higher-order statistics and pairs · pdf filehigher-order statistics and pairs analysis csm25...

Post on 29-Mar-2018

221 Views

Category:

Documents

5 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs AnalysisCSM25 Secure Information Hiding

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun

University of Surrey

Spring 2008

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 1 / 41

Outcomes

Understand the principle of higher-order statisticsBe able to implement at least one steganalysis technique usinghigher-order statistics.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 2 / 41

Reading

Core Reading

«Quantitative steganalysis of digital images:estimating the secret message length»by Jessica Fridrich, Miroslav Goljan, Dorin Hogea, David Soukal,in Multimedia Systems 2003

Suggested Reading

«Higher-order statistical steganalysis of palette images»by Jessica Fridrich, Miroslav Goljan, David Soukal

Suggested Reading

Jessica Fridrich, Miroslav Goljan, and Rui Du (State University of NewYork, Binghamton) ‘Detecting LSB Steganography in Color andGray-Scale Images’ in Multimedia and Security 2001

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 3 / 41

Background

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 4 / 41

Background

Where χ2 falls short

The χ2 test we have seenAnalyses histogram only.Detects embedding in consecutive pixels

What if the message is randomly spread across the image?Generalised χ2 analysis.

Yes/No answer; cannot estimate message lengthCan be fooled if the message is biased (more 0-s than 1-s or v.v.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 5 / 41

Background

Higher-order statisticsPixels in neighbourhoods

Pairs of Values counts single pixels→ first-order statistic

Higher-order statisticsCount pairs of (neighbour) pixels (2nd order)Pixel triplets (3rd order)

Study relations between pixels in a neighbourhood

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 6 / 41

Pairs analysis

Pairs Analysis

Pairs Analysis is quantitativei.e. estimates the message length

Originally designed for GIF.We present it for spatial, grayscale images.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 7 / 41

Pairs analysis The characteristic sequence

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 8 / 41

Pairs analysis The characteristic sequence

The characteristic sequence

Let c, c′ be two colours (grayscales).Read image row by row (left to right and top down).Assign 0 to c and 1 to c′.Ignore all other colours.Resulting sequence is denoted Z (c, c′).

Definition

Z = Z (0, 1)|Z (2, 3)|Z (4, 5)| . . . |Z (254, 255), (1)Z ′ = Z (1, 2)|Z (3, 4)|Z (5, 6)| . . . |Z (255, 0). (2)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 9 / 41

Pairs analysis The characteristic sequence

The colour cut

Z ( , ) extracted from an imageExtracted column-wise (Matlab-style)Row-wise extraction is equally valid.

����

��

��

���� ��

���� ��

001111000000111111001101110010111001111110

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 10 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 11 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Second-order structure

Second-order structure (of Z and of Z ′)count pairs of consecutive bitsfour possible pairs 00,01,10,11

Homogenous pairs: 00, 11Let F be frequency of Homogenous pairs in Z .Let R = F/n be the relative frequency.

where n = N ·M − 1 is the number of pairs.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 12 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Example

0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1Homog. 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1

F = 7N = 11R = 7/11 = 0.6364

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 13 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Expected structure of Z

Let R(p) = E(R) beexpected, relative frequency of homogenous pairs in Zwhen a fraction p of pixel LSB-s have been flipped.(e.g. if a random unbiased bit string of length 2p has beenembedded)

TheoremR(p) is a parabola with minimum at R(1/2) = 1/2.

R(p) = ap2 + bp + c

for some constants a, b, and c.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 14 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Why parabola?

k1 k2 k3 k4 · · · kr

Z =︷ ︸︸ ︷0000

︷︸︸︷111

︷ ︸︸ ︷00 . . . 0

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1 · · ·

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1

nR(0) =∑r

i=0(ki − 1)

Homogenous pair remains homogenous: Pr = q2 + (1− q)2

Both change + Neither changes

Heterougenous pair becomes homogenous: Pr = 2q(1− q)

nR(q) =r∑

i=1

[q2 + (1− q)2](ki − 1) + 2q(1− q)(r − 1)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 15 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Why parabola?

k1 k2 k3 k4 · · · kr

Z =︷ ︸︸ ︷0000

︷︸︸︷111

︷ ︸︸ ︷00 . . . 0

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1 · · ·

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1

nR(0) =∑r

i=0(ki − 1)

Homogenous pair remains homogenous: Pr = q2 + (1− q)2

Both change + Neither changes

Heterougenous pair becomes homogenous: Pr = 2q(1− q)

nR(q) =r∑

i=1

[q2 + (1− q)2](ki − 1) + 2q(1− q)(r − 1)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 15 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Why parabola?

k1 k2 k3 k4 · · · kr

Z =︷ ︸︸ ︷0000

︷︸︸︷111

︷ ︸︸ ︷00 . . . 0

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1 · · ·

︷ ︸︸ ︷11 . . . 1

nR(0) =∑r

i=0(ki − 1)

Homogenous pair remains homogenous: Pr = q2 + (1− q)2

Both change + Neither changes

Heterougenous pair becomes homogenous: Pr = 2q(1− q)

nR(q) =r∑

i=1

[q2 + (1− q)2](ki − 1) + 2q(1− q)(r − 1)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 15 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

The R-function

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 16 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs

Compare the pairs Z with shifted pairs Z ′

Two parabolas

Assumption

R′(p) are parabolic and symmetric around p = 1/2, i.e.

R′(p) = a′p2 + b′p + c′.

We will study D(p) = R(p)− R′(p).Difference between two parabolæ is a parabola

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c for unknown a, b, p.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 17 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

The R′-function

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 18 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

The R′-function

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 18 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Structure of the shifted pairs (II)

WriteZ ′ = b1, b2, b3, . . . , bn

Theorem

nR′(1/2) =n−1∑k=1

2−khk ,

where hk is number of homogenous pairs among

(b1, bk+1), (b2, bk+2), . . . , (bn−k , bn).

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 19 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

The estimate of R′(1/2)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 20 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Zero message assumption

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c

Assumption

Z and Z ′ have the same structure when no message is embedded.

R(0) = R′(0)

D(0) = 0c = 0

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 21 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Zero message assumption

D(p) = ap2 + bp + c

Assumption

Z and Z ′ have the same structure when no message is embedded.

R(0) = R′(0)

D(0) = 0c = 0

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 21 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Zero point

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 22 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Symmetry

Swapping all bits does not change the statisticSwapping 1− q random bits means

Swapping all bits, and then (re)swap q random bits

Embedding q or 1− q bits is the same thing.We conclude, D(q) = D(1− q)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 23 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Symmetry

Swapping all bits does not change the statisticSwapping 1− q random bits means

Swapping all bits, and then (re)swap q random bits

Embedding q or 1− q bits is the same thing.We conclude, D(q) = D(1− q)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 23 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Symmetry

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 24 / 41

Pairs analysis Homogenous pairs

Solving a second-order equation

We can estimate R and R′ at q = 12

R( 12 )− R′( 1

2 ) = D( 12 ) = a/4 + b/2 (left side known)

We exploit symmetry0 = D(q)− D(1− q) = (aq2 + bq)− (a(1− q)2 + b(1− q)).

We solve for a and b, to get

4D(12)q − 4D(

12)q2 = D(q)

where D(12) and D(q) are known

Solving the quadratic estimate gives pEstimated message length is 2p

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 25 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 26 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Dithered backgrounds

Dithering is used to simulate additional coloursTwo colours c1 and c2 alternate over an area.The appearance would be a uniform colour somewhere inbetween.Colour cut (c1, c2) has many heterogenous pairs.The result is that R(0) 6= R′(0) and our assumption fails.This can be fixed by clever choice of colour cut.(I did not find any good examples.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 27 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Dithered backgrounds

Dithering is used to simulate additional coloursTwo colours c1 and c2 alternate over an area.The appearance would be a uniform colour somewhere inbetween.Colour cut (c1, c2) has many heterogenous pairs.The result is that R(0) 6= R′(0) and our assumption fails.This can be fixed by clever choice of colour cut.(I did not find any good examples.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 27 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Dithered backgrounds

Dithering is used to simulate additional coloursTwo colours c1 and c2 alternate over an area.The appearance would be a uniform colour somewhere inbetween.Colour cut (c1, c2) has many heterogenous pairs.The result is that R(0) 6= R′(0) and our assumption fails.This can be fixed by clever choice of colour cut.(I did not find any good examples.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 27 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Dithered backgrounds

Dithering is used to simulate additional coloursTwo colours c1 and c2 alternate over an area.The appearance would be a uniform colour somewhere inbetween.Colour cut (c1, c2) has many heterogenous pairs.The result is that R(0) 6= R′(0) and our assumption fails.This can be fixed by clever choice of colour cut.(I did not find any good examples.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 27 / 41

Where Pairs Analysis fails Dithered backgrounds

Dithered backgrounds

Dithering is used to simulate additional coloursTwo colours c1 and c2 alternate over an area.The appearance would be a uniform colour somewhere inbetween.Colour cut (c1, c2) has many heterogenous pairs.The result is that R(0) 6= R′(0) and our assumption fails.This can be fixed by clever choice of colour cut.(I did not find any good examples.)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 27 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 28 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

RS steganalysis

Proposed for true colour imagesUse information from all 8 bits of a pixelLinked to so-called lossless capacity

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 29 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Pixel groups and smoothness

Divide image into pixel groups G1, G2, . . .

Disjoint groupsConsecutive pixels

Define the smoothness of a group G = (x1, x2, . . . , xn)

f (G) =n−1∑i=1

|xi − xi+1|.

High f (G) means sharp changes from pixel to pixel.Unusual for neighbour pixels in natural images

Compare f (F (G)) and f (G)

where F is flips pixels.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 30 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Pixel groups and smoothness

Divide image into pixel groups G1, G2, . . .

Disjoint groupsConsecutive pixels

Define the smoothness of a group G = (x1, x2, . . . , xn)

f (G) =n−1∑i=1

|xi − xi+1|.

High f (G) means sharp changes from pixel to pixel.Unusual for neighbour pixels in natural images

Compare f (F (G)) and f (G)

where F is flips pixels.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 30 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Pixel groups and smoothness

Divide image into pixel groups G1, G2, . . .

Disjoint groupsConsecutive pixels

Define the smoothness of a group G = (x1, x2, . . . , xn)

f (G) =n−1∑i=1

|xi − xi+1|.

High f (G) means sharp changes from pixel to pixel.Unusual for neighbour pixels in natural images

Compare f (F (G)) and f (G)

where F is flips pixels.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 30 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Pixel groups and smoothness

Divide image into pixel groups G1, G2, . . .

Disjoint groupsConsecutive pixels

Define the smoothness of a group G = (x1, x2, . . . , xn)

f (G) =n−1∑i=1

|xi − xi+1|.

High f (G) means sharp changes from pixel to pixel.Unusual for neighbour pixels in natural images

Compare f (F (G)) and f (G)

where F is flips pixels.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 30 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Bit flipping

Maps on a single pixelF+ : 2i ↔ 2i + 1F− : 2i ↔ 2i − 1F0 is the identity.

Maps on a group, say of four, G = (x1, x2, x3, x4)

F = [F0F+F+F0] = [0110]F (G) = (F0(x1), F1(x2), F1(x3), F0(x4))

Shifted bit flip−F = [F0F−F−F0] = [0− 1− 10]

We will use one map F and the shift −F .

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 31 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Bit flipping

Maps on a single pixelF+ : 2i ↔ 2i + 1F− : 2i ↔ 2i − 1F0 is the identity.

Maps on a group, say of four, G = (x1, x2, x3, x4)

F = [F0F+F+F0] = [0110]F (G) = (F0(x1), F1(x2), F1(x3), F0(x4))

Shifted bit flip−F = [F0F−F−F0] = [0− 1− 10]

We will use one map F and the shift −F .

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 31 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Bit flipping

Maps on a single pixelF+ : 2i ↔ 2i + 1F− : 2i ↔ 2i − 1F0 is the identity.

Maps on a group, say of four, G = (x1, x2, x3, x4)

F = [F0F+F+F0] = [0110]F (G) = (F0(x1), F1(x2), F1(x3), F0(x4))

Shifted bit flip−F = [F0F−F−F0] = [0− 1− 10]

We will use one map F and the shift −F .

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 31 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Characteristic Groups

The groupsRegular group: f (G) < f (F (G))Singular group: f (G) > f (F (G))Useless group: f (G) = f (F (G))

The statisticsRF : number of regular groups under FSF : number of singular groups under FR−F : number of regular groups under −FS−F : number of singular groups under −F

RF , R−F , SF , S−F as functions of pp is number of pixels flipped by the embedding.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 32 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Characteristic Groups

The groupsRegular group: f (G) < f (F (G))Singular group: f (G) > f (F (G))Useless group: f (G) = f (F (G))

The statisticsRF : number of regular groups under FSF : number of singular groups under FR−F : number of regular groups under −FS−F : number of singular groups under −F

RF , R−F , SF , S−F as functions of pp is number of pixels flipped by the embedding.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 32 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Characteristic Groups

The groupsRegular group: f (G) < f (F (G))Singular group: f (G) > f (F (G))Useless group: f (G) = f (F (G))

The statisticsRF : number of regular groups under FSF : number of singular groups under FR−F : number of regular groups under −FS−F : number of singular groups under −F

RF , R−F , SF , S−F as functions of pp is number of pixels flipped by the embedding.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 32 / 41

RS steganalysis The idea

Statistics plot

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 33 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 34 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Approximations

Approximations based on experimental investigationSF and RF are parabolicS−F and R−F are linear

RF (p) = a1p2 + b1p + c1, (3)

SF (p) = a2p2 + b2p + c2, (4)R−F (p) = a3p + b3, (5)S−F (p) = a4p + b4. (6)

11 unknowns (10 coefficients and p)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 35 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Approximations

Approximations based on experimental investigationSF and RF are parabolicS−F and R−F are linear

RF (p) = a1p2 + b1p + c1, (3)

SF (p) = a2p2 + b2p + c2, (4)R−F (p) = a3p + b3, (5)S−F (p) = a4p + b4. (6)

11 unknowns (10 coefficients and p)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 35 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Approximations

Approximations based on experimental investigationSF and RF are parabolicS−F and R−F are linear

RF (p) = a1p2 + b1p + c1, (3)

SF (p) = a2p2 + b2p + c2, (4)R−F (p) = a3p + b3, (5)S−F (p) = a4p + b4. (6)

11 unknowns (10 coefficients and p)

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 35 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Equations

ObservationsRF (p), SF (p), R−F (p), S−F (p) from stegogrammeRF (1− p), SF (1− p), R−F (1− p), S−F (1− p) by flipping all LSB-s.

AssumptionsRF (1/2) = SF (1/2)RF (0) = R−F (0)SF (0) = S−F (0).

11 equationsWith 11 unknowns, this can be solved

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 36 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Equations

ObservationsRF (p), SF (p), R−F (p), S−F (p) from stegogrammeRF (1− p), SF (1− p), R−F (1− p), S−F (1− p) by flipping all LSB-s.

AssumptionsRF (1/2) = SF (1/2)RF (0) = R−F (0)SF (0) = S−F (0).

11 equationsWith 11 unknowns, this can be solved

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 36 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Equations

ObservationsRF (p), SF (p), R−F (p), S−F (p) from stegogrammeRF (1− p), SF (1− p), R−F (1− p), S−F (1− p) by flipping all LSB-s.

AssumptionsRF (1/2) = SF (1/2)RF (0) = R−F (0)SF (0) = S−F (0).

11 equationsWith 11 unknowns, this can be solved

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 36 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

The message length

p =x

x − 1/2,

where x is the smaller root of

s(d3 + d1)x2 + (d2 − d3 − d4 − 3d1)x + d1 − d2 = 0,

where

d1 = RF (p/2)− SF (p/2),

d2 = R−F (p/2)− S−F (p/2),

d3 = RF (1− p/2)− SF (1− p/2),

d4 = R−F (1− p/2)− S−F (1− p/2).

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 37 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Initial bias

Some experiments show estimates within ±1% of true lengthSome images have an initial bias

i.e. the cover image appear to have a short message.This must be taken into accountShort messages cannot be detected with certainty

Gaussian distribution: µ = 0, σ = 0.5%

Is it possible to estimate the initial bias?

Plot from Fridrich et al.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 38 / 41

RS steganalysis The result

Example from Fridrich et al.

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 39 / 41

RS steganalysis Counter-measures

Outline

1 Background

2 Pairs analysisThe characteristic sequenceHomogenous pairs

3 Where Pairs Analysis failsDithered backgrounds

4 RS steganalysisThe ideaThe resultCounter-measures

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 40 / 41

RS steganalysis Counter-measures

Good stego-systems?How do we foil higher-order statistics?

Stegogramme should resemble cover-imagenot necesserally visually... but statistically

Statistics-aware steganographyDesigned for specific higher-order statisticsStegogramme resembles cover with respect to statisticStill ad hoc approach

Dr Hans Georg Schaathun Higher-Order Statistics and Pairs Analysis Spring 2008 41 / 41

top related