florida cause of leak study - neiwpccneiwpcc.org/neiwpcc_docs/ustlust_shows/mott_smith.pdf ·...
Post on 21-Oct-2019
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Florida Cause of Leak Study
Background Info – Florida’s Tanks Program
Single-wall ASTs - 20%
ASTs with Secondary Containment
80%Single-wall USTs
60%
Double-wall USTs - 40%
USTs ASTs18,040
3,954
16,286
11,937
Source - STCM, Feb 05
2005
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
'84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04
Inspections
Total Facility Inspections Performedin Florida
436,121 Total Inspections Performed
Source: STCM, Feb 05
4 18 19 53 141326
1010
2341
6303
1374
2330
33853467
18341775
12981206987
1271881
597504537615564
230
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
'80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04
Discharges
Petroleum Discharge Report Forms Received
32,769 Total Discharge Report Forms Received
Source: STCM, Feb 05
1271
881
597504 537
615 564
230
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05
Discharges
Post-1998 Petroleum Discharge Report Forms Received
4992 Post-1998 Discharge Report Forms Received
Source: STCM, Feb 05
Summary - Florida Cause of Leak Study
Methodology
Florida Identified Reported Releases (1995-2002)Florida Contracted with County Inspectors to ReviewRelease Sites and Document InformationCompleted Forms Sent to EPA for Data Entry & AnalysisVarious Quality Control StepsCurrent Status - EPA Report is ready for Peer Review
Invalid Files Include:•Releases from Bare Steel UST Systems•Release From Non-Compliant Component•Release of Old UST/AST Found at Closure•Unknown Sources
Size of Study2280 Release Files Reviewed642 Valid Release Files
512 UST Releases 130 AST Releases
AST Results
Sources of Releases
Tank5%
Other16%
Delivery32%
Dispenser12%
Piping35%
Other Sources Include: Fuel Filters, Outlet Valve, and Human Spilling
Causes of Releases
Phys/Mech Damage
19%
Other16%
Spill/Overfill36%
Unknown8%
Loose Component
12%
Corrosion9%
Other Causes Include: Vandalism, Valve Failure, Contractor Accident, Other Human Error
Causes of Piping Release
Corrosion26%
Phys/Mech Damage
29%
Loose Component
21%
Other9%
Unknown13%
Puncture2%
Method of Detection
Leak Detection
22%
Closure/ Removal
8%
Visual/ Olfactory
68%
Other2%
Success of Leak DetectionLD Detected
22%
LD Failed8%
LD Unable, or Unknow n
70%
LD Unable, or Unknown: Either the release came from a part of the system that a LD system was not designed to detect, or the inspector could not determine whether LD failed to detect.
Overfills and Piping
UST Results
Sources of Releases - USTs
Tank12%
Other11%
Spill/Overf ill in Fill Area
19%
Turbine Pump10% Dispenser
25%
Piping23%
- Tank Usage Versus Releases -
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
Steel
Fiberglas
s
C lad
Other
% releases% usage
Clad Tanks Had Relatively Fewer Releases
- Causes of Tank Releases -
Corrosion16%
Puncture27%
Unknown14%
Other13%
LooseComponent
8%
Phys/MechDamage
22%Primary Cause of Steel Tank Release – Corrosion
Primary Cause of Fiberglass Tank Release - Puncture
- Piping Usage Versus Releases -
0
20
40
60
80
Steel Fiberglass FlexiblePlastic
% release%usage
Further Analysis Required to Determine Statistical Significance
- Causes of Piping Releases - Phys/Mech
Damage22%
LooseComponent
20%Unknown20%
Other16%
Puncture15%
Corrosion7%
•Primary Cause of Steel Piping Release – Corrosion•Primary Cause of Fiberglass Piping Release – Loose Component
•Primary Cause of Flexible Plastic Piping – Phys/Mech Damage
Summary of Causes - USTsLoose
Component18%
Corrosion4%
Puncture8%
Spill12%Overfill
12%
Phys/Mech Damage
13%
Unknown17%
Other16%
Other Releases Include: Delivery to Monitoring Well, Vehicle Accident, Improper Installation, Vandalism
- Success of Leak Detection -LD Detected
25%
LD Failed25%
LD Unable, or Unknown
50%
LD Unable, or Unknown: Either the release came from a part of the system that a LD system was not designed to detect, or the inspector could not determine whether LD failed to detect.
- Method of Detection -% of Detections
Visual/ Olfactory
Closure/ Removal OtherCompliance
Inspector
Leak Detection
0
10
20
30
40
Other Methods Include: Unscheduled TTT/LTT, Dispenser Upgrades, Maintenance Inspections, Water in Tank
Piping,Dispensers
& Spill Buckets
Florida Leak Autopsy Study•Field-verified, Quality assurance•County Tanks Inspectors Complete Forms•Continuation of Florida Cause of Leak Study•Data compared to Forms submitted by tank owners
Florida Leak Autopsy StudyFour Page Form
Other (Specify)External Liner
No Overfill ProtectionCompartmentedOther (Specify)
Remote FillOther Approved (Tank Bladders, etc.)
Unknown
Alarm SystemSecondary Containment with a liner
PolyethyleneTight FillDouble Wall (different material)Concrete
Flow Shut-OffDouble Wall (same material)Other Approved
Ball Check ValveSingle WallUnprotected SteelOverfill ProtectionInternal LiningCompositeNo Spill ContainmentImpressed Current SystemFiberglass
Spill Containment Bucket
Sacrificial AnodesGalvanized Steel
Ancillary EquipmentOther AttributesMaterial
Florida Leak Autopsy Forms 1 Jan 03 – 1 Mar 05
•859 Forms
Invalid UST Forms
33%
Valid AST Discharges
30%
Valid UST Discharges
34%
Invalid AST Forms2%
Forms under investigation
1%
Piping18%
Overfills5%
Submersible Turbine Pumps
4%
Line Leak Detectors
2%Dispensers16%
Spill Buckets31%
Tanks10%
Vehicles, Vapor
recovery, ventlines,
vandalism andshear valves
6%
Flex connectors & Swing joints
4%
Fill Pipes3%
Dispenser & Piping Sumps
1%
UST Sources
305 Valid Forms
Single-Wall Composite Tanks
Single-Wall Internally Lined
Tanks
Single-Wall Fiberglass Tanks
Single-Wall Protected Steel
Tanks
Double-Wall Fiberglass Tanks
14
51
1 2
Tanks – 10%Double-wall tanks – 2%
2
5Double-Wall
Composite Tanks
Unknown
Single-Wall Protected Steel Piping
Other Single-Wall Pipe – (Copper)
Single-Wall Fiberglass
Piping
Double-Wall Thermoplastic Flexible Piping
Double-Wall Fiberglass Piping
4
1024
3
15
Piping – 18%Double-wall piping –9%
Overfills/Spills/Spill Buckets
39%
Piping22%
Submersible Turbine Pumps
4% Tanks10%
Other13%
Dispensers18%
Piping23%
Overfills/Spills/Spill Buckets
19%
Submersible Turbine Pumps
10%
Tanks12%
Other11%
Dispensers25%
Sources - <2003
Sources - >2003
Overfills/Spills/Spill Buckets
26%
Piping23%
Submersible Turbine Pumps
8%Tanks11%
Dispensers21 %
Other10%
Combined Data
827 Valid UST Forms
EPA, Office of Underground Storage Tanks
Mark Barolo
Barolo.mark@epa.govwww.epa.gov/oust./
703/603-7141
Marshall T. Mott-SmithBureau of Petroleum Storage Systems
(Phone) 850/245-8842marshall.mott-smith@dep.state.fl.us
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/tanks/default.htm
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
top related