hcat fatigue & hvof
Post on 25-Oct-2014
106 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
HELICOPTER DYNAMIC COMPONENTS JTP FATIGUE TESTING
HCAT Review Meeting23-25 January
New Orleans, LA
2
SUBSTRATES/HT CONDITION• 4340: HRc 32-37 (UTS 150-170 ksi)• PH13-8Mo: H1050 per AMS 5629 (UTS 175 ksi)• 9310: HRc 35-40 core with HRc 59-62 carburized case
– Specimens carburized to 0.030” case depth then finish ground to a final case depth of 0.024”
• 7075-T7351 (UTS 65-75 ksi)
• Steel specimens peened per AMS 2432, 100% coverage, 8-10A intensity, CW14 shot
• 7075 peened in 2 lots– Per AMS 2430, 12-16A intensity, ASR 230 shot (Metal Improvement)– Per AMS-S-13165-97, 0.00849A intensity, S230 shot (SW United)
(Bare specimens tested as-peened)
3
COATINGS
• HVOF (Hitemco)– WC-Co– WC-Co-Cr – T400+WC-Co: 0.007-0.009”+0.003-0.004”– T400: Sprayed by not tested
• EHC (SOUTHWEST UNITED)– IAW MIL-STD-1501 & QQ-C-320– No underlayer or sealer
4
SUBSTRATE/COATING MATRIX
COATING THICKNESS PH13-8Mo 9310 7075-T7351 4340
EHC .010-.011 10 10 10 5
WC-Co 010-.011 10 10 10 3
WC-Co-Cr 010-.011 10 10 10 3
T400+WC-Co 010-.011 10
EHC .003-.004 10 10 10 5
WC-Co .003-.004 10 10 10 3
WC-Co-Cr .003-.004 10 10 10 3
Bare/Peened 10 10 10
(T-400) BOTH 10 10 10 3
5
COATING & FINISHING• Target coating finish
– HVOF: 8-10 Ra– EHC: 12-16 Ra– Final ground & polished coating thickness 0.0035-0.0040” &
0.0105-0.0110”
• First group of 0.003” EHC on 7075 had insufficient thickness for grind & polish. A 2nd set of specimens (20) was peened by SWU followed by EHC plating on 10 specimens. To be tested.
6
0.5” Coating Patch
7
FATIGUE TEST CONDITIONS
• Room temperature• Stress ratio: R = 0.1• Frequency: ≤ 60 Hz without encountering
heating above 125°F • 10 specimens/curve for 13-8, 9310, & 7075• 3-5 specimens/coating for 4340 @ 105 cycles
(130 ksi).
8
2360-83163 Fatigue Data Room Temp, R = 0.1, PH 13/8 Mo
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
1.0E+02 1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08
Cycles
Max
Str
ess
(ksi
)
bare/peened EHC (0.011 in) EHC (0.003 in) WC-CoCr (0.011 in)WC-CoCr (0.003 in) WC-Co (0.011 in) WC-Co (0.003 in) T-400
Large data points (6) indicate cracking observed
at <10,000 cycles
9
2360-83163 Fatigue DataRoom Temp, R = 0.1, 9310 (steel)
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08
Cycles
Max
Str
ess
(ksi
)
bare/peened EHC (0.011 in) EHC (0.003 in) WC-CoCr (0.011 in)WC-CoCr (0.003 in) WC-Co (0.011 in) WC-Co (0.003 in)
Large data points (3) indicate cracking observed
at <10,000 cycles
10
2360-83163 Fatigue DataRoom Temp, R = 0.1, 7075-T7351
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08Cycles
Max
Str
ess
(ksi
)
bare/peened (MRI) bare/peened (SW) EHC (0.011 in)EHC (0.003 in) WC-CoCr (0.011 in) WC-CoCr (0.003 in)WC-Co (0.011 in) WC-Co (0.003 in) T400+WC-Co (0.011 in)
11
0.011" COATINGS ON 4340
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08
Cycles
Max
Str
ess
(ksi
)
EHC WC-Co-Cr WC-Co
2 pts. each
Large data point indicates cracking observed at
<10,000 cycles
12
0.003" COATINGS ON 4340
125
130
135
140
145
1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08
Cycles
Max
Str
ess
(ksi
)
EHC WC-Co WC-Co-CrLarge data point indicates
cracking observed at <10,000 cycles
13
FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OBSERVATIONS
• Fatigue life rankings by substrate– HVOF >> EHC on 9310– HVOF > EHC on PH13-8Mo– HVOF ≥ EHC on 7075
• The difference between HVOF and EHC is greatest at lower stresses near the fatigue limit
• Fatigue life rankings by coating– WC-Co ≈ WC-Co-Cr on all 3 substrates– T400+WC-Co ≥ other HVOF coatings on 7075
• Fatigue life rankings on 4340 substrate– 0.003”: WC-Co-Cr > WC-Co ≈ EHC– 0.011”: WC-Co-Cr ≥ WC-Co >> EHC
14
15
16
Cracking detected at
2,300 cycles
17
18
19
20
POST-TEST COATING BEHAVIOR
COATING THICK PH13-8Mo 9310 7075-T7351 4340
EHC .010-.011Crack 0/10
“Spall” 10/10Crack 0/10
“Spall” 10/10Crack 0/10Spall 0/10
Crack 0/5“Spall” 1/5
WC-Co 010-.011Crack 3/10Spall 9/10
Crack 0/10Spall 10/10
Crack 1/10Spall 1/10
Crack 0/3Spall 0/3
WC-Co-Cr 010-.011Crack 10/10Spall 9/10
Crack 9/10Spall 6/10
Crack 1/10Spall 3/10
Crack 2/3Spall 0/3
T400+WC-Co 010-.011
Crack 0/10Spall 0/10
EHC .003-.004Crack 0/10Spall 0/10
Crack 1/10Spall 0/10
TBDCrack 0/5Spall 0/5
WC-Co .003-.004Crack 10/10Spall 10/10
Crack 8/10Spall 5/10
Crack 1/10Spall 1/10
Crack 3/3Spall 0/3
WC-Co-Cr .003-.004Crack 10/10Spall 10/10
Crack 8/10Spall 9/10
Crack 0/10Spall 0/10
Crack 1/3Spall 0/3
21
COATING BEHAVIOR OBSERVATIONS• Post-test cracking overwhelmingly circumferential
(ring) type.• No indications of spalling during tests.• Limited detection of cracking during tests, despite
frequent post-test evidence of cracks.• Some indications of load-carrying capability of HVOF
coatings vs. non-load bearing EHC.– Nf for 0.011” HVOF > 0.003” HVOF– Nf for 0.011” EHC < 0.003” EHC– More frequent end-of-patch failure for 0.011” HVOF vs.
0.003” coating. Low occurrence for EHC
22
SUMMARY REMARKS
• As in prior HCAT programs, the fatigue performance of HVOF coatings is equal to or exceeds that of EHC plating.
• The HVOF coatings exhibit moderate to severe spalling (coating debonding) at fracture, whereas plating loss for EHC generally is limited to the near-fracture region.
• The fatigue performance of the HVOF coatings apparently is not compromised by cracking (ring-type) relatively early in the test (<10K cycles).
top related