hilo pile driving - topsector energie op z… · 15 february 2017 hilo pile driving 9 results...

HiLo pile drivingKoen Hermans

ECN

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 2

1. Introducing HiLo pile driving

2. Research goals

3. Results

Content

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 3

HiLo pile drivingHigh frequency Low energy

• Minimize noise emissions

• Reduced fatigue damage

• Limited penalty on installation time

Introducing HiLo

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 4

HiLo experiments

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 5

HiLo project – goal

‘Develop a fatigue model, based on the experimental data, that can estimate the fatigue damage at the PDA location, using only the calendar data as an input.’

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 6

HiLo project – model approach

Hammer Calendar- Energy/blow- Penetration

Plan penetration(driveability study)

Transferred- Energy- Force

Stresses in pile- Travelling wave

Fatigue- Stress cycle- Damage

Model

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 7

Data available

Hammer Calendar- Energy/blow- Penetration- and many more...

Plan penetration(driveability study)

Transferred- velocity- Force

Stresses in pile- Travelling wave

Fatigue- Stress cycle- Damage

PDA: time series per blow

Calendar: per 0.25 m penetration

17 mei 2013 Titel 8

Results

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 9

Results

Calendar energy [kJ]

Blow count [bl/25 cm]

Number of blows

Description Fatigue damage D

VP01 200-250 40 373 IHC recommended 0.0723 %

VP04 480-550 22 179 Industry standard 0.17 %

VP05 150-180 95 883 HiLo 0.0188 %

0

0,05

0,1

0,15

0,2

Fatigue damage [%]

IHC recommended Industry standard HiLo

-89 %

-74%

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 10

Correlation methodology • i.e. model not directly applicable to other sites

• Calendar resolution is main source of error

Fatigue damage during installation was much smaller than expected• 0.17 % for conventional driving

• Stress concentration factor of 3.3 16 % damage (conventional driving)

Comparison piling strategies• Up to 89% reduction fatigue damage (‘HiLo’ vs ‘Conventional driving’)

Conclusion HiLo pile driving significantly lowers fatigue damage

Project results

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 11

• Offshorewind.biz

• Cobouw

• Piledrivers magazine

• Deep Foundations magazine

News item

Koen HermansResearcher Support Structures, ECN

hermans@ecn.nl +31 625714364

Thanks for your attention

Questions?

15 february 2017 HiLo pile driving 13

Concerning the low fatigue damage

Backup slide

• Stress concentrations cause a much higher damage• Up to 40 fold the fatigue damage for SCF = 3.3