hrd mini project (shreeshail paints)
Post on 05-Apr-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
1/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 1
"Quality of Working Life" extent to which employees can enhance their personal lives through
their work environment and experiences.
Quality of working life has been differentiated from the broader concept of quality of life. To
some degree, this may be overly simplistic, concluded that quality of work performance is
affected by quality of life as well as quality of working life.
Whilst quality of life has been more widely studied, quality of working life remains relatively
unexplored and unexplained. A review of the literature reveals relatively little on quality of
working life.
It is argued that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts as regards quality of working life,
and, therefore, the failure to attend to the bigger picture may lead to the failure of interventions
which tackle only one aspect. A clearer understanding of the inter-relationship of the various
facets of quality of working life offers the opportunity for improved analysis of cause and effect
in the workplace.
This consideration of quality of working Life as the greater context for various factors in the
workplace, such as job satisfaction and stress, may offer opportunity for more cost-effective
interventions in the workplace. The effective targeting of stress reduction, for example, may
otherwise prove a hopeless task for employers pressured to take action to meet the requirements.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/employee.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_satisfactionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_satisfactionhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/employee.html -
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
2/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 2
Topic of the study:
"A Study on Quality Work Life of Small Scale Industry with reference to HRM"
Objectives of the study:-
To review & explain QWL concepts & to analyze how this QWL benefits small scaleindustries.
To reveal various socio-economic background of employees working in small scale
industry.
To identify various factors effecting quality of work life of employees working in
industries.
To identify important factors effecting QWL when employees are grouped on the basis of
personal, job related & organizational profiles.
To compare the position of different factors effecting QWL when they are grouped on
personal, job related & organizational profiles.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
3/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 3
Findings:
It was found that 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of health in spite of the
nature of job, 8% strongly agree.
It was found 19% of the workers agree that the energy & time spent on the job does not
affect their life adversely.
It was found that 12% of workers agree for getting opportunities for improvement of their
job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 4% disagree.
Suggestions:
Minimum workers are getting opportunities for improving their job in the
organization so the organization needs to take into consideration for improving
the job opportunities of its workers.
Acceptance level of the workers ideas to bring new changes in the organization is
very low. So the organization needs to accept the ideas of the workers at some
situations so as it will increase the work efficiency & leads to increase in the
productivity.
Limitations:
As the information was collected during the working hours, the employees may have
given biased answers in a hurry due to lack of time.
Due to time restriction vigor study could not be possible. Especially for the survey, based
on employees they were busy in their routine work.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
4/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 4
SHREESHAIL PAINTS
Sector: - Chemical & Chemical Industry
Industry: - Paint manufacturing
Company Name: - ShreeShail Paints
A paint manufacturing industry established September 1999. The small scale industrymanufactures Decorative paints & powder paints for the interior and exterior walls. Shreeshail
paint industry has distribution network all over Karnataka.
Location: - Gokul Gram Industrial Area, Tarihal Road.
Owner of the Industry: - Mr. Girish Nalwade.
Manager: - Mr. Onappa.
Salesman: - Mr. Angadi
Mr. Madhu
Major competitors of the industry are:-
Sony Paints
Rajdhani paints Kwality paints
Diana paints
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
5/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 5
Organization Chart
Owner
Manager
Salesman
(A)
Workers
Salesman
(B)
Workers
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
6/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 6
Products
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
7/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 7
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
Research methodology is a method to solve a research problem systematically. It
involves gathering data, use of statistical techniques, interpretations, and drawing the conclusions
about the research data.
Study Area
Shreeshail Paints, Gokul, Gram, Industrial Area Tarihal.
Sampling Method
The sampling method adopted is convenience sampling for the study of:-Quality of
Work Life in the Industrial Estates.
Data source Primary data (field survey)
Area of Research ShreeShail Paints
Research instrument Questionnaire.
Sample Unit Workers of Shreeshail paints
Sampling method Convenience sampling method.
Sample Size 30 respondents.
Tool Used SPSS
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
8/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 8
Types of data used in study
Primary Data:
Primary data is collected from the interview and discussion with the workers. The responses
given during interaction with the employees are taken into consideration.
Secondary Data:
The major source of secondary or supporting data is Internet. The information on company
profile is taken with the interaction with the Owner.
Sampling Size:
30 respondents of Shreeshail paints.
Statistical Tools used to analysis the data:
Used SPSS to make coding sheet and to prepare bar graphs.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
9/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 9
ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
10/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 10
3.
Nature of the Ownership of the unit
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Proprietary 30 100.0 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the nature of the ownership of the unit is purely
proprietary.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
11/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 11
5.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the nature of sales is Local.
Nature of Sales
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Local 30 100.0 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
12/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 12
6.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the permanent staffs are 24% & Temporary with
chance of daily work are 6%.
Terms of employment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Permanent staff 24 80.0 80.0 80.0
Temporary with change of
Daily work6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
13/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 13
7.
Nature of the Job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Managerial 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
Office supervisor 2 6.7 6.7 13.3
Office employee 1 3.3 3.3 16.7
Factory Worker 25 83.3 83.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that Managerial is 2%, office supervisor is
2%, office employee is 1 & factory workers are 25%.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
14/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
15/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 15
10.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of the respondents come from Rural, 4%
semi urban area, 8% from urban area.
Place Of Residence
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Rural 18 60.0 60.0 60.0
Semi Urban area 4 13.3 13.3 73.3
Urban area 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
16/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 16
11.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents have 3 dependencies in the
family, 9% have 4, 5% have 6 & above, 3% have 5, & 2% have 2 or less than 2 dependencies in
the family.
Number of dependence in the family
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid 2 or less than 2 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
3 11 36.7 36.7 43.3
4 9 30.0 30.0 73.3
5 3 10.0 10.0 83.3
6 and above 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
17/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 17
12.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 30% of the respondents are from Hindu religion.
Religion
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Hindu 30 100.0 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
18/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 18
13.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 26% of the respondents have Nil computer
knowledge, 2% Little & 2% Average.
Computer Knowledge
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Nil 26 86.7 86.7 86.7
Little 2 6.7 6.7 93.3
Average 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
19/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
20/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 20
15.
Membership in the trade union
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No 24 80.0 80.0 80.0
Passive 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of the respondents do not have membership
in the trade union, 6% are Passive.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
21/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 21
17
Interpretation: - From the above graph 24% of the respondents do not have experience in other
organization, 5% have experience less than 5 years, 1% more than 10 years.
Previous experience in other organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No 24 80.0 80.0 80.0
Less than 5 years 5 16.7 16.7 96.7
more than 10 years 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
22/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 22
18.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of the respondents have monthly salary, 6%
weekly salary.
Nature of Salary/Wages payment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Monthly 24 80.0 80.0 80.0
Weekly 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
23/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 23
20.
Other sources of income
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Nil 28 93.3 93.3 93.3
Business 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of the respondents sources of income are
Nil, 2% have business.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
24/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
25/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 25
23.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 25% of the respondents do not have political
involvement, 4% have passive involvement, 1% active.
Your political Involvement
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Active 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
Passive 4 13.3 13.3 16.7
No Involvement 25 83.3 83.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
26/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 26
24.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the respondents do not have saving habit,
14% have savings habit.
Do you have saving Habit
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
No 16 53.3 53.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
27/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
28/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 28
26.
Post office Savings
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 15 50.0 50.0 50.0
No 15 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of the respondents have post office savings& another 15% do not have post office savings.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
29/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 29
27.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of the respondents do not have capital
market investment & 2% have capital market investment.
Capital market Investment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
No 28 93.3 93.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
30/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 30
28.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents do not have life
insurance & 11% have Life insurance.
Life Insurance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
No 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
31/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 31
29.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of the respondents do not have medical insurance
& 13% have medical insurance.
Medical Insurance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Yes 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
No 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
32/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 32
30. (A)
Condition of House
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Electrified 30 100.0 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 30% of the respondents condition of the house is
electrified.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
33/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 33
30. (B)
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of the respondents have owned house &
13% rented house.
Condition of House
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Owned 17 56.7 56.7 56.7
Rented 13 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
34/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
35/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
36/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 36
31.
Ownership of the Household and personal assets
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Four wheeler 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
Two wheeler 5 16.7 16.7 23.3
By-cycle 18 60.0 60.0 83.3
Land line 1 3.3 3.3 86.7
Mobile phone 2 6.7 6.7 93.3
Fridge 1 3.3 3.3 96.7
Mixer/ Grinder 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of the respondents have the ownership of By-
cycle, 5% two wheeler, 2% four wheeler, 2% mobile phone, 1% fridge & 1% mixer/grinder.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
37/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 37
31. (J)
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents have 5-10 cents of Land, 6%
Nil, 5% 10-25 cents, 3% 25 cents to 1 acre & 2% more than 1 acre.
Land
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Nil 6 20.0 20.0 20.0
Up to 5 Cents 3 10.0 10.0 30.0
5-10 Cents 11 36.7 36.7 66.7
10-25 Cents 5 16.7 16.7 83.3
25 Cents to 1Acre 3 10.0 10.0 93.3
More than 1 acre 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
38/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 38
32.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of the respondents have subscription of TV, 14%
radio, 1% English daily, & 1% trade & professional journal.
Infotainment ( Subscriber/Owner)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid English Daily 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
trade and professional
journal1 3.3 3.3 6.7
TV 14 46.7 46.7 53.3
Radio 14 46.7 46.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
39/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 39
33.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents drinking water source from
public taps, 9% pipe connection, 5% own well, 4% neighbours well & 1% bore well.
Drinking water source
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Own Well 5 16.7 16.7 16.7
Neighbours Well 4 13.3 13.3 30.0
Pipe connection 9 30.0 30.0 60.0
Public tap 11 36.7 36.7 96.7
Bore well 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
40/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 40
34.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 23% of the respondents Hobbies are music, 2%
sports/games, 2% reading & 2% others.
Hobbies
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Music 23 76.7 76.7 76.7
Sport / Games 2 6.7 6.7 83.3
Reading 2 6.7 6.7 90.0
Painting 1 3.3 3.3 93.3
Other 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
41/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 41
1.
The organization is giving Fair salary/ Wages in comparison with cost of living
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
No agreement or
Disagreement1 3.3 3.3 6.7
Agree 22 73.3 73.3 80.0
Strongly agree 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of the respondents agree with the
organizations fair salary in comparison with cost of living, 6% strongly agree, 1% strongly
disagree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
42/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 42
2.
Compensation provided in your organization is better than other organizations
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
No agreement or
Disagreement12 40.0 40.0 46.7
Agree 12 40.0 40.0 86.7
Strongly Agree 4 13.3 13.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of the respondents said that compensation
provided in their organization is better than other organizations, 12% no agreement or
disagreement, 4% strongly agree, 2% disagree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
43/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
44/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 44
4.
Your organization has a fair overtime wage/salary policy
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No agreement or
Disagreement4 13.3 13.3 13.3
Agree 19 63.3 63.3 76.7
Strongly Agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents said they have
fair overtime wage policy, 7% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
45/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 45
5.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 14% of the respondents agree they are
getting fair incentives, 13% no agreement or disagreement, 3% strongly agree.
You are getting fair incentives (bonus, festival allowance etc) from the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No agreement or
Disagreement13 43.3 43.3 43.3
Agree 14 46.7 46.7 90.0
Strongly Agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
46/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 46
6.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents are no agreement
or disagreement for their employer paying good contribution to their PF, 8% agree, 2% disagree,
1% strongly agrees.
Your employer is paying good contribution to your PF
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
No agreement or
Disagreement19 63.3 63.3 70.0
Agree 8 26.7 26.7 96.7
Strongly Agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
47/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 47
7.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of the respondents are no agreement
or disagreement for the satisfactory with gratuity & group insurance scheme. 8% agree, 3%
disagree, 1% strongly agree.
You are satisfied with gratuity and group insurance scheme
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Disagree 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
No agreement or
Disagreement18 60.0 60.0 70.0
Agree 8 26.7 26.7 96.7
Strongly Agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
48/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
49/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 49
9.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 23% of the workers agree for their employer
makes prompt payment of salary, 7% strongly agree.
Your employer makes prompt payment of salary and wages
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Agree 23 76.7 76.7 76.7
Strongly Agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
50/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 50
10.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of the workers strongly disagreed with continuing
present job regardless of pay in the organization, 7% agree, 4% disagree, 3% no agreement or
disagreement.
you will continue in the present job regardless of pay received from the present organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
Disagree 4 13.3 13.3 60.0
NO agreement or
Disagreement3 10.0 10.0 70.0
Agree 7 23.3 23.3 93.3
Strongly Agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
51/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
52/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 52
12.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% disagree with their canteen facilities
available in the organization, 12% strongly disagree, 3% agree, 1% no agreement or
disagreement.
Good canteen facilities are available in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 12 40.0 40.0 40.0
Disagree 14 46.7 46.7 86.7
No agreement or
Disagreement1 3.3 3.3 90.0
Agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
53/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
54/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 54
14.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 10% of workers agree with good medical
facilities, 20% strongly agree.
There is good fist aid / medical facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Agree 10 33.3 33.3 33.3
Strongly Agree 20 66.7 66.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
55/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 55
15.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 21% of the workers strongly disagree with sports
& games facilities, 6% disagree, 2% no agreement or disagreement, & 1% agree.
You are satisfied with sports & games facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 21 70.0 70.0 70.0
Disagree 6 20.0 20.0 90.0
No agreement or
Disagreement2 6.7 6.7 96.7
Agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
56/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 56
16.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 14% of workers strongly disagree with
library facilities, 13% disagree, 2% no agreement or disagreement & 1% agree.
You are satisfied with library and reading room facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
Disagree 13 43.3 43.3 90.0
No agreement or
Disagreement2 6.7 6.7 96.7
Agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
57/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 57
17.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers are no agreement or
disagreement with good lunch room, 10% agree, 1% strongly agree.
There is a good lunch room
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid No agreement or
Disagreement19 63.3 63.3 63.3
Agree 10 33.3 33.3 96.7
Strongly Agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
58/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 58
18.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers are satisfied with
sanitary facilities, 7% strongly agree, 3% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
You are satisfied with sanitary facilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
No agreement or
disagreement3 10.0 10.0 13.3
agree 19 63.3 63.3 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
59/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 59
19.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers agree with ventilation &
air circulation facilities, 13% strongly agree.
Ventilation and air circulation facilities are fine
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 17 56.7 56.7 56.7
strongly agree 13 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
60/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 60
20.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers agree with good facilities
for disposal of waste & dust, 8% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement.
There are good facilities for disposal of waste and dust.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 6.7
agree 20 66.7 66.7 73.3
strongly agree 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
61/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 61
21.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 21% of workers said organization is
taking good measures for controlling pollution, 8% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or
disagreement.
The organization is taking good measures for controlling pollution
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 21 70.0 70.0 73.3
strongly agree 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
62/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 62
22.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of workers strongly agree with good
working condition with machines, 11% agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
Machines and equipments are in good working condition.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 11 36.7 36.7 40.0
strongly agree 18 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
63/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 63
23.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of workers agree with good safety
plan in organization, 6% strongly agree & 2% no agreement or disagreement.
The organization has a good safety plan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 6.7
agree 22 73.3 73.3 80.0
strongly agree 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
64/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
65/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 65
25.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of employees agree that they feel
normal health after days work, 7% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement, 1%
disagree.
You feel normal health after day's work
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement of
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 10.0
agree 20 66.7 66.7 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
66/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 66
26.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of the workers agree that everyone knows
who is working under whom, 11% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
Almost everyone knows who is working under whom
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement of
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 18 60.0 60.0 63.3
strongly agree 11 36.7 36.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
67/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 67
27.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers are no agreement or
disagreement with their ideas to bring new changes in the organization, 7% disagree, 3% agree,
& 1% strongly disagree.
Your ideas to bring new changes in the organization are appreciated.
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 7 23.3 23.3 26.7
no agreement or
disagreement16 53.3 53.3 80.0
agree 3 10.0 10.0 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
68/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
69/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 69
29.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 21% of workers agree for getting
adequate information about what is going on in your unit, 9% strongly agree.
You are getting adequate information about what is going on in your unit.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 21 70.0 70.0 70.0
strongly agree 9 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
70/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
71/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 71
31.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers are no agreement or
disagreement for their job providing with meaningful information about work process, 9% agree,
3% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
Your job provides you with meaningful information about work process and result.
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement17 56.7 56.7 60.0
agree 9 30.0 30.0 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
72/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 72
32.
The organization facilitates the self improvement for member
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 4 13.3 13.3 13.3
no agreement or
disagreement19 63.3 63.3 76.7
agree 6 20.0 20.0 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers are no agreement or
disagreement with organization facilities for self improvement, 6% agree, 4% disagree, 1%
strongly agrees.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
73/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 73
33.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of workers said their supervisor does
not exercise unreasonable pressure on employees, 1% no agreement or disagreement, 1%
disagree.
The supervisor does not exercise unreasonable pressure on employees
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 6.7
agree 28 93.3 93.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
74/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 74
34.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers agree with equitable
treatment is given to all workers, 10% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
Equitable treatment is given to all workers in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 19 63.3 63.3 66.7
strongly agree 10 33.3 33.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
75/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 75
35.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of workers work is well appreciated
in the organization, 7% strongly agree, 6% no agreement or disagreement, 2% disagree.
Your work in organization is well appreciated
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
no agreement or
disagreement6 20.0 20.0 26.7
agree 15 50.0 50.0 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
76/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 76
36.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers disagree with the work
assigned to employees on the basis of their abilities, 7% no agreement or disagreement, 4%
agree, 1% strongly agree.
Work is assigned to employees on the basis of their abilities
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 17 56.7 56.7 60.0
no agreement or
disagreement7 23.3 23.3 83.3
Agree 4 13.3 13.3 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
77/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 77
37.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers disagree with their work
involves planning, R&D, 11% agree, 1% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
Your work involves organizational planning, research & development
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 16 53.3 53.3 56.7
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 60.0
agree 11 36.7 36.7 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
78/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 78
38.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 23% of workers agree that the work is not
too much challenging but with limits of their ability, 3% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or
disagreement.
Your work is not too much challenging but within the limits of your ability
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement4 13.3 13.3 13.3
agree 23 76.7 76.7 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
79/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 79
39.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% disagree with opportunities for
individual creative work in the organization, 11% no agreement or disagreement, 6% agree, 1%
strongly disagrees.
There are facilities & opportunities for individual creative work in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 12 40.0 40.0 43.3
no agreement or
disagreement11 36.7 36.7 80.0
agree 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
80/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 80
40.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of workers no agreement or
disagreement that they could use newly acquired knowledge for further work assignment, 10%
agree, 7% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
You expect that you could use newly acquired knowledge for further work assignment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 7 23.3 23.3 23.3
no agreement or
disagreement12 40.0 40.0 63.3
agree 10 33.3 33.3 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
81/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 81
41.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of workers agree for getting
opportunities for improvement of their job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly
agree, 4% disagree.
You are getting opportunities for improvement of your job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 4 13.3 13.3 13.3
no agreement or
disagreement9 30.0 30.0 43.3
agree 12 40.0 40.0 83.3
strongly agree 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
82/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 82
42.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of workers agree for getting proper training
before assigning a new job, 7% strongly agree, 6% no agreement or disagreement, 3% disagree.
You are getting proper training before assigning a new job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
no agreement or
disagreement6 20.0 20.0 30.0
agree 14 46.7 46.7 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
83/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 83
43.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 10% of workers agree for their job
rotation for avoiding monotony, 9% disagree, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 2% strongly
agree.
You are enjoying job rotation for avoiding monotony
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 9 30.0 30.0 30.0
no agreement or
disagreement9 30.0 30.0 60.0
agree 10 33.3 33.3 93.3
strongly agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
84/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 84
44.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the workers no agreement or
disagreement for promotion opportunities in the organization, 6% disagree, 5% agree, 3%
strongly agree.
You are satisfied with promotion opportunities in your organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 6 20.0 20.0 20.0
no agreement or
disagreement16 53.3 53.3 73.3
agree 5 16.7 16.7 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
85/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 85
45.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of workers no agreement or disagreement
of performance appraisal in the organization based on objective not on favoritism, 6% agree, 6%
disagree, 1% strongly agrees.
Performance appraisal in the organization are based on objective assessment & not based
on favoritism
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 6 20.0 20.0 20.0
no agreement or
disagreement17 56.7 56.7 76.7
agree 6 20.0 20.0 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
86/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 86
46.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers no agreement ordisagreement for their ideas to bring new changes in the organization is appreciated, 8%
disagree, 6% agree.
The idea of employees to bring new changes in the organization is appreciated
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 8 26.7 26.7 26.7
no agreement or
disagreement16 53.3 53.3 80.0
agree 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
87/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 87
47.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of the workers no agreement or
disagreement that they will have job in the organization tills the retirement, 9% agree, 3%
strongly agree.
You believe that you will have job in the present organization till the retirement age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement17 56.7 56.7 60.0
agree 9 30.0 30.0 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
88/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 88
48.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the workers agree for the
members of the work organization have the sense of one community, 14% strongly agree.
All the members of the work organization have the sense of one community
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 16 53.3 53.3 53.3
strongly agree 14 46.7 46.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
89/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 89
49.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of workers no agreement or disagreement
for identifying in the organization on the basis of skill & potentialities, 10% disagree, 3% agree,
3% strongly.
You identify yourself as member of the organization on the basis of skill & potentialities
without regard of race, sex, age etc
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 10 33.3 33.3 33.3
no agreement or
disagreement14 46.7 46.7 80.0
agree 3 10.0 10.0 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
90/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 90
50.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 13% of workers no agreement or disagreement
with interaction in terms of ideas & feelings, 8% disagree, 6% agree, 3% strongly agree.
Members of the work organization interact in terms of ideas & feelings
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 8 26.7 26.7 26.7
no agreement or
disagreement13 43.3 43.3 70.0
agree 6 20.0 20.0 90.0
strongly agree 3 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
91/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 91
51.
"Working in a group" is no problem here.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 5 16.7 16.7 16.7
strongly agree 25 83.3 83.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 25% of workers strongly agree for
working in a group is no problem, 5% agree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
92/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 92
52.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers no agreement or disagreement
for accomplishing work collectively than individually, 10% agree, 2% strongly agree, 2%
disagree.
You prefer to accomplish the work collectively than individually
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
no agreement or
disagreement16 53.3 53.3 60.0
agree 10 33.3 33.3 93.3
strongly agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
93/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 93
53.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers disagree for members of
senior staff pay attention to grievances of junior staff, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 4%
agree, 1% strongly agree.
You think that members of senior staff pay attention to grievance of the junior staff.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 16 53.3 53.3 53.3
no agreement or
disagreement9 30.0 30.0 83.3
agree 4 13.3 13.3 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
94/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 94
54.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of workers disagree for their views taking in
resolving working problems, 2% agree, 2% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
Your views are take into account in resolving working problems
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 24 80.0 80.0 83.3
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 86.7
agree 2 6.7 6.7 93.3
strongly agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
95/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 95
55.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers agree for their organization
encourages reciprocal help, 10% no agreement or disagreement, 3% disagree, 1% strongly
disagree.
Your organization encourages reciprocal help
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 3 10.0 10.0 13.3
no agreement or
disagreement10 33.3 33.3 46.7
agree 16 53.3 53.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
96/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 96
56.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 27% of workers agree that they do not
oppose adoption of rapid changes in technology in organization, 2% strongly agree, 1% no
agreement or disagreement.
The workers does not oppose adoption of rapid changes in technology in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 27 90.0 90.0 93.3
strongly agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
97/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 97
57.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of workers no agreement or disagreement
for expansion & diversification in operation, 9% agree, 2% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
Workers always welcome expansion & diversification in operation
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
no agreement or
disagreement18 60.0 60.0 66.7
agree 9 30.0 30.0 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
98/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
99/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 99
59.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of workers disagree for superior consulting
them before decision making, 5% agree, 3% strongly disagree, 1% strongly agree.
The superiors consult you before making any major decision in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
disagree 20 66.7 66.7 76.7
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 80.0
agree 5 16.7 16.7 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
100/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 100
60.
The relation between co-workers in your organization is good
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
strongly agree 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the
relation between co-workers is good, 11% agree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
101/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 101
61.
The relation between superiors and subordinates is fine
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid agree 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
strongly agree 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the
relation between superiors & subordinates is fine, 11% agree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
102/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 102
62.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers strongly agree for good
relation between management & workers, 9% agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
There is good relation between management & workers
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 9 30.0 30.0 33.3
strongly agree 20 66.7 66.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
103/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 103
63.
Your organization takes care for the welfare of workers of all ages
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 6.7
agree 19 63.3 63.3 70.0
strongly agree 9 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of workers agree that the organization takes
care for the welfare of workers of all the ages, 9% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or
disagreement.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
104/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 104
64.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of workers agree for equal treatment in all
matters like job security etc, 7% strongly agree, 5% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
You receive equal treatment in all maters like employees compensation, job security etc
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement5 16.7 16.7 20.0
agree 17 56.7 56.7 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
105/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 105
65.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers disagree for
organization does not believe there is one way for everyone, 5% no agreement or disagreement,
5% agree. 1% strongly disagree.
your organization does no believe that "there is only one best way for everyone.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 19 63.3 63.3 66.7
no agreement or
disagreement5 16.7 16.7 83.3
agree 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
106/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 106
66.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 15% of workers strongly agree for maintaining
privacy of personal matter in organization, 14% agree, 1% disagree.
You can maintain your privacy regarding personal matters in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 14 46.7 46.7 50.0
strongly agree 15 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
107/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 107
67.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of workers no agreement or
disagreement for a well functioning conflict resolution mechanism in the organization, 12%
agree, 2% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
A well functioning conflict resolution mechanism is there in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
no agreement or
disagreement15 50.0 50.0 56.7
agree 12 40.0 40.0 96.7
strongly agree 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
108/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 108
68.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of workers agree for job satisfaction need
in general on the job, 8% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
Your job satisfying your needs in general on the job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 6.7
agree 20 66.7 66.7 73.3
strongly agree 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
109/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 109
69.
you are always aware of your health in spite of the nature of your job
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 10.0
agree 19 63.3 63.3 73.3
strongly agree 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of
health in spite of the nature of job, 8% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
110/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 110
70.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of the workers agree that their social
requirements are not neglected in the organization, 6% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or
disagreement, 1% disagrees.
Your social & individual requirements are not neglected in the organization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement4 13.3 13.3 16.7
agree 19 63.3 63.3 80.0
strongly agree 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
111/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 111
71.
The energy & time spent on the job does not effect your life adversely
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid no agreement or
disagreement4 13.3 13.3 13.3
agree 19 63.3 63.3 76.7
strongly agree 7 23.3 23.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers agree that the energy
& time spent on the job does not affect their life adversely, 7% strongly agree, 4% no
agreement or disagreement.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
112/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 112
72.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers no agreement or
disagreement that the organization functions as a social responsible unit, 8% agree, 3% disagree,
2% strongly disagree.
Your organization functions as a socially responsible unit
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
disagree 3 10.0 10.0 16.7
no agreement or
disagreement17 56.7 56.7 73.3
agree 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
113/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 113
73.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 22% of the workers agree that their job does not
lower their social prestige, 5% strongly agree, 2% disagree.
Your job does not lower your social prestige
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
no agreement or
disagreement1 3.3 3.3 10.0
agree 22 73.3 73.3 83.3
strongly agree 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
114/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 114
74.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers no agreement or
disagreement for their job have improved social security scheme, 4% agree, 4% disagree, 2%
strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
Your job have improved social security scheme
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 4 13.3 13.3 16.7
no agreement or
disagreement19 63.3 63.3 80.0
agree 4 13.3 13.3 93.3
strongly agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
115/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 115
75.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of workers disagree for stating that
organization is not too much production oriented, 3% no agreement or disagreement, 2% agree,
1% strongly disagree.
Your organization is not too much production oriented
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
disagree 24 80.0 80.0 83.3
no agreement or
disagreement3 10.0 10.0 93.3
agree 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
116/123
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
117/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 117
77.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers strongly agree for their
organization is aware of the method of industrial pollution, 9% agree, 1% disagree.
Your organization is aware of the method of industrial pollution
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
agree 9 30.0 30.0 33.3
strongly agree 20 66.7 66.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
118/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 118
78.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the
prices charged for the good by organization are reasonable from social point of view, & 11%
agree.
The prices charged for the good & services by your organization are reasonable
from social point of view
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid agree 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
strongly agree 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
119/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 119
79.
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers disagree stating that their
organization gives due importance to quality of goods, 9% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or
disagreement, 2% disagree.
Your organization give due importance to quality of good & services
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid strongly disagree 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
disagree 16 53.3 53.3 60.0
no agreement or
disagreement2 6.7 6.7 66.7
agree 1 3.3 3.3 70.0
strongly agree 9 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
120/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 120
80.
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 13% of workers agree that the
organization is contributing toward the improvement of the culture of the society, 11% no
agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
Your organization is contributing toward the improvement of the culture of the society
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid disagree 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
no agreement or
disagreement11 36.7 36.7 40.0
agree 13 43.3 43.3 83.3
strongly agree 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
121/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 121
Findings:
It was found that 18% of the respondents Education are below SSLC, 7% SSLC, & 5%
Degree.
It was found that 16% of the respondents do not have saving habit, 14% have savings
habit.
It was found that 17% of the respondents do not have medical insurance & 13% have
medical insurance.
It was found that 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of health in spite of the
nature of job, 8% strongly agree.
It was found 19% of the workers agree that the energy & time spent on the job does not
affect their life adversely.
It was found that 12% of workers agree for getting opportunities for improvement of their
job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 4% disagree.
It was found that 10% of workers agree for their job rotation for avoiding monotony, 9%
disagree, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 2% strongly agree.
It was found that 17% of workers no agreement or disagreement of performance appraisal
in the organization based on objective not on favoritism.
It was found that 22% of the respondents agree with the organizations fair salary in
comparison with cost of living.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
122/123
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli 122
Suggestions:
Some of the following suggestions we would like to give based on the analysis.
The savings habit of the workers is poor & low so the organization has to help the
workers in improving their savings by providing life insurance, medical insurance
etc.
Organization should not give too much of work stress to the workers so as itmight affects the life of the workers adversely.
Minimum workers are getting opportunities for improving their job in the
organization so the organization needs to take into consideration for improving
the job opportunities of its workers.
Acceptance level of the workers ideas to bring new changes in the organization is
very low. So the organization needs to accept the ideas of the workers at some
situations so as it will increase the work efficiency & leads to increase in the
productivity.
Only least amount of workers enjoying job rotation for avoiding monotony. So
the organization has to keep in mind that the job rotation should not lead to work
repetitiveness.
-
7/31/2019 HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)
123/123
Conclusion:
From the survey it is cleared that the Quality of work life of the workers in the
organization is up to the satisfaction level.
But still there are some Criterias to be fade out.
There are limited opportunities for the workers in the organization which will leads to the
hurdle in enhancing the improvement of their job. In order to retain the workers & work
efficiency, the organization has to recognize the views of the workers, & provide opportunities
for growth, development & security etc.
Organization has to improve the socio economic conditions of the workers so as to
increase the morale of the workers.
Quality of better work performance will ultimately lead to the Quality of better life.
top related