half hollow hills central school district · half hollow hills central school district of...
Post on 24-Sep-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
HALF HOLLOW HILLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
of Huntington and Babylon
2011 – 12 Performance ReportJune 10, 2013
1
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
District Profile 2011 - 2012
2
• Enrollment: 9656
• Free - Reduced Lunch: 11%
• Limited English Proficient: 2%
• Special Education: 15%
• Race/Ethnic Origin§ Black or African American: 12%
§ Hispanic or Latino: 7%
§ Asian / Pacific Islander: 12%
§ White: 66%
§ Multiracial: 2%
• Annual Attendance Rate: 96%
2
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
District Assessment Statistics
• Total number of New York State Assessments
• 18,195§ 3-8 ELA: 4,588
§ 3-8 Math: 4,598§ 4 & 8 Science: 1,134
§ NYSESLAT: 166
§ Regents Exams: 7,699
3
3
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
District Accountability• English-Language Arts: Good Standing• Mathematics: Good Standing• Science: Good Standing• Graduation Rate: Good Standing
4
Highest status granted
4
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
District AccountabilityStatus: In Good Standing
✓ Chestnut Hill Elementary School
✓ Forest Park Elementary School
✓Otsego Elementary School✓ Paumanok Elementary School
✓ Signal Hill Elementary School
✓ Sunquam Elementary School
✓ Vanderbilt Elementary School
✓ Candlewood Middle School✓West Hollow Middle School
✓ High School East
✓ High School West
5
5
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
English - Language Arts
6
6
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
7
ELA - Grade 3Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
7
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
8
ELA - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
8
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
9
ELA - Grade 5Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
9
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels
10
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
175187
168178 183 177 176
143 143 144 144 144 144 144
School Performance AMO
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
10
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index
11
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
48
95
143
190
District Performance AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
LEP
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
MulS
racial
11
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
12
ELA - Grade 6Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
12
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
13
ELA - Grade 7Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
13
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
14
ELA - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
14
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
ELA Grades 6 - 8 Performance Levels
15
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
175 176
147 147
School Performance AMO
15
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Mathematics
16
16
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
17
Mathematics - Grade 3Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
17
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
18
Mathematics - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
18
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
19
Mathematics - Grade 5Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
19
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Math Grades 3-5 Performance Levels
20
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
180191
181190 189 186 182
157 157 158 158 158 158 158
School Performance AMO
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
20
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Math Grades 3-8 Performance Index
21
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
50
100
150
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
LEP
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
MulS
racial
21
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
22
Mathematics - Grade 6Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
22
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
23
Mathematics - Grade 7Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
DistrictCounty
State
23
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
24
Mathematics - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
22.5%
45.0%
67.5%
90.0%
DistrictCounty
State
24
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Math Grades 6-8 Performance Levels
25
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
183190
161 161
School Performance AMO
25
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Science
26
26
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
27
Science - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
DistrictCounty
State
27
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
County and State Comparisons
28
Science - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
DistrictCounty
State
28
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Science 4 & 8 Performance Index
29
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
50
100
150
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
MulS
racial
29
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Science Grade 4 Performance Levels
30
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
188199 194 199 199 192 195
169 169 169 169 168 169 169
School Performance AMO
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
30
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Science Grade 8 Performance Levels
31
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
195 194
173 174
School Performance AMO
31
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
New York State Regents Exams
32
32
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
New York State Regents Exams
33
Comprehensive English 2011-2012
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by nearly 30 points
33
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Secondary English Performance Index
34
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
50
100
150
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
34
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
New York State Regents Exams
35
Integrated Algebra 2011-2012
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by nearly 40 points
35
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
New York State Regents Exams
36
Living Environment 2011-2012
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 41 points
36
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
New York State Regents Exams
37
US History and Government 2011-2012
0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 36 points
37
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Advanced Placement Exams• Over 2200 exams written in 2011-2012
• 85% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57%
• Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5 § National average is 14%
38
38
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Graduation Rate Accountability
39
39
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Graduation Rate Accountability
40
NYS Effec)ve Annual Measurable Objec)ve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and s)ll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
0
25
50
75
100
Graduation Rate AMO
IEP Diplomas & 5-Year grads are not considered graduates
Hispanic
40
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Graduation Rate Accountability
41
82%
12%
3%1%2%
4 Year College 2 Year College EmploymentMilitary Other
94% of all graduates attending college
41
Half Hollow Hills 2012 District Performance Report – June 10, 2013
Half Hollow Hills 2011-2012 Performance Report
THANK YOU!
42
42
top related