fr tart ale examinin f ancin gh- growt tures · us canada eu late stage 0.132% 0.020% 0.012% early...

Post on 28-Sep-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

We examine the challenge entrepreneurial companies face in going beyond the start-up phase and growing into large successful companies. We examine the long-term financing of these so-called scale-up companies, focusing on the United States, Europe and Canada. We first provide a conceptual framework for understanding the challenges of financing scale-ups. We then show some data about the various aspects of financing scale-ups in the US, Europe and Canada. Finally we raise the question of long-term public policies to support the creation of a better scale-up environment.

From start-up to scale-up: examining public policies for the financing of high-growth ventures

Gilles Duruflé (gilles.durufle@sympatico.ca) is President of the QCC Public Policy Forum

on Venture Capital and Innovation. Thomas Hellmann (Thomas.Hellmann@sbs.ox.ac.uk),

Saïd School of Business, University of Oxford. Karen Wilson (karen.wilson@bruegel.org) is a

Senior Fellow at Bruegel.

This paper is forthcoming in 2018 in Mayer, C., S. Micossi, M. Onado, M. Pagano and A. Polo

(eds) Finance and Investment: The European Case, Oxford University Press

This paper was developed through CEPR’s Restarting European Long-Term Investment

Finance (RELTIF) Programme, which is funded by Emittenti Titoli. Financial support was also

provided by CEPR, Assonime, the John Fell and Saïd Foundations.

The authors would like to thank roundtable participants at the 1st Oxford Entrepreneurship

Policy Roundtable (May 2015), Bruegel (September 2015), The Quebec City Conference Tech

Innovation Platform (March 2016), the Oxford roundtable for the Barclays scale-up report

(May 2016), and the RELTIF workshops in Milan (January 2016) and Capri (June 2016),

including our discussants José Liberti and Andrew Ellul, for their many helpful insights and

suggestions. Finally the authors sincerely and gratefully thank the research assistants David

Cartwright, Denis Frydrych, Carolyn Hicks, Kaushal Inna and Christian Rauch.

WO

RK

ING

PAP

ER |

ISS

UE

04

| 20

17

GILLES DURUFLÉ, THOMAS HELLMANN AND KAREN WILSON

WO

RK

ING

PAPER | ISSU

E 16 | 2015

US Canada EU

Late stage 0.132% 0.020% 0.012%

Early stage 0.062% 0.028% 0.011%

0.000%

0.050%

0.100%

0.150%

0.200%

0.250%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

US 75% 74% 67% 67% 66% 66% 62% 67%

EU 63% 58% 52% 45% 45% 42% 46% 44%

Canada 41% 24% 27% 33% 40% 47% 53% 53%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

US EU Canada

1.9 8.9

19.6

28.1

36.7

48.9

1.4 8.6

16.1

25.3

29.9

35.2

1.1 7.1

13.4

20.922.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Seed A B C D E

Avg

. In

ve

ste

d A

mo

un

t ($

M)

Funding Round

US EU Canada

2.1

2.5

3.1

3.7

4.24.4

1.6

2.2

2.8

3.43.6

3.9

1.4

2.12.4

2.83.1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Seed A B C D E

Avg

. N

um

be

r o

f In

vesto

rs

Funding Round

US EU Canada

0.9

3.6

6.3

7.6

8.7

11.1

0.9

3.9

5.8

7.48

8.8

0.8

3.4

5.6

7.5 7.4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Seed A B C D E

Avg

. T

icket

Siz

e (

$M

)

Funding Round

US EU Canada

6

24

93

3 9

41

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

First Second LaterMe

dia

n p

re-m

on

ey v

alu

ati

on

by r

ou

nd

c

las

s (

$M

)Median pre-money valuation

by round class (in $M) in 2013

United States

Europe

99

17

2

44

US

EU

Canada

ROW

Smaller than $25M $25M-100$ $100M-$250M Larger than $250$

US 20% 27% 25% 28%

EU 22% 44% 24% 10%

Canada 12% 53% 24% 11%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Pe

rce

nt

of

Fun

ds

59

.7

17

2.5

30

0 32

5 36

4

37

2

72

.1 13

1.6

15

3.9 18

7.8

19

1.7

21

4.1

65

.5 11

3.1 1

35

20

0

19

5.2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Seed A B C D E

Me

dia

n F

un

d S

ize

($

M)

Funding Round

US EU Canada

51.7%39.6%

17.4%11.5%

31.5%

33.2%

30.7%

26.4%

9.3%

13.9%

22.1%

26.1%

7.5%13.3%

29.8%36.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Smaller than $25M $25M-100$ $100M-$250M Larger than $250$

Seed Series A Series B Series C+

42%

33%

25%

57%

31%

12%

71%

23%

6%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1 Round 2 Rounds >2 Rounds

% o

f In

ve

stm

en

ts

US EU Canada

79100

264.2

64.9

94.5

195.7

88107.5

123

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 Round 2 Rounds >2 Rounds

Me

dia

n F

un

d S

ize

($

M)

US EU Canada

6690

150

200

281

40 50 54

10382

5265

109 116

154

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

I II III IV V

Me

dia

n F

un

d S

ize

($

M)

Raised Funds over Time

US EU Canada

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Other 21% 24% 15% 19% 12% 21% 20% 19% 27%

Private Individuals 15% 16% 14% 18% 14% 8% 17% 7% 7%

Pension funds 12% 5% 9% 10% 8% 5% 9% 14% 7%

Government 14% 15% 29% 32% 33% 38% 34% 35% 31%

Fund of funds 13% 10% 13% 4% 10% 9% 9% 9% 12%

Corporate 11% 20% 8% 14% 14% 15% 7% 13% 14%

Banks 14% 10% 13% 4% 9% 4% 3% 3% 1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

19.8%

6.7%

15.9%

00%

05%

10%

15%

20%

25%

US EU Canada

% of Companies with Venture Debt

1.2 7.8

19.5

25.830.2

56.1

1.1 7.115.2

20.5

27.2

43.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Seed Series A Series B Series C Series D Series E

Ave

rag

e F

un

din

g V

olu

me

($

M)

With Debt Without Debt

119.1 8.9

1719.4

16.4

1.8 2.4 1.4 1.42.6 2.62.9

13.8

3.3

12.911.8

9.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

US EU Canada

392

273

115

6692

38

265

208

109

27 31 26

Life Sciences Software Hardware

US Closed US Raised $100M+

Europe Closed Europe Raised $100M+

9.7%

5.4%

1.7%0.7%

3.7%2.5%

0.8% 0.4%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Over $1B Over $2B Over $5B Over $10B

US Europe

6 33 52

78

141

210 214 214

367 331

128

80

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Am

ou

nt

Ra

ise

d (

$M

)

© Bruegel 2017. All rights reserved. Short sections, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted in the

original language without explicit permission provided that the source is acknowledged. Opinions expressed

in this publication are those of the author(s) alone.

Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, B-1210 Brussels

(+32) 2 227 4210

info@bruegel.org

www.bruegel.org

WO

RK

ING

PAPER | ISSU

E 16 | 2015

top related