geol rpt on the building stone · pdf filegeological report on the building stone project l...
Post on 06-Mar-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
41I09SW0014 2.15835 HENRY
GEOLOGICAL REPORT
ON THE
BUILDING STONE PROJECT
l010
RECEIVED
FEB2 -1995
MINING LANDS
LOUGHRIN AND HENRY TOWNSHIPS
SUDBURY MINING DIVISION
for
JOHN BRADY
by: NORWIN GEOLOGICAL LTD.
EDWARD SAWITZKY
JUNE 3, 1994
TABLE OF
41I09SW0014 2.15835 HENRY 01OC
SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PROPERTY, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY
3. PREVIOUS WORK
4. GEOLOGY
4.1 REGIONAL
4.2 LOCAL
5. MINERAL DEPOSIT
6. PROJECT
6.1 RATIONALE
6.2 METHODOLOGY
6.3 RESULTS
7. TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
7.1 OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
8. ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO NORTHERN ONTARIO
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
l
l
1
2
2
2
4
5
5
5
6
7
7
11
11
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY
Geological evaluation of thy site, finished products and
engineering tests indicate that:
1) the property contains at least out; - a fine-grained pink
granite, and possibly two - a black diabase, large stone deposits
of significant economic potential.
2) the Impalla granite deposit was not ev/dluateil due to poor market
conditions.
3) at least two of the developed faces ate capable of supporting
quarry operations as evidenced by removal of three intact blocks of
+X- 10 tons each.
4) initial industry evaluation based on engineering tests (Trow
Engineering, Sudbury) and appearance \iaV6 been positive in regards
to the pink granite.
5) production will remain dependent on economic and market
conditions.
6) the project has been a successful endeavour and added positively
to Ontario's dimension stone resources.
FR
ALE
CK
- IN
DIC
ATES
WO
RK
AR
EA
HU
TTC
WIS
NE
R
HA
NM
ER
AY
LME
RM
AC
KE
LCA
NMC
CART
HY
NO
RM
AN
Cap
reol
CA
PR
EO
L
MA
CB
ET
H
RA
TH
BU
NK
ELL
YM
CN
ISH
MA
CLE
NN
AN
SC
AD
DIN
GD
AV
ISJA
ME
S
i
BLE
ZA
RD
GA
RS
ON
FA
LCO
NB
RID
GE
9F
alco
nb
rid
ge
ST
RE
ET
LOU
GH
RIN
HE
NR
Y
MCKI
M * Sudbury
NE
ELO
ND
RY
DE
N
Con
isto
nl
FIG
UR
E l
J.
BR
AD
Y
PR
OP
ER
TY
PR
OP
ER
TY L
OC
ATIO
ND
ISTR
ICT
OF
SU
DB
UR
YJU
NE.
1994
1. INTRODUCTION
Heritage Fund Application #7114 by John Brady is a request for
assistance to pre-develop a newly discovered building stone deposit
with a focus on quarry development, block removal, cutting,
polishing, A.S.T.M. testing and industry appraisal.
This report summarizes the field woik carried out by the writer in November, 1993 on the stone projects in Loughrin and
Henry Townships.
2. PROPERTY. DESCRIPTION. LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY
The Loughrin deposit is accessed by Highway 535 and is 16 km. due north of the town of Hagar, Ontario. Hagar lies 55 km. east of
Sudbury along Highway 17 (Figures l and 2).
The deposit occurs on four (4) contiguous unpatented mining claims that straddle the north-south boundary line of Loughrin and
Henry townships. Claim numbers are S 1179570 - 1179573 inclusive.
John Brady is the sole proprietor of the property and there
are no contractual obligations or option agreements that apply to
the property.
3. PREVIOUS WORK
There has been no recorded prior work on the claims under
discussion (John Brady, pers. comm.)
The Loughrin deposit was discovered by Mr.Brady in 1992. A
preliminary assessment program of mapping, stripping, trenching and
small block removal was undertaken at an approximate cost of
160,000.
5l6 3000mN
2O
10
5l6 OO 00mN
9O
FIGURE 2 J. BRADY PROPERTY
TRENCHING LOCATIONSITES l. 2 8 3
PIS l RICT OF SUDBURY
JUNE, ( 994
page 2
4. GEOLOGY
4.1 REGIONAL
The deposit lies within the Central Gneiss Belt of the
Grenville Province of the Precambrian Shield. The host rocks are
of mesoproterozoic (0.9 to 1.6 Ga.) age and consist of migmatitic
and gneissic rocks of undetermined protolith (Lumbers, 1973).
These rocks occur as layered biotite gneib^es and mi gnu* t i tes which
locally include quartzofeldspathic yneissess, 01. thogueisses, and
paragneisses (Lumbers, 1973). Minor massive granite pegmatite and
cataclastic metadiabase of late precambrian aye also occur on the
property (Lumbers, 1973). Immediately east of the property lies a
large intrusive body of gabrro\anorthosite composition common to
the River Valley area.
4.2 LOCAL
The topography of the area of the property hosting the
potential building stone is relatively flat with local ridge
development of moderate to low relief. Overburden is generally
very shallow, often less than several inches to two feet in
thickness. Exposed bedrock, however, is less than about 2% by
area .
The property visit was restricted to outcrops from which face
development and block removal was carried out. Three outcrop areas
were examined.
The pink "granite 1 deposit consists of essentially two large
bedrock exposures (sites A and B, described below). The host rock
is an equigranular, fine to medium grained, biotite - amphibole
quartz monzonite. The rock is moderately to weakly foliated and
weakly gneissic. Minor constituents include magnetite and rare
STRO
NG
LY FR
AC
TUR
ED ^
't
^
w-ClAM
AS
SIV
E
(WE
AK
) ' j
GN
EIS
SO
SITY
\
r^* FAC
E H\
fi' x 4.5' - 5'-,
i S1 . 4.5- M 5V
|p
— "
\
10' * 3.5' -r 5'-^
Ji
i
\ '
J^F
AC
Elll
\-^Y
VS
- x 4- x 3.5-\
\
\V SITE A
^V
\ \
i '
i i
i j
\ j
* -T
'/M/
VN v o
/ff\
^/'
i^*'
--'""^^1
7 xofc
^,
^/S^ ^
' S
/^
'"4,i
X^/
( ^
J^^
'^ iS
s^trv
nch
N
XX
^.1
6"T/•/TV
MO
A
t — ?
J ^S
'
11 .
xi~
l
•'xPEG
MATO
OCLOTS
•^t^
Qf*
*m
fJtT
tYtf*
iC^ PEG
MATITIC
*
VEIN
\1 ^SH
ALLO
WO
/B
f~*c*
10ro 10)-^
. •--•y g- 'Rooe- ^;
j' o
' y \
\ 2
j
\ \
' ^
\ i
*- ——
——
"~ [
FACE u
i
\ i
V. -— -** "" *™ -^^ -1 * ^*"
LEGEN
D
1 PIN
K GR
ANITE
Z
DIABASE
ISITE c|1 —
——
——
' -r—
GN
EISSOSITY
. "—
— 4
fff4 O
F STR
IPPING
j ——
FA
CE
EDG
E
^M
DfN
OF M
AT
DM
L NCMO
MED
6* x
4.5
' * S'-tfH
HT
or M
iTD
Mt. M
MO
VC
9
^•OIF
TH
GC M
AT
DM
L MO
MO
VCD
^-^
2'"-'
FIGU
RE 3
J. BRAD
Y PRO
PERTY
2 ,.-;-V
"^r-^
S*s*.o4
2.
GEO
LOG
Y 2
(^C
Em
SITE A
SG
nr *r *vD
ISTRIC
T OF SU
DBU
RY
sotoo
ISO
F
EE
T
page 3
sulphide. Felsic (generally pegmatoid) and mafic veining\stringers
occur in minor amounts at site A arid are more common at site B.
Veins and stringers are often folded and or boudinaged. The colour
of the granite is fairly homogeneous - a pale to moderate pink.
The gneissosity gives the rock a characteristic banded appearance.
Fracturing varies from site to site (discussed below), with site A being generally more massive than site B. A detailed study of the fracture pattern would require a more thorough cleaning of the surface of the outcrops. Sheeting is difficult to determine
because of the lack of exposure in the vertical dimension.
A narrow 3-foot wide diabase dike crosscuts the granite several meters south of the face #2 (Site A) developed area.
Underlying the deposit area east of the latter pink granite is
a diabase dike ( > 80 foot width) which is medium to coarse grained, equigranular, non-foliated and variably magnetite-bearing ( <l% to 4-5*). Colour is uniformly greenish-black. Sulphide content is generally low ( < 0 .5 *). Minor thin ( < 1 \4 inch ) felsic stringers crosscut the diabase locally and trend parallel to fractures (Figures 3 and 4).
In the north exposure the bedrock is well-fractured with tightly spaced fractures (inches to feet).
Fracturing in the southern outcrops is less intense, however, exposure is poor (details below).
l P
INK
GR
AN
ITE
r-
GN
EIS
SO
SIT
Y
"—
AR
EA
O
F S
TRJP
PIN
G
ED
GE
erm
FIG
URE
4 J.
BR
ADY
PRO
PER
TY
GEO
LOG
Y SI
TE B
page 4
5. MINERAL DEPOSIT
Description of mineralization -1ype: Stone
Commodity sought is building alone predominately for
dimensional blocks; some usage for fiuniture and ornamental
purposes is possible.
Two varieties of stone were examined a ) a pink granite
b) u l.lack diabase
Dimensions:
a) Pink granite (sites A&B)
i) Overall dimension of intermittently exposed pink granite at
site A is about 420 feet, (north-south) by 180 feet (east-west).
ii) At site B, approximately 700 feet north along Hwy 535, the
overall dimension of exposed pink granite is about 110 feet by 50
feet.
b) Black diabase (site c.)
i) Overall dimension of site where faces I 4 2 are developed is 130
feet by 75 feet.
ii) At the second site (face III) overall dimension of exposed rock
is 45 feet by 30 feet.
page 5
Reserves
i) Pink Granite (sites A 4 B)
From the exposures at sites A and B and intermittently
stripped areas adjacent to these sites and assuming a vertical
depth of 50 feet; the potential mineral inventory of this pink granite would yield a volume of +X- 32 million cubic feet (assuming
a surface area and depth respectively of 800'x 800' x 50').
ii) Black Diabase
From the exposures at site C and intermittently stripped areas
adjacent to site C and assuming a veil i cal depth of 50 feet; the
potential mineral inventory of this black diabase would yield a
volume of +X- 4 million cubic feet (assuming a surface area and
depth respectively of 1000'x 80' x 50').
6. PROJECT
6.1 Rationale
The objective of this project was to test a newly discovered building stone deposit, in accordance with Schedule "A" ( see File #7114, legal agreement with NOHFC) .
6.2 Methodology
a) Site preparation:
John Deer excavator was employed to prepare quarry sites which involved cleaning, removal of waste jock, stone and site
rehabilitation. Also vised was a wajax pump foi hydraulic stripping
and cleaning.
page 6
b) Face development.:
-air track drill used for drilling off facts
-closely spaced drill holes, with average 1.5 inch separation
-average length of hole was four feet
-core size used was 2.5 inches
c) Block extraction:
After drilling off face, blocks were displaced from face by
blasting as follows: best results were obtained by using 1/4 stick
in two inside corners with double b-line running in each hole.
This shifted the block slightly away from the developed face. The
block was then removed via excavator, boom Ltuck and float.
6.3 Results
a) Site preparation:
Three sites were prepared, two on the pink granite and one on the
black diabase deposits.
b) Face development:
Site A: three developed faces arid four blocks removed each +X- 10
tons
Site B: one developed face and no blocks removed
Site C: two developed faces and foiu blocks removed each + \- 1 0
tons
page 7
c) ASTM testing:
Results from ASTM building stone testing are detailed in the
attached report from Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. (see Appendix
A). Trow considered the stone supplied by John Brady to be
suitable in all respects for building stone purposes.
d) Cutting and polishing: Trow Engineering commented that the
samples of stone from the Brady deposit polished well and was
attractive. George Khouri of Khouri Granite Ltd. (Sudbury, Ontario) likewise commented that the rock cuts and polishes well
and is a pleasing and attractive stone for decorative purposes. As per conditions of bulk sampling permit and marketing initiatives
samples of both the pink granite and black diabase were given to
the numerous industry representatives (see Appendix B).
In all cases industry comments were very favourable, however,
market conditions limit further exploitation of the resource at
this time.
e) Results of geological mapping is discussed below.
7. TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
7.1 Observations and Conclusions
Three sites were visited; two sites on the pink granite (sites A and B) and one on the black " granite 1 ( site C) (see Figures 2 and
3).
Pink Granite
This deposit consists of two separate bedrock exposures; site A is accessed by Hwy 535 and lies 50 feet west of the highway.
page 8
Site B also accessed by Hwy 535 lies appi oximal.ul y 300 fcet due
west of the highway and about 700 feel wu l h of site A.
a) Site A
At th.i site three separate localities had faces developed arid
each area will be discussed separately.
i) At the first location (Face I) the following observaLions were
made:
- one west and south face were developed
- dimensions of two exposed sides were 9x3 feet, and 9x4 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (sheeting); one observed
2) vertical; fractures are parallel to the gneissosity
- rock is a fine-grained, equigranular, foliated and weakly
gneissic pink granite, weakly magnetic and devoid of sulphides.
Biotite defines the fabric in the rock. Two thin mafic stringers
and one narrow pegmatite vein cross-cut folia and gneissosity.
Weakly oxidized upper surface of face gives took a slight yellowish
hue.
ii) At the second local, ion (Face TT) l.he following observations
were made:
- two north and one west face were developed
- dimensions were 6 x 4.5 feet, 6x4.5 feet and 10 x 3.5 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (10 dip degrees to the northeast, spacing > 30 inches)
2) fractures parallel to gneissosity (spacing ^ 1 0 feet in general)
3) fractures perpendicular to diabase dike liend ie. 240 degrees/80
degrees dip (narrow spacing inches to feet.)
page 9
4) fractures associated with the intrusion of the dia-base dike (140
degrees\ 80 degrees dip), this fiacturing decreases in intensity
rapidly away from the contact
- rock is fine-grained to medium grained, massive to gneissic, non-
xenolithic and lias minor veins\str.i.ngers (mafic and pegmatoid).
iii) At the third locality (Face III) the following observations
were made:
- one south face was developed
- dimensions were 18 x 4 x 3.5 feet
- fractures developed were:1) subflats (discontinuous, rusty, 15 - 25 degree dips northeast)
2) fractures 40 to 50 degrees\ 75 degree dip
- rock is fine to medium grained, equigranular, foliated and gneissic, weak to moderately magnetic arid pink in colour. Minor
mafic veining is present.
b) Site B
At this location one northerly face was developed. Face
development was parallel to fractured surface and, therefore, face
exposure is poor. Dimensions of exposed sides are 20 x 3 feet and 6x4 feet. Fracturing is fairly strong throughout outcrop and
spacing varies from 0.5 feet to 3 feet with prominent directions
being 260/80-75 dips and 0-20/80 east and west dips. Flats are
irregular in dip (north,east and west). The rock is fine grained,
equigranular, weakly magnetic, gneissic with veining (mafic and
felsic) more prominent than at site A.
page 10
c) Site C
At this location, opposite site A and 70 feet east of Highway
535, in two separate areas face development was attempted.
i) At this locality (Face I) one north face was developed.
- dimensions 10 x 4.5 x 4.5 feet
- fractures developed were:1) flats (numerous, narrow spacing < 3-4 inches)
2) vertical azimuth 320, spacing inches to 4 feet
- rock is medium grained, equigranular, strongly magnetic, non to weakly foliated with very low sulphide content. Colour is uniformly black to dark green.
ii) At this locality (Face III) one north face was developed.
- dimensions were 11 x 6 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (minor)2) 120 degrees dipping 80 (spacing 2 feet)
200 degrees dipping 80 (spacing l to 3 feet)
- rock is coarse grained, equigranular, non-foliated, and black to green in colour. Minor white felsic stringers are parallel to
second fracture set. This section is lower in elevation than the latter area and contains less fractured rock.
page 11
8. ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO NORTHERN ONTARIO
A total of nine people were employed by the project between
July 15 to September 15, 1994 at various times for approximately 40
manweeks of employment. Due to depressed market conditions no
further development/expenditures are warranted at this time.
Nonetheless, the project has confirmed that a very large deposit of
fine-grained pink granite and black diabase which meet both the
ASTM specifications and positive industry response to qualify as an
attractive commercial building stone are potentially available.
With improved economic conditions and available markets these
deposits would' be capable of supporting approximately 10 to 15
workers for 8 months of the year in extraction. An additional 6-8
workers could also be employed in cutting, polishing and marketing
efforts.
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Further development in the vicinity of sites A and B to find
more outcrops of pink granite, especially with a natural ridge face
to facilitate block removal.
2) Further site preparation and hydraulic washing in areas adjacent
to sites A and B to expose additional massive sections of pink
granite.
3) Further block removal at site A to test the depth potential of
this mateiial is warranted. Considering the significant cost of
this proposal, waiting until the market for stone has improved
should be considered.
4) Further development in the vicinity of site C to locate more
massive less fractured black diabase.
5) A diamond drilling program to determine depth of deposit (for
reserve calculations) arid density of fracturing.
Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. 1074 Webbwood Drive Sudbury, Ontario P3C 3B7
— Telephone: (705) 674-9681 HOW Sudbury Branch ____Facsimile: (705) 674-8271
SOO575R April 7, 1994
Mr. John Brady 1227 Holland Road Sudbury, Ontario P3A 3R1
Dear Sirs:
BUILDING STONE TEST RESULTSPINK GRANITE AND BLACK TRAP ROCK
SUDBURY, ONTARIO
Further to your request, we have completed ASTM building stone testing in connection
with the above noted rock and, based on our findings, we provide the following comments
and recommendations.
One, 200 mm block specimen of each rock type was delivered to our office in early
February 1994, together with a polished specimen of each rock. We have described the
rock/building stone as a mottled pink granite and black trap rock (probably diabase),
respectively.
We understand that the rock is derived from a potential quarry property north of Hagar,
Ontario.
Both specimens are attractive, well polished and seem very durable. There are no
apparent sulphides or iron minerals that would affect weathering or staining and both rock
types contain a high percentage of quartz minerals and can be considered granite. Testing
requirements for granite building stone were, therefore, undertaken and the laboratory
results are provided in the attached T^ble l.
SOO575R 2Trow
Both specimens exceed the ASTM compressive strength requirements; however, the black
granite is considerably stronger overall.
We trust the enclosed results are satisfactory. Should you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact this office.
Yours very truly,TROW CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.
W.G. Hunt/F.Eng. WGH:gmv21b Encl.
Trow Sudbury Branch
Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. 1074 Webbwood Drive Sudbury, Ontario P3C 3B7 Telephone: (705) 674-9681 Facsimile: (705) 674-8271
S00575R
Mr. John Brady 1227 Holland Road Sudbury, Ontario P3A 3R1
ATTENTION;
Dear Sirs:
September l, 1994
r. John Bradv
BUILDING STONE TESTSGRANITE SAMPLES
SUDBURY, ONTARIO
Further to your request, we conducted additional tests on two specimens retained at our
laboratory. Tests include the determination of the bulk specific gravity and absorption on
a black and pink granite respectively.
The results are as follows:
RESULTS
Absorption by weight
Absorption by Volume:
Bulk Specific Gravity:
Pink Black
Pink Black
Pink Black
0.217960.043896
0.595 960.13896
2.74 963.1496
Both stones exhibited acceptable values with respect to ASTM standards. There are no
accepted ASTM limits for abrasion resistance on granite, and as such we did not attempt
this test. Both samples would, however, likely pass marble abrasion resistance standards.
S0057SR
We trust the above information is satisfactory and should you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to contact our office.
Your truly,
TROW CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.
Trow
W.G. Hunt, P.Eng.
WGH:jt60
f*Trow
BLACK GRANITE;(SArt fi*
cHI
269.3 220.4 340.2 270.6 213.0 103.4*
("hairline fntclure noted)
Average UCS * 236.2 MPa
11.613.812.6
Average 12.7 MPa
RED GRANITEPi- Z l)
A I
124.8 121.6 117.8 170.4 134.4
Average UCS = 134.0 MPa
9.0 9.5 9.3
Average 9.3 MPa
Notes:
The minimum ASTM UCS for granite is 131.0 MPa. There is no specified minimum modulus of rupture for granite.
APPENDIX B
Khouri Granite - Elizabeth Street, Sudbury
Trow Engineering - 1074 Webbwood Drive, Sudbury
Deak Resources Ltd., - Virginiatown
Tundra Stone Ltd. - Kirkland Lake (saw samples)
Ontario Quarries Ltd., - F. Villano - Londsdale Avenue, Sudbury
Mineral Development Branch - Daniel le Spechrnan
Resident Geologists Office - Sudbury
Marble Trend Ltd. - Toronto
Ciot Ltd. Granite 4 Marble - Toronto
Positano Granite - Elmvale, Ontario
J. Brady - 1227 Holland Rd., Sudbury - has test samples available
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act
Transaction Number
tnwnal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mi hie collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Mlnii Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 8AS, telephone (705) 070-7264.
attractions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate. "'"SWOOM 2YswV- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment
Recorder.- A separate, copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.
900
Recorded Holders) Client No.
/ 32*1 tfc I/A ridTelephone No.
Mining DMsion-b
M or Q Plan No.u fc^
S&rr-d H 0 d^tx'jg/ejfforfc Performed (Check One Work Group Only)
WorkGroup
Geotechnical SurveyPhysical Work. Including Drilling
Rehabilitation
Other Authorized Work
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Type
fet? o k?/ W Rty taf (4.M(Affiki o*J J 'A/A/^y cfatf 1/71510
r pp^Fjvrn ~"c C p V - j •-.' ' -'-.i L u r- ' , . ^ .'
MINING ,AN,DS BRANCH
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs S ^tftf'Ptote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted If the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address
(attach a schedule H necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded In the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded hoMer.________________
or Agwit (Signature)
Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after to completion and annexed report Is true.
Name and Address ot Person certifying
Telepone No.
Por Office Use Only
l1,5 3 5
ii •i.
x
ffi f
l
oQ 0000
p HC
6 2. il
' (K.r"
09
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please Indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. G Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained In this report of work.3. G Credits are to be cut back as prtorized on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Not* l: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Mote 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
1 certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Signature Date
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Mmistere du Developpement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Loi sur les mines
Transaction No./N 0 de transaction
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Unda, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
da ulelLes renselgnements personnels cqstrecuelllls en vertu de la Loi sur le* mines et •erVTrbrftCtidee concessions mlnlerea. Adresser toute question sur la collece de"cesrenselgnements au chef provincial des terrains minlers, ministers duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar, 4* etage, Sudbury(Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/Couts directs
Type
WagesSataires
Contractor's and Consultant's Fs*sOrottsde rentrepreneur •t de I'expert- coneell
Supplies Used Foumiturss utlltsees
Equipment RentalLocation de materiel
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Type . . i G,*j6^.'^fr\
Type
Type
Amount Montant
VW
Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs
Totals Total global
fffr
*i*?*
2. Indirect Costs/Couts Indirect** * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en tant que travaux devaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and Lodging Nourrlture et hebergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation
DescriptionType
r"p~"--~ ~1 - -...,.. v ,
r E E '~' ~ i 0 1
J^^i^v-oiJH
Amount Montant
a** -
it
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total psrtlel des coOts Indirects
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Coats) Montant admissible (n'axcMant pas 20 H des coOts directs)YnftBl IfalllA Af AaAAMM^AABtA /^MA^tft \lmA^tlm ln&m
(Total of Direct and Allowable d'evaluatlo Indirect coatai (Total du et
to du credit ntftidlraeti
Totals Total global
-
3*8atki
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement oi costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le tltulaire enreglstre sera tenu de verifier les deceases demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a eel effet. SI la verification n'est pas effectuee, le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presented.
Filing Discounts
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1 Mm of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
Remises pour depot
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sent rembourses a 100 46 de la valour totale susmentionnee du credit devaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SO'Vb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
X 0.50 -
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 "ft de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentlonne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit devaluation Evaluation totale demandee
x 0,50 ~
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
;hat as (Recorded Holder, Agent, Position in Company)
o make this certification
Attestation de l'etat des couts
J'atteste par la presents :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formula de rapport de travail ci-joint.
l am authorized Et qu'a titre de ie suis autorise(titulaire enregistre, representant, posts occup* dans la compagnie)
a faire cette attestation.S) '
Signature/ 1 A
y/2•Z^-"/,/
Date 7
J812 (04*11 Nota : Dans cette (ormule, lorsqu'il designe des personnes, le masculin est utilisd au sens neutre.
Ministry'OfNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act
Transaction Number
Arsenal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used for correspondence. Questions about. Me collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, hidbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Detractions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form
o l SQ 3 e:asseramenfrore orCor&Olt tmVMining
Recorded HoWer(s) ,G. B ftftdv
Client No..///56A
•York Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group
Geotechnical SurveyPhysical Work. Including Drilling
Rehabilitation
Other Authorized Work
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Type
' \ . , t * S ' \
.-
MVTotal Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs S -3*Mote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name
.-S r r" A/lWJtV./ .5 *-U*
Address
(Mr! Lf
1
__^
l REOEiVFn j
L- FB r. . . on Ji- LCS ^ :"cj :
MINING uANJG BrUNCH l
{attach a schedule If necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report war* recc/ded In the current hokJer*srwne or heUunoV a b by the current recorded holder. c*
Retarded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification of Work Report Xl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the fact* set forth In this Work report, having performed the Ka completion and annexed report Is true.
Rente and Address of *er*on Certifying
or witnessed same during and/or after
POT Office Use Only SUDBURYDIV.
CEIVEDlit C f- 3 J994
NAgcH- R i Vi 5Da'te Notice for Amendments Sent
^
.11 S 0^
l .J
rj
Jiif
0^-K
rv
V
o
T
Value o*ASMMffltntWoctc Done on (Ma CWm
g***tiff
' J
B.
ex.
c\
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (*-) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. G Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Example* of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., wtth respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest In the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Signature Date
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers du Developpement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditttal des coOts aux fins du credit d'evaluation
Mining Act/Lol sur les mines
Transaction No./N 0 de transaction
2.1583 5Personal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presents formuto sont recueillis en vertu de la Loi aur lea mine* et serviront a tenlr a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines. 159, rue Cedar, 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/Gouts directs
Type
Wages Salalrm
Contractor's and Consultant's FeesDrolls d* •'entrepreneur et de I'eapert- coneaJI
SuppHeeUeed Foumlture* utlllsees
Equipment Rental Location de materiel
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Typ* , v AxtJe. :Ct x:t^ s*}?t c** Justify
Typ*
Type
Amount Montan!
W&&
Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs
Totals Total global
WOO
3 if 04
2. Indirect Costs/Gouts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibtes en tant que travaux d'evaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and Lodging Nourrtture et hebergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation
DescriptionType
' n c r"- ~c \ i ; r" ij f -' jC '-.^ 'C, i V C S
)' - F B ~; " '^'j - t. L ,- ...
— i —————————— l ^:fi:;iG ^^NJiiBH^
Amount Montant
•" i
J
riCH j
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partlel des couts Indlrects
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20* of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Tew of Direct end Allowable d'evaluation Indirect coot*) (Total dM coott dinel*
Totals Total global
?T^tf
: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le trtulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les defenses demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cot effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. le mlnistre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presentes.
Filing Discounts
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 500xo of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimedx 0.50
Remises pour depot
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sont rembourses a 100 'ft de la valeur totale susmentionnee du credit d'evaluation.
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 (to de la valeur totale du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0,50
Evaluation totale demandee
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
hereby certify:.hat the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs ware incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown yn the accompanying Report of Work .form.
hat as f *- ' '~l****4*- (\ i {AJ" *- | am authorized(Recorded Holder. Agent, Position in Company)
.o make this certification
Attestation de I'eUrt des couts
J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont et6 engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
Et qu'a litre de je suis autorise*(trtulaire enregistre, reprasentant. poste occupe dans la compagnie)
d faire cette attestation.
Date
•212(04/91! Nota : Dans cette formule, lorsqu'il designs des personnes, le masculin est utilise au sens heutre
Ministry ofNorthern Development"and Mine*
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act
Transaction Number
traonal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about hie collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Unda, Ministry of Northern Development and Minea, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Retractions: - Please type or print and submit In duplicate. ^- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.
2.1583 5essment work or consult the Mining
•York Performed (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup
Geotechnical Survey
Physical Work, Including Drilling
Rehabilitation
Other Authorized Work
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Type
u- -y-S/T d tity t&r sn Wf'/y cw* S/79516
l ^ ••"' c ^fck \——————————————— i LTP 2 - w. — i ——
IsiiSiAN^.bMAKCS i
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs Mote The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address
3 CX-X i^L
(attach a schedule If necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered m this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder. [
Holder or Agent (Signature)
fCertification of Work Report
l certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth In this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after Us completion and annexed report la true._______________^^^^ Name and Address of Person Certifying ———~——~——————————————————————————————————
Vetopone No.Jo/)/J 6.
for Office Use Only TTotal Value Cr. Recorded
RECEIVEDDEC ' 5 1994
P.M.
•4
4\-J
if
P
^
iFikj
1s#
1HOW
-,—
H--' SG
f.-|v ~
"i.; ." "i i
C?"1 0
go:-r '---' "*~
JiNiW
.-l
^
Ci\ 2
rCr\
J
T^
V
r
;C(
*JW^
•v ft
LI
value of Ai^a^sjB^BfflaWtf Work Done on this Claim
^fff
fSthisVakM
Assigne from
Lt5JSI
10 bo ed al re Date
Credits you ara claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please Indicate from which claims you wish to prtorlze the delation of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. QKCredtts are to be cut back equally over all claims contained In thia report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorlzed on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examplaa of beneficial Interest ara unrecorded tranafara, option agreatnanta, memorandum of agreements, etc., with reaped to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has bean performed on patented or (assad land, plsaas complete the following:
l certify that th* recorded holder had a btnefletal Interest in the patented or teased land at the time the work was performed.
SignatureData
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentnml Minos
l i.i* til. '|*f lf muni tin
el des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditrial iloo t i tilla aim finndu credit d'evaluation
Mining Act/Lol sur les mines
Transaction No /N" de transaction
2.1583 5Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(a). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renselgnements personnels contenus dans la presents formula sont recueillls en vertu de la Lot aur lea mines et servlront a tenlr a Jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute queslton sur la collece de cea renselgnements au chef provincial des terrains mlniers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines. 159, rue Cedar, 4" etage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (70S) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs
Type
Wages Salaires
Contractor's and Consultant's Fees Drolls de ('entrepreneur et de I'expert- consell
Supplies Used Fournltures utilise**
Equipment Rental Location de materiel
Description
Labour Maln-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Type fl.^C+1 -&W&'1'
Typ*
Type
Amount Montant
; 4 tttt '-
Total Direct Coats Total des coOts directs
Totals Total global
4^*
4iou
2. Indirect Costs/CoQts indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coOts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en tant que travaux devaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and Lodging NourrHura et hebwgementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation
Description
Type
f R r r K?T\7t ~ i"1—.- - ±,s F^J 3 m i1
! ;-FB ;. - - :is——— I.VNi^o L/-.N?.)': l
Amount Montant
sr-rT ~?h U ' t
i
""" -^* - .. ,. ...
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partial das couts Indirects
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costa) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des coOts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Vsleur totale du credit (Total of Direct ind Allowable devaluation Indirect crate) (Tout du cofa dlraeti
Totals Total global
•t IndcMts •duilwlbtes
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of (he assessment work submitted.
Note : Le titulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demanda a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuAe, le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partle des travaux devaluation prdsentes.
Filing Discounts Remises pour depot
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1000xb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont rembourses a 100 "ft de la valeur totale susmentionnee du credit devaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOo/o of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
' Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
x 0.50 -
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 Vo de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0,50
Evaluation totale demandte
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown an the accompanying Report of Work form.
.hat as (Recorctap Holder. Agent, Position in Company)
o make this certification
Attestation de I'etat des couts
J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont et6 engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
am authorized Et qu'a titre de je suis autorise(titulaire enregistre, representant, poste occup* dang la compagnie)
a faire cette attestation.
Date
.212(04^1) Nota : Dans cette formula/ lorsqu'il desigrfe des personnes, le masculin est utilis6 au sens neutre.
*t*nfc*fcjfc.*.i*.-.
*
-^™ \ MinistryW"sJLX Transportation Ontario
^OJECT ;)MTRArT wn
iRK PERFORMED BY
DAILY WORK RECORD
Vi . ......- .rnwTRArrnn ^F* 9
^^ff 07416LT) ACCOUNT NO
^f , -)1 IQ flATF ~^l(fJllJ o/o* l 7*.1 '
REG./DIST. NO.
IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR
CLASSIFICATION
PfY^/ntfsl/V; \terOp^r/iTDffs\r)\f\?*(3'f" Q
NUMBER
/
/
1
j
HOURSEACH
JO/o/x/x
TOTAL MAN HOURS
JO/o/xfi
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P.FUEL0 -HASn nw Bf L
OPERATOR INCL HOURS WQflKFO
/?'// /O
A r r
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR
TYPE QUANITY NEW(, ) USED(, ) REMARKS
iCEIVED
MINING 1 AMo
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WRK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
NVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLET1ON OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALC-754 92-11
'ntario
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD If 07416
OJECT/ NTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR
ACCOUNT NO..
DATE.
HK PERFORMED BY. REG ./DIST. NO..
IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR
CLASSIFICATION
FrVTenotfyO
Nr.'/lr-A
QpfiTCuroff" ftf(\f\f*ef
o
NUMBER
f
l
l
f
HOURSEACH
/O/oKH
TOTAL MAN HOURS
/O/On/x
REMARKS
j
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P. OPFRATOfl INC L.
/V/// /
\)
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW(, } USED (, 1 REMARKS
^A
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
l HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLET1ON OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALCC-754 W-11 ^ Ontario J
ntario
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416ACCOUNT NO..
OJECT l NTRACT NO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR DATE.
)RK PERFORMED BY. REG7DIST. NO.
IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER 'EQUIPMENT DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR ^
CLASSIFICATION
rf?n?vrVlr\IV, l/rtr
C)n^rn-h)/'t
Lj)hniis-
NUMBER
/
1
f
1
HOURS EACH
/Ojnl/
/f fa
TOTAL MAN HOURS
/O
/O
ft
fr fa
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWN "NDESCRIPTION
TYPE
I-/U draju /i f Ar///fyr/jj/flim^Truck•^GTiJifi "1S(J rA
MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR
Onprn 5uCfrT 33Xfa ~7Dn
3M -rnn
H. P.CAPACITY
OHn v w
FUELa HAS n mr ttFi
OPERATOR INC L.WM. i vrs). i
HOUflS WOWKFD
/nx//r
HOUW9 9 T AMD H Y
^
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW(,) USED (, ) REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
THE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY. THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALCC-754 9J-11
MinistryofTransportation
••"*-ta~1..4-(.r*^,tx.,V,.^H*Jfc.*.,,..-,,;t ..,.*..——^.-.^-r-*^"*" ---~
DAILY WORK RECORD f 07416nlario ACCOUNT NO..
XJECT / NTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR DATE.
'IK PERFORMED BY. REG./DIST. NO.
IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR "
CLASSIFICATION
nQCf* mn ArtlYilAo^
rS .rn-JfiS
L/ihnuf
NUMBER
1
1
1
(
HOUHS EACH
9/olih
TOTAL MAN HOURS
9(O/f/e
REMARKS
J
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWN ^DESCRIPTION
TYPE
l-fijrlmj^/i'f A rillLtm\)ni}orTp j rk
^er\ltfjp, ^-ffurk
MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR
Cfi/y/) *57/^
P&T sJ^X
fa 'Tfisi^ -77V7
H. P.™ FUFL
Q-OAS O - Wf RFL
OPERATOR INCLH0|, ) *FR[, )
HOURS WORKED
/O((4-^
HOURS STAND RV
^
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITV UNITS NEW (, ) USED!,) REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION "
v
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
1 Mf: SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALCC-754
Jniario
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416ACCOUNT NO..
•OJECT l iNTRACT NO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR DATE
ORK PERFORMED BY. REG./DIST. NO..
( IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR
CLASSIFICATION
\~OCerf\ftj~\
bvtllrs-
OfornrDrA'lteJerLfiLhf)!U(S~
NUMBER
/
/
/
(
l
HOURS EACH
CI
q/o3z
TOTAL MAN HOURS
q9(Oy•z
REMARKS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P.FUELa OASn-DMSFL
OPERATOR INCL
PjCpcn/O
fa te
MA 1 tHIAL bUPPLltD BY UONTHAU 1 UH
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW),) USED). 1 REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES D NO D ^^^^
THE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
NVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
ORIGINALCC-754 92-11 ^ Ontario^
Ontario
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416
lOJECT/ iNTRACT NO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR
ACCOUNT NO..
DATE l J
ORK PERFORMED BY. REG./DIST.NO.
( IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR
CLASSIFICATION NUMBERHOURS EACH
TOTAL MAN HOURS REMARKS
2L
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE. MODEL AND YEAR H. P. OPERATOR INCL.
-IrurJt/f?
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW), ) USED (t ) REMARKS
^
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES NO Q
THE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINAL(-CC-7S4 92-11
f®^ Ontario^
i
•itario
Ministryor Transportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416ACCOUNT NO.______
1JECT l NTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR DATE rrT,
PERFORMED BY. REG./DIST.NO.
'F OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR "^
CLASSIFICATION
rnrf^rnfinhrillr/-Qpem-forhlte^LrmniLf
NUMBER
l
j
1
l
f
HOURS EACH
37fa9fayf
TOTAL MAN HOURS
J?
r?ta
9 fa
xf
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P. OPf RATCm INCL.
A r, II Ctoco'
'/JL
g
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW(,) USEDU REMARKS
| ^
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
l HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
'NVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLET1ON OF WORK
ORIGINALCC-nt 9M1 ^ Ontario^
Buario
MinistryOfTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD l 07416
UECT/ MTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR .
ACCOUNT NO..
DATEra
RK PERFORMED BY. REO./DIST.NO..
' OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT1 DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR
CLASSIFICATION
rfy&mfts}/V,//^Cln^^nJrD/^
filn^4erin hour
NUMBER
1
t
f
f
f
HOURS EACH
9
/^
If
yz
TOTAL MAN HOURS
9/oH
3z
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWN "^DESCRIPTION
TYPE
HI i rim j i h r J\n lifAtrjiiin Jar-7: "n A r k-Pfiuirtps -^rutk
^•x~r\Jirt -~7??jrA
MAKE. MODEL AND YEAR
finorn 5jafa-T r03T-fa -TOnfa —m^3/V -7^^
H. P.CAPACITY
CM 0 V W
n*L n rwso-wfsn
O PT R A TOR fNCLMO).) vrs* )
HoumWOMIFO
/n//3Ft)
MOM STAND PIV
^
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS Nt-WU USEOU REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
i HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTBACTOFTS REPRESENTATIVE COHTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALCC-TS4 W-11 Ontario
itano
MinistryOfTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416ACCOUNT NO. --—^—-
'JECT/J TRACT NO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR .
iK PERFORMED BY.
HATC
REG7DIST. NO.
' OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR ^
CLASSIFICATION
^-zy??rry?v)hrillfy-OperatorJM^4erLfiHouS'
NUMBER
;x111
HOURS ^EACH
9/n/xf^
TOTAt. MAN HOURS
^
/O/x7rf
REMARKS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P. OPERATOR INCLNOI i vrsi i
\n///x
KJtZ
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS NEW*,) U*ED(,) REMARKS
J
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO D
HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE WORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
INVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALCC-7S4 W-11 ^ Ontario j
D'lario
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD 1-07416ACCOUNT NO. -^-—™
iJECT/ JTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR . DATE. 3/43
RK PERFORMED BY. REG./DIST. NO.
IF OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR ^
CLASSIFICATION
/-/)frrcVrVl/'!
/Vi'l/rT'lf)f*f7L1Dr
fttfxJesLahrtji/'
NUMBER
sys/1
HOURS EACH
?ft
910x3
TOTAL MAN HOURSV'fc9/ot??
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P.run.n OA8o-Dirsn
OPf RATOW (NCL.
/-Ir m /G
Polde
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITY UNITS N6WI.) USED!,) REMARKS
-4
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE MDRK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
JVOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALC-7S4 W-11 L Ontario ,
MinistryOfTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORDnano
1-07416ACCOUNT NO. ______
UECT/ JTRACTNO..
PRIME CONTRACTOR DATE.
IK PERFORMED BY. REG7DIST. NO.
F OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR ^
CLASSIFICATION
\^frtYfis\t\n\\rrnflr/nJwtiJMk^y/9/y^x"
NUMBER
;s\ii
HOURS EACH
g
tfo
9foxZ
TOTAL MAN HOURS
?
Ifa
9ftfZ
REMARKS
^
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWNDESCRIPTION
TYPE MAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. P.
r/*h
MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
TYPE OUANITV UNITS NEWU USED(,) REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
HE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE MDRK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
NVOICe TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETtON OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALC-nt BM1 ^ Ontario ^
MinistryofTransportation
DAILY WORK RECORD l 07416itario
XJECT/ JTRACT NO .,
IK PERFORMED BY
PRIM -CONI
E TRACTOR
AnroiiNT NO
f 2 2 *~\jh-y
^REG./DIST. NO.
'P OPERATOR INCLUDED UNDER "EQUIPMENT" DO NOT SHOW IN THIS SECTION ) LABOUR ^
CLASSIFICATION(-~~
rv.'f/r^yQf)f*sriTDrn^-/?/l&inQijf
iniuacB HOUnS TOT*L numcn eACH MAN HOURS
1 tf yt n fi
j %'U X faj 4fa 9fat O Oy A ,/jl 3 *Z
REMARKS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - COMPLETE DETAIL TO BE SHOWN ^
TYPE
l-LAf(iul,r A^/7/f A/ r fa** kv"7?t/ CAffaiAides' ^fn^rA^)rruisj ^TnjfX
TYPE
DESCRIPTIONMAKE, MODEL AND YEAR H. D '"if* S^U. OPf.RATOnlNCL. ^m, MOIM
r ' O VW D-bltSn. NO 1,1 *fSM *upwtu ftTAHOIW
fayyy) 5~/** f fafiAr- 33-? *9'/*fa -Ten 3fafa T&n 23A/ -ras-* .-T
^MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR ^
OUANITY UNfTS NEW d ) UXDU REMARKS
DESCRIBE TO-DAYS WORK AND LOCATION ^
DOES THE ABOVE WORK COMPLETE ENTIRE TIME AND MATERIAL ACCOUNT ? YES Q NO Q
t IE SIGNATURE OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF THE LABOUR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED ON THE VORK AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS INVOLVING ANY LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT BY THE MINISTRY.
WOICE TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF COMLETION OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
ORIGINALC-754 W-11 ^Ontario ^
Bert Duchesne Rejean Roy25 Tiller Street 4598 LafontaineKilarney, Ontario Hanmer, OntarioPOM 2AO P3P 1K6
Position: Foreman Position: Blaster
John Mourot John Cameron58 Brunet W. 78 Coniston RoadAzilda, Ontario Garson, OntarioPOM 1BO POM 170
Position: Driller Position: Labour
Bruce Burke Joe Bardswich40 Charles Street 1387 OrangegroveKillarney, Ontario Sudbury, OntarioPOM 2AO P3A 4T9
Position: Operator Position: Engineer
Glen Stewart 505 Dutrisac Road Sturgeon Falls, Ontario POH 2GO
Position: Operator
OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines
Geoscience Approvals Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
April 3, 1995 Our File: 2.15835Transaction #: W9470. 00236
.00237
.00252 Mines
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development933 Ramsey Lake Road3rd FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6B5
Dear Sir:
Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIM 8.1179570 IN HENRY AND LOUGHRIN TOWNSHIPS
The deficiencies in the original submission have been rectified.
Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the original report of work. The credits have been approved under Section 10, Physical, Section 12, Geology and Section 18(4), Other, Mining Act Regulations.
The approval date is March 30, 1995.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome at (705) 670-5855.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division
LJ/jl Enclosure:
cc: Resident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario
ssessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario
Ministry o y oNorthern Developmentand Mines
DAVJ S T 0/W NINDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
M.H.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
SUDBURYDIVISION
SUDBURY1MB TITLES/REGISTRY DfVtSION
SUDBURY
PLAN
G-4075TOWNSHIP
S4}97990 |g03GQ3 t
97^2 LOUGHRIN119-799^I1979ST980332 Q 3 6 fi RECEIVED
1197^89
- - ^L-a*-^- - - - — /^-' - -r -- — —--- -* J ,——, ,
979857987 419 7 9
7957098043
\
o.k
t?-~ *- s-90" * CO
80 LU
J X *c^-O"
\—
. 7 C
(O
:- -5V
1CV
- -V
V*
60
50
40
— ^ *" ** ^
, ** c ."l v*
1197977 --iH 98044 '20365^- 1
.1-4
t " 1
± -^ [
*. ~ ,.~~-^^l
~-\ r
r*' J,-,^ ~1
IB
1196054^
9
E: -v _ ^~,
5i3- '---""9 ~
f" ^ ^ [ 11979*4
E ; 7^JI IPQS677J '
* 5
IPO3 5B
O /"k "2 r "7 d~S, r
r 5^ I•i
9-
*
CL 963
0
—— — — — __^_^>_
r — "\
s' -t*
J.
9 r- -.
9
\^,
CL 363
*
~r~
/s*
<
^jtf*T*76
— ff-QistT
^-
X -
** *
' i ;' *- s
" ^ ^— -
-f s
i
""7
t
1
1- t
rH(5) j
OjHTO '
MtTMI
— — -~
^-T
9 '
* *
IHT17S,-JL -''go1667
, . ./|
1197965|gQ3C7G |
.— — — — — — — ^jl ^
11 -v^j*--"
B V
*
**
1
9
*
f
t
i t
1197979 ^ f
-^- ^ -' ^ - ^ 1
,- \ ^"^
tr97980 ]~- r~" — " 400"^"^^^ i ^^^^,
^ - O"
-119791 L. w O O ^ ^ ^
*~ '^ ' ~ y'^'
^--—-' '^s~
t
^ f
1
1
^
f . 11^97-
t ^g Q-^
K - -'
l.r^-.
, "* -
^ .*
- ;i -^4— —^i975C* f~~ f~~
,\ ^' \
e'^
. r:...... , -" '
9\
' ^ vs
f ;' 1197
' ~^^
t L
?5~
"^ ~
/X
0
* * w
® .
- -
I197SI -Ytttr
L ————— —, jf^
- r ~~ - - 'v,
\960^~~^
\^~
ea -l/ ^-^^ ' ^~-~
x"1" - Tv ^-.1
-VT
f9
" *
- A^-7 - - - ——"-^:
t
0
"Iv^T
s*•s - -
sf ^~
_ "- ^*-
f ~~
1197973 — fgQ3664
^v
9 .* —
- — - — — -C^-'j
^ ^
0
1197967-
——H ^j* - ^"~66
tt,-t- - " *
...,:.-j
9
• - —
-^ -**
9
9
1197959•I203C80
\
^1 '
il
8i ; - . :5 4- ' ; 1 1 Q 7 Q -Q o. -~- -^— ~ ,
1 ^ ^X f ^tc —.^^T1^^" -'-- —— -~~" " ~-
^?-E.-~ - '. ^- -, i
•*- ^-^5^^-
,^-\ -~
1197983 . -.- i •^2-9^-6^^^.. - , -fie-9^4
-~ ^-^ t -1 i —L- r — ^ '
i ^ ~ - ' :i - ,- L~-~i _ — ~~\ ~~
L ^ "" r " i i
* 1 11*7171I97B72 i-*^*^- i - i
L - ^--J'~ c ^ 1 ^~ r— "--r l ~^--A.~J-
•^ 1 " i1 *
...:.i..J1*1' -J 1
11
J* * J *v H 1 1
l -~ A' 5 1 t^---- ln o ~? b c P. 1 1 y f y o o
. 1....... i
9 . ^ — -i ; .~ ^(^
—— ^
— ^^ — — — — — — p — — T-— — — —
; , - ' y 11975|~V J"~"-'X^ '' -~^ i o pv 77
---^-'^r |( "r ^UO* .1! i
L- .."^"^1
^ 1l
M979I -f^0^4
1
7 0
L r ^--- - -J--"--
1197969
i i
" *
_ ^-q: ^r — ^^-^
* ^
^
58J Q | —— "^ ^
s
f
^^^
.
0 *. ,-^ ce -"1
1^—
"- 0
^r 1
- 1197*87
ICOE6M
l .J '
^~^~L-^ . r
t
1 - ! H l
l
11971956 H20^CCO-
t
e
\i -\ i l l 1 1 l
* 1 *^-C-^'^. . i ^ — , -
1 'i
- 11
L^-J^ ^ "^
-~ - Hs' s — '
0 -"0
-r
J^^
* /* -^*
" * -s* *
—
119795-4
i
T
- ~ - —— 't
1197355-
i-L
1L — - — - ~"".~Y "
9 9
.* —————— —— _ -~
•*" *"
fc
*
* 9
^ 1
1 . r ^1 JU*-'M-r
' 117*551 J1 -r- -hi *
3I VE"E ^^'~
' fl-i'X* — " *
*o co o3
Xm
X)^
90
O)ec
70*
se
- /
40
14 13 12 11 10 6 ^ 4- ;*—^^cvO"
. zM Er o•—o 2 o* fO
SMD 4075
•^ A R TOWNSHLP^-A ^ --
'f 1
53JO00"E 40 5C 70 80B0 0 34 60 0 52 80 C 3C'
90
ZONE 17
54QOOO m E 20 30 40 545COC"E800 36'
, A 9 ff*
PO O3
BS 06
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSfTIONMRO- Mining Rights OnlySRO - Surface Rights OnlyM -t- S - Mining and Surface Rtghts
SYMBOLS Oaacnpltoft
Sw. 36 8C
Order No
l* 99/96
Dote5/11/86
F9e• •f S
Township Meridian Baseline
Road allowance sjrveved snorelme
surveyedunsu'veyed
Parcel surveyedunsurveyed
Right-of-way ^oad
Jldry
Reservation
Cliff Pu Pite
Contou-Interpolatec Aoprox mateDepression
Cant'Ol poml (horizontal)
Flooded land
Mine head frame
Pipeline (above grounci
Ratlwav sngle - racK double f ace, aoandoned
Road hignwav coun*y lownsnio access trat. oush
Shoreline (original i
Transmission (.ne
Wooded area
MSPOSmON OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Strface A Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only
LeaseSurface 8. Mining Rights Surface Rignts Only Mining Rights Only
Licence of Occupation
Order-m-Council
Cancelled
Reservation
Sand A Gravel
e e
H aT oc ® O O
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BfiEN COMPILED ROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN- TNG CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH T,HE MINING RECORDER MINISTFT OF NORTHflRN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES FOR AD DmOMAlt INFORMATION ON THE [STATUS OF THE LANDS Sf OWN HEP.EON
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch Ministry of Natural Resources
The disposition of land location of tot fabric and parcel boundaries on the nfex was compiled for administrative purposes only
O
CD
^D
nj
CDl-1^o-Nl
01
200
WOT t *
V * JANES TOWNSHIP
9 7 912 232- .197911 .1979099,7910 1203-23
979I7 979 ?0360
197918 , T(1203238, 1203^*4
7 l Id 7 9(1
1979221197921795731197929
, 7 w 'i7-9' 24
^-"^ 1) ^ '-"YP"krryr-'.;
i i -4. .-J/—I-—,'——,.V' * v,-*. i! 1 '
LTSJj*———.——^—l ^ 'l -- Y l.
l ____ j,^
RATTER-. OWNSH
41I088W0014 2 16836 HENRY 210
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern AffairsResources and Mines
Ontario
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
PLAN
G-29I3TOWNSHIP
HENRY
ME OF ISSUE
warn
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
NORTH BAYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION
SUDBURY
1000Metrti
1000 OFMI H H M H a ir-
Scale 1 20 000
1000
1000 2000 3000 4000 SOOO 9000 7000 0000
2000 -l M*tr*t
eooo loooo- —————l f Ml
Contour Interval 10 Metre*
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITIONMRO- Mining Rights OnlySRO- Surface Rights OnlyM t S - Mining and Surface Rights
SYMBOLS D*tcrlptlQn OrdarNo DM* Dl*po*ltlon FM*
BoundaryTownship Meridian, Baseline
Road allowance, surveyed shoreline
Lnt/Concession, surveyed unsurveyed
Parcel, surveyedunsurveyed
Right-of-way, roadrailwa/ utility
Resetvdliun
Contour Interpolated Approximate Depression
Control point (horizontal)
Flooded land
Mine head frame
Pipeline (above ground)
Railway, single track double track abandoned
Road, highway, county, township access trail, bush
Shoreline (original)
Transmission line
Wooded area
AANNULMENT
SUBDIVISION OF THIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND C ONCESSIONS WAS PARTIALLY ANNULLED ON JANUARY 2, 1904
A.P ISST* WWYMAYIT. 11(4
A.P.ISSTS tXPlHY HAY IT, IM4
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface A Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only
LeaseSurface 8, Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only
Licence of Occupation
Order-m-Council
Cancelled
Reservation
Sand S Gravel
e Q
aT
ocT rie iNFORMAflON THAT APPFARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE FINING HECORDER, MIMSTRY OF NORTHCRN DEVELOP MENT AND MNES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE l.AKDF SHOWN H6REON
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources
The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on this index was compiled for administrative purposes only
mCOL/)
l CD
..Q
O)
O
UJ
enroLO
iCD
top related