insome selected factories. For technical transferprojectslikethisone,ithasbeenshownthatskillstransfer through education is more effective andsustainable than solely transferring the technolo- gies/ approach. Enhancing the knowledge and capacitiesatthelocallevelensuresthatsolutionsare not justapplied once, but will continuously be adapted to the future and local context. The capacity building activities in the project are designed to provide different level of knowledge and practices to different stakeholders by considering their involvement in EnMS and SOimplementation.
To supplement the capacity building, the demon-stration of EnMS and SO implementation providemore information and act as the evidence toconvince other factories to adopt the approach.Theconsultancyservices for these implementation projects were carried out by the National Experts(NEs)trainedwithintheProject’scapacitybuildingprogram. Thereby, the NEs could apply theknowledgeacquiredandformpartofanetworkforthedisseminationofEnMSandSOimplementationinthefuture.
The linkage of these three areasis shown in Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1 Linkage of EnMS, System Optimization
and financial evaluation
FinancialEvaluation
EnMSSystem
Optimization
1.3Project Activities
The project activities have been carefully designed to integrate the focus areas and implementationapproaches.ThetechnicaltransferfrominternationalexpertstoThaiexperts,factorypersonnelandrelevantstakeholders has been carried out with adaptation to the Thai context. The project activities are grouped intofourcomponentsasshownbelow.
1 ISO compliant energy management systems: ThiscomponentisdesignedtoincreasethenationalawarenessonISO50001,todeliverthe ISO50001trainingtonationalexperts,factorymanagementandpersonnel,andtoestablish apeer-to-peernetworkamongindustrialenterprises.
2 Industrial energy systems optimization: Theenergysystemsoptimizationtraining,consistingofsteam,compressedair,fan,and pumpsystem,isdeliveredtonationalexperts,factorymanagementandpersonnelaswell as manufacturers and vendors.
3 Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity: Theindustrialenergyefficiencyfinancingcapacitywillbeenhancedthroughtraining forbanks/financialinstitutionsandfactorymanagement.
4 Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects: Toincreasetheadoptionofenergymanagementstandardsandsystemsoptimization, theprojectwillfacilitatetheimplementationofenergymanagementsystem(ISO50001) andenergysystemoptimizationprojectsinselectedfactories.
14
Chapter 1Project Management
The detailed activities of each component are described in Table 1.1.
Component 1: ISO compliant energy management system
Component 2: Industrial energy systems optimization
Table 1.1 Summary of project activities
Output Project Activities
Output 1.1:Trainingmaterialandtoolsonenergymanagementdeveloped
Output 1.2:NationalawarenesscampaignlaunchedonISO50001
Output 1.3:Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrained on energy management systems
Output 1.4: Peer-to-Peer network betweenindustrialenterprisescreatedandoperational
Output 2.1:Trainingmaterials,softwareandtoolsonsystemsoptimizationdeveloped
Output 2.2: Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonoptimizationofsteam,compressedair,fan and pumping systems
Output 2.3: Equipmentvendors/supplierstrainedonsystemsoptimization
•Reviewofexistingenergymanagementactivities andidentificationofindustryneeds•Preparation,development,andproductionof trainingmaterialsandtoolsinEnglishandThai
•Productionofpromotional/mediamaterialto promotetheISO50001standard•ProductionofarticlestointroduceISO50001in standardnewspapers,journalsandmagazines•EventlaunchofthestandardISO50001/ thelaunchofUNIDO’sIEEproject•Organizationofseminarroadshowsinthe country tointroduceISO50001toentrepreneurs, membersofThaiindustryassociations/organiza- tions
•Selecttraineestobecomenationalexpertson energy management based on agreed criteria•Providelogisticssupportforthetraining• Conduct trainings on energy management systemfornationalexperts• Conduct trainings on energy management forfactorypersonnel
•Exchangeinformationwithindustriesand establishapeer-to-peernetwork
•Preparation,development,andproductionof trainingmaterialandtoolsinEnglishandThai
•Selecttraineestobecomenationalexpertson systems optimization based on agreed criteria•Providelogisticssupportforthetraining• Conduct trainings on system optimization fornationalexperts•Selectfactoriesandconducttrainingsonsystem optimizationforfactorypersonnel
•Selectequipmentsuppliersandconduct trainingsfor50vendorseachonsystems optimizationofpumping,steam,fan,and compressed air systems
15
Chapter 1Project Management
Component 3: Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity
Component 4: Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects
Output 3.1:Harmonizedprojectevaluationcriteria
Output 3.2:Capacityofbanks/FIsenhancedonEEprojectsfinancing
Output 3.3:Trainingmaterialdevelopedandindustrymanagerstrainedonthedevelopmentoffinancialproposals
Output 4.1: Energy managementsystemsimplemented
Output 4.2: Documented systemoptimization demonstration projects
Output 4.3:Recognitionprogramdevelopedandimplemented
•Developandharmonizecriteriaforevaluationof industrialenergyefficiencyprojectsforfinancial institutions
•Developguidelinesforenergyefficiencyprojects evaluationbythefinancialinstitutions•Disseminateenergyefficiencyprojectevaluation criteriaandguidelinesamongfinancialinstitutions
•Compileanddisseminateinformationon financialincentives/schemesavailableforinvest- mentsinenergyefficiencyprojectsinThailand•Developtrainingmaterialandtoolsonbankable energyefficiencyprojectsforindustrialfacility personnel•Trainfactorypersonnelonenergyefficiency financingandbankableenergyefficiency projectsproposalsdevelopment
• 200industrialenterprisesimplementoperational improvement projects after receiving energy management trainings• 50industrialenterprisesimplementactivities towardconformancewithISO50001•Registrationofenterpriseswhoimplemented projectsinthepeer-to-peernetworks
• 75assessmentsundertakentoidentifysystems optimizationopportunitiesintheindustrial facilities• 50industrialenterprisesimplementsystems optimization projects
• Set up energy performance indicators for recognizingimprovementonenergyefficiency inthepeer-to-peernetworks•DIPandDEDErecognizesindustriesthroughthe awardsbasedontheenergysavingperformance indicators
TheprojectactivitiesaimtosupportThaiindustries,especiallythetargetsectorsidentifiedduringtheproject’sPPGstudy.Theinitialsixindustrysectorswereselectedbasedonthecountryneedsandpriorities.Thetargetsectorsregroup48.3%oftheestablishmentsinthemanufacturingsector.Therewereabout12,600mediumandlargeenterprisesinthesesectors.Thelistofthetargetsectorsisshownbelow.
1 Foodproductsandbeverages
2 Textiles
3 Chemicals
4 Rubberandplasticproducts
5 Non-metallicandmineral
6 Basicmetal
Duringthe2ndprojectsteeringcommittee(PSC)meetingon14May2013,thecommitteehasdecidedtoaddthePulpandPapersectorinthelistoftargetsectors.Therefore,therearetotally7targetsectorsintheproject.
16
Chapter 1Project Management
Figure 1.2 Structure of Project Steering Committee Figure 1.3 Structure of Working Group
Chairperson(DG of DIP)
Chairperson(DIP)
Vice Chair(DDG of DIP)
Vice Chair(DSG of TISI)
Sceretary (PMU)
Member(DIP)
Member(SME BANK)
Member(TISI)
Member(CIMB)
Member(DEDE)
Member(FTI)
Member(DIW)
Member(OIE)
Member(UNIDO)
For theday-to-day operation of theproject, theProjectManagementUnit (PMU)was in charge. ThePMUprepared reports to fulfillGEF’s andUNIDO’s requirements. Themembers ofPMUconsistedof aNationalProjectCoordinator(NPC),aProjectAssistant,ProjectEngineers,andaDriver
1.4 Project Management Structure
TheimplementationofallactivitiesplannedundertheprojectwillbesupervisedbyDIPthroughtheProjectSteeringCommittee(PSC).Initially,thePSCconsistedofhighlevelrepresentativesfromtheDIP,TISI,DEDE,DIW,participatingfinancialinstitutions,industryassociationsandUNIDO.UndertheguidanceofDIPduringthesetupofthePSC,therepresentativeofOfficeofIndustrialEconomics(OIE)wasinvitedtojointhePSC.ThestructureofPSCisshowninFigure1.2andthelistofPSC’smembersisinSessionA.1ofAnnexA.
TheprimaryrolesofthePSCaretoprovideoverallguidancetotheimplementationoftheprojectandtoensuregood coordination among participating agencies and other organizations. The PSCwill meet every year tomonitorimplementationprogressandconfirmtheworkplanforthesubsequentyear.
TherewerefivePSCmeetingsheldduringtheprojectimplementation.TheminutesofmeetingofPSCcanbefoundinSessionA.2toA.7ofAnnexA.
SincethePSC’smeetingwasorganizedonceayear,thePSCagreedtosetupaWorkingGroup(accordingtothedecisionmadeatthePSCmeetingon19February2014),whichwouldberepresentedbythefocalpointsofeachgovernmentpartners,tofacilitatethemanagementoftheprojectandworkcloselywithPMUasassignedbythePSC.Thestructureof theWorkingGroup isshown inFigure1.3andtheWorkingGroup’smembers arelistedinSessionA.1ofAnnexA.
Vice Chair(TISI)
Member(DIP)
Member(TISI)
Member(DEDE)
Member(DIW)
Sceretary(DIP, PMU)
17
Chapter 1Project Management
1.6Equipment and Assets
One of the identified barriers to energy efficiencyimplementationisthelackofequipmenttomeasurethe energy data, which is used to analyze theperformance indicators of the energy system. Forthat reason the project has allocated part of itsbudget to procure equipment,whichwas used fortrainingandsupportingtheparticipatingindustriesduringtheEnMSimplementationandSOassessment.At the end of the project, the equipment wastransferred to the project’s partners according tothe PSC’s decision made at the 5th PSC meetingon 17 January 2017. The list of equipment andthe receiving partner is shown in Session C.1 of AnnexC.
Inaddition,theprojecthasprocuredofficefurniture,computers, phones, office supplies, and vehicle tosupporttheoperationoftheproject.Attheendofthe project, these assets were transferred to DIPaccording to the PSC’s decision made at the 5thPSCmeetingon17January2017.ThelistofassetsisshowninSessionC.2ofAnnexC.
1.5Grant and Co-financing
TheGEFgrantfortheprojectwas$3,620,000.Theco-financing contribution from Thai partner statedintheprojectdocumentis$15,645,000intermsofcash,in-kindandloan.
The GEF grant of $3,620,000 was utilized forthe project implementation. Since the projectemphasized on the technical knowledge transfer,about 39% of the grant was used for the inter-national experts. The national experts and staffswere accounted for 20% of the expenditure.The cost of subcontracts for workshop/trainingorganizing and other relevant studies was about15%.Theexpenditurefortheequipmenttosupporttrainingandimplementationwasabout10%ofthegrant. The details of budget allocation and grantutilizationareshowninSessionB.1ofAnnexB.
Duringtheprojectimplementation,thePMUtrackedthe co-financing made by the Project’s partners(detail is inSessionB.2ofAnnexB).TheMinistryofIndustrycontributedabout$1,708,600(70%ofthe co-financing stated in the project document).The DEDE contributed $1,633,885, which morethan the amount stated in the project document.Theindustriesparticipatingintheprojectactivitiesused$1,328,605(27%oftheco-financingstatedintheprojectdocument)offinancialsupportproductsprovidedbyDEDE.Theindustrialsector,whichwasnotincludedintheprojectdocument,hasalsomadeagreatcontributiontotheprojectwiththeamountof$1,825,893. This reflects thewillingness of the industry tomanage their energy and reduce theirenergy costs.
18
Chapter 1Project Management
1.7Project Indicators and Achievement
Byfollowingagoodpracticeofprojectplanning,theprojecthasestablishedtargetsattheproject leveland theactivitylevel.ThemonitoringoftheresultshasbeenplannedwiththeguidancefromPSCandtheproject’spartners.At the terminationphase, it canbe concluded that the results of theproject implementationhassuccessfully achieved the targets stated in the project document, except for one activity, which will be describedlater.
Fortheprojectimplementationperiod,thefollowingproject’stargetshavebeenset.• 83,712MWhofelectricitysaving• 1,914,142GJoffuelsaving• 196,757tCO2ofGHGemissionreduction
Based on the energy savings information of 129 factories participating in the implementation supportedactivities, the project andwilling to share such informationwith the project, itwas found that the energysaving and GHG emission reduction of the energy efficiency measures implemented by the participatingfactorieshavewellachievedtheproject’starget.Theelectricitysavingsamountto111,307MWh.Thefuelsavingis2,713,001GJ, and theGHGemission reduction is equivalent to247,047 tCO2. Thecomparisonof surveyresultsandtargetisshowninFigure1.4.Thedetailsoftheimplementedmeasuresandthecalculationofenergysaving can be found in AnnexD.
Tokeeptrackoftheproject’sactivities,theindicatorsandtargetshavebeenincludedintheprojectdocument.Mostactivitieshavewellachievedtheirtargets.Theindicators,targetsandachievementofeachcomponentisshowninTable1.2.
Figure 1.4Energy savings and the GHG reduction of the energy efficiency measures implemented
by the participating factories compared with the project’s targets
Target 83,712 1,914,142 196,756
Electricity Savings (MWh) Fuel Savings (GJ) GHG Reduction (tCO2)
Project’sachievement 111,307 2,713,001 247,047
19
Chapter 1Project Management
Component 1: ISO compliant energy management systems
Component 2: Industrial energy systems optimization
Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component
Output TargetIndicators Achievement
Output 1.1: Trainingmaterialandtoolsonenergy managementdeveloped
Output 1.2: Nationalawareness campaign launchedonISO50001
Output 1.3:Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonenergy managementsystems
Output 1.4: Peer-to-Peer network betweenindustrialenterprisescreatedandoperational
Output 2.1: Trainingmaterials,softwareandtoolsonsystemsoptimizationdeveloped
Output 2.2: Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonoptimizationofsteam,compressedair,fan and pumpingsystems
Output 2.3: Equipmentvendors/supplierstrained on systemsoptimization
Availabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandtools
Promotionalliteraturedistributed to industriestopromotetheadoptionofISO50001
• 500factorymanagers attendthemanagement workshop
•300factoriessendtheir personneltoEnMSuser training
• 50NationalExperts trained on EnMS
Allparticipatingenterprisessharetheirimplementationplanonenergymanagementonthenetworkandlearnfromothers’experienceandresults
Availabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandtools
•400factorypersonnel attended SO user training
• 50NationalExperts trained on SO
Trainingof50equipmentsuppliers/vendorsofenergyefficientproductsinSO
Done
Done
100%(612managers)
100%(364factories)
100%(62NEs)
Done
Done
100%(1,126personnel)
96%(48NEs)
100%(60companies)
Trainingmaterialon EnMS provided toindustrialenterprises
Nationalcampaignprovided informationto industry to adoptISO50001
Numberoftrainednationalexpertsandfactorypersonnel
Networkestablishedandused to support program recognition and presentsavingsresultfromenergy management
TrainingmaterialonSOprovidedtoindustrialenterprises
Numberoftrainednationalexpertsandfactorypersonnel
Numberoftrainedequipmentvendors/suppliers
20
Chapter 1Project Management
Component 3: Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity
Output TargetIndicators Achievement
Output 3.1:Harmonizedprojectevaluationcriteria
Output 3.2:Capacityofbanks/FIsenhancedonEEprojectsfinancing
Output 3.3:Trainingmaterialdevelopedandindustrymanagers trained onthedevelopmentoffinancialproposals
CriteriaforevaluatingEEprojectsaredevelopedandharmonizedbymainfinancialinstitutionsinThailand
StrengthenedcapacityoffinancialinstitutionsandlocalbanksonEEprojectsevaluation
AvailabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandguidelinesspecificallysupportingthedevelopmentoffinancialproposalsforEEprojects
Industrialfacilitymanagers/personnelhavethecapacitytoanalyzeSOandenergymanagement projects anduse energy and O&M costs reduction project
ReportCompleted
Done
Done
Done
EvaluationcriteriaareharmonizedwithinthefinancialinstitutionstohelpthemselectbestEE projects
Numberoffinancialinstitutionsandlocalbankspersonneltrainedto understand mainfeatures of EE projectsand better appraiseEEprojectsproposals.
Trainingmaterialrelatingtofinancingofenergyefficiencyprojectdevelopmentarepro-vided to industries
Numberoftrainedfacilitymanagers/personnelinindustrialenergyefficiencyprojectdevelopment
Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component (cont.)
21
Chapter 1Project Management
Output TargetIndicators Achievement
Component 4: Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects
Output 4.1:Energy managementsystemsimplemented
Output 4.2:Documentedsystem optimizationdemonstration projects
Output 4.3: Recognitionprogramdevelopedandimplemented
200factoriesadoptedenergymanagementplansandcompletedoperationalimprovement projects
50factoriesadoptedandimplementedISO50001
Participating factoriesregisteredwiththepeer-to-peer networkreport energy savings
75systemassessmentsconducted
50completedsystemsoptimization projects
25casestudiesshowingGHGemissionreductions
Formalrecognitionoffactoriesachievingpower/fuelconsumptionreductionsreflectedingovernment reports
100%(200factories)
100%
Done
100%(76assessment)
100%(74projects)
100%
Done
Numberoffactorieswithenergymanagementplansimplemented
Numberofcase studies
Numberoffactoriesregistered for peer-to-peer network
Numberofcompletedsteam,pumping,fanand compressed airsystems assessments
Numberofcompletedsystems optimizationprojects
Recognition program for participating companiesestablishedbasedonsuccessfulachievements
Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component (cont.)
22
Chapter 1Project Management
1.8Conclusion
The project has been under implementation for 6.5years.Theactualimplementationwascompleted within 6 years. The 6 months of terminationphase were used for report preparation and finalevaluation.
The project has achieved all the indicators set at theactivitylevel,exceptforthenumberofNational Experts on System Optimization, which onlycounted48NEsfromthetargetof50NEs.
The project has achieved the targets in terms of energy savings and GHG emission reduction. The electricity savings amount to 111,307 MWh. The fuel saving is 2,713,001 GJ, and the GHG emission reduction is equivalent to 247,047 tCO2.
23
Chapter 1Project Management
Chapter 2
Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
24
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
This chapter describes the capacity building activi-ties conducted during the project. It starts with the description of the capacity building approach original- ly used and its change as a results of participant’s feedback and gap analysis. The next sections present the training materialsdeveloped during the pro-ject implementation, the training activities conduct-ed, and the communication channels for the peer-to-peer network. Finally, the lessons learned from the capacity building program are reported.
25
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.1Capacity Building Approach
Theaimofcapacitybuildingprogramistodevelopand enhance the capacity of the relevant stake-holderswhoplaymajorrolesintheimplementationof energy management system and systemoptimization. The program is designed to providedifferent levels of knowledge from overview toin-depth technical trainingwith different learningapproaches such as through lectures, workshopsand on-the-job training to ensure its suitability torelevant stakeholders. The relevant stakeholderstargetedbythecapacitybuildingprogramincludedfactorymanagement,factorypersonnel,researchers,lecturers, government officers, consultants, bankpersonnel, and equipment vendors/suppliers.Additionalstakeholders,namelyESCOs,equipmentservice providers, certification body (CB) and accreditation body (AB),were added at the imple-mentation start as a result of the stakeholder analysis.
After conducting several trainings andworkshops,the feedback from theparticipantswereanalyzed.The project has revised two existing trainings,awareness workshop and vendor training, anddesigned 6 new training courses consisting of CBTraining, AB Training, EnMS Intensive Training,SSO Technical Training, CaSO Technical Training,BiomassBoiler’sOperatorsTraining.
The detail of capacity building program and itsadjustmentundertheproject is in Session E.1 andE.2ofAnnexE.
2.2 TrainingMaterial Development
Todevelopthetrainingmaterial,theprojectstartedwith reviewing the trainingmaterials used by theproject’spartnersandotheragenciestounderstandwhat has been delivered for industries andwhat has been left out. The review results werecommunicatedtotheinternationalexpertsinorderto adjust UNIDO’s training materials and tools tosuit the Thai context. The training materials forthe awareness workshop and 2-day user training,whichwereinEnglish,havebeentranslatedtoThailanguage. All training materials were printed anddisseminatedduringthetrainingsandworkshops.
The materials and tools allowed industrial facility managers and personnel to understand the importance of energy management systems/standardsandsystemoptimization,andactas thesources for industry to start implementing EnMSand/or conduct system optimization assessmentthemselves.
Forthefinancingcomponent,thetrainingmaterialswere developed based on the training need assessment results conducted with banks andindustries. Interviews and questionnaires/surveyswere used to collect data. Two sets of materialsand tools were developed, one for banks and onefor industries.
Detail of trainingmaterials and tools is inSessionE.3ofAnnexE.
26
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.3Awareness Raising of Energy Efficiency in the Industry
2.3.1 Inception Workshop
The project’s partners and UNIDO co-organized the inception workshop on 6 June 2012 to announce thestartingoftheprojectandhighlightingtheprojectactivitiestothetarget industriesandotherstakeholders.TheMinisterofIndustry,H.E.Mr.PongsvasSvasti,gavethekeynotespeechandwelcomedtheaudience.ThemanagementofDIP,TISI,DEDEandCIMBThaijoinedthediscussionpanelandemphasizedtheircooperationundertheprojecttosupporttheindustrytoachievetheirenergyefficiencytarget.Therewere146participantsattending the inception workshop. The group picture of the high-level management participating in theinceptionworkshopisshowninFigure2.1.
Figure 2.1 The Minister of Industry and other management in the project
2.3.2 Awareness Campaign
The national awareness campaign providedinformation on ISO 50001 energy managementstandards to industries, equipment suppliers,and service providers by highlighting the benefitsof shifting from current operations to energymanagement practices. The introduction to thesystemapproachwasalsoincludedinthecampaignto promote system optimization. The campaignconsistedof3elementsasdescribedbelow.
1 Project’s awareness raising: To increase the awarenessandreliabilityoftheIEEproject,the project distributed a bag and pen with the project’stitleandwebsiteduringtheworkshops and trainings.Manyparticipants used the bag andpenafterattendingtheproject’sactivities, whichhelppromotetheprojecttoothers.
2 Information dissemination: The information materialsdisseminatedbytheprojectconsisted of a leaflet, a notebook, roll-ups, and articles. Theprojectdevelopedthe leafletandnotebook toexplainwhattheprojectisabout,theconcept ofEnMSandSO,and thecontactdetails.The leafletandnotebookshown inFigure2.2 were distributedduringtheworkshopsandtrainings. The leaflet was also used to introduce the projectduringthemeetingwithindustries.
The roll-upmaterialswere installed during the workshops and trainings to allow the partici- pantstolearnmoreabouttheproject.
InApril 2017, anEnMSarticlewritten by the PMU was published in the quarterly journal producedbytheOfficeofIndustrialEconomics. 3
27
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
Figure 2.2 Project leaflet
3 Awareness workshop: Theawarenessworkshopsinthefirstyearofprojectimplementationwerecarried out by international experts with a half-day presentation. The translators were used to translate from English to Thai. The presentation covered the global and Thai energy situation, climate change threat, challenges of energy management, role of EnMS in improving competitiveness, overview of energy managementsystemanditsbenefit,introductionofsystemoptimization,andhowtoinitiateEnMS.After theNationalTrainersfromthe1stbatchofEnMSexpert trainingwereready, theNationalTrainerstook over the role of speakers for the awareness workshops. The afternoon session was added to include the sharing of experiences from the representatives of host facilities. 18 awareness workshops were carried out from 2012 to 2016 with the attendance of 604 factory managers from 535 target factories.Thetargetintheprojectdocumentstated500factorymanagers.Thus,theactualperformance achieved is equivalent to 121% of the target. The details of the awareness workshops is shown in SessionE.4ofAnnexE.
28
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.3.3 Final Seminar
To disseminate the project’s results, the projectpartners, together with the PMU, arranged thefinal seminar on 20 December 2017. There were169participants,39femaleand122male,attendingthefinalseminarconsistingof111factorymanagersand personnel, 4 consultants, 3 representatives from institutes, 16 government officers, 16 repre-sentatives from equipment vendors and service providers,18representativesfromCBs,and1from theothercategory.
TheseminarstartedbyawelcomespeechgivenbyMr. Stein Hansen, Regional Director and UNIDORepresentative in Thailand. Then, Mr. SanjayaShrestha, project manager, provided brief infor-mation about the project and its achievements.Although the project was approaching thetermination phase, the project partners wouldcontinue to provide their support to the industry.The presentation of what will be provided waspresented by the representatives of project’s part-ners. One of the objectives of the final seminarwas to convince additional factories to implementEnMS and system optimization. Therefore, thelessons learned from industries and success casesfrom the selected factories were presented to theparticipants by the national experts and thefactories’ management. Lastly, the recognition ofthefactoriessuccessfully implementingtheenergyefficiency measures was carried out through thecase study award competition. One company received the award for best case study and 3companies received awards for outstanding case study.Theawardandcertificateswerehandedoverto the companies’ management by Mr. SakolThinakul, representative of the Thai GEF FocalPoint. Pictures of the final seminar are shown inFigure2.3.
Figure 2.3 Final seminar
29
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.4Building Capacityof Factory Personnel
Toimproveenergyefficiency,thefactorypersonnelplay a critical role as they are the ones whoimplement EnMS and optimize the systems suchassteam,compressedair,pumping,orfansystem.Although trainings on EnMS and energy conser-vationwere available in themarket, it was foundthat the contents of the courses offered by theprojectweredifferentfromothertrainingsastheyemphasized practical knowledge and the use ofcalculation tools to support the assessments. Thetrainingcoursesespeciallydesignedforthefactorypersonnel consisted of EnMS 2-day user training,SO 2-day user trainings, and financial evaluationof industrial energy efficiency projects. Therewere three more advanced courses available forthe factory personnel who wanted to learn moretechnical-oriented knowledge and practice onmeasurement,namelytheEnMSintensivetraining,theSSOtechnicaltrainingandtheCASOtechnicaltraining.
2.4.1 EnMS 2-day User Training
The existingEnMS trainingwasprovided by TISI.ThecoursecontentfollowedtheISO50001standard,clause by clause. After the project started, TISIandtheprojectagreedtousetheEnMS2-dayusertraining as a standard EnMS course for TISI. TISIsupported the project by arranging 3 to 4 EnMStrainings per year. TISI and the project have intotalco-organized24EnMSusertrainingstocoverall regions in Thailand. There were 796 factorymanagementandpersonnelfrom364targetfactoriesattending the user training. The target in projectdocument is300target factories.Thus, theactualperformance achieved 121% of the target. ThedetailsoftheEnMS2-dayusertrainingisshowninSessionE.5ofAnnexE.
2.4.2 SO 2-day User Training
DIP has provided energy-related trainings underthe Total Energy Management (TEM) projectsince 2004. In the TEM project, both public andin-housetrainingswereofferedfortheparticipatingfactories. However, the TEM’s training mostlyfocused on awareness raising. Therefore, DIP andthe project agreed to co-organize SO trainings forfour systems consisting of Steam System Optimi-zation (SSO),CompressedAirSystemOptimization(CASO), Pumping System Optimization (PSO) andFan SystemOptimization (FSO). Each SO trainingwasorganizedfor2dayswithamixoflecturesandexercisesusingcomputersandcalculators.DIPandthe project have in total co-organized 31 SO usertrainingstocoverallregionsinThailand.Therewere1,126 factory personnel from 344 target factoriesattendingtheusertraining.Thetargetintheprojectdocumentstated400factorypersonnel.Thus, theactualperformanceachievedis282%ofthetarget.Thedetailsofthe2-daySOusertrainingisshownin SessionE.6ofAnnexE.
2.4.3 EnMS Intensive Training
In2016,TISIandtheprojectagreedtodevelopthenew EnMS intensive courses consisting of 4-dayclassroom training, homework, and teleconferenceto discuss issues with international experts. Thiscourse was intended to provide more technically-oriented knowledge on EnMS implementation.The training was divided into 2 modules with2-dayclassroomtrainingeach.Thehomeworkwasassigned after the 1st module with the monthlyteleconference support from the internationalexperts. The 1st module was organized during29-30June2016andthe2ndmodulewasorganizedduring 12-13 September 2016. There were 36participants, 10 female and 26male, fromvariousindustrial sectors, CBs, TISI, consultancies, andacademia. The certificates were granted to theparticipantswhopassed the exam,whichwas satonavoluntarybasis.Therewere22participantswhosattheexamand16outof22gotthecertificate.
30
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.4.4 SO Technical Training
Basedonthereviewoffeedbackfromparticipantsand the vendor’s brainstorm session, DIP and theproject added new technical courses on SSO andCASO. The 2-day technical trainings with 2-hourwebinarsweredesignedtofillthegapbetweentheuser trainingandexpert training.Theyweremoreadvancedthantheusertraining,however,theydidnotincludetheopportunitytoconductassessmentwiththehostfacility.Tocompensatethishands-onexperience, the participants would learn fromexercises based on actual cases and the demon-stration of equipment usage. The certification ofcompletion was awarded to participants whoattended the whole training session and success-fullypassedtheexam.Alltechnicaltrainingsweredeliveredbytheinternationalexpertsandnationaltrainers.
The 1st SSO technical training was conductedduring6-7 June2016. Therewere23participants,4 female and 19 male, attending the training. 14outof23participantssattheexamwithasuccessrateof57%or8participants.The2ndSSOtechnicaltrainingwasconductedduring11-12October2016.Therewere18participants,6 femaleand12male,attending the training. 15 out of 18 participantssat the exam with a success rate of 80% or 12participants. The CASO technical training wasconducted during 22-23 September 2016. Therewere 31 participants, 6 female and 25 male,attending the training. 18 out of 31 participantssat the exam with a success rate of 72% or 13participants.
2.4.5 Biomass Boiler’s Operator Training
In2017,DIPandtheprojectidentifiedthetrainingneedofbiomassboileroperatorsfromthestudyofbiomassboilersanditssteamsystemimprovement.Thebiomassoperator’strainingcoursewasthereforedeveloped to provide a better understanding ofbiomass boiler operation and how to optimize itssteam system. Four trainings were organized inSamut Sakhon, Nakhon Ratchasima, Surat Thani,andBangkok.Therewereatotal206participants,28 female and 178 male, attending the trainings.122 out of 206 participants were from the targetsectors.
2.4.6 Training on Financial Evaluationof Industrial Energy Efficiency Projectsfor Industries
The 2-day training on financial evaluation ofindustrial energy efficiency project for industrieswasdesignedtofamiliarizethefactory’spersonneltothebank’sunderwritingprocessandintroducingthe toolsand ratios thatare typicallyused for theconsideration process. The workshop on financingand ratio calculationof corporate cashflow in thecase energy efficiency project implementationwasconducted on the second day of the training toallow theparticipants topracticewith actual caseinformation. DEDE and the project co-organizedthreetrainingsduring2-3March2015,23-24March2015 and 23-24 April 2015 in Bangkok with 87participants,10femaleand77male,from40targetfactories.
31
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.5Scaling Up the Local Impacts through National Experts
The UNIDO international expert team providedtraining for Thai experts. These individuals sub-sequently assumed the roles of National EnMSexperts and National SO experts. They became asource of national energy management and SOexpertise, and served as multipliers for projectimpacts such as trainers and consultants availableto the industry. To build up the training capacityand ensure the consistency of training delivery,the selected national trainers were specificallytrainedtodelivertrainingsinthreestages:observingthe international experts teaching, co-teachingwith the international experts, and teaching withinternational experts observing and commentingonteachingtechniques. Inadditiontothesesteps,a train-the-trainer session was organized betweentheinternationalexpertsandtheselectednationaltrainers to go through the training materials,exercisesandtrainingactivities.
To recruit candidates for the expert trainingprogram, the PMU prepared the announcementanddistributeditthroughDIP’s,TISI’sandDEDE’snetwork. The applicantswere requested to submitCVs and attend an interview session with theinternational experts. The successful applicantswere thereafter invited to attend the expert training.
The EnMS expert training was divided into 3modulesdeliveredwithin 10 to 12months.During the1st and 2ndtrainingmodule,thetraineesworkedcloselywiththeassignedhostfacilitytoimplementEnMS.The trainees and international expertshadmonthlyteleconferencestosharetheprogressanddiscuss problems and issues faced in the imple-mentation phase. Inmodule 3, the trainees had achance to practice the internal audit at the host facilityundertheinternationalexperts’supervision.In order to earn the title ofUNIDO’s national ex-perts, the traineeshad to submitafinal reportontheEnMS implementation in thehost facility andsuccessfullypasstheEnMSexpertexamination.
Therewere twobatchesofEnMSexpert trainingsorganized during the course of theproject. The 1st
trainingwasorganizedduring2012and2013,andthe2ndbatchwasorganizedduring2014and2015.Forthe1stbatch,therewere38participantswith29successfulnationalexperts,4femaleand25male.Forthe2ndbatch,therewere46participantswith33 successful national experts, 11 female and 22male.Intotal,therewere62qualifiedEnMSnationalexperts, which account for 124% of the project’starget. The list of all EnMS national experts is showninSessionE.7ofAnnexE.
The typicalmodel of SO expert training consistedof 1-2 days classroom training, 2-3 days on-sitetraining, system optimization assessment with acandidate plant, and examination. To be entitledas a qualified SO national expert, the traineeshad to attend all training sessions, complete theassessmentreportandsuccessfullypassSOexpertexamination.
ThereweretwobatchesofSSOexperttraining,twobatches of CASO expert training, two batches ofPSOexpert training,andonebatchofFSOexperttraining. The details of each SO expert training isshowninTable2.1.Intotal,therewere48qualifiedSOnationalexperts,6 femaleand42male,whichaccount for96%of theproject’s target.The list ofallSOnationalexperts is shown inSessionE.8ofAnnexE.
32
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
Table 2.1 Detail of SO expert training
The PMU identified the potential barriers causingalowernumberofnationalexpertsthanexpected.Theanalysis isbasedonthediscussionwithsomecandidates, feedback from the participants, andobservationduringtrainings.Thepotentialbarriersinclude:
• Thelongerperiodbetweenthelastdayoftraining andexaminationdate,thelargerthedropoutof thecandidates.Onaverage,76%ofcandidatessat theexamination.ThecandidatesfromPSOexpert trainingbatch1andbatch2attendedtheexam onlyattherateof65%and27%,respectively.It tookmorethanayearafterthelasttrainingday beforetheexaminationcouldbearranged.
• OnlyonegroupfromPSOexperttrainingbatch2 couldfindcandidateplantstocarryoutthePSO assessment. Although pumping system is a typicalutilitysysteminplants,itisverydifficult toidentifyapumpingsystemwithsuitablemotor sizesandtheirusagetobecomeastudycase.As aresult,othercandidateshesitatedtoattendthe examination because theywould not be able to submittheassessmentreport.
• Theexpert trainingonPSObatch2wascarried out in2016and the examinationwasorganized in 2017. Some of the experts did not see the benefitofearningthecertificatesincetheproject wasapproachingitsfinalphase.
No.Number
ofTrainees
Number of Qualified
National ExpertsTraining
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
19
11
18
14
17
15
15
109
11
6
9
11
5
0
6
48
SSOexperttrainingbatch1
SSOexperttrainingbatch2
CASOexperttrainingbatch1
CASOexperttrainingbatch2
PSOexperttrainingbatch1
PSOexperttrainingbatch2
FSOexperttraining
Total
TheprojecttrainedatotalofsevennationaltrainersonEnMS,sixnationaltrainersonSSO,sixnationaltrainers onCASO, threenational trainers onPSO,andonenationaltraineronFSO.
Before being entitled as national trainers, theselected candidates had to prove themselves byco-teaching together with international expertsand deliver the training themselves under thesupervision of international experts. They wererequired to attend a train-the-trainer session, inwhich the international experts explained thebackground of the course design, materials usedforthetraining,andhowtocarryouttheworkshopsandexercisesessionsinthetraining.
The availability of national trainers provided theflexibilityoftheprojecttodelivertrainingsinotherregionsandremovedthelanguagebarriersincethetrainingcouldbeprovidedinThailanguage.
33
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
Based on the analysis, the key findings andobservationsareshownbelow.
• Six energy efficiency loan/credit programs are available in the market from 4 major banks, namelyKbank,BangkokBank,KTBandCIMB.
• Most of the banks do not usually consider financingofenergyefficiencyprojectsasproject finance. It is commonly considered as corporate finance, which increases the bank’s transaction cost and require more information from the projects’ owner.
• Most of the banks pay attention to the Ability to Repay Ratio especially DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio), which is calculated from a corporatecashflow,notaprojectcashflow.
• Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return(IRR),whicharefrequentlyusedtoevaluate the energy efficiency project at the plant level, are not used by banks as a direct consideration of repayment capacity.
• Fromthebanks’pointsofview, theobstruction of energy efficiency credit growth in Thailand liesonthedemandside,which implies that the project owners have less interest in investment comparedtothesupplyside,sincethebanksare ready to provide the energy credit for their current customers.
2.6Enhancing the Capacityof Financial Institutionsand Banks
Toenhancetheindustrialenergyefficiencyfinancing capacity, the project started with the study ofexisting project evaluation criteria used by themajorbanksinThailand,theassessmentoftrainingneeds for both bank’s personnel and factorypersonnel, and the design and development oftrainingcoursestosuittheirneeds.
2.6.1 Study ofExisting Project Evaluation Criteria
The study of existing project evaluation criteriaaimed to understand the bank’s perspectives andcriteria used to evaluate energy efficiency projectswhen factories submit their loan requests. DEDEandtheprojectagreedtohireaThaiconsultantfirmtostudythistopic.Thestudyprocess includedthereviewoflocalbank’scriteriaandpracticesusedinthe financial industry, and interview with the bank’s representatives. The representatives of 13relatedcommercialbanksandspecializedfinancialinstitutions were interviewed consisting of:
1 BankofAyudhaya(BAY)
2 CIMBThai(CIMB)
3 Export-ImportBankofThailand(EXIM)
4 GovernmentSavingBank(GSB)
5 IslamicBankofThailand(IBank)
6 KasikornBank(Kbank)
7 KrungThaiBank(KTB)
8 SiamCommercialBank(SCB)
9 SmallandMediumEnterpriseDevelopment BankofThailand(SMEBank)
10 ThaiInvestmentandSecuritiesCompany Limited(TISCO)
11 ThaiMilitaryBank(TMB)
12 ThanachatBank(Tbank)
13 UnitedOverseasBank(Thai)(UOB)
34
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.6.2 Training on FinancialEvaluation of Industrial EnergyEfficiency Project for Banks
The training on financial evaluation of industrialenergy efficiency project for banks was designedto familiarize the banks’ personnel to the basicindustrial utility systems and the common energyefficiency projects. The 2-day training consists ofin-classtrainingonday1andthevisittotheEnergyConservationBuildinginHonourofHisMajestytheKingforon-sitelearningonday2.Thetrainingforfinancial institutes were organized 2 times during26-27February2015and26-27March2015with34participants,13femaleand21male,from9banks.Theparticipatingbanksincluded:
1 Bangkok Bank
2 BankofAyudhaya
3 CIMBThai
4 EXIMBank
5 IslamicBankofThailand
6 SME Bank
7 TMB Bank
8 ThanachartBank
9 TISCOBank
Itwasfoundthatthebankshavetheirownprocessand criteria, which the project was unable tochange. Therefore, the consultant proposed keyrecommendations for reducing the credit processconstraintsasdescribedbelow.
1 Capacity building: Provide training courses designedonEEcharacteristics.Itmightpossible toincreasethebanks’potentialcapacitytocredit consideration by changing their perception fromCorporateFinancetoProjectFinance.
2 Credit product development: Provide EE credit with key features to motivate the owners to investmoreintensivelyinenergyprojects.
3 Overall credit consideration: Work with the banks to change their mindset to regard EE project loan requests as project finance,which takes less time in the credit consideration process. (The implementation of this direct recommendation is very difficult and depends onthebank’spolicy.)
4 Support from government organizations and energy network agencies:Cooperatewithenergy agencies and institutions to provide a capacity buildingprogram;providesoftloanforfinancial institutions similar to Energy Revolving Fund; provide the verification process of ESCO’s result; and request the cooperation to adjust thecreditriskreservemeasuresforEEprojects.
For the industry, the key recommendations forstrengtheningthepotentialtoaccessthecreditbythefactory’sownersaredescribedbelow.
1 Proposal preparation: Consider changing the outlinefromstrategicbusinessplantofeasibility studyoftheproject,whichwouldbepreferable tothebanksduetoshortandprecisecontent.
2 Financial projection preparation: Prepare financial projection proposals to the banks. Although the projection could be concise and pertinent, the preparation requires data from varioussources,whichcanaffectitscredibility.
3 Costbenefitevaluationoftheproject: Preparing feasibility study of the EE projects,whichwill enhancethereliability.
4 Support from government organizations and network: Arrange awareness raising activities fortheowners;andprovidebudgettemplatefor development of proposal preparation, financial projection and decision- making in equipment selection
35
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.7Closing the Loopwith Training for otherrelevant stakeholders
The original project design aimed at building thecapacity of the key players in energy efficiency,namely,enterprisemanagersandpersonnel,energyexperts and consultants and financial institutions.Additionally, equipment vendors and suppliers,as well as those providing support for technicalequipmentat the factory level,werealso includedasrelevantstakeholders.However,overthecourseof the project several further stakeholders weredeemedtoberelevant,namelythecertificationandaccreditationbodies (CB andAB) aswell asESCOcompanies. Therefore, the project developed twonew trainings for CBs and ABs, and incorporatedESCOsinthevendortraining.
TheEnMSimplementationhasbeenwidelyadoptedin Thailand, especially amongst large companies.However, theproject foundthat therewas limitedtechnicalknowledgeamongtheauditors.Therefore,the project carried out a two-day, technically-orientedCBtraining,(tobeprovidedtotheauditors),and one-day AB training to support TISI’s office.he breakdown of the participants of both the CBandABtrainingisshownbelow.
• 1st CB Training (19-20May 2014): A total of 39 participants attended, of which 17 were female and 22 male. 25 of the 39 participants were representatives of 12 CBs, and 14 participants wereTISI’sofficers.
• 2ndCBTraining(01-02September2015):Atotalof 37participantsattended,ofwhich13werefemale and 24 male. 32 of the 37 participants were representativesof14CBs,and5participantswere TISI’sofficers.
• AB training (03 September 2015): A total of 19 participants attended, of which 8 were female and11male.15ofthe19participantswereTISI’s officersand4participantswereDEDE’sofficers.
The original vendor training was designed as a½-dayoverviewofsystemsoptimization.Followingthe completion of the first SO vendor training,participants expressed interest for additional,technical-based training in SO. As a result, theprojectredesignedthevendortrainingtoa1½-daytraining using consisting of a curriculum thatincluded relevant aspects from both user- andexpert-level training materials. A two-hour brain-storming session was added to the second day’safternoon to facilitate discussions on the types ofsupporttheprojectcouldprovidesoastostimulateEEimplementationinThailand.Finally,inordertoengage more relevant market players, the projectexpanded to include both energy system designcompanies and ESCOs.
A total of 60 enterprises - consisting of vendors,suppliers, energy system design companies andESCOs–sentrepresentativestoattendthevendortraining (23forSSO,10forCASO,14forPSOand13forFSO).ThedetailedbreakdownofeachvendortrainingisshowninTable2.2.
36
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
Table 2.2 Breakdown of vendor training
Following the various training sessions conducted, the participants provided the following comments andsuggestions in their feedback:
• TheprojectshouldinvitethesteamsystemmanufacturerandthefuelsuppliertoattendtheSSO-related traininggiventhattheytooareinvolvedininfluencingtheenergyusageofsteamsystems;
• Thesuccessstoriesandcasestudiesshouldbedisseminatedacrosstheindustrialsectorforpromotional purposes;
• AdditionalSSATtrainingintheformofworkshopsshouldbeprovidedtoenhancetheparticipants’ understandingandconfidenceinusingthesoftware;
• Theadvanced-level,technically-orientedtrainingcourse,ratherthanthesimplifieduser-levelcourse, shouldbeprovidedtovendorsandsupplierssoastoincreasetheircapacityinandtechnical understandingofthesystemsapproach;
• Althoughtheinitialcostofequipmentislow,incomparisontothecostofenergyinthelongterm, itisfrequentlythemostimportantfactoraffectingthefactory’sdecisionwhenbuyingnewequipment. Therefore,thelife-cyclecostapproachshouldbepromotedtoindustryasamoreappropriatemethod forevaluatingdifferenttypesofequipment;
• Theenergyperspectiveofsystemsoptimization(particularlywithrespecttofan,pumpandcompressed airsystems)hasnotbeensufficientlyemphasizedintheacademicsphere.Instead,itshouldbepromoted tobothuniversitiesaswellasotherrelevantacademicinstitutions;and
• Incorrectmeasurementsledtounreliabledataandconsequently,resultedininaccurateanalyses. Qualifiedexpertsthatareabletoprovideguidanceortraininginappropriatemeasurementtechniques mightbebeneficial.
No.No. of
participants
No. of
companies Female MaleDate System
Gender
1
2
3
4
5
20
34
26
29
21
130
2
2
3
7
1
15
18
32
23
22
20
115
29Aug14
13-14Nov14
9-10Sep15
1-2Feb16
23-24Feb16
Total
SSO
SSO
CASO
PSO
FSO
10
18
10
14
13
37
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.8Communication Channels for Peer-to-Peer Network
Theprojecthassetupseveralcommunicationchannelstofacilitatetheaccessibilityofprojectinformationandexchangeofenergyefficiencyexperienceandlessonslearned.Bothparticipantsaswellasotherstakeholderssuch as factory personnel registered for the peer-to-peer network and are currently able to access suchinformation.Thecommunicationchannels for thepeer-to-peernetworkconsistedofe-mailcommunications,thebasecampprogram,theprojectwebsiteandaFacebookpage.
2.8.1 E-mail
E-mail communicationwasused as one of thekey channels to disseminate information to theparticipantsregarding, among others, details of up-coming trainings and workshops, the publication of promotionaland educational projectmaterial, and technical support for EnMS implementation and SO assessment. Allparticipantsofallworkshopsandtrainingsconductedbytheprojectwereregisteredintheproject’smailinglistwhichconsistedofmorethan900individuale-mailaddresses.
2.8.2 Basecamp
Basecampisanonlineprojectmanagementtoolaccessiblevia internetbrowserorthroughaspecificmobileapplication(showninFigure2.4).Thecandidatesoftheexperttrainingprogramswereinvitedtojointhegroupand to shareanddiscuss informationwithothers inanonline forum.The international expertsweremadeavailabletoanswerthequestionsraisedbytheparticipants.Intotal,therewere159memberswith10basecampprojectscreatedbrokendownasfollows:2fortheEnMSexperttraining,2fortheSSOexperttraining,2fortheCASOexpert training, 2 for thePSO expert training, 1 for theFSOexpert training, and 1 for theSSOtechnicaltrainingdevelopment.311discussionswereinitiatedand421fileswereshared.
Figure 2.4 Basecamp for IEE Project
38
Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency
2.8.3 Social media
To support remote access of the project’s infor-mation, thePMUcreatedaprojectwebsite (www.ieeproject.com shown in Figure 2.5). The websitecontained information pertaining to EnMS, SO,financial evaluation, training, publications, and ameans of contacting the website administrators.The training webpage was used to advertise up-comingtrainingsandprovidedthemostup-to-datetrainingagendaaswell as relevant applications indownloadable format directly from the website.With respect to thepublicationswebpage, variousmaterials, such as the SSAT application in Thai,a project leaflet and a case study were publishedandavailablefordownloadonly,however,forusersregistered to thewebsite. Additionally, video clipsofvariousspeakerswerepostedonthehomepageincluding a video containing factory personnelsharing their successful experiences with EnMSimplementationandan internationalexpertbrieflydiscussing various aspects of systems optimization. Intotal,morethan240memberswereregisteredtotheprojectwebsite.
By2015,giventhewidespreaduseofFacebook inThailand, the project created a Facebook accounttitled“IEEProjectThailand”soastosharetheshortinformation with factory personnel as well as thegeneralpublic.TheFacebookpagewasalsousedforannouncingup-comingtrainingactivitiesaswellasotherprojectevents.AsnapshotofFacebookpageisshowninFigure2.6.
In addition to the project’s formal communicationchannels,someparticipantsalsocreatedtheirownindividual networks with other participants usingother tools, such as group in Line Application forparticipants who attended the EnMS experttraining sessions.
Figure 2.6 IEE Project Thailand - Facebook Account
Figure 2.5 IEE Project website
2.9 Lessons Learned
The country context is very important especially for the technical knowledge transfer project like the IEEproject.SinceinThailand,theenergyefficiencyhasbeenpracticedandpromotedformorethantwodecades,the baseline situation and existing knowledge has to be considered and incorporated to the training ofemergingconceptspromotedintheprojectnamelyEnMSandSOtogether.TheadditionalvalueofEnMSandSOdifferent from theproject-based and component-based energy savingpractice is the keymessage to beemphasizedinallworkshopandtrainingcourses.
Thecontinuousimprovementisappliedintheproject.Thetraining’sfeedbackandupdatedindustry’ssituationwas analyzed to identify the improvement opportunities of the capacity building program. Therefore, newcoursesweredesignedtorespondtothenewtraining’sneeds.
39
Chapter 1Project Management
Chapter 3
Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization
40
Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization
Along with capacity build-ing, the implementation of EnMS and SO is one of the project’s key elements. This chapter reports on the results of the EnMS implementation and SO as-sessment in the factories receiving technical support from the project. To mon-itor the impacts of the capacity building program, the project tracked both actual implementation of projects as well as the number of experts quali-fied by companies and the services they provide to industries for the factories participating in the train-ing program.
41
Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System
and System Optimization
Figure 3.1 Participated factories with EnMs in-placed and with ISO 50001 certification
ISO 50001(25 Fac)
EnMS(25 Fac)
50 factories have completedEnMS implementations.
25 factories have certified ISO 50001.25 Factories have EnMS in place.
UnderExpert Training
TLC
Implementation support program
The factories got the supports from three channels.
ISO 50001(9 Fac)
ISO 50001(8 Fac)
ISO 50001(8 Fac)
EnMS(7 Fac)
EnMS(6 Fac)
EnMS(12 Fac)
3.1 EnMS Implementation in Participating Factories
Atthebeginningoftheprojectin2012,onlyafewcompaniesinThailandimplementedtheEnMSfollowingtheISO50001standard.Therefore,theprojectonlyprovideddirectsupporttoatotalof50factoriestherebyenablingthemtoconformtoISO50001.Therewerethreeapproachestosupportthefactories,namely:
1 Support through EnMS Expert Training: Anumberoffactorieswereselectedtobehostfacilitiesfor theEnMStraining.StaffrepresentativesweresenttoattendtheEnMSExpertTrainingtogetherwithother expertcandidateswhohavepreviouslyworkedinthefieldsofstandardizationandenergymanagement. The candidates and the factory’s representatives worked together to implement EnMS under the internationalexperts’supervision.
2 Support through the TLC project funded by TISI: TheTLCprojectwasinitiatedbyTISItosupport theindustriesimplementingISOstandards,includingISO9001,ISO14001andISO50001.TheTLCproject wasopenedforallindustriesandnotjusttargetedsectorsaswasthecaseintheIEEproject.Theconsultants workingontheTLCprojectvarieddependingonthebiddingresults.TISIinvitedconsultantstoparticipate intheEnMSExperttrainingandtoreceivequalificationsasNationalExperts.TheIEEprojectthenworked withtheNationalExpertsoftheTLCprojecttosupportindustriesbyusingconsultantsthathavereceived the expert-level training course. Since 2012, 40 companies received support through the TLC project; however,only14companieswerecountedundertheIEEproject.
3 EnMS implementation support program under the IEE project: TheEnMSNationalExperts, alongwithsupportfromtheproject,providedtheon-siteassistancetotheparticipatingfactories.Before joining thissupportprogram, the factorieshadtodemonstrate intentandcommit to implementing the recommendedEnMSmeasuresaswellasset-upateamtosupporttheNationalExperts.Theinternational experts visited the participating factories and were made available for further guidance to the NationalExperts,asneeded.
Intotal,76factoriesreceivedsupportfromTISIandtheproject,however,only50werecountedtowardstheproject’scontribution,basedontherespectivetargetsectorsaswellascriteriasetoutbythenationalexperts.Ofthese50,19camefromthefoodandbeveragessector,1fromthetextilesector,1fromthepulpandpapersector,10fromtherubberandplasticsector,13fromthechemicalssector,4fromthebasicmetalssector,and2 from the non-metals sector; all 50 participating factories successfully implemented EnMS measures asrecommended.25outof50factorieshavealreadyreceivedcertification inISO50001fromthecertificationbody.ThedetailsofparticipatingfactoriesaresummarizedinFigure3.1.Thefulllistofparticipatingfactoriesis in SessionF.1ofAnnexF.
42
Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization
3.2System OptimizationAssessment
In Thailand, energy saving projects have beenpromoted by several government agencies formany years.Most of those projects emphasized acomponent-based assessment and awareness-raisingactivitiesinfactories.Therefore,toillustratethe differences between the component-basedapproach typically used in the market and thesystemapproachpromotedbytheIEEproject,theDIP and IEE projects provided direct technicalsupport to conduct system optimization assessmentsin the targeted factories. The implemented energyefficiencymeasuresresultingfromtheassessmentswere tracked, for the most part, with some out-standing cases still to be published as case studies. There were four approaches to support thefactories:
1 Support through SO Expert-Level Train- ing: Targetedfactorieswereselectedtobehost facilitiesforthetrainingcourses.TheSOexpert- level training course was attended by the factorystaffaswellasbyotherexpertcandidates with previous experience in energy efficiency assessment. After finishing the training, the candidates and the factories’ representatives will conduct an independent or group assessment of the candidate plant under the internationalexperts’supervision.
2 Support through the TEM project funded by DIP: TheTEMprojectwasinitiated byDIPtosupporttheindustriesimplementing energysavingmeasures.TheTEMprojectwas open to all industries, not just the sectors targetedundertheIEEproject.Theconsultants workingwiththeTEMprojectvarieddepending on the bidding results. Some of TEM’s consultants successfully became National Experts following completion of the expert training. Since 2012, 364 companies received support from the TEMproject, however, only 26 companies were counted towards IEE project’s contribution.
3 SO implementation support program under the IEE project: The National SO Experts along with support from the project provided the on-site assistance to the participating factories. Before joining the support program, the factories had to demonstrate intent and commit to imple- menting the recommended SO measures as well as set-up a team to support the National Experts. The international experts visited the participating factories and were made available for further guidance to the NationalExperts,asneeded.
4 Support through the Biomass Boiler Study Program: To complement the optimization of steam systems, the project conducted a study aimed at improving and maintaining the efficiency of biomass boilers andtheirsteamsystems.Asapartofthestudy, the National SSO Experts, with the support from the project, carried out the assessments of 9 factories containing biomass boiler operations to identify opportunities for improvement. In addition to the assessment reports, the results of the study have been complied to create guidelines for the improvementinabiomassboileroperations.
The systems optimization assessment under theproject consisted of the assessment of steam,compressedair,pumping,andfansystems.Althoughthese systems are quite common in the targetedsectors, the factories showed greater interest inassessing the steam and compressed air systemsas opposed to the pump and fan systems. Underthe project, 76 system optimization assessmentswere carried out: 47 SSO, 22 CASO, 4 PSO and 3FSOassessments.
The breakdown of the assessments carried outin the project is shown in Figure 3.2. The list ofparticipating factories conducting systemsoptimization assessments is in Session F.3 ofAnnexF.
43
Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System
and System Optimization
To identify the actual level of implementation of SO improvements proposed in the assessment reports,the project conducted a survey of all host facilities and candidate plants. The results showed that 74 SOimprovements were implemented. The list of implementedmeasures is shown in Session F.3 in Annex F.The total electricity saving is 13,862MWh/year, total fuel saving is 226,939 GJ/year. The calculated CO2reductionis21,897kgCO2/year.
Figure 3.2 System optimization assessment conducted through the project’s support
SSO47
SSO,18
SSO17
SSO12
CaSO22
CaSO,11
CaSO7
CaSO4
PSO4
PSO2
PSO2
FSO3
FSO3
In total, 76 systemoptimization assessments
carried out.
UnderExpert Training
TEM
Implementation support
44
Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization
3.3Implementation Impactsof EnMS Capacity Building
In addition to tracking results from the project’sdirect support activities with regards to theimplementation of operational improvements,the project also tracked results of enterprisesparticipating in the energymanagement trainings.The project conducted a survey by sending thequestionnaires to the participants of the two-dayEnMS user-level training, and following up bye-mailandphonecall.However,someparticipantsmoved to new organizations not the project’stargeted sectors. There were also some factories reported back that they have completed the energy management plan without stating the measures implemented.Consequently, the impacts of the training provided by the project can be grouped into two categories: the general impacts andthespecificimpactscountedforproject’starget.
Therefore, 200 factories successfully implementedthe EE improvements as stated in their EnergyManagement Plan. The list of factories and themeasures implemented is shown inSessionF.2 ofAnnexF.
3.4Implementation Impactsof SO Capacity Building
The project conducted a survey for SO imple-mentation by sending the questionnaires to theparticipants of the two-daySOuser-level training,and following up by e-mail and phone call. Thesimilar problems faced during the EnMP trackingwere found including of the organization’s changeof trained personnel. Some factories also replied back theirapplicationof trainingcontentswithoutidentifyingthemeasuresimplemented.115factorieshave returned the questionnaire; however, 39factories have partly reported their savings intheEnMPtracking.Aftereliminate the redundantmeasures,only105measuresfrom43factorieswerecounted for the impacts of SO capacity building.ThelistoffactoriesandthemeasuresimplementedisshowninSessionF.4ofAnnexF.
3.5Lessons Learned
The demonstration of implementing project is oneofthecriticalapproachestomobilizetheemergingconcepts like EnMS and SO. The implementationresultscanbepresentedascasestudiestoconvinceotherfactoriestoimplementtheEnMSandSO.
Thetrackingofproject’simpacttotheparticipatingfactoriesisdifficultandtimeconsuming.Thereareseveraluncontrolledfactorssuchastheresignationof personnel attending training, the change ofpositionwithnolongerinchargeofenergyrelatedproject,andthechangeoffactory’spolicy.Anotherissue is the timing of following-up. Since it takestime to implement the energyefficiencymeasuresespeciallywiththemediumtohighinvestment,thetooearlyfollowingupmaynotprovideanyresults,whilethetoolatefollowingupmayfacethehigherrisksofuncontrolledfactors.
45
Chapter 1Project Management
Chapter 4
Project Sustainability
46
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
The sustainability of the project’s impact is one of the major focuses of the project. Some activities were included already in the design phase to ensure the sustainability beyondthe project’s duration, whereas other activitieswere initiated during theproject implementationphase. This chapter willdescribe the knowledge- sharing approaches de-ployed consisting of the promotion of videos, case studies and fact sheets, self-learning platform, in-tegration into universities’ curriculum, and the training materials. The replication of EnMS and SO due to the project’s contribution will also be discussed in terms of sustainability enhancement.
47
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
4.1Knowledge Sharing
During the project implementation, knowledgehavebeengathered,managedandshared throughvarious channels such as workshops, trainings,event booths, leaflet, website and Facebook page.However, these activities would no longer beavailable after the project closure. Therefore, theproject has prepared several knowledge-sharingapproaches to continue reaching out to targetgroups and other potential players in the future.These approaches consisted of producingpromotion videos, preparing case studies and factsheets, creating e-learning platform for somecourses, integrating the EnMS and SSO into theuniversities’ curriculum, and making the trainingcoursesavailablefortheengineeringinstitutions.
4.1.1 Promotion Video
ThepromotionvideoaimedtoconveythemessagesfromthemanagementofDIPandTISIaswellasthemanagement of participating factories about theimportanceofenergyefficiencyinindustryandthesuccess stories from the implementation of EnMSand SO. The project achievements including thenumber of participating factories were presented toconvince other factories to implement EnMS andSO in their own factories. There are three sets ofvideosasdescribedbelow.
VideoNo.1Benefitsofenergyefficiencyandthe • project’sachievement • IntroductionbyDGofDIP • Project’s components •Benefitsofenergyefficiencyintheindustrial sectorandthecooperationbetweenDIPand theprojectbyDGofDIP •BenefitsofISO50001implementationand thecooperationbetweenTISIandtheproject bySGofTISI •Project’sachievements • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofEasterPolypackCo.,Ltd. • Success story by Managing Director ofAeroflexCo.,Ltd. • Contact information
Video No. 2 Concept of EnMS and the success of participating companies •BriefintroductionoftheIEEproject •WhatisISO50001? • PDCA • 6 key concepts of Energy Management System • Key concept 1: Management commitment •Keyconcept2:Significantenergyuses(SEUs) • Key concept 3: Energy performance indicators (EnPIs) •Keyconcept4:Improvementopportunity •Keyconcept5:Operationalcontrol • Key concept 6: Management review • Success story by Managing Director ofAeroflexCo.,Ltd. • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofEasterPolypackCo.,Ltd. • Contact information
Video No. 3 Concept of SO and the success ofparticipating companies •BriefintroductionoftheIEEproject •Whatissystemoptimization? • Steam system optimization • Pumping system optimization • Compressed air system optimization • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofBangkokIronandSteelWorksCo.,Ltd. •SuccessstorybyFactoryDirectorof F&NDairies(Thailand)Co.,Ltd. • Contact information
Duringtheprojectimplementation,thesetofvideoswaspostedon theproject’swebsiteandFacebookpage, and shown before the start of the trainingsand workshops. The videos can be used beyondthe project closure since most of the contentemphasizes the promotion of energy efficiency intheindustryandtheillustrationoftheconceptsofEnMSandSO.UNIDO can also use the videos inotherenergy-relatedGEFprojects.Thevideocouldbe given to the project’s partners and UNIDO’sRegionalOfficeinBangkokfortheirusage.
48
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
4.1.2 Disseminating Case Studies and Fact Sheets
One of the effectiveways to convince factories to implement energy efficiencymeasures is to show themthe evidence of successful implementation. Therefore, the project prepared 25 case studies on EnMS andSO implementation. Each case study illustrated the benefits of implementing either EnMS or SO, theirimplementationapproach,keysuccessfactors,andsavingsfromtheimplementation.Thelistofcasestudiesisshown inTable4.1. Inadditionto the improvementopportunities,whicharethecommonfocusarea, thespecialfocusedareasofeachcasearelistedinthetable.TheexamplesofcasestudiesareinFigure4.1 andthecopiesofeachcasestudycanbefoundinAnnexG.
Table 4.1 List of case studies
No. Factory Focused AreaSector Topic
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
CharoenPokphandFoods
SahaviriyaPlateMill
C.P. Rice
Aeroflex
EasternPolypack
Cerebos
Tong Siang
ThaiMMA
Kulwong
Innolatex
FuengFuAnant
BeerThip
ImprovementofEnPIsBenefitsImprovementmeasures
OperationalcontrolLessonslearned
Energy performance improvementPower of data
HowtoidentifySEUsP-D-C-AcycleChallenges
RegressionAnalysisTrainingBenefits
BenefitsObjectives,targets,actionplanMetricsOvercoming barriers
HumanangleofthesystemSEUsLifecyclecost
Management systemBarrierBenefit
SMEsData issues
KeepitsimpleAwareness raising programBenefits
Staff engagementEnergy awarenessInternalauditOpportunities for improvement
HowtoidentifySEUsP-D-C-AcycleOtherbenefits
Food
Basicmetal
Food
Rubber
Plastic
Food
Textiles
Chemical
Chemical
Rubber
Beverage
Beverage
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
EnMS
49
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
In addition to case studies, the project has prepared fact sheets about EnMS, SO and biomass boilerimprovement to provide a brief overview and information on those areas including their implementationbenefits.ThelistoffactsheetsisshowninTable4.2andthefactsheet’sdetailsareinAnnexG.
Table 4.2 List of fact sheet
No.
No.
Factory
Factsheet
Focused Area
Focused Area
Sector Topic
Topic
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
CharoenPokphandFoods
Aeroflex
EasternPolypack
UenoFineChemicalsIndustry
F&NDairies
Tong Siang
BangkokLab&Cosmetic
ThaiNipponRubberIndustry
FuengFuAnant
LeeFeedMill
ThaiUnionFrozenProducts
ChanCharoen
ApexPlastech
WhywouldyouimplementanEnMS?
Guidelinesforbiomassboiler’sefficiencyimprovement measures
CentralizedcompressedairsystemAutomaticcontrolinstallation
Insulationoffurnace
Compressedairleakage
Installationofnewboiler
Flashsteamrecovery
Fuelswitching
LEDreplacement
Energysourceswitching
Blowdownreduction
ExcessairreductionCombustionchambercleaning
Economizerinstallation
Pipeinsulation
Highefficiencyaircompressorreplacement
BenefitofEnMsimplementationSixkeyconcepts
FundamentalofcombustionBiomasstypesandcharacteristicsBoilerefficiencycalculationExampleofimprovementmeasures
Food
Rubber
Plastic
Food
Food
Textiles
Chemical
Rubber
Beverage
Food
Food
Plastic
Plastic
CASO
EnMS
CASO
SSO
SSO
SSO
EnMS
EnMS
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
CaSO
EnMS
SSO
50
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
4.1.3 Increasing the Accessibilityof Training by Using E-learning
Although the project cannot provide any in-classtrainingbeyond itsduration,factorypersonnelcankeep learning about energy management systemandfinancialevaluationofenergyefficiencyprojectby accessing the self-learning course. These self-learning courses are available in bothEnglish andThai. The explanation of each course is shownbelow.
Energy ManagementSystem Self-Learning Course
The objective of the EnMS self-learning course isto provide a step-by-step guidance to the factory personnelonhowtoestablishtheeffectiveenergy managementsystem.Thelengthofcourseisabout10 to 12 hours depended on the learner’s speed.Therearefivemodulesinthecourse;namelyintro-duction,plan,do,checkandact.Tobepractical,duringthe studying, the factory personnel can click thelinktotheEnMPtrackingprogramtorecordtheiractual activities such as announcement of energypolicyandassignmentofenergymanagementteam.
Financial Evaluation of EnergyEfficiency Project Self-Learning Course
There are two sessions in the financial evaluationof energy efficiency project self-learning course,one for industry and one for financial institutions.The course for industrywas designed towalk thefactory personnel through the basic financialanalysis, and also provide an overview of banks’creditunderwritingprocessand thebanks’projectproposal content requirements. For the course forfinancial institute, it was designed to provide thebasic information of industrial energy system andcommonutilities,theconceptoflifecyclecost,andtheenergysavingmeasurementandverification.
The self-learning courses can be accessed throughthe self-learning platform as shown in Figure 4.2.Thelearnercanselectbetweenthe“trainingcoursefor industrial sector” and the “training course forfinancialinstitutions”.
Therearesixchaptersfortheindustrialsector’strainingcourseandfivechaptersforthefinancialinstitution’strainingcourse.ThedetailsoftrainingcoursesareinSessionH.2ofAnnexH.
Theaudiencecanalsodownloadthefullguidelineinpdfandconnecttothereferencesourcesandrelevantwebsitesbyfollowingthelinkprovidedinthecomputerprogram.
Figure 4.2 Home screen of the financial evaluation of energy efficiency project self-learning course
51
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
4.1.4 Integrating EnMS and SSO into Universities’ Curriculum
Oneof thekeyqueries fromthemidtermreview ishowtosustain theknowledge-sharingafter theproject closure.TheprojectpartnersandUNIDOagreedthatintegratingEnMSandSOintouniversities’curriculumis oneoftheapproaches,whichisdoablewiththeexistingresources.Byconsideringthetimeandbudgetavailable, the project decided to prepare thematerial package for theEnMS and SSO course. To develop the course materials,theprojectfollowedtheprocessshowninFigure4.4,whichincludesfocusgroupmeeting,reviewof existingmaterials,questionnairesurvey,preparationofdraftmaterials, reviewby lecturers,andpreparation offinalmaterials.
4.1.5 Making the Training Courses Available to the Institutes
Inadditiontotheself-learningmaterialsanduniversitycourse,theprojectismakingthe2-dayusertrainingcourseavailableforthefactorypersonnelwhowanttolearnaboutEnMSandsystemoptimization.Therefore,theprojecthas revised theThaiversionof the2-dayuser trainingand theuserguidelinesandmade themavailabletotheinstitutes.However,aspartofqualityassurancepolicy,theinstituteshavetosendaformalrequesttoUNIDOforthepermissiontoarrangethetrainingcourses,whichcanonlybedeliveredbyUNIDO’snationaltrainers.
DetailonEnMSandSOcoursedesignisinAnnexH
DetailonSOcoursematerialsisinSessionI.2ofAnnexI.
EnMS Course Materials
Sincethecourseisdesignedforthe3rd and 4th yearundergraduatestudent,itassumesthatthestudenthasabackgroundontheenergy-relatedterminologyandbasic calculation skills. The studentmayhaveno direct experience in utility and productionprocesses, but should have some basic under-standingoftheseprocesses.DetailonEnMScoursematerialsisinSessionI.1ofAnnexI.
Thematerialpackagecontainsthefollowingitems: • InstructionofusingEnMScoursematerial •Syllabus •Presentationfor11weeks(inpptandinpdf) •Casestudypapermillanddatafileinexcel •Casestudykaolinplantanddatafileinexcel •Workshopsandassignment •25casestudiesfromIEEproject •EnMSinbriefflyer
Figure 4.4 Course material development process
SSO Course Materials
Theprojecthasreviewedandanalyzedthetrainingmaterials for theSSOuser training,SSO technicaltraining and SSO expert training. Based on thereview,theavailabletrainingmaterialsshouldcoverallaspectsofSSO.However,additionalcontentonthe system should be added to guide the non-experiencedstudents.
Thematerialpackagecontainsthefollowingitems: • InstructionofusingSSOcoursematerial •Syllabus •Presentationfor11weeks(inpptandinpdf) • Case study •Workshopsandassignment •SSSTexcelfile(inThai)
Focusgroup
meeting
Preparedraft course
materials
Reviewexisting
materials
Reviewby
lecturers
Questionnairesurvey
Preparecourse
materials(final)
52
Chapter 4Project Sustainability
4.2Project’s Contributionto Replication
Thenationalexpertswhoweretrainedandcertifiedintheprojectwillbeanimportantresourcefortheknowledgedissemination and replicationofEnMSand SO implementation. Most of the nationalexperts are the consultants in the field of energyaudit and ISO 14001. A few of them are factorypersonnel. According to the survey, about 35national experts have provided the trainings onEnMSand/orSOaftercertifiedasnationalexpert.It shouldbenoted that the factorypersonnelwhoare the national experts have actively transferredthe EnMS knowledge by providing almost 60internal trainings. They also supported the EnMSimplementation in their corporate, which resultedof 15 additional factories certified ISO 50001 andfourfactorieswithEnMSinplace.
Duringthesurveyofcontributiontoreplication,thePMUaskedforthelistoffactoriesthatthenationalexperts supported the EnMS/SO implementation.Based on the compiled list, the national expertsprovided the consultancy service or support to40factoriesforEnMSimplementation,52factoriesforSSOassessment,20factoriesforCaSOassessmentand two factories forPSOassessmentwithout theproject’s support.
Thesurveyresultsshowedthatthecertainnumberof national expertswere capable to deliver EnMSandSOtrainings,whichisimportantforknowledgedisseminationaftertheprojecttermination.
4.3Market Transformfor EnMS and SO
Atthebeginningoftheproject,EnMSin-linewithISO50001 standardwasanemerging concept forThailand. There was only one factory in ThailandwithISO50001certificationin2012.In2016,therewere 255 certificates of ISO 50001 in Thailandaccording to the survey conducted by ISO. TheprojecttogetherwithTISIandDEDE,IEEproject’spartners, have promoted the ISO 50001 imple-mentationforseveralyears.AlthoughtheISO50001is currentlywellknown toThai industry,TISIandDEDEwill continue their activities to support thefactoriestostandardizetheirEnMSimplementationtomeettheISO50001.
The74SOassessmentindependentlycarriedoutbythe national expertswithout the financial supportfrom the project reflected the adoption of SOconcept by the national experts. The backgroundof national experts is mixed. Most of them areconsultants,whilesomeofthemarelecturerswhoalsoprovide theconsultingservice.Manyof themarestillactive.Theykeepprovidingtheconsultingservices either directly to the industry or throughthe technical support projects funded by Thaigovernment.
The national expertswhowork in the universitieshave already incorporated the EnMS and SO intheir class. They help the project to cultivate theprinciplesofEnMSandSOtothestudentswhowillbe theengineerworking in the industryorbe theconsultantsupportingtheindustryinthefuture.
53
Chapter 1Project Management
Chapter 5
Project Monitoring
54
Chapter 5Project Monitoring
In addition to the regular monitoring by the Project Steering Committee, the project was also evaluatedby the independent evalua-tors according to the GEF’s requirements. In this chapter, the result of midterm evaluation is presented.
55
Chapter 5Project Monitoring
5.1Mid-term Evaluation
A mid-term evaluation was undertaken on-sitebetween11and16May2015,namely3yearsand2 months into the project. The internationalevaluator, Mr. Johannes Van den Akker and thenationalevaluator,Ms.ThareeKamuang,interviewedtheproject’skeypartnersandvisitedtwofactoriesparticipatingintheproject.
Theevaluatorsfoundthattheprogressmadeontheproject’soutputswassignificant,withmostplannedoutputsbeingachievedbythetimeofthemid-termreviewor on track to be completed by the end of2015.The industriesshowedstrong interest in theproject,particularlythelargerindustrialcompanies.Thedirectly relevant feedback from theevaluatorsandtheactionstakenbytheprojectaredescribedinthefollowingsections.
5.1.1 Institutionalization of training
Feedback from the review
OneaspectofsustainabilityistheinstitutionalizationoftheEnMSandSOtrainingcourses.Thetrainingsthemselves contain a wealth of information andall training materials and documents shouldbe transferred to DEDE’s Energy Training andLearningCenterwhich could simultaneously serveas a focal point for e-learning on EnMS- and SO-relatedissues.ThisissuewouldneedtobediscussedandagreeduponbytheProjectSteeringCommitteebeforeexecution.
In a country the size of Thailand and a marketconsisting of tens of thousands of small, mediumand large enterprises, the number of trainednational experts envisaged (about 80) and thenumberofcompaniestargeted(about200inEnMSand 50 in SO) is comparably small. Even if theproject could be up-scaled, it would only coverof small section of the vast number of companiesin the country.We suggest diverting someprojectresourcestothefollowing:a)integratingtheEnMSandSOinthecurriculumofrelevantundergraduateprograms of prominent universities and/or b)organizingshortintroductionandrefreshercoursesor seminars at relevant engineering or businesstraining institutes, or by relevant industry andprofessionalassociations.
Theformeroptionisenvisagedmoreforthemedium-term, while the latter option could probably beimplementedintheshortterm.Pilotingboththeseprogramsduring theproject’sdurationwouldbeadesirable(new)output.Itwassuggestedduringtheevaluationmission that recognition in the form ofanofficialUNIDOcertificatetothetrainednationalexpertsfortheirworkdoneincompanieswouldbeusefulfortheirprofessionalworkinthefuture.
Actions taken
Although the feedback from the evaluators wasuseful in termsof sustaining thecapacitybuildingprogram,theexistingsituationinThailandaswellasthelimitationsoftheprojectneedtobeaddressed.Currently, there aremany organizations (includinggovernment agencies, engineering institutes,certification bodies and consulting companies)providing the energy-related trainings to industry.These organizations have their own trainingmaterialsandtrainers.Inordertousetheproject’straining materials, the national trainers must bethe ones to deliver the training, thereby ensuringguaranteed quality. Consequently, it is difficultto force these organizations to adopt the UNIDOcourse and trainers. However, the project realizedthe usefulness of disseminating the knowledgegathered during the implementation phase. Theproject then decided to make the two-day user-leveltrainingpackageavailableforthegovernmentagenciesandengineeringinstitutes.However,theseorganizations have to submit a formal requestto UNIDO addressed to the HQ office in Vienna.Nevertheless,thetrainersmustbepartofthepoolofnational trainersorat leastbeapprovedby thenationaltrainersandUNIDO.
In the last year of the implementation phase, theproject developed two courses for undergraduatestudents and made course materials available forlecturerstousetheintheirclassrooms.Thedetailsrelating to thedevelopment of the course are laidout in section 4.1.4.
56
Chapter 5Project Monitoring
5.1.2 Post-project action plan
Feedback from the review
Towards the end of the project, the PMU willcommission a sound analysis of the situation,remainingbarriersandstepstobetakenthatensurethe policy-institutional, technical and financial-conomic sustainability of theProject in theperiodaftertheprojecthascometoanend.
The project document foresees the transfer of themaintenance of the peer-to-peer database andreportingtoolstotherelevantgovernmentagency.Thus, the institutionalization of the P2P networkshould be looked into, as well as the post-projectrole of existing industrial associations, chambersof commerce and industry and professional associations of engineers. The formation of aWorkingGroup (with representatives ofDIP, TISI, DIWandDEDE) isanimportantfirststeptowardsa post-project cooperation between these govern-ment entities. The post-project action plan shouldprovide some details on objectives, plans andactionstobetakenbytheWorkingGroup.
For example, the Working Group can play animportantroleinmakinginformationandknowledgeonSOandEnMSavailable throughvariousmeansincluding toolkits on CDs and in printed form aswell as web-based tools and info made availablethroughe-learningportal.Theequipmentprocuredunder the project and used during the audits andmeasurementsmustalsobedisposedofappropriately;itwassuggested to theevaluators that itcouldbeusedbytheDIPforfutureassistancetoSMEs.
These issuesshouldbeaddressed towards theendof the project by commissioning a sound ‘post-project action plan’. Such an ‘action plan’ shouldhave the following elements: a) overview chapteronstatusofEnMS,SOandEE,b)identificationofmitigated and outstanding barriers, c) conclusionand recommendations to the Government andprivate sector institutions for post-project suppor-tive actions.
Actions taken
Aftertheproject’scompletion,theinformationandknowledge on SO and EnMS was made availablethroughtheprojectwebsite,whichwillbeavailableforanother2years,aswellasinotherGEFprojectsin Thailand executed byUNIDO. TheCDs on self-learning were given to the project’s partners fordissemination.
Theequipmentusedduring theenergyaudits andmeasurements were transferred to DIP, DIW andDEDEforfutureusetosupportThaiindustry.
5.1.3 Finance
Feedback from the review
Itisnotexactlycleartowhatextentthereexistsaneed for external financing of industrial energyefficiencyimprovements(resultingfromEnMSandSOanalyses)evenregardinglargerinvestmentswitha largeenergyefficiency improvementcomponent. In this respect, SMIs could possibly be in more needoffinancetoundertakeEEimprovements.Itisrecommendedthatsurveysconductedamongstthetargeted (and potential) industries should includequestions on the financing needs and supportrequired. This information should feed into theabove-mentioned post-project action plan with a section on financing issues (if any) and options.Inthisrespect,itwouldbeusefultoaskquestionsto the company regarding fuel, power and corres-ponding monetary savings, as well as estimatedinvestment cost. This provides useful insightsregardingpaybackperiods aswell as theneed foradditionalfinancingtofundinvestments.
Actions taken
Theprojecthas incorporatedquestions targetedatthe financing needs of factories when organizingworkshops.However, limited information is sharedregarding the financing sources and the cost ofinvestment in EE improvements. Nevertheless, itis quite obvious that many factories are targetingDEDE’sfinancialsupportprogram.
5.1.4 Gender
Feedback from the review
Tomakethegenderdimensioninthevariousprojectactivities more pronounced, gender-disaggregatedindicators could be included in future companysurveys to be able to measure the contributionsoftheprojecttowardsgendermainstreaming.
Actions taken
Theprojecthas included thegenderdisaggregatedindicators in the survey of energy managementplanimplementation.
cover inside
2
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
content
3
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Annex A
Project Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
4
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.1 Project Management Structure
The implementation of all activities planned under the project will be supervised by DIP through the Project Steering Committee (PSC) as shown in Table a.1.
Table a.1 List of PSC’s members
Title Organization Role in PSC
Director General Department of Industrial Promotion Chairperson
Deputy Director General Department of Industrial Promotion Vice Chair no. 1
Deputy Secretary General Thai Industrial Standards Institute Vice Chair no. 2
Director of Division II of Sectorial Industries Development
Department of Industrial Promotion Member
Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial Works Member
Representative Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Member
Representative SME Development Bank Member
Representative CIMB Thai Member
Representative The Federation of Thai Industries Member
Representative Office of Industrial Economics Member
Project Manager UNIDO Member
National Project Coordinator UNIDO Secretary and Member
Since the PSC’s meeting was organized once a year, the PSC agreed to set up a Working Group (according to the decision made at the PSC meeting on 19 February 2014), which would be represented by the focal points of each government partners, to facilitate the management of the project and work closely with PMU as assigned by the PSC. The Working Group Members are listed in Table a.2.
Table a.2 List of Working Group members
Title Organization Role in WG
Director of Division II of Sectorial Industries Development
Department of Industrial Promotion Chairperson
Representative Thai Industrial Standards Institute Vice Chair
Representative Department of Industrial Works Member
Representative Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Member
Representative Department of Industrial Promotion Secretary and Member
National Project Coordinator UNIDO Secretary and Member
5
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.2 Key Decisions made by Project Steering Committee
Table a.3 Key decisions made by Project Steering Committee
PSC Meeting Key Decisions Actions
1st PSC meeting27 March 2012
The project would organize the inception workshop in June 2012.
Inception workshop was organized on 6 June 2012.
The project would invite the Minister of Industry to give the welcome speech in the inception workshop.
Minister of Industry gave the welcome speech in the inception workshop.
NPC would later send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.
Documents circulated
Deputy Secretary General of TISI, Mr. Virat, was nominated for Vice Chair of PSC by the committee.
The structure of PSC has been revised.
The committee unanimously approved The Federation of Thai Industries (F.T.I.) and industry Office of Industrial Economics to be additional committee.
The structure of PSC has been revised.
The work operation should be as follows. PMU would be the center of coordinator and TISI would be the leader of for ISO implementation. DEDE would be the leader in financing capacity. DIP and DIW would be responsible for SO implementation. The leader of each component would assign focal point and contact person for UNIDO in order to coordinate with each component.
Focal point of each agency has been assigned.
2nd PSC meeting14 May 2013
The PSC unanimously approved to add pulp and paper to be IEE project target industries.
PMU has added the pulp and pa-per in the target sector list.
3rd PSC meeting19 February 2014
The PSC has agreed to set up the working group to coordinate among the project’s partners.
DG of DIP as a chairperson of PSC has signed the order to set up the working group.
4th PSC meeting24 February 2015
The PSC approved that the working group would invite the committee to attend the midterm evaluation result presentation and then circulated draft result within the committee.
The midterm evaluation has been conducted during 12 to 15 May 2015. The evaluator presented the initial findings to the PSC on 15 May 2015. The draft and final version of evaluation report was circulated.
5th PSC meeting17 January 2017
The PSC unanimously approved to extend the project closing date to 28 February 2018.
The extension letter to UNIDO has been signed by the DG of DIP and sent to UNIDO on 8 May 2017.
The PSC approved to organize Case Study Awards and working group would discuss in details about the awards criteria.
The case study award competition has been carried out during 7 February to 10 April 2017.
The PSC approved to coordinate with representative from project partners on equipment transfer and allocation.
The project partners has agreed on the equipment allocation list.
6
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.3 Project Steering Committee Meeting 1/2012
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Venue: Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power
Presiding: Mr. Pasu Loharjun Director General Department of Industrial PromotionMembers Present: Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit Deputy Secretary-General Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mrs. Sirinthorn Vongsoasup Energy Efficiency Expert Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Mr. Prasong Norajit Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial
Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul First Vice President Commercial Banking Financial Analytics and Support Team, CIMB Thai
Mr. Tanit Onnuch Vice President Commercial Banking Service and Support Section CIMB Thai
Mr. Pornchai Jirasopon SME Bank
Mr. Chin-Pen Chua Representative and Director UNIDO Regional Office
Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO (IEE Project)
Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, UNIDO (IEE Project)
Observers Present: Mr. Vuttichai Tangam Director of Bureau of Target Industries Development Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Samakki Pocharoen Director of Energy and Environmental Development Division Department of Industrial Promotion
Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Senior Industrial Technical Officer Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Aditad Vasinonta Industrial Technical Officer Department of Industrial Promotion
7
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Observers Present: Mrs. Sompit Naennar Public Sector Development Officer Department of Industrial Promotion
Miss Angsana Somabha Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Noppadol Janya-Adisai Dissemination Technical Officer Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Standard Officer Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mrs. Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics
Mr. Sarun Panyatham Manager Commercial Banking Service and Support Section CIMB Thai
Mr. Chanin Nidhiprabha SME Bank
Mrs. Sooksiri Chamsuk Programme Officer UNIDO Regional Office
Miss Kulsiri Sakprasith Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Miss Atchareeya Pongput Project Administrative Assistant UNIDO (IEE Project)
Absent: Mr. Supakit Boonsri Department of Industrial Works Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Pasu Loharjun, Chairperson, at 9:30 a.m.
8
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Session 1 Committee’s Report:
Mr. Pasu, Chairperson, reported to the meeting that on March 6, 2012 the Council of Ministers unanimously approved the joint project between Ministry of Industry, Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency of Ministry of Energy and UNIDO under the coordination of Department of Industrial Promotion to implement the Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE). He also informed that there were several comments from Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board that the project should concern the involvement of SMEs, and clearly specify indicators, results and effects in terms of quantity and quality. The monitoring and evaluation should also proceed continuously.
Session 2 Information:
Mr. Sanjaya, Project Manager, introduced the overview and concept of the Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE). He started with the history of the project, the barriers to industrial energy efficiency, the project objective and financial plan. The detailed document was attached in Appendix 1.
Ms. Uma, National Project Coordinator, then described the IEE project work plan, project activities, project management and implementation in 2012. The project objectives were to promote industrial energy efficiency through ISO 50001 energy management standards and system optimization. The project activities were divided into 4 components consisting of 1) ISO Compliant Management Systems, 2) Industrial Energy Systems Optimization, 3) Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity, and 4) Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects. Please find details enclosed in Appendix 2.
Session 3 Consideration Issues:
Session 3.1 Discussion of project activities, work plan and budgeting
Ms. Sirinthorn offered the training venue of Bureau of Human Resource Development of DEDE, which is located in Klong Ha area, for Energy Systems Optimization training. Mr. Sanjaya confirmed that the project would share the training documents to all project partners and the committee could give some comments before it would be translated.
Mr. Virat submitted a question why there was no working group chart in the presentation and how the working structure of the project would be. He also inquired if the projects had drawn any working structure. Ms. Uma responded that the current management chart was approved by GEF and initially there was no working group in the working structure, but after meeting with the related organizations, there was an idea of establishing working groups to coordinate with project management unit. Ms. Sirinthorn commented that it was necessary to have working group for each activity because the PMU would focus on overall activity and the PSC would be too large to proceed the activities.
Ms. Rachada questioned whether the timeline for management workshop in August 2012 would be too late to organize other activities or not. Ms. Uma explained that the management workshop would be held after the inception workshop, which would be organized in June, and the project had to wait for confirmation from international experts. However, the project would consider the date for management workshop again. Mr. Pasu submitted the question why the inception workshop would be held in June. Ms. Uma replied that there were many holidays during April and May therefore in order to avoid the delay in sending out the invitation letters to the factories and managing the workshop venue during the holidays, the workshop initially was planned to be held in June.
Mr. Prasong commented that the project had to demonstrate the clear goal and the expected outcome of the project. He also expressed that he was not sure if four selected systems for system optimization would be enough for basic metal industry, especially for SMEs smelting factories which normally did not have boiler, pumping, and fan systems. He shared his experience from the project with small aluminum and steel smelting factories that if the project had not focused on the furnace system, it would not have been possible to receive the clear result on energy saving. He also was concerned that whether ESO national experts had to sign an agreement
9
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
after receiving the training and how to recruit the candidate that can work for the project with long term. Mr. Pasu asked if there is any possibility to show outcome of the project. Mr. Sanjaya agreed that the system optimization might not be a measure for basic metal industry but for some of metal industry such as steel industry, he believed that there was an opportunity to improve pumping system. He mentioned that it was not necessary to improve every system in every industry. The project could select the available industry. He also explained that improving in furnace design or typical component level is not in the scope of the project. Regarding the training, he thought that it might be one month before or after August as it was summer time in Europe therefore it was difficult to find an expert to work in summer. Therefore he recommended not to fix the date yet. Ms. Uma confirmed to send the project documents which stated the output and outcome of the project to the committee. She also emphasized that it was necessary to have the agreement with the national experts. She mentioned that if the PSC could recommend the potential consultants so that they could maintain the long-term relationship with the government agency after the project terminated. Mr. Prasong shared his experience from the previous project which had also debate on whether or not to issue the certificate for the successful trainees. However, in that project the committee decides not to issue the certificate.
Mr. Vutthichai mentioned that Department of Industrial Promotion also had Total Energy Management Project (TEM) which was similar to IEE. That project had a clear goal to annually reduce 5% energy but practically it could reduce upto 5-10%. He suggested that IEE had to set the clear objective and make the project different from TEM. He also expressed that he was not worried about consultant training because he had been informed from the consultant firms that the professional energy experts were still in demand. Mr. Sanjaya explained that IEE also targeted on the improvement of factories supported by TEM to save more energy. He explained that IEE had the different system from energy management in Thailand. Ms. Sooksiri clarified that both project had the same goal and objective. However, she ensured that IEE would work closely with TEM and if the factories supported by TEM applied the use of ESO then it would be more helpful to save more energy.
Ms. Sirinthorn suggested that the objective of the ESO implementation was to improve the energy saving in the common operating system so that the project could magnify the project outcomes to other unselected industrial sectors. However, since the project had selected four operating systems in six industrial sectors, but each industrial sector had specific machines and equipments. The project should also provide some recommendation or guideline on those specific machines; therefore the factories would be able to improve the system beside those four selected systems. Mr. Sanjaya answered that those industrial sectors were selected based on the survey results. If some industries would be interested in joining the project then the project could make the decision later and the project might use the same training material to support them.
Ms. Angsana asked whether the national experts and the factories could participate both ISO and ESO components. Ms. Uma answered that the factories can join both components but the national experts could not involve in both components because the project had planned to train 50 experts for each component. Also, the selection criteria of these two groups of expert were different. The experts on ESO would require the technical background while the experts on ISO Management System would require more general management knowledge.
Ms. Uma asked for the advice for the pattern of activity in inception workshop, the protocol and who the speaker would be. Mr. Sanjaya shared some experience in inception workshop in Philippines and Vietnam that it had been held to promote the project. They had invited Secretary, who is the Minister in Thai system, or Deputy Secretary to be the speaker. Ms. Sirinthorn suggested that the speaker should be Minister of Industry or Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry. She also recommended that beside six selected industries, the project should invite other potential industries, SMEs, other government agencies that could support the project, energy consultants and the universities that could promote the knowledge from the project. Mr. Pasu said that it was possible that Minister of Industry would be the speaker otherwise Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry would be assigned by the Minister. Ms. Uma would find the workshop venue and propose to the PSC later.
Ms. Uma also confirmed to send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.
Ms. Sirinthorn said that DEDE was pleased to promote the project and offered that if the customer needed to invest in the replacement, then DEDE could support.
10
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Decision
3.1.1 The project would organize the inception workshop in June 2012.
3.1.2 The project would invite the Minister of Industry to give the welcome speech in the inception workshop. However, if the Minister would not be available, normally he would assign the Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry to present on behalf of the Minister. The choice of workshop venue would be proposed to the PSC later.
3.1.3 Ms. Uma would later send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.
Session 3.2: Discussion of project structure
Mr. Pasu recommended Mr. Virat to be Vice Chair of PSC. Mr. Sanjaya shared the experience that in other countries the additional members of PSC were from academic or universities to discuss particular issue. Those were not full time members of the committee on an ad hoc basis but they would receive some benefits from this involvement. The full time members could be from industry association but if they would not attend the activities strongly, those members could likely to fail as the members because the committee needed to encourage the association to involve in the PSC. However, the committee could decide which association would be invited.
Mr. Pasu recommended that the project should invite the organization in industrial field that could coordinate the project to be additional committee, for example, The Federal of Thai Industries (F.T.I) and Office of Industrial Economics. Mr. Chua proposed Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion (OSMEP) but Mr. Pasu commented that now the Ministry tried to adjust the role of OSMEP to focus on the policy for SMEs so it was not related to the project directly.
Ms. Uma explained that there were 3 working components which consisted of ISO, ESO and Financing capacity. The leader of each component could set the working group and coordinated PMU then PMU would report to PSC with the conference proceedings. Ms. Sirinthorn inquired whether UNIDO could be the center of PMU and DEDE would support and coordinate in each activities and Mr. Pasu suggested that UNIDO would be the administrative support. Mr. Sanjaya proposed that each department could send the relevant expert to work within PMU. Once the project terminated, those people could continue provide support to the department. Ms. Uma clarified that the idea of establishing working group was to motivate other organizations that were not the core partner of the project to join the activities. However, the working group could be formal or informal. Mr. Virat also suggested forming the informal working group.
Decision
3.2.1 Mr. Virat was nominated for Vice Chair of PSC by the committee.
3.2.2 The committee unanimously approved F.T.I and industry Office of Industrial Economics to be additional committee.
3.2.3 The committee had come together to form the informal working group. PMU would be the center of coordinator and TISI would be the leader of for ISO implementation. DEDE would be the leader in financing capacity. DIP and DIW would be responsible for ESO implementation. The leader of each component would assign focal point and contact person for UNIDO in order to coordinate with each component.
Announcement: The next meeting will be in September or October. It will include the presentation of inception workshop report.
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m.
11
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.4 Project Steering Committee Meeting 2/2013
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Venue: Function Room, Vie Hotel Bangkok
Presiding: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion
Members Present: Mr. Surayuth Boonmatat Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Mr. Tanit Onnuch CIMB Thai
Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha UNIDO
Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai IEE Project
Observers Present: Mr. Thanate Makelai Department of Industrial Promotion
Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mrs. Siripen Kusalanon Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Noppadol Janya-Adisai Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mrs. Ruangporn Thanyasiri Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Sarun Panyatham CIMB Thai
Mr. Nutthaklit Nidhiprabha Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand
Mrs. Sooksiri Chamsuk UNIDO
Miss Atchareeya Pongput IEE Project
12
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Absent: Mr. Prasong Norajit Department of Industrial Works
Miss Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics
Representative from Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand
Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, in Function Room in Vie Hotel Bangkok. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas, Chairperson, at 9:30 a.m.
Session 1 Committee’s Report:
Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas informed that Mr. Sophon Pholprasit, Chairperson, had occupied by government duty therefore he was authorized to be in charge as Chairperson. Mr. Kobchai requested for approval to be in charge as chairperson in case Mr. Sophon could not preside over the meeting.
Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit authorized Surayuth Boonmatat to act as Vice Chair of Project Steering Committee. Mr. Kobchai requested for approval to be in charge as chairperson in case Mr. Sophon could not preside over the meeting.
The Committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.
Session 2 Secretary’s Report:
The minutes of the March 27, 2012, meeting was approved as read.
Session 3 Information:
Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2012 as follow: - Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Inception Workshop on June 6, 2012 with 146 participants - Energy Management System Awareness Workshop on July 10 and September 10, 2012 with total 151 participants - Energy Management System User Training on July 12-13, September 3-4, 2012 and February 18-19, 2013 with total 256 participants - Steam System Optimization User Training - Pumping System Optimization User Training - Compressed Air System Optimization User Training - Energy Management System National Expert Training - Thai Experts would be trained how to implement and write report from International Experts - Equipment Procurement for Industrial Energy Systems Optimization - Thai Experts would use equipment to evaluate energy efficiency of candidate plants.
IEE Project would report the progress of project activities every 3 along with UNIDO activities progress report to Office of Industrial Economics
In 2013, IEE would open the bidding to seek organizer to arrange Energy Management System Awareness Workshop in order to guarantee the invitation of management level participants.
Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity would be commenced in the 3rd quarter of 2013. DEDE would lead this component.
13
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Mr. Kobchai suggested to repeat the activities therefore IEE Project would know the factories needs. Mr. Surayuth Boonmatat expressed that the project activities should respond to the factories benefits.
Mr. Sanjaya commented that normally the project would give an evaluation to the training participants therefore the project could improve the next trainings.
Session 4 Consideration Issues:
Ms. Uma discussed about co-finance and recommended that the co-finance could be in in-kind such as printing materials, training venues including training promotion. Ms. Uma also asked for the advice how to record and report the co-finance activities.
Mr. Kobchai suggested that the project could use the meeting rooms in DIP Office in Rama 4 to organize the trainings and DIP had already changed the air condition closing time to opening hours
Mr. Sanjaya commented that Thai experts would receive intensive training by International experts. They would be trained through a training session and on-site process. Each expert would also consult and access support from international experts. They also had to pass the exam in order to be registered as National Experts
Mr. Kobchai also suggested that IEE project should request the training activities plan from DIP so the project could plan to promote the project activities with DIP’s activities. The project also could plan the activities for the next year and Mr. Kobchai would sign for it so the project could coordinate with other departments in order to promote the activities.
Mr. Thaned suggested that The Institute of Industrial Energy of The Federation of Thai Industries would hold the energy symposium on August 8, 2013 and he would suggest to put IEE project activities in the agenda.
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion for adding pulp and paper in the targeted industries of the project. Mr. Kobchai suggested to add ethanol and pulp and paper.
The meeting unanimously approved to add pulp and paper to be IEE project targeted industries.
Session 5 Other Issues:
Mr. Kobchai suggested that the PSC committee should be listed by position name therefore the chairperson could authorize any delegate to be in charge as chairperson for the efficiency of the PSC working.
The Committee unanimously approved that the project and DIP should form the list formal PSC committee
Announcement: The next meeting will be held in 2014
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
14
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.5 Project Steering Committee Meeting 3/2014
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Venue: Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power
Presiding: Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion
Members Present: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Thanate Makelai Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Prasong Norajit Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial Works
Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Engineer, Experienced Level Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Miss Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics
Mr. Chalerm Sampanthanaruk The Federation of Thai Industries
Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul CIMB Thai
Miss Nanthawan Janprateep Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand
Mr. Chin-Pen Chua Representative and Director UNIDO Regional Office
Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO
Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, IEE Project
Observers Present: Mr. Aditad Vasinonta Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Samakki Pocjaroen Department of Industrial Promotion
Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Department of Industrial Promotion
15
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Observers Present: Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion
Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Sarun Panyatham CIMB Thai
Miss Atchareeya Pongput IEE Project
Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Wednesday, February 19, 2014, in Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, at 10:00 a.m.
Session 1 Committee’s Report:
Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, would be occupied by government duty therefore she would authorize Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas to be in charge as Chairperson
The committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.
Session 2 Secretary’s Report:
The minutes of the May 14, 2013, meeting was approved as read.
Session 3 Old Business:
Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, informed that according to Project Steering Committee meeting on May 14, 2013, the committee unanimously approved to form formal Project Steering Committee in order to support and monitor project activities. Reference letter No.168/2555, creation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Steering Committee.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Session 4 Consideration Issues:
Ms. Uma informed that in 2014, the project would arrange project activities as per project core components.
Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project were expected to start in June 2014.
Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity would be commenced by developing documents on Evaluation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project and organizing training.
16
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Session 5 Information:
Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2013 as follow:
ISMED was selected to be organizer to arrange Energy System Management Workshop. The workshops were held follow: - September 25, 2013 in Bangkok, November 16, 2013 in Nakorn Ratchasrima, November 20, 2013 in Kanchanaburi and November, 27 2013 in Rayong with total 352 participants. 258 participants from 133 factories were from targeted industries.
Coordinated with TISI to arrange Energy Management User Training. The trainings were held as follow: - February 18-19, 2013 in Bangkok, June 3-4, 2013 in Cholburi and September 26-27, 2013 in Bangkok with total 172 participants 138 participants from 68 factories were from targeted industries.
Energy System Optimization National Expert Training Module 2 and 3 on February 20-22 and June 5-7, 2013 with 8 government personnel, 22 National Expert Candidates and 7 host factory representatives
Coordinated with DIP to arrange System Optimization User Trainings. The trainings were held as follow: - March 18-19 and May 20-21, 2013 Pumping System Optimization - April 22-23, 2013 Steam System Optimization - June 17-18, 2013 Compressed Air System Optimization - Total 227 participants were trained from System Optimization Trainings. 166 participants from 71 factories were from targeted industries - Steam System Optimization National Expert Training on April 24-26, 2013 with 1 government personnel, 18 National Expert Candidates and 18 host factory/candidate plant representatives - Pumping System Optimization National Expert Training on May 14-17, 2013 with 3 government personnel, 14 National Expert Candidates and 3 host factory/candidate plant representatives - Compressed Air System Optimization National Expert Training on June 11-14, 2013 with 3 government personnel, 15 National Expert Candidates and 7 host factory/candidate plant representatives
Mr. Kobchai commented that PMU should demonstrate energy saving result of host facility/candidate plant before and after participating the project and also the training evaluations. Ms. Uma informed that PMU would start monitoring host facility/candidate plant implementation results in 2014
Mr. Sanjaya informed that there would be internal audit in the 3rd - 4th quarter of 2014 in order to monitor the progression of the project activities and financial cooperation.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
17
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Session 6 Other Issues:
Adding targeted industries
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion for adding targeted industries in the project. Mr. Sanjaya suggested that the project could add more targeted industries by creation working group to consider the studies and the reason and propose to the committee.
The committee unanimously approved that the project could add more targeted industries but should form the working group to consider the studies and the reason and propose to the committee again
Certification Distribution Ceremony for Qualified National Experts
Ms. Uma asked for opinion to hold a Certification Distribution Ceremony for candidates who were qualified as National Experts on DIP anniversary event.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on the number of Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project. The target was 50 factories on Energy Management System and 75 projects on System Optimization. Each year there should be 15 factories participating Energy Management System and 75 projects on System Optimization. Energy Management System could coordinate with TLC project and System Optimization could coordinate with TEM project.
The committee unanimously approved that the project should coordinate
Creation of working group
Mr. Kobchi suggested forming the working group in order to coordinate between project partners
The committee unanimously approved that the project should create working group and propose to director general.
Announcement: The next meeting will be held in 2015
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m.
18
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.6 Project Steering Committee Meeting 4/2015
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Venue: Epsilon Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power
Presiding: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion
Members Present: Mrs. Supa Tangkittikhun Department of Industrial Promotion
Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta The Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Prasong Norajit Department of Industrial Works
Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Mr. Pongsak Laoswatchaikul Office of Industrial Economics
Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul CIMB Thai
Miss Nanthawan Janprateep Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand
Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha UNIDO
Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai IEE Project
Observers Present: Mr. Samakki Pocharoen Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Witawat Jainatee Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Sorawids Chailertwanitkul UNIDO
Mr. Sarun Panyatham CIMB Thai
Miss Atchareeya Pongput IEE Project
19
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Absent: Representative from the Office of Industrial Economics
Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, in Epsilon Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas, Chairperson, at 10:00 a.m.
Session 1 Committee’s Report:
Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas informed that Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, was occupied by govern-ment duty therefore Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas was authorized to be in charge as Chairperson
The committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.
Session 2 Secretary’s Report:
The minutes of the February 19, 2014, meeting was approved as read.
Session 3 Old Business:
Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, informed that according to Project Steering Committee meeting on February 19, 2014, the committee unanimously approved to form working group in order to support and monitor project activities. Reference letter No.1/2557, creation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Working Group.
Ms. Uma reported that referring to the letter no. 30/2558, the project steering committee member had changed from Director of Bureau of Targeted Industries Development to Director Division of Sectoral Industries Development 2
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Session 4 Information
Project Steering Committee Representative Assignment
Mrs. Sutavade Techajunta, Director of Inspection Body Accreditation Group, Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI) informed that Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit, Deputy Secretary-Generals, was retired. The new Deputy Secretary- General position was in assignment process.
Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan, representative from Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE) informed that Mrs. Sirinthorn Vongsoasup was retired. The department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency assigned Mrs. Amaraporn Achawangkul, Energy Conservation Expert, to be representative.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2014
Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2014 as follows:
20
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Energy System Management Workshops were held as follow: - September 15, 2014 in Khonkaen, September 29, 2014 in Songkhla, October 8, 2014 in Ayuthaya, October 13, 2014 in Bangkok and October 17, 2014 in Samutsakorn. - The total number of participants since the implementation was 408 out of 500 targeted participants or 82%.
Energy Management User Trainings in coordination with TISI were held as follow: - February 26-27 and March 11-12, 2014 in Bangkok, May 14-15, 2014 in Rayong, July 23-24, September 10-11 and November 24-25, 2014 in Bangkok. - The total number of factories since the implementation was 144 out of 300 targeted factories or 48%.
Energy System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2, Module 1 and 2 on May 21-23 and September 3-5, 2014 with 7 government personnel, 21 National Expert Candidates and 9 host factory representatives
System Optimization User Trainings in coordination with DIP were held as follow: - February 17-18 and June 17-18, 2014 Compressed Air System Optimization - July 1-2 and December 2-3, 2014 Pumping System Optimization - July 21-22 and December 11-12, 2014 Steam System Optimization - Total 612 participants were trained from 400 targeted participants or 153% - Steam System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2 on August 25-27, 2014 with 11 National Expert Candidates and 11 host factory/ candidate plant representatives - Compressed Air System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2 on September 22-26, 2014 with 9 National Expert Candidates and 4 host factory/ candidate plant representatives
Certification Distribution Ceremony for Qualified National Experts was held at the celebration of Department of Industrial Promotion’s 72nd anniversary on August 28, 2014. 29 Energy System Optimization National Experts Batch 1 and 30 System Optimization National Experts Batch 1 attended the event.
Steam System Optimization vendor seminar and trainings as follow: - August 29, 2014 and November 13-14, 2014 in Bangkok. - The total number of vendors attended the trainings was 22 out of 50 targeted vendors or 45%
Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity was studied by delivering questionnaire to 13 factories representatives and financial institutions. Group meeting and interview were organized to brainstorm the scope of financial capacity building training for financial institutions and factories.
The study showed that creditability was the first criteria used in the credit underwriting process for loan approval. Moreover, the financial institutions did not have any special method for any loan application for energy efficiency project. However, IEE project could strengthen and support both factories and financial institutions to understand the financial criteria for industrial energy efficiency project and financial proposal preparation.
Financial Capacity Building training would start in 2015 and would be held at least 4 trainings.
There was no target number of participant in this component but IEE Project would continue to organize the training to support factories and financial institutions.
The estimate energy savings were based on Energy Management System and System Optimization assessment reports. The potential results delivered 25,990 MWh of electricity savings or 31% from target 83,723 MWh, and 630,900 GJ of fuel savings or 33% from target 1,914,142 GJ. Total potential emission reduction was 46,000 tCO2 or 23% from target 196,757 tCO2.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Mid-term Evaluation
21
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Mr. Sanjaya informed that during April to May, international evaluator and national evaluator would meet with DIP executives and other project partners. The objective of the evaluation was to monitor project activities execution and co-financing in order to improve project activities. The report would be circulated to the committee when it was done.
Mr. Kobchai suggested that there should be an extra evaluation focusing on project activities monitoring since it could be a guideline for other projects in the future and PMU should organize another project steering committee meeting to monitor the evaluation results.
Mr. Sanjaya informed that the mid-term evaluation was a part of activity to comply with GEF regulations. However, the committee could give feedback to the evaluator and attend the overview evaluation result on the last day.
The committee unanimously approved that the working group would invite the committee to attend the evaluation result presentation and then circulated draft result within the committee.
Session 5: Consideration Issue
Link the existing government’s energy reward to the recognition program stated in the project document
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on linking the existing government’s energy reward to the recognition program.
Mr. Kobchai commented that qualified national experts could suggest factory representatives to participate energy efficiency projects from Ministry of Industry and Ministry of Energy. For the factories that did not qualify the energy reward, the project could invite them to attend extra trainings in order to support and enhance their energy efficiency in their factories.
The committee unanimously approved that the working group would coordinate with TISI and DIP focal point to start the framework on recognition program.
Use the existing mechanism to support the peer-to-peer network
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on using the existing mechanism to support the peer-to-peer network between the training participants.
Mr. Kobchai suggested that the qualified national experts could help forming the network between training participants and factory representatives.
Ms. Supa also commented that IEE Project activities could combine with Division of Sectoral Industries Development 2’s activities and Ministry of Energy’s activities.
The committee unanimously approved that the PMU would coordinate with the working group to create the framework and establish the peer-to-peer network.
Guidance in term of sustainability after project’s termination
Ms. Uma asked for opinion on framework to be prepared on energy Management System and System Optimization training activities after the project terminated.
Mr. Kobchai suggested that PMU should organize a seminar for training participants to magnify the results before and after participating the project activities and also an extra training or a consultation from national experts to enhance energy efficiency in their factories
22
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
The committee unanimously approved that the PMU would coordinate with the working group to plan the activities.
Promote the System Optimization Approach to other relevant agencies
Ms. Uma asked for advice on how to promote System Optimization Approach to other relevant agencies.
Mr. Kobchai suggested that the project should create System Optimization e-learning course and promote it and other System Optimization activities through project partner’s websites to expand targeted participants.
The committee unanimously approved that the working group would coordinate with DIP focal point to discuss the framework on e-learning course and activity promotion.
Announcement: The next PSC meeting will be held in 2016
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m.
23
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
A.7 Project Steering Committee Meeting 5/2017
Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Venue: Kamonporn Room, Sukosol Hotel
Presiding: Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion
Members Present: Mr. Jaruphan Jarayophat Director of Division 2 of Sectoral Industries Development Department of Industrial Promotion
Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta Acting Expert on Technical Regulations The Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Engineer, Experienced Level Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Mr. Panotson Sujayanont Mechanical Engineer, Senior Level Department of Industrial Works
Mrs. Luckana Thitithamrongchai Office of Industrial Economics
Miss Woranart Meepoomroo The Federation of Thai Industries
Miss Nanthawan Janprateep Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand
Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO
Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, IEE Project
Observers Present: Miss Kitsiri Kaewpipat Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Industry
Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion
Miss Salita Sinlapabodin Department of Industrial Promotion
Mr. Sorawids Chailertwanitkul UNIDO
24
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Observers Present: Miss Praweenaporn Arunrad Office of Industrial Economics
Mr. Nuttawut Chuenarom IEE Project
Miss Atchareeya Pongput IEE Project
Absent: Representative from CIMB Bank
Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Monday, January 17, 2017, in Kamonporn 1 Room, Sukosol Hotel. The meeting was called to order by Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon, Chairperson, at 10:30 a.m.
Session 1 Committee’s Report:
Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon greeted the committee and opened the annual Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Steering Committee meeting.
Session 2 Secretary’s Report:
The minutes of the February 24, 2015, meeting was approved as read.
Session 3 Information
Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2016
Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2016. According to project document, there were four components to deliver outcomes from the achievement of outputs and implementation of the activities as followed: ISO Compliant Energy Management Systems, Industrial Energy Systems Optimization, Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity and Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects. IEE project was implemented on 6 March 2012 and had completed 87% of activities. The project was expected to complete all activities within 30 June 2017. IEE project was granted 3,620,000 USD from Global Environment Facility. By that time, the funding had been spent 3,255,646 USD. The main expenses were the cost of national and international expert, training and instrument etc.
Co-financing for the project was divided into cash and in-kind. In-kind included time the management and staffs spent in project activities and training venue etc. Cash included utility cost, meeting and training expense and consultant fees etc. For industrial sector, in-kind co-financing included time and expense the factories spend for project activities and training, and cash co-financing included training registration fees, implementation fees and certification fees.
Ms. Uma informed that project partners could inform PMU if they had additional information and figures on co-financing.
1,012 factories from 50 provinces (Bangkok and industrial estate areas) attended project activities. 7 target industrial sectors consisted of food and beverages, textiles, paper and paper products, chemicals and chemical products, rubber and plastics products, non-metallic mineral products and basic metals. The objectives and expected outcomes identified in project document were thermal savings, electricity savings and greenhouse gas reductions. PMU had evaluated the implementation reports from national experts and found that factories that
25
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
implemented energy management system and system optimization had potential to save thermal energy and reduce greenhouse gas more than the expected savings (1,914,142 GJ and 196,757 CO2 tons of emissions), and also electricity usage at 94% of expected savings (93,714 MWh). However, PMU had subcontractor to assess the actual savings for 150 factories for energy management system and 150 factories for system optimization. The progress was currently ongoing.
Component 1: ISO Compliant Energy Management Systems
PMU in coordination with TISI organized system optimization trainings and the activities outputs were as follow: - Publish and distribute more than 2,700 training manuals in Thai and English along with 1,150 copies of ISO 50001 standard and 4,500 sets of promotional materials such as bag, notebook and pen. - Website, basecamp project management program and membership registration were created to establish peer to peer network among training participants. - 62 qualified national experts/ factory personnel trained on energy management systems - 364 factories out of 300 targeted factories attended 2 days Energy Management User Trainings. - Awareness workshop with total number of representatives from management level of 604 out of 500 target participants.
Component 2: Industrial Energy Systems Optimization
PMU in coordination with DIP organized system optimization trainings and the activities outputs were as follow: - Publish and distribute more than 3,000 copies of training manual on Steam, Pumping, Fan and Compressed Air. - 60 vendors/ suppliers from 50 target vendors attended system Optimization vendor training were - System Optimization National Expert training were held and there are 39 out of 50 qualified experts. At that time, Fan system optimization expert training was still ongoing and Fan system optimization expert examination would be held in February. System Optimization National Expert training and examination were expected to complete by June 2017. - 1,126 out of 400 targeted participants attended system Optimization User Training
Component 3: Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity
PMU in coordination with DEDE organized component 3: Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity as follow: - Study on Industrial EE Financing Capacity was finished and the report was circulated to project partners. - Total 34 participants from 9 financial institutions attended 2 Financial Capacity Building trainings for financial sector. - Total 97 participants from 40 factories attended 3 Financial Capacity Building trainings for industrial sector.
Component 4: Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects
The estimate energy savings were based on Energy Management System and System Optimization assessment reports. The progress was determined as below: - Energy management survey for 150 factories was being conducted. - ISO 50001 Energy Management System Implementation was conducted by qualified national experts. 38 out of 50 factories were completed; 23 factories were certified, 15 factories had been completed but not yet certified. 12 factories were on process of implementation. - 57 out of 75 targeted systems assessments were completed. 10 systems under TEM and biomass project were under the process of handling assessment reports. However, there were a number of assessments that PMU had not received the reports from national experts yet. - 50 system optimization implementation projects were on progress. - 3 out of 25 targeted case studies were completed.
26
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Ms. Uma informed that according to midterm review that was conducted in 2015, there were comments from international evaluator as below: - The sustainability of training activities. After the project closure, project partners would use the training contents and materials, and PMU would consider delivering the contents to other institutes. - The possibility to integrate training content to university curriculum. The purpose of the integration was to incorporate the study of energy management system and system optimization in university level.
Ms. Uma added that working group meeting was conducted on 7 September 2016 and the solutions about training content integration were as follow: - Deliver training material to project partners - PMU had discussed with qualified national experts who also were university lecturers and they concluded that PMU should adjust some of training contents to be more suitable for university curriculum. PMU would focus on Energy Management System in conformance with ISO 50001 and Steam System Optimization. When the new contents completed, PMU would distribute to project partners and university without any expenses.
IEE Project activities in 2017
Ms. Uma informed the committee about the planned activities in 2017 as follow: - PMU in coordination with TISI would organize 2 Energy Management System User trainings on February and June. - PMU in coordination with DIP would organize awareness workshop, Biomass operator training, and 2 steam system optimization assessments. - PMU in coordination with DEDE would develop E-learning program on financial evaluation content to be fully interactive. Currently it is under bidding process.
Moreover, PMU would create promotional video on Energy Management System and System Optimization, organize curriculum integration with university, focus group meeting to promote project activities and outcomes, and project closure event.
The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.
Session 4: Consideration Issue
Extension of project end date
Ms. Uma proposed to extend the project end date from 31 August 2017 to 28 February 2018.
Since there was some delay in some factories under Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation program therefore, this component would be expected to complete within June 2017. After that the project would need to prepare for final review, document management, project asset and equipment transfer to project partners.
Mr. Sanjaya added that the reason the project needed to extend the closing date for 6 months was to follow up on the outcomes of Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation. This information would be benefit for project partners and GEF as a donor. Moreover, the process of final review were expected to finish on the new closing date.
The committee unanimously approved to extend the project closing date to 28 February 2018.
Industrial Energy Efficiency Achievement Awards
Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on Industrial Energy Efficiency Achievement Awards. Factories that had participated in project activities could send their case studies and the winner would be invited to present their case in the conference abroad. The objective of this award was to obtain case studies as per stated in project document.
27
Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting
Mrs. Sutavadee agreed to organize the event but concerned if it would duplicate with Energy Awards of Ministry of Industry.
Mr. Jaruphun commented that there were similar competitions under Ministry of Industry. If possible, PMU should propose other kind of activity for committee to consider.
Ms. Woranart agreed to organize the awards and added that industrial sector could benefit from the event such as the winner would be guest interviewee in project partner events, or the winning factory would allow site visit.
Mr. Pongpan also agreed to organize the event and suggested to categorize the prizes into systems as in project document.
Mrs. Luckana agreed with other committee and suggested that PMU should have clear award rule and criteria for transparency. PMU should also promote and demonstrate that industrial sector would benefit from this activity.
Ms. Nantawan suggested that PMU should be aware of confidential information from the factories.
Ms. Uma informed that PMU would send documents out to be filled by factories and the working group would discuss about the awards criteria.
Mr. Panotson agreed that the awards would motivate the factories and added that PMU should select factories to compete in the international level, therefore the project could extend the outcome of project activities.
Mr. Sanjaya informed that the project needed information on energy saving, technique, energy investment and commitment to share with industrial sector. However, the project were willing to follow the committee resolutions.
Mr. Worawit suggested that the PMU needed clear criteria and fair awards judges. The application duration should not too short to avoid any complaint from the factories
Mr. Jaruphun advised that the working group should start discussing the criteria and details of the awards to avoid rush application duration.
Ms. Uma added that the awards would be held under Industrial Energy Efficiency Project name.
The committee unanimously approved to organize Achievement Awards and working group would discuss in details about the awards criteria.
Transfer of assets and instruments to project partners
Ms. Uma informed that after the project closure phase, PMU would transfer assets and office equipment to DIP. Instruments would be transferred to DIP, DEDE and DIW. TISI did not request to obtain the instrument since there was no need to use in the field work. Each representative from project partners had already discussed about instrument distribution.
Mr. Worawit informed that 53 instrument would be distributed based on usage in the field. However, some instruments had other equipment attached therefore PMU would arrange groups of instrument and circulate letter to inform project partners again.
The committee unanimously approved to coordinate with representative from project partners on equipment distribution.
Announcement: The next PSC meeting will be held before final review which is expected to be in September or November 2017
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m.
29
Annex BGrant and Co-financing
Annex B
Grant and Co-financing
30
Annex BGrant and Co-financing
B.1 GEF’s Grant
The GEF grant of $3,620,000 was utilized for the project implementation. The details of budget allocation and grant utilization are shown in Table b.1.
Table b.1 GEF’s grant utilization
Budget Line GEF Grant Disbursed (US$)
1100 - International Experts 1,378,691.30
1500 - Project Travel 81,518.16
1700 - National Experts 733,479.36
2100 - Subcontracts 545,227.27
3000 - Trainings/Fellowships/Study Tours 248,412.52
3500 - International Meetings 19,996.68
4300 - Premises 2,350.30
4500 - Equipment 350,437.03
5100 - Sundries 189,356.30
Total 3,549,469
Table b.2 Explanation of budget line
Class Nature of expense
1100 Long-term and short-term international experts.
1500 Travel of international and national staff holding contracts with UNIDO.Travel expenditures away from duty station
1700 National experts/ Consultants
2100 All costs relating to subcontracts up to 20,000 EURO of contract service
3000 All costs of individual fellowship/ delegate programme/ study tours/ in-service training
3500 All costs related to the meeting excluding UNIDO staff travel
4300 Office rent, office cleaning, maintenance and repairs, including garage and related costs.
4500 All equipment, non-expendable and expendable equipment, freight charges for non-expendable equipment, major repairs to non-expendable equipment. Clearing forwarding and insurance charges
5100 Vehicle maintenance, insurance, repairs and operations including fuels and lubricantsDocuments printing, photocopying, translating Miscellaneous costs
31
Annex BGrant and Co-financing
B.2 Co-financing
Table b.3 Detail of co-financing (exchange rate = 31.54 Baht/$ as of 1 February 2018)
Co-financier Type Estimated Amount ($) Contribution during implementation ($)*
Ministry of Industry- Department of Industrial Promotion- Thai Industrial Standards Institute
Cash and In-kind 2,445,000 1,708,563
Ministry of Energy- Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
In-kindLoan
200,0005,000,000
1,633,8851,328,605
SME Development Bank Loan 3,000,000 Not specified
CIMB Thai Loan 5,000,000 Not specified
Industrial Sector Cash and In-kind Not specified 1,825,893
Total co-financing 15,645,000 6,496,946
*Based on calculation of the actual contribution and participation in the project activities
The basis of calculation for co-financing is shown in Table b.4.
Table b.4 Description of co-financing
Type of co-financing
Project’s Partners Industry
Cash utility’s cost, organizing training, printing of training materials, consultant fee
registration cost of training (industry), investment for improvement project, certification cost
In-kind Management’s and staff’s time, premises facilities
personnel’s time and costs incurred from attending trainings and implementing EnMS and SO projects in participating industries
Loan Loan amount provided to the factories participated in the project activities
33
Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets
Annex C
List of Project’s Equipment and Assets
34
Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets
C.1 Equipment
During the implementation phase, the IEE project procured the equipment to support the energy assessment and monitoring. After the project termination, all equipment was transferred to the project partners as suggested by the PSC. The list of equipment and the recipients is shown in Table c.1.
Table c.1 List of equipment
No. Items Amount Transfer to
DIP DEDE DIW
1 Flue gas analyzer, BACHARACH PCA3 5 3 0 2
2 Flue gas analyzer, TESTO350 1 1 0 0
3 Infrared camera, FLIR E40 5 2 2 1
4 TDS/Conductivity analyzer, Amprobe WT-60 3 1 1 1
5 Ultrasonic flow meter, GE PT878 3 1 1 1
6 Tachometer, Extech 3 1 1 1
7 Ultrasonic leak detector, UE System 3 2 1 0
8 Ultrasonic leak detector, Amprobe ULD-300 5 5 0 0
9 Temperature gun, Fluke 561 5 4 1 0
10 Digital thermometer, Fluke 51 5 3 2 0
11 Temperature probe for Fluke 51 4 3 1 0
12 Power clamp meter, Extech 5 4 1 0
13 Power Quality Analyzer, Fluke 43B 3 1 1 1
14 Pressure transducer PV350 3 2 1 0
15 TrakAIR 4 Channel data logger (DP3040) 10 8 2 0
16 TrakAIR 8 Channel data logger (DP3080) 10 6 4 0
17 TrakAIR Compressed Air Flow transducer (DP3100-U2430) 10 7 3 0
18 TrakAIR Pressure Transducer 0-200 psig (DP3920-0200) 40 32 8 0
19 TrakAIR Pressure Transducer 0-1000 psig (DP3920-0200) 4 2 2 0
20 TrakAIR Current Transducer Input 0-5 AAC / Output 4-20 ma DC (DP3830-U5420)
20 12 8 0
21 TrakAIR Current Clamp (DP3850-1000M) w / Output Loop connector (DP3850-LC01)
34 24 10 0
22 TrakAIR KW Transducer 6 4 2 0
23 TrakAIR Universal Transducer cable (DP3351-0050) (50 ft.)
72 52 20 0
24 Glove class O 5 4 1 0
25 Heat resistant duck tape 5 5 0 0
26 Stop watch 5 5 0 0
27 Troche 5 3 0 2
28 Digital camera, Cannon powershot A3400 5 5 0 0
29 TrakAir CA flow transducer FKT-3DP1A-5-80-400 2 1 1 0
30 Stroboscope Shimpo DT-311A-2 2 1 1 0
35
Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets
No. Items Amount Transfer to
DIP DEDE DIW
31 Outdoor/Industrial data logger 3 2 1 0
32 H0B0 Current Transducer [CTV-C] 100A 3 2 1 0
33 H0B0 Current Transducer [CTV-D] 200A 3 2 1 0
34 H0B0 warePro : Graphing&Analysis software 3 2 1 0
35 Onset U12-001 (HOBO U12 Temp) 2 1 1 0
36 Onset TMC6-HD 6 ft Air/Water / Soil Temp (waterproof) 3 2 1 0
37 Onset TMC20-HD 20 ft Air/Water / Soil Temperature Probe 3 2 1 0
38 Onset T-VER-PXU-L Differential air pressure transducer sensor
2 1 1 0
39 Onset AC-SENS-1 CABLE-ADAP5 12V 400mA sensor AC power adapter
2 1 1 0
40 Onset CABLE-4-20mA 4-20 mA input adapter cable 4 3 1 0
41 Onset CABLE-2.5-STEREO 0 to 2.5Vdc input adapter cable 4 3 1 0
42 Onset CABLE-ADAP5 0 to 5Vdc input adapter cable 4 3 1 0
43 FlowKintetics: S-Type Universal length pitôt tube attaches to pipe and tubing Rated to 450 deg F (232 deg C)
1 1 0 0
44 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160-18 (Stainless steel Pitot tube, 5/16" dia., 18-5/8" insertion length)
5 5 0 0
45 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-02 (Ellipsoidal tip Pitot tube, 0.48 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
46 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-03 (Ellipsoidal tip Pitot tube, 0.8 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
47 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-05 (Ellipsoidal tip Pitot tube, 1.22 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
48 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-06 (Ellipsoidal tip Pitot tube, 1.52 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
49 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-U (Ellipsoidal tip Universal Pitot tube, attaches to any length of 3/4" sch. 40 pipe)
2 2 0 0
50 Dwyer Pitot tube model 166-6 2 2 0 0
51 Dwyer Pitot tube model 166-12 2 2 0 0
52 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160S-48 ("S" type stainless steel Pitot tube, 1.21 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
53 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160S-60 ("S" type stainless steel Pitot tube, 1.52 meter insertion length)
2 2 0 0
36
Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets
C.2 Project’s Assets
The project procured a vehicle, computers and accessories, office furniture, and office supplies to use for the day-to-day operation. After the project termination, the project’s assets were transferred to DIP according to the PSC’s suggestion. The list of project’s assets is shown in Table c.2.
Table c.2 List of assets
Description Amount
1 Toyota Innova 2.0 1
2 Cabinet CB-72 Blue 3
3 Cabinet with glass door 3
4 Cabinet with glass door 4
5 Chair Furradec SR2-AC 2
6 Chair Furradec TARIS Black/Blue 9
7 Desk L shape 160 × 60 cm. 1
8 Desk 200 × 87 × 74.5 cm. 1
9 Desk Furradec ST150D 1
10 Meeting table Furradec ETC 180 1
11 Drawer Modernform SOHO 2
12 Small shelf 1
13 Phone 2
14 Iphone 4s 16GB 2
15 Samsung S5360 1
16 Samsung A5 1
17 Desktop HP Pavillion p6-2172L 2
18 Desktop Hp Pavillion 1
19 Monitor HP W1972b LED 18.5” 1
20 Monitor Samsung LED 18.5” 1
21 Toshiba Protege R830 1
22 Toshiba Protege R930 1
23 Sony VAIO T 13.3” 1
24 Logitech Keyboard K120-920-002582 1
25 Logitech wireless mouse 1
26 Server system 1
27 HP Laserjet Pro M1212nf 1
28 HP Laserjet Pro M12W 1
29 HP Color Laserjet Pro CP1025 1
30 Projector Panasonic LB2VEA LCD 1
31 Camera Sony HDR-CX190E Full HD 1
32 Camera Canon Powershot A2300 IS 16 MP 1
37
Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets
Description Amount
33 Camera Canon EOS 600DKIT 18-55IS 1
34 Whiteboard Fuji OA 90 × 150 cm. 1
35 Whiteboard OA 80 × 120 cm. 1
36 Flipchart 1
37 Amplifier with speaker Deccon 2
38 Extension cord 10
39 Cupboard Furradec 120 1
40 Table 127. 2 × 40 × 76.5 cm. 1
41 Table 121.9 × 61 × 74.3 cm. 1
42 Fan 2
43 Water storage RW0336 9 l 1
44 Electric Hot Pot Toshiba PLK-GF22S 1
45 Microwave Electrolux 1
46 Refrigerator Sharp 1
39
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Annex D
Energy Saving Calculation
40
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Tab
le d
.1 E
ner
gy s
avin
g ca
lcu
lati
on o
f all
mea
sure
s im
ple
men
ted
wit
h t
he
IEE
Pro
ject
’s d
irec
t su
pp
ort
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Aero
flex
1
Surv
ey e
nerg
y sa
ving
2015
214
10
942
8
217
2Re
duce
Sys
tem
Lea
kage
2015
152
7730
415
4Am
pol F
ood
Proc
essi
ng
3St
eam
leak
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
2015
48
620
97
240
4Re
duce
leak
age
(Com
pres
sed
Air)
2015
375
189
750
379
Apex
Pla
stec
h
5Re
duce
leak
age
2015
262
13
252
4
265
6Ai
r Com
pres
sor S
eque
nce
Cont
rol S
yste
m20
1529
014
758
029
37
Inst
all h
igh
effic
ienc
y ai
r com
pres
sor
2015
6533
130
668
Redu
ce A
ir in
let T
empe
ratu
re20
1536
818
673
637
3Ba
ngko
k Iro
n an
d St
eel
Wor
k 9
Turn
Off
the
pum
p20
1522
12
44
2310
Inst
alle
d VS
D c
ontr
olle
r20
1526
613
453
226
9Be
er th
ip b
rew
ery
(1991
)
11O
ptim
ize
Set P
oint
Gly
col s
yste
m B
for
ferm
enta
tion
proc
ess
2015
10
520
10
12Im
prov
e Ef
ficie
ncy
Biog
as P
roce
ss
2015
158
3015
13In
crea
sing
% C
onde
nsat
e Re
turn
2015
490
460
980
9314
Repl
ace
light
s in
war
ehou
se20
151.5
13
215
Chan
ge b
oile
r's fu
el to
Bitu
min
ous
coal
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
16Co
nden
sate
retu
rn im
prov
emen
t20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a17
Redu
ce le
akag
e in
the
syst
em20
1681
4181
41BS
Met
al18
Redu
ce le
akag
e20
1526
13
52
27C.
P. R
ice
19Re
duce
unl
oad
time
of P
olish
er20
1533
1
167
662
33
520
Redu
ce le
akag
e in
Air
com
pres
sion
sys
tem
2015
195
9939
019
821
Ener
gy e
ffici
ent A
ir co
nditi
on re
plac
emen
t20
158.
214
168
22Re
plac
e Fl
uore
scen
t with
LED
ligh
ting
2015
9.48
519
1023
Inst
all V
SD in
blo
wer
sys
tem
2015
340
172
680
344
24Re
duce
air
com
pres
sor p
ress
ure
from
8 to
5 b
ar20
1521
110
742
221
4
41
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Cere
bos
(Lae
m C
haba
ng)
25Im
prov
e co
nden
sing
uni
t of c
hille
rs20
1517
4
8834
8
176
26Im
prov
e co
nden
sing
uni
t of c
hille
d an
d fr
eeze
pr
oces
s20
1533
1766
34
27Re
duce
load
sto
red
in fr
eeze
r20
156.
463
137
28Re
duce
leak
from
com
pres
sed
air
2015
3618
7237
29Be
tter
con
trol
for C
T-60
020
1521
310
842
621
630
Hea
t rec
over
y fr
om C
onde
nsat
e20
151,
580
973,
160
193
31CI
P im
prov
emen
t20
156,
320
387
12,6
4077
4Ce
rebo
s (P
inth
ong)
32St
op u
sing
Dia
phra
gm p
ump
2015
148
75
296
15
033
Usi
ng h
eat
pum
p to
red
uce
stea
m d
eman
d fr
om
boile
r20
157,
403
453
14,8
06
906
34Re
duce
hot
wat
er c
onsu
mpt
ion
in C
IP P
roce
ss20
156,
629
406
13,2
5881
1Ch
an C
ha R
ern
Foam
35In
sula
tion
impr
ovem
ent
2015
11
66
23
212
36Fi
x St
eam
trap
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
37Cl
ean
boile
r com
bust
ion
room
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Char
oen
Pokp
hand
Foo
ds(M
ahac
hai P
lant
)38
Incr
ease
Con
dens
ate
Reco
very
2016
1.7
60
.17
1.76
0.17
39D
ecre
ase
Blow
dow
n20
16
0.2
0.0
2
0.2
00
.02
Char
oen
Pokp
hand
Foo
ds
(Non
gjok
Pla
nt)
40Fi
t VSD
to b
oile
r fan
2013
3.5
2
14
7.0
841
Redu
ce c
hille
r con
dens
ing
pres
sure
2013
4.5
218
9.0
842
Redu
ce le
akag
e20
1556
528
61,
130
571
43Li
nk a
ll co
mpr
esso
r hou
ses
by n
ew p
ipin
g an
d in
stal
l new
VSD
Air
Com
pres
sor.
2015
187
9537
419
0
44Re
duce
tem
pera
ture
at c
ompr
esso
r hou
se20
1518
936
19Ch
aroe
n Po
kpha
nd F
oods
(S
arab
uri P
lant
)45
Leak
redu
ctio
n20
1626
0
131
260
13
1
Cosm
os46
chan
ge b
oile
r blo
w d
own
rate
2016
1,
250
97
1,25
097
CP R
am47
Feed
wat
er E
cono
miz
er20
15
1,78
413
8
3,56
827
6
42
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
CP R
am (L
adkr
aban
g pl
ant)
East
ern
Poly
pack
48Le
ak re
duct
ion
2016
20
1020
1049
Com
pres
sed
air l
eake
d im
prov
emen
t20
1588
0
445
1,76
0
889
50Ch
iller
impr
ovem
ent
2015
515
260
1,0
3052
0Ea
ster
n Po
lypa
ck
(Pla
nt N
o.2)
51Re
duce
Com
pres
sor I
nlet
Tem
pera
ture
(F
rom
36.
7 C
to 3
5.5
C )
2015
23
1246
24
52Re
duce
Gen
erat
ion
Pres
sure
from
8.2
Bar
s to
7.9
0 B
ars
2015
5628
112
57
East
ern
Poly
pack
(P
lant
No.
3)53
Chan
ge C
ompr
esso
r Run
ning
Ord
er20
1529
2
128
584
25
554
Redu
ce S
yste
m L
eaka
ge20
151,
271
642
2,54
21,
285
F&N
Dai
ries
55Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2015
n
/a n
/a
n/a
n/a
56Re
duce
blo
wdo
wn
rate
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
57Fl
ash
stea
m re
cove
ry20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a58
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a59
Redu
ce s
team
leak
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
60St
eam
trap
fix
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
61Re
duce
pre
ssur
e (2
015
)20
1540
2080
4162
Redu
ce S
yste
m L
eaka
ge (2
015
)20
1536
1972
3763
Leak
redu
ctio
n (2
016
)20
1667
3467
34Fr
iend
ship
Cor
n St
arch
64D
ecre
ase
Blow
dow
n20
16
0.2
50
.02
0.0
00
.25
0.0
2Fr
iesl
and
Cam
pina
65D
ecre
ase
Blow
dow
n ra
te20
16
195
15
195
15Fu
engf
uana
nt
66Su
rvey
ene
rgy
savi
ng (E
lec)
2015
287
14
557
4
290
67Su
rvey
ene
rgy
savi
ng (T
herm
al) B
ioga
s20
1511
,954
23,9
08
Gov
ernm
ent P
harm
aceu
tical
O
rgan
izat
ion
68In
crea
se %
RH in
pro
duct
ion
area
2015
195
99
390
19
869
Chan
ge s
witc
hing
per
iod
of b
oile
r20
15
192
384
Hw
afon
g Ru
bber
(T
haila
nd)
70Im
prov
e fe
ed w
ater
qua
lity
(RO
sys
tem
)20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n
/a71
Redu
ce le
akag
e on
6 b
ars
line
2015
7840
156
7972
Redu
ce le
akag
e on
8 b
ars
line
2015
398
201
796
403
73Re
duce
leak
age
on 1
8 ba
rs li
ne20
1513
468
268
136
74Ch
ange
to h
igh
effic
ient
air
com
pres
sor
2015
1,31
066
22,
620
1,32
4
43
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Inno
late
x75
redu
ce li
ghtin
g at
the
wal
k w
ay20
155.
68
311
6
76
rem
odel
Gas
sta
tion
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
77
Inst
all v
apor
izer
2015
354
2270
843
78
Repl
ace
fluor
esce
nt la
mp
with
LED
2015
1.71
32
79
Incr
ease
Tem
p fr
om 2
4C to
26C
in E
T ar
ea20
158.
414
179
IRPC
80D
evel
op p
rost
eam
for r
eal t
ime
mon
itorin
g th
eir s
yste
m20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n/
a
JBF
81D
ecre
ase
Blow
dow
n20
16
240
15
240
15Ka
naya
ma
Kase
i82
Impr
ove
Insu
latio
n20
15
154
9
308
17Ku
lwon
g
83Re
plac
e lig
hts
from
T8
to L
ED20
1517
9
34
1884
Redu
ce o
pera
ting
time
of th
e ai
r con
ditio
ners
2015
7438
148
7585
Redu
ce p
ress
ure
of c
ompr
esse
d ai
r sys
tem
2015
1.97
14
286
Rota
te th
e he
at s
ink
of c
ompr
esse
d ai
r sys
tem
2015
1.61
32
Mon
key
King
Foo
d
87im
prov
e st
eam
leak
2016
27
2
272
88ch
ange
boi
ler b
low
dow
n ra
te20
1610
87
108
7N
atio
nal S
tarc
h &
Che
mic
al
89Sw
itch
off o
ne s
et o
f ins
trum
ent '
s ai
r dry
er20
1537
19
74
3890
Redu
ce S
yste
m L
eaka
ge20
1512
061
240
122
91Co
mpr
esso
r con
trol
on
trim
com
pres
sor
2015
9347
186
95PI
Indu
stry
92Tr
im p
ump
impe
ller
2015
123
62
246
12
5Pr
emie
r Can
ning
Indu
stry
93st
eam
leak
s m
aint
enan
ce p
rogr
ams
2016
925
8892
588
PTT
Glo
bal C
hem
ical
(P
lant
5)
94To
tal E
nerg
y Sa
ving
in 2
014
Y20
14
42,0
00
3,45
812
6,0
00
10,3
7595
Tota
l Ene
rgy
Savi
ng in
20
15Y
2015
26
7,0
00
15,5
3753
4,0
00
31,0
7596
Tota
l Ene
rgy
Savi
ng in
20
16Y
2016
31
3,0
00
18,17
331
3,0
00
18,17
3Re
d Bu
ll 19
88
97Re
duce
Sys
tem
Lea
kage
2015
102
52
204
10
498
Redu
ce G
ener
atio
n Pr
essu
re20
158
416
8
44
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Saha
viriy
a Pl
ate
Mill
99Co
ntro
l ope
ratio
n m
ain
mot
or a
t lev
eler
2013
604
30
52,
416
1,
222
100
Cont
rol t
ime
for T
urn
on/o
ff o
f mot
or h
ydra
ulic
pu
mp
at c
oolin
g be
d20
1388
0.16
352
0.6
4
101
Cont
rol m
otor
of c
oolin
g to
wer
by
VSD
2013
4312
172
4910
2In
stal
l VSD
mot
or fo
r Hot
wat
er p
ump
2014
5729
171
8710
3In
stal
l Hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
Air-
cond
ition
ing
2014
2111
6333
104
Bett
er c
ontr
ol fo
r bal
l rol
ling
proc
ess
2015
6,44
03,
253
12,8
806,
506
105
redu
ce m
otor
's RP
M20
1510
252
204
104
Saha
viriy
a St
eel I
ndus
trie
s
106
Redu
ce d
isch
argi
ng te
mpe
ratu
re o
f sla
b to
124
0 C
(Cha
nge
oper
atio
n pr
actic
e)20
13
40,19
33,
101
16
0,7
7212
,40
4
107
Inst
all h
igh
effic
ienc
y re
cupe
rato
r at
furn
ace
no. 2
2013
84,7
826,
562
339,
128
26,2
49
Sura
bang
yika
n
108
Redu
ce s
team
in b
ottle
was
hing
pro
cess
20
13
5,78
844
8
23,15
21,
792
109
Inst
all
VSD
(Va
riabl
e Sp
eed
Driv
e) 2
00
kW
for
St
ack
& B
ag F
ilter
no.
1 Bl
ower
20
1361
130
92,
444
1,23
6
110
Chan
ging
ligh
ting
to L
ED (1
50 W
to L
ED 5
0 W
) 20
1359
3023
612
011
1Ch
angi
ng t
rans
pare
nt r
oof
for
bott
le p
lant
(re
-du
cing
usi
ng li
ghtin
g en
ergy
) 20
1391
4636
418
4
112
Impr
ove
Inci
nera
tor n
o.1
2013
15,6
071,
208
62,4
284,
832
113
Exce
ss a
ir re
duct
ion.
2015
18,6
201,
441
37,2
402,
883
114
blow
-dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2015
23,7
941,
842
47,5
883,
683
115
Stea
m le
ak m
aint
enan
ce p
rogr
am20
1519
,263
1,49
138
,526
2,98
2Te
p Ki
nsho
Foo
ds
116
Redu
ce E
lect
ricity
in F
REEZ
ER R
oom
2015
303
15
360
6
306
117
Mai
nten
ance
Spl
it ty
pe A
ir Co
nditi
on20
1544
422
488
844
9Th
ai C
onta
iner
s G
roup
11
8Fi
ne tu
ne %
O2
(Yea
rly S
ervi
ce b
y Su
pplie
r)20
15
2,39
418
5
4,78
837
111
9In
stal
l ins
ulat
ion
on n
aked
pip
e20
1520
516
410
32Th
ai M
MA
120
Inst
all A
PC s
yste
m fo
r MM
A#2
plan
t20
15n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
121
Chan
ge L
ED P
roje
ct20
1517
689
352
178
122
Chan
ge c
oolin
g fa
n bl
ade
2015
4925
9850
45
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Thai
Nip
pon
Rubb
er In
dust
ry
123
Inst
all t
imer
for a
ir-co
nditi
oned
2015
6.96
4
14
712
4In
stal
l Coo
ling
Tow
er G
el M
achi
ne20
1510
520
1112
5In
stal
l VSD
at D
ippi
ng s
uppl
y pu
mp
2015
2111
4222
126
Preh
eat W
ash
wat
er b
y Co
nden
sate
wat
er20
1570
635
71,
412
713
Thai
Rua
m Ja
i Kor
at
127
Redu
ce id
le o
f Air
Com
pres
sor 1
2015
414
20
982
8
419
128
Redu
ce e
nerg
y in
take
blo
wer
725
120
1518
936
1812
9Cl
ose
redu
ce fa
n Co
olin
g 1
cell
2015
3418
6835
130
Redu
ce th
e am
ount
of e
xces
s ai
r 20
1593
836
1,87
673
131
Blow
-dow
n co
ntro
l20
1599
338
1,98
677
132
Preh
eat a
ir in
let
2015
1,76
368
3,52
613
6Th
ai U
nion
Fro
zen
Prod
ucts
133
Clea
n bo
iler
heat
tra
nsfe
r su
rfac
es –
boi
ler
B1
and
B720
15
1,10
285
2,
204
171
134
Inst
all E
cono
miz
er o
n bo
iler N
o. C
320
153,
255
252
6,51
050
413
5PR
V c
ontr
ol :
Fluc
tuat
ing
load
redu
ctio
n20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a13
6TD
S co
ntro
l : C
ontr
ol b
low
dow
n ra
te20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a13
7St
eam
trap
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
2015
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Tong
Sia
ng
138
Surv
ey e
nerg
y sa
ving
(Ele
c)20
1522
7
115
454
23
013
9Su
rvey
ene
rgy
savi
ng (T
herm
al) P
alm
She
ll20
15n/
an/
an/
an/
a14
0Fi
ne tu
ne %
O2
2015
7,59
031
115
,180
623
141
Retu
rn c
onde
nsat
e20
1516
,751
687
33,5
021,
374
142
Impr
ove
stea
m tr
ap le
aks
and
mac
hine
leak
age
2015
4,32
617
78,
652
355
TPI P
olen
e
143
Redu
ce d
eman
d of
Com
pres
sed
air
2015
129
65
258
13
114
4Re
mov
e Cu
rve
Belt
6.10
.02
2015
4.66
29
514
5Re
mov
e Cu
rve
Belt
6.10
.03
2015
4.66
29
514
6Re
mov
e Cu
rve
Belt
7.37
2015
4.66
29
5
46
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
Beg
inM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
UEN
O F
ine
Chem
ical
In
dust
ry14
7In
stal
l New
boi
ler &
Eco
nom
izer
2015
12
,159
682
24
,318
1,36
414
8Re
duce
blo
wdo
wn
rate
2015
975
194
1114
9Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2015
n/a
n/
an/
a
n/a
21,7
5492
1,82
968
,543
46,1
661,
862,
651
Rem
ark:
1. Th
e di
rect
sup
port
from
the
proj
ect c
onsi
sted
of t
he e
xper
t tra
inin
g fo
r hos
t fac
ility
and
can
dida
te p
lant
, the
EnM
S im
plem
enta
tion
and
the
syst
em o
ptim
izat
ion
asse
ssm
ent.
2. n
/a =
not
ava
ilabl
e, th
e co
mpa
ny d
escr
ibed
wha
t the
y ha
ve d
one
to im
prov
e en
ergy
effi
cien
cy, b
ut th
ey d
id n
ot p
rovi
de th
e qu
antit
ativ
e da
ta fo
r cal
cula
tion.
3. T
he c
alcu
latio
n of
the
redu
ctio
n of
GH
G e
mis
sion
use
the
follo
win
g co
-effi
cien
t.
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r grid
ele
ctric
ity
: 0
.505
1 tC
O2 /
MW
h
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r fue
l oil
:
77.4
tC
O2 /
TJ
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r coa
l :
94.6
tC
O2 /
TJ
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r nat
ural
gas
:
56.1
tCO
2 /TJ
–
Emis
sion
s Fa
ctor
for L
PG
: 61
.2
tCO
2 /TJ
–
Emis
sion
s Fa
ctor
for B
iom
ass
: 0
.693
tC
O2 /
ton
4. T
he d
urat
ion
for
GH
G r
educ
tion
calc
ulat
ion
is f
rom
the
impl
emen
ting
year
to
the
end
of p
roje
ct (2
017
). Fo
r ex
ampl
e, a
mea
sure
impl
emen
ted
in 2
015
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
for 2
yea
rs o
f dire
ct im
pact
dur
ing
the
IEE
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n. It
has
bee
n as
sum
ed th
at th
e sa
ving
wou
ld b
e co
nser
vativ
ely
coun
ted
for 2
016
and
20
17.
47
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Tab
le d
.2 E
ner
gy s
avin
g ca
lcu
lati
on o
f all
mea
sure
s im
ple
men
ted
by
the
fact
orie
s at
ten
din
g th
e 2
-day
use
r tr
ain
ings
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Adity
a Bi
rla C
hem
ical
s1
Inst
alle
d VS
D c
ontr
olle
r20
16n/
a
n/a
n/a
n/
a 2
Inst
all h
igh
effic
ienc
y m
otor
20
16n/
a
n/a
n/a
n/
a Ai
r Liq
uide
Tha
iland
3In
stal
led
VSD
con
trol
ler
2015
148
75
296
15
04
Inst
all r
eflec
tion
pane
l at l
ight
ing
2015
37
1974
37
Alph
atex
Indu
strie
s5
Resc
hedu
le S
uppl
y-Re
turn
ope
ratio
n20
1521
9
111
438
22
26
insu
latio
n im
prov
emen
t20
15
306
1761
233
Apex
Pla
stec
h
7Ch
ange
old
inje
ctio
n no
. 7 to
All
Elec
tric
In
ject
ion
Mac
hine
2015
193
97
386
19
5
8Ch
ange
old
inje
ctio
n no
. 13
to A
ll El
ectr
ic
Inje
ctio
n M
achi
ne20
1516
2
8232
4
164
9Ch
ange
old
inje
ctio
n no
. 14
to A
ll El
ectr
ic
Inje
ctio
n M
achi
ne20
1516
2
8232
4
164
10Ch
ange
Flu
ores
cent
T8
to L
ED20
1575
38
150
76
Asia
Fib
er11
Clea
n 2
cond
ensi
ng u
nit
2015
300
15
260
0
303
12In
sula
tion
impr
ovem
ent
2015
42
224
84
447
Bang
kok
Alco
hol
Indu
stria
l13
Fix
stea
m tr
ap le
aks
2015
10
66
21
212
14In
stal
led
VSD
con
trol
ler
2015
n/a
n/
a n/
a
n/a
Bang
kok
Iron
and
Stee
l W
orks
15Re
duce
leak
age
2016
n/a
n/
a n/
a
n/a
16In
stal
l rin
g-lo
op p
ipe
2016
n/a
n/
a n/
a
n/a
17In
stal
l seq
uenc
e co
ntro
ller
2016
n/a
n/
a n/
a
n/a
18U
se h
igh
effic
ienc
y ai
r com
pres
sor
2016
n/a
n/
a n/
a
n/a
19In
stal
l VSD
of F
an o
f mot
or N
o.1
2015
139
70
278
141
Berg
soe
Met
als
20In
stal
l VSD
of F
an o
f mot
or N
o.2
2015
139
70
278
141
21Ch
ange
new
bur
ner a
t Fur
nace
120
15
1,44
311
2
2,88
622
322
Chan
ge n
ew b
urne
r at F
urna
ce 2
2015
1,
443
112
2,
886
223
23Co
mpr
esse
d ai
r sys
tem
effi
cien
cy im
prov
emen
t20
1524
12
48
24Be
tagr
o24
Chan
ge n
ew ro
of s
heet
Whi
ch th
e su
nlig
ht
can
pass
thro
ugh
2015
30
1560
30
48
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Beta
gro
Hol
ding
25In
stal
l VSD
con
trol
ler t
o ai
r com
pres
sor
2015
58
2911
6
5826
Inst
all E
cono
miz
er20
15
2,71
217
1
5,42
434
2Ca
rdin
al H
ealth
222
27
Use
hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
mot
or20
1529
2
148
584
29
6
Carp
ets
Inte
rnat
iona
l Th
aila
nd
28Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2015
n/a
n/
a n
/a
n/a
29Bl
owdo
wn
rate
redu
ctio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a30
Flas
h st
eam
reco
very
2015
n/
a n/
a
n/a
n/a
31Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2016
1,
516
96
1,51
696
32Re
duce
boi
ler's
wor
king
hou
rs20
16
2,72
117
2
2,72
117
2
Cere
bos
(Pin
thon
g pl
ant)
33Re
duce
str
eam
pre
ssur
e20
16
109
7
109
7 34
Impr
ove
prod
uctiv
ity a
t Ret
ort p
roce
ss20
16
157
10
157
1035
Impr
ove
prod
uctiv
ity b
y re
duce
hea
ting
time
2016
60
138
60
138
36Im
prov
e In
sula
tion
2016
13
69
13
69
37In
stal
l hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
mot
or (3
15 k
W)
2017
82
41n/
cn/
c
Char
oen
Pokp
hand
Fo
ods
(Sar
abur
i Pla
nt)
38In
stal
l hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
mot
or (2
50 k
W)
2017
72
36n/
cn/
c 39
Min
i Pel
let M
ill20
1711
5
58n/
cn/
c 40
Impr
ove
com
bust
ion
cham
ber a
t boi
ler 1
2017
4,
921
269
n/
cn/
c 41
Fix
the
com
bust
ion
cham
ber
2017
38
817
n/
cn/
c Ch
usin
conc
rete
42Ai
r-co
mpr
esso
r sys
tem
2016
3
13
1
43re
duce
set
poi
nt o
f air
com
pres
sor
2016
7
37
3
44Im
prov
e Po
wer
fact
or v
alue
by
inst
all C
apac
itor
2016
22
1122
11
45Im
prov
e po
wer
fact
or o
f tra
nsfo
rmer
2016
33
1733
17
46Im
prov
e po
wer
fact
or o
f EV
G m
otor
2016
94
4894
48
47Im
prov
e po
wer
fact
or o
f con
cret
e cu
tter
mot
or20
1642
21
42
21Co
smos
Bre
wer
y 48
Redu
ce e
xces
s ai
r20
16
9,05
285
6
9,05
285
649
Impr
ove
effic
ienc
y : r
educ
e fu
el u
sage
2016
18
,526
1,0
390
18,5
261,
039
CP-M
eiji
50In
stal
l VSD
air
com
pres
sor
2016
459
23
245
9
232
CPRA
M51
Inst
alle
d VS
D c
ontr
olle
r20
1565
33
130
66
52Se
t run
ning
seq
uenc
e by
sel
ectin
g hi
gh
effic
ienc
y pu
mp
first
2016
n/a
n/
an/
a
n/a
49
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
East
Wat
er53
Inst
alle
d VS
D c
ontr
olle
r20
16n/
a
n/a
n/a
n/
a 54
Inst
all h
igh
effic
ienc
y m
otor
20
16n/
a
n/a
n/a
n/
a 55
inst
all V
SD c
ontr
olle
r to
air c
ompr
esso
r (10
0 h
p)20
1511
0
5522
0
111
56Ch
ange
Flu
ores
cent
to L
ED
2015
10
520
10
Forw
ard
Free
land
57Ch
ange
ligh
ting
syst
em fr
om 4
00
W
to L
ED 1
8 W
2015
24
1248
25
58In
stal
l new
air
cond
ition
er 1
2,0
00
Btu
20
152
1
4
259
Redu
ce le
akag
e20
1512
6
24
1260
Blow
dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
61
Impr
ove
Insu
latio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a Fu
engf
uana
nt62
Flas
h st
eam
reco
very
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
63Co
nden
sate
reco
very
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
64Fi
x St
eam
leak
s20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a G
J St
eel
65Re
duce
com
pres
sed
air s
et p
oint
2015
328
16
665
6
331
Giff
arin
e Sk
ylin
e La
bora
tory
& H
ealth
Car
e
66Ad
just
coo
ling
wat
er fl
ow ra
te20
1612
3
6212
3
6267
Adju
st c
hille
r sch
edul
e20
1665
33
65
3368
Redu
ce s
team
wor
king
pre
ssur
e (B
oile
r)20
16
206
1520
615
Haa
d Th
ip (S
urat
than
i)69
Chan
ge H
ibay
to L
ED
2016
61
3161
31
70Co
nden
sate
reco
very
2016
30
319
303
19
Imco
Pac
k Co
rpor
atio
n
71Ch
ange
Ven
tilat
ion
fan
to E
vapo
rativ
e Co
olin
g Sy
stem
2016
1,34
0
677
1,34
0
677
72Ch
ange
Wat
er C
ool C
hille
r to
Air C
ool C
hille
r20
161,
633
82
51,
633
82
573
VSD
Con
trol
for C
oolin
g Pu
mp
2016
618
31
261
8
312
Inte
rpro
file
74Re
duce
leak
age
2016
59
3059
30
75Re
duce
inle
t air
tem
pera
ture
2016
n/a
n/
an/
a
n/a
76Re
duce
com
pres
sed
air w
orki
ng p
ress
ure
2016
10
510
5
77In
stal
l VSD
air
com
pres
sor
2016
17
917
9
50
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
IPD
Pac
kagi
ng78
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
16
W @
4,35
0 u
nit
2016
229
11
622
9
116
IRPC
(BTX
Pla
nt)
79H
eat i
nteg
ratio
n of
Uni
t10
0 &
400
at B
TX P
lant
2016
18
6,53
710
,464
18
6,53
710
,464
Kanc
hana
sing
korn
80Co
olin
g to
wer
impr
ovem
ent
2016
331
16
733
116
781
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
20
1660
30
6030
82Ch
ange
Dist
iller
y sy
stem
from
dire
ct to
indi
rect
2016
1,
314
102
1,31
410
283
Inst
all 2
nd p
late
hea
t exc
hang
er20
16
1,0
01
771,
00
177
Kim
berly
-Cla
rk84
Chan
ge n
ew 2
air
com
pres
sors
2015
316
16
063
2
320
King
Mill
ing
(Sur
atth
ani)
85Pr
oduc
tivity
impr
ovem
ent :
redu
ce e
nerg
y us
age
2015
20
811
41
623
86Re
duce
leak
age
2016
1,05
8
535
1,05
8
535
87Re
duce
com
pres
sed
air w
orki
ng p
ress
ure
2016
350
17
735
0
177
88U
se b
oost
er d
evic
e at
the
high
pre
ssur
e w
ith
low
dem
and
proc
ess
2016
117
59
117
59
89In
stal
l seq
uenc
e co
ntro
ller
2016
899
45
489
9
454
90In
stal
l VSD
air
com
pres
sor
2016
95
4895
48
Kohl
er (T
haila
nd)
91M
aint
enan
ce a
ir-co
mpr
esso
r20
1510
1
5120
2
102
92Sw
itch
off l
ight
dur
ing
lunc
h br
eak
2015
246
12
449
2
249
93M
easu
re c
ombu
stio
n ef
ficie
ncy
at A
HU
Pla
nt
no. 1
-720
15
2,53
214
25,
064
284
94Pr
e-he
at th
e ai
r at P
lant
520
15
1,89
910
73,
798
213
95Re
duce
runn
ing
hour
s fr
om 13
hou
rs
to 1
1 ho
urs
2015
84
447
1,68
895
Krab
i veg
etab
le o
il96
Blow
dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2016
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
97Re
duce
leak
age
2016
77
3977
39
Kura
shik
i Sia
m R
ubbe
r98
Redu
ce in
let a
ir te
mpe
ratu
re20
1697
49
97
4999
Redu
ce c
ompr
esse
d ai
r wor
king
pre
ssur
e20
1682
42
82
4210
0Re
duce
pre
ssur
e se
t poi
nt o
n sh
ut d
own
perio
d20
1533
17
66
3310
1Re
duce
ele
ctric
al c
onsu
mpt
ion
of li
ghtin
g sy
stem
2015
1
0.3
82
1
51
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
LPN
Pla
te M
ill P
ublic
102
Redu
ce a
ir-co
nditi
oner
con
sum
ptio
n in
can
teen
2015
7
414
7
103
Redu
ce M
otor
Exh
aust
Blo
wer
usa
ge20
1566
34
132
67
104
Redu
ce e
nerg
y co
nsum
ptio
n at
sta
rt-u
p re
heat
furn
ace
2015
2,
506
194
5,
012
388
105
Chan
ge n
ew m
etho
d to
con
trol
tem
pera
ture
at
ove
n20
15
41,7
593,
232
83
,518
6,46
4
106
chan
ge b
ulb
250
W to
LED
Low
Bay
150
W20
1563
32
126
63
Luck
y St
ar W
eavi
ng10
7Re
duce
ope
ratio
n tim
e of
Con
vers
ion
Mac
hine
2015
153
77
306
15
510
8Re
duce
com
pres
sed
air l
eaka
ge20
1513
5
6827
0
137
Map
Ta
Phut
Ole
fins
109
Redu
ce e
xces
s ai
r20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a M
C To
wa
Inte
rnat
iona
l Sw
eete
ners
110
Inst
alle
d VS
D c
ontr
olle
r20
1627
6
140
276
14
0
MSC
PR
Two
111
Use
7.5
kW
air
com
pres
sor f
or 3
7 kw
in
nig
ht ti
me
2015
56
2811
2
56
112
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
20
1511
6
22
11N
atio
nal S
tarc
h &
Che
mic
al11
3Fi
x th
e im
pelle
r pum
p (W
earin
g co
nditi
on)
2016
62
3162
31
Naw
arat
Pat
anak
arn
114
Redu
ce o
ffice
ele
ctric
al c
onsu
mpt
ion
2015
43
2286
43
New
Bio
dies
el11
5In
sula
tion
impr
ovem
ent
2016
4,
438
243
4,43
824
3
Nis
sen
Chem
itec
116
inst
all n
ew L
ED20
1521
4
108
428
21
611
7Ch
ange
to n
ew L
ED20
1563
32
126
63
NYC
Indu
srtr
y
118
Chan
ge H
ibay
to L
ED H
ibay
20
0W
2015
68
3513
6
6911
9Ch
ange
T8
46W
to In
duct
ion
Lam
p 12
0W
2015
2
14
2
120
Chan
ge F
lood
Lig
ht 4
00
W to
20
0W
2015
6
312
6
Oka
mot
o Te
xtile
121
Chan
ge 2
00
W to
120
W b
ulb
2015
5
310
5
122
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
18
Wat
t20
1561
9
313
1,23
8
625
123
Insu
latio
n im
prov
emen
t at p
lant
420
15
188
15
376
29
52
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Poly
foam
Kab
inbu
ri12
4Bl
owdo
wn
rate
redu
ctio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n
/an/
a 12
5Im
prov
e In
sula
tion
2015
n/
a n/
a
n/a
n/a
12
6Fi
x St
eam
leak
s20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a 12
7Fi
x St
eam
trap
s20
15
n/a
n/a
n
/an/
a
Pram
uanp
hol
128
Inst
all V
SD a
ir co
mpr
esso
r20
1615
8
15
812
9Ch
ange
Flu
ores
cent
to L
ED
2015
99
5019
8
100
130
Ener
gy re
duct
ion
activ
ity a
t lun
ch b
reak
2015
134
68
268
13
5Pr
emiu
m F
oods
131
Ener
gy re
duct
ion
in c
ompr
esse
d ai
r sys
tem
2015
86
4317
2
87
Prim
e Pr
oduc
t Ind
ustr
y13
2Ch
ange
fuel
from
LPG
to B
iom
ass
2015
2,
827
178
05,
654
357
133
Redu
ce e
nerg
y co
nsum
ptio
n of
Hig
hbay
ligh
ting
2016
31
1531
15
PTT
Glo
bal C
hem
ical
(P
lant
2)
134
Repa
ir In
stru
men
t air
leak
age
2014
175
88
525
26
513
5A-
110
A/B
oper
atin
g tim
e op
timiz
atio
n20
1411
9
6035
7
180
136
P-20
5 Im
pelle
r coa
ting
2014
17
851
25
137
Blow
dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2016
4
0.2
2
40
.22
138
chan
ge n
ew ty
pe o
f air
com
pres
sor
2016
552
27
955
2
279
139
stop
A-0
301
2016
142
72
142
72
140
adju
st lo
ad C
-030
2,C-
088
1 du
ring
TRSD
2016
1
0.3
81
0
.38
PTT
Glo
bal C
hem
ical
(P
lant
4)
141
Add
BRS
Supp
ly -8
to -7
2016
80
4080
40
142
stop
A-0
201
and
A-02
21 in
TRS
per
iod
2016
1
0.3
81
0
.38
143
EPP-
stea
m-1
: Brin
g cr
ude
HX
to p
urify
at
T-1
704
by p
ass
thro
ugh
T-17
03
2016
26
615
26
615
144
Redu
ce e
xces
s ai
r20
16
n/a
n/a
n
/a n
/a
145
Flas
h st
eam
reco
very
2016
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
146
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
16
n/a
n/a
n
/a n
/aPT
T G
loba
l Che
mic
al
(Pla
nt 1
2)14
7ER
P-El
ec-1
:Cha
nge
new
type
of A
ir Co
mpr
esso
r20
1652
2
264
522
26
4
148
Redu
ce p
ower
con
sum
ptio
n at
refr
iger
atio
n un
it20
1626
3
133
263
13
3
53
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
149
Redu
ce N
G c
onsu
mpt
ion
at fl
are
2016
3,
329
187
3,
329
187
PTT
Phen
ol15
0Re
duce
Ste
am c
onsu
mpt
ion
at D
ipp
colu
mn
2016
6,
068
340
6,
068
340
15
1Fl
ash
stea
m re
cove
ry20
16
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a15
2Fi
x St
eam
leak
s20
16
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a
PTT
Rayo
ng G
as
Sepa
ratio
n Pl
ant
153
Redu
ce fl
owra
te b
y tr
im im
pelle
r20
1593
0
470
1,86
0
939
154
Opt
imiz
e pu
mpi
ng s
yste
m20
151,
290
65
22,
580
1,
303
155
Non
-Met
allic
Wea
r rin
g20
157
4
14
8Ru
ey T
ay F
ibre
Indu
stry
156
Chan
ge 3
6W fl
uore
scen
t @
100
uni
t20
1516
8
32
16
Saha
thai
Prin
ting
and
Pack
agin
g15
7Fi
x St
eam
leak
s20
15
141
28
215
8Ch
ange
fuel
from
Fue
l Oil
to L
PG20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a
Saha
viriy
a St
eel
Indu
strie
s
159
Redu
ce e
xces
s ai
r20
15n/
a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
160
Impr
ove
Insu
latio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a16
1Fi
x St
eam
leak
s20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n
/a
Siam
Che
mic
al
Indu
stry
162
Redu
ce c
ompr
esse
d-ai
r lea
kage
2015
24
1248
24
163
Impr
ove
air-
cond
ition
er v
entil
atio
n20
1525
13
50
2516
4in
stal
l aut
omat
ic v
alve
2015
120
61
240
12
116
5Re
duce
chi
ller c
oolin
g w
ater
flow
2015
23
1246
24
166
Cont
rol c
oolin
g w
ater
flow
for p
rodu
ctio
n20
1528
7
145
574
29
016
7in
sula
tion
impr
ovem
ent a
t ho
t oil
and
Stea
m p
ipe
2015
14
58
29
016
168
Chan
ge n
ew B
urne
r of h
ot o
il he
ater
2015
77
243
1,
544
87Si
am C
oate
d Ab
rasi
ve16
9Co
nden
sate
reco
very
2016
25
014
25
014
Siam
Mits
ui P
TA17
0Tu
rn-o
ff o
ne p
ump
(Ove
r dem
and)
2016
282
14
228
2
142
Siam
Naw
aloh
a Fo
undr
y17
1im
prov
e ai
r-co
mpr
esso
r sys
tem
2016
40
2040
20
172
Set r
unni
ng o
rder
of a
ir co
mpr
esso
r to
mat
ch w
ith p
rodu
ctio
n de
man
d20
1523
3
118
466
23
6
Siam
Ste
el In
tern
atio
nal
173
Chan
ge m
ercu
ry li
ghtin
g to
Flu
ores
cent
lig
htin
g20
1551
26
102
51
54
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
174
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
20
152
1
4
217
5Tu
rn o
ff a
ir co
nditi
oner
at l
unch
bre
ak20
158
4
16
817
6ch
ange
to L
ED20
1510
5
20
1017
7In
stal
l Air
Knife
+ B
low
er
2015
88
4417
6
89Si
am Y
achi
yo17
8In
sula
te B
arel
inje
ctio
n m
achi
ne 2
20 to
n,
180
ton
2015
3
26
3
Sura
pon
Nic
hire
i Foo
d
179
Impr
ove
Air
supp
ly s
yste
m fo
r Pro
duct
ion1
2015
76
3815
2
7618
0Re
sche
dule
Air
Hou
sing
Uni
t on-
off t
ime
2015
37
1974
38
181
Adju
st c
ompr
esso
r of c
hille
r20
1518
9
36
1818
2Im
prov
e co
olin
g to
wer
/Con
dens
er s
yste
m20
1572
36
144
73
183
redu
ce s
team
leak
age
2015
1,
972
124
3,94
424
918
4Ch
ange
the
light
ing
syst
em to
LED
2015
171
86
342
17
3Su
rat T
hani
Bev
erag
e18
5In
sula
tion
impr
ovem
ent a
t boi
ler
2015
7
1
141
186
Hea
t pum
p20
15
520
40
1,0
4081
Sure
tex
187
Hea
t rec
over
y fr
om h
ot w
ater
2015
53
2710
6
54
188
cent
raliz
e al
l the
chi
llers
to m
ake
a co
mm
on
chill
er w
ater
sys
tem
2015
2,75
1
1,38
95,
502
2,
779
189
Impr
ovem
ent o
ven
insu
latio
n20
1524
12
48
25Th
ai D
aizo
Aer
osol
190
Redu
ce e
lect
rical
con
sum
ptio
n20
1515
1
7630
2
153
Thai
MM
A 19
1Re
duce
inle
t air
tem
pera
ture
2015
4
28
4
Thai
Sty
reni
cs19
2U
se h
igh
effic
ienc
y ai
r com
pres
sor
2015
0.2
5
0.13
0.5
0
0.2
6
Thai
Nip
pon
Rubb
er
Indu
stry
19
3Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2015
4
0.2
7
80
.54
194
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
15
482
30
964
61Th
ai P
olye
thyl
ene
195
Com
bine
HD
PE#4
/PP#
3 ai
r com
pres
sor s
yste
m20
161,
398
70
61,
398
70
6
Thai
Pol
yeth
ylen
e
Plan
t 1
196
Repl
ace
new
coo
ling
fan
(W-7
951A
,B)
2015
440
22
288
0
444
197
Com
bine
HD
PE#4
/PP#
3 ai
r com
pres
sor s
yste
m20
151,
398
70
62,
796
1,
412
198
Mod
ified
line
CW
at S
L co
oler
to re
duce
CW
us
age
2015
106
54
212
10
7
199
Opt
imiz
e C-
330
1 Lo
ad20
151,
242
62
72,
484
1,
255
55
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Thai
Pol
yeth
ylen
e Pl
ant 3
200
Sing
le s
lurr
y co
oler
of b
oth
reac
tors
H
100
0P
grad
e20
1566
33
132
66
201
Redu
ce te
mpe
ratu
re a
t eth
ylen
e pr
ehea
ter
(30
to 2
3 C)
2015
1,
00
456
.31
2,
00
811
3
202
Redu
ce re
flux
ratio
of d
istill
atio
n co
lum
nT-
570
3 (2
5 to
20
%)
2015
7,
830
439
15
,660
879
203
Redu
ce te
mp
ethy
lene
pre
heat
er
(from
30
to 2
3C)
2015
2
0.0
9
40
.18
204
Mas
s Co
lor
2015
2,90
7
1,46
85,
814
2,
936
Thai
Pol
yeth
ylen
e
Plan
t 7
205
C-50
2, C
-50
3A/B
Inst
all p
ress
ure
tran
smitt
er
(Suc
tion
Filte
r)20
1513
0
6626
0
131
206
VV
VF
to o
ptim
ize
elec
tric
al c
onsu
mpt
ion
for C
901
2015
73
3714
6
74
207
Redu
ce p
ower
con
sum
ptio
n by
pum
p co
atin
g (P
130
0A/
B/C)
2015
95
4819
0
96
208
C-25
02, C
-250
3A/B
Inst
all p
ress
ure
tran
smitt
er (S
uctio
n Fi
lter)
2015
142
72
284
14
3
209
VV
VF
to o
ptim
ize
elec
tric
al c
onsu
mpt
ion
for C
290
120
1595
48
190
96
210
Incr
ease
LS
flash
ste
am fr
om D
851
from
mod
ifica
tion
2015
2,
211
124
4,
422
248
211
Redu
ce S
team
con
sum
ptio
n of
deg
assi
ng p
urge
ai
r hea
ter b
y us
ing
ambi
ent t
empe
ratu
re
purg
e ai
r par
t red
uce
time
hot p
urge
2015
31
318
62
635
Thai
Rua
m Ja
i Kor
at
212
Redu
ce e
xces
s ai
r20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n
/a21
3Bl
owdo
wn
rate
redu
ctio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n/
a21
4Im
prov
e In
sula
tion
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
215
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n/
a21
6Pr
e-he
at a
ir be
fore
sup
ply
to c
ombu
stio
n ch
ambe
r20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n/
a
217
Redu
ce s
trea
m p
ress
ure
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
218
Fine
tune
%O
2 20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
a n/
a
56
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
Thai
Sili
cate
Che
mic
al21
9Re
duce
Nat
ural
gas
at F
urna
ce E
and
F
2016
3
0.3
3
0.3
220
Redu
ce N
atur
al g
as a
t Dry
ing
Proc
ess
2016
68
438
68
438
Thai
Tak
eda
Lace
(131
31)
221
Chan
ge to
LED
18
wat
t @1,
100
uni
t20
1574
37
148
75
Thai
Tak
eda
Lace
(139
99)
222
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
20
1530
4
153
608
30
7Th
ai T
oray
Syn
thet
ics
223
Impr
ove
com
pres
sor a
nd c
oolin
g to
wer
of
chi
ller
2015
350
17
770
0
354
224
Inst
all S
olar
cel
l 10
kw
p +
Chan
ge
to L
ED 1
8 w
att b
ulb
2015
9
518
9
225
Chan
ge F
luor
esce
nt to
LED
20
1511
0
5522
0
111
226
Redu
ce s
uctio
n pr
essu
re to
Com
pres
sor
2015
262
13
252
4
265
227
Inst
all C
hille
r aut
omat
ic c
ontr
ol20
151,
975
99
83,
950
1,
996
228
Ball
clea
ning
2015
47
2494
48
Thai
Uni
on F
roze
n Pr
oduc
ts22
9Ch
ange
to L
ED 2
0W
Pla
nt F
ish 2
2015
262
13
252
4
265
230
Inst
all H
ibay
LED
150
W20
1518
9
36
18
231
Boos
ter p
ump
SCM
2015
891
45
01,
782
90
0
Thai
Uni
ted
Awa
Pape
r
232
Blow
dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2016
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
233
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
16
n/a
n/a
n
/an/
a23
4Re
duce
inle
t air
tem
pera
ture
2016
n/a
n/
an/
an/
a23
5Re
duce
com
pres
sed
air w
orki
ng p
ress
ure
2016
n/a
n/
an/
a
n/a
236
Use
hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
air c
ompr
esso
r20
16 n
/a
n/a
n/a
n/
a23
7In
stal
l VSD
air
com
pres
sor
2016
n/a
n/
an/
a
n/a
Thai
food
s G
roup
238
Chan
ge T
8 to
LED
14 W
2015
159
80
318
16
123
9W
ashi
ng m
achi
ne c
hang
e en
ergy
sou
rce
from
el
ectr
icity
to s
team
and
Clo
thes
dry
ers
from
G
as to
Ste
am
2015
58
3
116
6
Thai
-Ger
man
Cer
amic
In
dust
ry24
0In
stal
led
VSD
con
trol
ler
2015
135
68
270
13
7
241
Inst
all n
ew h
igh
effic
ienc
y H
eat E
xcha
nger
20
15
1,24
797
2,
494
193
Than
apak
di24
2Fi
x St
eam
Tap
and
cha
nge
new
By
Pass
val
ve20
15
857
17
013
243
Cond
ensa
te re
cove
ry20
15
400
31
800
62
57
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
The
Siam
Con
stru
ctio
n St
eel
244
Redu
ce w
ater
con
sum
ptio
n20
151,
00
0
505
2,0
00
1,
010
245
Redu
ce le
akag
e20
1540
5
205
810
41
024
6Re
duce
inle
t air
tem
pera
ture
2015
23
1246
24
247
Redu
ce w
orki
ng h
ours
of M
illin
g m
achi
ne20
1519
2
9738
4
194
248
Inst
all t
imer
to tu
rn-o
n an
d tu
rn-o
ff
elec
tric
al H
eate
r cla
mp
2015
26
1352
27
249
Canc
el a
tran
sfor
mer
50
0 K
VA
2015
11
622
11
Tipc
o As
phal
t25
0Ch
ange
ligh
ting
syst
em fr
om 3
Uni
ts
to 2
Uni
ts (3
6W e
ach)
2015
4
28
4
251
Inst
all n
ew a
ir co
nditi
oner
tota
l 16
units
2015
40
2080
41
252
Redu
ce ru
nnin
g ho
urs
of m
illin
g m
achi
ne20
15
399
310
798
62
Toka
i Eas
tern
Rub
ber
(Tha
iland
)25
3Ch
ang
stre
et li
ght t
o LE
D
2015
18
936
18
254
Chan
g to
LED
bul
b20
1521
2
107
424
21
5
TPI P
olen
e
255
Fix
Expa
nsio
n Jo
int a
nd c
rack
ed tu
be
at T
ertia
ry a
ir du
ct 1
2016
14
1,48
113
,384
14
1,48
113
,384
256
Fix
Expa
nsio
n Jo
int a
nd c
rack
ed tu
be
at T
ertia
ry a
ir du
ct 2
2016
15
3,0
3414
,477
15
3,0
3414
,477
257
Fix
Expa
nsio
n Jo
int a
nd c
rack
ed tu
be
at T
ertia
ry a
ir du
ct 3
2016
16
1,32
615
,262
16
1,32
615
,262
U.R
. Che
mic
al25
8Re
duce
leak
age
2015
10
520
10
259
Cont
rol b
low
dow
n ra
te o
f air
drye
r20
150
.22
0
.110
.44
0
.22
Uen
o Fi
ne C
hem
ical
s In
dust
ry26
0Ch
ange
to h
igh
effic
ienc
y m
otor
s20
1672
36
72
3626
1Ch
ange
Flu
ores
cent
to L
ED
2016
83
4283
42
Uni
ted
Farm
er
& In
dust
ry26
2Co
ntro
l pro
duct
ion
proc
ess
23 k
Wh/
Tc20
162,
450
1,
238
2,45
0
1,23
8
Uni
ted
Win
ery
and
Dist
iller
y26
3Co
nden
sate
reco
very
2016
64
219
60
642
196
264
Redu
ce le
akag
e20
1638
19
38
19U
SAM
Inte
r gro
up26
5U
se b
oost
er d
evic
e at
the
high
pre
ssur
e w
ith lo
w d
eman
d pr
oces
s20
1612
6
12
6
58
Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation
Fact
ory
No.
Imp
lem
ente
d m
easu
res
Year
En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 /
yr)
Tota
l En
erg
y sa
vin
gs
Tota
l GH
G
Red
uct
ion
(to
n C
O2 )
Sta
rtM
Wh
/yr
GJ/
Yr
MW
hG
J
266
Inst
all r
ing-
loop
pip
e20
1680
41
80
4126
7Re
duce
exc
ess
air
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
268
Blow
dow
n ra
te re
duct
ion
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
Uto
pian
269
Impr
ove
Insu
latio
n20
15
n/a
n/a
n/
an/
a 27
0Co
nden
sate
reco
very
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
271
Fix
Stea
m le
aks
2015
n/
an/
a
n/a
n/a
272
Fix
Stea
m tr
aps
2015
n/
a n
/a
n/a
n/a
Y.T.
Rubb
er
273
Impr
ove
Was
te W
ater
Tre
atm
ent P
lant
El
ectr
ical
Con
sum
ptio
n20
1540
20
80
41
274
Redu
ce fr
ee-r
un o
f mac
hine
2015
101
51
202
10
227
5Im
prov
e lig
htin
g co
ntro
l20
1511
6
22
1127
6Ad
just
con
trol
val
ve a
t Bur
ner o
f Dry
er20
15
1,66
310
5
3,32
621
0To
tal
39,8
7477
7,33
683
,019
65,1
4185
0,3
5010
1,0
23
Rem
ark:
1. Th
e fa
ctor
y pe
rson
nel a
tten
ded
the
2-da
y us
er tr
aini
ngs
and
appl
ied
the
know
ledg
e to
impr
ove
thei
r ene
rgy
usag
e.
2. n
/a =
not
ava
ilabl
e. T
he c
ompa
ny d
escr
ibed
wha
t the
y ha
ve d
one
to im
prov
e en
ergy
effi
cien
cy, b
ut th
ey d
id n
ot p
rovi
de th
e qu
antit
ativ
e da
ta fo
r cal
cula
tion.
n/c
= no
t cou
nt.
The
com
pany
impl
emen
ted
ener
gy e
ffici
ency
mea
sure
s in
20
17. T
here
fore
, the
sav
ings
per
yea
r are
sho
wn,
but
the
tota
l sav
ings
are
not
cou
nted
.
3. T
he c
alcu
latio
n of
the
redu
ctio
n of
GH
G e
mis
sion
use
the
follo
win
g co
-effi
cien
t.
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r grid
ele
ctric
ity
: 0
.505
1 tC
O2 /
MW
h
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r fue
l oil
: 77
.4
tCO
2 /TJ
–
Emis
sion
s Fa
ctor
for c
oal
: 94
.6
tCO
2 /TJ
–
Emis
sion
s Fa
ctor
for n
atur
al g
as
: 56
.1 tC
O2 /
TJ
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r LPG
:
61.2
tC
O2 /
TJ
– Em
issi
ons
Fact
or fo
r Bio
mas
s
: 0
.693
tC
O2 /
ton
4. T
he d
urat
ion
for G
HG
redu
ctio
n ca
lcul
atio
n is
from
the
impl
emen
ting
year
to th
e en
d of
pro
ject
(20
17).
For e
xam
ple,
a m
easu
re im
plem
ente
d in
20
15 w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed
fo
r 2 y
ears
of d
irect
impa
ct d
urin
g th
e IE
E pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion.
It h
as b
een
assu
med
that
the
savi
ng w
ould
be
cons
erva
tivel
y co
unte
d fo
r 20
16 a
nd 2
017
.
59
Annex ECapacity Building Program
Annex E
Capacity Building Program
60
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.1 Original Workshop and Training Program
Originally, the capacity building program was designed to provide training/workshops for five categories as illustrated in Figure e.1.
Figure e.1 Original design of capacity building program
The detail of each training/workshop is described below.
0.5-day awareness workshop
Objective: awareness raisingMain target: factory management (in target sectors)Other targets: factory personnel, consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: overview of energy management system (ISO 50001) and introduction of system optimizationTraining time: 0.5 day
0.5-day training for vendor/supplier
Objective: provide overview of system optimization (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)Main target: equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts Content: overview of system optimization (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)
1.5-day training for bank personnel
Objective: enhance the understanding of the bank personnel on energy efficiency measuresMain target: bank personnelInstructor: Thai expertsContent: basic information about energy systems and energy efficiency measures, site visit to the Energy Efficiency Demonstration Building
61
Annex ECapacity Building Program
2-day user training on EnMS
Objective: support the factory intending to implement EnMS Main target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Other targets: consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, CBsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: step-by-step on how to implement EnMS
2-day user training on SO
Objective: provide the SO self-assessment basic and best practices to improve the systemMain target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Other targets: consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: Fundamental of system approach and how to assess the system (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)
2-day training on Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries
Objective: provide the information of EE related financial loan available and guide the factory personnel on the bankable financial proposal developmentMain target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Instructor: Local experts Content: EE related financial loan in Thailand, underwriting process, and step-by-step on how to prepare the bankable financial proposal
Expert training on EnMS
Objective: train experts who can support the factory to implement EnMS in the future and be the national trainers for the project Main target: consultants, certification body (CB), factory personnelOther targets: government officersInstructor: international expertsContent: advance EnMS course divided into 3 modules (3-4 days/modules) at the interval of 3-4 months, and the on-the-job training with host facilities under the international experts’ supervision
Expert training on SO
Objective: train experts who can conduct the SO assessment and be the national trainers for the projectMain target: consultants, equipment vendors/service providers, ESCOsOther targets: government officersInstructor: international expertsContent: advance SO assessment (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system) and the individual assessment with host facilities under the international experts’ supervision
62
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.2 Modification of Workshop and Training Program
After conducting several trainings and workshops, the feedback from the participants were analyzed. The gap analysis of the original capacity building program found that:
- The participants of the awareness workshops would like to learn from other factories that have successfully implemented EnMS.
- The CB participants of 2-day EnMS training would like to learn more about technical parts of EnMS such as energy review, energy performance indicators, baseline setup, and the fundamentals of basic utilities in the factory. It would ensure that the CB would learn about the basic energy perspectives of EnMS and have common understanding of the technical clauses in the standard.
- In addition to the EnMS, TISI officers who act as Accreditation Body would like to learn about the transition of EnMS and lessons learned from other countries.
- There is a technical gap between the user and expert training. The user training offers the fundamentals of EnMS and SO by emphasizing the techniques that can be applied on site, while the expert training provides more in-depth technical knowledge, hands-on exercises, and the practice in host factories. There is a need for a more technically-oriented course than the typical user training requested by the factory personnel, consultants, CB, and equipment/service providers; however, they did not have enough time to attend a long training like the expert training.
- One of the feedbacks from the expert training participants is the long training period. The project has taken note of the dropout rate of the EnMS expert training’s participants. 8% of the total participants or 7 persons could not finish the 3 training modules within the 10-month duration.
- Some potential candidates hesitate to participate in the expert training because they were afraid of failing the exam. There is a significant rate of absence to attend the examination, 15% for EnMS expert training and 24% for SO expert training. Moreover, the rate of SO participants of the 1st batch who failed the exam is quite high at 33%. This makes it more difficult to convince the participants of the 2nd batch to partake in the examination.
- The 0.5-day vendor training presents too basic content in the suppliers’/vendors’ perspective. There is a request to provide more technical content, by for example using the SSAT program during the vendor training.
- The factory personnel who attended a 2-day user training would like to learn more technical details, but did not want to attend the full expert training due to too long training period.
Based on the above feedback and analysis, the project has revised two existing trainings and designed 6 new training courses as described below.
- Revised awareness workshop: The discussion panel with the representatives from host facilities was added in the afternoon session to make it almost a 1-day workshop. In some workshops where the host facility’s representative could not attend, the records of his or her experience were sharing with the participants.
- Revised vendor training: The 2-day user training material was revised integrating some parts of the expert training to become the new course content for the vendor training. The training was 1.5 day with an additional 2-hour brainstorming session.
- CB training: CB training was developed as a technically-oriented course for CBs who were familiar with ISO standards, but did not have a strong background on energy systems. The 2-day training provided the information of some common utilities and their performance indicators such as boiler, compressed air, pump, chiller and air conditioning unit. The participants also learned about the energy review and baseline generation using regression analysis. The exercises and case studies were used to ensure that the participants could do the simple calculation themselves. TISI officers were also invited to join this training.
63
Annex ECapacity Building Program
- AB training: The transition of ISO 50001 and other related issues were explained and discussed during this 1-day training.
- EnMS intensive training: The intensive training is a 4-days training in 2 months intervals for the shorter version of expert training and case-based exercises. The training was catered to factory personnel who wanted to learn and practice more on EnMS implementation. Some consultants and CBs who missed the expert training also joined the intensive training. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.
- SSO technical training: The SSO technical training was a combination of a 2-hour webinar as a pre-requisite and a 2-day classroom training focused on the technical analysis and case-based exercises with equipment demonstration. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.
- CASO technical training: The CASO technical training was a combination of a 2-hour webinar as a pre-requisite and a 2-day classroom training focused on the technical analysis and case-based exercises with equipment demonstration. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.
- Biomass boiler’s operators training: During the study of biomass boiler and its steam system improvement, the project found that the biomass boilers’ efficiency could be improved by changing the practice of the biomass operators. The operators highly influence the efficiency of biomass boilers by simple operations such as closing the opening of the boiler and maintaining good housekeeping for biomass storage. However, operators have limited access to the training course since most of the courses targeted engineers and focused on theory and calculation. Therefore, the project designed a new training course for biomass boilers’ operators. This 2-day training focused on the good practice of biomass boiler operation, improvement measures, and demonstration of simple measurements to calculate boilers efficiency.
These revised and newly developed courses reflected the flexibility of the program and continuous improvement of the program itself to fulfill the stakeholders’ needs and to close the loop of the supply chain for improving the efficiency of energy usage in the industry.
64
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E. 3 Training Materials and Tools
The list of training materials and tools in the project is shown in Table e.1.
Table e.1 List of training materials and tools
Training Materials and Tools Language
1. Awareness Raising
1.1 Presentation
1.1.1 A new day in energy management English, Thai
2. Energy Management System
2.1 Presentation
2.1.1 EnMS 2-day user training English, Thai
2.1.2 Expert training (3 modules) English
2.1.3 CB training English
2.1.4 AB training English
2.1.5 Intensive training presentation English
2.2 Guideline
2.2.1 Energy management system implementation English, Thai
2.3 Tools
2.3.1 EnMS tool English, Thai
3. System Optimization
3.1 Presentation
3.1.1 SSO 2-day user training English, Thai
3.1.2 CASO 2-day user training English, Thai
3.1.3 PSO 2-day user training English, Thai
3.1.4 FSO 2-day user training English, Thai
3.1.5 SSO technical training English
3.1.6 CASO technical training English
3.1.7 Biomass boiler’s operator training Thai
3.2 Guideline
3.2.1 SSO guideline for user training English, Thai
3.2.2 CASO guideline for user training English, Thai
3.2.3 PSO guideline for user training English, Thai
3.2.4 FSO guideline for user training English, Thai
3.2.5 SSO guideline for expert training English
3.2.6 CASO guideline for expert training English
3.2.7 PSO guideline for expert training English
3.2.8 FSO guideline for expert training English
65
Annex ECapacity Building Program
Training Materials and Tools Language
3.3 Tools
3.3.1 Steam System Scoping Tool (SSST)(Permission from Us DoE for UNIDO to translate to Thai)
English, Thai
3.3.2 Steam System Assessment Tool (SSAT) English
3.3.3 Pumping System Assessment Tool (PSAT) English
3.3.4 Fan System Assessment Tool (FSAT) English
4. Financing Energy Efficiency Project
4.1 Presentation
4.1.1 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for financial institutes English, Thai
4.1.2 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries English, Thai
4.2 Guideline
4.2.1 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for financial institutes English, Thai
4.2.2 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries English, Thai
66
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.4 Details of the Awareness Workshops
The details of the awareness workshops is shown in Table e.2.
Table e.2 List of awareness workshops (Target in project document = 500 factory managers)
No. Date Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory
Management Personnel Other Female Male
1 10 Jul 12 Bangkok 16 19 77 24 88 24
2 10 Sep 12 Bangkok 14 16 9 6 33 18
3 25 Sep 13 Bangkok 26 26 23 18 57 28
4 6 Nov 13 Nakhon Ratchasima 13 39 42 8 86 25
5 20 Nov 13 Kanchanaburi 26 44 18 16 72 33
6 27 Nov 13 Rayong 39 52 6 20 77 47
7 15 Sep 14 Khon Kaen 29 2 9 2 38 16
8 29 Sep 14 Songkhla 33 5 6 7 37 21
9 8 Oct 14 Ayutthaya 45 2 20 12 55 19
10 13 Oct 14 Bangkok 64 7 56 15 112 49
11 17 Oct 14 Samut Sakhon 60 3 8 11 60 36
12 26 Jun 15 Prachin Buri 30 22 9 12 49 27
13 23 Jul 15 Ratchaburi 39 22 3 8 56 36
14 27 Aug 15 Surat Thani 22 16 4 6 36 25
15 2 Oct 15 Chiang Mai 32 36 0 12 56 32
16 3 Feb 16 Bangkok 50 29 10 13 76 47
17 7 Apr 16 Nakhon Si Thammarat 38 30 0 18 50 38
18 20 Apr 16 Chonburi 28 34 8 21 49 41
Total 604 404 308 229 1,087
67
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.5 Detail of the EnMS User Training
The details of the EnMS 2-day user training is shown in Table e.3.
Table e.3 List of EnMS 2-day user training (Target in project document = 300 target factories)
No. Date Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory
Target industries
Other Female Male
1 12-13 Jul 12 Bangkok 44 71 30 85 23
2 3-4 Sep 12 Bangkok 58 25 13 70 29
3 18-19 Feb 13 Bangkok 33 20 14 39 18
4 3-4 Jun 13 Chon Buri 54 2 13 43 29
5 26-27 Sep 13 Bangkok 48 12 16 44 23
6 26-27 Feb 14 Bangkok 20 35 13 42 10
7 11-12 Mar 14 Bangkok 22 31 20 33 8
8 14-15 May 14 Rayong 27 28 14 41 11
9 23-24 Jul 14 Bangkok 14 37 15 36 3
10 10-11 Sep 14 Bangkok 11 45 12 44 9
11 24-25 Nov 14 Bangkok 5 16 9 12 5
12 14-15 Jan 15 Bangkok 21 22 14 29 10
13 20-21 May 15 Bangkok 4 34 9 29 4
14 25-26 Jun 15 Nakhon Ratchasima 81 7 17 71 40
15 15-16 Jul 15 Surat Thani 75 13 14 74 39
16 5-6 Aug 15 Bangkok 10 29 11 28 5
17 17-18 Sep 15 Prachin Buri 60 11 11 60 30
18 15-16 Oct 15 Chiang Mai 66 14 20 60 38
19 17-18 Dec 15 Bangkok 28 21 13 36 13
20 17-18 Feb 16 Bangkok 29 23 9 43 16
21 16-17 Mar 16 Ayutthaya 59 2 18 43 28
22 14-15 Jun 16 Bangkok 11 41 14 38 9
23 15-16 Nov 16 Bangkok 7 11 10 8 5
24 15-16 Feb 17 Bangkok 9 4 4 9 6
Total 796 554 333 1,017
68
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.6 Detail of the SO User Training
The details of the SO 2-day user training is shown in Table e.4.
Table e.4 List of SO 2-day user training (Target in project document = 400 factory personnel)
No. Date System Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory
Target industries
Other Female Male
1 31 Jul-1 Aug 12 SSO Bangkok 20 13 2 31 10
2 2-3 Oct 12 PSO Bangkok 29 29 9 49 16
3 6-7 Nov 12 SSO Rayong 35 13 8 40 20
4 27-28 Nov 12 CASO Bangkok 40 35 8 67 28
5 18-19 Mar 13 PSO Bangkok 27 20 4 43 16
6 22-23 Apr 13 SSO Bangkok 17 14 2 29 11
7 20-21 May 13 PSO Ayuthaya 17 6 5 18 5
8 17-18 Jun 13 CASO Bangkok 56 15 3 68 28
9 30-31 Oct 13 SSO Bangkok 46 9 5 50 26
10 17-18 Feb 14 CASO Bangkok 41 14 8 47 26
11 22-23 Apr 14 SSO Bangkok 20 23 5 38 13
12 17-18 Jun 14 CASO Bangkok 19 50 9 60 11
13 1-2 Jul 14 PSO Rayong 52 26 2 76 29
14 21-22 Jul 14 SSO Samut Prakan 33 5 4 34 13
15 28-29 Oct 14 CASO Samut Prakan 72 5 5 72 38
16 2-3 Dec 14 PSO Samut Sakhon 52 3 7 48 26
17 11-12 Dec 14 SSO Bangkok 34 17 3 48 18
18 24-25 Feb 15 FSO Bangkok 9 32 3 38 5
19 2-3 Jun 15 FSO Bangkok 24 17 3 38 13
20 21-22 Sep 15 SSO Chonburi 25 3 2 26 14
21 24-25 Sep 15 CASO Rayong 40 3 2 41 22
22 29-30 Sep 15 PSO Bangkok 30 22 3 49 18
23 11-12 Feb 16 PSO Bangkok 53 13 7 59 18
24 18-19 Feb 16 FSO Bangkok 30 9 4 35 17
25 25-26 Feb 16 SSO Krabi 65 26 13 78 30
26 7-8 Mar 16 CASO Bangkok 47 20 7 60 21
27 12-13 May 16 SSO Samut Prakan 39 16 6 49 17
28 16-17 May 16 CASO Samut Prakan 26 13 5 34 9
29 31 May-1 Jun 16 PSO Bangkok 37 11 6 42 16
30 9-10 Jun 16 SSO Samut Prakan 35 9 1 43 18
31 14-15 Jun 16 CASO Bangkok 56 4 2 58 29
Total 1,126 495 153 1,468
69
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.7 National Experts on EnMS
Table e.5 List of qualified national experts on EnMS
No. Name Status
1 Miss Ajchamapun Kirdsawas Factory personnel
2 Mr. Atthapong Laiudomsin Consultant
3 Miss Bussaba Saelim Government officer
4 Mr. Chakrit Jarrusbussarakam Factory personnel
5 Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd Consultant
6 Mr. Chokchai Anamtawach Consultant
7 Dr. Chonlakarn Wongkhorsub* Consultant
8 Mr. Ekachai Boonchana Factory personnel
9 Mr. Gowit Uttaboon Factory personnel
10 Mr. Jakkarin Nakrai Consultant
11 Ms. Kanchanit Lakhakoon Factory personnel
12 Ms. Kanokkan Imjai Consultant
13 Mr. Kitsanapong Laiuksorn Consultant
14 Mr. Kosid Keawtao Consultant
15 Ms. Manchima Chatsrirung Consultant
16 Miss Nadnicha Sangkate Consultant
17 Ms. Nadtaya Sirisomboon Factory personnel
18 Mr. Nahtorn Arunphu Consultant
19 Mr. Nattapong Thipayawat Factory personnel
20 Mr. Natthapong Suwanasang Government officer
21 Dr. Nopporn Patcharaprakiti Consultant
22 Mr. Nopwarin Duangdee Factory personnel
23 Mr. Nueng Klubtavee Consultant
24 Mr. Paisan Jiranuntarat Consultant
25 Mr. Paisarn Khongphasarnkaln Consultant
26 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich* Consultant
27 Miss Pakawan Kamonchaivanich Factory personnel
28 Mr. Pasakorn Thungkanont Consultant
29 Miss Phanida Chalangsut Consultant
30 Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna Consultant
31 Mr. Phooben Phunwesh Consultant
32 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong* Consultant
33 Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn Consultant
34 Mr. Pitoon Junthip* Consultant
35 Ms. Prarudee Donmok Factory personnel
70
Annex ECapacity Building Program
No. Name Status
36 Mr. Raththa Sricharoen Government officer
37 Dr. Sadudee Supanpai Factory personnel
38 Miss Saipin Tuansawad Consultant
39 Mr. Saran Prabpairin Consultant
40 Mr. Saravut Phayoongtham* Consultant
41 Mr. Sarun Udakarn Government officer
42 Mr. Singhanart Mettakhun* Consultant
43 Mr. Siravit Laocharoenpongsang Factory personnel
44 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul* Consultant
45 Mr. Somchai Pongsaran Consultant
46 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien Consultant
47 Mr. Suporn Kulwattanantachai Consultant
48 Mr. Suradech Phattaravichien Consultant
49 Dr. Sutavadee Techajunta Government officer
50 Mr. Suthat Rattanasakulchon Factory personnel
51 Mr. Sutipong Nakavidhaya Government officer
52 Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Government officer
53 Mr. Terapong Samot Factory personnel
54 Dr. Thanakom Soontornchainacksaeng Consultant
55 Mr. Thanakrit Wangdumrongwong Consultant
56 Mr. Thapakon Mokkaraphan Factory personnel
57 Mr. Thirayu Chaiyasit Factory personnel
58 Mr. Viboolpong Angkhala Factory personnel
59 Mr. Wichein Phachayamai Consultant
60 Miss Witchar Pichainarong Government officer
61 Mr. Woraphot Rattanasaengsakulthai Consultant
62 Mr. Yostana Jintamakul Consultant
Note: * = National trainer
71
Annex ECapacity Building Program
E.8 National Experts on SO
Table e.6 List of qualified national experts on SO
No. Name Status
Steam System
1 Mr. Ampol Somboonphokaphan Project engineer
2 Dr. Atikorn Wongsatanawarid* Consultant
3 Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd Consultant
4 Mr. Khongsit Apiwong Consultant
5 Ms. Manchima Chatsrirung Consultant
6 Mr. Manit Koothanapath Consultant
7 Mr. Nueng klubtavee* Consultant
8 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich Consultant
9 Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna Consultant
10 Mr. Preecha Preedavichit Consultant
11 Mr. Rawit Thaweesub* Consultant
12 Mr. Sayan Pansang Consultant
13 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul* Consultant
14 Dr. Surachai Sanitjai* Consultant
15 Dr. Wasan Yoksenakul* Consultant
16 Miss Wipawan Thammachataree Consultant
17 Mr. Woraphot Rattanasaengsakulthai Consultant
Compressed Air System
18 Dr. Jaytawee Pukrushpan Consultant
19 Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd Consultant
20 Mr. Kitsanapong Laiuksorn Consultant
21 Mr. Kran Rakchareon* Consultant
22 Ms. Manchima Chatsrirung Consultant
23 Miss Nadtaya Sirsomboon Factory personnel
24 Mr. Nueng klubtavee Consultant
25 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich* Consultant
26 Mr. Pasakorn Thungkanont Consultant
27 Mr. Phai Sornsakda Factory personnel
28 Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna Consultant
29 Mr. Tanatid Pongpit Factory personnel
30 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong Consultant
31 Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn Consultant
32 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul Consultant
33 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien* Consultant
72
Annex ECapacity Building Program
No. Name Status
34 Mr. Viboolpong Aungkhala Factory personnel
35 Miss Wanlapa Charoonthum Consultant
36 Mr. Woraphot Rattanasaengsakulthai Consultant
37 Mr. Yongyuth Sroimori Consultant
Pumping System
38 Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd Consultant
39 Mr. Rawit Thaweesub* Consultant
40 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien* Consultant
41 Miss Umpawan Pongsittisak Consultant
42 Dr. Wasan Yoksenakul* Consultant
Fan System
43 Mr. Ampol Somboonphokaphan Project engineer
44 Mr. Nuttawut Chuenarom Project engineer
45 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong Consultant
46 Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna Consultant
47 Mr. Rawit Thaweesub* Consultant
48 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien Consultant
Note: * = National trainer
73
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Annex F
Factories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
74
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
F.1 Factories Implementing EnMs with TISI’s and IEE Project’s Support
Table f.1 List of factories implementing EnMS
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
Certified ISO 50001
1 Royal Can Industries Samut Sakhon Rubber and plastic
Expert training NE’s team
2 PTT Global Chemical Rayong Chemical Expert training NE’s team
3 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nongjok
Bangkok Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
4 Sura Bangyikhan Pathum Thani Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
5 Aeoflex Rayong Rubber and plastic
Expert training NE’s team
6 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
7 Eastern Polypack Rayong Rubber and plastic
Expert training NE’s team
8 Fueng Fu Anant Prachin Buri Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
9 Tong Siang Samut Sakhon Textiles Expert training NE’s team
10 Thai Cold Rolled Steel Sheet (TCRSS)
Prachuap Khiri Khan
Basic metal TLC
Dr.Somchai
11 Thai MFC Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon
12 Thai Pet Resin Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon
13 Theppadungporn Coconut Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage
TLC Dr.Somchai
14 Leed Feed Mill, Saraburi Saraburi Food and beverage
TLC Dr.Somchai
15 Siam Mitsui PTA Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon
16 Siam United Steel Rayong Basic metal TLC Pitoon
17 Thai Pigeon Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic
TLC Dr.Somchai
18 Thai MMA – MMA Plant Rayong Chemical Support program Chokchai
19 Thai MMA – CCS Plant Rayong Chemical Support program Chokchai
20 Cerebos (Thailand) – Lamchabang Chon Buri Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
21 Cerebos (Thailand) – Pinthong Chon Buri Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
22 Innolatex (Thailand) Songkhla Rubber and plastic
Support program Saravut
75
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
23 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Chon Buri Rubber and plastic
Support program Paitoon
24 The Government Pharmaceutical Organization
Pathum Thani Chemical Support program Saravut
25 Lee Feed Mill, Phetchaburi Petchaburi Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
EnMS in placed
26 Sahaviriya Steel Industries Prachuap Khiri Khan
Basic metal Expert training NE’s team
27 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Chachoengsao Basic metal Expert training NE’s team
28 CP-Meiji Saraburi Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
29 Khao C.P. (Wang Dang) Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
30 Kulwong Pathum Thani Chemical Expert training NE’s team
31 Red Bull Distillery (1988) Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
Expert training NE’s team
32 TPI Polene Saraburi Non-metallic Expert training NE’s team
33 British Dispensary (L.P.) Samut Prakan Chemical TLC Dr.Somchai
34 Mahaphant Fiber Cement Lop Buri Non-metallic TLC Dr.Somchai
35 Thai Silicate Chemical Chon Buri Chemical TLC Pitoon
36 Wiik and Hoeglund Chon Buri Rubber and Plastic
TLC Pitoon
37 Thainitrate Rayong Chemical TLC Kosit
38 Ferro (Thailand) Saraburi Chemical TLC Dr.Somchai
39 Tep Kinsho Foods Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
Support program Wichien
40 Thai Ruam Jai Korat Nakhon Ratchasima
Food and beverage
Support program Wichien
41 Sangsom 2 Kanchanaburi Food and beverage
Support program Pisit
42 Nateechai Surat Thani Food and beverage
Support program Krisanapong
43 Korn Thai Ratchaburi Food and beverage
Support program Paisarn
44 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Ratchaburi Chemical Support program Pisit
45 Lactasoy Prachin Buri Food and beverage
Support program Woraphot
46 Charoen Pokphand Produce Lop Buri Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Pisit
76
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
47 The Pet Pathum Thani Rubber and plastic
Support program Paitoon
48 Rianthai Interplas, Bangphli Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic
Support program Saravut
49 Rianthai Interplas, Wellgrow Chachoengsao Rubber and plastic
Support program Saravut
50 Sahathai Printing and Packaging Pathum Thani Pulp and paper Support program Dr.Somchai
Table f.2 Energy savings from the factories implementing EnMS under the project’s support (direct savings)
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
Aeroflex 1 Survey energy saving 428 2172 Optimize Set Point Glycol system B
for fermentation process20 10
Beer thip brewery (1991)
3 Improve Efficiency Biogas Process 30 154 Increasing % Condensate Return 980 935 Replace lights in warehouse 3 2
Charoen Pokphand Foods
6 Fit VSD to boiler fan 14 7.087 Reduce chiller condensing pressure 18 9.088 Reduce unload time of Polisher 662 3359 Reduce leakage in Air compression
system390 198
C.P. Rice10 Energy efficient Air condition
replacement16 8
11 Replace Fluorescent with LED lighting 19 1012 Install VSD in blower system 680 34413 Reduce air compressor pressure
from 8 to 5 bar422 214
14 Improve condensing unit of chillers 348 17615 Improve condensing unit of chilled
and freeze process66 34
Cerebos (Laem Chabang)
16 Reduce load stored in freezer 13 717 Reduce leak from compressed air 72 3718 Better control for CT-600 426 21619 Heat recovery from Condensate 3,160 19320 CIP improvement 12,640 774
Cerebos (Pinthong)
21 Stop using Diaphragm pump 296 15022 Using heat pump to reduce steam
demand from boiler 14,806 906
23 Reduce hot water consumption in CIP Process
13,258 811
Eastern Polypack24 Compressed air leaked improvement 1,760 88925 Chiller improvement 1,030 520
77
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
Fuengfuanant26 Survey energy saving (Elec) 574 29027 Survey energy saving (Thermal) Biogas 23,908
Government Pharmaceutical Organization
28 Increase %RH in production area 390 19829 Change switching period of boiler 384
Innolatex
30 reduce lighting at the walk way 11 631 remodel Gas station n/a n/a32 Install vaporizer 708 4333 Replace fluorescent lamp with LED 3 234 Increase Temp from 24C to 26C
in ET area17 9
Kulwong
35 Replace lights from T8 to LED 34 1836 Reduce operating time of the air
conditioners148 75
37 Reduce pressure of compressed air system
4 2
38 Rotate the heat sink of compressed air system
3 2
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 5)
39 Total Energy Saving in 2014Y 126,000 10,37540 Total Energy Saving in 2015Y 534,000 31,07541 Total Energy Saving in 2016Y 313,000 18,173
Sahaviriya Plate Mill
42 Control operation main motor at leveler 2,416 1,22243 Control time for Turn on/off of motor
hydraulic pump at cooling bed352 0.64
44 Control motor of cooling tower by VSD 172 4945 Install VSD motor for Hot water pump 171 8746 Install High efficiency Air-conditioning 63 3347 Better control for ball rolling process 12,880 6,50648 reduce motor's RPM 204 104
Sahaviriya Steel Industries
49 Reduce discharging temperature of slab to 1240 C (Change operation practice)
160,772 12,404
50 Install high efficiency recuperator at furnace no. 2
339,128 26,249
Surabangyikan
51 Reduce steam in bottle washing process 23,152 1,79252 Install VSD (Variable Speed Drive) 200 kW
for Stack & Bag Filter no.1 Blower 2,444 1,236
53 Changing lighting to LED (150 W to LED 50 W)
236 120
54 Changing transparent roof for bottle plant (reducing using lighting energy)
364 184
55 Improve Incinerator no.1 62,428 4,832
Tep Kinsho Foods56 Reduce Electricity in FREEZER Room 606 30657 Maintenance Split type Air Condition 888 449
Thai MMA58 Install APC system for MMA#2 plant59 Change LED Project 352 17860 Change cooling fan blade 98 50
78
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
Thai Nippon Rubber
61 Install timer for air-conditioned 14 762 Install Cooling Tower Gel Machine 20 1163 Install VSD at Dipping supply pump 42 2264 Preheat Wash water by Condensate water 1,412 713
Thai Ruam Jai Korat
65 Reduce idle of Air Compressor 1 828 41966 Reduce energy intake blower 7251 36 1867 Close reduce fan Cooling 1 cell 68 3568 Reduce the amount of excess air 1,876 7369 Blow-down control 1,986 7770 Preheat air inlet 3,526 136
Tong Siang 71 Survey energy saving (Elec) 454 230
TPI Polene
72 Reduce demand of Compressed air 258 13173 Remove Curve Belt 6.10.02 9 574 Remove Curve Belt 6.10.03 9 575 Remove Curve Belt 7.37 9 5
Total 32,304 1,635,712 124,127
Remark:1. The direct support from the project consisted of the expert training for host facility and candidate plant, the EnMS implementation.2. n/a = not available, the company described what they have done to improve energy efficiency, but they did not provide the quantitative data for calculation. 3. The calculation of the reduction of GHG emission use the following co-efficient. – Emissions Factor for grid electricity : 0.5051 tCO2 /MWh – Emissions Factor for fuel oil : 77.4 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for coal : 94.6 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for natural gas : 56.1 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for LPG : 61.2 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for Biomass : 0.693 tCO2 /ton4. The duration for GHG reduction calculation is from the implementing year to the end of project (2017). For example, a measure implemented in 2015 would be considered for 2 years of direct impact during the IEE project implementation. It has been assumed that the saving would be conservatively counted for 2016 and 2017.
79
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
F.2 Factories with EnMP Implemented
Table f.3 List of factories with EnMP implemented (from survey)
No. Factory Sector
1 A.F.E. Co.,Ltd. Food
2 Actu-Lum Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
3 Aditya Birla Chemicals (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Chemical
4 AeroFlex Co., Ltd. Rubber and plastic
5 Ajinomoto (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
6 Alphatex Industries Co.,Ltd. Textiles
7 Apex Plastech Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
8 Asia Fiber Public Company Limited Chemical
9 Asian Seafoods Coldstorage Co.,Ltd. (Suratthani Branch) Food
10 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works Co.,Ltd. Basic metals
11 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Co.,Ltd Chemical
12 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Co., Ltd Beverage
13 Bergsoe Metals Co., Ltd Basic metals
14 Betagro Holding Co.,Ltd. Food
15 Betagro Public Co.,Ltd. Food
16 British Dispensary (L.P.) Chemical
17 C.P. Meiji Food
18 C.P. Rice Co., Ltd. Food
19 Cardinal Health 222 (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
20 Cargill Meats Thailand Limited Food
21 Cerebos (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Leamchabang Food
22 Cerebos (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Pintong Food
23 Chang Awards (1959) Co.,Ltd. Food
24 Chaodee Modified Starch Co.,Ltd. Food
25 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food
26 Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited ( Cheese Plant) Food
27 Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited ( Saraburi Plant) Food
28 Charoen Pokphand Northeastern Public Co.,Ltd. Food
29 Chef's Choice Foods Manufacturer Co.,Ltd. Food
30 Chiang Mai Beverage Co.,Ltd. Food
31 Chiangmai Frozen Foods Public Co.,Ltd. Food
32 Chusinconcrete Co.,Ltd Non-metallic
33 Comform Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper
34 Cosmos Brewery (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Beverage
35 DIC Graphics (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Chemical
36 DZ Card (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
37 Eastern Polypack Co., Ltd. Certified Rubber and plastic
38 Eiamheng Tapioca Industry Co.,Ltd. Food
80
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Sector
39 Eiamrungruang Industry Co.,Ltd. Food
40 F&N Dairies (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
41 Ferro (Thailand) Chemical
42 Forward Freeland Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
43 Fuengfuanant Co.,Ltd. Beverage
44 G J Steel Public Company Limited Basic metals
45 Giffarine Skyline Laboratory & Health Care Co.,Ltd. Chemical
46 Guangken rubber (Thai southern) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
47 Haad Thip (Suratthani) Public Company Limited Beverage
48 Healthy Bee Co.,Ltd. Food
49 Imco Pack Corporation Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
50 Innolatex (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
51 IPD Packaging Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
52 IRPC Public Company Limited Chemical
53 IRPC Public Company Limited (BTX Plant) Chemical
54 IRPC Public Company Limited (PS Plant) Chemical
55 J-Gourmet Co.,Ltd. Food
56 Jong Stit Co.,Ltd. Textiles
57 Kanchanasingkorn Co.,Ltd. Beverage
58 Kasisuri Co.,LTD Food
59 Khonburi Sugar Public Company Limited Food
60 King Milling (Suratthani) Co.,Ltd. Food
61 Kohler (Thailand) Public Company Limited Non-metallic
62 Korn Thai Co., Ltd. Food
63 Kulthorn Kirby Foundry CO.,LTD Basic metals
64 Kulwong Co., Ltd. Chemical
65 Kurashiki Siam Rubber Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
66 LACTASOY CO.,LTD. Beverage
67 Laiyamas Co.,Ltd. Food
68 Lee Feed Mill (Saraburi) Food
69 Lee Feed Mill Public Co.,Ltd., Food
70 LPN Plate Mill Public Co.,Ltd. Basic metals
71 Lucky Star Weaving Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
72 Magnequench (Korat) Co.,Ltd Basic metals
73 Mahaphant Fiber Cement Non-metallic
74 Maneemongkol Import-Export Co.,Ltd., Rubber and plastic
75 Mead Johnson Nutrition (Thailand) Ltd. Food
76 Modern Dyestuffs & Pigments Co.,Ltd. Chemical
77 MSC PR Two Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
78 Nateechai Co.,Ltd. Beverage
79 Nawarat Patanakarn Public Company Limited Non-metallic
81
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Sector
80 NEP Realty And Industry Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic
81 Nestle (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
82 NEW BIODIESEL CO.,LTD Chemical
83 Nishikawa Tachaplalert Cooper Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
84 Nissen Chemitec (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
85 Nisshin-STC Flour Milling Company Limited Food
86 North East Tapioca Flour Co.,Ltd. Food
87 Nova Steel Co.,Ltd. Basic metals
88 NYC Industry Co.,Ltd Rubber and plastic
89 Oji Label (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic
90 Oji Paper (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper
91 Okamoto Textile (THAILAND) Co.,Ltd. Textiles
92 Osotspa Co.,Ltd. Chemical
93 P.P. TEXTILE PRINTING & DYEING Co.,Ltd. Textiles
94 P.S. Wongcharoen Co.,Ltd. Food
95 PANDS Nakornluang Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic
96 Park Chong Jute Mill Co.,Ltd. Textiles
97 PB Pipe (THAILAND) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
98 Pepsi-Cola (Thai) Trading Co.,Ltd. Food
99 PET Pak CO.,LTD Rubber and plastic
100 Phiphatanakit Textile Co.,Ltd. Textiles
101 Premium Foods Co.,Ltd. Food
102 Primaham (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
103 Prime Product Industry Co.,Ltd. Food
104 PTT Global Chemical Chemical
105 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Branch 2) Chemical
106 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Plant 4) Chemical
107 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Plant12) Chemical
108 PTT Phenol Co.Ltd. Chemical
109 PTT Tank Terminal Co.,Ltd. Chemical
110 Red Bull Distillery (1988) Co., Ltd. Beverage
111 Rianthai Interplas Co.,Ltd bangplee Rubber and plastic
112 Rianthai Interplas Co.,Ltd wellgrow Rubber and plastic
113 Royal Can Industries Rubber and plastic
114 Ruampornmitr Pokphand Co.,Ltd. Food
115 Ruey Tay Fibre Industry Co.,Ltd. Textiles
116 Rung Silp Printing Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper
117 Saha Thai Printing & Packaging Pulp and paper
118 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Basic metals
119 Sahaviriya Steel Industries Basic metals
120 Sampran Weaving Co.,Ltd. Textiles
82
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Sector
121 SangSom Co., Ltd.(SangSom 2) Beverage
122 Sanguan Wongse Industries Co.,Ltd. Food
123 Santiphab Trading Co.,Ltd Food
124 Sermsuk Public Company Limited Beverage
125 Siam Brothers Corp., Ltd Textiles
126 Siam Chemical Industry Co.,Ltd. Chemical
127 Siam Fukoku (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
128 Siam Keeper Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
129 Siam Mitsui PTA Chemical
130 Siam Nawaloha Foundry Co.,Ltd. Basic metals
131 Siam Steel International Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic
132 Siam United Steel Basic metals
133 Siam Yachiyo Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
134 Sriprasit Pharma Co.,Ltd. Chemical
135 Srithai Superware Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic
136 SSDC (Tigertex) Co.,Ltd. Textiles
137 Starcore Co.,Ltd. Basic metals
138 Sumitomo Rubber Thailand Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
139 Surabangyikan Beverage
140 Surapon Nichirei Food Co.,Ltd Food
141 Surat Thani Beverage Company Limited Beverage
142 Suretex Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
143 Tanyarungroengchai Rice Mill (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
144 Tawanna Packaging Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper
145 TCRSS Basic metals
146 Teck Bee Hang (Yang Thai Paktai) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
147 Tep Kinsho Foods Co., Ltd. Food
148 Thai Central Chemical Public Company Limited Chemical
149 Thai Daizo Aerosol Co.,Ltd. Chemical
150 Thai Identity Sugar Factory Co.,Ltd. Food
151 Thai Industries Development Co.,Ltd., Textiles
152 Thai MFC Chemical
153 Thai Mitsuwa Public Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
154 Thai MMA Co., Ltd. CCS Plant Chemical
155 Thai MMA Co., Ltd. MMA Plant Chemical
156 Thai Nam Tapioca Co., Ltd Food
157 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. Rubber and plastic
158 Thai PET Resin Chemical
159 Thai Pigeon Rubber and plastic
160 Thai Polyethylene Co.,Ltd. Plant 1 Chemical
161 Thai Polyethylene Co.,Ltd. Plant 3 Chemical
83
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Sector
162 Thai Polyethylene Co.,Ltd. Plant 7 Chemical
163 Thai Ruam Jai Korat Co., Ltd. Food
164 Thai Silicate Chemical Chemical
165 Thai Stanley Electric Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic
166 Thai Takeda Lace Co., Ltd (Plant1) Textiles
167 Thai Takeda Lace Co., Ltd (Plant2) Textiles
168 Thai Toray Synthetics Company Limited Chemical
169 Thai Union Frozen Products Public Company Limited Food
170 Thai Wah Starch Public Company Limited Food
171 Thaifoods Group Public Company Limited Food
172 Thainamthip Manufacturing Co.,Ltd Food
173 Thainitrate Chemical
174 Thaitallow And Oil Co.,Ltd. Food
175 Thanapakdi Co.,Ltd. Beverage
176 The CPAC roof tile Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic
177 The Government Pharmaceutical Organization Chemical
178 THE PET CO.,LTD. Rubber and plastic
179 The Siam White cement Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic
180 Theppadungporn Coconut Food
181 Tia Ngee Hiang (Chao Sua) Co.,Ltd. Food
182 Tipco Asphalt Public Company Limited Non-metallic
183 Tokai Eastern Rubber (Thailand), Ltd. Rubber and plastic
184 Tong-Siang Co.,Ltd. Textiles
185 TPI Polene Public Company Limited Non-metallic
186 TPN FlexPak Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper
187 Trio Plastic Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
188 U.R. Chemical Co,.ltd. Chemical
189 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry, Ltd. Chemical
190 Unichamp Co.,Ltd. Food
191 United Farmer & Industry Co.,Ltd. Food
192 United Paper Public Company Limited Pulp and paper
193 Vara Food & Drink Co.,Ltd. Food
194 Vinythai Public Company Limited Chemical
195 Von Bundit CO., LTD Rubber and plastic
196 Wiik and Hoeglund Rubber and plastic
197 Y.T.Rubber Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic
198 Yakult (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food
199 Yan Wal Yun Corporation Group Co.,Ltd. Food
200 Yearrakarn Co.,Ltd. Food
84
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Table f.4 Energy savings measures implemented according to EnMP in placed (indirect savings)
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Alphatex Industries1 Install reflection panel at lighting 74 37
2 Reschedule Supply-Return operation 438 222
3 insulation improvement 612 33
4 Change old injection no. 7 to All Electric Injection Machine
386 195
Apex Plastech
5 Change old injection no. 13 to All Electric Injection Machine
324 164
6 Change old injection no. 14 to All Electric Injection Machine
324 164
7 Change Fluorescent T8 to LED 150 76
8 Clean 2 condensing unit 600 303
Asia Fiber 9 Insulation improvement 844 47
10 Fix steam trap leaks 212 12
11 Install VSD of Fan of motor No.1 278 141
12 Install VSD of Fan of motor No.2 278 141
Bergsoe Metals 13 Change new burner at Furnace 1 2,886 223
14 Change new burner at Furnace 2 2,886 223
Betagro
15 Compressed air system efficiency improvement
48 24
16 Change new roof sheet Which the sunlight can pass through
60 30
Betagro Holding17 Install VSD controller to air compressor 116 58
18 Install Economizer 5,424 342
Charoen Pokphand Foods (Saraburi Plant)
19 Install high efficiency motor (315 kW) n/c n/c
20 Install high efficiency motor (250 kW) n/c n/c
21 Mini Pellet Mill n/c n/c
22 Improve combustion chamber at boiler 1 n/c n/c
23 Fix the combustion chamber n/c n/c
24 Air-compressor system 3 1
25 reduce set point of air compressor 7 3
Chusinconcrete26 Improve Power factor value by install
Capacitor22 11
27 Improve power factor of transformer 33 17
28 Improve power factor of EVG motor 94 48
29 Improve power factor of concrete cutter motor
42 21
85
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Forward Freeland 30 install VSD controller to air compressor (100 hp)
220 111
31 Change Fluorescent to LED 20 10
32 Change lighting system from 400 W to LED 18 W
48 25
33 Install new air conditioner 12,000 Btu 4 2
34 Reduce leakage 24 12
G J Steel 35 Reduce compressed air set point 656 331
Giffarine Skyline Laboratory & Health Care
36 Adjust cooling water flow rate 123 62
37 Adjust chiller schedule 65 33
38 Reduce steam working pressure (Boiler) 206 15
Haad Thip (Suratthani)
39 Change Hibay to LED 61 31
40 Condensate recovery 303 19
Imco Pack Corporation
41 Change Ventilation fan to Evaporative Cooling System
1,340 677
42 Change Water Cool Chiller to Air Cool Chiller
1,633 825
43 VSD Control for Cooling Pump 618 312
IPD Packaging 44 Change Fluorescent to LED 16 W @4,350 unit
229 116
IRPC (BTX Plant) 45 Heat integration of Unit100 & 400 at BTX Plant
186,537 10,464
46 Cooling tower improvement 331 167
Kanchanasingkorn
47 Change Fluorescent to LED 60 30
48 Change Distillery system from direct to indirect
1,314 102
49 Install 2nd plate heat exchanger 1,001 77
King Milling (Suratthani)
50 Productivity improvement : reduce energy usage
416 23
51 Maintenance air-compressor 202 102
52 Switch off light during lunch break 492 249
Kohler (Thailand) 53 Measure combustion efficiency at AHU Plant no. 1-7
5,064 284
54 Pre-heat the air at Plant 5 3,798 213
55 Reduce running hours from 13 hours to 11 hours
1,688 95
86
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
LPN Plate Mill Public
56 Reduce pressure set point on shut down period
66 33
57 Reduce electrical consumption of lighting system
2 1
58 Reduce air-conditioner consumption in canteen
14 7
59 Reduce Motor Exhaust Blower usage 132 67
60 Reduce energy consumption at start-up reheat furnace
5,012 388
61 Change new method to control temperature at oven
83,518 6,464
Lucky Star Weaving
62 change bulb 250W to LED Low Bay 150W
126 63
63 Reduce operation time of Conversion Machine
306 155
64 Reduce compressed air leakage 270 137
MSC PR Two65 Use 7.5 kW air compressor for 37 kw
in night time112 56
66 Change Fluorescent to LED 22 11
Nawarat Patanakarn 67 Reduce office electrical consumption 86 43
New Biodiesel 68 Insulation improvement 4,438 243
Nissen Chemitec 69 install new LED 428 216
70 Change to new LED 126 63
71 Change Hibay to LED Hibay 200W 136 69
NYC Indusrtry72 Change T8 46W to Induction Lamp 120W 4 2
73 Change Flood Light 400W to 200W 12 6
74 Change 200W to 120W bulb 10 5
Okamoto Textile75 Change Fluorescent to LED 18 Watt 1,238 625
76 Insulation improvement at plant 4 376 29
77 Change Fluorescent to LED 198 100
Premium Foods78 Energy reduction activity at lunch break 268 135
79 Energy reduction in compressed air system
172 87
80 Change fuel from LPG to Biomass 5,654 357
Prime Product Industry
81 Reduce energy consumption of Highbay lighting
31 15
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 2)
82 Repair Instrument air leakage 525 265
83 A-110A/B operating time optimization 357 180
84 P-205 Impeller coating 51 25
87
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 4)
85 change new type of air compressor 552 279
86 stop A-0301 142 72
87 adjust load C-0302,C-0881 during TRSD 1 0.38
88 Add BRS Supply -8 to -7 80 40
89 stop A-0201 and A-0221 in TRS period 1 0.38
90 EPP-steam-1: Bring crude HX to purify at T-1704 by pass through T-1703
266 15
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 12)
91 ERP-Elec-1:Change new type of Air Compressor
522 264
PTT Phenol 92 Reduce power consumption at refrigeration unit
263 133
93 Reduce NG consumption at flare 3,329 187
94 Reduce Steam consumption at Dipp column
6,068 340
Ruey Tay Fibre Industry
95 Change 36W fluorescent @100 unit 32 16
Siam Chemical Industry
96 Reduce compressed-air leakage 48 24
97 Improve air-conditioner ventilation 50 25
98 install automatic valve 240 121
99 Reduce chiller cooling water flow 46 24
100 Control cooling water flow for production 574 290
101 insulation improvement at hot oil and Steam pipe
290 16
102 Change new Burner of hot oil heater 1,544 87
Siam Nawaloha Foundry
103 improve air-compressor system 40 20
104 Set running order of air compressor to match with production demand
466 236
Siam Steel International
105 Change mercury lighting to Fluorescent lighting
102 51
106 Change Fluorescent to LED 4 2
107 Turn off air conditioner at lunch break 16 8
Siam Yachiyo
108 change to LED 20 10
109 Install Air Knife + Blower 176 89
110 Insulate Barel injection machine 220 ton, 180 ton
6 3
111 Improve Air supply system for Production1
152 76
Surapon Nichirei Food
112 Reschedule Air Housing Unit on-off time 74 38
113 Adjust compressor of chiller 36 18
114 Improve cooling tower/Condenser system 144 73
115 reduce steam leakage 0 3,944 249
116 Change the lighting system to LED 342 173
88
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Surat Thani Beverage
117 Insulation improvement at boiler 14 1
118 Heat pump 1,040 81
119 Heat recovery from hot water 106 54
Suretex 120 centralize all the chillers to make a common chiller water system
5,502 2,779
121 Improvement oven insulation 48 25
Thai Daizo Aerosol 122 Reduce electrical consumption 302 153
123 Replace new cooling fan (W-7951A,B) 880 444
Thai PolyethylenePlant 1
124 Combine HDPE#4/PP#3 air compressor system
2,796 1,412
125 Modified line CW at SL cooler to reduce CW usage
212 107
126 Optimize C-3301 Load 2,484 1,255
Thai Polyethylene Plant 3
127 Single slurry cooler of both reactors H1000P grade
132 66
128 Reduce temperature at ethylene preheater (30 to 23 C)
2,008 113
129 Reduce reflux ratio of distillation columnT-5703 (25 to 20%)
15,660 879
130 Reduce temp ethylene preheater (from 30 to 23C)
4 0.18
131 Mass Color 5,814 2,936
132 C-502, C-503A/B Install pressure transmitter (Suction Filter)
260 131
133 VVVF to optimize electrical consumption for C901
146 74
134 Reduce power consumption by pump coating (P1300A/B/C)
190 96
Thai Polyethylene Plant 7
135 C-2502, C-2503A/B Install pressure transmitter (Suction Filter)
284 143
136 VVVF to optimize electrical consumption for C2901
190 96
137 Increase LS flash steam from D851 from modification
4,422 248
138 Reduce Steam consumption of degassing purge air heater by using ambient temperature purge air part reduce time hot purge
626 35
Thai Takeda Lace (13131)
139 Change to LED 18 watt @1,100 unit 148 75
Thai Takeda Lace (13999)
140 Change Fluorescent to LED 608 307
89
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Thai Toray Synthetics
141 Improve compressor and cooling tower of chiller
700 354
142 Install Solar cell 10 kwp + Change to LED 18 watt bulb
18 9
143 Change Fluorescent to LED 220 111
144 Reduce suction pressure to Compressor 524 265
145 Install Chiller automatic control 3,950 1,996
Thai Union Frozen Products
146 Ball cleaning 94 48
147 Change to LED 20W Plant Fish 2 524 265
148 Install Hibay LED 150W 36 18
149 Booster pump SCM 1,782 900
150 Install Economizer C3 4,154 393
Thaifoods Group
151 Change T8 to LED 14 W 318 161
152 Washing machine change energy source from electricity to steam and Clothes dryers from Gas to Steam
116 6
Thanapakdi
153 Install new high efficiency Heat Exchanger
2,494 193
154 Fix Steam Tap and change new By Pass valve
170 13
155 Condensate recovery 800 62
156 Reduce working hours of Milling machine 384 194
157 Install timer to turn-on and turn-off electrical Heater clamp
52 27
Tipco Asphalt158 Cancel a transformer 500 KVA 22 11
159 Change lighting system from 3 Units to 2 Units (36W each)
8 4
160 Install new air conditioner total 16 units 80 41
161 Reduce running hours of milling machine 798 62
Tokai Eastern Rubber (Thailand)
162 Chang street light to LED 36 18
163 Chang to LED bulb 424 215
U.R. Chemical164 Reduce leakage 20 10
165 Control blowdown rate of air dryer 0.44 0.22
Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry
166 Change to high efficiency motors 72 36
167 Change Fluorescent to LED 83 42
United Farmer & Industry
168 Control production process 23 kWh/Tc 2,450 1,238
90
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Y.T.Rubber
169 Improve Waste Water Treatment Plant Electrical Consumption
80 41
170 Reduce free-run of machine 202 102
171 Improve lighting control 22 11
172 Adjust control valve at Burner of Dryer 3,326 210
Total 50,427 363,262 48,315
Remark:1. The factory personnel attended the 2-day user trainings and applied the knowledge to improve their energy usage.2. n/a = not available. The company described what they have done to improve energy efficiency, but they did not provide the quantitative data for calculation. n/c = not count. The company implemented energy efficiency measures in 2017. Therefore, the savings per year are shown, but the total savings are not counted.3. The calculation of the reduction of GHG emission use the following co-efficient. – Emissions Factor for grid electricity : 0.5051 tCO2 /MWh – Emissions Factor for fuel oil : 77.4 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for coal : 94.6 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for natural gas : 56.1 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for LPG : 61.2 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for Biomass : 0.693 tCO2 /ton4. The duration for GHG reduction calculation is from the implementing year to the end of project (2017). For example, a measure implemented in 2015 would be considered for 2 years of direct impact during the IEE project implementation. It has been assumed that the saving would be conservatively counted for 2016 and 2017.
91
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
F.3 Factories Implementing SO with DIP’s and IEE Project’s Support
Table f.5 List of system optimization assessment
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
Steam System
1 Ampol Food Processing Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage
Expert training Preecha
2 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nongjok
Bangkok Food and beverage
Expert training Manit
3 Krungthai Feedmill, Prapadang
Samut Prakan Food and beverage
Expert training Dr.Atikorn
4 Thai Union Frozen Products Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
Expert training Rawit
5 Surabangyikan Pathum Thani Food and beverage
Expert training Dr.Paitoon
6 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training Dr.Wasan
7 Tong Siang (Palm Shell) Samut Sakhon Textiles Expert training Dr.Surachai
8 Thai Containers Group Chon Buri Pulp and paper
Expert training Khongsit
9 IRPC Rayong Chemical Expert training Dr.Somchai
10 Thai Toray Synthetics Bangkok Chemical Expert training Manchima
11 Hwafong Rubber Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic
Expert training Nueng
12 CPRAM Pathum Thani Food and beverage
Expert training Phongjaroon
13 Suksomboon Palm Oil Chon Buri Food and beverage
Expert training Sayan
14 Kanayama Kasei Chon Buri Rubber and plastic
Expert training Wipawan
15 Thai Asia Rice Product Prae Food and beverage
Expert training Yongyuth*
16 MMP International Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
Expert training Woraphot
17 F&N Dairies Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training Chirasak
18 Chan Cha Rern Foam Ayutthaya Rubber and plastic
Expert training Ampol
19 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Ratchaburi
Ratchaburi Food and beverage
TEM Nueng
20 Thai Tallow and Oil, Saikherng
Surat Thani Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Surachai
21 Thai Tallow and Oil, Bangsawan
Surat Thani Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Atikorn
22 Taksinpalm (2521) Surat Thani Food and beverage
TEM Rawit
23 Palm Tongkum Surat Thani Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Wasan
92
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
24 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Mahachai
Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
TEM Nueng
25 Friendship Corn Starch Samut Prakan Food and beverage
TEM Phongjaroon
26 Thai Nisshin Seifun Samut Prakan Food and beverage
TEM Chirasak
27 Premier Canning Industry Samut Prakan Food and beverage
TEM Chirasak
28 Surapon Foods Samut Prakan Food and beverage
TEM Chirasak
29 Friesland Campina Fresh Bangkok Food and beverage
TEM Phongjaroon
30 Chumpol Food Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage
TEM Phongjaroon
31 Cosmos Brewery Ayutthaya Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Paitoon
32 JBF Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage
TEM Phongjaroon
33 K.R.S. Spicy Food Pathum Thani Food and beverage
TEM Chirasak
34 Asian Superior Foods Ratchaburi Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Paitoon
35 Monkey King Food Pathum Thani Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Paitoon
36 Tong Siang (Wood pallet) Samut Sakhon Textiles Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
37 Otaco Trang Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
38 Chumporn Palm Oil Chumphon Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
39 Pitak Palm Trang Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
40 Kean Chareon Kamphaeng Phet Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
41 Kaset Thai International Nakhon Sawan Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
42 Rajburi Sugar Ratchaburi Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
43 Samo Thong Palm 2 Surat Thani Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
44 Nam Hong Palm Oil Krabi Food and beverage
Biomass boiler study
Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan
45 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry
Samut Prakan Chemical Support program Dr.Atikorn
46 Atimart Buri Ram Food and beverage
Support program Phongjaroon
47 Cerebos Chon Buri Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
93
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
Compressed Air System
48 Ampol Food Processing Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage
Expert training Dr.Jaytawee Suchai
49 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nongjok
Bangkok Food and beverage
Expert training Dr .Pa i toon Kran Manchima
50 Apex Plastech Bangkok Rubber and plastic
Expert training Passakorn
51 Hwafong Rubber Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic
Expert training Nueng
52 BS Metal Chachoengsao Basic metal Expert training Dr.Pisit
53 Eastern Polypack (plant no.3)
Rayong Rubber and plastic
Expert training Kritsanapong
54 Eastern Polypack (plant no.2)
Rayong Rubber and plastic
Expert training Viboolpong Nadtaya Tanatid Phai
55 Aeroflex Rayong Rubber and plastic
Expert training PhongjaroonWoraphot
56 F&N Dairies Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training Chirasak Pis-it
57 Red Bull 1988 Samut Sakhon Food and beverage
Expert training Yongyuth
58 PTTGC Rayong Chemical Expert training Dr.Somchai
59 Thai Nippon Rubber Chon Buri Rubber and plastic
TEM Manchima
60 CPRAM, Ladkrabang Bangkok Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Paitoon
61 Thai Glico Ratchaburi Food and beverage
TEM Dr.Paitoon
62 Thai Better Foods Pathum Thani Food and beverage
TEM Chirasak
63 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Ban Bueng
Chon Buri Food and beverage
TEM Suchai
64 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nong Khae
Saraburi Food and beverage
TEM Suchai
65 Ajinomoto Samut Prakan Food and beverage
TEM Suchai
66 National Starch and Chemical
Rayong Food and beverage
Support program Wanlapa
67 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Support program Pisit
68 Songkla Canning Songkhla Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
69 Cerebos Chon Buri Food and beverage
Support program Dr.Somchai
94
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel
National Expert
Pumping System
70 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works, Direct cooling line
Samut Prakan Basic metal Expert training Chirasak Suchai
71 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works, Indirect cooling line
Samut Prakan Basic metal Expert training Rawit Dr.Wasan Umpawan
72 PI Industry Rayong Rubber and plastic
TEM Chirasak
73 Creative Polymers Rayong Rubber and plastic
TEM Suchai
Fan System
74 Thai Ruam Jai Vegetable Oil, System no. 1
Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training Phongjaroon
75 Thai Ruam Jai Vegetable Oil, System no. 2
Ayutthaya Food and beverage
Expert training Pisit Suchai Ampol Nuttawut
76 Siam Cement Group, Ta Luang
Saraburi Non-metallic Expert training Rawit
Note: *Mr. Yongyuth did not pass the SSO expert exam, but his report has been supervised and approved by the international experts.
Table f.6 Energy savings from the factories conducting system optimization assessment under the project’s support (direct savings)
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
Aeroflex 1 Reduce System Leakage 304 154
Ampol Food Processing
2 Steam leak maintenance program 972 40
3 Reduce leakage (Compressed Air) 750 379
Apex Plastech
4 Reduce leakage 524 265
5 Air Compressor Sequence Control System 580 293
6 Install high efficiency air compressor 130 66
7 Reduce Air inlet Temperature 736 373
Beer thip brewery (1991)
8 Change boiler's fuel to Bituminous coal n/a n/a
9 Condensate return improvement n/a n/a
10 Reduce leakage in the system 81 41
BS Metal 11 Reduce leakage 52 27
12 Insulation improvement 232 12
Chan Cha Rern Foam 13 Fix Steam trap n/a n/a
14 Clean boiler combustion room n/a n/a
Charoen Pokphand Foods (Mahachai Plant)
15 Increase Condensate Recovery 1.76 0.17
16 Decrease Blow down 0.20 0.02
95
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
Charoen Pokphand Foods (Nongjok Plant)
17 Reduce leakage 1,130 571
18 Link all compressor houses by new piping and install new VSD Air Compressor.
374 190
19 Reduce temperature at compressor house 36 19
Charoen Pokphand Foods (Saraburi Plant)
20 Leak reduction 260 131
Cosmos 21 change boiler blow down rate 1,250 97
CP Ram 22 Feedwater Economizer 3,568 276
CP Ram (Ladkrabang plant)
23 Leak reduction 20 10
Eastern Polypack (Plant No.2)
24 Reduce Compressor Inlet Temperature (From 36.7 C to 35.5 C )
46 24
25 Reduce Generation Pressure from 8.2 Bars to 7.90 Bars
112 57
Eastern Polypack (Plant No.3)
26 Change Compressor Running Order 584 255
27 Reduce System Leakage 2,542 1,285
F&N Dairies
28 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
29 Reduce blowdown rate n/a n/a
30 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a
31 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
32 Reduce steam leak n/a n/a
33 Steam trap fix n/a n/a
34 Reduce pressure (2015) 80 41
Friendship Corn StarchFriesland Campina
35 Reduce System Leakage (2015) 72 37
36 Leak reduction (2016) 67 34
37 Decrease Blow down 0.25 0.02
38 Decrease Blow down rate 195 15
39 Improve feed water quality (RO system) n/a n/a
Hwafong Rubber (Thailand)
40 Reduce leakage on 6 bars line 156 79
41 Reduce leakage on 8 bars line 796 403
42 Reduce leakage on 18 bars line 268 136
43 Change to high efficient air compressor 2,620 1,324
IRPC 44 Develop prosteam for real time monitoring their system
n/a n/a
JBF 45 Decrease Blow down 240 15
Kanayama Kasei 46 Improve Insulation 308 17
Monkey King Food47 improve steam leak 27 2
48 change boiler blow down rate 108 7
National Starch & Chemical
49 Switch off one set of instrument 's air dryer 74 38
50 Reduce System Leakage 240 122
51 Compressor control on trim compressor 186 95
96
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction
MWh GJ
PI Industry 52 Trim pump impeller 246 125
Premier Canning Industry
53 steam leaks maintenance programs 925 88
Red Bull 198854 Reduce System Leakage 204 104
55 Reduce Generation Pressure 16 8
Surabangyikan
56 Excess air reduction. 37,240 2,883
57 blow-down rate reduction 47,588 3,683
58 Steam leak maintenance program 38,526 2,982
Thai Containers Group59 Fine tune %O2 (Yearly Service by Supplier) 4,788 371
60 Install insulation on naked pipe 410 32
Thai Union Frozen Products
61 Clean boiler heat transfer surfaces – boiler B1 and B7
2,204 171
62 Install Economizer on boiler No. C3 6,510 504
63 PRV control : Fluctuating load reduction n/a n/a
64 TDS control : Control blowdown rate n/a n/a
65 Steam trap maintenance program n/a n/a
The Bangkok Iron and Steel Work
66 Turn Off the pump 44 23
Tong Siang
67 Installed VSD controller 532 269
68 Survey energy saving (Thermal) Palm Shell n/a n/a
69 Fine tune %O2 15,180 623
70 Return condensate 33,502 1,374
71 Improve steam trap leaks and machine leakage
8,652 355
UENO Fine Chemical
72 Install New boiler & Economizer 24,318 1,364
73 Reduce blowdown rate 194 11
74 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
Total 13,862 226,939 21,897
97
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
F.4 Factories Implementing SO by sending the personnel to attend SO trainings
Table f.7 Energy savings measures implemented by the factories sending their personnel to attend SO trainings (indirect savings)
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Aditya Birla Chemicals1 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a
2 Install high efficiency motor n/a n/a
Air Liquide Thailand 3 Installed VSD controller 296 150
Bangkok Alcohol Industrial
4 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a
5 Reduce leakage n/a n/a
Bangkok Iron and Steel Works
6 Install ring-loop pipe n/a n/a
7 Install sequence controller n/a n/a
8 Use high efficiency air compressor n/a n/a
Cardinal Health 222 9 Use high efficiency motor 584 296
10 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
Carpets International Thailand
11 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
12 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a
13 Reduce excess air 1,516 96
Cerebos (Pinthong plant)
14 Reduce boiler's working hours 2,721 172
15 Reduce stream pressure 109 7
16 Improve productivity at Retort process 157 10
17 Improve productivity by reduce heating time
601 38
18 Improve Insulation 136 9
Cosmos Brewery 19 Reduce excess air 9,052 856
CP-Meiji20 Improve efficiency : reduce fuel usage 18,526 1,039
21 Install VSD air compressor 459 232
CPRAM 22 Installed VSD controller 130 66
East Water23 Set running sequence by selecting
high efficiency pump firstn/a n/a
24 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a
25 Install high efficiency motor n/a n/a
26 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
Fuengfuanant
27 Improve Insulation n/a n/a
28 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a
29 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
30 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a
31 Reduce leakage 59 30
98
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Interprofile 32 Reduce inlet air temperature n/a n/a
33 Reduce compressed air working pressure 10 5
34 Install VSD air compressor 17 9
Kimberly-Clark 35 Change new 2 air compressors 632 320
Kohler (Thailand)
36 Reduce leakage 1,058 535
37 Reduce compressed air working pressure
350 177
38 Use booster device at the high pressure with low demand process
117 59
39 Install sequence controller 899 454
40 Install VSD air compressor 95 48
Krabi vegetable oil 41 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
Kurashiki Siam Rubber
42 Reduce leakage 77 39
43 Reduce inlet air temperature 97 49
44 Reduce compressed air working pressure
82 42
Map Ta Phut Olefins 45 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
MC Towa International Sweeteners
46 Installed VSD controller 276 140
National Starch & Chemical
47 Fix the impeller pump (Wearing condition)
62 31
Polyfoam Kabinburi
48 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
49 Improve Insulation n/a n/a
50 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a
51 Fix Steam traps n/a n/a
Pramuanphol 52 Install VSD air compressor 15 8
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 2)
53 Blowdown rate reduction 4 0.22
PTT Global Chemical (Plant 4)
54 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
55 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a
56 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
PTT Phenol 57 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a
58 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a
PTT Rayong Gas Separation Plant
59 Reduce flowrate by trim impeller 1,860 939
60 Optimize pumping system 2,580 1,303
61 Non-Metallic Wear ring 14 8
Sahathai Printing and Packaging
62 Fix Steam leaks 28 2
63 Change fuel from Fuel Oil to LPG n/a n/a
99
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
Sahaviriya Steel Industries
64 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
65 Improve Insulation n/a n/a
66 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a
Siam Coated Abrasive 67 Condensate recovery 250 14
Siam Mitsui PTA 68 Turn-off one pump (Over demand) 282 142
Thai MMA 69 Reduce inlet air temperature 8 4
Thai Styrenics 70 Use high efficiency air compressor 0.50 0.26
Thai Nippon Rubber Industry
71 Reduce excess air 8 0.54
72 Condensate recovery 964 61
Thai Polyethylene 73 Combine HDPE#4/PP#3 air compressor system
1,398 706
74 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
75 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
76 Improve Insulation n/a n/a
Thai Ruam Jai Korat77 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
78 Pre-heat air before supply to combustion chamber
n/a n/a
79 Reduce stream pressure n/a n/a
80 Fine tune %O2 n/a n/a
Thai Silicate Chemical81 Reduce Natural gas at Furnace E and F 3 0.3
82 Reduce Natural gas at Drying Process 684 38
Thai United Awa Paper
83 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
84 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
85 Reduce inlet air temperature n/a n/a
86 Reduce compressed air working pressure n/a n/a
87 Use high efficiency air compressor n/a n/a
88 Install VSD air compressor n/a n/a
Thai-German Ceramic Industry
89 Installed VSD controller 270 137
The Siam Construction Steel
90 Reduce water consumption 2,000 1,010
91 Reduce leakage 810 410
92 Reduce inlet air temperature 46 24
TPI Polene
93 Fix Expansion Joint and cracked tube at Tertiary air duct 1
141,481 13,384
94 Fix Expansion Joint and cracked tube at Tertiary air duct 2
153,034 14,477
95 Fix Expansion Joint and cracked tube at Tertiary air duct 3
161,326 15,262
100
Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization
Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ
United Winery and Distillery
96 Condensate recovery 642 196
97 Reduce leakage 38 19
USAM Inter group 98 Use booster device at the high pressure with low demand process
12 6
99 Install ring-loop pipe 80 41
100 Reduce excess air n/a n/a
101 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a
Utopian102 Improve Insulation n/a n/a
103 Condensate recovery n/a n/a
104 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a
105 Fix Steam traps n/a n/a
Total 14,714 491,242 53,102
101
Annex GCase Study
Annex G
Case Study
102
Annex GCase Study
G.1 Case Study
Table g.1 List of case study
No. Factory Sector Topic
1 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food EnMS
2 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Basic metal EnMS
3 C.P. Rice Food EnMS
4 Aeroflex Rubber EnMS
5 Eastern Polypack Plastic EnMS
6 Cerebos Food EnMS
7 Tong Siang Textiles EnMS
8 Thai MMA Chemical EnMS
9 Kulwong Chemical EnMS
10 Innolatex Rubber EnMS
11 FuengFuAnant Beverage EnMS
12 Beer Thip Beverage EnMS
13 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food CASO
14 Aeroflex Rubber EnMS
15 Eastern Polypack Plastic CASO
16 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry Food SSO
17 F&N Dairies Food SSO
18 Tong Siang Textiles SSO
19 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Chemical EnMS
20 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Rubber EnMS
21 FuengFuAnant Beverage SSO
22 Lee Feed Mill Food SSO
23 Thai Union Frozen Products Food SSO
24 Chan Charoen Plastic SSO
25 Apex Plastech Plastic CaSO
103
Annex GCase Study
(add case studies 25 cases) 1
104
Annex GCase Study
105
Annex GCase Study
3
106
Annex GCase Study
107
Annex GCase Study
5
108
Annex GCase Study
109
Annex GCase Study
7
110
Annex GCase Study
111
Annex GCase Study
9
112
Annex GCase Study
113
Annex GCase Study
11
114
Annex GCase Study
115
Annex GCase Study
13
116
Annex GCase Study
117
Annex GCase Study
15
118
Annex GCase Study
119
Annex GCase Study
17
120
Annex GCase Study
121
Annex GCase Study
19
122
Annex GCase Study
123
Annex GCase Study
21
124
Annex GCase Study
125
Annex GCase Study
23
126
Annex GCase Study
127
Annex GCase Study
25
128
Annex GCase Study
G.2 Fact Sheet
Table g.2 List of fact sheet
No. Factsheet Topic
1 Why would you implement an EnMS? EnMS
2 Guidelines for biomass boiler’s efficiency improvement measures EnMS
129
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
Annex H
Self-learning Courses
130
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
H.1 Energy Management System Self-Learning Course
To develop the course materials, the project followed the process shown in Figure 4.4, which includes focus group meeting, review of existing materials, questionnaire survey, preparation of draft materials, review by lecturers, and preparation of final materials.
(2-3 pages)
131
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
132
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
133
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
H.2 Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course
Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course for Industrial Sector
There are six chapters in the training course for the industrial sector. The details of each chapter are shown below.
- Chapter 1 - Energy situation in Thailand: Thailand energy situation and the relevant policies have been described in this chapter.
- Chapter 2 - Energy conservation measures by industrial sector: The overview and characteristics of energy use in the industry are explained. Then, the energy saving potential and its examples are illustrated. Several case studies on the consideration of energy efficiency projects are also included to provide the guidance and consideration factors when evaluating a project. The last section of the chapter describes the life cycle cost concept together with an example of how to calculate life cycle cost.
- Chapter 3 - Financial sources of energy conservation projects: The chapter starts by describing the different types of energy savings project in the industry and highlighting the difference between energy efficiency projects and renewable energy projects. In the next section, the various financial sources are described such as funding schemes provided by agencies under the Ministry of Energy, and the energy-related financial products offered by the major banks in Thailand.
- Chapter 4 - Loan system of commercial banks in Thailand: In addition to their own financial resources, the factories, especially SMEs, may take up loans from commercial banks in Thailand to implement their energy efficiency project. The chapter provides an overview of the credit approval and under- writing process. The general credit underwriting tools including the 5C’s of credit and criteria are explained to increase the factory personnel’s understanding of the requirements for successful loan approval.
- Chapter 5 - Business information required for credit underwriting of banks: The key information required for preparing a classic business plan is explained in detail. This type of business plan is typically required by the bank for their consideration and approval of loans.
- Chapter 6 - Financial feasibility study: The chapter walks the audience through the 2 steps of developing a project financial feasibility study. In the first step, the financial projection of the “before implementation” and “when implementing energy efficiency project” is explained. The second step, assessment of financial feasibility, consists of assessment of financial return and assessment of ability to replay loan (solvency) are explained. The description, equation, and examples are provided to show the audience how to calculate the key parameters themselves.
134
Annex HSelf-learning Courses
Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course for Financial Institutions
There are five chapters in the training course and the details of each chapter are shown below.
- Chapter 1 - Energy situation in Thailand: Thailand energy situation and the relevant policies are described in this chapter.
- Chapter 2 - Financial mechanisms to support energy efficiency projects: The chapter starts by describing the different types of energy savings project in the industry and highlighting the difference between energy efficiency projects and renewable energy projects. The various financial sources are described such as the funding schemes provided by agencies under the Ministry of Energy, and the energy-related financial products offered by the major banks in Thailand. The last section shows oversea examples of financial products to support energy efficiency projects, which consist of LEAP, Siemens energy efficiency financing, green bank, green for growth fund, property assessed clean energy (PACE), clean energy finance corporation (CEFC), loan loss reserve (LLR), loan guarantee, energy efficiency cluster, the utility bill as a loan repayment mechanism, and EBRD regional energy efficiency program (REEP).
- Chapter 3 - Energy conservation measures by industrial sector: The overview and characteristics of energy use in the industry are explained. Then, the energy saving potential and its examples are illustrated. Several case studies on the consideration of energy efficiency projects are also included to provide guidance and consideration factors for the evaluating of projects.
- Chapter 4 - Energy saving measurement and verification (M&V): The chapter is based on the International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol (IPMVP). The objectives, scope and benefits of energy saving M&V are described. The overview of frequently used options for energy saving M&V is also provided. The last section of the chapter describes the life cycle cost concept as well as how to calculate the life cycle cost.
- Chapter 5 - Assessment of EE project financial feasibility: the financial projection of the “before implementation” and “when implementing energy efficiency project” is explained. Apart from the NPV, IRR and payback period commonly used by industry, additional tools, which can be used to evaluate energy-related projects in financial terms, are described. Such tools consist of discount payback period, life cycle cost analysis, levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and saving to investment ratio.
135
Annex ICourse for University
Annex I
Course for University
136
Annex ICourse for University
I.1 EnMS Course for University
To develop the course materials, the project followed the process shown in Figure 4.4, which includes focus group meeting, review of existing materials, questionnaire survey, preparation of draft materials, review by lecturers, and preparation of final materials.
Figure 4.4 Course material development process
To learn from other perspectives and discuss the idea of course integration, the project organized a small focus group meeting with active participants who are also university lecturers. The half-day meeting was conducted on 8 October 2016. The list of participants is shown in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3 List of participants of focus group meeting
Name University
1. Dr. Surachai Sanitjai King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
2. Dr. Atikorn Wongsatanawarid King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
3. Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok
4. Dr. Chonlakarn Wongkhorsub King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok
5. Dr. Cheema Sorlump Kasetsart University
6. Mr. Rawit Thaweesub Rangsit University
All of the participants supported the idea of producing standard course materials that the lecturers can use freely with granted permission from UNIDO. It was also suggested to disseminate the course materials to other universities in the region to promote EnMS and SO practices.
137
Annex ICourse for University
EnMS Course Materials
The project has reviewed and analyzed the training materials for EnMS user training, EnMS technical training and EnMS expert training. Based on the review, the available training materials should cover all aspects of EnMS. However, additional content on the facilities may be required to guide the non-experienced students on the energy components of the factories and how things work in the factory environment.
To gain the lecturer’s perspective on the EnMS course for the undergraduate level, the project conducted an initial survey of the course content. The questionnaire was developed by using the review results of existing training materials and the feedback from the focus group meeting. The primary target group of the initial survey was the lecturer who attended the EnMS training organized by the IEE project. There were 21 participants who identified themselves as lecturers. Consequently, the project sent the questionnaire to them via e-mail. Nine participants returned the filled questionnaires. The project also got the filled questionnaires from two additional lecturers who did not participate in the EnMS training. The analysis of the respondents’ answers was used to design the course structure and content.
Since the course is designed for the 3rd and 4th year undergraduate student, it assumes that the student has a background on the energy-related terminology and basic calculation skills. The student may have no direct experience in utility and production processes, but should have some basic understanding of these processes.
The full content of the course are divided into 6 modules as shown below. - Module 1: Introduction and overview of Energy Management System (EnMS) – 8% - Module 2: Management commitment – 8% - Module 3: Energy Planning – 38% - Module 4: Implementation – 8% - Module 5: Monitoring and evaluation – 30% - Module 6: Management review – 8%
The instructors can either use all 6 modules or some specific modules in their class. The course is designed for a full semester course with 2 to 3 hours per class and one class per week. However, shorter teaching duration is feasible by decreasing the teaching time of each module or selecting only some modules matching the instructor’s objective.
The mixed teaching approaches such as lecture, discussion group and report writing are encouraged to increase the student’s learning experience. The discussion questions and exercises will be included in the slide presentation. Because of the student’s limited experience, the exercise and case study will be designed to facilitate the student through the significant step of energy management system by using the applied information from an actual factory.
The material package contains the following items: - Instruction of using EnMS course material - Syllabus - Presentation for 11 weeks (in ppt and in pdf) - Case study paper mill and data file in excel - Case study kaolin plant and data file in excel - Workshops and assignment - 25 case studies from IEE project - EnMS in brief flyer
138
Annex ICourse for University
I.2 SO Course for University
To develop the course materials, the project followed the process shown in Figure 4.4, which includes focus group meeting, review of existing materials, questionnaire survey, preparation of draft materials, review by lecturers, and preparation of final materials.
Figure 4.4 Course material development process
To gain the lecturer’s perspective on the SSO course for the undergraduate level, the project conducted an initial survey of the course’s content. The questionnaire was developed by using the review results of existing training materials and the feedback from the focus group meeting. The primary target group of the initial survey is the lecturer who has attended the SSO training organized by the IEE project. There are 9 participants who identified themselves as the lecturers. Therefore, the project sent the questionnaire to them via e-mail. Five participants returned the filled questionnaire. The analysis of the respondents’ answers was used to design the course structure and content. The draft course outline was sent to an international expert for review. Finally, the course materials were designed by three national trainers.
The material package contains the following items: - Instruction of using SSO course material - Syllabus - Presentation for 11 weeks (in ppt and in pdf) - Case study - Workshops and assignment - SSST excel file (in Thai) - Short video to demonstrate the equipment usage
top related