findings for ianda / cost of the diet in ghana wfp, 2017 · cost of a nutritious diet, by an...
Post on 31-May-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Findings for IANDA / Cost of the Diet in Ghana
WFP, 2017
Locally available
food items
Least expensive nutritious
diet
Possible diets meeting all
nutrient requirements of the household
Linear optimization (Cost of the Diet, developed by SC-UK) determines the least expensive nutritious diet
using locally available foods
Least expensive nutritious
diet adjusted to include two servings of preferredstaple per
day (SNUT)
Brong Afaho
Ashanti
WesternCentral
Eastern
Greater Accra
Northern
Upper West
Upper EastThe Cost of the Diet analysis has been conducted for 2
Regions: Northern & Brong Afaho
Volta
Nu
mb
er o
f fo
od
s in
th
e an
alys
is
SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015 prices)
SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017
prices)
SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017 prices)
38
56
+ 6 vegetables + 4 fruits/legumes + 5 fish/meat+ 3 others
The Cost of the Diet analysis has been conducted with different sets of data
SNUT also REACHED in the BA region
Note: SNUT NOT REACHED in the BA region
New locally produced fortified products, which were designed for Ghanaian market, were also added to the list of foods
Source: http://obaasimaghana.com/home.php
The cost of the Nutritious diet (SNUT) is 30% less expensive using a broader food dataset - Northern Region
0.30 0.60 0.36
1.211.24
1.12
6.995.5
2.76
2.21
1.83
1.76
3.89
4.01
3.16
14.60
13.18
9.17
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
SNUT - orginial food list (Oct 2015) SNUT - orginial food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017) SNUT - IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017)
Co
st o
f th
e SN
UT
per
ind
ivid
ual
(G
H¢)
Woman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderatly active (lactation, semester average)Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderatly activeAdolescent girl 14-15yChild 6-7 yearsChild 12-23 monthsHousehold
SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015)
SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)
SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)Source: WFP
analysis, 2017
0.36 0.55
1.12
1.64
1.76
2.63
3.16
4.00
2.76
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Northern Brong Afaho
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST (
GH
C)
Adolescent girl 14-15yWoman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderatly active (lactation, semester average)Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderatly activeChild 6-7 yearsChild 12-23 months
The cost of the Nutritious diet (SNUT) is 29% more expensive in the BA than in the Northern region
Northern Brong Afaho
+ 29 % cost
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Adolescent girl 14-15 yearsWoman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderately active (lactation, semester average)
Child 6-7 yearsChild 12-23 months
Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderately active
814 810 805
321
790 775
437
10269
375
646
119168
0
1178
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
SNUT - orginial food list (Oct 2015) SNUT - orginial food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017) SNUT - IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016-Jan2017)
Qu
anti
ty o
f fo
od
s p
er H
H p
er d
ay (
g)
Roots and tubersLegumes, nuts and seedsFish, seafood, amphibians and invertebratesEggs and egg productsVegetables and vegetable products
SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015)
SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)
SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)
A broader variety of vegetables reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of the Household – Northern region
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
From SNUT-Original (Nov2016-Jan2017) SNUT – IANDA (Nov2016-Jan2017)+ 1178g of vegetable daily (instead of 0)
5.5 times less animal source proteinLeads to a 30 % cost reduction of the Nutritious diet for the Household
Key findings
Between 2015 and 2016, the cost of the nutritious diet decreased by 10%, based onlyon price variation (same foods list)
Having a broader list of foods including nutritious vegetables and legumes decreasedthe cost of the nutritious diet by 30 %
The cost of the nutritious diet for a 4 member household is 29% more expensive inthe BA region than in the Northern region.
Key targeted groupsChild 12-23months
Kidifeed, Super Cerealplus and LNS-SQ reduce the cost of the child’s Nutritious diet (SNUT) the most - Northern region
0.36
0.15
0.11
0.28
0.06
0.17
0.10
0.07
0.10
0.29
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
SNUT SQ-LNS(GrowNut)(voucher)
SQ-LNS (iLiNS)(voucher)
Koko plus(voucher)
Kidifeed(voucher)
Ceresoy(voucher)
SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI)(voucher)
SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte(voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
SNUT SQ-LNS GrowNut(voucher)
SQ-LNS iLiNS
(voucher)
Koko plus(voucher)
Kidifeed(voucher)
Ceresoy(voucher)
SC+(voucher)
SC+ (CHAI)
(voucher)
SC(voucher)
MaisoyForte
(voucher)
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Kidifeed, Super Cereal plus and LNS-SQ reduce the cost of the child’s Nutritious diet (SNUT) the most - BA region
0.55
0.23
0.15
0.36
0.08
0.32
0.19
0.09
0.19
0.38
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
SNUT SQ-LNS(GrowNut)(voucher)
SQ-LNS (iLiNS)(voucher)
Koko plus(voucher)
Kidifeed(voucher)
Ceresoy(voucher)
SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI)(voucher)
SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte(voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
SNUT SQ-LNS GrowNut(voucher)
SQ-LNS iLiNS
(voucher)
Koko plus(voucher)
Kidifeed(voucher)
Ceresoy(voucher)
SC+(voucher)
SC+ (CHAI)
(voucher)
SC(voucher)
MaisoyForte
(voucher)
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Key targeted groupsAdolescent girl
Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a Adolescent Girl with different interventions - Northern region
2.76
2.03
2.27
2.67
2.46 2.48
2.19
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT Fruit and egg (voucher)Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
OFSP(voucher)SNUT Fruit & eggs
(voucher)
Obaasima products(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
Lola Milk Biscuit(voucher)
Samba Shito(voucher)
OFSP(voucher)
3.78
2.44
3.07
2.83
3.31
3.10
4.02
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT Fruit & eggs (voucher) Obaasima products(voucher)
TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit(voucher)
Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
SNUT Fruit & eggs(voucher)
Obaasima products(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
Lola Milk Biscuit
(voucher)
Samba Shito(voucher)
OFSP(voucher)
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a Adolescent Girl with different interventions - Brong Afaho region
Key targeted groupsLactating woman
3.16
1.78 1.80 1.80
2.72
3.19
2.91 2.95
2.59
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT SC & fortified oil(voucher)
SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasimaproducts(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
lola Milk Biscuit(voucher)
Samba Shito(voucher)
OFSP (voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
SNUT SC & Fortified oil(voucher)Source: WFP
analysis, 2017
Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a lactating woman with different interventions - Northern region
SC(voucher)
SC+(voucher)
Obaasima products(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
Lola Milk Biscuit
(voucher)
Samba Shito
(voucher)
OFSP(voucher)
Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a lactating woman with different interventions - Brong Afaho region
4
1.73
2.04 2.02
2.66
3.27
3.03
3.57
3.73
3.2
2.61
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT SC & Fortifiedoil (voucher)
SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasimaproducts(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
Lola Milk Biscuit(voucher)
Samba Shito(voucher)
OFSP (voucher) Fruit & Fish(voucher)
Fruit & egg(voucher)
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST (G
HC
)
(voucher)SNUT Fortified
oil & SC (voucher)
SC(voucher)
SC+(voucher)
Obaasima products(voucher)
TomVita(voucher)
Lola Milk Biscuit
(voucher)
Samba Shito
(voucher)
OFSP(voucher)
Fruit & egg(voucher)
Fruit & Fish
(voucher)
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Key findings
For the child (6-23 months) provision of locally produced Kidifeed (voucher), SuperCerealplus and SQ-LNS (Grownut) (voucher) were the most effective in reducing thecost of a nutritious diet, by an average in both regions of 84%, 82% and 60%,respectively, indicating that they are very good sources of essential nutrients.
For the adolescent girl, the fresh food voucher for eggs and green leafy vegetableswas the most cost-effective (average of 30% cost reduction in both regions), which isexplained by their relatively high content of calcium, iron and B12, which are limitingnutrients.
For lactating women, SC interventions (SC, SC+ and SC with fortified oil) were themost cost-effective and even more so when SC was modelled added to a diet thatincluded one serving of staple. On average, provision of SuperCereal for free (using avoucher) reduced the cost of a nutritious diet for lactating women by 50% in bothregions.
Obaasima modelling
3.323.24
2.55 2.562.42
2.28
3.32
2.87
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price (50 %) voucher Market price voucher
SNUT (Maize, Cassava) TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 23% even at market price - Northern region
SNUT TomVitaLola Milk
BiscuitSamba Shito
SNUT
-23%
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of the Adolescent girl by 11% when modelled at zero cost - Northern region
2.76 2.752.67 2.70
2.582.46
2.76
2.48
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price 50 % voucher Market price voucher
SNUT TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
TomVitaLola Milk
BiscuitSamba Shito
SNUT
-11%
4.00 3.99
3.27 3.313.17
3.03
4.00
3.43
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price (50 %) voucher Market price voucher
SNUT (Maize,Cassava)
TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 17% even at market price & 24% at zero cost - BA region
-24%
-17%
TomVitaLola Milk
BiscuitSamba Shito
SNUT
Lola milk Biscuit reduces cost of Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 17% even at market price & 25% at zero cost - BA region
3.78 3.75
3.07 3.112.97
2.83
3.76
3.31
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
snut Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price 50 % voucher Subsidies price 50 % voucher
SNUT TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
TomVitaLola Milk
BiscuitSamba Shito
SNUT
SNUT
-17%
-25%
Obaasima & Super Cereal Sensitivity Analysis
SNUT – IANDA2 staples
SNUT – IANDA 1 staples
50 %
Energy intakes (%RNI)
Sensitivity analysis: replacing the daily portion of cassava (one of the staple) by a portion of TomVita or Super Cereal
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
100 %
1 portion
1 portion
Other foods
1 portion
Other foods
OrOther foods
Or
OrOther foods
Or
3.16
2.67
1.80
3.16 3.14
2.49
2.31
1.44
2.49 2.48
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
2 Staples 1 Staples
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the
Nutritious diet of lactating women by 43% (2 staples) & 42% (1 staple) -Northern region
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
1 Staple2 StaplesSource: WFPanalysis, 2017
-43%
-42%
2.762.63
2.11
2.752.67
2.38
2.07
1.50
2.382.28
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
2 Staples 1 Staples
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 24% (2 staples) & 37% (1 staple) -
Northern region
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
1 Staple2 Staples
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (market price)
-24%
-37%
4.00
2.91
2.04
3.99
3.27
3.92
2.89
2.02
3.92
3.16
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
2 Staples 1 Staples
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 49% (2 staples) & 48% (1 staple) -
BA region
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
1 Staple2 Staples
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (market price)
-49% -48%
3.78
3.42
3.10
3.75
3.07
3.67
3.06
2.51
3.65
2.95
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
SNUT SC(market price)
SC(voucher)
TomVita (marketprice)
TomVita(voucher)
2 Staples 1 Staples
AV
ERA
GE
DA
ILY
CO
ST G
HC
Source: WFPanalysis, 2017
Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 18% (2 staples) & 32% (1 staple) - BA
region
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (voucher)
SC (market price)
SNUT SC (voucher)
1 Staple2 Staples
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (market price)
TomVita (market price)
-18%
-32%
Key findings
For the Obaasima products, the analysis found them to be less cost-effective to meetnutrient requirements compared to other options, which is due to the fact that theircontent of specific nutrients, including pantothenic acid, iron and vitamin B12, waslower than that of the other fortified options (SC, SC+, SC/oil) included in the model.
Among the three products, the Lola Milk Biscuit performed better, indicating that it wasa more cost-effective source of essential nutrients. Besides nutrient content and cost,acceptability and actual amount consumed by the intended targeted group are alsoimportant determinants of whether a specific food will be able to make a goodcontribution to improving nutrient intake.
Consumption of Obaasima products is likely to make a meaningful contribution tomeeting nutrient intake requirements even when it has a lower content of certainmicronutrients than other foods that consumers may or may not prefer over thoseproducts. Nevertheless, it would be good to consider increasing the content of thespecific micronutrients for which content is relatively low.
Note, CotD software aims to meet full requirements of energy, protein and 13 MNs
Many thanks for Your Attention !
top related